NELNET INC

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

Nelnet, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nelnet, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 27, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Assessment of the allowance for loan losses

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2023, was $104.6 million, of which $68.5 million related to the Company’s allowance for loan losses on federally insured loans and $15.8 million related to the Company’s allowance for loan losses on Non-Nelnet Bank private education loans, collectively, the allowance for loan losses (the ALL). The ALL is the measure of expected credit losses on a pooled basis for those loans that share similar risk characteristics based on a collective assessment using a combination of measurement models and management judgment. The Company estimated the ALL using an undiscounted cash flow model. The Company’s methodology is based on relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. For the undiscounted cash flow models, the expected credit losses are the product of multiplying the Company’s estimates of probability of default (PD), loss given default (LGD), and the exposure at default over the expected life of the loans. The undiscounted cash flow model incorporates probability weighted economic forecast scenarios and macroeconomic assumptions over the reasonable and supportable forecast periods. After the reasonable and supportable forecast periods, the Company reverts on a straight-line basis over the reversion period to its historical loss rates, evaluated

F - 2 over the historical observation period, for the remaining life of the loans. All such periods are established for each portfolio segment. A portion of the ALL is comprised of qualitative adjustments to historical loss experience.

We identified the assessment of the ALL as a critical audit matter. A high degree of audit effort, including specialized skills and knowledge, and subjective and complex auditor judgment was involved in the assessment due to significant measurement uncertainty. Specifically, the assessment encompassed the evaluation of the ALL methodology, including the methods, models, and significant assumptions used to estimate the PD and LGD. Such assumptions included the economic forecast scenario and macroeconomic assumptions, the reasonable and supportable forecast periods, and the historical observation period. The assessment also included an evaluation of the conceptual soundness and performance of the PD and LGD models. In addition, auditor judgment was required to evaluate the sufficiency of audit evidence obtained.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the Company’s measurement of the ALL estimate, including controls over the:

•development of the ALL methodology

•continued use and appropriateness of changes made to PD and LGD models

•identification and determination of the significant assumptions used in the PD and LGD models

•performance monitoring of the PD and LGD models

•analysis of the ALL results, trends, and ratios.

We evaluated the Company’s process to develop the ALL estimate by testing certain sources of data, factors, and assumptions that the Company used, and considered the relevance and reliability of such data, factors, and assumptions. In addition, we involved credit risk professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

•evaluating the Company’s ALL methodology for compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

•evaluating judgments made by the Company relative to the assessment and performance testing of the PD and LGD models by comparing them to relevant Company-specific metrics and trends and the applicable industry practices

•assessing the conceptual soundness and performance testing of the PD and LGD models by inspecting the model documentation to determine whether the models are suitable for their intended use

•evaluating the selection of the economic forecast scenarios and underlying assumptions by comparing it to the Company’s business environment and relevant industry practices

•evaluating the historical observation period and reasonable and supportable forecast periods by comparing to specific portfolio risk characteristics and trends

We also assessed the cumulative results of the procedures performed to assess the sufficiency of the audit evidence obtained related to the ALL estimate by evaluating the:

•cumulative results of the audit procedures

•qualitative aspects of the Company’s accounting practices

•potential bias in the accounting estimates.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1998.

Lincoln, Nebraska

February 27, 2024

F - 3