Zone Frontier Inc.

An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully read and consider all of the risks described below, together with all of the other information contained or referred to in this report, before making an investment decision with respect to our securities. If any of the following events occur, our financial condition, business and results of operations (including cash flows) may be materially adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We are an early-stage company with a limited operating history.

We are an early, startup stage company with a limited history upon which you can evaluate our business and prospects. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks encountered by companies in the early stages of development in highly competitive markets. You should consider the frequency with which early-stage businesses encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other adverse factors. These risks are described in more detail below.

We have incurred losses since our inception, and we may not be able to manage our business on a profitable basis.

We have generated losses since inception and have relied on cash on-hand, sales of securities, proceeds from our initial public offering, external bank lines of credit, and issuance of third-party and related party debt to support our operations. For the year ended June 30, 2026, we generated an operating loss of $57,978,720 and a net loss of $174,160,864. The revenue and income potential of our business and market are unproven. This makes an evaluation of our company and its prospects difficult and highly speculative. There can be no assurances that we will be able to construct our data centers on a timely and cost effective basis, that we will be able to generate any increase in revenues, that we will have adequate financing or resources to continue operating our business and to provide services to customers, that we will earn a profit, that we can raise sufficient capital to support operations by attaining profitability, or that we can satisfy future liabilities.

Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion on our audited consolidated financial statements.

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm that accompanies our consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2026 contains a going concern qualification in which such firm expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, based on the financial statements at that time. We have generated losses since inception and have relied on cash on-hand, sales of securities, proceeds from our initial public offering, external bank lines of credit, and issuance of third-party and related party debt to support cashflow from operations. As of June 30, 2026, we had cash of $15,435,213, a net loss of $174,160,864, working capital of $17,828,233, and cash used in operating activities of $18,157,390. Management believes that currently available resources may not be sufficient to fund our planned expenditures over the next 12 months. These factors, individually and collectively, indicate that a material uncertainty exists that raises substantial doubt about our company’s ability to continue as a going concern for 12 months from the balance sheet date as of June 30, 2026.

We will be dependent upon the raising of additional capital through equity and/or debt financing in order to implement our business plan and generate sufficient revenue in excess of costs. If we raise additional capital through the issuance of equity securities or securities convertible into equity, stockholders will experience dilution, and such securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of common stock. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt, we may be subject to limitations on its operations, through debt covenants or other restrictions. There is no assurance that we will be successful with future financing ventures, and the inability to secure such financing may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis under which our company is expected to be able to realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities in the normal course of business and do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. If we cannot continue as a going concern, our stockholders would likely lose most or all of their investment our company.

We will require additional financing to accomplish our business strategy.

We require substantial capital to fund our business development plans. We anticipate the possibility of having to raise additional funds in order to achieve our plans and accomplish our longer-term business strategy. These additional funds likely will be raised through the issuance of our securities in debt and/or equity financings. If we are unable to raise these additional funds on terms acceptable to us, we will be required to limit our expenditures for continuing our product development activities, or find alternatives to fund our business on terms that are not as favorable to us. Any such actions would impair our product development and expansion plans, reduce potential revenues, and adversely affect the value of our company.

We cannot accurately predict future revenues or profitability in the emerging market for aqueous ozone technology.

The market for alternative green cleaning supplies is rapidly evolving. As is typical of a rapidly evolving industry, demand, and market acceptance for recently introduced products are subject to a high level of uncertainty. Moreover, since the market for our products is evolving, it is difficult to predict the future growth rate, if any, and size of this market. Because of our limited operating history and the emerging nature of the markets in which we compete, we are unable to accurately forecast our revenues or our profitability. The market for our products and the long-term acceptance of our products are uncertain, and our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel with industry expertise, particularly sales and marketing personnel, is uncertain. To the extent we are unsuccessful in increasing revenues, we may be required to appropriately adjust spending to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall, or to reduce our operating expenses, causing us to forego potential revenue generating activities, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The planned growth of our commercial operations may place a significant strain on our management and on our operational and financial resources and systems. To manage growth effectively, we will need to maintain a system of management controls, and attract and retain qualified personnel, as well as develop, train and manage management-level and other employees. Failure to manage our growth effectively could cause us to over-invest or under-invest in infrastructure, and result in losses or weaknesses in our infrastructure, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow. Any failure by us to manage our growth effectively could have a negative effect on our ability to achieve our development and commercialization goals and strategies.

We operate in new and rapidly changing markets, which makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and may increase the risk that we will not be successful.

The market for data centers is a rapidly changing market, characterized by changing technologies, high capital needs, the introduction of new competitors, evolving industry standards, and changing and diverse regulatory environments. Our inability to anticipate these changes and adapt our business and offerings could undermine our business strategy and impact our expected revenue growth and profitability over the next several years.

We expect one major customer to account for all our revenue and the loss of that customer could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

For the year ended June 30, 2026, two customers accounted for 27% and 16%of revenue, and two customers that accounted for 18% and 16% of all accounts receivable at June 30, 2026. For the year ended June 30, 2025, two customers accounted for 42% and 17%of revenue, and one customer accounted for 47% of all accounts receivable at June 30, 2025.

For the AI Critical Infrastructure segment, our flagship Minnesota data center has already been fully leased out to one customer on a ten-year term, with two ten-year renewal period options. Our results of operations and ability to service our debt obligations would also be impacted negatively to the extent that this customer is unable to make payments to us or does not make timely payments on outstanding accounts receivable.

We depend on a limited number of third parties to supply key equipment, raw materials, and labor to us to build our data centers, and the failure to obtain a sufficient supply of these inputs in a timely fashion and at reasonable costs could significantly delay our delivery of services. These inputs could also increase in price, reducing the expected profitability.

Equipment used to build and operate data centers can be highly customized, expensive, require long lead times, and available from a small number of vendors, for which there can be high demand. Failure to secure critical equipment could result in delays or inability to generate revenue.

The United States has recently enacted and/or proposed to enact significant new tariffs on goods imported from numerous countries. Additionally, President Trump has directed various federal agencies to further evaluate key aspects of U.S. trade policy and there has been ongoing discussion and commentary regarding potential significant changes to U.S. trade policies, treaties and tariffs. There continues to exist significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the U.S. and other countries with respect to such trade policies, treaties and tariffs.

For the AI Critical Infrastructure business, all our suppliers are domestic and we are not aware of any material exposure to raw materials, components, or finished goods that could be subject to tariffs.

We are closely monitoring these developments and evaluating strategies to mitigate potential impacts.

Furthermore, as a result of policy changes and government proposals, there may be greater restrictions and economic disincentives on international trade in general. The new tariffs and other changes in U.S. trade policy have triggered retaliatory actions by affected countries, and foreign governments have instituted or are considering imposing trade sanctions on U.S. goods. Such changes have the potential to adversely impact the U.S. economy or sectors thereof, our industry and the demand for our products, and as a result, could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on utility inputs from a variety of sources to power our data centers. If our fulfillment operations are interrupted for any significant period or are not sufficient to accommodate our facilities, our sales could decline, and our reputation could be harmed.

Our data centers receive power from grid providers, renewable sources, and backup generators. If we do not successfully provide adequate power capabilities, our sales could decline. Our data centers also require significant water resources. If we are not able to source adequate water for use in our data centers, that could impact compute capacity and our sales could decline.

In addition, our data centers and computer systems are susceptible to damage or interruption from weather, human error, pandemics, fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failures, hackings, terrorist attacks, acts of war, break-ins, earthquakes and similar events. We maintain back-up power systems but they may not be sufficient, depending on the duration of interruption. We do not presently have a formal disaster recovery plan and our business interruption insurance may be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur in the event operations at our data centers are interrupted. In addition, alternative arrangements may not be available, or if they are available, may increase the cost of fulfillment. Any interruptions in our operations for any significant period of time, including interruptions resulting from the expansion of our existing facilities or the transfer of operations to a new facility, could damage our reputation and brand and substantially harm our business and results of operations.

Security threats, such as ransomware attacks, to our IT infrastructure could expose us to liability, and damage our reputation and business.

It is essential to our business strategy that our technology and network infrastructure remain secure and is perceived by our customers to be secure. Despite security measures, however, any network infrastructure may be vulnerable to cyber-attacks. Information security risks have significantly increased in recent years in part due to the proliferation of new technologies and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists and other external parties, including foreign private parties and state actors. We may face cyber-attacks that attempt to penetrate our network security, including our data centers, to sabotage or otherwise disable our website, misappropriate our or our customers’ proprietary information, which may include personally identifiable information, or cause interruptions of our internal systems and services. If successful, any of these attacks could negatively affect our reputation, damage our network infrastructure and our ability to sell our services, harm our relationship with customers that are affected and expose us to financial liability.

We maintain a comprehensive system of preventive and detective controls through our security programs; however, given the rapidly evolving nature and proliferation of cyber threats, our controls may not prevent or identify all such attacks in a timely manner or otherwise prevent unauthorized access to, damage to, or interruption of our systems and operations, and we cannot eliminate the risk of human error or employee or vendor malfeasance.

In addition, any failure by us to comply with applicable privacy and information security laws and regulations could cause us to incur significant costs to protect any customers whose personal data was compromised and to restore customer confidence in us and to make changes to our information systems and administrative processes to address security issues and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in our ability to protect their personal information, which could cause them to stop shopping on our sites altogether. Such events could lead to lost sales and adversely affect our results of operations. We also could be exposed to government enforcement actions and private litigation.

We face significant competition.

We believe that our success will depend heavily upon attracting and retaining tenants. Current and new competitors, however, may be able to develop and introduce better or more desirable facilities in advance of us or at a lower cost. In addition, some of our current and potential competitors have longer and/or more established operating histories, greater industry experience, greater name recognition, established customer bases, and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and other resources than we do. To be competitive, we must respond promptly and effectively to the challenges of technological change, evolving standards and regulations, and our competitors’ innovations. Increased competition could result in a decrease in the desirability of our services, a decrease in the use of our services by customers, loss of market share and brand recognition, and a reduction in the projected revenues from our services. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors. Competitive pressures faced by us could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We could be subject to litigation, including for businesses the Company no longer operates.

The Cleaning business is being marketed for sale as of September 28, 2026 and the Treasury business was exited on July 20, 2026 but the Company could still be liable for claims made related to these strategies.

Product liability claims are common. Even though we have not been subject to such claims in the past, we could be a named defendant in a lawsuit alleging product liability claims including, but not limited to, defects in the design, manufacture or labeling of our aqueous ozone products and machines.

Any litigation, regardless of its merit or eventual outcome, could result in significant legal costs and high damage awards or settlements. Although we currently maintain insurance, the coverage is subject to deductibles and limitations, and may not be adequate to cover future claims. Additionally, we may be unable to maintain our existing liability insurance in the future at satisfactory rates or at adequate amounts.

Our future success depends in large part upon the continued service of the members of our executive management team and key employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Tyler Hassen. All members of our executive management team are subject to employment agreements. In addition, our success also depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified technical, financial and accounting, legal and other managerial personnel. The competition for skilled personnel in the industries in which we operate is intense. Our personnel generally may terminate their employment at any time for any reason. We may incur significant costs to attract and retain highly skilled personnel, and we may lose new employees to our competitors before we realize the benefit of our investment in recruiting them. If we fail to attract new personnel or if we suffer increases in costs or business operations interruptions as a result of a labor dispute, or fail to retain and motivate our current personnel, we might not be able to operate our business effectively or efficiently, serve our users properly or maintain the quality of our content and services.

Failure to comply with privacy laws and regulations and failure to adequately protect customer data could harm our business, damage our reputation and result in the loss of customers.

Federal and state regulations may govern the collection, use, sharing and security of data that we receive from our customers. In addition, we have and post on our website our own privacy policies and practices concerning the collection, use and disclosure of customer data. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with our posted privacy policies or with any data-related consent orders, U.S. Federal Trade Commission requirements or other federal, state or international privacy-related laws and regulations could result in proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or others, which could potentially harm our business. Further, failure or perceived failure to comply with our policies or applicable requirements related to the collection, use or security of personal information or other privacy-related matters could damage our reputation and result in a loss of customers. The regulatory framework for privacy issues is currently evolving and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future.

We will face growing regulatory and compliance requirements in a variety of areas, which can be costly and time consuming.

Our business is, and may in the future be, subject to a variety of laws and regulations, including working conditions, labor, immigration and employment laws, and health, safety and sanitation requirements. We are unable to predict the outcome or effects of any potential legislative or regulatory proposals on our business. Any changes to the legal and regulatory framework applicable to our business could have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations. Our failure to comply with applicable governmental laws and regulations, or to maintain necessary permits or licenses, could result in liability that could have a material negative effect on our business and results of operations.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to develop or maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results and prevent fraud. As a result, current and potential stockholders could lose confidence in our financial statements, which would harm the trading price of our common stock.

Companies that file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including us, are subject to the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or SOX 404. SOX 404 requires management to establish and maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting and annual reports on Form 10-K filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, to contain a report from management assessing the effectiveness of a company’s internal control over financial reporting. Separately, under SOX 404, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, public companies that are large accelerated filers or accelerated filers must include in their annual reports on Form 10-K an attestation report of their regular auditors attesting to and reporting on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting. Non-accelerated filers and smaller reporting companies, like us, are not required to include an attestation report of their auditors in annual reports.

A report of our management is included under Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures.” We are a smaller reporting company and, consequently, are not required to include an attestation report of our auditor in our annual report. However, if and when we become subject to the auditor attestation requirements under SOX 404, we can provide no assurance that we will receive a positive attestation from our independent auditors.

During its evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2026, management identified material weaknesses as described under Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures.” We are undertaking remedial measures, which measures will take time to implement and test, to address these material weaknesses. There can be no assurance that such measures will be sufficient to remedy the material weaknesses identified or that additional material weaknesses or other control or significant deficiencies will not be identified in the future. If we continue to experience material weaknesses in our internal controls or fail to maintain or implement required new or improved controls, such circumstances could cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements, or adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and, if required, annual auditor attestation reports. Each of the foregoing results could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and lead to a decline in our stock price.

Industry and other market data that may be used in our periodic reports that we may file with the SEC and our other materials, including those undertaken by us or our engaged consultants, may not prove to be representative of current and future market conditions or future results.

The periodic reports that we may file with the SEC may include or refer to statistical and other industry and market data that we obtained from industry publications and research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties and surveys and studies that we may have undertaken ourselves regarding the market potential for our product candidates. Although we believe that such information has been, and will be, obtained from reliable sources, the sources of such data do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information. While we believe these industry publications and third-party research, surveys and studies are reliable, we do not independently verify such data. The results of this data represent various methodologies, assumptions, research, analysis, projections, estimates, composition of respondent pool, presentation of data and adjustments, each of which may ultimately prove to be incorrect or inaccurate and may cause actual results and market viability information to differ materially from that presented in any such reports or other materials that we may prepare.

On October 13, 2025, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation which (i) removed the dual class structure of the Company’s common stock and (ii) increased the number of shares of common stock that the Company is authorized to issue to 6,942,000,000 shares. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2026, the Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 6,942,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 50,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share. In connection with this change, all shares of the Company’s class B common stock were reclassified as common stock. Accordingly, all references herein to “common stock” issued prior to October 13, 2025 are to the Company’s prior class B common stock.

We may not be able to maintain a listing of our common stock on NYSE American.

We must meet certain financial and liquidity criteria to maintain the listing of our common stock on NYSE American. If we fail to meet any of NYSE American’s continued listing standards or we violate NYSE American listing requirements, our common stock may be delisted. In addition, our board of directors may determine that the cost of maintaining our listing on a national securities exchange outweighs the benefits of such a listing. A delisting of our common stock from NYSE American may materially impair our stockholders’ ability to buy and sell our common stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our common stock. The delisting of our common stock could significantly impair our ability to raise capital and the value of your investment.

The market price of our stock may be highly volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The market for our common stock may be characterized by significant price volatility when compared to the shares of larger, more established companies that have large public floats, and we expect that our stock price will be more volatile than the shares of such larger, more established companies for the indefinite future. The stock market in general has recently been highly volatile. We may also experience such volatility, which may be unrelated to our actual or expected operating performance and financial condition or prospects, making it difficult for prospective investors to assess the rapidly changing value of our common stock.

The market price of our common stock is likely to be volatile due to a number of factors. First, as noted above, our common stock is likely to be more sporadically and thinly traded compared to the shares of such larger, more established companies. The price for our common stock could, for example, decline precipitously in the event that a large number of shares are sold on the market without commensurate demand. Furthermore, we are a speculative or “risky” investment due to our lack of profits to date. As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the fear of losing all or most of their investment in the event of negative news or lack of progress, be more inclined to sell their shares on the market more quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a larger, more established company that has a large public float. Many of the foregoing factors are beyond our control and may decrease the market price of our common stock regardless of our operating performance. The market price of our common stock could also be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a broad and diverse range of factors, including the following:

Volatility in the market price of our common stock may prevent investors from being able to sell their common stock at or above the price at which they purchased it. As a result, you may suffer a loss on your investment.

We do not expect to declare or pay dividends in the foreseeable future, as we anticipate that we will invest future earnings in the development and growth of our business. Therefore, holders of our common stock will not receive any return on their investment unless they sell their shares, and holders may be unable to sell their shares on favorable terms or at all.

Future issuances of our common stock or securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for, our common stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline and would result in the dilution of your holdings.

Future issuances of our common stock or securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for, our common stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future issuances of our securities on the price of our common stock. In all events, future issuances of our common stock would result in the dilution of your holdings. In addition, the perception that new issuances of our securities could occur could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Future issuances by Zone of debt securities, which would rank senior to our common stock upon our bankruptcy or liquidation, and future issuances of preferred stock, which could rank senior to our common stock for the purposes of dividends and liquidating distributions, may adversely affect the level of return you may be able to achieve from an investment in our common stock. Project level debt financing may be issued with different seniority than Zone issued debt securities and may not be subject to the same distributions.

In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by offering debt securities. Upon bankruptcy or liquidation, holders of our debt securities, and lenders with respect to other borrowings we may make, would receive distributions of our available assets prior to any distributions being made to holders of our common stock. Because our decision to issue debt in any future offering, or borrow money from lenders, will depend in part on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of any such future offerings or borrowings. Holders of our common stock must bear the risk that any future offerings we conduct or borrowings we make may adversely affect the level of return, if any, they may be able to achieve from an investment in our common stock.

We are subject to ongoing public reporting requirements that are less rigorous than rules for companies that are not emerging growth companies, and our stockholders could receive less information than they might expect to receive from more mature public companies.

We report on an ongoing basis as an “emerging growth company” (as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act) under the reporting rules set forth under the Exchange Act. For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other Exchange Act reporting companies that are not emerging growth companies, including but not limited to:

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. Our financial statements may therefore not be comparable to those of companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of our initial public offering, (ii) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our total annual gross revenues are $1.235 billion or more, (iii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (iv) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.

Because we are subject to ongoing public reporting requirements that are less rigorous than Exchange Act rules for companies that are not emerging growth companies, our stockholders could receive less information than they might expect to receive from more mature public companies. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive if we elect to rely on these exemptions, or if taking advantage of these exemptions would result in less active trading or more volatility in the price of our common stock.

We are also a smaller reporting company, and if we take advantage of certain exemptions from SEC disclosure requirements available to smaller reporting companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required and may not include a compensation discussion and analysis section in our proxy statements, and we provide only two years of financial statements. We also have other “scaled” disclosure requirements that are less comprehensive than issuers that are not smaller reporting companies which could make our common stock less attractive to potential investors, which could make it more difficult for our stockholders to sell their shares.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Nevada law could make an acquisition of our company more difficult, and limit attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of our company or changes in our management.

Our authorized but unissued shares of common stock are available for our board of directors to issue without stockholder approval, subject to NYSE American’s rules. We may use these additional shares for a variety of corporate purposes, including raising additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee stock plans. The existence of our authorized but unissued shares of common stock could render it more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of our company by means of a proxy context, tender offer, merger or other transaction since our board of directors can issue large amounts of capital stock as part of a defense to a take-over challenge. In addition, we have authorized in our articles of incorporation 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our board acting alone and without approval of our stockholders, subject to NYSE American’s rules, can designate and issue one or more series of preferred stock containing super-voting provisions, enhanced economic rights, rights to elect directors, or other dilutive features, that could be utilized as part of a defense to a take-over challenge.

In addition, various provisions of our bylaws may also have an anti-takeover effect. These provisions may delay, defer or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt of our company that a stockholder might consider in his or her best interest, including attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by our stockholders. Our bylaws may be adopted, amended or repealed only by our board of directors. Our bylaws also contain limitations as to who may call special meetings as well as require advance notice of stockholder matters to be brought at a meeting. Additionally, our bylaws also provide that no director may be removed by less than a two-thirds vote of the issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote on the removal. Our bylaws also permit the board of directors to establish the number of directors and fill any vacancies and newly created directorships. These provisions will prevent a stockholder from increasing the size of our board of directors and gaining control of our board of directors by filling the resulting vacancies with its own nominees.

Our bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting of our stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for election to the board of directors. Stockholders at an annual meeting will only be able to consider proposals or nominations specified in the notice of meeting or brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the board of directors or by a stockholder who was a stockholder of record on the record date for the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has given us timely written notice, in proper form, of the stockholder’s intention to bring that business before the meeting. Although our bylaws do not give the board of directors the power to approve or disapprove stockholder nominations of candidates or proposals regarding other business to be conducted at a special or annual meeting, our bylaws may have the effect of precluding the conduct of certain business at a meeting if the proper procedures are not followed or may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company.

Risks Relating to our AI Critical Infrastructure Business

Our AI Critical Infrastructure Business is at an early stage and subject to significant risks, and we may be unable to implement it successfully.

Our AI Critical Infrastructure Business is at an early stage of development. On July 9, 2026, we closed on our first data center campus, located in West Texas, with development platform provider HST Technologies, Inc. On July 23, 2026, we completed the acquisition of a second campus located in Minnesota, which is currently under construction and is subject to a fully executed 10-year tenancy agreement with Cerebras Systems, a leading AI compute company. Although we have entered into these binding agreements and commenced construction activities, we have not yet generated any revenue from this business, and the AI Critical Infrastructure Business is subject to significant risks. Because our strategy is evolving, we are required to make significant assumptions regarding market conditions, customer demand, competition, capital availability, utilization, operating costs, technological developments, regulatory requirements and other factors, and these assumptions may prove to be incorrect. We may fail to develop a viable operating model, generate revenue, achieve profitability or create stockholder value. If we are unable to execute this business plan successfully, or if our assumptions prove incorrect or our strategy changes materially, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected, and the value of our common stock could decline substantially.

We have limited operating history in the AI critical infrastructure or data center industry, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully operate our data center campuses or consummate additional transactions related to our AI Critical Infrastructure Business.

We have historically operated as a cleaning products company and, more recently, as a digital asset treasury company. We have limited experience in the development, acquisition, construction, or operation of data centers or computing infrastructure. Although we have entered into binding agreements for two data center campuses and a 10-year tenancy agreement with Cerebras Systems for our Minnesota campus, we have limited operating history in this industry and there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully develop, construct and operate our data center facilities or identify and consummate additional transactions on commercially acceptable terms, or at all. The data center and AI critical infrastructure market is highly competitive, and established operators, hyperscale cloud providers, and well-capitalized new entrants may have significant advantages over us, including greater financial resources, existing relationships, technical expertise and established track records. We may be unable to compete effectively for available sites, power capacity, equipment or customers, or to complete the necessary due diligence, obtain financing, negotiate acceptable terms, obtain regulatory approvals or permits, or close transactions in a timely manner, or at all. If we are unable to successfully operate our existing campuses or consummate additional transactions related to our AI Critical Infrastructure Business, we may have expended significant time, capital and management resources without generating any return.

The AI Critical Infrastructure Business requires specialized technical, operational, commercial and financial expertise that we may be unable to attract, retain or develop, and our current management team and personnel have limited or no experience in this business.

The successful implementation of our anticipated strategy will depend on our ability to recruit, retain and manage personnel with specialized expertise in areas such as data center design, construction and operations, power procurement and management, cooling systems, high-performance computing, network architecture, enterprise sales, leasing and cybersecurity. Our management team has historically operated a cleaning products business, and more recently, a digital asset treasury strategy focused on Dogecoin. We may have limited or no institutional knowledge in the computing infrastructure industry. Such personnel are in high demand and may command compensation significantly greater than we have historically paid. If we are unable to develop or acquire the necessary capabilities in a timely or cost-effective manner, or if key personnel depart, our ability to execute our strategy could be materially impaired.

Our management team must manage the demands of operating multiple distinct businesses during our strategic transition, which may strain our limited resources and impair our ability to execute any of our business strategies effectively.

Our management team is currently responsible for operating our legacy cleaning products business and our digital asset treasury strategy, while simultaneously investigating and developing our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business. These responsibilities span three fundamentally different industries and require significant time and attention, which may divert management attention and resources from any particular business line and may impair our ability to make timely and effective operational and strategic decisions. We are a small company with limited personnel and financial resources, and the simultaneous pursuit of multiple strategic objectives may exceed our organizational capacity. If our management team is unable to manage these competing priorities successfully, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially adversely affected.

Demand for AI-related or high-performance computing infrastructure may not grow as expected, may be satisfied by competitors, or may prove to be temporary, and our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business may not succeed.

Our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business is predicated on the assumption that demand for data center capacity and computing infrastructure will continue to grow, driven by the proliferation of large language models, generative AI applications, enterprise AI adoption, cloud computing workloads and other compute-intensive applications. However, demand for AI-related computing infrastructure may not grow as expected, may grow more slowly than anticipated, may become concentrated in the hands of a small number of large incumbents, or may be satisfied through technologies, business models or providers that do not benefit us. Customers may prefer to procure computing capacity from hyperscale cloud providers, vertically integrated platforms, strategic partners or operators with established technical, operational and financing capabilities, rather than from a company with no operating history in this industry. In addition, current market enthusiasm for AI critical infrastructure may reflect speculative activity, temporary shortages, unusually strong capital spending by a limited number of participants, or expectations that are not sustained. If market enthusiasm proves temporary, if capital investment in this sector declines, if AI workloads become less infrastructure-intensive than expected, or if demand for our anticipated offerings does not materialize, our strategy may not succeed and we could lose all or a substantial portion of the capital we invest in this business.

We may be unable to secure adequate power supply, which is critical to data center operations, and power costs and availability may adversely affect our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business.

Data center operations require significant and reliable power supply. The availability of power at commercially reasonable prices is a critical factor in the site selection, development and operation of data center facilities. In many markets, power supply is constrained, and demand from data centers and other large-scale energy consumers is increasing competition for available power capacity. We may be unable to secure adequate power supply on acceptable terms or at all for any data center facilities we may seek to develop or acquire. In addition, power costs may be volatile and may increase significantly due to changes in energy markets, regulatory requirements, transmission and distribution charges, carbon pricing, renewable energy mandates and other factors. Power outages, grid instability, curtailment requirements or force majeure events could disrupt data center operations and damage computing equipment, resulting in service interruptions, customer losses, liability and reputational harm. If we are unable to secure reliable, cost-effective power supply, our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business may not be viable or competitive.

The AI critical infrastructure and data center industry is subject to extensive regulation, and changes in law or regulation could materially adversely affect our anticipated business.

The development, construction and operation of data center facilities are subject to a broad range of federal, state and local laws and regulations, including zoning and land use requirements, building codes, environmental regulations, energy efficiency standards, water usage restrictions, noise ordinances, fire safety requirements, telecommunications regulations and tax laws. Compliance with these requirements may be costly and time-consuming, and we may be unable to obtain necessary permits, approvals or variances in a timely manner, or at all. Changes in applicable laws or regulations, including new or more stringent environmental requirements, energy consumption limitations, data privacy laws or export controls and tariffs, could increase our compliance costs, restrict our ability to develop or operate data center facilities, reduce the economic viability of particular sites or projects, or otherwise adversely affect our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business. In addition, there is increasing public and regulatory scrutiny of the energy consumption and environmental impact of data centers, and government authorities may impose restrictions, taxes, or requirements on data center operations that could increase our costs or limit our ability to operate.

If we are unable to enter into additional profitable leases, hosting agreements, colocation arrangements or other monetization structures, or if our existing arrangements do not perform as expected, the AI Critical Infrastructure Business may fail.

Our strategy contemplates the monetization of data center assets and computing infrastructure through one or more transaction structures, including colocation arrangements, build-to-suit agreements, powered shell leases, hosting agreements and other monetization structures. We have entered into a 10-year colocation agreement with Cerebras Systems for our Minnesota campus, with potential for two 10-year extension options. However, there can be no assurance that this arrangement will be profitable or perform as expected, or that we will be able to identify additional counterparties willing to enter into such arrangements on commercially acceptable terms or at all. Even if such arrangements are entered into, they may not be profitable, may involve significant risk allocation in favor of the counterparty, may require substantial customization or negotiation and may expose us to operational, legal, tax, accounting and credit risks. If we are unable to structure and consummate attractive monetization transactions, any data center assets we acquire or develop may remain underutilized or idle, our returns may be materially impaired and our business may not be successful.

Technology in the AI critical infrastructure industry evolves rapidly, and our anticipated investments could become obsolete or less competitive.

The computing infrastructure industry is characterized by rapid technological change, including advancements in GPU architecture, server design, cooling technologies, networking equipment, power management systems and software-defined infrastructure. Technologies, configurations and specifications that are current today may become obsolete, less efficient, or less competitive in a relatively short period of time. If we invest significant capital in data center infrastructure or computing equipment that becomes technologically obsolete or is superseded by newer, more efficient or more cost-effective alternatives, we may be unable to realize acceptable returns on our investments and may be required to record significant impairment charges. In addition, our potential customers may require specific or cutting-edge technology configurations that we are unable to provide, which could limit our ability to attract or retain customers.

Our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business may be affected by export controls, tariffs, sanctions and trade restrictions that could limit our ability to acquire necessary equipment or serve certain customers.

The acquisition and deployment of computing infrastructure, including GPUs, servers, networking equipment and related components, may be subject to export controls, tariffs, sanctions, trade restrictions and other governmental regulations that could limit our ability to procure necessary equipment, increase our costs, restrict our customer base or otherwise adversely affect our anticipated business. Changes in trade policy, including the imposition of new tariffs, export restrictions or sanctions, could materially increase the cost of computing equipment, delay procurement timelines or make certain equipment unavailable. Any such developments could materially adversely affect our ability to develop and operate our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business.

Our disclosures regarding our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business necessarily involve substantial estimates and assumptions and may become inaccurate or incomplete as circumstances evolve.

Because our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business is at a very early stage, our public disclosures regarding the business, opportunities, risks, economics, financing needs, market demand, asset acquisition plans, monetization strategies and expected results necessarily depend on estimates, expectations and assumptions that may prove to be incomplete, inaccurate or subject to rapid change. In many cases, we may have only limited operating experience or third-party information on which to base such judgments. As a result, subsequent developments may differ materially from what is described in our public filings. Investors should not rely on our current disclosures regarding the anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business as indicative of future results. If our assumptions prove incorrect, if we are unable to execute our strategy, or if material information becomes available that changes our assessment of the opportunity, we may need to revise our strategy, disclosures and projections, which could adversely affect investor confidence and the trading price of our common stock.

We may need to build entirely new systems, financial reporting, disclosure, accounting, operational and internal control systems to support the anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business, which will be costly, time-consuming and may not be successful.

Our existing financial reporting, disclosure controls, accounting systems, internal controls over financial reporting, and operational processes have been developed to support a cleaning products business and a digital asset treasury strategy. The anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business will likely require fundamentally different systems, processes and controls, including those related to fixed asset accounting, depreciation, capitalization of development costs, lease accounting, revenue recognition for colocation or hosting arrangements, power and utility cost allocation, project accounting, construction-in-progress tracking and impairment analysis. Developing and implementing these new systems and controls will require significant investment of time, capital and personnel resources, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so successfully or in a timely manner. If we are unable to maintain effective financial reporting and internal control systems as we transition to a new business model, we may fail to report financial information accurately, may be required to restate financial statements, may become subject to SEC scrutiny or stockholder claims and may suffer reputational harm.

Public company costs may consume a disproportionate amount of our limited resources, reducing capital available for the AI Critical Infrastructure Business.

As a public company, we incur significant ongoing costs for SEC reporting, NYSE American compliance, legal counsel, audit and accounting services, directors’ and officers’ insurance, investor relations and corporate governance. These costs are largely fixed and do not scale proportionally with our revenue or asset base. Given our limited financial resources and the capital-intensive nature of our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business, public company costs may consume a disproportionate share of our available capital, reducing the amount available for investment in AI critical infrastructure opportunities and potentially impairing our ability to compete effectively against larger, better-capitalized competitors.

The transition from our current business lines to the AI Critical Infrastructure Business could expose us to stockholder litigation, regulatory scrutiny and reputational harm.

Our proposed strategic transition from a cleaning products and digital asset treasury company to an AI critical infrastructure company represents a fundamental change in our business direction. Some stockholders, employees, customers, investors or other stakeholders may view this shift negatively or may assert that the Company has departed from their expectations. As a result, we may experience reputational harm, stakeholder criticism, litigation, derivative claims, books-and-records demands or other disputes relating to our change in business strategy, disclosures, corporate governance or the process by which our board of directors evaluated and approved the transition. Any such matters could be time-consuming, costly and distracting, could divert management’s attention from the execution of our business strategy and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects.

We may fail to transition successfully from a cleaning products and digital asset treasury company to a computing infrastructure company.

The successful operation of a computing infrastructure business requires capabilities that differ substantially from those required to operate a cleaning products business or a digital asset treasury strategy, including expertise in site selection and development, power procurement and grid interconnection, data center construction management, structuring leases, managing facility and equipment life cycles, evaluating utilization and residual value risk, negotiating technical services and colocation arrangements, complying with industry-specific regulations. We may be unable to develop or acquire these capabilities in a timely or cost-effective manner, and may experience difficulty adapting our internal processes, financial reporting systems, disclosure controls and risk management framework to support a fundamentally different business model. If we are unable to manage this transition effectively, our business and prospects could be materially harmed.

The anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business may never generate meaningful revenue, achieve profitability or produce positive cash flow.

Our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business may require substantial upfront capital expenditures, ongoing operating expenditures and significant management attention before it generates any material revenue, if at all. There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate customer demand, establish commercially reasonable pricing, maintain satisfactory utilization rates, structure profitable monetization arrangements or achieve sufficient scale to cover our costs. Even if we generate revenue, our costs may be greater than we expect, including costs associated with acquiring or developing data center sites, financing, construction, maintenance, power, hosting, insurance, professional services, regulatory compliance, public company obligations, personnel and litigation. As a result, we may continue to incur losses for an extended period or indefinitely, and we may never achieve profitability or positive cash flow. If that occurs, the value of our business and our common stock could decline materially.

We will face intense competition from larger, more experienced and significantly better-capitalized companies, and we may be unable to compete effectively.

The computing infrastructure and data center market is intensely competitive and evolving rapidly. We expect to compete, directly or indirectly, with large technology companies, hyperscale cloud providers, established data center developers and operators, colocation providers, investment firms and other market participants with substantially greater financial, technical, operational resources than we have. Many of these competitors have longer operating histories, more established brands, deeper customer relationships, superior access to capital, more sophisticated technical capabilities and greater tolerance for risk. These competitors may be able to acquire or develop data center sites at lower cost, offer more attractive terms, deploy assets more quickly and secure customers and strategic relationships more successfully than we can. Our limited resources may materially impair our ability to compete, generate revenue and create stockholder value.

We have significantly fewer resources than many of the companies with which we would compete, which could materially impair our ability to execute our business plan.

Our available cash, restricted cash, remaining assets and organizational resources are extremely limited relative to our anticipated capital needs. Larger and more established companies have access to more favorable financing, stronger supplier relationships, greater technical expertise, lower cost structures and more diversified revenue streams. Because our resources are expected to be substantially more limited than those of many competitors and counterparties in this market, we may be unable to pursue attractive opportunities, withstand pricing pressure, tolerate delays in monetization, absorb operational setbacks or respond effectively to changes in market conditions. If we are unable to compete effectively due to our limited resources, our business, financial condition and prospects could be materially adversely affected.

Our ability to execute the anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business will depend on our ability to obtain substantial capital, and such capital may not be available on acceptable terms or at all.

The development and acquisition of data center infrastructure may require substantial capital. The proceeds of our recent offering may not be sufficient to fund our strategy, operations or liquidity needs, and we may require additional debt or equity financing sooner than we currently expect. We expect to continue to incur significant cash needs, including for personnel costs, public company costs, professional fees, transaction expenses, working capital, debt service and the costs of attempting to develop the anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business. Our cash resources may be exhausted more quickly than we expect, and we may run out of cash before we are able to secure additional financing. Capital markets conditions, our limited operating history in the new business, the speculative nature of our strategy, trading volatility in our common stock, our financial condition, investor sentiment regarding our transition and other factors may make it difficult or impossible for us to obtain additional capital on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If financing is unavailable or available only on unfavorable terms, we may be forced to delay or abandon development projects, curtail operations, sell assets at unattractive prices, issue additional equity that is highly dilutive, incur restrictive indebtedness, drastically reduce expenses, cease operations, declare bankruptcy, or pursue other strategic alternatives. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we may run out of cash. Any of these outcomes could materially adversely affect our business and stockholders.

The market price of our common stock may not reflect the fundamental value or prospects of the anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business, and any increase in our stock price following announcement of such business may not be sustained.

The market price of our common stock may be influenced by speculation, momentum trading, limited public float, short covering, media attention, social media commentary, investor enthusiasm regarding artificial intelligence or computing infrastructure themes, or other factors unrelated or disproportionate to our underlying business fundamentals. Following announcement of our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business, our stock price may experience substantial volatility or appreciation. There can be no assurance that any such increase will be sustained. Investors may have only limited information regarding our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business and may make investment decisions based on assumptions about our future business that do not materialize. If market expectations change, if our business plan is not executed successfully, if our financing arrangements prove insufficient or restrictive, if our disclosures are challenged, or if broader market sentiment weakens, the market price of our common stock could decline sharply, and stockholders could lose all or a substantial portion of their investment.

Counterparties to our leases, hosting agreements, colocation arrangements or other transactions may default, terminate early, fail to renew or otherwise not perform as expected.

If we enter into leases, hosting agreements, colocation arrangements, powered shell leases, build-to-suit agreements or other commercial contracts, we will be exposed to counterparty credit, performance and enforcement risk. Our counterparties may become unwilling or unable to perform their obligations, may dispute contractual terms, may seek concessions, may terminate agreements early, may fail to renew agreements or may become insolvent or bankrupt. Any such nonperformance could reduce our revenues, impair the value of our data center assets, increase our costs, require costly enforcement efforts, result in litigation or force us to re-market capacity on less favorable terms. These risks may be heightened in periods of economic volatility or in emerging or rapidly changing markets. Counterparty nonperformance could materially adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Transactions with external parties through SPVs and other investment structures expose us to heightened risks of default, disagreement, bankruptcy and personnel changes that could impair our investments and operations.

Our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business will involve entering into transactions with a variety of external parties, including development partners, operating partners, tenants, contractors, vendors, lenders and other counterparties, many of which may be conducted through special purpose vehicles, joint ventures or similar investment structures. These arrangements expose us to significant risks that could materially impair our investments and operations.

External parties with whom we transact may default on their contractual obligations, including capital contribution commitments, development milestones, payment obligations, operational responsibilities or other material covenants. Counterparties may dispute the interpretation or enforceability of contractual terms, refuse to perform, seek to renegotiate arrangements, or pursue litigation or arbitration to resolve disagreements. These disputes may be costly, time-consuming and distracting to management, and their outcomes may be uncertain. Even if we ultimately prevail in a dispute, the process of enforcement may delay project completion, impair relationships with other parties or damage our reputation.

External parties may experience financial distress, insolvency or bankruptcy, which could trigger defaults under governing agreements, impair the SPV’s ability to perform under its contracts, create uncertainty regarding ownership and governance, delay or prevent the completion of development activities, expose us to claims from creditors of the distressed party, or result in the loss of a substantial portion of our invested capital. Bankruptcy proceedings involving a partner, tenant, contractor or other counterparty may be protracted, unpredictable and costly, and may result in outcomes that are materially adverse to our interests. We may have limited ability to assess the creditworthiness or financial condition of our counterparties, and our due diligence may not reveal all material risks associated with their financial stability.

The success of our SPV investments and external party transactions may depend significantly on the continued involvement of key personnel at our partners, tenants, contractors and other counterparties. Changes in personnel, including the departure of individuals with specialized expertise in data center development, power procurement, tenant relationships, project management or other critical functions, could materially impair a counterparty’s ability to perform its obligations under our agreements. We may have limited visibility into personnel changes at counterparty organizations and limited recourse if key individuals depart. The loss of key personnel at a development partner, operating partner or other critical counterparty could result in delays, cost overruns, execution failures or the termination of arrangements, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business may be exposed to residual value risk and remarketing risk with respect to data center facilities and equipment.

If we acquire or develop data center facilities and seek to monetize them through leases, hosting agreements or other arrangements, the returns on those assets may depend in part on the residual value of the facilities and equipment at the end of a contractual term or anticipated holding period. The residual value of data center infrastructure may be difficult to predict and may decline materially due to technological change, changes in customer preferences, increased supply, reduced demand, shifts in geographic demand patterns, changes in power costs, the introduction of newer or more efficient facility designs, changes in cooling or power delivery technology or other market developments. If the residual value of any data center assets is lower than we expect, we may be unable to sell, re-lease, redeploy or otherwise monetize those assets on favorable terms or at all. We may also be required to reduce pricing, accept lower returns, record impairment charges or incur additional costs in remarketing or reconfiguring assets. Any such developments could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our anticipated business model depends on assumptions regarding customer demand, pricing, utilization, residual values and monetization opportunities that may prove incorrect.

We expect that the AI Critical Infrastructure Business may involve colocation arrangements, powered shell leases, build-to-suit agreements, hosting arrangements and other monetization structures. The success of these arrangements would depend on numerous assumptions, including assumptions regarding demand from potential customers, the pricing they are willing to pay, contract duration, uptime requirements, facility utilization, residual values, maintenance costs, power and cooling costs, financing costs, counterparty creditworthiness and the availability of secondary market opportunities. If any of these assumptions prove to be incorrect, our anticipated business model may not be viable or may be materially less profitable than we currently expect. In particular, lower-than-expected utilization, pricing pressure, higher-than-expected costs, counterparty defaults or lower residual values could materially adversely affect our revenues, margins, asset values and overall business.

Investors may have difficulty evaluating our future prospects because we will be a company with a limited operating history in a new business and no historical information relevant to that business.

Investors will have no historical financial information relevant to the anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business. Our historical financial statements primarily reflect a cleaning products business and, more recently, a digital asset treasury strategy, each of which is materially different businesses from data center development and operations. Accordingly, historical results may not be indicative of future performance, and investors may find it difficult to evaluate our prospects, strategy, valuation and risks. This limited visibility may contribute to volatility in our common stock, impair investor confidence and make it more difficult for us to raise capital. If investors are unable to assess our future prospects accurately, the market price of our common stock could be materially adversely affected.

The proposed change in our corporate name, identity and strategic direction may create confusion, reduce credibility and harm our ability to establish the anticipated new business.

We are proposing to transition from a cleaning products and digital asset treasury company to an AI critical infrastructure company. This change in identity and strategic direction may include a change in company name, and may create confusion among investors, counterparties, employees and other stakeholders regarding who we are, what business we are in and what capabilities we possess. Some market participants may question the credibility or viability of our new strategy or may be reluctant to transact with us until we establish a track record in the new business. Any reputational challenges, uncertainty or skepticism arising from our change in business direction could impair our ability to hire personnel, attract counterparties, raise capital and create stockholder value.

If the anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business is unsuccessful, we may be unable to continue as a going concern.

The success of our continuing business plan is uncertain. If we are unable to implement the anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business successfully, generate meaningful revenues, raise sufficient capital, manage costs, satisfy obligations or otherwise sustain operations, we may not be able to continue as a going concern. We have historically incurred significant operating losses and have an accumulated deficit of approximately $169 million as of March 31, 2026. If we are unable to generate sufficient revenue or raise additional capital, we may need to seek additional financing on unfavorable terms, sell assets, drastically reduce operations, restructure obligations or pursue strategic transactions. Any such outcome could materially reduce or eliminate value for stockholders.

Stockholders may not realize the benefits they expect from our proposed strategic transition and may lose all or a substantial portion of their investment.

The contemplated sale or disposition of our cleaning products business, the contemplated sale, disposition, or wind-down of our Dogecoin holdings, and our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business may not produce the benefits that stockholders expect. The Company may fail to execute its continuing business strategy, may experience severe stock price volatility, may be unable to maintain its NYSE American listing, may incur substantial litigation or financing costs, may be unable to raise additional capital and may ultimately fail. If one or more of these risks materialize, the market price of our common stock could decline materially, and stockholders could lose all or a substantial portion of their investment.

We may be exposed to tax risks associated with asset acquisitions, leasing structures, hosting arrangements and other monetization arrangements.

Our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business may involve complex domestic, state, local and potentially international tax issues. The tax treatment of asset acquisitions, ownership, leasing transactions, hosting arrangements, financing arrangements, depreciation, revenue streams, property taxes, sales and use taxes, transfer taxes and other aspects of our anticipated business may be uncertain and may depend on highly technical rules and factual determinations. Tax authorities may challenge our positions, and changes in tax law, tax rates, regulations, administrative guidance or judicial interpretations could adversely affect the economics of our business model. In addition, tax compliance associated with asset-intensive and multi-jurisdictional operations may be costly and burdensome, and may require use of external resources. If our tax positions are challenged successfully, or if the expected tax treatment of our transactions is not realized, we could incur additional taxes, penalties, interest and professional fees, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The data center project contemplated by our letter of intent requires capital commitments that substantially exceed our current financial resources, and we may be unable to secure adequate capital resources through debt or equity to fund our obligations under the proposed transaction.

The letter of intent contemplates significant capital commitments for the development and buildout of the data center facility. As of March 31, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $4.1 million, restricted cash of approximately $13 million and an accumulated deficit of approximately $169 million. We will need to raise significant additional capital through debt financing, equity financing, project-level financing or other sources to fund these commitments, and there can be no assurance that such financing will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to fund our capital commitments to the project SPV in a timely manner, we may be required to seek third-party capital on potentially unfavorable terms, may lose our majority ownership interest or other economic benefits under the proposed transaction structure, may be subject to dilution or adverse renegotiation of terms, or may be unable to consummate or continue to participate in the transaction. Any such outcome could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects and could result in a significant loss of the capital we have invested.

Our initial AI critical infrastructure strategy will likely be concentrated in a limited number of projects, and we will be dependent on our development and operating partners, which exposes us to significant concentration, execution and counterparty risks.

Our initial AI critical infrastructure opportunities will be concentrated in a limited number of data center projects. As a result, our near-term AI Critical Infrastructure Business strategy is highly concentrated and dependent on the successful execution of these projects. If any project encounters delays, cost overruns, construction difficulties, permitting issues, power procurement challenges, equipment supply disruptions, financing shortfalls or other setbacks, or if a tenant fails to execute a definitive lease, terminates its arrangement, defaults on its obligations, reduces its capacity requirements or becomes insolvent, our AI Critical Infrastructure Business could be materially impaired before it has generated significant revenue or diversified across a broader portfolio of projects or tenants. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, evaluate or consummate additional AI critical infrastructure opportunities to reduce this concentration.

In addition, under the proposed transaction structures, our development partners would serve as the development, operating and execution partners for our projects, with authority and responsibilities over development, utility coordination, tenant coordination, vendor management, construction oversight, commissioning support, operations and transition matters, subject to agreed budgets, major decision rights and SPV governance. We would hold majority ownership interests in the project SPVs, but our development partners would retain day-to-day operational control over critical development and construction activities. We have limited ability to independently verify our development partners’ operational capabilities, track records and financial conditions, and our due diligence may not reveal all material risks associated with these counterparties. If any development partner fails to perform its development, construction or operational obligations effectively, experiences financial difficulties, loses key personnel, becomes involved in disputes with contractors, vendors or tenants, or otherwise fails to meet project milestones and delivery standards, the affected project could experience significant delays, cost overruns or failure, and we could lose a substantial portion of our invested capital. Disagreements between us and our development partners regarding project decisions, budget allocations, governance matters, capital calls, distribution mechanics or strategic direction could result in deadlock, litigation or other disputes that impair the projects and our investments. Our reliance on a limited number of development partners for our initial AI critical infrastructure projects amplifies these risks.

Our anticipated AI Critical Infrastructure Business may be conducted through special purpose vehicles and joint venture structures, which expose us to governance, counterparty and structural risks that could materially impair our investments.

We may conduct some of our AI Critical Infrastructure Business through special purpose vehicles, joint ventures and similar structures in which we hold ownership interests alongside development partners, operating partners or other third parties. These structures involve inherent risks that differ from, and may be in addition to, the risks of operating assets directly. We may not control the day-to-day management or key decisions of the SPV, or may share governance or approval rights with partners whose interests may not always align with ours. Disputes may arise regarding capital contributions, development timelines, budgets, distributions, exit strategies, refinancing decisions, major contracts, admission of new partners or other material matters, and such disputes could result in deadlock, litigation, forced buyouts or dissolution of the venture.

Our partners in these structures may default on capital call obligations, fail to fund their pro rata share of development costs, become insolvent or file for bankruptcy, experience a change of control, lose key personnel critical to the project, or otherwise become unable or unwilling to perform their obligations under the governing agreements. A partner’s financial distress or bankruptcy could trigger complex legal proceedings, impair the SPV’s ability to access financing or perform under its contracts, create uncertainty regarding ownership and governance, and delay or prevent the completion of development activities. The departure or replacement of key personnel at a partner entity, particularly individuals with specialized expertise in data center development, power procurement or tenant relationships, could materially impair the partner’s ability to execute on project milestones and deliverables.

In addition, SPV and joint venture structures may limit our ability to unilaterally sell, transfer or encumber our interests, may subject us to rights of first refusal, tag-along or drag-along provisions, buy-sell mechanisms or other transfer restrictions that limit our liquidity and exit options. We may be unable to exit an underperforming investment on acceptable terms or in a timely manner. The governing documents of these structures may also contain forfeiture, clawback, dilution or penalty provisions that could reduce our economic interest if we fail to meet capital call obligations or other commitments. If any of these risks materialize, our investments in SPVs and joint ventures could be impaired, we could lose a substantial portion of our invested capital, and our business, financial condition and prospects could be materially adversely affected.