ENERGY FUELS INC
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 26, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Feb 26, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
The Pinyon Plain Project
The following technical and scientific description of the Pinyon Plain Project is based in part on the Preliminary Feasibility Study titled “Technical Report on the Pre-Feasibility Study on the Pinyon Plain Project, Coconino County, Arizona, USA,” dated February 23, 2023, effective as of December 31, 2022, as amended March 6, 2024, and prepared by Mark B. Mathisen, C.P.G., R. Dennis Bergen, P. Eng. and Grant Malensek, M.Eng., P. Eng., each a Qualified Person employed by SLR, Lee (Pat) Gochnour, MMSA, a Qualified Person employed by Gouchnour & Associate, Inc. and Jeffrey L. Woods, MMSA, a Qualified Person employed by Woods Process Services (the “Pinyon Plain Technical Report Summary”). The Pinyon Plain Technical Report Summary was prepared in accordance with S-K 1300 and NI 43-101. The Pinyon Plain Project was considered under SEC S-K 1300 definitions to be a production stage property as of December 31, 2024 because it contains both Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves and material extraction of Mineral Reserves occurred in 2024. Production is expected to continue in 2025.
The Pinyon Plain Project is a fully permitted underground uranium and copper deposit in northern Arizona, located on a 17-acre site within the Kaibab National Forest. The property is located at latitude 35°52'58.65” N and longitude 112° 5'47.05” W. It is situated 153 mi north of Phoenix, 86 mi northwest of Flagstaff, and seven miles southeast of Tusayan, in Sections 19 and 20, Township 29 North, Range 03 East, Gila and Salt River Meridian (GSRM), Coconino County, Arizona. Ore haulage from the Pinyon Plain Project to the Mill in Blanding, Utah, is 315 miles on paved roads and 5 miles on dirt roads.
The Company’s property position at the Pinyon Plain Project consists of nine unpatented lode mining claims (Canyon 64–66, 74–76, and 84–86), located on USFS land, encompassing approximately 186 acres. All claims are held in perpetuity by annual claims payments due on September 1. EFR acquired the Pinyon Plain Project in June 2012 and has a 100% interest in the claims.
Claim maintenance costs for 2024 were $1,800. The claims have a 3.5% Atomic Energy Commission Circular 5 royalty on uranium production, payable to a former owner of the claims.
Access to the Pinyon Plain Project site is via State Highway 64 and Federal Highway 180 to within five miles of the project site, then over unsurfaced public USFS roads. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe railway line passes east-west 50 mi south of the site at Williams, and a spur of the railway, which passes 10 mi west of the Pinyon Plain Project site, services the Grand Canyon National Park. Airports at Flagstaff, Phoenix, Prescott and Tusayan provide air access to the area.
The climate in northern Arizona is semi-arid, with cold winters and hot summers. January temperatures range from approximately 7°F to 57°F and July temperatures range from 52°F to 97°F. Annual precipitation, mostly in the form of rain but with some snow, is about 12 in.
Northern Arizona is part of the Colorado Plateau, a region of the western U.S. characterized by semi-arid, high-altitude, gently sloping plateaus dissected by steep walled canyons, volcanic mountain peaks, and extensive erosional escarpments. The Pinyon Plain Project is located on the Coconino Plateau within the Colorado Plateau, at an elevation of approximately 6,500 feet above sea level (ft ASL).
Although the Coconino Plateau is sparsely populated, tourist traffic to Grand Canyon National Park results in large numbers of people passing through the region daily. Personnel for future mining operations are expected to be sourced from the nearby towns of Williams and Flagstaff, Arizona (50 miles and 70 miles, respectively), as well as other underground mining districts in the western U.S. Material mined at the Pinyon Plain Project will be transported 320 miles on paved roads to EFR’s White Mesa Mill in Blanding, Utah for processing.
In 1982, EFN, which is not part of Energy Fuels Inc., acquired the Project. From 1982 to 1987, EFN conducted exploration drilling, permitted the mine, constructed certain surface facilities including a headframe, hoist, and compressor, and sunk the shaft to a depth of 50 ft. From 1987 to 2013, the Project was put on standby due to low uranium prices. In 2012, EFR acquired the Project through its acquisition of Denison Mines Corporation’s US assets (Denison). Beginning in 2013, EFR refurbished the surface facilities and extended the shaft an additional 228 ft to a depth of 278 ft. In late 2013, the project was again placed on standby due to low uranium prices. In October 2015, EFR re-started the Project and committed to completing the shaft and underground delineation drilling program. From October 2015 to March 2017, the shaft was sunk to a depth of 1,452 ft, and three development levels were started at the 1,003 ft, 1,220 ft; and 1,400 ft depths, all of which have functioned as drill stations. The final depth for the shaft is 1,470 ft.
In addition to the mine shaft, existing surface mine infrastructure includes surface maintenance shops, employee offices and change rooms, a water well, an evaporation pond, water treatment plant, explosive magazines, water tanks, fuel tank, and a rock stockpile (development rock). Electrical power is available through an existing power line that terminates at the site.
History
The Pinyon Plain Project is located on mining claims that EFN acquired from Gulf Mineral Resources (Gulf) in 1982 who originally staked the claims in April 1978. EFN was acquired by the Concord group in the early-1990s. The Concord group declared bankruptcy in 1995, and most of the EFN assets, including the Pinyon Plain Project, were acquired by IUC in 1997. IUC merged with Denison Mines Inc. on December 1, 2006, and the new company changed its name to Denison Mines Corporation. In June 2012, Energy Fuels Inc. acquired all of Denison’s mining assets and operations in the U.S. Currently the Pinyon Plain Project claims are held by the Company. Between 1978 and 1994, Gulf and EFN drilled 45 surface holes, including a deep water well, totaling 62,289 ft.
Since 1994, exploration activities undertaken on the property have only included drilling. Prior to that, exploration activities carried out by EFR’s predecessors from 1983 to 1987 include:
Ground control source audio magneto tellurium (CSAMT) surveys
Ground magnetics
Ground very low frequency (VLF) surveys
Time domain electro-magnetic surveys (TDEM)
Surface gravity surveys
Airborne electromagnetic (EM) surveys
During 2016 and 2017 the Company conducted an underground exploration drilling campaign during shaft sinking completing 30,314 ft. of drilling. Shaft sinking continued into 2018 finishing at a total depth of 1,470 ft.
The Pinyon Plain Project is located on public lands managed by the USFS and has an approved PO with the USFS. In 2020, the Company submitted a clean closure plan to the USFS to provide a description of how the Company will reclaim the mine to clean closure standards after the cessation of mining operations, as contemplated in the USFS-approved PO, Record of Decision and modifications to the reclamation plan contained in Appendix B of the Environmental Impact Statement. The clean closure plan included an update to the reclamation cost estimate, resulting in an increase from $461,245 to $1,407,235. In September 2009, the groundwater General Aquifer Protection Permit (“APP”) was obtained for the water storage pond from the ADEQ. This permit was up for renewal in 2019, and an application for renewal was timely submitted by the Company in 2019. General APPs were also obtained from ADEQ for the development rock stockpile and intermediate ore stockpile in December 2011 and renewed in 2018. At the request of the ADEQ, the three General APPs were consolidated into an Individual APP on April 28, 2022, which resulted in a supplemental reclamation bond being issued in the amount of $132,581. An Air Quality Permit was issued by ADEQ in March 2011, renewed in 2016, amended in 2017 and renewed in 2021. The Company received EPA’s approval under the Clean Air Act National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Pinyon Plain Project in September of 2015.
Development of uranium-bearing breccia pipes of the Arizona Strip requires minimal surface disturbance, typically less than 20 acres total. Thus, the overall environmental impact is minimal. Nevertheless, the areas in the general vicinity of the Grand Canyon can be environmentally sensitive in many ways and so the permitting, development, and operation of a uranium extraction facility in this area remains a contentious issue. As described above, in 2009 over one million acres of federal land were withdrawn from mineral location, subject to valid existing rights, and on August 8, 2023, President Biden designated the Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni – Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument, which also restricted approximately one million acres of previously withdrawn lands from mineral location, subject to valid existing rights. The Pinyon Plain mine is located within these withdrawal and national monument areas, but is considered to have valid existing rights, so can continue to be mined in accordance with its USFS-approved PO. Reclamation at the Pinyon Plain Project is bonded at its total expected cost.
Parts of two distant physiographic provinces are found in Arizona: the Basin and Range Province located in the southern portion of the state; and the Colorado Plateau Province located across the northern and central portions of the state. Pinyon Plain lies within the Colorado Plateau Province.
The region has experienced volcanic activity since the Pliocene epoch. A number of lava-capped buttes rise above the general landscape, and lava flows cover large areas in the southern part of the district. Faulting has exerted significant control on the geologic development and geomorphic history of the region. Major structural features include the Grand Wash, Hurricane, and Toroweap fault systems, all trending generally north-south with an eastern up-thrown side. These faults are topographically prominent and show impressive scarps though other less prominent fault systems exist.
The surface expression of the Pinyon Plain breccia pipe is a broad shallow depression in the Permian Kaibab Formation. The pipe is essentially vertical with an average diameter of less than 200 ft. but is considerably narrower through the Coconino and Hermit horizons (80 ft in diameter). The cross-sectional area is in the order of 20,000 ft 2 to 25,000 ft 2. The pipe extends for at least 2,300 ft vertically from the Toroweap limestone to the upper Redwall horizons. The ultimate depth of the pipe is unknown. Uranium mineralization is concentrated in an annular ring within the breccia pipe.
Mineralization extends vertically both inside and outside the pipe over approximately 1,700 vertical ft, but potentially economic grade mineralization has been found mainly in the collapsed portions of the Coconino, Hermit, and Esplanade horizons and at the margins of the pipe in fracture zones. Sulphide zones are found scattered throughout the pipe but are especially concentrated in a sulphide cap near the Toroweap-Coconino contact, where the cap averages 20 ft in thickness and consists of pyrite and bravoite, an iron-nickel sulphide. The mineralization assemblage consists of uranium-pyrite-hematite with massive copper sulphide mineralization common in and near the uranium zone. The strongest mineralization appears to occur in the lower Hermit-upper Esplanade horizons in an annular fracture zone.
In the mineralized zone, the uranium mineralization occurs largely as blebs, streaks, small veins, and fine disseminations of uraninite/pitchblende (UO 2). Mineralization is mainly confined to matrix material, but may extend into clasts and larger breccia fragments, particularly where these fragments are Coconino sandstone. In addition to uranium, copper mineralization is also found within the Main Zone of the breccia pipe. Typically replacing the matrix material, copper occurs as chalcocite, bornite, tennantite, and covelite. Additionally, lower quantities of silver, zinc, lead, molybdenum, copper, nickel, and vanadium are present and scattered throughout the pipe.
The assay data used to calculate the Mineral Resource and Reserve estimate for the Project is a combination of radiometric log data and core. Calibration data for natural gamma is available for both historical and recent drilling. When drilling is active, the natural gamma logging trucks and tools are calibrated at least every three months. Natural gamma calibration is performed at DOE standard calibration facilities located in Grand Junction, Colorado.
Drill core was collected from both historical surface holes and recent underground drilling. Recent core, which makes up the majority of data for the Project was analyzed at the Mill. The Company utilized standard QA/QC procedures for analyzing both uranium and copper. This QA/QC program involved the submission of duplicate samples, certified reference materials and blank samples to the White Mesa Mill laboratory. It also included sending samples to 3 rd Party laboratories for analysis and the submission of certified reference materials to those laboratories.
Utilizing only natural gamma logs as assay data could lead to an over or under estimation of Mineral Resources due to disequilibrium. Positive disequilibrium occurs when the uranium present has not had enough time to decay and produce daughter isotopes, which are what are actually measured during a natural gamma assay. Under positive disequilibrium a natural gamma assay would indicate lower amounts of uranium than what is present. Negative disequilibrium occurs when uranium has had enough time to decay to produce the daughter radioisotopes but was remobilized and removed from the deposit. This would lead to measuring more uranium than is present. The use of core to verify natural gamma logs is standard practice and allows for the calculation of a disequilibrium factor. The disequilibrium factor applied to the Project Mineral Resource is 1.0.
Mineral Resource Estimate
Mineral Resource estimates were prepared for the Pinyon Plain deposit using both historical surface drill hole gamma and assay data and gamma and assay data collected during underground drilling in 2016 and 2017. A model of the breccia pipe host was constructed based on drill logs and constrains the Mineral Resource. Mineralization wireframes for U 3 O 8 were based on assays and gamma data at a nominal cut-off grade of 0.15%. Low and high-grade copper wireframes were based on nominal cutoff grades of 1% and 8% respectively. Values for U 3 O 8 and copper were interpolated into blocks using inverse distance squared or ordinary kriging. Resources are presented a 0.40% U 3 O 8 Eq equivalent cut-off grade for zones that contain both uranium and copper mineralization (Main and Main-Lower) and at a 0.30% U 3 O 8 cut-off grade for zones that contain only uranium mineralization (Main-Lower, Juniper I and Juniper II).
A copper mineral resource is also associated with the Main and Main-Lower zones at Pinyon Plain. Further study is required to determine if the copper associated with uranium mineralization in the zones can be economically extracted.
The table below sets out the Mineral Resources estimates for the Pinyon Plain Project as of December 31, 2024. As stated in SK-1300 regulations, Mineral Resources must be reported exclusively of Mineral Reserves; therefore, because Mineral Resource to Mineral Reserve conversion was 100% in the Main Zone, no Mineral Resources are reported for the Main Zone. These estimates are derived from the Pinyon Plain Technical Report Summary. Daniel Kapostasy, the Company’s non-independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the Mineral Resources estimates set forth in the Pinyon Plain Technical Report Summary remained accurate as of December 31, 2024.
Pinyon Plain Project – Summary of Mineral Resources – In Situ Uranium, December 31, 2024(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
| Zone | Classification | Cut-Off | Tonnage | Grade | Contained Metal | Metallurgical Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (% U3O8) · (Tons) · (% U3O8) · (lb U3O8) | ||||||
| Main Lower | Measured | 0.3 | — | — | — | — |
| Indicated | 0.3 | — | — | — | — | |
| Measured + Indicated | 0.3 | — | — | — | — | |
| Inferred | 0.3 | 2,000 | 0.48 | 16,000 | 96% | |
| Juniper I | Measured | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Indicated | 0.3 | 37,000 | 0.95 | 703,000 | 96% | |
| Measured + Indicated | 0.3 | 37,000 | 0.95 | 703,000 | 96% | |
| Inferred | 0.3 | 2,000 | 0.58 | 24,000 | 96% | |
| Juniper II | Measured | 0.3 | — | — | — | — |
| Indicated | 0.3 | — | — | — | — | |
| Measured + Indicated | 0.3 | — | — | — | — | |
| Inferred | 0.3 | 1,000 | 0.36 | 8,000 | 96% | |
| Total Measured | 0.3 | — | — | — | — | |
| Total Indicated | 0.3 | 37,000 | 0.95 | 703,000 | 96% | |
| Total Measured + Indicated | 0.3 | 37,000 | 0.95 | 703,000 | 96% | |
| Total Inferred | 0.3 | 5,000 | 0.50 | 48,000 | 96% | |
Notes:
(1) SEC S-K 1300 definitions were followed for all Mineral Resource categories. These definitions are also consistent with CIM (2014) definitions in NI 43-101.
(2) Mineral Resources are estimated at 0.30% U 3 O 8 with an estimated metallurgical recovery of 96% for uranium.
(3) Mineral Resources are estimated using a long-term uranium price of US$65 per pound. The long-term uranium price is based on supply and demand projections for the period 2021-2035.
(5) Bulk density is 0.082 st/ft 3 (12.2 ft 3/ton or 2.63 ton/m 3).
(6) Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
(7) Numbers may not add due to rounding.
The U 3 O 8 Mineral Resource estimate for the Pinyon Plain Project dated December 31, 2024 decreased from the previously reported Mineral Resource estimate effective December 31, 2021 due to the first-time disclosure of Mineral Reserves. Total Indicated Mineral Resources decreased from 127,000 tons at 0.92% U 3 O 8 containing 2,347,000 lbs U 3 O 8 to 37,000 tons at 0.95% U 3 O 8, totaling 703,000 lbs U 3 O 8, a 70% decrease. Total Inferred Mineral Resources decreased from 16,300 tons at 0.39% U 3 O 8, containing 126,000 lbs U 3 O 8 to 5,000 tons at 0.50%U 3 O 8, totaling 48,000 lbs U 3 O 8, a 62% decrease. The decrease in the Inferred Mineral Resource is attributable to removing the Upper and Cap Mineral Resources from the Mineral Resource estimate and converting these amounts to Mineral Reserves as further disclosed below. Daniel Kapostasy, the Company’s non-independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the Mineral Resources estimates set forth in the Pinyon Plain Technical Report Summary remained accurate as of December 31, 2024.
Pinyon Plain Project – Summary of Mineral Resources – In Situ Copper, December 31, 2023(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)
| Zone | Classification | Cut-Off (eqv. U3O8) | Tonnage (Tons) | Grade(% Cu) | Contained Metal(lb Cu) | Metallurgical Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main | Measured | 0.4 | 6,000 | 9.6 | 1,155,000 | 90% |
| Indicated | 0.4 | 90,000 | 5.9 | 10,553,000 | 90% | |
| Measured + Indicated | 0.4 | 96,000 | 6.1 | 11,708,000 | 90% | |
| Inferred | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | |
| Main Lower | Measured | 0.4 | — | — | — | — |
| Indicated | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | |
| Measured + Indicated | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | |
| Inferred | 0.4 | 4,000 | 6.5 | 470,000 | 90% | |
| Total Measured | 0.4 | 6,000 | 9.6 | 1,155,000 | 90% | |
| Total Indicated | 0.4 | 90,000 | 5.89 | 10,553,000 | 90% | |
| Total Measured + Indicated | 0.4 | 96,000 | 6.1 | 11,708,000 | 90% | |
| Total Inferred | 0.4 | 4,000 | 6.5 | 470,000 | 90% |
Notes:
(1) SEC S-K 1300 definitions were followed for all Mineral Resource categories. These definitions are also consistent with CIM (2014) definitions in NI 43-101.
(2) For the Main and Main-Lower zones of the Pinyon Plain Project, a 0.40% uranium equivalent cut-off grade (% U 3 O 8 Eq) was applied to account for both the copper and uranium mineralization. The %U 3 O 8 Eq grade term is not the same as the eU 3 O 8% grade term which indicates probe rather than assay data listed elsewhere in this report. For details, seethe Pinyon Plain Project below.
(3) Mineral Resources are estimated using a long-term uranium price of $65 per pound and a Copper price of $4.00 per lb. These prices are based on independent, third-party, and market analysts’ average forecasts as of 2022, and the supply and demand projections are for the period 2021 to 2035.
(4) A copper to U 3 O 8 conversion factor of 18.19 was used for converting copper grades to equivalent U 3 O 8 grades (U 3 O 8 Eq) for cut-off grade evaluation and reporting.
(5) For the Pinyon Plain Project, Mineral Resource tonnages of uranium and copper cannot be added as they overlap in the Main and Main-Lower zones.
(6) No minimum mining width was used in determining Mineral Resources.
(7) Bulk density is 0.082 ton/ft 3 (12.2 ft 3/ton or 2.63 t/m 3).
(8) Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
(9) Numbers may not add due to rounding.
(10) Mineral Resources are 100% attributable to EFR.
The Company is currently mining the Main Zone of Pinyon Plain, which contains approximately 11.7 million lb of Cu. At this time, the Company does not intend to expend the capital required to build a Cu circuit at the Mill. The Company is currently drilling the Juniper Zone of the Pinyon Plain deposit, and core from that drilling campaign will be assayed for both U 3 O 8 and
Cu. Once the Cu resource at Pinyon has been updated for Juniper Zone Cu, the Company will reevaluate the economics and determine if it plans to produce Cu from the Pinyon Plain ore body.
Pinyon Plain Project – Summary of Mineral Resources – In Situ Copper, December 31, 2024(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
| Zone | Classification | Cut-Off (eqv. U3O8) | Tonnage (Tons) | Grade(% Cu) | Contained Metal(lb Cu) | Metallurgical Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main | Measured | 0.4 | 6,000 | 9.6 | 1,155,000 | 90% |
| Indicated | 0.4 | 83,185 | 5.9 | 10,368,106 | 90% | |
| Measured + Indicated | 0.4 | 96,000 | 6.1 | 11,708,000 | 90% | |
| Inferred | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | |
| Main Lower | Measured | 0.4 | — | — | — | — |
| Indicated | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | |
| Measured + Indicated | 0.4 | — | — | — | — | |
| Inferred | 0.4 | 4,000 | 6.5 | 470,000 | 90% | |
| Total Measured | 0.4 | 6,000 | 9.6 | 1,155,000 | 90% | |
| Total Indicated | 0.4 | 83,185 | 5.89 | 10,368,106 | 90% | |
| Total Measured + Indicated | 0.4 | 89,185 | 6.5 | 11,523,106 | 90% | |
| Total Inferred | 0.4 | 4,000 | 6.5 | 470,000 | 90% |
Notes:
(1) All notes from the Pinyon Plain Project - Summary of Mineral Resources - In Situ Copper, December 31, 2023, apply to this table.
(2) As of the date of this filing, the tons of ore is sitting in stockpiles at the White Mesa Mill or at Pinyon Plain and has not been assayed. It is assumed that the assay grade is equal to the average Indicated grade of the deposit, 5.9%
(3) The 6,815 tons mined represent 7.1% of the Total Measured + Indicated tons reported December 31, 2023.
(4) The 804,170 lbs mined represent 6.8% of the contained Total Measured + Indicated lbs reported December 31, 2023.
(5) There are no other changes to the Copper Mineral Resources between those reported December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024 than those reported due to depletion of the Mineral Resource from mining operations.
Mineral Reserve Estimate
Mineral Reserve estimates for Pinyon Plain are based on the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources as of January 10, 2023, and a detailed mine designs and modifying factors such as external dilution and mining extraction factors. Mineral Resource to Mineral Reserve conversion was 100% within the Main Zone, with the remaining zones (Main-Lower and Juniper) not considered for inclusion as Mineral Reserves. No Inferred Mineral Resources were converted to Mineral Reserves.
Based on the similarity of the Pinyon Plain deposit to other past producing breccia pipe deposits in northern Arizona, the proposed mining methods at Pinyon Plain will include a combination of long-hole stoping, shrinkage stoping, and drifting. At the completion of mining, waste generated during mine development will be used to fill the mine openings per agreed upon government regulations. Metallurgical test results provided by the Company indicated that metallurgical recoveries using optimum roasting and leach conditions will be approximately 96% for uranium.
Underground mine design completed by the Company were based on grade envelopes of assays at a nominal grade of 0.15% U 3 O 8 based on underground mining methods and processing via a toll milling agreement.
The table below sets out the Mineral Reserves estimates for the Pinyon Plain Project as of December 31, 2024. These estimates are derived from the Pinyon Plain Technical Report Summary. Current economic conditions, mine design, and cash flow analysis do not account for processing of copper mineralization and thus copper is excluded from the Mineral Reserve estimate. Daniel Kapostasy, the Company’s non-independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the Mineral Resources estimates set forth in the Pinyon Plain Technical Report Summary remained accurate as of December 31, 2024.
Pinyon Plain Project – Summary of Mineral Reserves, December 31, 2023(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
| Zone | Classification | Cut-Off(% U3O8) | Tonnage(Tons) | Grade(% U3O8) | Contained Metal(lb U3O8) | Metallurgical Recovery |
|---|
| Main | Proven | 0.3 | 7,800 | 0.33 | 50,800 | 96% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probable | 0.3 | 126,700 | 0.6 | 1,517,000 | 96% | |
| Total Proven + Probable | 0.3 | 134,500 | 0.58 | 1,567,800 | 96% |
Notes:
(1) SEC S-K 1300 definitions were followed for all Mineral Reserve categories. These definitions are also consistent with CIM (2014) definitions in NI 43-101.
(2) Mineral Reserves are estimated using a long-term uranium price of US$60.00 per pound. The long-term uranium price is based on supply and demand projections for the period 2021-2035.
(3) Underground Mineral Reserves were estimated by creating stope shapes. The stope shapes were created using a grade envelope of 0.15% U 3 O 8, with a minimum mining width of 5 ft (including hanging wall and footwall dilution), on 10 ft vertical stope heights.
(4) The breakeven cut-off grade is 0.32% U 3 O 8.
(5) A mining extraction factor of 95% was applied to the underground stopes, while underground development assumed a 100% mining extraction factor.
(6) Mining Reserves are in-situ.
(7) The density varies according to the block model.
(8) Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Pinyon Plain Project – Summary of Mineral Reserves, December 31, 2024(1)(2)(3)(4)
| Zone · Classification · Cut-Off(% U3O8) · Tonnage(Tons) · Grade(% U3O8) · Contained Metal(lb U3O8) · Metallurgical Recovery | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main | Proven | 0.3 | 7,800 | 0.33 | 50,800 | 96% | ||
| Probable | 0.3 | 119,885 | 0.56 | 1,309,019 | 96% | |||
| Total Proven + Probable | 0.3 | 127,685 | 0.53 | 1,359,819 | 96% | |||
Notes:
(1) All notes from the Pinyon Plain Project - Summary of Mineral Reserves, December 31, 2023, apply to this table.
(2) The 6,815 tons mined represent 5.4% of the Total Probable tons reported December 31, 2023.
(3) The 207,981 lbs mined represent 13.7% of the contained Total Probable lbs reported December 31, 2023.
(4) There are no other changes to the Uranium Mineral Reserve between those reported December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2024 than those reported due to depletion of the Mineral Reserve from mining operations.
At the Pinyon Plain Project, all surface facilities are in place. During 2017, an underground drilling program was completed, shaft sinking continued, and a large water tank was installed. The shaft sinking was completed by mid-March 2018. The depth of the shaft is approximately 1,470 feet below ground surface. Shaft stations are developed at depths of 1,000 feet (elevation 5,506 feet above sea level), 1,220 feet (elevation 5,286) and 1,400 feet (elevation 5,106).
The Company is evaluating the potential to recover copper from the mine as a co-product with uranium. During 2018, bench scale and pilot plant scale metallurgical test work was carried out by Hazen Research (“HAZEN”) in Golden, Colorado, in connection with the potential recovery of copper from the mine. At this time, any copper recovered would be expected to be processed using roasting, followed by acid leach and solvent extraction. Acid leach followed by SX is the current process used for uranium recovery. Following solvent extraction, if recovered, a saleable copper product would be expected to be produced by electro-winning. To recover copper from the Pinyon Plain mineralized material, some modifications to White Mesa Mill process circuits would be required. The copper modifications would be expected to include using the existing vanadium SX circuit for copper extraction, the addition of a roaster to improve copper recovery, and the addition of an electro-winning circuit. Bench and pilot scale test work done by HAZEN in 2018 indicates that acid leaching after roasting pre-treatment is expected to result in satisfactory copper and uranium recoveries. The Company has not yet determined whether it would be feasible to recover copper along with uranium at the Pinyon Plain mine and may elect to forego processing copper mineralization from the mine.
At this time, the Company does not intend to expend the capital required to build a Cu circuit at the Mill. Once drilling at the Juniper Zone of the Pinyon Plain deposit is completed, the Company will reevaluate the economics and determine if it plans to produce Cu from the Pinyon Plain ore body.
In 2019, a 1,000,000-gallon water tank was installed, in addition to the existing 400,000-gallon tank installed in 2017. These above-ground storage tanks are used for operational flexibility and extra water storage capacity during winter months. Three floating, downcasting, enhanced evaporators have been installed in the Non-Stormwater Impoundment to aid in evaporation. The tanks and evaporators are part of Energy Fuels’ water balance management practices at the site.
In 2020, a fourth floating, down-casting, enhanced evaporator was installed at the site to increase the operational flexibility of the water balance management practices. Additionally, a water capture and pumping system was installed in the shaft to segregate unimpacted water and store it for beneficial use.
In 2021, a water treatment plant was installed to process water for offsite transport. The water treatment plant was commissioned in April 2021. Water use agreements have been entered into with local farmers and ranchers through which they may utilize excess water from the Pinyon Plain Project for their own beneficial uses within the Coconino Plateau groundwater basin.
The Company decided in early 2022 to resume construction work at the Pinyon Plain mine. Site personnel were hired mid-year and work commenced to rehabilitate surface and underground infrastructure, including the mine shaft, hoist, shaft load out equipment, air compressors and mobile mine equipment. In some cases, new and used mining equipment was purchased. Engineering included finalizing the mine design, ventilation network and load out system. Mine development began in late 2022, which included driving drifts to the shaft loadout and sump clean-out.
In continuing to move the Project towards production, work in 2023 included the hiring of new onsite personnel, installation of underground loading pockets, continued underground drift development, the installation of an underground shop, construction of a surface ore pad and starting a vent raise.
During 2024, a vent raise was completed, which aided in providing fresh air to the mine as well as acting as an emergency escapeway. Underground development continued in both the Main and Juniper zones. Two drill stations were installed along the decline to the Juniper Zone. Delineation drilling in the Juniper Zone started in October 2024 and is expected to be completed in Q1 2025. Ore that was encountered during development was mined and placed on the ore pad. As of December 31, 2024, 6,815 tons of ore were mined at an average grade of 1.53% U 3 O 8 containing 207,981 lb U 3 O 8. Transportation from and hence Production at Pinyon Plain was delayed in 2024 by several months as the Company engaged in discussions with the Navajo Nation, the largest and most populous indigenous tribe in the U.S., that resulted in the signing of an agreement governing the transport of uranium ore along federal and state highways crossing the Navajo Nation, which was announced on January 29, 2025. Ore transport from the Pinyon Plain mine re-commenced on February 12, 2025, which resolved the issue and ended the delay in transportation and production.
The Pinyon Plain Mine is being developed from the two lower shaft stations. Development drifts are driven by miners using jack-legs to spiral around the mineralized zone of the breccia pipe in the country rock and establishing various sub-levels to access the ore. Once development is complete, miners then proceed to stope mine areas to create voids where the ore can then be ring drilled and larger zones can be mined in bulk. Ore is moved to the shaft utilizing Load-Haul-Dump ("LHD") muckers, dumped into a grizzly that feeds a hopper. The hopper loads the skips where it is then hoisted to the surface, dumped and moved to the ore pad for temporary storage. The ore from the ore pad is loaded into trucks, tarped and hauled to the Company's White Mesa Mill for processing.
The Pinyon Plain Project was acquired by the Company in June 2012 through the acquisition of the U.S. Mining Division from Denison. As of December 31, 2024, the total net book value attributable to the Pinyon Plain Project and its associated equipment on the financial statements of the Company was $12.68 million.
In 2025, the Company plans to continue production of U 3 O 8 from Pinyon Plain. Following the completion of delineation drilling of the Juniper Zone, the Company plans to update the Mineral Resource associated with the Juniper Zone and declare a Mineral Reserve on the Juniper Zone if mining of the Juniper Zone indicates positive economics.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.