DUKE Robotics Corp.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2025

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

KPMG Somekh Chaikin

KPMG Millennium Tower

17 Ha’arba’a street, PO Box 609

Tel Aviv 6100601 Israel

+972 3 684 8000

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

DUKE Robotics Corp.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of DUKE Robotics Corp. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations and has an accumulated deficit that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

KPMG Somekh Chaikin, an Israeli partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Valuation of warrant liability

As discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, as part of the private placement offering completed on December 30, 2025, the Company issued investors warrants to purchase 83,338 Company’s Common Stock. The warrants have been classified as a liability instrument because of a make-whole provision. The warrants are recorded at fair value amounting to $189 thousand as of December 31, 2025 and will be remeasured at fair value at each reporting date. The Company used both the Monte Carlo Simulation Model and Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value the warrant liability. Key inputs to the models included the Company’s underlying share price, conversion price, risk-free interest rate, expected dividend yield, expected term in years, expected offering date and expected volatility.

We identified the evaluation of the fair value of the warrant liability as a critical audit matter. A high degree of auditor judgment, and specialized skills and knowledge, were required in the evaluation of the estimated fair value due to the degree of subjectivity associated with the expected volatility and its sensitivity to variation.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design of certain internal controls over the Company’s warrant liability valuation process, including controls related to the determination of the expected volatility. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

/s/ Somekh Chaikin

Member Firm of KPMG International

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2023.

Tel Aviv, Israel

March 12, 2026