Good Times Restaurants Inc.

There may be various claims in process, matters in litigation, and other contingencies brought against the Company by employees, vendors, customers, franchisees, or other parties. Evaluating these contingencies is a complex process that may involve substantial judgment on the potential outcome of such matters, and the ultimate outcome of such contingencies may differ from our current analysis. We regularly review the adequacy of accruals and disclosures related to such contingent liabilities in consultation with legal counsel. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of these claims with certainty, it is management’s opinion that any reasonably possible losses associated with such contingencies have been adequately accrued or would be immaterial to our financial statements.

The Company was the defendant in a lawsuit styled as White Winston Select Asset Funds, LLC and GT Acquisition Group, Inc. v. Good Times Restaurants, Inc., arising from the failed negotiations between plaintiffs and the Company for the sale of the Good Times Drive Thru subsidiary to plaintiffs. The lawsuit was initially filed on September 24, 2019, in Delaware Chancery Court, and the Company removed the case to federal court in the US District Court for the District of Delaware on November 5, 2019. On July 30, 2021, the plaintiffs moved the Court for leave to amend their complaint and add new causes of action and a claim for $18 million in damages. On January 25, 2023, the Court rendered judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims in their entirety and denying all of the requested relief.

The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal of the Court’s January 25, 2023, decisions. Good Times, in turn, filed a notice of appeal of the Court’s previous dismissal of its counterclaim against the plaintiffs. On March 1, 2024, the court of appeals issued a ruling affirming the trial court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ claims and reversed the trial court’s previous dismissal of Good Times’ own claim for the plaintiffs’ breach of their covenant not to sue Good Times. The court of appeals ordered that Good Times’ counterclaim be remanded to the trial court for further consideration. Due to this favorable decision, during the quarter ended March 26, 2024, we reversed our previous contingency reserve of $332,000. The plaintiffs petitioned the court of appeals for rehearing on its reversal of the trial court’s dismissal of Good Times’ counterclaim. On June 20, 2024, the court of appeals affirmed its previous reversal of the trial court’s dismissal of Good Times’ counterclaim. The trial court considered the issue of White Winston’s liability to Good Times and Good Times’ claimed damages which exceeded $3 million and consisted largely of Good Times’ legal fees. The trial court ordered the parties to submit briefing on the issue of damages. On April 11, 2025, the Court-appointed special master issued a recommendation that Good Times recover damages in the amount of $3.826 million plus pre- and post-judgment interest. White Winston filed a written objection to the Special Master’s recommendation, and Good Times filed a written response. On July 30, 2025, the Court entered a final judgment in Good Times’ favor in the amount of $3,826,715.07 in damages, $813,845.34 in pre-judgment interest, and post-judgment interest at a rate of 9.5% per annum. On December 31, 2025, the parties entered into a settlement of the claims against White Winston for an amount significantly less than this judgment, concluding the litigation.