MVB FINANCIAL CORP

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MVB Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 12, 2025, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans

As described in Note 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements the Company’s allowance for credit losses on loans (“ACL-Loans”) was $19.7 million as of December 31, 2024. The Company determines the current expected credit losses using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, related to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Adjustments to modeled loss estimates may be made for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency level, or term, as well as for changes in environmental conditions, such as changes in economic conditions, property values or other relevant factors. The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually analyzed using either collateral based or cash flow-based valuation methodology. The general component covers all loans that are not individually analyzed. These loans are measured on a collective basis and are pooled with other loans that share similar characteristics. Management has determined there to be several different portfolio segments sharing similar risk characteristics within the loan portfolio. Factors considered in this process include general loan terms, collateral, and availability of historical data to support the analysis, with the initial segmentation based on call report loan codes.

The ACL-Loans is calculated for each segment primarily using a discounted cash flow methodology at the loan level, with loss rates, prepayment assumptions and curtailment assumptions driven by each loan’s collateral type.

Certain qualitative factors are evaluated to determine additional inherent risks in the loan portfolio, which are not necessarily reflected in the loss forecasting models. These factors are then added to the forecasted allocation percentages to get the adjusted factor to be applied to the pooled loans on a weighted basis.

We identified the Company’s estimate of the qualitative factor adjustments applied in the calculation of the ACL-Loans as a critical audit matter. The principal considerations for our determination included the high degree of judgment and subjectivity related to management’s determination of the qualitative factor assumptions used in the calculation of the ACL-Loans. Due to the lack of observable data to support the qualitative factor allocations, a high degree of auditor effort and significant auditor judgement is required.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

/s/ Forvis Mazars, LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

Tampa, Florida

March 12, 2025

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Opinion on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited MVB Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and 2023, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and our report dated March 12, 2025, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definitions and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of reliable financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Forvis Mazars, LLP

Tampa, Florida

March 12, 2025

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2024 and 2023

Consolidated Statements of Income

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Dollars in thousands)

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in thousands)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business and Organization

MVB Financial Corp. is a financial holding company organized in 2003 as a West Virginia corporation that operates principally through its wholly-owned subsidiary, MVB Bank, Inc. (the “Bank”). The Bank’s consolidated subsidiaries include MVB Edge Ventures, LLC (“Edge Ventures”), Paladin Fraud, LLC (“Paladin Fraud”) and MVB Insurance, LLC, (“MVB Insurance”). The Bank owns a controlling interest in Trabian Technology, Inc. (“Trabian”). Edge Ventures wholly-owns Victor Technologies, Inc. (“Victor”) and MVB Technology, LLC ("MVB Technology"). The Bank also owns an equity method investment in Intercoastal Mortgage Company, LLC (“ICM”) and MVB Financial Corp. owns equity method investments in Warp Speed Holdings, LLC (“Warp Speed”) and Ayers Socure II, LLC (“Ayers Socure II”). MVB Financial's consolidated subsidiaries also includes SPE PR, LLC.

Through our professional services entities, which include Paladin Fraud and Trabian, we provide consulting solutions to assist Fintech and corporate clients in building digital products and meeting their fraud defense needs.

We conduct a wide range of business activities through the Bank, primarily commercial and retail (“CoRe”) banking services, as well as Fintech banking.

CoRe Banking

We offer our customers a full range of products and services including:

Fintech Banking

We provide innovative strategies to independent banking and corporate clients throughout the United States. Our dedicated Fintech team specializes in providing banking services to corporate Fintech clients, primarily focusing on operational risk management and compliance. Managing banking relationships with clients in the gaming, payments and banking-as-a-service industries is complex, from an operational and regulatory perspective. Due to this complexity, a limited number of banking institutions serve these industries, which can result in a lack of quality focus on these entities, providing us with an expanded pool of potential customers. When serviced safely and efficiently, we believe these industries provide a source of stable, lower-cost deposits and noninterest, fee-based income. We thoroughly analyze each industry in which our customers operate, as well as any new products or services provided, from an operational and regulatory perspective.

Edge Ventures

Edge Ventures, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, was created as a management company to provide oversight, alignment and structure for our Fintech companies and allocate resources to help incubate venture businesses and technologies acquired and developed by us.

Victor

Victor, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Edge Ventures, was formed to develop technology to make it faster, easier and cost effective to launch and scale a broad spectrum of solutions for the gaming, payments and banking-as-a-service sectors. Victor integrates directly with legacy bank core systems allowing developers to build solutions for clients to store, manage and move money securely with application programming interfaces. Victor’s payment solution provides a real-time sub-ledger that communicates with the client’s core banking system.

Professional Services

Paladin Fraud

Paladin Fraud, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, provides an extensive and customizable suite of fraud prevention services for merchants, credit agencies, Fintech companies and other vendors to help clients and partners defend against threats.

Trabian

Trabian builds digital products and web and mobile applications for forward-thinking community banks, credit unions, digital banks and Fintech companies. Consistent with the Bank's mission to pursue technology to accelerate community finance, Trabian has created technology platforms that have been instrumental to the success of many of today’s leading Fintech companies.

As of December 31, 2024, the Bank owned an 80.8% interest in Trabian and consolidated 100% of Trabian within the consolidated financial statements. In December 2024, the Board of Directors and Finance Committee approved a plan to sell the Bank's controlling interest in Trabian, and as such, Trabian's assets and liabilities were classified as held-for-sale on the consolidated balance sheet as December 31, 2024. In January 2025, we entered into a stock repurchase agreement with Trabian in which Trabian repurchased all the shares held by MVB. To facilitate a transition of the Trabian services and support the onboarding and conversion of systems, we entered into a 90-day transition services agreement, whereby we provided the purchaser with finance and accounting, human capital, information technology and record/data retention services. In addition, we entered into a contract with Trabian to continue to receive services and support with a monthly subscription model.

As a result of the transaction, we will no longer consolidate Trabian in our financial statements. Refer to Note 24 – Acquisitions and Divestitures.

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements are consolidated to include the accounts of MVB and its subsidiaries, including the Bank and the Bank’s subsidiaries. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial statements for interim periods in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) as presented through the Financial Accounting Statement Board's ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") and with rules and interpretive guidance of the Security and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidated financial statements.

Wholly-owned investments or investments in which we have a controlling financial interest, whether majority owned or in certain circumstances a minority interest, are required to be consolidated into our financial statements. We evaluate investments in entities on an ongoing basis to determine the need to consolidate.

As of December 31, 2024, the Bank owned an 80.8% controlling interest in Trabian and consolidated 100% of Trabian within the consolidated financial statements. The remaining interests of Trabian are accounted for separately as noncontrolling interest within our consolidated financial statements. Noncontrolling interest represents the portion of ownership and profit or loss that is attributable to the minority owners of this entity.

Unconsolidated investments where we have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the respective investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Those investments that are not consolidated or accounted for using the equity method of accounting are accounted for under cost or fair value accounting. For investments accounted for under the equity method, we record our investment in non-consolidated affiliates and the portion of income or loss in equity in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates. We periodically evaluate these investments for impairment. As of December 31, 2024, we hold three equity method investments. Refer to Note 5 – Equity Method Investments for further information.

Preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are based upon the best available information and actual results could differ from those estimates. An estimate that is particularly significant to the consolidated financial statements relates to the determination of the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”).

In certain instances, amounts reported in prior periods’ consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

We have evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or disclosure through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include cash on hand, non-interest and interest-bearing deposits with banks. Interest-bearing deposits with original maturities of 90 days or less are considered cash equivalents. Net cash flows are reported in the consolidated statement of cash flows for loans, deposits and short-term borrowing transactions. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 there wasno restricted cash.

Investment Securities

Investment securities at the time of purchase are classified as one of the following:

Available-for-Sale Securities - Includes debt that will be held for indefinite periods of time. These securities may be sold in response to changes in market interest or prepayment rates, needs for liquidity and changes in the availability of and yield of alternative investments. Such securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, net of estimated income tax effect. The income tax effect is released when the securities are sold.

Equity Securities - Includes equity securities that are adjusted to fair value on a monthly basis, with the change in value recorded directly on the income statement. We have elected to measure the equity securities without readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes for underlying transactions for identical or similar investments of new issues.

The amortized cost of investment in debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, computed by a method that results in a level yield. Gains and losses on the sale of investment securities are computed on the basis of specific identification of the adjusted cost of each security.

Our investment portfolio includes securities that are in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2024. We evaluate available-for-sale debt securities to determine whether the unrealized loss is due to credit-related factors or non-credit-related factors. When determining the ACL on securities, we consider such factors as adverse conditions specifically related to a certain security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area, the time frame securities have been in an unrealized loss position, our ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in value, whether or not the security has been downgraded by a rating agency and whether or not the financial condition of the security issuer has severely deteriorated.

When debt securities are in an unrealized loss position, we first assess whether we intend to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the security’s amortized cost basis is written down to fair value through income. Debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria are evaluated to determine whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, management considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that an ACL exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an ACL is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an ACL is recognized in other comprehensive income. Changes in the allowance are recorded as provision for, or reversal of, credit loss expense. Losses are charged against the ACL when management believes the uncollectibility of an available-for-sale security is confirmed or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met. Securities are charged-off against the ACL or, in the absence of any ACL, written down through income when deemed uncollectible by management or when either of the aforementioned criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met.

The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Pittsburgh, and as such, is required to maintain a minimum investment in stock of the FHLB that varies with the level of advances outstanding with the FHLB. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Bank holds $2.0 million and $2.1 million of stock, respectively, which is included in accrued interest receivable and other assets. The stock is bought from and sold to the FHLB based upon its $100 per share par value. The stock does not have a readily determinable fair value and as such is classified as restricted stock, carried at cost and evaluated by management for impairment. The stock’s value is determined by the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines. The determination of whether the par value will ultimately be recovered is influenced by criteria such as the following: (i) a significant decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount and the length of time this situation has persisted; (ii) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance; (iii) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the customer base of the FHLB; and (iv) the liquidity position of the FHLB. Management evaluated the stock and concluded that the stock was not impaired for the periods presented herein.

Management considered that the FHLB’s regulatory capital ratios have improved in the most recent quarters, no issues of liquidity are evident, new shares of FHLB stock continue to trade at the $100 per share par value and the FHLB has repurchased shares of excess capital stock from its members during 2024 and 2023.

Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses

Our methodology for determining the ACL is based on the requirements of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 326 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses ("ASC 326"). Loans are stated at amortized cost basis reduced by an ACL. Loans are considered non-accrual when scheduled principal or interest payments are 90 days past due unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Interest income on loans is recognized on an accrual basis. The ACL is maintained at a level deemed adequate to absorb forecasted losses over the remaining life of each loan within the portfolio. We consistently apply a quarterly loan review process to continually evaluate loans for changes in credit risk. This process serves as the primary means by which we evaluate the adequacy of the ACL, and is based upon periodic review of the collectability of loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually analyzed using either collateral based or cash flow based valuation methodology. The general component covers all loans that are not individually analyzed. These loans are measured on a collective basis and are pooled with other loans that share similar characteristics. Management has determined there to be several different portfolio segments sharing similar risk characteristics within the loan portfolio. Factors considered in this process include general loan terms, collateral and availability of historical data to support the analysis, with the initial segmentation based on call report loan codes.

The ACL is calculated for each segment using a discounted cash flow methodology at the loan level, with loss rates, prepayment assumptions and curtailment assumptions driven by each loan’s collateral type. The consumer loan segment uses a remaining life methodology using straight-line amortization over the remaining life of the portfolio, due to unique characteristics of this pool. Through a loss driver analysis, a forecasting model that correlates specific economic factors with credit quality of each loan segment was developed. Peer bank data was identified and used in this process, as we did not have adequate quarterly loan data to analyze over the look-back period to 2007. After analyzing both historical peer loan data and various economic factors over the same look-back period, two economic variables, national GDP and national unemployment rate, were identified as showing the most correlation to the performance of the loans within each of the pooled segments. Within each loan segment forecast, these two economic variables are forecasted based on expected trends over a 12-month period, before reverting to the long-term average quarterly rate of each variable over the next 12-month period, then maintains this quarterly average for the life of the loan segment. These variables are used to produce an estimated probability of default for each quarter period and, through a proprietary model, also calculate a loss given default factor to estimate overall losses. Benchmark studies are prepared for prepayment and curtailment rate estimates for each loan segment, as well as recovery lag estimates. With all these factors combined, a forecasted allocation rate is produced for each loan segment.

Certain qualitative factors are evaluated to determine additional inherent risks in the loan portfolio, which are not necessarily reflected in the loss forecasting models. These factors are then added to the forecasted allocation percentages to get the adjusted factor to be applied to the pooled loans on a weighted basis. The following qualitative factors are analyzed:

We analyze our loan portfolio each quarter to determine the appropriateness of our ACL.

A loan that has deteriorated and requires additional collection efforts by the Bank could warrant non-accrual status. A thorough review is presented to the Chief Credit Officer and/or the Special Assets Review Committee (“SARC”), as required with respect to any loan which is in a collection process and to make a determination as to whether the loan should be placed on non-accrual status. The placement of loans on non-accrual status is subject to applicable regulatory restrictions and guidelines. Generally, loans should be placed in non-accrual status when the loan reaches 90 days past due, when it becomes likely the borrower cannot or will not make scheduled principal or interest payments, when full repayment of principal and interest is not expected, or when the loan displays potential loss characteristics. Normally, all accrued interest is reversed against interest income when a loan is placed in non-accrual status, unless Management believes it is likely the accrued interest will be collected. Any payments subsequently received are applied to principal. To remove a loan from non-accrual status, all principal and interest due must be paid up to date and the Bank is reasonably sure of future satisfactory payment performance. Usually, this requires a six-month recent history of payments due. Removal of a loan from non-accrual status will require the approval of the Chief Credit Officer and/or SARC.

Loans are moved to individual analysis when, based on current information and events, the loan no longer exhibits similar risk characteristics as its pool, and we analyze the loan individually on a collateral or cash flow basis. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. We also separately evaluate consumer loans for individual analysis. Loans are identified individually by monitoring the delinquency status of the Bank’s portfolio. Once identified, the Bank’s ongoing communications with the borrower allow evaluation of the significance of the payment delays and the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower. When Bank management determines that foreclosure is probable or when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty at the reporting date and repayment is expected to be substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral, expected credit losses are based on the fair value of the collateral at the reporting date, adjusted for selling costs as appropriate.

To estimate the liability for off-balance sheet credit exposures, management analyzes the portfolios of unfunded commitments based on the same segmentation used for the ACL calculation. The estimated funding rate for each segment was derived from a funding rate study created by a third-party vendor, which analyzed funding of various loan types over time to develop industry benchmarks at the call report code level. Once the estimated future advances were calculated, the allocation rate applicable to that portfolio segment was applied in the same manner as those used for the ACL calculation. The resulting estimated loss allocations were totaled to determine the liability for unfunded commitments related to these loans, which management considers necessary to anticipate potential losses on those commitments that have a reasonable probability of funding.

Once the determination has been made that a loan is to be individually analyzed, the amount of potential credit loss is measured using one oftwo valuation methods: (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; or (ii) the fair value of the collateral less selling costs. The method is selected on a loan-by-loan basis, with management primarily utilizing the fair value of collateral method. The evaluation of the need and amount of a specific allocation of the allowance and whether a loan can be removed from individual analysis status is made on a quarterly basis.

We defer loan origination and commitment fees and direct loan origination costs and the net amount is amortized as an adjustment of the related loan’s yield.

Loans Held-for-Sale

Loans originated or purchased with the intent to sell are designated as held-for-sale. Loans held-for-sale are carried at fair value, which is determined using quoted secondary market prices or investor commitments when possible. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan, which would be used by other market participants. If the fair value at the reporting date exceeds the amortized cost of a loan, the loan is reported at amortized cost. Loans are occasionally transferred between the held-for-sale and held-for-investment classifications based on management’s intent and ability to hold or sell loan, which may be impacted by secondary market conditions, loan credit quality or other factors.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation, while land is carried at cost. Depreciation expense is computed by the straight-line-method based on the estimated useful lives of assets, which range from seven to 40 years for buildings, three to 10 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment, three years for software and lesser of useful life or lease term for leasehold improvements.

Software Development

Software that we develop for internal use may be capitalized when costs are incurred after the preliminary project stage has ended and the application development stage begins. The application development stage includes designing, coding, installing and testing the software. Once the software has been implemented, costs for training and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Capitalized internal use software development costs are included in premises and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance

Bank-owned life insurance represents life insurance on the lives of certain of our employees who have provided positive consent allowing us to be the beneficiary of such policies. These policies are recorded at their cash surrender value or the amount that can be realized upon surrender of the policy. Income from these policies is not subject to income taxes and is recorded as noninterest income.

Equity Method Investments

Investments in companies in which we have significant influence over the operating and financing decisions are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Determining if we have significant influence requires judgement based on the facts and circumstances of each investment including level of ownership, legal structure and other qualitative factors which impact our ability to influence the investee's operations, and we review the facts and circumstances each reporting period to determine if we still have significant influence. Equity method investments are recorded initially at cost including costs to acquire the investment. These investments are included in the equity method investments line item on the consolidated balance sheets. We recognize our proportionate share of the investee's profits and losses in the equity method investments income line item. At the time of investment, we may make a one-time election to record our proportionate share of earnings of the investee on a lag of no more than three months. This election may be made on an investment by investment basis. We review equity method investments for impairment if there are events or changes in circumstances which indicate the carrying amount of the investment might not be recoverable.

Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Goodwill is the purchase premium after adjusting for the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized, but is reviewed for potential impairment on an annual basis, or when events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment, at the related reporting unit level. The goodwill impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired; however, if the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge must be recorded. An impairment loss recognized cannot exceed the amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit. An impairment loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill and subsequent reversals of goodwill impairment losses are not permitted under applicable accounting guidance.

For intangible assets subject to amortization, the recoverability test is performed when a triggering event occurs and an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds fair value and is not recoverable. The carrying value of the intangible asset is considered not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset. Intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives are not subject to amortization. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying value of the intangible asset with an indefinite life exceeds its fair value.

Derivative Instruments

Interest Rate Swaps

We entered into interest rate swap agreements to facilitate the risk management strategies of a small number of commercial banking clients. We mitigate this risk by entering into equal and offsetting interest rate swap agreements with highly rated third-party financial institutions. The interest rate swap agreements are free-standing derivatives and are recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet. Fair value changes are recorded in noninterest income in our consolidated statement of income.

Fair Value Hedges

We entered into portfolio layer method fair value swaps, designated as hedging instruments, to mitigate the effect of changing interest rates on the fair values of certain designated fixed-rate loans and available-for-sale securities. This involves the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed payments over the life of the agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. Under the portfolio layer method, the hedged items are designated as a hedged layer of closed portfolios of financial loans and municipal bonds that are anticipated to remain outstanding for the designated hedged periods. Adjustments are made to record the swaps at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets, with changes in fair value recognized in interest income. The carrying values of the fair value swaps on the consolidated balance sheets are also adjusted through interest income and other comprehensive income, based on changes in fair value attributable to changes in the hedged risk.

Embedded Derivatives

We enter into various contracts through the normal course of business and occasionally a contract may include terms and conditions that create an embedded derivative. An embedded derivative may occur even though the purpose of the contract is not intended to be a derivative contract. Components of a contract should be assessed to determine if they meet the definition of a derivative. If it does, we must then assess whether the embedded derivative is clearly and closely related to its host instrument. If the derivative is not clearly and closely related to the host contract, the embedded derivative must be separated from the host instrument and accounted for as a separate derivative.

Servicing Assets

Servicing assets are recorded when the Bank sells loans and retains the servicing on those loans. On a monthly basis, we track the amount of loans that are sold with servicing retained. We determine the servicing rights value, which is then recorded as an asset and amortized over the period of estimated net servicing revenues. The servicing assets are evaluated for impairment quarterly. Servicing loans for others generally consists of collecting payments from borrowers, maintaining escrow accounts, remitting payments to third-party investors and, when necessary, foreclosure processing. Serviced loans are not included in the consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the value of servicing assets was $1.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively, which is included in accrued interest receivable and other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

We have the ability to sell the guaranteed portion of loans originated through the SBA's 7(a) program. All SBA loan sales are executed on a servicing retained basis. We are required to retain a minimum of 10% of the principal balance in accordance with SBA regulations. Any gain on sale recognized as income is the sum of the premium on the guaranteed portion of the loan and the fair value of the servicing assets recognized, less the discount recorded on the unguaranteed portion of the loan that is retained. The remaining unguaranteed portion of the loan is presented net of the discount, which is recognized as interest income over the underlying loan's remaining term, using the effective interest method.

Foreclosed Assets Held for Resale

Foreclosed assets held for resale acquired in satisfaction of mortgage obligations and in foreclosure proceedings are recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs at the time of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis, with any valuation adjustments charged to the ACL. In subsequent periods, foreclosed assets are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less any costs to sell.

Costs relating to improvement of the property are capitalized, while holding costs of the property are charged to other loan origination and maintenance expense in the period incurred. Subsequent declines in fair value and gains or losses on sale are recorded in other noninterest expense and included in accrued interest receivable and other assets in the consolidated balance sheet.

Fair Value Measurements

Accounting standards require that we adopt fair value measurement for financial assets and financial liabilities. This enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities applies whenever other standards require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. This guidance does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances.

The following summarizes the methods and significant assumptions we use in estimating our fair value disclosures for financial instruments.

Transfers of assets and liabilities between levels within the fair value hierarchy are recognized when an event or change in circumstances occurs.

Revenue Recognition

We record revenue from contracts with customers in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Under ASC 606, we must identify the contract with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation. Significant revenue has not been recognized in the current reporting period that results from performance obligations satisfied in previous periods.

Our primary sources of revenue are derived from interest and fees earned on loans, investment securities and other financial instruments, which are not within the scope of ASC 606. We have evaluated the nature of our contracts with customers and determined that our revenue from contracts with customers is appropriately disaggregated in our consolidated statement of income is not currently necessary. We generally fully satisfy our performance obligations on our contracts with customers as services are rendered and the transaction prices are typically fixed within each contract, charged either on a periodic basis or based on activity. Because performance obligations are satisfied as services are rendered and the transaction prices are fixed, there is little judgment involved in applying ASC 606 that significantly affects the determination of the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with customers. Contract liabilities, which primarily relate to consulting income contracts, are included in accrued interest payable and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

The following table summarizes the value of contract liabilities at December 31, 2024 and 2023:

Payment Card and Service Charge Income

Payment card and service charge income are comprised of service charges on accounts and interchange and debit card transaction fees. Service charges on accounts consist of account analysis fees, monthly service fees, check orders and other account related fees. Our performance obligation for account analysis fees and monthly service fees is generally satisfied and the related revenue recognized, over the period in which the service is provided. Check orders and other account related fees are largely transactional based and therefore, our performance obligation is satisfied and related revenue recognized, at a point in time. Payment for service charges on accounts is primarily received immediately or in the following month through a direct charge to customers’ accounts.

Interchange and debit card transaction fees are primarily comprised of interchange fees earned whenever the Bank’s debit and credit cards are processed through card payment networks. The Bank’s performance obligation for debit card and interchange income is generally satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, on a transactional basis. Payment is typically received immediately or in the following month. We also enter into interchange arrangements with minimum commitment fees. Minimum commitment fees are recognized ratably, until such time that minimum commitment fees are exceeded or expected to be exceeded.

Compliance and Consulting Income

Compliance and consulting income is comprised revenue generated by Paladin Fraud and Trabian. Paladin Fraud provides an extensive and customizable suite of fraud prevention services for merchants, credit agencies, Fintech companies and other vendors to help clients and partners defend against threats. Trabian provides consulting for the development of online and mobile banking platforms and digital products for Fintech companies. Paladin Fraud and Trabian account for a contract after it has been approved by all parties to the arrangement, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable. The services promised are then evaluated in each contract at inception to determine whether the contract should be accounted for as having one or more performance obligations. Paladin Fraud and Trabian's services included in our contracts are distinct from one another. The transaction price for each contract is determined based upon the consideration expected to be received for the distinct services being provided under the contract. Revenue is recognized as performance obligations are satisfied and the customer obtains control of the goods or services provided. In determining when performance obligations are satisfied, factors considered include contract terms, payment terms and whether there is an alternative future use of the product or service. Consulting engagements may vary in length and scope, but will generally include the review and/or preparation of regulatory filings, business plans, financial models and other risk management services to customers within financial industries. Revenue from consulting services is recognized on a pro rata basis based upon actual labor hours completed as compared to budgeted labor hours for the deliverable.

Other Operating Income

Other operating income is primarily comprised of ATM fees, wire transfer fees, travelers check fees, revenue streams such as safe deposit box rental fees and other miscellaneous service charges. ATM fees, wire transfer fees and travelers check fees are primarily generated when a Bank’s cardholder uses a non-Bank ATM or a non-Bank cardholder uses a Bank ATM. Safe deposit box rental fees are charged to the customer on an annual basis and recognized upon receipt of payment. The Bank determined that since rentals and renewals occur fairly consistently over time, revenue is recognized on a basis consistent with the duration of the performance obligation. Other service charges include revenue from processing wire transfers, bill pay service, cashier’s checks and other services. The Bank’s performance obligations for fees and other service charges are largely satisfied, and related revenue recognized, when the services are rendered. Payment is typically received immediately or in the following month. The Bank’s performance obligation for the gains and losses on sales of other real estate owned is satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, after each sale of other real estate owned is closed. Additionally, other operating income includes software-as-a-service fee income from Victor. This revenue stream is facilitated through hosting agreements that provide clients of Victor with access to Victor's embedded payments management platform. The performance obligation is satisfied over time, and therefore software-as-a-service fee income is recognized over the life of the contract.

Stock-Based Compensation

Compensation cost is recognized for stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), including time- and performance-based RSUs, issued to employees, based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options. Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Any compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards is reversed at the time of forfeiture.

Comprehensive Income

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, minimum pension liability and investment hedges, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the consolidated balance sheets, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.

Income Taxes

The amount reflected as income taxes represents federal and state income taxes on financial statement income. Certain items of income and expense, primarily the provision for credit losses, allowance for losses on foreclosed assets held for resale, depreciation and accretion of discounts on investment securities are reported in different accounting periods for income tax purposes. We and the Bank file a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based on the difference between the financial statement basis and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rates. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the net deferred tax asset or liability from period to period. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the result of timing differences in recognition of revenue and expense for income tax and financial statement purposes. No deferred income tax valuation allowance is provided since it is more likely than not that realization of the deferred income tax asset will occur in future years.

We prescribe a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Benefits from tax positions should be recognized in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions that previously failed to meet the more likely than not recognition threshold should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet the more likely than not recognition threshold should be reversed in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer met. There is currentlyno liability for uncertain tax positions andno known unrecognized tax benefits. With limited exception, our federal and state income tax returns for taxable years through 2020 have been closed for purposes of examination by the federal and state taxing jurisdictions.

Operating Segments

An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise that engages in business activities that generates revenue and incurs expense, and the operating results of which are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in the determination of resource allocation and performance. While our chief decision makers monitor the revenue streams of our various products and services, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a company-wide basis. We have identified three reportable segments: CoRe Banking, Mortgage Banking and Financial Holding Company.

Transfers of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when: (i) the assets have been isolated from us, (ii) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets and (iii) we do not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. The amendments provide optional expedients and exceptions for certain contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of rate reform. In December 2022, the FASB issued ASC 2022-06, Deferral of the Sunset Date of Topic 848, which extends the sunset date of Topic 848 from December 31, 2022, to December 31, 2024. The guidance permits entities to not apply modification accounting or remeasure lease payments in lease contracts if the changes to the contract are related to the discontinuation of the reference rate. If certain criteria are met, the amendments also allow exceptions to the de-designation criteria of the hedging relationship and the assessment of hedge effectiveness during the transition period. In January 2021, ASU 2021-01 was issued by the FASB and clarifies that certain exceptions in reference rate reform apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. As of December 31, 2024, all loans and other relevant financial instruments that referenced LIBOR have been transitioned to the SOFR.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The amendments require disaggregated information about a reporting entity's effect tax rate reconciliation as well as information on income taxes paid. Public business entities will be required to disclose additional information in specified categories with respect to the reconciliation of the effective tax rat to the statutory rate for federal, state and foreign income taxes. The amendments also require greater detail about individual reconciling items in the rate reconciliation to the extent that the impact of those items exceeds a specified threshold. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. We are currently evaluating the impact these changes may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-01, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope Application of Profits Interest and Similar Awards. The amendments clarify how an entity determines whether a profits interest or similar award is (i) within the scope of Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) or (ii) not a share-based payment arrangements and therefore within the scope of other guidance. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. We do not currently expect these amendments to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40). The amendments improve the disclosures about a public business entity’s expenses and address requests from investors for more detailed information about the types of expenses (including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, amortization and depletion) in commonly presented expense captions (such as cost of sales and research and development). The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. We are currently evaluating the impact these changes may have on our consolidated financial statements.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement

In January 2023, we adopted ASC 326. ASC 326 replaced the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. GAAP with an expected credit loss methodology and required consideration of a broader range of information to determine credit loss estimates. Financial assets measured at amortized cost are presented at the net amount expected to be collected by using an ACL. Purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans received an allowance account at the acquisition date that represents a component of the purchase price allocation. Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities are recorded through an ACL, with such allowance limited to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost. We adopted ASC 326 using the modified retrospective method for loans, leases and off-balance sheet credit exposures. Adoption of this guidance resulted in a $10.0 million increase in the ACL, comprised of increases in the ACL for loans of $8.9 million and the ACL for unfunded commitments of $1.1 million, with $1.2 million of the increase reclassified from the amortized cost basis of PCD financial assets. This increase was offset by $2.1 million related to tax effect, resulting in a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings of $6.6 million.

In June 2023, we adopted ASU 2022-01, Fair Value Hedging – Portfolio Layer Method, upon entering into an interest rate swap to hedge the fair value of fixed rate mortgages included in a closed portfolio for changes in the daily secured overnight financing rate ("SOFR") benchmark interest rate component of the mortgages. This ASU amends the guidance in ASU 2017-12 and expands what it now calls the portfolio layer method (previously the last-of-layer method) to allow entities to hedge multiple layers of a closed portfolio of assets. It also allows for the use of an amortizing notional swap when entering into a portfolio layer method hedge. Thus, an interest rate swap is considered a hedge of a single layer of the closed portfolio of fixed rate loans. We applied this ASU to the derivatives we entered into during 2023 as further described in Note 19 – Derivatives.

In December 2024, we adopted ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segments Disclosures. The amendments are intended to improve reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. In addition, the amendments clarify circumstances in which an entity can disclose multiple segment measures of profit or loss and provide new segment disclosure requirements for entities with a single reportable segment. The amendments are effective for Annual Reports on Form 10-K for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023. We applied this ASU to our segment disclosures as further described in Note 22 – Segment Reporting.

Note 2 – Investment Securities

Amortized cost and fair values of investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2024 are summarized as follows:

Amortized cost and fair values of investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2023 are summarized as follows:

The following table summarizes amortized cost and fair values of debt securities by maturity:

The table above reflects contractual maturities. Actual results will differ as the loans underlying the mortgage-backed securities may repay sooner than scheduled.

Investment securities with a carrying value of $247.4 million and $223.4 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, were pledged to secure public funds, repurchase agreements and potential borrowings at the Federal Reserve discount window.

Our investment portfolio includes securities that are in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2024. We evaluate available-for-sale debt securities to determine whether the unrealized loss is due to credit-related factors or non-credit-related factors. When determining the ACL on securities, we consider such factors as adverse conditions specifically related to a certain security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area, our ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in value, whether or not the security has been downgraded by a rating agency and whether or not the financial condition of the security issuer has severely deteriorated.

The following table summarizes the activity in the ACL related to available-for-sale debt securities during the twelve months ended December 31, 2024. There was no activity in the ACL related to available-for-sale debt securities during the twelve months ended December 31, 2023.

Although the available-for-sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position would result in a pretax loss of $34.1 million if sold at December 31, 2024, we have no intent to sell the applicable securities at such fair values, and maintain that we have the ability to hold these securities until all principal has been recovered. It is more likely than not that we will not, for liquidity purposes, sell any securities at a loss. Declines in the fair values of these securities can be attributed to general market conditions, which reflect the prospect for the economy as a whole, rather than credit-related conditions. Therefore, we haveno ACL as of December 31, 2024.

The following tables show available-for-sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position for which an ACL has not been recorded as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous loss position:

The following table summarizes the investment sales and related gains and losses in 2024, 2023 and 2022:

Note 3 – Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses

The components of loans in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, were as follows:

Loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The amortized cost basis of loans serviced for others requiring recognition of a servicing asset were $171.6 million and $184.3 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

We currently manage our loan portfolios and the respective exposure to credit losses (credit risk) by the specific portfolio segments shown below. Our loan portfolio segmentation is based primarily on call report codes, which are levels at which we develop and document our systematic methodology to determine the ACL attributable to each respective portfolio segment. The ACL portfolio segments are aggregated into broader segments in order to present informative yet concise disclosures within this document, as follows:

Commercial business loans– Commercial business loans are made to provide funds for equipment and general corporate needs, as well as to finance owner-occupied real estate, and to finance future cash flows of Federal government lease contracts. Repayment of these loans primarily uses the funds obtained from the operation of the borrower’s business. Commercial business loans also include lines of credit that are utilized to finance a borrower’s short-term credit needs and/or to finance a percentage of eligible receivables and inventory. This segment includes both internally originated and purchased participation loans. Credit risk arises from the successful operation of the business, which may be affected by competition, rising interest rates, regulatory changes and adverse conditions in the local and regional economy. Commercial business loans include the following ACL segments: commercial and industrial (including both healthcare and SBA subsegments), commercial real estate owner-occupied (including both healthcare and SBA subsegments), government leases and other loans.

Commercial real estate loans – Commercial real estate loans consist of non-owner occupied properties, such as investment properties for retail, office and multifamily with a history of occupancy and cash flow. This segment includes both internally originated and purchased participation loans. These loans carry the risk of adverse changes in the local economy and a tenant’s deteriorating credit strength, lease expirations in soft markets and sustained vacancies, which can adversely impact cash flow. Commercial real estate loans include the following ACL segments: commercial real estate non-owner occupied (including both healthcare and SBA subsegments).

Commercial acquisition, development and construction loans – Commercial acquisition, development and construction loans are intended to finance the construction of commercial and residential properties, and also includes loans for the acquisition and development of land. Construction loans represent a higher degree of risk than permanent real estate loans and may be affected by a variety of factors such as the borrower’s ability to control costs and adhere to time schedules and the risk that the market may not absorb constructed units within the anticipated time frame or at the anticipated price. The loan commitment on these loans often includes an interest reserve that allows the lender to periodically advance loan funds to pay interest charges on the outstanding balance of the loan. Commercial acquisition, development and construction loans include the following ACL segments: other construction (including an SBA subsegment).

Residential real estate– This residential real estate segment contains permanent and construction mortgage loans principally to consumers, but also includes loans to residential real estate developers, secured by residential real estate, which we previously presented under commercial acquisitions, development and construction loans under the incurred loss model. Residential real estate loans to consumers are evaluated for the adequacy of repayment sources at the time of approval, based upon measures including credit scores, debt-to-income ratios and collateral values. Credit risk arises from the continuing financial stability of the borrower and, where applicable, the builder, which can be adversely impacted by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy, among other factors. Residential real estate secured loans to developers represent a higher degree of risk than permanent real estate loans and may be affected by a variety of factors such as the borrower’s ability to control costs and adhere to time schedules and the risk that the market may not absorb constructed units within the anticipated time frame or at the anticipated price. Also impacting credit risk would be a shortfall in the value of the residential real estate in relation to the outstanding loan balance in the event of a default or subsequent liquidation of the real estate collateral. Residential real estate loans include the following ACL segments: residential and residential construction (including SBA subsegment).

Home equity lines of credit– This segment includes subsegments for senior lien and subordinate lien lines of credit. Credit risk is similar to residential real estate loans described above as it is subject to the borrower’s continuing financial stability and the value of the collateral securing the loan.

Consumer loans– This segment of loans includes primarily installment loans and personal lines of credit. Consumer loans include installment loans used by clients to purchase automobiles, boats and recreational vehicles. Credit risk is similar to residential real estate loans described above as it is subject to the borrower’s continuing financial stability and the value of the collateral securing the loan. This segment primarily includes loans purchased from a third-party originator that originates loans in order to finance the purchase of personal automotive vehicles. Credit risk is unique as this segment includes only those loans provided to consumers who cannot typically obtain financing through traditional lenders. As such, these loans are subject to a higher risk of default than the typical consumer loan. Consumer loans include the following ACL segments: subprime consumer automotive and consumer.

As of December 31, 2024, the Bank’s other real estate owned balance totaled $2.8 million. The other real estate owned balance consists oftwo unrelated residential mortgages with a balance of $2.3 million andone commercial loan from our acquisition of The First State Bank ("First State") in 2020 with a balance of $0.5 million. As of December 31, 2024, there were seven residential mortgages in the process of foreclosure with a loan balance totaling $3.1 million.

As of December 31, 2023, the Bank's other real estate owned balance totaled $0.8 million, all of which was related totwo unrelated commercial loans from our acquisition of First State in 2020. As of December 31, 2023, there were no residential mortgages in the process of foreclosure.

Bank management uses anine-point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The firstsix categories are considered not criticized and are aggregated as “Pass” rated. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions.

Loans categorized as “Pass” rated have adequate sources of repayment, with little identifiable risk of collection and general conformity to the Bank's policy requirements, product guidelines and underwriting standards. Any exceptions that are identified during the underwriting and approval process have been adequately mitigated by other factors.

Loans categorized as “Special Mention” rated have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose the institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

Loans categorized as “Substandard” rated are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Loans categorized as “Doubtful” rated have all the weakness inherent in those classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weakness makes collections or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently known facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. However, these loans are not yet rated as loss because certain events may occur which would salvage the debt.

Any portion of a loan that has been or is expected to be charged off is placed in the “Loss” category.

To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Bank has a structured loan rating process with several layers of internal and external oversight. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the Pass categories, unless a specific action, such as past due status, bankruptcy, repossession or death, occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event. The Bank’s Chief Credit Officer is responsible for the timely and accurate risk rating of the loans in the portfolio at origination and on an ongoing basis. The Bank's Credit Department ensures that a review of all commercial relationships of $1.0 million or more is performed annually.

Review of the appropriate risk grade is included in both the internal and external loan review process and on an ongoing basis. The Bank has an experienced credit department that continually reviews and assesses loans within the portfolio. The Bank engages an external consultant to conduct independent loan reviews on at least an annual basis. Generally, the external consultant reviews commercial relationships with the intent of reviewing 35% to 40% of the Bank's commercial outstanding loan balances on an annual basis. The Bank's credit department compiles detailed reviews, including plans for resolution, on loans classified as Substandard on a quarterly basis.

The following table presents the amortized cost of loans summarized by the aggregate Pass and the criticized categories of Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful within the internal risk rating system by vintage year as of the period shown:

Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the age of the portfolio as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due.

The following table presents the amortized cost basis in loans by aging category and accrual status as of the periods shown:

The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the loans' amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. Loans are charged off against the ACL when management believes the loan balance is uncollectible. Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses. Management determines the ACL balance using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Historical credit behaviors along with model judgments provide the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Adjustments to modeled loss estimates may be made for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency level or term, as well as for changes in environmental conditions, such as changes in economic conditions, property values or other relevant factors.

At December 31, 2024 and 2023, individually analyzed loans totaled $43.2 million and $11.8 million, respectively. A portion of the ACL of $1.3 million and $1.9 million was allocated to cover any loss in these loans at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent loans by class of loans as of the periods shown:

The Bank evaluates certain loans in homogeneous pools, rather than on an individual basis, when those loans are below specific thresholds based on outstanding principal balance. More specifically, residential mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit and consumer loans are evaluated collectively for expected credit losses by applying allocation rates derived from the Bank’s historical losses specific to these loans. The reserve was immaterial at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.

Management has identified a number of additional qualitative factors which it uses to supplement the estimated losses derived from the loss rate methodologies employed within the CECL model because these factors are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with the existing loan pools to differ from the loss rate methodologies. The additional factors that are evaluated quarterly and updated using information obtained from internal, regulatory and governmental sources are: lending policies and procedures, nature and volume of the portfolio, experience and ability of lending management and staff, volume and severity of problem credits, quality of the loan review system, changes in the value of underlying collateral, effect of concentrations of credit from a loan type, industry and/or geographic standpoint, changes in economic and business conditions, consumer sentiment and other external factors.

Bank management reviews the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis using a defined, consistently applied process in order to make appropriate and timely adjustments to the ACL. When information confirms all or part of specific loans to be uncollectible, these amounts are promptly charged off against the ACL.

The provision for credit losses related to unfunded commitments was $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 and the release of allowance related to unfunded commitments was $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The provision for credit losses related to unfunded commitments was immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2022.

The following table presents the balance and activity for the primary segments of the ACL as of the periods shown:

The ACL is based on estimates and actual losses will vary from current estimates. Management believes that the granularity of the portfolio segments, the related loss estimation methodologies and other qualitative factors, as well as the consistency in the application of assumptions, result in an ACL that is representative of the risk found in the components of the portfolio at any given date.

Loan Modifications for Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty

Occasionally, the Bank modifies loans to borrowers in financial distress by providing concessions that allow for the borrower to lower their payment obligations for a defined period, these may include, but are not limited to: principal forgiveness, payment delays, term extensions, interest rate reductions and any combinations of the preceding.

The following tables summarize the amortized cost basis of loans that were modified during the twelve months ended December 31, 2024:

The above table presents the amortized cost basis of loans that were experiencing financial difficulty and modified during the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, by class and by type of modification. Also presented above is the percentage of the amortized cost basis of loans that were modified to borrowers in financial distress as compared to the amortized cost basis of each class of financing receivable.

As of December 31, 2024, there were 21 loans to 20 borrowers that received payment delay modifications andone loan to a borrower receiving a term extension. These 22 total loans include 21 commercial loans with government guarantees totaling $4.8 million andone commercial loan secured by accounts receivable totaling $0.2 million.

As of December 31, 2023, there were 18 loans to 17 borrowers that received payment delay modifications, includingone secured by commercial office real estate totaling $11.2 million, one commercial loan secured by accounts receivable totaling $0.2 million, and 16 commercial loans with government guarantees totaling $8.3 million.

The Bank closely monitors the performance of loans that are modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty to understand the effectiveness of its modification efforts. The following table presents the performance of such loans that have been modified as of the period shown:

As of December 31, 2024, there arenine modified loans past due, with an amortized costs basis of $2.8 million. Allnine modified loans past due are commercial notes with government guarantees secured by business assets. Six of these notes are considered non-accrual as of December 31, 2024.

As of December 31, 2023, there areeight modified loans past due, with an amortized costs basis of $5.5 million. Of theeight modified loans past due, three are commercial notes to a single borrower totaling $1.7 million secured by equipment andfive commercial notes with government guarantees totaling $3.8 million. Alleight of these notes are considered non-accrual as of December 31, 2023.

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of loans that had a payment default and were modified prior to that default to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty as of the period shown:

As of December 31, 2024, there arefour modified loans that have defaulted, with an amortized costs basis of $1.0 million. These loans are commercial notes with government guarantees and are considered non-accrual as of December 31, 2024.

As of December 31, 2023, there aretwo modified loans that have defaulted, with an amortized costs basis of $2.6 million. These loans are commercial notes with government guarantees and both are considered non-accrual as of December 31, 2023.

Upon the Bank’s determination that a modified loan (or portion of a loan) has subsequently been deemed uncollectible, the loan (or a portion of the loan) is written-off. Therefore, the amortized cost basis of the loan is reduced by the uncollectible amount and the ACL is adjusted by the same amount.

Note 4 – Premises and Equipment

The following table presents the components of premises and equipment at December 31:

Depreciation expense totaled $3.8 million, $4.6 million and $4.4 million for 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

In December 2024, we completed a sale-leaseback transaction with a purchase price of $17.6 million. The sale was forfour branch locations and the initial lease term is 15 years. The sale-leaseback transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain on sale of assets of $11.8 million. Lease liabilities and right-of-use assets totaled $15.5 million for the sale-leaseback transaction and the amounts are included in the total lease liabilities and right-of-use assets discussed below.

We lease certain premises and equipment under operating and finance leases. At December 31, 2024, we had lease liabilities totaling $28.1 million and right-of-use assets totaling $26.9 million, substantially all of which was related to operating leases. At December 31, 2024, the weighted-average remaining lease term for operating leases was 12.8 years and the weighted-average discount rate used in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was 5.9%.

At December 31, 2023, we had lease liabilities totaling $14.0 million and right-of-use assets totaling $12.9 million, substantially all of which was related to operating leases. At December 31, 2023, the weighted-average remaining lease term for operating leases was 10.5 years, and the weighted-average discount rate used in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was 3.1%.

Lease liabilities and right-of-use assets are reflected inaccrued interest payable and other liabilities andaccrued interest receivable and other assets, respectively.

The following shows lease costs for the years ended:

There were no sale-leaseback transactions, leveraged leases or lease transactions with related parties during the year ended December 31, 2024.

For operating leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more as of December 31, 2024, the following table presents future minimum payments for the twelve month periods ended December 31:

Future minimum payments on finance leases were not material as of December 31, 2024.

Note 5 – Equity Method Investments

In accordance with Rules 3-09 and 4-08(g) of Regulation S-X, we must assess whether our equity method investments are significant. In evaluating the significance of these investments, we performed the income, investment and asset tests described in S-X 1-02(w) for each equity method investment. Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X requires separate audited financial statements of an equity method investee in an annual report if either the income or investment test exceeds 20%. Rule 4-08(g) of Regulation S-X requires summarized financial information for all equity method investees in an annual report if any of the equity method investees, individually or in the aggregate, result in any of the tests exceeding 10%.

Under the income test, our proportionate share of the revenue from equity method investments in the aggregate exceeded the applicable threshold under Rule 4-08(g) of 10% for the year ended December 31, 2024, accordingly, we are required to provide summarized income statement information for all investees for all periods presented. There were no equity method investments which met any of the applicable thresholds for reporting Rule 3-09 for reporting separate financial statements as of the year ended December 31, 2024.

Our equity method investments are initially recorded at cost, including transaction costs to obtain the equity method investment, and are subsequently adjusted for changes due to our share of the entities' earnings.

ICM

The following table provides summarized income statement information for ICM for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022:

Our ownership percentage of 40% of ICM allows us to have significant influence over the operations and decision making at ICM. Accordingly, the investment, which had acarrying value of $23.5 million at December 31, 2024, is accounted for as an equity method investment. Our share of net income from our investment in ICM was $0.4 million and $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2022, respectively, and our share of net loss was $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the mortgage pipeline was $482.4 million and $439.0 million, respectively.

Warp Speed

The following table presents summarized income statement information for our equity method investment in Warp Speed for the periods shown:

Our ownership percentage of 37.5% of Warp Speed, which we acquired in October 2022, allows us to have significant influence over its operations and decision making. Accordingly, the investment, which had a carrying value of $53.2 million at December 31, 2024, is accounted for as an equity method investment. At the time of acquisition, we made a policy election to record our proportionate share of net income of the investee on a three month lag. Our share of Warp Speed's net income for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 totaled $1.0 million and $2.7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the mortgage pipeline was $543.4 million and $267.8 million, respectively.

Ayers Socure II

Our ownership percentage of Ayers Socure II is 10% and it was determined that we have significant influence over the company. Accordingly, the investment, which had a carrying value of $1.5 million at December 31, 2024, is accounted for as an equity method investment. Our share of net income from Ayers Socure II for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 was not significant. The equity method investment in Ayers Socure II is not considered a significant investment based on the criteria of Rule 10-01(b)(1) of Regulation S-X.

Ayers Socure II's sole business is ownership of equity securities in Socure Inc. ("Socure"). In addition to our equity method investment in Ayers Socure II, we also have direct equity security ownership interest in Socure. With the combination of our investments in both Ayers Socure II and Socure directly, we own less than 1% of Socure in total.

Note 6 – Deposits

Deposits at December 31, were as follows:

Maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2024 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

As of December 31, 2024, overdrawn deposit accounts totaling $2.8 million were reclassified as loan balances.

Deposit Concentration

As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, $546.6 million and $606.9 million of deposits were with our three largest clients, respectively.

Note 7 – Borrowed Funds

The Bank is a member of the FHLB of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. As of December 31, 2024, the Bank's maximum borrowing capacity with the FHLB was $661.4 million and the remaining borrowing capacity was $648.6 million, with the difference being deposit letters of credit of $11.8 million and credit enhancement recourse obligations related to the master commitments through the FHLB's Mortgage Partnership Finance program of $1.0 million.

Additionally, as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Bank hadno short-term borrowings through its Federal Funds lines of credits with various other lending institutions, with an aggregate maximum borrowing capacity of $67.0 million.

Short-term borrowings

As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Bank hadno short-term borrowings with the FHLB, Federal Reserve Bank or other such lending institutions andno Fed Funds purchased outstanding.

Information related to short-term borrowings is summarized as follows:

Long-term borrowings

As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Bank hadno long-term borrowings with the FHLB or the Federal Reserve Bank.

Repurchase agreements

Along with traditional deposits, the Bank has access to securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”) with clients representing funds deposited, on an overnight basis, that are collateralized by investment securities owned by us. All repurchase agreements are subject to terms and conditions of repurchase/security agreements between us and the client and are accounted for as secured borrowings. Our repurchase agreements reflected in liabilities consist of client accounts and securities which are pledged on an individual security basis.

We monitor the fair value of the underlying securities on a monthly basis. Repurchase agreements are reflected in the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. The primary risk with our repurchase agreements is the market risk associated with the investments securing the transactions, as we may be required to provide additional collateral based on fair value changes of the underlying investments. Securities pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements are maintained with our safekeeping agents.

At December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, all of our repurchase agreements were overnight agreements. These borrowings were collateralized with investment securities with a carrying value of $2.8 million and $4.9 million at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively, and were comprised of United States government agency securities and United States sponsored mortgage-backed securities. Declines in the value of the collateral would require us to increase the amounts of securities pledged.

Information related to repurchase agreements is summarized as follows:

Subordinated debt

Information related to subordinated debt is summarized as follows:

In September 2021, we completed the private placement of $30 million fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes to certain qualified institutional investors. These notes are unsecured and have a 10-year term, maturing October 1, 2031, and will bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.25%, payable semi-annually in arrears, for the first five years of the term. Thereafter, the interest rate will reset quarterly to an interest rate per annum equal to a benchmark rate, which is Three-Month Term SOFR, plus 254 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears. These notes have been structured to qualify as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes.

In November 2020, we completed the private placement of $40 million fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes to certain qualified institutional investors. These notes are unsecured and have aten-year term, maturing December 1, 2030, and will bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.25%, payable semi-annually in arrears, for the first five years of the term. Thereafter, the interest rate will reset quarterly to an interest rate per annum equal to a benchmark rate, which is Three-Month Term SOFR, plus 401 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears. These notes have been structured to qualify as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes.

In March 2007, we completed the private placement of $4.0 million Floating Rate, Trust Preferred Securities through our MVB Financial Statutory Trust I subsidiary (the “Trust”). We established the Trust for the sole purpose of issuing the Trust Preferred Securities pursuant to an Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust. The Trust Preferred Securities and the Debentures mature in 2037 and have been redeemable by us since 2012. Interest payments are due in March, June, September and December and are adjusted at the interest due dates at a rate of 0.26%, plus Three-Month Term SOFR. The obligations we provide with respect to the issuance of the trust preferred securities constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by us of the Trust’s obligations with respect to the trust preferred securities to the extent set forth in the related guarantees. The securities issued by the Trust are includable for regulatory purposes as a component of our Tier 1 capital.

We recognized interest expense on our subordinated debt of $3.2 million, $3.2 million and $3.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Senior term loan

Information related to senior term loan is summarized as follows:

In October 2022, we entered into a credit agreement with Raymond James Bank ("Raymond James"). Pursuant to the credit agreement, Raymond James has extended to us a senior term loan in the aggregate principal amount of up to $10 million. In connection with the closing of the Warp Speed transaction, we borrowed $10 million and paid Raymond James an upfront fee of 1% of the loan amount. The loan will bear interest per annum at a rate equal to 2.75%, plus term SOFR, which will reset monthly. Accrued interest is payable on the last business day of each month, beginning with October 31, 2022, with the then outstanding principal balance of the loan payable on the last business day of each quarter in the amount of $125,000 during the first year and $250,000 thereafter. In May 2024, the senior term loan was repaid.

We recognized interest expense on our senior term loan of $0.3 million, $0.8 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Note 8 – Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Commitments

We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the statements of financial condition.

Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.

Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount and type of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us upon extension of credit, varies and is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third-party. Standby letters of credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Our policy for obtaining collateral, and the nature of such collateral, is substantially the same as that involved in making commitments to extend credit.

Specifically, the Bank has entered into agreements to extend credit or provide conditional payments pursuant to standby and commercial letters of credit. In addition, the Bank utilizes letters of credit issued by the FHLB to collateralize certain public funds deposits.

To estimate the liability for off-balance sheet credit exposures, Bank management analyzed the portfolios of unfunded commitments based on the same segmentation used for our ACL calculation. The estimated funding rate for each segment was derived from a funding rate study created by a third-party vendor which analyzed funding of various loan types over time to develop industry benchmarks at the call report code level. Once the estimated future advances were calculated, the allocation rate applicable to that portfolio segment was applied in the same manner as those used for our ACL calculation. The resulting estimated loss allocations were totaled to determine the liability for unfunded commitments related to these loans, which management considers necessary to anticipate potential losses on those commitments that have a reasonable probability of funding. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the liability for unfunded commitments related to loans held for investment was $1.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

Total contractual amounts of the commitments as of December 31, were as follows:

Concentration of Credit Risk

We grant a majority of our commercial, financial, agricultural, real estate and installment loans to customers throughout the North Central West Virginia and Northern Virginia markets. Collateral for loans is primarily commercial and residential real estate, personal property and business equipment. We evaluate the credit worthiness of each of our customers on a case-by-case basis and the amount of collateral we obtain is based upon management’s credit evaluation.

Contingent Liabilities

The Bank is involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management and counsel, the outcome of these matters would not have a significant adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Note 9 – Income Taxes

The provisions for income taxes for the years ended December 31, were as follows:

Following is a reconciliation of income taxes at federal statutory rates to recorded income taxes for the year ended December 31:

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities were comprised of the following at December 31:

Net deferred income tax assets are included in accrued interest and other assets. We have no unrecognized tax benefits, nor pending examination issues related to tax positions taken in preparation of our income tax returns. With limited exceptions, the we are no longer subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for years prior to 2021.

Note 10 – Related Party Transactions

We have granted loans to our officers and directors and to their immediate family members, as well as loans to related companies. These related party loans are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated parties and do not involve more than normal risk of collectability. Set forth below is a summary of the related loan activity.

We held related party deposits of $303.3 million and $256.0 million at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.

In January 2022, the MVB Bank Inc. Board of Directors approved a $35.0 million line of credit to BillGO, Inc. a related party of the Bank. As of December 31, 2023 the line of credit to BillGO, Inc. has been closed. Interest income on the line of credit totaled $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. There wasno interest income on the line of credit for the year ended December 31, 2024. Issuing sponsorship income generated during the year from contracts with BillGO, Inc. totaled $0.4 million and $0.3 million for December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.

In October 2022, we acquired an interest in Warp Speed and account for our ownership as an equity method investment, initially recorded at cost including costs incurred to obtain the equity method investment. As part of the purchase, we are able to designatetwo out ofseven directors to the board of directors of Warp Speed. We purchase loan participations from CalCon Mutual Mortgage LLC ("CalCon"), a subsidiary of Warp Speed. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, loans purchased from CalCon had an outstanding balance of $51.2 million and $46.0 million. Interest income recognized on these participations was $3.0 million and $2.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.

We account for our ownership interests in ICM as an equity method investment and purchase loan participations from ICM. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, loans purchased from ICM had an outstanding balance of $540.9 million and $564.8 million. In December 2022, we completed the placement of $5.0 million subordinated note to ICM. In December 2023, the subordinated note was amended and restated to extend the maturity date until December 2024. In October 2024, principal and interest was paid in the amount of $2.8 million and the maturity date was extended a second time to January 2026, with total of $3.0 million remaining. Further, in October 2022, we completed the placement of $1.4 million subordinated note to ICM with an interest rate of 8% per annum, compounded annually. The principal and interest of this note will be paid in one sum balloon payment no later than January 2026. As of July 2020,100 preferred units are issued and outstanding from ICM. The preferred units are valued at $7.5 million and will receive priority distribution equal to an annual rate of 5.5%.

Note 11 – Pension Plan

We participate in a trusteed pension plan known as the Allegheny Group Retirement Plan. Benefits are based on years of service and the employee’s compensation. Accruals under the plan were frozen as of May 31, 2014. Freezing the plan resulted in a remeasurement of the pension obligations and plan assets as of the freeze date. The pension obligation was remeasured using the discount rate based on the Citigroup Above Median Pension Discount Curve in effect on May 31, 2014 of 4.5%.

In June 2017, we approved a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”), pursuant to which the Chief Executive Officer of Potomac Mortgage Group ("PMG") is entitled to receive certain supplemental nonqualified retirement benefits. The SERP took effect on December 31, 2017. As the executive completed three years of continuous employment with PMG prior to retirement date (which shall be no earlier than the date he attains age 55) he will, upon retirement, be entitled to receive $1.8 million payable in 180 consecutive equal monthly installments. The liability is calculated by discounting the anticipated future cash flows at 4.0%. The liability accrued for this obligation was $1.7 million and $1.4 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Service costs were not material for any periods covered by this report. In February 2024, the SERP was terminated. Within the agreement, there is aone year provision for payment delay. As such, the $1.8 million obligation is scheduled to be paid in April 2025. Net periodic pension income and expense was not significant for 2024, 2023 or 2022.

Information pertaining to the activity in our defined benefit plan, using the latest available actuarial valuations with a measurement date of December 31, 2024 and 2023 is as follows:

At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation are as follows:

The components of net periodic pension cost (income) are as follows:

For the years December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost (income) are as follows:

Our pension plan asset allocations at December 31, 2024 and 2023 are as follows:

The following table sets forth the fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy, as defined in Note 18 – Fair Value Measurements, of the pension plan’s assets as of December 31, 2024:

1 Investments reported at net asset value include real estate investment trusts.

The following table sets forth the pension plan’s assets by fair value hierarchy level, as defined in Note 18 – Fair Value Measurements, at fair value as of December 31, 2023:

1 Investments reported at net asset value include real estate investment trusts.

Investment in government securities, short-term investments, domestic equities and foreign equities are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded. Alternative investments are valued at quoted prices, which are available but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed. Real estate investment trusts are valued at the net asset value of the trust at the reporting date. The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while this plan believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

The following table includes our best estimate of the plan contribution for next fiscal year and the benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five fiscal years and in the aggregate for the five fiscal years thereafter:

Note 12 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The table below summarizes the changes in carrying amounts of goodwill and other intangibles, including core deposit intangibles, for the periods presented:

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired net assets under the acquisition method of accounting. Intangibles resulting represent customer relationships and trade name related to prior acquisitions. These items are amortized over four years and 10 years, respectively.

The table below presents estimated amortization expense for our other intangible assets (dollars in thousands):

Goodwill and intangibles are evaluated for impairment if events and circumstances indicate a potential for impairment. No impairment charges were recorded for other intangible assets in any of the periods presented.

Note 13 – Stock-Based Compensation

The MVB Financial Corp. Incentive Stock Plan (the “Plan”) provides for the issuance of stock options, restricted stock awards and RSUs to selected employees and directors. On April 4, 2022, the Board of Directors adopted the MVB Financial Corp 2022 Incentive Plan (the “2022 Plan”), which was approved by the shareholders at the annual meeting dated, May 17, 2022. The 2022 Plan replaces the MVB Financial Corp. 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) and provides for 975,000 shares authorized for grant which includes the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2013 Plan that remained available for grant thereunder as of the date of Board approval of the 2022 Plan. As of December 31, 2024, 385,697 shares remain available for issuance.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Stock-based compensation expense is recognized as salary and employee benefit cost based upon the fair value of the instruments on the date of the grant. The amount that we recognized in stock-based compensation expense related to the issuance of stock options and RSUs is presented in the following table:

Proceeds from stock options exercised were $1.5 million, $0.6 million and $2.1 million during 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. During 2024, 2023 and 2022, certain options were exercised in broker-assisted cashless transactions. Shares were forfeited related to exercise price and related tax obligations, and we paid tax authorities amounts due resulting in a net cash outflow.

Stock Options

Under the provisions of the Plan, the option price per share shall not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. Generally, options granted vest inthree tofive years and expireten years from the grant date.

The following summarizes stock options as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024:

The intrinsic value of options exercised during 2024, 2023 and 2022 was $0.7 million, $0.6 million and $3.5 million, respectively.

The fair value for the options was estimated at the grant date using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following inputs:

The following summarizes information related to the total outstanding and exercisable stock options at December 31, 2024:

At December 31, 2024, total unrecognized pre-tax compensation expense related to unvested stock options outstanding was $0.5 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the fair value of stock options vested was $0.3 million.

Restricted Stock Units

Under the provisions of the Plan, RSUs are similar to restricted stock awards, except the recipient does not receive the stock immediately, but instead receives the stock according to a vesting plan and distribution schedule, after achieving required performance milestones or upon remaining with us for a particular length of time. Each RSU that vests entitles the recipient to receive one share of our common stock on a specified issuance date. The recipient does not have any stockholder rights, including voting, dividend or liquidation rights, with respect to the shares underlying awarded RSUs until the recipient becomes the record holder of those shares.

We granted 207,012 RSUs in 2024,130,114 of which were time-based awards and 76,898 of which were performance-based awards. Time-based RSUs granted in 2024 generally vest inthree equal installments over athree-year period, with the exception of time-based grants to members of the Board of Directors, which vest over aone-year period. Performance-based RSUs vest in one installment at the end ofthree years, based on set criteria.

A summary of the activity for our RSUs for the period indicated is presented in the following table:

At December 31, 2024, based on RSU awards outstanding at that time, the total unrecognized pre-tax compensation expense related to unvested RSU awards was $3.6 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. At December 31, 2024, the fair value of RSU awards vested during the year was $2.1 million.

Subsidiary Equity Plan

In December 2021, Victor's Board of Directors approved the Victor Technologies, Inc. 2021 Incentive Plan (the “2021 Victor LTI Plan”) which is an incentive plan denominated in Victor’s common shares. The 2021 Victor LTI Plan provides for the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units to selected employees and directors. Effective November 2024, the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the plan was amended to 4.0 million shares from 3.0 million. As of December 31, 2024,738,798 shares remain available for issuance.

During 2024, Victor issued a total of 1,952,212 options to employees and non-employees at an average exercise price of $0.37 per share. The options have aten-year term and will vest over athree-year period, so long as the optionees remain employed by Victor.

A summary of the activity for Victor's RSUs for the period indicated is presented in the following table:

At December 31, 2024, the unrecognized compensation expense related to 2,152,571 nonvested stock options was not material.

Note 14 – Earnings Per Share

We determine basic earnings per share (“EPS”) by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is determined by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding, increased by both the number of shares that would be issued assuming the exercise of instruments under our incentive stock plan.

Note 15 – Regulatory Capital Requirements

We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our consolidated financial statements. The Bank is required to comply with applicable capital adequacy standards established by the federal banking agencies. West Virginia state chartered banks, such as the Bank, are subject to similar capital requirements adopted by the West Virginia Division of Financial Institutions.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of capital. The optional community bank leverage ratio ("CBLR") framework, which is issued through interagency guidance, intends to provide a simple alternative measure of capital adequacy for electing qualifying depository institutions as directed under the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act. Under the CBLR, if a qualifying depository institution elects to use such measure, such institutions will be considered well capitalized if its ratio of Tier 1 capital to average total consolidated assets (i.e., leverage ratio) exceeds a 9% threshold, subject to a limited two quarter grace period, during which the leverage ratio cannot go 100 basis points below the then applicable threshold, and will not be required to calculate and report risk-based capital ratios. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, we and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

The most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain the minimum CBLR as set forth in the table below. Our actual capital amounts and ratio is presented in the table below.

● Leverage ratio greater than 9%.

Note 16 – Regulatory Restriction on Dividends

Approval of the regulatory agencies is required if the total of all dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year exceeds the Bank’s net profits, as defined, for that year combined with its retained net profits for the precedingtwo calendar years.

Note 17 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying values and estimated fair values of financial instruments are summarized as follows:

Fair Value Measurements at:

Note 18 – Fair Value Measurements

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time of our entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of our financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, and therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments.

Assets Measured on a Recurring Basis

As required by accounting standards, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following measurements are made on a recurring basis.

Available-for-sale investment securities —Available-for-sale investment securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level I securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange and money market funds. Level II securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities and private label entities, municipal bonds,

United States Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in inactive over-the-counter markets and corporate debt securities. Certain local municipal securities related to tax increment financing (“TIF”) are independently valued and classified as Level III instruments.

Equity securities —Certain equity securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security's credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. The valuation methodologies utilized may include significant unobservable inputs.

Loans held-for-sale — The fair value of loans held-for-sale is determined, when possible, using quoted secondary market prices or investor commitments. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan, which would be used by other market participants. If the fair value at the reporting date exceeds the amortized cost of a loan, the loan is reported at amortized cost.

Interest rate swaps– Interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value based on third-party vendors who compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar instruments by using pricing models that consider observable market data.

Fair value hedges –Treated like an interest rate swap, fair value hedges are recorded at fair value based on third-party vendors who compile prices from various sources and may determine fair value of identical or similar instruments by using pricing models that consider observable market data.

Embedded derivatives — Accounted for and recorded separately from the underlying contract as a derivative at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair values are determined using the Monte Carlo model valuation technique. The valuation methodology utilized includes significant unobservable inputs.

The following tables present the assets reported on the consolidated statements of financial condition at their fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 by level within the fair value hierarchy:

The following table represents recurring Level III assets as of the periods shown:

Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis

We may be required, from time to time, to measure certain financial and non-financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market value that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. Certain non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include foreclosed assets (upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment), non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a goodwill impairment test and intangible assets and other non-financial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment.

Collateral-dependent loans– Certain loans receivable are evaluated individually for credit loss when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of collateral. Estimated credit losses are based on the fair value of the collateral, adjusted for costs to sell. Collateral values are estimated using Level II inputs based on observable market data or Level III inputs based on customized discounting criteria. For a majority of collateral-dependent real estate related loans, we obtain a current external appraisal. Other valuation techniques are used as well, including internal valuations, comparable property analysis and contractual sales information.

Other real estate owned– Other real estate owned, which is obtained through the Bank’s foreclosure process, is valued utilizing the appraised collateral value. Collateral values are estimated using Level II inputs based on observable market data or Level III inputs based on customized discounting criteria. At the time the foreclosure is completed, we obtain a current external appraisal. Upon acquisition, the foreclosed assets are measured at fair market value. Subsequent to their initial recognition, the foreclosed assets are remeasured at fair value through a write-down included in other noninterest expense.

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 are included in the table below:

The carrying amount of equity securities without a readily determinable fair value and amounts of unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 are included in the table below:

At December 31, 2024 equity securities consist of our Fintech investment portfolio, which is comprised of investments innine companies with a carrying value of $36.5 million, and other equity security investments with a carrying value of $1.1 million. The equity securities included in the table above do not have readily determinable fair values and are recorded at cost and adjusted for observable price changes for underlying transactions for identical or similar investments. The net gain or loss in values of the equity securities is included in holding gain (loss) on equity securities in our consolidated statements of income.

The following tables presents quantitative information about the Level III significant unobservable inputs for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2024 and 2023:

1 Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various Level III inputs which are not identifiable.

2 Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted-average of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percent of the appraisal.

3 Municipal securities classified as Level III instruments are comprised of TIF bonds related to certain local municipal securities.

4 Fair value determined through independent analysis of liquidity, rating, yield and duration.

5 Appraisals may be adjusted for qualitative factors, such as local economic conditions, liquidity, marketability and legal structure.

Note 19 – Derivatives

We use certain derivative instruments to meet the needs of customers, as well as to manage the interest rate risk associated with certain transactions. All derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities and measured at fair value.

Fair Value Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to changes in the fair value of fixed rate mortgages and certain fixed rate available for sale securities included in a closed portfolio due to changes in benchmark interest rates.

In 2023, we entered into five fixed portfolio layer method fair value swaps, designated as hedging instruments under the portfolio layer method, to manage exposure to changes in fair value on fixed rate mortgages and certain fixed rate available for sale securities attributable to the designated interest rate. Four of the interest rate swaps were designated to hedge a closed portfolio of fixed rate mortgages, andone of the interest rate swaps was designated to hedge a closed portfolio of fixed rate municipal bonds. The interest rate swaps involve the payment of fixed-rate amounts to a counterparty in exchange for us receiving variable-rate payments over the life of the agreements, without the exchange of the underlying notional amount.

In October 2024, we discontinued a portfolio layer method fair value swap designated as a hedging instrument to hedge a closed portfolio of fixed rate mortgages. The hedge, which had a notional amount of $250.0 million, was fully dedesignated, and we paid the counterparty $2.1 million to terminate the swap. We recorded a $0.5 million loss in 2023 and $1.7 million remained on the balance sheet as a basis adjustment to the loans that were part of the hedged portfolio. The $1.7 million basis adjustment will be amortized over the life of the underlying hedged items. As of December 31, 2024, the basis adjustment remaining on the hedged portfolio was $1.6 million.

The total notional amount of thefour remaining active swaps was $176.0 million at December 31, 2024, one of which is amortizing and included a $24.0 million amortization adjustment to the notional amount at December 31, 2024. Under the portfolio layer method, the hedged items are designated as a hedged layer of closed portfolios of financial loans and municipal bonds that are anticipated to remain outstanding for the designated hedged periods. Adjustments are made to record the swaps at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets, with changes in fair value recognized in interest income. The carrying values of the fair value swaps on the consolidated balance sheets are also adjusted through interest income, based on changes in fair value attributable to changes in the hedged risk.

The following table, which includes active fair value hedged items and discontinued fair value hedged items on which a basis adjustment still remains, represents the carrying value of the portfolio layer method hedged assets and the cumulative fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying value of the hedged assets as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023:

In January 2025, we discontinuedtwo portfolio layer method fair value swaps designated as hedging instruments. One of the swaps, which was designated to hedge a closed portfolio of fixed rate mortgages, was in a liability position with an immaterial fair value and had a notional amount of $30.0 million as of December 31, 2024. The other swap, which was designated to hedge a closed portfolio of fixed rate municipal bonds, was in a liability position with a fair value of $0.6 million and had a notional amount of $50.0 million as of December 31, 2024. As part of the discontinuance, we incurred $0.5 million in fees that will be amortized over the life of the related loans and securities.

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Matched Interest Rate Swaps. We enter into interest rate swap contracts to help commercial loan borrowers manage their interest rate risk. The interest rate swap contracts with commercial loan borrowers allow them to convert floating-rate loan payments to fixed rate loan payments. When we enter into an interest rate swap contract with a commercial loan borrower, we simultaneously enter into a "mirror" swap contract with a third-party. The third-party exchanges the borrower's fixed-rate loan payments for floating-rate loan payments. These derivatives are not designated as hedges and changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. Because these derivatives have mirror-image contractual terms, the changes in fair value substantially offset each other through earnings. Fees earned in connection with the execution of derivatives related to this program are recognized in earnings through loan-related derivative income.

The following tables summarize outstanding financial derivative instruments as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023:

Embedded Derivative

In December 2022, we entered into an agreement to sell a portion of our shares of Interchecks Technologies, Inc., a former equity method investment that was subsequently reclassified to equity securities due to the decrease in the remaining ownership percentage. Based on the terms of the sale, we recognized the cash received at closing, as well as a receivable for the remaining installment payment, which is based on a future economic event and is accounted for and separately recorded as a derivative. The derivative instrument is included in accrued interest receivable and other assets on the consolidated balance sheet, while the gains and losses are included innoninterest income on the consolidated statement of income. The fair value of the embedded derivative was $0.6 million at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, with no gain or loss for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and a loss of $0.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023.

Note 20 – Comprehensive Income

The following tables present the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) for the years ended December 31:

Note 21 – Condensed Financial Statements of Parent Company

Information relative to the parent company’s condensed balance sheets at December 31, 2024 and 2023 and the related condensed statements of income and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 are presented below:

Condensed Balance Sheets

Condensed Statements of Income

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

Note 22 – Segment Reporting

We have identified three reportable segments: CoRe Banking, Mortgage Banking and Financial Holding Company. All other operating segments are summarized in an Other category. We determined these segments based on differences in products and services.

Our CoRe Banking segment, which includes our Fintech division, represents banking products and services offered to customers by the Bank, primarily loans and deposits accounts. Revenue from banking activities consists primarily of interest earned on loans and investment securities and service charges on deposit accounts.

Revenue from our Mortgage Banking segment is primarily comprised of our share of net income or loss from mortgage banking activities of our equity method investments in ICM and Warp Speed.

Revenue from Financial Holding Company activities is mainly comprised of intercompany service income and dividends.

The Other category consists of professional service and our Edge Venture companies. Revenue from the professional services are primarily made up of professional consulting income derived from banks and Fintech companies. Revenue from our Edge Ventures companies primarily consist of software services, offering account functionality and transactions to customers through web-based platforms.

Our chief operating decision makers ("CODMs") regularly review the performance of operating segments to assess performance and allocate resources between segments as necessary. The CODMs consist of the Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer. The measure used by the CODMs to assess performance and decide how to allocate resources is based on net income that also is reported on the income statement as consolidated net income. Net income is used by the CODMs to monitor budget versus actual results, as well as benchmarking to our peers. Net income on a segment basis is reported below.

Information about the reportable segments and reconciliation to the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 are as follows:

Note 23 – Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Note 24 – Acquisitions and Divestitures

Chartwell Compliance

In February 2023, we completed the sale of the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Chartwell, for total consideration of $14.4 million in the form of a note issued to the buyer, resulting in a gain on sale of $11.8 million. The note matures June 20, 2027 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 7%, payable infour equal annual installments commencing June 20, 2024. To facilitate a transition of the Chartwell services and support the onboarding and conversion of systems, we entered into a 60-day Employee Lease and Service Agreement, whereby we provided the purchaser with finance and accounting, human capital, information technology, marketing and record/data retention services. In addition, we entered into a contract with the purchaser to continue to receive services and support from Chartwell forthree years following the sale. We paid $3.9 million and $2.5 million in fees related to this contract during the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.

Chartwell's net income, including the $11.8 million gain, is presented in income from discontinued operations for all periods shown. Prior period balances have been reclassified to conform with this presentation. Chartwell's depreciation and amortization expense was $0.1 million and $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively.

The following table presents the major classes of net income from discontinued operations for the periods shown:

Flexia Payments, LLC

In May 2023, MVB Technology entered into an Assignment and Assumption Agreement with Flexia, wherein Flexia assigned loans outstanding between Flexia and MVB to MVB Technology. In consideration for the assignment, Flexia granted a license to MVB Technology for the Flexia software. Additionally, through a Mutual Release Agreement between Edge Ventures and Flexia, Edge Ventures transferred its 800 Class A Common Units and 1,500 Preferred Units of Flexia back to Flexia for cancellation. As a result of the transactions, we incurred a loss of $1.1 million and no longer consolidate Flexia in our financial statements.

Trabian Technology, Inc.

As of December 31, 2024, the Bank owned an 80.8% interest in Trabian and consolidated 100% of Trabian within the consolidated financial statements. In December 2024, the Board of Directors and Finance Committee approved a plan to sell the Bank's controlling interest in Trabian for $3.5 million. As such, Trabian's assets, including $1.6 million of goodwill, and liabilities were classified as held-for-sale on the consolidated balance sheet as December 31, 2024. In January 2025, we entered into a stock repurchase agreement with Trabian in which Trabian repurchased all the shares held by us. As a result of the transaction, we recognized again of $0.6 million and will no longer consolidate Trabian in our financial statements.

The following table presents the major classes of assets and liabilities held-for-sale as of December 31, 2024: