EON Resources Inc.

EON Resources, Inc. (formerly HNR Acquisition Corp) (the “Company” or “EON”), was incorporated in Delaware as a blank check company formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses or entities. Prior to closing the Purchase, our efforts were limited to organizational activities, completion of an initial public offering and the evaluation of possible business combinations. On February 15, 2022, we consummated the Initial Public Offering of 7,500,000 units (the “Units”), at $10.00 per Unit, generating proceeds of $75,000,000. Additionally, the underwriter fully exercised its option to purchase 1,125,000 additional Units, for which we received cash proceeds of $11,250,000. Simultaneously with the closing of the Initial Public Offering, we consummated the sale of 505,000 private placement units at a price of $10.00 per unit generating proceeds of $5,050,000 in a private placement to our Sponsor and EF Hutton (formerly Kingswood Capital Markets) (“EF Hutton”). On April 4, 2022, the Units separated into Class A Common Stock and warrants, and ceased trading. On April 4, 2022, the Class A Common Stock and warrants commenced trading on the NYSE American. On September 16, 2024, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment (the “Certificate of Amendment”) to its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to change the Company’s name from “HNR Acquisition Corp” to “EON Resources Inc.”, effective on September 17, 2024.

We identified as the initial target for our initial business combination. Our efforts to identify a prospective target business were limited to a particular industry or geographic region. While we were permitted to pursue an acquisition opportunity in any industry or sector, we focused on assets used in exploring, developing, producing, transporting, storing, gathering, processing, fractionating, refining, distributing or marketing of natural gas, natural gas liquids, crude oil or refined products in North America.

Purchase

On December 27, 2022, we, entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Original MIPA”) with CIC Pogo LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“CIC”), DenCo Resources, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“DenCo”), Pogo Resources Management, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Pogo Management”), 4400 Holdings, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“4400” and, together with CIC, DenCo and Pogo Management, collectively, “Seller” and each a “Seller”), and, solely with respect to Section 7.20 of the Original MIPA, HNRAC Sponsors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Sponsor”). On August 28, 2023, we, HNRA Upstream, LLC, a newly formed Delaware limited liability company which is managed by us, and is a subsidiary of ours (“OpCo”), and HNRA Partner, Inc., a newly formed Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of ours (“SPAC Subsidiary”, and together with us and OpCo, “Buyer” and each a “Buyer”), entered into an Amended and Restated Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “A&R MIPA”) with Seller, and, solely with respect to Section 6.20 of the A&R MIPA, the Sponsor, which amended and restated the Original MIPA in its entirety (as amended and restated, the “MIPA”). Our stockholders approved the transactions contemplated by the MIPA at a special meeting of stockholders that was originally convened October 30, 2023, adjourned, and then reconvened on November 13, 2023 (the “Special Meeting”).

On November 15, 2023 (the “Closing Date”), as contemplated by the MIPA:

The “Aggregate Consideration” for the Target Interests was: (a) cash in the amount of $31,074,127 in immediately available funds (the “Cash Consideration”), (b) 2,000,000 Class B common units of OpCo (“OpCo Class B Units”) valued at $10.00 per unit (the “Common Unit Consideration”), which will be equal to and exchangeable into 2,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the OpCo Exchange Right (as defined below), as reflected in the amended and restated limited liability company agreement of OpCo that became effective at Closing (the “A&R OpCo LLC Agreement”), (c) the Seller Class B Shares, (d) $15,000,000 payable through a promissory note to Seller (the “Seller Promissory Note”), (e) 1,500,000 preferred units (the “OpCo Preferred Units” and together with the Opco Class A Units and the OpCo Class B Units, the “OpCo Units”) of OpCo (the “Preferred Unit Consideration”, and, together with the Common Unit Consideration, the “Unit Consideration”), and (f) an agreement for Buyer, on or before November 21, 2023, to settle and pay to Seller $1,925,873 from sales proceeds received from oil and gas production attributable to Pogo, including pursuant to its third party contract with affiliates of Chevron. At Closing, 500,000 Seller Class B Shares (the “Escrowed Share Consideration”) were placed in escrow for the benefit of Buyer pursuant to an escrow agreement and the indemnity provisions in the MIPA. The Aggregate Consideration is subject to adjustment in accordance with the MIPA.

In connection with the Purchase, holders of 3,323,707 shares of common stock sold in EON’s initial public offering (the “public shares”) properly exercised their right to have their public shares redeemed (the “Redemption Rights”) for a pro rata portion of the trust account (the “Trust Account”) which held the proceeds from EON’s initial public offering, funds from EON’s payments to extend the time to consummate a business combination and interest earned, calculated as of two business days prior to the Closing, which was approximately $10.95 per share, or $49,362,479 in the aggregate. The remaining balance in the Trust Account (after giving effect to the Redemption Rights) was $12,979,300.

Immediately upon the Closing, Pogo Royalty exercised the OpCo Exchange Right as it relates to 200,000 OpCo Class B units (and 200,000 shares of Class B Common Stock). After giving effect to the Purchase, the redemption of public shares as described above and the exchange mentioned in the preceding sentence, were (i) 5,097,009 shares of Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding, (ii) 1,800,000 shares of Class B Common Stock issued and outstanding and (iii) no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

The Class A Common Stock and EON warrants continue to trade, but now as an operating company, on the NYSE American under the symbols “EONR” and “EONR.WS”.

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Membership Interest Purchase Agreement

On November 15, 2023, Buyer, Seller, and Sponsor entered into the MIPA Amendment, whereby the Parties agreed to extend the outside date for the transaction to November 30, 2023, and to place 500,000 shares of Seller Class B Shares into escrow instead of 500,000 OpCo Class B Units.

Settle Up Letter Agreement

On November 15, 2023, Buyer and Seller entered into the Settle Up Letter Agreement, whereby Seller agreed to accept a minimum amount of cash at Closing less than $33,000,000, provided that, on or before November 21, 2023, Buyer must settle and pay to Seller $1,925,873 from sales proceeds received from oil and gas production attributable to Pogo, including pursuant to its third party contract with affiliates of Chevron.

OpCo A&R LLC Agreement

In connection with the Closing, EON and Pogo Royalty, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, an affiliate of Seller and Seller’s designated recipient of the Aggregate Consideration (“Pogo Royalty”), entered into an amended and restated limited liability company agreement of OpCo (the “OpCo A&R LLC Agreement”). Pursuant to the A&R OpCo LLC Agreement, each OpCo unitholder (excluding EON) will, subject to certain timing procedures and other conditions set forth therein, have the right (the “OpCo Exchange Right”) to exchange all or a portion of its OpCo Class B Units for, at OpCo’s election, (i) shares of Class A Common Stock at an exchange ratio of one share of Class A Common Stock for each OpCo Class B Unit exchanged, subject to conversion rate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends and reclassifications and other similar transactions, or (ii) an equivalent amount of cash. Additionally, the holders of OpCo Class B Units will be required to exchange all of their OpCo Class B Units (a “Mandatory Exchange”) upon the occurrence of the following: (i) upon the direction of EON with the consent of at least fifty percent (50%) of the holders of OpCo Class B Units; or (ii) upon the one-year anniversary of the Mandatory Conversion Trigger Date. In connection with any exchange of OpCo Class B Units pursuant to the OpCo Exchange Right or acquisition of OpCo Class B Units pursuant to a Mandatory Exchange, a corresponding number of shares of Class B Common Stock held by the relevant OpCo unitholder will be cancelled.

The OpCo Preferred Units will be automatically converted into OpCo Class B Units on the two-year anniversary of the issuance date of such OpCo Preferred Units (the “Mandatory Conversion Trigger Date”) at a rate determined by dividing (i) $20.00 per unit (the “Stated Conversion Value”), by (ii) the Market Price of the Class A Common Stock (the “Conversion Price”). The “Market Price” means the simple average of the daily VWAP of the Class A Common Stock during the five (5) trading days prior to the date of conversion. On the Mandatory Conversion Trigger Date, EON will issue a number of shares of Class B Common Stock to Pogo Royalty equivalent to the number of OpCo Class B Units issued to Pogo Royalty. If not exchanged sooner, such newly issued OpCo Class B Units shall automatically exchange into Class A Common Stock on the one-year anniversary of the Mandatory Conversion Trigger Date at a ratio of one OpCo Class B Unit for one share of Class Common Stock. An equivalent number of shares of Class B Common Stock must be surrendered with the OpCo Class B Units to us in exchange for the Class A Common Stock. As noted above, the OpCo Class B Units must be exchanged upon the one-year anniversary of the Mandatory Conversion Trigger Date.

Promissory Note

In connection with the Closing, OpCo issued the Seller Promissory Note to Pogo Royalty in the principal amount of $15,000,000. The Seller Promissory Note provides for a maturity date that is six (6) months from the Closing Date, bears an interest rate equal to 12% per annum, and contains no penalty for prepayment. If the Seller Promissory Note is not repaid in full on or prior to its stated maturity date, OpCo will owe interest from and after default equal to the lesser of 18% per annum and the highest amount permissible under law, compounded monthly. The Seller Promissory Note is subordinated to the Term Loan (as defined herein).

Registration Rights Agreement

In connection with the Closing, EON and Pogo Royalty entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which EON has agreed to provide Pogo Royalty with certain registration rights with respect to the shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the OpCo Exchange Right, including filing with the SEC an initial registration statement on Form S-1 covering the resale by the Pogo Royalty of the shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the OpCo Exchange Right so as to permit their resale under Rule 415 under the Securities Act, no later than thirty (30) days following the Closing, use its commercially reasonable efforts to have the initial registration statement declared effective by the SEC as soon as reasonably practicable following the filing thereof with the SEC, and use commercially reasonable efforts to convert the Form S-1 (and any subsequent registration statement) to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 as promptly as practicable after EON is eligible to use a Form S-3 Shelf.

In certain circumstances, Pogo Royalty can demand our assistance with underwritten offerings, and Pogo Royalty will be entitled to certain piggyback registration rights.

Option Agreement

In connection with the Closing, EON, HNRA Royalties, LLC, a newly formed Delaware limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of EON (“HNRA Royalties”) and Pogo Royalty entered into an Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”). Pogo Royalty owns certain overriding royalty interests in certain oil and gas assets owned by Pogo (the “ORR Interest”). Pursuant to the Option Agreement, Pogo Royalty granted irrevocable and exclusive option to HNRA Royalty to purchase the ORR Interest for the Option Price (as defined below) at any time prior to November 15, 2024. The option is not exercisable while the Seller Promissory Note is outstanding.

The purchase price for the ORR Interest upon exercise of the option is: (i) (1) $30,000,000 the (“Base Option Price”), plus (2) an additional amount equal to interest on the Base Option Price of twelve percent (12%), compounded monthly, from the Closing Date through the date of acquisition of the ORR Interest, minus (ii) any amounts received by Pogo Royalty in respect of the ORR Interest from the month of production in which the effective date of the Option Agreement occurs through the date of the exercise of the option (such aggregate purchase price, the “Option Price”).

The Option Agreement and the option will immediately terminate upon the earlier of (a) Pogo Royalty’s transfer or assignment of all of the ORR Interest in accordance with the Option Agreement and (b) November 15, 2024.

Pursuant to the Option Agreement, upon execution, EON issued to Pogo Royalty 10,000 shares of Class A Common Stock.

Director Nomination and Board Observer Agreement

In connection with the Closing, we entered into Director Nomination and Board Observer Agreement (the “Board Designation Agreement”) with CIC. Pursuant to the Board Designation Agreement, CIC has the right, at any time CIC beneficially owns our capital stock, to appoint two board observers to attend all meetings of our Board of Directors. In addition, after the time of the conversion of the OpCo Preferred Units owned by Pogo Royalty, CIC will have the right to nominate a certain number of members of the board of directors depending on Pogo Royalty’s ownership percentage of Class A Common Stock as further provided in the Board Designation Agreement.

Backstop Agreement

In connection with the Closing, EON entered a Backstop Agreement (the “Backstop Agreement”) with Pogo Royalty and certain of EON’s founders listed therein (the “Founders”) whereby Pogo Royalty will have the right (“Put Right”) to cause the Founders to purchase Pogo Royalty’s OpCo Preferred Units at a purchase price per unit equal to $10.00 per unit plus the product of (i) the number of days elapsed since the effective date of the Backstop Agreement and (ii) $10.00 divided by 730. Seller’s right to exercise the Put Right will survive for six (6) months following the date the Trust Shares (as defined below) are not restricted from transfer under the Letter Agreement (as defined in the MIPA) (the “Lockup Expiration Date”).

As security that the Founders will be able to purchase the OpCo Preferred Units upon exercise of the Put Right, the Founders agreed to place at least 1,300,000 shares of Class A Common Stock into escrow (the “Trust Shares”), which the Founders can sell or borrow against to meet their obligations upon exercise of the Put Right, with the prior consent of Seller. EON is not obligated to purchase the OpCo Preferred Units from Pogo Royalty under the Backstop Agreement. Until the Backstop Agreement is terminated, Pogo Royalty and its affiliates are not permitted to engage in any transaction which is designed to sell short the Class A Common Stock or any other publicly traded securities of EON.

Founder Pledge Agreement

In connection with the Closing, EON entered a Founder Pledge Agreement (the “Founder Pledge Agreement”) with the Founders whereby, in consideration of placing the Trust Shares into escrow and entering into the Backstop Agreement, EON agreed: (a) by January 15, 2024, to issue to the Founders an aggregate number of newly issued shares of Class A Common Stock equal to 10% of the number of Trust Shares; (b) by January 15, 2024, to issue to the Founders number of warrants to purchase an aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock equal to 10% of the number of Trust Shares, which such warrants shall be exercisable for five years from issuance at an exercise price of $11.50 per shares; (c) if the Backstop Agreement is not terminated prior to the Lockup Expiration Date, to issue an aggregate number of newly issued shares of Class A Common Stock equal to (i) (A) the number of Trust Shares,divided by(B) the simple average of the daily VWAP of the Class A Common Stock during the five (5) Trading Days prior to the date of the termination of the Backstop Agreement, subject to a minimum of $6.50 per share,multiplied by(C) a price between $10.00-$13.00 per share (as further described in the Founder Pledge Agreement),minus(ii) the number of Trust Shares; and (d) following the purchase of OpCo Preferred Units by a Founder pursuant to the Put Right, to issue a number of newly issued shares of Class A Common Stock equal to the number of Trust Shares sold by such Founder. Until the Founder Pledge Agreement is terminated, the Founders are not permitted to engage in any transaction which is designed to sell short the Class A Common Stock or any other publicly traded securities of EON.

Purchase, Sale, Termination and Exchange Agreement

On February 10, 2025, the Company entered into a Purchase, Sale, Termination and Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, OpCo, SPAC Subsidiary, HNRA Royalties, Pogo Royalty, CIC, DenCo, Pogo Management, and 4400. The closing of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement (the “Closing”) is subject to the satisfaction of various conditions, including the Company obtaining financing.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company agreed to purchase the ORRI from Pogo Royalty for $14,000,000, payable in cash at the Closing. In addition, at the Closing, Pogo Royalty agreed to waive all outstanding interest accrued under the Seller Note, reduce the outstanding principal amount of the Seller Note to $8,000,000 and settle and discharge the Seller Note in exchange for the payment of $8,000,000 in cash. Pogo Royalty further agreed to assign and transfer the OpCo Preferred Units to OpCo in exchange for the issuance by the Company of 3,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock at the Closing.

As consideration for entering into the Agreement, the Company agreed to release the Escrow Shares to Pogo Royalty and to promptly process any exchange notice delivered by Pogo Royalty to exchange the Escrow Share for shares of Class A Common Stock, and Pogo Royalty agreed to deliver such exchange notice within two days of the date of the Agreement. The Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, indemnification provisions closing conditions, and covenants.

The Closing is contingent upon the occurrence of certain conditions, including (i) the availability of financing to the Company, (ii) the receipt by Pogo Royalty of a consent of First International Bank & Trust to the Agreement and a written termination agreement, executed by the Company and First International Bank & Trust, terminating that certain Subordination Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2023, by and among First International Bank & Trust, the Company and Pogo Royalty, (iii) the receipt by the Company of any required stockholder consents, (iv) the respective representations and warranties of the parties being true and correct, subject to certain materiality exceptions and (v) the performance by the parties in all material respects of their respective obligations under the Agreement.

The Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual consent of the parties thereto or by any one party if the counterparty is in material breach of the Agreement. If the Closing does not occur prior to 1:00 p.m. Central Time on June 3, 2025, the Agreement will automatically terminate. No assurances can be made that the Company will satisfy these conditions or that the Closing will otherwise occur.

Pogo is an exploration and production company that began operations in February 2017. Pogo is based in Dallas, Texas, and a field office in Loco Hills, New Mexico. As of December 31, 2024, our operating focus is the Northwest Shelf of the Permian Basin, with a specific emphasis on oil and gas producing properties located in the Grayburg-Jackson Field in Eddy County, New Mexico. Pogo is the Operator of Record of its oil and gas properties, operating its properties through its wholly owned subsidiary, LH Operating LLC. Pogo completed multiple acquisitions in 2018 and 2019. These acquisitions included multiple producing properties in Lea and Eddy counties, New Mexico. In 2020, after identifying its core development property, Pogo successfully completed a series of divestures of its non-core properties. Then, with one key asset, its Grayburg-Jackson Field in Eddy County, New Mexico, Pogo focused all of its efforts on developing this asset. This has been Pogo’s focus for 2022 and 2023.

Currently, we have 12 employees (5 executive officers where 4 are in Houston and 1 in Lubbock; 7 field staff in Loco Hills). From time to time, on an as needed basis, contract workers handle additional necessary responsibilities.

Pogo owns, manages, and operates, through its wholly owned subsidiary, LH Operating, LLC, 100% working interest in a gross 13,700 acres located on the Northwest Shelf of the prolific oil and gas producing Permian Basin. Pogo benefits from cash flow growth through continued development of its working interest’s ownership, with relatively low capital cost and lease operating expenses. As of December 31, 2024, average net daily production associated with Pogo’s working interests was 811 barrel of oil equivalent (“BOE”) per day consisting of 86% oil and 14% natural gas. Pogo expects to continue to grow its cash flow by production enhancements in its operations on its gross 13,700-acre leasehold. Furthermore, Pogo intends to make additional acquisitions within the Permian Basin, as well as other oil and gas producing regions in the USA, that meet its investment criteria for minimum risk, geologic quality, operator capability, remaining growth potential, cash flow generation and, most importantly, rate of return.

As of December 31, 2024, 100% of Pogo’s gross 13,700 leasehold acres were located in Eddy County, New Mexico, where 100% of the leasehold working interests owned by Pogo consist of state and federal lands. Pogo believes the Permian Basin offers some of the most compelling rates of return for Pogo and significant potential for cash flow growth. As a result of compelling rates of return, development activity in the Permian Basin has outpaced all other onshore U.S. oil and gas basins since the end of 2016. This development activity has driven basin-level production to grow faster than production in the rest of the United States.

Pogo’s working interests entitle it to receive an average of 97% of the net revenue from crude oil and natural gas produced from the oil and gas reservoirs underlying its acreage. Pogo is not under any mandatory obligation to fund drilling and completion costs associated with oil and gas development because 100% of its lease holdings are held by production. As a working interest owner with significant net earnings, Pogo seeks to fully capture all remaining oil and gas reserves underlying its leasehold acres by systematically developing its low risk, predictable, proven reserves by means of adding perforations in previously drilled and completed wells, were applicable, and drilling new wells in a predetermined drilling pattern. Accordingly, Pogo’s development model generates strong margins greater than 60%, at low risk, predictable, production outcomes that requires low overhead and is highly scalable. For the year ended December 31, 2024, Pogo’s lifting cost was about $28.92 per barrel of oil equivalent at a realized price of $77.01 per BOE, excluding the impact of settled commodity derivatives. Pogo is led by a management team with extensive oil and gas engineering, geologic and land expertise, long-standing industry relationships and a history of successfully managing a portfolio of working and leasehold interests, producing crude oil and natural gas assets. Pogo intends to capitalize on its management team’s expertise and relationships to increase production and cash flow in the field.

Pogo Market Conditions

The price that Pogo receives for the oil and natural gas we produce is largely a function of market supply and demand. Because Pogo’s oil and gas revenues are heavily weighted toward oil, Pogo is more significantly impacted by changes in oil prices than by changes in the price of natural gas. World-wide supply in terms of output, especially production from properties within the United States, the production quota set by OPEC, and the strength of the U.S. dollar can adversely impact oil prices.

Historically, commodity prices have been volatile, and Pogo expects the volatility to continue in the future. Factors impacting the future oil supply balance are world-wide demand for oil, as well as the growth in domestic oil production.

Key Producing Region

As of December 31, 2024, all of the Company’s properties were located exclusively within the Northwest Shelf of the Permian Basin. As of December 2023, the Permian Basin had the highest level of drilling activity in the United States with greater than 300 drilling rigs operating. By comparison, The Eagle Ford Shale region located in Southwest-central Texas has less than 60 rigs operating. The Permian Basin includes three major geologic provinces: the Delaware Basin to the west, the Midland Basin to the east and the Central Basin Platform in between. The Northwest Shelf is the western limits of the Delaware Basin, a sub-basin within the Permian Basin complex. The Delaware Basin is identified by an abundant amount of oil-in-place, stacked pay potential across an approximately 3,900-foot hydrocarbon column, attractive well economics, favorable operating environment, well developed network of oilfield service providers, and significant midstream infrastructure in place or actively under construction. One hundred percent (100%) of our working interests are located as of December 31, 2024, on the New Mexico side of the Delaware Basin. According to the USGS, the Delaware Basin contains the largest recoverable reserves among all unconventional basins in the United States.

We believe the stacked-play potential of the Delaware Basin combined with favorable drilling economics support continued production growth as Pogo develops its leasehold position and improve well-spacing and completion techniques. Relative to other basins in the continental United States, Pogo believes the Delaware Basin is in a mid-stage of well development and that per-well returns will improve as Pogo continues to employ enhanced oil recovery technologies on its leasehold acreage. Pogo believes these enhanced oil recoveries will continue to support development activity where it holds significant working interest, with predictable returns leading to increasing cash flows with low maintenance costs.

Working Interests in Grayburg-Jackson Field

As of December 31, 2024, the Company owns a 100% working interest in 13,700 gross acres located in Eddy County, New Mexico, with a 74% weighted average net revenue. The 13,700 gross acres are strategically located in the prolific oil field, Grayburg-Jackson field. Working interests granted to the Lessee (Pogo) under an Oil and Gas Lease are real property interests that grant ownership of the crude oil and natural gas underlying a specific tract of land and the rights to explore for, drill for and produce crude oil and natural gas on that land or to lease those exploration and development rights to a third party. Those rights to explore for, drill for and produce crude oil and natural gas on that land have a set period of time for the working interest owner to exercise those rights. Typically, an Oil and Gas Lease can be automatically extended beyond the initial lease term with continuous drilling, production or other operating activities or through negotiated contractual lease extension options. Only when production and drilling cease, the lease terminates.

As of December 31, 2024, 100% of the Company’s working interests are held by production (“HBP”) meaning that Pogo is not under time sensitive obligation to drill or work-over any wells on its 13,700 acres. As of December 31, 2023, 100% of the wells and leases are operated by Pogo. Pogo is the official Operator of record with the state and federal regulatory agencies. As of December 31, 2024, the Company generates a substantial majority of its revenues and cash flows from its working interests when crude oil and natural gas are produced and sold from its acreage.

Currently, Pogo’s working interests reside entirely in the Northwest Shelf of the Permian Basin, which Pogo believes is one of the premier crude oil and natural gas producing regions in the United States. As of December 31, 2024, Pogo’s working interests covered 13,700 gross acres, with the royalty owners retaining a weighted average 26% royalty. The following table summarizes Pogo’s working interest’s position in the lands comprising its leasehold as of December 31, 2024.

As of December 31, 2024, Pogo has working interests in 342 shallow (above 4,000 ft), vertical wells producing oil and gas in paying quantities. Ninety-five of the 342 producing wells were completed between 2019 and June 2022 by Pogo. In 2019, Pogo initiated a 4-well pilot water injection project into the Seven Rivers (“7R”) oil reservoir underlying its 13,700-acre leasehold. After an evaluation period extending into early 2020, Pogo determined the pilot project was successful by producing oil in paying quantities by simply adding perforations in the 7R reservoir in previously drilled and completed wells. Following the successful completion of the 4-well pilot project, Pogo commenced a work-over program by adding perforations in the 7R reservoir in 91 previously drilled wells between 2019 and June 2022. Prior to initiating the 4-well pilot project the legacy wells were averaging 275 BOE/d. By December 2023, the total production increased to 1,022 BOE/d. Pogo’s management team has determined, and verified by Haas and Cobb Petroleum Consultants, LLC (“Cobb ”), that 115 proved well patterns, developed but non-producing, are scheduled to be brought into production between 2024 and 2027.

As of December 31, 2024, the estimated proved crude oil and natural gas reserves attributable to Pogo’s interests in its underlying acreage were 14,492 MBOE (97% oil and 3% natural gas), based on a reserve report prepared by Cobb , worldwide petroleum consultants. Of these reserves, approximately 28% were classified as proved developed producing (“PDP”) reserves, 42% were classified as proved developed non-producing (“PDNP”) reserves and 30% were classified as proved undeveloped (“PUD”) reserves. PUD reserves included in these estimates relate solely to wells that are not yet drilled nor were not yet producing in paying quantities as of December 31, 2024. Estimated proved reserves included in this section is presented on an actual basis, without giving pro forma effect to transactions completed after such dates.

Pogo believes its production and discretionary cash flows will grow significantly as Pogo completes its substantial PDNP inventory of 7R well patterns located on its gross 13,700 acreage. As of December 31, 2024, Pogo had production from 342 vertical wells, and it has identified 127 additional PDNP well patterns based on its assessment of current geological, engineering and land data. As of December 31, 2024, Pogo has identified 43 PUD well patterns based on its assessment of current geological, engineering and land data

Pogo’s working interest development strategy anticipates shifting any drilling activity associated with its PUD reserves following Pogo’s completion of its PDNP reserves. The work-over costs attributable to adding perforations in wells previously drilled and completed is significantly less than drilling new wells. As of December 31, 2024, Pogo’s leasehold position has 25.7 wells per square mile. Pogo expects to see increases in its production, revenue and discretionary cash flows from the development of 115 well patterns in the 7R reservoir. Pogo believes its current leasehold working interests provide the potential for significant long-term organic revenue growth as Pogo develops its PDNP reserves to increase crude oil and natural gas production.

Business Strategies

The Company’s primary business objective is to generate discretionary cash flow by maintaining its strong cash flow from the PDP reserves and increasing cash flow by developing predictable, low cost PDNP reserves in its Permian Basin asset. The Company intends to accomplish this objective by executing the following strategies:

Generate strong cash flow supported by means of disciplined development of its PDNP Reserves. As the sole working interest owner, the Company benefits from the continued organic development of its acreage in the Permian Basin. As of December 31, 2024, EON, in conjunction with Cobb, a third-party engineering consulting firm, has confirmed that EON has 127, low cost, well patterns to be developed during 2025 to 2028. The total costs to complete these 127 well patterns have been predetermined by historical analysis. The estimated cost to complete each PDNP pattern is $339,252 and the estimated cost to complete each PUD pattern is $1,187,698. A single well pattern consists of one each producing well with its corresponding or dedicated water injection wells, with each injection well situated on four sides of the producing well. Water injection wells are necessary to maintain reservoir pressure in its original state and to move the oil in place toward the producing well. Pressure maintenance helps ensure maximum oil and gas recovery. Without pressure maintenance, oil recoveries from a producing oil reservoir generally do not exceed 10% of the original oil in place (“OOIP”). With pressure maintenance by re-injecting produced water into the oil reservoir, then Pogo expects to see ultimate oil recoveries 25% or greater of the OOIP. Offsetting oil wells on its leasehold also take advantage of the water injected into the oil reservoir, and is able to convert a high percentage of its revenue to discretionary cash flow. Because Pogo owns 100% working interests it incurs 100% of the monthly leasehold operating costs for the production of crude oil and natural gas or capital costs for the drilling and completion of wells on its acreage. Because these wells are shallow oil producers, with vertical depths between 1500 ft and 4000 ft, the monthly operating expenses are relatively low.

***Focus primarily on the Permian Basin.***All of the Company’s working interests are currently located in the Permian Basin, one of the most prolific oil and gas basins in the United States. Pogo believes the Permian Basin provides an attractive combination of highly-economic and oil-weighted geologic and reservoir properties, opportunities for development with significant inventory of drilling locations and zones to be delineated our top-tier management team.

**Maintain conservative and flexible capital structure to support the Company’s business and facilitate long-term operations.**The Company is committed to maintaining a conservative capital structure that will afford it the financial flexibility to execute its business strategies on an ongoing basis. Pogo believes that internally generated cash flows from its working interests and operations, available borrowing capacity under its revolving credit facility, and access to capital markets will provide it with sufficient liquidity and financial flexibility to continue to acquire attractive targets with high working interests that will position it to grow its cash flows in order to distributed to its shareholders as dividends and/or reinvested to further expand its base of cash flow generating assets. Pogo intends to maintain a conservative leverage profile and utilize a mix of cash flows from operations and issuance of debt and equity securities to finance future acquisitions.

Competitive Strengths

The Company believes that the following competitive strengths will allow it to successfully execute its business strategies and achieve its primary business objective:

Crude Oil and Natural Gas Data

In this report, we include estimates of reserves associated with the assets located in New Mexico as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Such reserve estimates are based on evaluations prepared by the independent petroleum engineering firm of Cobb, in accordance with Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers and definitions and guidelines established by the SEC. The December 31, 2024 and 2023 reserve reports include the total interests of Pogo Resources, LLC, including the 10% overriding royalty interest not acquired in the Purchase, and the reserve report as of December 31, 2024 is included in this filing. As such, the estimates of proved oil and gas and discounted future net cash flows include the total interests of Pogo Resources, LLC.

Cobb is an independent consulting firm founded in 1983. Its compensation is not contingent on the results obtained or reported. Frank J. Marek, a Registered Texas Professional Engineer and a senior technical advisor of Cobb, is primarily responsible for overseeing the preparation of the reserve report. His professional qualifications meet or exceed the qualifications of reserve estimators set forth in the “Standards Pertaining to Estimation and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information” promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers. His qualifications include: Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University 1977; member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers; member of the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers; and 40 years of experience in estimating and evaluating reserve information and estimating and evaluating reserves; he is proficient in judiciously applying industry standard practices to engineering and geoscience evaluations as well as applying SEC and other industry reserve definitions and guidelines.

Preparation of Reserve Estimates

Our reserve estimates as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 included in this report is included are based on evaluations prepared by the independent petroleum engineering firm of Cobb Petroleum Consultants, LLC in accordance with Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers and definitions and guidelines established by the SEC. The December 31, 2024 and 2023 reserve reports include the total interests of Pogo Resources, LLC, including the 10% overriding royalty interest not acquired in the Purchase, and the reserve report as of December 31, 2024 is included in this filing. As such, the estimates of proved oil and gas and discounted future net cash flows include the total interests of Pogo Resources, LLC.

We selected Cobb as its independent reserve engineer for its historical experience and geographic expertise in engineering similar resources.

In accordance with rules and regulations of the SEC applicable to companies involved in crude oil and natural gas producing activities, proved reserves are those quantities of crude oil and natural gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations. The term “reasonable certainty” means deterministically, the quantities of crude oil and/or natural gas are much more likely to be achieved than not, and probabilistically, there should be at least a 90% probability of recovering volumes equal to or exceeding the estimate. All of our proved reserves were estimated using a deterministic method. The estimation of reserves involves two distinct determinations. The first determination results in the estimation of the quantities of recoverable crude oil and natural gas and the second determination results in the estimation of the uncertainty associated with those estimated quantities in accordance with the definitions established under SEC rules. The process of estimating the quantities of recoverable reserves relies on the use of certain generally accepted analytical procedures. These analytical procedures fall into four broad categories or methods: (i) production performance-based methods, (ii) material balance-based methods; (iii) volumetric-based methods and (iv) analogy. These methods may be used singularly or in combination by the reserve evaluator in the process of estimating the quantities of reserves. Reserves for proved developed producing wells were estimated using production performance methods. Non-producing reserve estimates, for developed and undeveloped properties, were forecast using a pattern simulation model.

To estimate economically recoverable proved reserves and related future net cash flows, EON considered many factors and assumptions, including the use of reservoir parameters derived from geological and engineering data that cannot be measured directly, economic criteria based on current costs and the SEC pricing requirements and forecasts of future production rates.

Under SEC rules, reasonable certainty can be established using techniques that have been proven effective by actual production from projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir or by other evidence using reliable technology that establishes reasonable certainty. Reliable technology is a grouping of one or more technologies (including computational methods) that have been field tested and have been demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an analogous formation. To establish reasonable certainty with respect to EON’s estimated proved reserves, the technologies and economic data used in the estimation of its proved reserves have been demonstrated to yield results with consistency and repeatability, and include production and well test data, downhole completion information, geologic data, electrical logs, radioactivity logs, core data, and historical well cost and operating expense data.

Internal Controls

Our internal staff of petroleum engineers and geoscience professionals work closely with its independent reserve engineer to ensure the integrity, accuracy and timeliness of data furnished to such independent reserve engineer in their preparation of reserve estimates. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation. As a result, the estimates of different engineers often vary. In addition, the results of drilling, testing and production may justify revisions of such estimates. Accordingly, reserve estimates often differ from the quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered. See “Risk Factors Related to Our Business” appearing elsewhere in this report. Our engineering group is responsible for the internal review of reserve estimates.

No portion of EON’s engineering group’s compensation is directly dependent on the quantity of reserves booked. The engineering group reviews the estimates with the third-party petroleum consultant, Cobb , an independent petroleum engineering firm.

Reconciliation of Standardized Measure to PV-10

Neither PV-10 nor PV-10 after ARO are financial measures defined under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”); therefore, the following table reconciles these amounts to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, which is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Management believes that the non-GAAP financial measures of PV-10 and PV-10 after ARO are relevant and useful for evaluating the relative monetary significance of oil and natural gas properties. PV-10 and PV-10 after ARO are used internally when assessing the potential return on investment related to oil and natural gas properties and in evaluating acquisition opportunities. Management believes that the presentation of PV-10 and PV-10 after ARO provide useful information to investors because they are widely used by professional analysts and sophisticated investors in evaluating oil and natural gas companies. PV-10 and PV-10 after ARO are not measures of financial or operating performance under GAAP, nor are they intended to represent the current market value of our estimated oil and natural gas reserves. PV-10 after ARO is equivalent to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows as defined under GAAP. Investors should not assume that PV-10, or PV-10 after ARO, of our proved oil and natural gas reserves shown above represent a current market value of our estimated oil and natural gas reserves.

The reconciliation of PV-10 and PV-10 after ARO to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to our estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves is as follows (in thousands):

Summary of Reserves

The following table presents EON’s estimated proved reserves as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. The reserve report include the total interests of Pogo Resources, LLC, including the 10% overriding royalty interest not acquired in the Purchase, and the December 31, 2024 reserve report is included in this filing as an exhibit. As such, the estimates of proved oil and gas and discounted future net cash flows include the total interests of Pogo Resources, LLC. The reserve estimates presented in the table below are based on reports prepared by Cobb, EON’s independent petroleum engineers, which reports were prepared in accordance with current SEC rules and regulations regarding oil and natural gas reserve reporting:

Reserve engineering is a process of estimating volumes of economically recoverable crude oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation. As a result, the estimates of different engineers often vary. In addition, the results of drilling, testing, and production may justify revisions of such estimates. Accordingly, reserve estimates often differ from the quantities of crude oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered. Estimates of economically recoverable crude oil and natural gas and of future net revenues are based on a number of variables and assumptions, all of which may vary from actual results, including geologic interpretation, prices, and future production rates and costs. Please read “Risk Factors Related to Our Business.”

PUDs

As of December 31, 2024, EON estimated its PUD reserves to be 4,215 MBbls of crude oil and 784 MMcf of natural gas for a total of 4,346 MBOE. As of December 31, 2023, EON estimated its PUD reserves to be 4,137 MBbls of crude oil and 850 MMcf of natural gas for a total of 4,279 MBOE. PUDs will be converted from undeveloped to developed as the applicable wells begin production.

The following table summarizes EON’s changes in PUD reserves during the year ended December 31, 2023 (in MBOE):

The following table summarizes EON’s changes in PUD reserves during the year ended December 31, 2024 (in MBOE):

Changes in EON’s PUD reserves that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were primarily due to increased operating costs.

EON has not made any capital expenditures in order to convert its existing PUDs because EON has been allocating its capital resources to convert PDNP reserves to PDP reserves and not to convert its PUD reserves to PDNP or PDP reserves.

EON’s PUD reserves at December 31, 2024 and 2023 are based on a development plan instituted by our management. All of such reserves are scheduled to be developed within five years from the date such locations were initially disclosed as PUD reserves. Our development plan is prepared annually by management and approved by the Board of Directors. Our PUD reserves only represent reserves that are scheduled, based on such plan, to be developed within five years from the date such locations were initially disclosed as PUDs. At December 31, 2024, we estimate that our future development costs relating to the development of PUD reserves are $0 in 2025, $15.7 million in 2026, $46.1 million in 2027 and $32.3 million in 2028. Under our development plan, our existing PUDs are expected to be converted to PDP reserves by 2028.

Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production Prices and Costs

Production and Price History

The following table sets forth information regarding net production of crude oil and natural gas and certain price and cost information for each of the periods indicated:

Productive Wells

Productive wells located on our leasehold consist of producing vertical wells that are capable of producing oil and gas in paying quantities and are not dry wells. As of December 31, 2024, we owned working interests in 342 producing wells, 207 water injectors, and one water source well, all located on its 13,700 gross acre leasehold. Only one well owned by the Company is approved to be plugged and abandoned.

Pogo is not aware of any dry holes drilled on the acreage underlying its working interest during the relevant periods.

The following table sets forth the total number of gross and net productive wells, all of which are oil wells.

Drilling and other exploration and development activities

For the years ended 2024 and 2023, we did not drill any new wells.

As of December 31, 2024, there were no wells being completed or waiting on completion. Furthermore, we were not installing any waterfloods or pressure maintenance systems or engaging in any other development activity as of such date.

Acreage and Ownership

The following figures sets forth information relating to our acreage for its working interests as of December 31, 2024:

We own 100% working interests that is subject to a 26% weighted average net royalty interest across its 13,700 gross acres as of December 31, 2024. For information regarding the impact of lease expirations on our interests, please see “Risks Related to Our Business.” All of our 13,700 acres are held by production and or not under any mandatory lease expiration.

Pogo’s leasehold is 100% operated through its wholly owned subsidiary LH Operating and 100% of its 13,700 gross acre leasehold is HBP. The leasehold is comprised of 23 total leases, 20 BLM and 3 NM State leases. Ninety-seven percent of its leasehold classified as PDP has title opinion coverage. For regulatory purposes, the current producing reservoirs, 7R, Queen, Grayburg, and San Andres, are considered a single, unitized pool (“pool”) for all current PDP reserves and PDNP reserves. No regulatory approval is required prior to performing workovers on existing wells within the pool (i.e., perforations, fracking, or acidizing, etc.).

LH Operating, LLC was created to solely manage this asset on behalf of Pogo. LH Operating has performed its duties for two (2) years without any known liabilities, and are in good standing with regulatory agencies. LH Operating is fully bonded to operate in New Mexico.

Leasehold acreage

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the total developed and undeveloped acreage in which we owned an interest as of December 31, 2024.

All leasehold acreage of Pogo is considered to be “Developed Acres” because completed producing wells or wells capable of producing in economic quantities are located throughout the entirety of the acreage such that the acreage allocated to such wells for production on a spacing, allocated, unitized or pooled basis comprise the entire 13,700 acres leased by Pogo. The interests of Pogo in the oil, gas and other minerals in “Developed Acres” are, or may be, composed of one or multiple stratigraphic zones producing or capable of producing oil and gas in economic quantities.

The leasehold of Pogo has undergone development activities, including drilling, completion, and production operations in the Grayburg/San Andres zones (“legacy zones”) and/or the Seven Rivers waterflood zones. As a result, there are no remaining leasehold portions that require initial development. Pogo has identified new potential proved undeveloped reserves within the incremental waterflood zone of the Seven Rivers. Pogo intends to develop and produce the Seven Rivers zone comprised of approximately 1,677 acres underlying a portion of the Developed Acres including, without limitation, infield drilling or perforation and recompletion of existing wells.

Regulation

The following disclosure describes regulations directly associated with E&P companies who are classified with state and federal regulatory agencies as Operator of record of crude oil and natural gas properties, including Pogo.

Crude oil and natural gas operations are subject to various types of legislation, regulation and other legal requirements enacted by governmental authorities. This legislation and regulation affecting the crude oil and natural gas industry is under constant review for amendment or expansion. Some of these requirements carry substantial penalties for failure to comply. The regulatory burden on the crude oil and natural gas industry increases the cost of doing business.

Environmental Matters

Crude oil and natural gas exploration, development and production operations are subject to stringent laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to protection of the environment or occupational health and safety. These laws and regulations have the potential to impact production on the properties in which Pogo owns working interest, which could materially adversely affect its business and its prospects. Numerous federal, state and local governmental agencies, such as the EPA, issue regulations that often require difficult and costly compliance measures that carry substantial administrative, civil and criminal penalties and may result in injunctive obligations for non-compliance. These laws and regulations may require the acquisition of a permit before drilling commences, restrict the types, quantities and concentrations of various substances that can be released into the environment in connection with drilling and production activities, limit or prohibit construction or drilling activities on certain lands lying within wilderness, wetlands, ecologically sensitive and other protected areas, require action to prevent or remediate pollution from current or former operations, such as plugging abandoned wells or closing earthen pits, result in the suspension or revocation of necessary permits, licenses and authorizations, require that additional pollution controls be installed and impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from operations. The strict, joint and several liability nature of such laws and regulations could impose liability upon the Operator of record regardless of fault. Moreover, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances, hydrocarbons or other waste products into the environment. Changes in environmental laws and regulations occur frequently, and any changes that result in more stringent and costly pollution control or waste handling, storage, transport, disposal or cleanup requirements could materially adversely affect our business and prospects.

Non-Hazardous and Hazardous Waste

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), and comparable state statutes and regulations promulgated thereunder, affect crude oil and natural gas exploration, development, and production activities by imposing requirements regarding the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, disposal and cleanup of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes. With federal approval, the individual states administer some or all of the provisions of RCRA, sometimes in conjunction with their own, more stringent requirements. Administrative, civil and criminal penalties can be imposed for failure to comply with waste handling requirements. Although most wastes associated with the exploration, development and production of crude oil and natural gas are exempt from regulation as hazardous wastes under RCRA, these wastes typically constitute nonhazardous solid wastes that are subject to less stringent requirements. From time to time, the EPA and state regulatory agencies have considered the adoption of stricter disposal standards for nonhazardous wastes, including crude oil and natural gas wastes. Moreover, it is possible that some wastes generated in connection with exploration and production of oil and gas that are currently classified as nonhazardous may, in the future, be designated as “hazardous wastes,” resulting in the wastes being subject to more rigorous and costly management and disposal requirements. On May 4, 2016, a coalition of environmental groups filed a lawsuit against EPA in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia for failing to update its RCRA Subtitle D criteria regulations governing the disposal of certain crude oil and natural gas drilling wastes. In December 2016, EPA and the environmental groups entered into a consent decree to address EPA’s alleged failure. In response to the consent decree, in April 2019, the EPA signed a determination that revision of the regulations is not necessary at this time. However, any changes in the laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Operator of record (Pogo) of its properties’ capital expenditures and operating expenses, which in turn could affect production from the acreage underlying our working interests and adversely affect our business and prospects.

Remediation

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and analogous state laws generally impose strict, joint and several liability, without regard to fault or legality of the original conduct, on classes of persons who are considered to be responsible for the release of a “hazardous substance” into the environment. These persons include the current owner or operator of a contaminated facility, a former owner or operator of the facility at the time of contamination, and those persons that disposed or arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substance at the facility. Under CERCLA and comparable state statutes, persons deemed “responsible parties” may be subject to strict, joint and several liability for the costs of removing or remediating previously disposed wastes (including wastes disposed of or released by prior owners or operators) or property contamination (including groundwater contamination), for damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies. In addition, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment. In addition, the risk of accidental spills or releases could expose Pogo’s working interests underlying its leasehold acreage to significant liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on the operators’ businesses, financial condition and results of operations. Liability for any contamination under these laws could require us to make significant expenditures to investigate and remediate such contamination or attain and maintain compliance with such laws and may otherwise have a material adverse effect on their results of operations, competitive position or financial condition.

Water Discharges

The Clean Water Act (“CWA”), the SDWA, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”), and analogous state laws and regulations promulgated thereunder impose restrictions and strict controls regarding the unauthorized discharge of pollutants, including produced waters and other crude oil and natural gas wastes, into regulated waters. The definition of regulated waters has been the subject of significant controversy in recent years. The EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers published a revised definition on January 18, 2023, which has been challenged in court. To the extent any future rule expands the scope of jurisdiction, it may impose greater compliance costs or operational requirements on Pogo.as the Operator of record. The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a permit issued by the EPA or the state. The CWA and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit the discharge of dredge and fill material into regulated waters, including jurisdictional wetlands, unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit. In addition, spill prevention, control and countermeasure plan requirements under federal law require appropriate containment berms and similar structures to help prevent the contamination of navigable waters in the event of a petroleum hydrocarbon tank spill, rupture or leak. Production EPA has also adopted regulations requiring certain crude oil and natural gas facilities to obtain individual permits or coverage under general permits for storm water discharges, and in June 2016, the EPA finalized effluent limitation guidelines for the discharge of wastewater from hydraulic fracturing.

The OPA is the primary federal law for crude oil spill liability. The OPA contains numerous requirements relating to the prevention of and response to petroleum releases into regulated waters, including the requirement that operators of offshore facilities and certain onshore facilities near or crossing waterways must develop and maintain facility response contingency plans and maintain certain significant levels of financial assurance to cover potential environmental cleanup and restoration costs. The OPA subject’s owners of facilities to strict, joint and several liability for all containment and cleanup costs and certain other damages arising from a release, including, but not limited to, the costs of responding to a release of crude oil into surface waters.

Noncompliance with the CWA, the SDWA, or the OPA may result in substantial administrative, civil and criminal penalties, as well as injunctive obligations, for the Operator of record (Pogo) underlying its leasehold working interest.

Air Emissions

The CAA, and comparable state laws and regulations, regulate emissions of various air pollutants through the issuance of permits and the imposition of other requirements. The EPA has developed, and continues to develop, stringent regulations governing emissions of air pollutants at specified sources. New facilities may be required to obtain permits before work can begin, and existing facilities may be required to obtain additional permits and incur capital costs in order to remain in compliance. For example, in June 2016, the EPA established criteria for aggregating multiple small surface sites into a single source for air quality permitting purposes, which could cause small facilities, on an aggregate basis, to be deemed a major source subject to more stringent air permitting processes and requirements. These laws and regulations may increase the costs of compliance for crude oil and natural gas producers and impact production of the acreage underlying Pogo’s working interests. In addition, federal and state regulatory agencies can impose administrative, civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance with air permits or other requirements of the federal CAA and associated state laws and regulations. Moreover, obtaining or renewing permits has the potential to delay the development of crude oil and natural gas projects.

Climate Change

Climate change continues to attract considerable public and scientific attention. As a result, numerous proposals have been made and are likely to continue to be made at the international, national, regional and state levels of government to monitor and limit emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other GHGs. These efforts have included consideration of cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes, GHG reporting and tracking programs and regulations that directly limit GHG emissions from certain sources.

In the United States, no comprehensive climate change legislation has been implemented at the federal level. However, President Biden has highlighted addressing climate change as a priority of his administration and has issued several executive orders addressing climate change. Moreover, following the U.S. Supreme Court finding that GHG emissions constitute a pollutant under the CAA, the EPA has adopted regulations that, among other things, establish construction and operating permit reviews for GHG emissions from certain large stationary sources, require the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from certain petroleum and natural gas system sources in the United States, and together with the DOT, implementing GHG emissions limits on vehicles manufactured for operation in the United States. The regulation of methane from oil and gas facilities has been subject to uncertainty in recent years. In September 2020, the Trump Administration revised regulations initially promulgated in June 2016 to rescind certain methane standards and remove the transmission and storage segments from the source category for certain regulations. However, subsequently, the U.S. Congress approved, and President Biden signed into law, a resolution under the Congressional Review Act to repeal the September 2020 revisions to the methane standards, effectively reinstating the prior standards. Additionally, in November 2021, the EPA issued a proposed rule that, if finalized, would establish new source and first-time existing source standards of performance for methane and volatile organic compound emissions for oil and gas facilities. Operators of affected facilities will have to comply with specific standards of performance to include leak detection using optical gas imaging and subsequent repair requirement, and reduction of emissions by 95% through capture and control systems. The EPA issued supplemental rules regarding methane emissions on December 6, 2022. The IRA established the Methane Emissions Reduction Program, which imposes a charge on methane emissions from certain petroleum and natural gas facilities, which may apply to our operations in the future and may require us to expend material sums. We cannot predict the scope of any final methane regulatory requirements or the cost to comply with such requirements. However, given the long-term trend toward increasing regulation, future federal GHG regulations of the oil and gas industry remain a significant possibility.

Separately, various states and groups of states have adopted or are considering adopting legislation, regulation or other regulatory initiatives that are focused on such areas as GHG cap and trade programs, carbon taxes, reporting and tracking programs, and restriction of emissions. For example, New Mexico has adopted regulations to restrict the venting or flaring of methane from both upstream and midstream operations. At the international level, the United Nations-sponsored “Paris Agreement” requires member states to submit non-binding, individually-determined reduction goals known as Nationally Determined Contributions every five years after 2020. President Biden has recommitted the United States to the Paris Agreement and, in April 2021, announced a goal of reducing the United States’ emissions by 50-52% below 2005 levels by 2030. Additionally, at COP26 in Glasgow in November 2021, the United States and the European Union jointly announced the launch of a Global Methane Pledge, an initiative committing to a collective goal of reducing global methane emissions by at least 30 percent from 2020 levels by 2030, including “all feasible reductions” in the energy sector. The full impact of these actions cannot be predicted at this time.

Governmental, scientific, and public concern over the threat of climate change arising from GHG emissions has resulted in increasing political risks in the United States, including climate change related pledges made by certain candidates now in public office.

There are also increasing financial risks for fossil fuel producers as shareholders currently invested in fossil-fuel energy companies may elect in the future to shift some or all of their investments into non-fossil fuel related sectors. Institutional lenders who provide financing to fossil fuel energy companies also have become more attentive to sustainable lending practices and some of them may elect not to provide funding for fossil fuel energy companies. For example, at COP26, GFANZ announced that commitments from over 450 firms across 45 countries had resulted in over $130 trillion in capital committed to net zero goals. The various sub-alliances of GFANZ generally require participants to set short-term, sector-specific targets to transition their financing, investing, and/or underwriting activities to net zero emissions by 2050. There is also a risk that financial institutions will be required to adopt policies that have the effect of reducing the funding provided to the fossil fuel sector. In late 2021, the Federal Reserve announced that it had joined the Network for Greening the Financial System, a consortium of financial regulators focused on addressing climate-related risks in the financial sector. Subsequently, in November 2021, the Federal Reserve issued a statement in support of the efforts of the Network for Greening the Financial System to identify key issues and potential solutions for the climate-related challenges most relevant to central banks and supervisory authorities. Limitation of investments in and financing for fossil fuel energy companies could result in the restriction, delay or cancellation of drilling programs or development or production activities. Additionally, the SEC announced its intention to promulgate rules requiring climate disclosures. Although the form and substance of these requirements is not yet known, this may result in additional costs to comply with any such disclosure requirements.

The adoption and implementation of new or more stringent international, federal or state legislation, regulations or other regulatory initiatives that impose more stringent standards for GHG emissions from the oil and natural gas sector or otherwise restrict the areas in which this sector may produce oil and natural gas or generate the GHG emissions could result in increased costs of compliance or costs of consuming, and thereby reduce demand for oil and natural gas, which could reduce the profitability of Pogo’s working interests. Additionally, political, litigation and financial risks may result in Pogo restricting or cancelling production activities, incurring liability for infrastructure damages as a result of climatic changes, or impairing their ability to continue to operate in an economic manner, which also could reduce the profitability of Pogo’s working interests. One or more of these developments could have a material adverse effect on Pogo’s business, financial condition and results of operation.

Climate change may also result in various physical risks, such as the increased frequency or intensity of extreme weather events or changes in meteorological and hydrological patterns, that could adversely impact our operations and Pogo’s supply chains. Such physical risks may result in damage to Pogo’s facilities or otherwise adversely impact our operations, such as if they become subject to water use curtailments in response to drought, or demand for their products, such as to the extent warmer winters reduce the demand for energy for heating purposes. Extreme weather conditions can interfere with production and increase costs and damage resulting from extreme weather may not be fully insured. However, at this time, Pogo is unable to determine the extent to which climate change may lead to increased storm or weather hazards affecting its business.

Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing

Hydraulic fracturing is an important and common practice that is used to stimulate production of hydrocarbons from tight formations. The process involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure into formations to fracture the surrounding rock and stimulate production. Hydraulic fracturing operations have historically been overseen by state regulators as part of their crude oil and natural gas regulatory programs.

However, several agencies have asserted regulatory authority over certain aspects of the process. For example, in August 2012, the EPA finalized regulations under the federal CAA that establish new air emission controls for crude oil and natural gas production and natural gas processing operations. Federal regulation of methane emissions from the oil and gas sector has been subject to substantial controversy in recent years.

In addition, governments have studied the environmental aspects of hydraulic fracturing practices. These studies, depending on their degree of pursuit and whether any meaningful results are obtained, could spur initiatives to further regulate hydraulic fracturing under the SDWA or other regulatory authorities. For example, in December 2016, the EPA issued its final report on a study it had conducted over several years regarding the effects of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water sources. The final report, concluded that “water cycle” activities associated with hydraulic fracturing may impact drinking water under certain limited circumstances.

Several states have adopted, or are considering adopting, regulations that could restrict or prohibit hydraulic fracturing in certain circumstances and/or require the disclosure of the composition of hydraulic fracturing fluids. For example, the Railroad Commission of Texas has previously issued a “well integrity rule,” which updates the requirements for drilling, putting pipe down, and cementing wells. The rule also includes new testing and reporting requirements, such as: (i) the requirement to submit cementing reports after well completion or after cessation of drilling, whichever is later; and (ii) the imposition of additional testing on wells less than 1,000 feet below usable groundwater. The well integrity rule took effect in January 2014. Local governments also may seek to adopt ordinances within their jurisdictions regulating the time, place and manner of drilling activities in general or hydraulic fracturing activities in particular or prohibit the performance of well drilling in general or hydraulic fracturing in particular.

State and federal regulatory agencies recently have focused on a possible connection between the hydraulic fracturing related activities, particularly the disposal of produced water in underground injection wells, and the increased occurrence of seismic activity. When caused by human activity, such events are called induced seismicity. In some instances, operators of injection wells in the vicinity of seismic events have been ordered to reduce injection volumes or suspend operations. Some state regulatory agencies, including those in Colorado, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas, have modified their regulations to account for induced seismicity. For example, in October 2014, the Railroad Commission published a new rule governing permitting or re-permitting of disposal wells that would require, among other things, the submission of information on seismic events occurring within a specified radius of the disposal well location, as well as logs, geologic cross sections and structure maps relating to the disposal area in question. If the permittee or an applicant of a disposal well permit fails to demonstrate that the produced water or other fluids are confined to the disposal zone or if scientific data indicates such a disposal well is likely to be or determined to be contributing to seismic activity, then the agency may deny, modify, suspend or terminate the permit application or existing operating permit for that well. The Railroad Commission of Texas has used this authority to deny permits for waste disposal wells. In some instances, regulators may also order that disposal wells be shut in. In late 2021, the Railroad Commission of Texas issued a notice to operators of disposal wells in the Midland area, to reduce saltwater disposal well actions and provide certain data to the commission. Separately, in November 2021, New Mexico implemented protocols requiring operators to take various actions within a specified proximity of certain seismic activity, including a requirement to limit injection rates if a seismic event is of a certain magnitude. As a result of these developments, Pogo as the Operator of record may be required to curtail operations or adjust development plans, which may adversely impact Pogo’s business.

The USGS has identified six states with the most significant hazards from induced seismicity, including New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas. In addition, a number of lawsuits have been filed, most recently in Oklahoma, alleging that disposal well operations have caused damage to neighboring properties or otherwise violated state and federal rules regulating waste disposal. These developments could result in additional regulation and restrictions on the use of injection wells and hydraulic fracturing. Such regulations and restrictions could cause delays and impose additional costs and restrictions on Pogo’s properties and on their waste disposal activities.

If new laws or regulations that significantly restrict hydraulic fracturing and related activities are adopted, such laws could make it more difficult or costly to perform fracturing to stimulate production from tight formations. In addition, if hydraulic fracturing is further regulated at the federal or state level, fracturing activities could become subject to additional permitting and financial assurance requirements, more stringent construction specifications, increased monitoring, reporting and recordkeeping obligations, plugging and abandonment requirements and also to attendant permitting delays and potential increases in costs. Such legislative changes could cause Pogo to incur substantial compliance costs, and compliance or the consequences of any failure to comply could have a material adverse effect on Pogo’s financial condition and results of operations. At this time, it is not possible to estimate the impact on Pogo’s business of newly enacted or potential federal or state legislation governing hydraulic fracturing.

Endangered Species Act

The ESA restricts activities that may affect endangered and threatened species or their habitats. The designation of previously unidentified endangered or threatened species could cause E&P operators to incur additional costs or become subject to operating delays, restrictions or bans in the affected areas. Recently, there have been renewed calls to review protections currently in place for the dunes sagebrush lizard, whose habitat includes parts of the Permian Basin, and to reconsider listing the species under the ESA. For example, in October 2019 environmental groups filed a lawsuit against the FWS seeking to compel the agency to list the species under the ESA, and in July 2020, FWS agreed to initiate a 12-month review to determine whether listing the species was warranted, which determination remains outstanding. Additionally, in June 2021, the FWS proposed to list two distinct population sections of the Lesser Prairie Chicken, including one in portions of the Permian Basin, under the ESA, which was finalized on November 25, 2022. To the extent species are listed under the ESA or similar state laws, or previously unprotected species are designated as threatened or endangered in areas where Pogo’s properties are located, operations on those properties could incur increased costs arising from species protection measures and face delays or limitations with respect to production activities thereon.

Employee Health and Safety

Operations on Pogo’s properties are subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, including the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”) and comparable state statutes, whose purpose is to protect the health and safety of workers. In addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard, the EPA community right-to-know regulations under Title III of the federal Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act, and comparable state statutes require that information be maintained concerning hazardous materials used or produced in operations and that this information be provided to employees, state and local government authorities and citizens.

Other Regulation of the Crude Oil and Natural Gas Industry

The crude oil and natural gas industry is extensively regulated by numerous federal, state and local authorities. Legislation affecting the crude oil and natural gas industry is under constant review for amendment or expansion, frequently increasing the regulatory burden. Also, numerous departments and agencies, both federal and state, are authorized by statute to issue rules and regulations that are binding on the crude oil and natural gas industry and its individual members, some of which carry substantial penalties for failure to comply. Although the regulatory burden on the crude oil and natural gas industry increases the cost of doing business, these burdens generally do not affect us any differently or to any greater or lesser extent than they affect other companies in the industry with similar types, quantities and locations of production.

The availability, terms and conditions and cost of transportation significantly affect sales of crude oil and natural gas. The interstate transportation of crude oil and natural gas and the sale for resale of natural gas is subject to federal regulation, including regulation of the terms, conditions and rates for interstate transportation, storage and various other matters, primarily by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). Federal and state regulations govern the price and terms for access to crude oil and natural gas pipeline transportation. FERC’s regulations for interstate crude oil and natural gas transmission in some circumstances may also affect the intrastate transportation of crude oil and natural gas.

Pogo cannot predict whether new legislation to regulate crude oil and natural gas might be proposed, what proposals, if any, might actually be enacted by the U.S. Congress or the various state legislatures, and what effect, if any, the proposals might have on its operations. Sales of crude oil and condensate are not currently regulated and are made at market prices.

Drilling and Production

The operations on Pogo’s properties are subject to various types of regulation at the federal, state and local level. These types of regulation include requiring permits for the drilling of wells, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations. The state, and some counties and municipalities, in which Pogo operates also regulate one or more of the following:

State laws regulate the size and shape of drilling and spacing units or proration units governing the pooling of crude oil and natural gas properties. Some states allow forced pooling or integration of tracts to facilitate exploration while other states rely on voluntary pooling of lands and leases. In some instances, forced pooling or unitization may be implemented by third parties and may reduce Pogo’s interest in the unitized properties. In addition, state conservation laws establish maximum rates of production from crude oil and natural gas wells, generally prohibit the venting or flaring of natural gas and impose requirements regarding the ratability of production. These laws and regulations may limit the amount of crude oil and natural gas that the Pogo’s properties can produce from Pogo’s wells or limit the number of wells or the locations at which can be drill. Moreover, each state generally imposes a production or severance tax with respect to the production and sale of crude oil and natural gas within its jurisdiction. States do not regulate wellhead prices or engage in other similar direct regulation, but Pogo cannot assure you that they will not do so in the future. The effect of such future regulations may be to limit the amounts of crude oil and natural gas that may be produced from our wells, negatively affect the economics of production from these wells or to limit the number of locations operators can drill.

Federal, state and local regulations provide detailed requirements for the abandonment of wells, closure or decommissioning of production facilities and pipelines and for site restoration in areas where Pogo operates. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and many other state and local authorities also have regulations for plugging and abandonment, decommissioning and site restoration. Although the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers does not require bonds or other financial assurances, some state agencies and municipalities do have such requirements.

Natural Gas Sales and Transportation

FERC has jurisdiction over the transportation and sale for resale of natural gas in interstate commerce by natural gas companies under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (“NGA”) and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978. Since 1978, various federal laws have been enacted which have resulted in the complete removal of all price and non-price controls for sales of domestic natural gas sold in “first sales.”

Under the Energy Policy Act of 2005, FERC has substantial enforcement authority to prohibit the manipulation of natural gas markets and enforce its rules and orders, including the ability to assess substantial civil penalties. FERC also regulates interstate natural gas transportation rates and service conditions and establishes the terms under which Pogo’s properties may use interstate natural gas pipeline capacity, as well as the revenues received for release of natural gas pipeline capacity. Interstate pipeline companies are required to provide nondiscriminatory transportation services to producers, marketers and other shippers, regardless of whether such shippers are affiliated with an interstate pipeline company. FERC’s initiatives have led to the development of a competitive, open access market for natural gas purchases and sales that permits all purchasers of natural gas to buy gas directly from third-party sellers other than pipelines.

Gathering service, which occurs upstream of jurisdictional transmission services, is regulated by the states onshore and in state waters. Section 1(b) of the NGA exempts natural gas gathering facilities from regulation by FERC under the NGA. FERC has in the past reclassified certain jurisdictional transmission facilities as non-jurisdictional gathering facilities, which may increase the operators’ costs of transporting gas to point-of-sale locations. This may, in turn, affect the costs of marketing natural gas that Pogo’s properties produce.

Historically, the natural gas industry was more heavily regulated; therefore, we cannot guarantee that the regulatory approach currently pursued by FERC and the U.S. Congress will continue indefinitely into the future nor can we determine what effect, if any, future regulatory changes might have on its natural gas related activities.

Crude Oil Sales and Transportation

Crude oil sales are affected by the availability, terms and cost of transportation. The transportation of crude oil in common carrier pipelines is also subject to rate regulation. FERC regulates interstate crude oil pipeline transportation rates under the Interstate Commerce Act and intrastate crude oil pipeline transportation rates are subject to regulation by state regulatory commissions. The basis for intrastate crude oil pipeline regulation, and the degree of regulatory oversight and scrutiny given to intrastate crude oil pipeline rates, varies from state to state. Insofar as effective interstate and intrastate rates are equally applicable to all comparable shippers, we believe that the regulation of crude oil transportation rates will not affect its operations in any materially different way than such regulation will affect the operations of its competitors.

Further, interstate and intrastate common carrier crude oil pipelines must provide service on a non-discriminatory basis. Under this open access standard, common carriers must offer service to all similarly situated shippers requesting service on the same terms and under the same rates. When crude oil pipelines operate at full capacity, access is governed by pro-rationing provisions set forth in the pipelines’ published tariffs. Accordingly, Pogo believes that access to crude oil pipeline transportation services of Pogo’s properties will not materially differ from our competitors’ access to crude oil pipeline transportation services.

State Regulation

New Mexico regulates the drilling for, and the production, gathering and sale of, crude oil and natural gas, including imposing severance taxes and requirements for obtaining drilling permits. New Mexico currently imposes a 3.75% severance tax on the market value of crude oil and natural gas production as well as other production taxes for conservation, schools, ad valorem, and equipment. Combined, these taxes amount to 8-9% tax on market value of crude and natural gas production. States also regulate the method of developing new fields, the spacing and operation of wells and the prevention of waste of crude oil and natural gas resources.

States may regulate rates of production and may establish maximum daily production allowables from crude oil and natural gas wells based on market demand or resource conservation, or both. States do not regulate wellhead prices or engage in other similar direct economic regulation, but Pogo cannot assure you that they will not do so in the future. Should direct economic regulation or regulation of wellhead prices by the states increase, this could limit the amount of crude oil and natural gas that may be produced from wells on Pogo’s properties and the number of wells or locations Pogo’s properties can drill.

The petroleum industry is also subject to compliance with various other federal, state and local regulations and laws. Some of those laws relate to resource conservation and equal employment opportunity. Pogo does not believe that compliance with these laws will have a material adverse effect on its business.

Title to Properties

Prior to completing an acquisition of a target or working interests, Pogo performs a title review on each tract to be acquired. Pogo’s title review is meant to confirm the working interests owned by a prospective seller, the property’s lease status and royalty amount as well as encumbrances or other related burdens. As a result, title examinations have been obtained on substantially all of Pogo’s properties.

In addition to Pogo’s initial title work, Pogo often will conduct a thorough title examination prior to leasing any new acres, and/or drilling a well. Should any further title work uncover any further title defects, Pogo will perform curative work with respect to such defects. Pogo generally will not commence drilling operations on a property until any material title defects on such property have been cured.

Pogo believes that the title to its assets is satisfactory in all material respects. Although title to these properties is in some cases subject to encumbrances, such as customary royalty interest generally retained in connection with the acquisition of crude oil and gas interests, non-participating royalty interests and other burdens, easements, restrictions or minor encumbrances customary in the crude oil and natural gas industry, Pogo believes that none of these encumbrances will materially detract from the value of these properties or from its interest in these properties.

Competition

The crude oil and natural gas business is highly competitive; we primarily competes with companies for the acquisition of targets with high percentage of working interests underlying crude oil and natural gas leases. Many of our competitors not only own and acquire working interests but also explore for and produce crude oil and natural gas and, in some cases, carry on midstream and refining operations and market petroleum and other products on a regional, national or worldwide basis. By engaging in such other activities, our competitors may be able to develop or obtain information that is superior to the information that is available to us. In addition, certain of our competitors may possess financial or other resources substantially larger than Pogo possesses. Our ability to acquire additional working interests and properties and to discover reserves in the future will be dependent upon its ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment.

In addition, crude oil and natural gas products compete with other forms of energy available to customers, primarily based on price. These alternate forms of energy include electricity, coal, and fuel oils. Changes in the availability or price of crude oil and natural gas or other forms of energy, as well as business conditions, conservation, legislation, regulations, and the ability to convert to alternate fuels and other forms of energy may affect the demand for crude oil and natural gas.

Seasonality of Business

Weather conditions affect the demand for, and prices of, natural gas and can also delay drilling activities, disrupting Pour overall business plans. Additionally, Pogo’s properties are located in areas adversely affected by seasonal weather conditions, primarily in the winter and spring. During periods of heavy snow, ice or rain, Pogo may be unable to move their equipment between locations, thereby reducing its ability to operate Pogo’s wells, reducing the amount of crude oil and natural gas produced from the wells on Pogo’s properties during such times. Additionally, extended drought conditions in the areas in which Pogo’s properties are located could impact its ability to source sufficient water or increase the cost for such water. Furthermore, demand for natural gas is typically higher during the winter, resulting in higher natural gas prices for Pogo’s natural gas production during its first and fourth quarters. Certain natural gas users utilize natural gas storage facilities and purchase some of their anticipated winter requirements during the summer, which can lessen seasonal demand fluctuations. Seasonal weather conditions can limit drilling and producing activities and other crude oil and natural gas operations in Pogo’s operating areas. Due to these seasonal fluctuations, our results of operations for individual quarterly periods may not be indicative of the results that it may realize on an annual basis.

Employees and Human Working Capital

We have salaried and regular pay employees in the field as well as management at our corporate offices. As of December 31, 2024, we employed 7 full-time salaried and regular pay field individuals under no ongoing employment contracts who provided direct support to Pogo’s operations. As of December 31, 2024, we employed 5 full-time salaried employees at our corporate offices, 5 of which have ongoing employment contracts. None of these employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements.

Human capital management is critical to our ongoing business success, which requires investing in our people. Our aim is to create a highly engaged and motivated workforce where employees are inspired by leadership, engaged in purpose-driven, meaningful work and have opportunities for growth and development. We are an equal opportunity employer and we are fundamentally committed to creating and maintaining a work environment in which employees are treated with respect and dignity. All human resources policies, practices and actions related to hiring, promotion, compensation, benefits and termination are administered in accordance with the principles of equal employment opportunity and other legitimate criteria without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender expression or identity, ethnicity, national origin, ancestry, age, mental or physical disability, genetic information, any veteran status, any military status or application for military service, or membership in any other category protected under applicable laws.

An effective approach to human capital management requires that we invest in talent, development, culture and employee engagement. We aim to create an environment where our employees are encouraged to make positive contributions and fulfill their potential.

Our Board of Directors is also actively involved in reviewing and approving executive compensation, selections and succession plans so that we have leadership in place with the requisite skills and experience to deliver results the right way.

Emerging Growth Company

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. As such, we are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the prices of our securities may be more volatile.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We intend to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. Accordingly, the information we provide to you may be different than you might get from other public companies in which you hold securities.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the closing of our Initial Public Offering, or December 31, 2027, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion, (iii) the last day of the fiscal year in which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which would occur if the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeded $700.0 million as of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter of such year or (iv) the date on which we have issued more than $1.00 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period.

Facilities

We currently maintain our executive offices at 3730 Kirby Drive, Suite 1200, Houston, Texas 77098. We recently leased a space at 10810 Old Katy Rd, Katy, TX 77494 just beyond the Houston city limits for our engineering and geological center. The cost for the two spaces combined is approximately $3,000 per month. We consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.