ENERGY FUELS INC
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 26, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Feb 26, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
The Donald Project
The following technical and scientific description of the Donald Project is based in part on a number of publicly available documents released by Astron, including mineral resource and ore reserve reports prepared in accordance with JORC, and press releases. Their stated mineral resources and ore reserves do not comply with S-K 1300 or NI 43-101 and the Company is not treating them as current Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves under either S-K 1300 or NI-43-101. Daniel Kapostasy, a Professional Geologist licensed in Wyoming (PG-6778) and in Utah (10110615-2250), employed as the Company's Vice President, Technical Services, is the Qualified Person for the disclosure of scientific and technical information associated with the Donald Project. Currently, the Donald Project has no S-K 1300 of NI 43-101 Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves and is therefore considered to be an exploration stage property.
The Donald Project (“Donald”) is a significant rare earth and mineral sands project located in the Wimmera region of Victoria, Australia. It is located approximately 300 km northwest of Melbourne. Donald is located at approximately 36°27'57” South latitude and 142°48'02” East longitude.
Donald covers a large area of over 426 km2, stretching 60 km north to south, and at its widest, 10 km east to west.
Astron, through its subsidiary Dickson & Johnson Pty Ltd (“D&J”), currently holds the Donald mineral tenements through the joint venture entity Donald Project Pty Ltd (“DPJV”). As of December 31, 2024, the Company has a 4.49% interest in DPJV through its wholly owned subsidiary EFR Donald Ltd (“EFRD”), while Astron, through D&J, holds the remaining 95.51% interest in DPJV. The breakdown of the total license area by mineral license is shown in the table below:
| License No. | License Type | Area (hectares) | Expiry Date | Held By |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN5532 | Mining Lease | 2,784 | August 19, 2030 | DPJV |
| RL2002 | Retention License | 24,371 | October 9, 2029 | DPJV |
| Total | 27,155 | |||
On June 4, 2024, Energy Fuels, through EFRD, entered into a JVA with DMS, D&J, DPJV and their affiliate Astron Mineral Sands Pty Ltd (collectively, the “Astron Affiliates”). Under the terms of the JVA, the Astron Affiliates would contribute certain assets, including tenements MIN5532 and RL2002 constituting the Donald Project, into DPJV, and Energy Fuels would (subject to a positive Donald FID (defined below)) invest up to AUS$183 million in DPJV and issue $17.5 million of Energy Fuels Shares to D&J to earn up to a 49% interest in DPJV.
Completion of the establishment of the joint venture (“Completion”), which occurred on September 25, 2024, was conditional on a number of conditions precedent, including registration of the transfer of MIN5532 and RL2002 to DPJV and Energy Fuels receiving a no-objection statement from Australia’s Foreign Investment Review Board (“FIRB”) for the proposed investment.
Energy Fuels is required to fund (including the amount advanced under the secured loan) approximately AUD$22.3 million (approximately $13.9 million at December 31, 2024 exchange rates) (which is expected to be expended during the Pre-FID period) from its existing working capital to be used by DPJV to update and expand the 2023 DFS and prepare for a final investment decision to proceed with the development of phase 1 of the Donald Project relating to MIN5532 (Donald FID) as soon as practical.
Under the terms of the JVA, both Astron and Energy Fuels have agreed to proceed with the Donald FID unless it is not commercially reasonable to proceed for one or both parties acting reasonably, including taking into consideration (at the time of Donald FID):
if the project has been fully permitted;
the availability of external financing;
the cash-flow forecasts for both Energy Fuels and Astron (including under suitable downstream offtake agreements for REEC (comprised primarily of monazite and also containing other REE-bearing minerals) and HMC).
Of the US$17.5 million of Energy Fuels Shares, US$3.5 million worth of shares were issued to D&J upon Completion, and the remaining US$14.0 million of Energy Fuels Shares will be issued to D&J upon unanimous approval of the Donald FID by D&J and Energy Fuels. If the Donald FID is approved, Energy Fuels is to fund the balance of the AUS$183 million to earn the agreed 49% interest in DPJV. After Energy Fuels has completed its funding of AUS$183 million, further expenditure for the development of the Donald Project is to be funded by Energy Fuels and D&J (guaranteed by Astron) on a pro-rata basis.
If there is no unanimous Donald FID within three years after Completion, but D&J has voted in favor of the Donald FID, then D&J has the option to buy out Energy Fuels’ interest in DPJV for the fair market value as at that date. If D&J does not exercise this option, or if there is otherwise no unanimous Donald FID within three years after Completion, Energy Fuels is to remain a minority shareholder in DPJV (receiving a percentage interest based on the amount funded by Energy Fuels as at that date) and all future funding will be made by the parties pro-rata in accordance with their percentage interests in DPJV.
An affiliate of Astron has been appointed as the manager of the Donald Project. The JVA provides that specified major decisions relating to the development of the Donald Project are subject to approval of Energy Fuels while it is earning in its interest, and should it earn its 49% interest. The JVA also provides for the parties to carry our further activities in relation to the proposed phase 2 of the Donald Project relating to RL2002, including the preparation of a definitive feasibility study and of a final investment decision.
Energy Fuels has entered into an offtake agreement with DPJV which provides that, subject to the Donald FID being made and commissioning of phase 1, Energy Fuels shall purchase 100% of the Donald Project REE production at a price based on market prices of the contained REE oxides, subject to a floor price below which the downstream production and sale of separated REEC oxides would not be justified and Energy Fuels would not be obliged to purchase the monazite. Energy Fuels’ REEC offtake agreement with DPJV may be terminated in certain circumstances, including if Energy Fuels remains a minority shareholder where D&J does not exercise the option to buy out Energy Fuels or if there is otherwise no unanimous Donald FID within three years after Completion, both as described above.
Astron has the right to enter into an offtake agreement for 100% of the Donald Project's zircon and titanium minerals concentrate for processing at its mineral separation plant (which is not part of the joint venture).
The JVA also grants Energy Fuels a first right of refusal over participation in the development of Astron's Jackson deposit, which is contained in tenement RL2003 and adjoins the Donald Project to the south-west, should Astron plan to pursue such development with a third party. RL2003 is held by DPJV, has an area of 15,481 hectares, and is pending renewal.1
As of December 31, 2024, the Company has earned a 4.49% interest in MIN5532 and RL2002 of the Donald Project through the DPJV.
There is a 2.75% royalty payable to the Earth Resources Regulator (“ERR”) within the State of Victoria's Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action (“DEECA”) associated with the Project.
The Donald Project is located within a broadacre agricultural region where wheat, barley, canola, legumes and pulses are typically grown, with scattered rural residential properties throughout the area. Sheep grazing commonly occurs on feed crops and crop stubbles. The closest town is Minyip located 14 km to the west of the MIN5532. The townships of Donald, Murtoa, Rupanyup and Warracknabeal are all within 45 km by road. All the towns surrounding the mine typically have small and ageing populations with median ages typically above the State average whilst median incomes are below the State average. The regional centre of Horsham is approximately 65 km to the southwest.
The Donald Project area is within the semi-arid climatic zone of southern Australia and has a Mediterranean to continental climate (i.e., cool, wet winters and warm to hot, dry summers). The average annual rainfall is approximately 400 mm with rain falling on an average of 98 days per year. The average summer and winter temperatures are 13ºC to 30ºC and 4ºC to 13ºC, respectively.
The Donald Project benefits from excellent existing infrastructure in the local area including paved roads, railroads, sources of water, electricity and personnel. Further, with the number of mining projects currently under exploration in the local area, infrastructure to support further mine development in the region would be expected to improve over time.
Power and water will be accessible from existing grid infrastructure in the local area. Additional infrastructure expected to be required for open pit mining has been designed and costed, including:
Mining Unit Plant (MUP)
Wet concentrator plant (WCP)
Concentrate Upgrade Plant (CUP)
HMC and REMC product handling facilities
Reagents receipt and distribution
Maintenance workshops
Internal Roads and External Road Upgrades
Offices and crib rooms
Fuel storage and refueling area
66kV Overhead Power from Horsham
GWM Water reticulation upgrades to transfer fresh water from storage in Taylors Lake to mine site
Fresh water, process water and sediment control Dams
Wash Bay
Stores
Tire Repair Facility
Vehicle Parking Facilities
Salvage Yard
Pit dewatering
Land purchase
Accommodation facility in nearby town
History
The Donald deposit (MIN5532 & RL2002) and the Jackson deposit (RL2003) were historically known as WIM250 and WIM200, respectively. They represent two of six WIM-style deposits that were initially discovered by CRA in the early 1980s. These tenements were acquired by Astron in 2004 and have since been subject to extensive evaluative and de-risking test work, notably, additional geological drilling, metallurgical test work and environmental studies.
There have been multiple drilling campaigns conducted across the Project since the early 1980s. All drilling since 2000 has been conducted by licensed and trained drillers from Wallis Drilling using the reverse circulation air core (“RCAC”) method and NQ rods with a nominal drill bit diameter of 82 mm. In total across all tenements there are 1,985 drillholes totaling 50,581 m of drilling. The table below details the drilling information used for the 2022 JORC mineral resource estimate of which MIN5532 is the core mineral tenement.
| Company | Year | No. Drillholes | Meters Drilled | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRA Exploration | 1982-1989 | 91 | 2,250 | Used for geological interpretation only |
| 2000 | 1 | 19 | Used for geological interpretation only | |
| Zirtanium | 2002 | 14 | 327 | |
| 2004 | 225 | 4,967 | Used for geological interpretation. Assay and mineral assemblage data used for Area 2 where total HM data is from +38μm to 90μm fraction | |
| 2010 | 167 | 3,969 | Used for geological interpretation. Assay data (total HM, slimes and oversize) use for grade estimation in Area 2 | |
| DMS/Astron | 2015 | 102 | 2,777 | |
| 2022 | 245 | 6,355 | All geological, assay and mineral assemblage data used for Area 1 | |
| Total | 845 | 20664(1) |
Note:
- This total represents the total drilling used for the JORC mineral resource estimate and includes drilling on MIN5532 and RL2002.
The table below details the drilling information strictly for RL2002 (wider Donald).
| Company | Year | No. Drillholes | Meters Drilled | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRA Exploration | 1982-1989 | 332 | 8,970 | 300 holes with HM assays |
| 275 holes with VHM assays | ||||
| 2002 | 23 | 558 | 23 holes with HM assays | |
| 15 holes with VHM assays | ||||
| Zirtanium | 2004 | 118 | 2,603 | 108 holes with HM assays |
| 51 holes with VHM assays | ||||
| 2010 | 179 | 4,607 | 176 holes with HM assays | |
| 21 holes with VHM assays | ||||
| DMS/Astron | 2015 | 153 | 4,206 | 150 holes with HM assays |
| 21 holes with VHM assays | ||||
| Total | 805 | 20,944 | ||
The table below details the drilling information strictly for RL2003 (Jackson).
| Company | Year | No. Drillholes | Meters Drilled | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRA Exploration | 1982-1989 | 308 | 7,943 | 300 holes with HM assays |
| 275 holes with VHM assays | ||||
| Zirtanium | 2002 | 22 | 498 | 23 holes with HM assays |
| 15275 holes with VHM assays | ||||
| 2013 | 136 | 3,948 | 108 holes with HM assays | |
| 51 holes with VHM assays | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMS/Astron | 2015 | 82 | 1,961 | 176 holes with HM assays |
| 21 holes with VHM assays | ||||
| Total | 548 | 14,350 | ||
Commencement of the Environmental Effects Statement (“EES”) application started in 2005 and was positively assessed in 2008. Since that time there have been amendments to regulations governing mining and environmental protection, and; thus, in addition to updates to the project design for more efficient processing and capital efficiency, have resulted in Donald having to update certain impact assessments. Crucially, as Donald remains largely as described and positively assessed in 2008, a new assessment is not expected to be required - rather, these updated assessments will form part of the Work Plan submission to ERR completed in Q3 2023 and expected to be approved by Q2 2025. Following the 2008 EES, Astron through DMS obtained the following permits and licenses for continued advancement of Donald.
| Year | Approval/License Granted |
| 2009 | EPBC Approvals Granted (varied, renewed in 2018 and expected completion for current renewal application is Q1 2025), expires in 2042 |
| 2010 | Mining License (MIN5532) Granted, expires in 2031 |
| 2011 | Water Supply Rights Purchased (6.975 Glpa bulk water entitlement), expires in 2041 |
| 2014 | Cultural Heritage Management Plan (“CHMP”) Approved for Workplan Area of MIN 5532 |
| 2015 | Radiation License Obtained (renewed to 2026) |
| 2023 | Cultural Heritage Disturbance Report demonstrating no statutory requirement for a Cultural Heritage Management Plan (CHMP) relating to the road upgrades |
| 2024 | Cultural Heritage Disturbance Report demonstrating no statutory requirement for a CHMP relating to the water pipeline installation |
| 2024 | Planning Permit for Accommodation Village |
| 2024 | Removal of Sites on MIN5532 from Victoria's Heritage Register |
Below are a list of additional approvals and licenses required prior to commencement of construction, including those relating to ancillary infrastructure (powerline and water pipeline) and proposed road upgrades.
| Approval Required | Relevant Regulatory Agency | Primary Compliance Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Work Plan | Victorian Earth Resources Regulator | •ERR Guidelines•EES Ministerial Assessment requirements•Environmental Protection Act (2017) (“EP Act”) requirements general environmental duty (“GED”) and other specific requirements•2017 DEECA vegetation removal and offset requirements |
| Biodiversity Offset Management Plan and Minister's Consent to Commence the Activity | Commonwealth Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (“DCCEEW”) | •Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999) (“EPBC Act”) |
| Planning and approvals for off-MIN infrastructure | Victorian Department of Transport and Planning (“DTP”), Local Shire(s) | •Compliance with local planning requirements•Assessment of impacts•Approval to remove vegetation relating to the planned road upgrades, water pipeline installation and powerline development |
| Secondary licenses and permits | Various agencies | •EPA (A18) Permit(s) to remove, use and return tailings to in-pit tailings storage and/or mining void•License to construct and operate dams/tailings storage facility from water authority |
|---|
The Donald deposit is within the Murray Basin, which comprises flat-lying Cenozoic sediments that unconformably overlie Proterozoic and Paleozoic basement rocks. The mineralization is contained within the Tertiary aged Loxton Sand, a sequence of marine sands representing a range of environments including deep-water (offshore), near shore, tidal, beach and back dunal sediments.
The mineralization at Donald is contained within the marine sequence of the Loxton Sand. The marine sequence of the Loxton Sand unit can be subdivided into three sub-units:
LP1 - fine to very coarse friable quartz sands and minor silty, clay and gravel beds representing dunal, foreshore and surf zone sediments;
LP2 - near-shore, very fine silty micaceous quartz sands, minor clays and gravels, representing sediments deposited below the wave base that show friable laminated and truncated HM mineralized beds. LP2 is the principal fine-grained heavy mineral target throughout the Murray Basin and contains the majority of the mineralization in the Donald deposit; and
LP3 - represents deep water sedimentation containing higher silt and clay material than LP2.
Within the Donald deposit area, the Loxton Sand is underlain by the Geera Clay. The Geera Clay typically consists of black, grey, green or yellow brown plastic clays, with minor silts and is interpreted as to have formed in shallow water, marginal marine, lagoonal or tidal flat environments.
The Loxton Sand is overlain by the fluvio-deltaic Shepparton Formation, which consists of clay and silt.
After the removal of slimes and oversize, the content of HM was determined using heavy liquid separation. The HM content was assayed using grain counts with checks on the zircon, monazite and titanium content using XRF. Starting in 2022, Stationary XRF, Laser ablation-ICPMS and QEMScan instruments were used by industry independent laboratory Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd to determine valuable heavy minerals.
Quality control consisted of field duplicate samples prepared by DMS and the laboratory. No blanks were submitted. A second laboratory was not used. Company standards of a defined HM, slimes and oversize grade were inserted in the field by DMS (1 in 40 samples) in drilling from 2016 onward (for MIN5532). Laboratory standards were also inserted by Bureau Veritas (1 in 28 samples) in the 2022 assay test work (for MIN5532).
Twin holes, both Air Core and Sonic drilling, were used to check the results of earlier drilling which showed consistency between the different drilling programs. The data was stored in an Access database and checked against the original sample reports.
A series of adjustments to the sample data was made. This included:
For zircon % derived from grain counting the Zircon_Min_pct value was used. The grain count method quantifies mineral zircon so no conversion was applied.
For zircon % derived from XRF results the ZrO 2_HfO 2_pct value. Mineral zircon % = ZrO 2+HfO 2 / 0.667 conversion applied on 2022 drilling XRF assays.
For zircon % derived from other XRF, results use “ZrO 2_HfO 2_conv” value. Mineral zircon = ZrO 2+HfO 2 / 0.667, conversion previously applied to older XRF assays.
Limited assay values for rutile + anatase % are available. The percentage of rutile is generally contained in the database. For resource estimation the following sample adjustments were made:
Where rutile + anatase % only data was not available, rutile + anatase was calculated from the rutile % data using the following formula which was derived from a correlation plot where both sets of data are available.
The ilmenite % values obtained from the DMS drilling contained magnetite. Based on a comparison with the CRA drilling the DMS ilmenite grades were decreased by 1.6 % to remove the magnetite from the assay.
The Donald Project does not have any S-K 1300 or NI 43-101 compliant mineral resources or mineral reserves.
Prior to the Company entering into an agreement to acquire an interest in the Donald Project, Astron issued a report entitled Donald Rare Earth and Mineral Sands Project - Mining License Mineral Resource Update that estimated, in accordance with JORC standards, the mineral resources of the Donald Project as of November 30, 2022. These estimates are summarized below for informational purposes only. A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the estimates as current S-K 1300 or NI 43-101 estimates of Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves, and the Company is not treating them as such.
AMC was commissioned in 2016 to carry out the RL2002 Mineral Resource estimate. The Mineral Resource for RL2002 was estimated using Ordinary Kriging. 100 mE x 200 mN x 1 mRL size parent blocks with sub-blocks down to a minimum size of 20 m x 40 m x 0.25 m were assessed at a cut-off grade of 1% HM. Sub-blocks were used to increase the precision at a boundary like topography and grade estimation boundaries.
The estimate is based on 377 drillholes with Heavy Mineral analysis. The general drillhole spacing varies from 125 mE x 450 mN to 250 mE x 500 mN. AMC prepared a resource block model and mineral resource estimates of HM, slimes and oversize. All drillholes were sampled for HM at one-meter intervals.
Valuable heavy minerals (“VHM”) Mineralogy analysis was completed on 246 of the 377 drill holes. Approximate spacing of these drillholes were 200mE x 450mN. All drillholes that underwent VHM analysis were Reverse Circulation Air Core (“RCAC”) with a nominal rod diameter of 76mm. From these a VHM mineral resource was calculated at a 1% HM cut-off grade. Only the VHM Mineral Resource was used in the conversion to ore reserve for RL2002.
For reported mineral resources within RL2002 outside of MIN5532, heavy minerals are defined as those heavier than 2.96 specific gravity and with a grainsize in-size range between 38µm and 90µm.
Donald Project - 100% Basis - Summary of In-Situ Historical Mineral Resources, November 30, 2022
| Classification · Tonnes(Mt) · HM Tonnes(Mt) · HM(%) · Slimes(%) · Oversize(%) · Mineral Assemblage as % of HM · EFRShare | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Within MIN 5532) · ILM(%) · RUT(%) · LEUC(%) · ZIR(%) · MON(%) · XEN(%) | ||||||||||||
| Measured | 131 | 5 | 3.8 | 17 | 10 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 14 | 1.8 | 0.64 | 3.2% |
| Indicated | 64 | 2 | 3.1 | 27 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 16 | 15 | 1.6 | 0.58 | 3.2% |
| Measured + Indicated | 195 | 7 | 3.6 | 20 | 11 | 19 | 10 | 19 | 14 | 1.8 | 0.63 | 3.2% |
| Inferred | 20 | — | 2.3 | 22 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 20 | 13 | 1.8 | 0.55 | 3.2% |
| Classification | Tonnes(Mt) | HM Tonnes(Mt) | HM(%) | Slimes(%) | Oversize(%) | Mineral Assemblage as % of HM | EFRShare | |||||
| (Within RL2002 outside MIN 5532) | ILM(%) | RUT(%) | LEUC(%) | ZIR(%) | MON(%) | XEN(%) | ||||||
| Measured | 33 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 7 | 30 | 7 | 23 | 21 | 2.9 | — | 3.2% |
| Indicated | 90 | 4 | 4.6 | 25 | 2 | 34 | 5 | 18 | 17 | 3.6 | — | 3.2% |
| Measured + Indicated | 123 | 6 | 4.7 | 24 | 3 | 32 | 6 | 19 | 18 | 3.4 | — | 3.2% |
| Inferred | 647 | 32 | 4.9 | 15 | 6 | 33 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 2 | — | 3.2% |
| Classification | Tonnes(Mt) | HM Tonnes(Mt) | HM(%) | Slimes(%) | Oversize(%) | Mineral Assemblage as % of HM | EFRShare | |||||
| Total DonaldDeposit | ILM(%) | RUT(%) | LEUC(%) | ZIR(%) | MON(%) | XEN(%) | ||||||
| Measured | 164 | 7 | 4.1 | 18 | 10 | 22 | 10 | 20 | 16 | 2.1 | — | 3.2% |
| Indicated | 154 | 6 | 4.1 | 26 | 6 | 27 | 5 | 17 | 15 | 2.9 | — | 3.2% |
| Measured + Indicated | 318 | 13 | 4.1 | 22 | 8 | 24 | 8 | 19 | 16 | 2.4 | — | 3.2% |
| Inferred | 667 | 32 | 4.8 | 15 | 6 | 33 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 2 | — | 3.2% |
Notes:
The mineral resources given in this table conform to the JORC code of reporting and do not represent current Mineral Resources under S-K 1300 or NI 43-101, nor is the Company treating these as current Mineral Resources. These mineral resources are historical in nature and a Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the estimates as a current estimate of Mineral Resources. Further drilling and data collection might not prove out the numbers in the table above.
Mineral resources are exclusive of ore reserves.
Mineralization reported above at a cut-off grade of 1.0% total heavy minerals (“HM”).
For within MIN5532, total HM is from within the +20 µm to -250 µm size fraction and is reported as a percentage of the total material. Slimes are the -20 µm fraction and oversize is the +1 mm fraction.
For reported mineral resources within RL2002 outside of MIN5532, heavy minerals are defined as those heavier than 2.96 specific gravity and with a grainsize in-size range between 38µm and 90µm. Oversize is the +1 mm fraction.
For outside of MIN5532, bulk density was based on a correlation between bulk density and HM% using the following industry accepted formula: BD = 1.65 + (0.01 x HM%). For within MIN5532, bulk density values were applied to geological domains based on bulk density sampling and laboratory test work of samples.
RUT (%) is a combination of rutile + anatase.
Numbers might not add due to rounding.
Mineral Reserve Estimate
Prior to the Company entering into an agreement to acquire an interest in the Donald Project, Astron issued a report entitled “Donald Rare Earth and Mineral Sands Project - Ore Reserves Update” that estimated, in accordance with JORC standards, the Ore Reserves of the Donald Project as of March 31, 2023. These estimates are summarized below for informational purposes only. A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the estimates as current S-K 1300 or NI 43-101 estimates of Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves, and the Company is not treating them as such.
The methodology in determining the updated Ore Reserve was as follows:
The deposit has been assessed through pit optimization, detailed mine design, mine scheduling and economic modelling.
Individual discrete mining blocks have been digitized around ore and overburden. Pillars of in situ material have been left between adjacent mining strips to prevent tails from entering the working areas. Mining dilution and ore loss are inherent in the process and no additional dilution or ore loss has been applied when converting the mineral resource model for mine planning.
The extent and depth of the area to be mined were decided by pit optimization using the Lerchs-Grossman (LG) algorithm. Nested pit shells generated and tested with sensitivities on mining cost, processing cost, metal price, and recoveries formed the basis of the optimal pit shell to maximize value and achieve operational design requirements.
LG pit optimizations assessed Measured and Indicated classified material only. No Inferred material was included in the LG assessment.
Vertical walls were used for the geotechnical slopes for the purpose of the LG optimization. From experience, in WIM style deposits (typically wide and shallow) there is negligible difference in the resultant optimized shape and financial analysis between a mine designed with slopes and with vertical walls due to the shallow depth of the deposit. Any designs intended for construction, are required to be designed with safe slopes.
Required capital expenditure mostly relates to mining vehicles, with a portion related to infrastructure such as fuel storage and a workshop.
The pit will be mined in 500m NS long and 500m EW wide blocks in a strip sequence.
The mining method will be by truck and excavator.
Ore will be fed into a MUP where it is screened and slurried and pumped to the WCP onsite.
Sand tails, from the wet concentrator, will be returned to the mine void and placed in constructed cells to be covered by previously stockpiled overburden prior to rehabilitation.
Donald Project - 100% Basis - Summary of In-Situ Historical Ore Reserves, March 31, 2023
| Classification · Tonnes(Mt) · HM Tonnes(Mt) · HM(%) · Slimes(%) · Oversize(%) · Mineral Assemblage as % of HM · EFRShare | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Within MIN 5532 · ILM(%) · RUT(%) · LEUC(%) · ZIR(%) · MON(%) · XEN(%) | ||||||||||||
| Proved | 263 | 12 | 4.4 | 15.4 | 9.8 | 12.6 | 5.5 | 25.9 | 16.7 | 1.8 | 0.67 | 3.2% |
| Probable | 46 | 2 | 4.1 | 19.7 | 11.1 | 21.6 | 5.5 | 20.1 | 15.3 | 1.8 | 0.64 | 3.2% |
| Proved + Probable | 309 | 14 | 4.4 | 16.1 | 10 | 21.6 | 5.5 | 25.1 | 16.5 | 1.8 | 1.66 | 3.2% |
| Classification | Tonnes(Mt) | HM Tonnes(Mt) | HM(%) | Slimes(%) | Oversize(%) | Mineral Assemblage as % of HM | EFRShare | |||||
| RL2002 outside MIN 5532 | ILM(%) | RUT(%) | LEUC(%) | ZIR(%) | MON(%) | XEN(%) | ||||||
| Proved | 152 | 9 | 5.6 | 7.1 | 18.8 | 31.3 | 9.4 | 18.2 | 21.1 | 1.8 | — | 3.2% |
| Probable | 364 | 15 | 4.1 | 13.7 | 15.7 | 32.8 | 7.5 | 19.3 | 17.1 | 1.6 | — | 3.2% |
| Proved + Probable | 516 | 24 | 4.6 | 11.7 | 16.6 | 32.3 | 8.2 | 18.9 | 18.6 | 1.7 | — | 3.2% |
| Classification | Tonnes(Mt) | HM Tonnes(Mt) | HM(%) | Slimes(%) | Oversize(%) | Mineral Assemblage as % of HM | EFRShare | |||||
| Total Donald Deposit | ILM(%) | RUT(%) | LEUC(%) | ZIR(%) | MON(%) | XEN(%) | ||||||
| Proved | 415 | 20 | 4.8 | 12.4 | 13.1 | 25.7 | 7.2 | 22.6 | 18.6 | 1.8 | — | 3.2% |
| Probable | 410 | 17 | 4.1 | 14.4 | 15.2 | 31.5 | 7.3 | 19.4 | 16.9 | 1.6 | — | 3.2% |
| Proved + Probable | 825 | 37 | 4.5 | 13.4 | 14.1 | 28.4 | 7.2 | 21.2 | 17.8 | 1.7 | — | 3.2% |
Notes:
The ore reserves given in this table conform to the JORC code of reporting and do not represent current Mineral Reserves under S-K 1300 or NI 43-101, nor is the Company treating these as current Mineral Reserves. These ore reserves are historical in nature and a Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the estimates as a current estimate of Mineral Reserves. Further drilling and data collection might not prove out the numbers in the table above.
A break-even cut-off has been applied defining any material with product values greater than the cost of processing ore.
Mining recovery and dilution have been applied to the figures above when estimating the mineral resource for the tenements listed above. However, no additional dilution or ore loss has been applied when converting the mineral resource to ore reserves.
The area is wholly within the mining license area MIN5532.
RUT (%) are a combination of rutile plus anatase.
Numbers might not add due to rounding.
During 2024, the primary work ongoing at Donald is additional drilling to collect samples for additional metallurgical test work. Sonic drilling was completed earlier this year to gather the necessary materials. The Company is performing some additional test work on the rare earth element concentrate (monazite + xenotime) to optimize the processing of that material at the Mill.
As of December 31, 2024, the total net book value attributable to the Donald Project and its associated equipment on the financial statements of Donald Project Party Ltd. was $50.6 million.
The Company's Planned Work
The Company is currently funding a Pre-Final Investment Decision (“FID”) budget to move Donald to FID. Ongoing work includes final permitting efforts, community engagement, final engineering design, and updating the JORC compliant Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves to S-K 1300 and NI 43-101 compliant Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. The Company plans to spend approximately AUD$22.3 million (approximately $13.9 million at December 31, 2024 exchange rates) during the Pre-FID period.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.