New ERA Energy & Digital, Inc.

From time to time, we may be party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We recognize provisions for legal proceedings in our financial statements, in accordance with accounting rules, when we are advised by independent outside counsel that (i) it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and (ii) a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. The assessment of the likelihood of loss includes analysis by outside counsel of available evidence, the hierarchy of laws, available case law, recent court rulings and their relevance in the legal system. Our provisions for probable losses arising from these matters are estimated and periodically adjusted by management. In making these adjustments our management relies on the opinions of our external legal advisors.

On December 23, 2025, the State of New Mexico filed a lawsuit against the Company and other parties, including Chief Executive Officer E. Will Gray II, in the First Judicial District Court for Santa Fe County (“New Mexico Litigation”). The complaint alleges several causes of action, including for unjust enrichment, violations of the New Mexico Oil and Gas Act, violations of the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act, Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, civil conspiracy, and veil piercing, and seeks, among other relief, damages, civil penalties, costs, and attorneys’ fees. The New Mexico Litigation was stayed shortly after it was initiated because of the ongoing bankruptcy proceedings for several unrelated defendants. The case is in its early stages and will remain in abeyance until the bankruptcy court lifts the stay.

In response to the New Mexico Litigation and reports by purported short sellers on subject matters similar to those alleged in the lawsuit, the independent members of the Board promptly initiated and conducted an internal investigation into the allegations, with the assistance of independent outside counsel. The investigation considered, among other things, the State of New Mexico’s allegations that the Company’s subsidiary, Solis Partners, LLC, and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Gray, tried to place the burden of plugging, abandoning, and reclaiming numerous oil and gas wells owned by Acacia Resources, LLC on the State of New Mexico. The investigation included review of documents and many interviews. No limits were placed on the scope of the investigation. The investigation found no facts supporting the allegations of wrongdoing in the short seller reports or the New Mexico Litigation by Solis Partners, LLC, Mr. Gray, the Company, or any entities associated with Mr. Gray.

We may incur significant legal and other fees and costs to resolve the New Mexico Litigation. We are not currently able to estimate the possible cost to us from the New Mexico Litigation, as this matter is currently at an early stage and we cannot be certain how long it may take to resolve this matter or the possible amount of any damages that we may be required to pay. We could, in the future, incur an adverse judgment or enter into a settlement for monetary damages as a result of the New Mexico Litigation. During the pendency of our litigation, we may be unable to consummate our contemplated sale of legacy natural gas assets. If the New Mexico Litigation results in the payment of substantial damages by us or our ability to monetize existing assets, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.