Skip to main content

Verde Clean Fuels Inc

For the period ended Dec 31, 2023. Filed Mar 28, 2024.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2023 · Filed Mar 28, 2024

VGAS$1.00+0.3%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits

ITEM 1. Business

Overview

Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Verde,” “Verde Clean Fuels” and “Company”) is a development-stage clean energy technology company specializing in the conversion of synthesis gas, or syngas, derived from diverse feedstocks, such as biomass or natural gas (including renewable natural gas) and other feedstocks, into liquid hydrocarbons, primarily gasoline, through an innovative and proprietary liquid fuels technology, the STG+® process. Through Verde Clean Fuels’ STG+® process, Verde Clean Fuels converts syngas into reformulated blend-stock for oxygenate blending (“RBOB”) gasoline. Verde Clean Fuels is focused on the development of technology and commercial facilities aimed at turning waste and other feedstocks into a usable stream of syngas which is then transformed into a single finished fuel, such as gasoline, without any additional refining steps. The availability of biogenic feedstocks and the economic and environmental drivers that divert these materials from landfills will enable us to utilize these waste streams to produce renewable gasoline from modular production facilities.

We are redefining liquid fuels technology through our proprietary and innovative STG+® process to deliver scalable and cost-effective gasoline from renewable feedstocks or flared natural gas. We acquired our STG+® technology from Primus Green Energy (“Primus”), a company established in 2007 that developed the patented STG+® technology to convert syngas into gasoline or methanol. Since acquiring the technology, we have adapted the application of our STG+® technology to focus on the renewable energy industry. This adaptation requires a third-party gasification system to produce acceptable synthesis gas from renewable feedstocks. Our proprietary STG+® system converts the syngas into gasoline.

Over $110 million has been invested in our technology, including our demonstration facility in New Jersey, which has completed over 10,500 hours of operation producing gasoline or methanol. Our demonstration facility represents the scalable nature of our operational modular commercial design which has fully integrated reactors and recycle lines and is designed with key variables, like gas velocity and catalyst bed length, at a 1-to-1 scale with our commercial design. We have also participated in carbon lifecycle studies to validate the scoring of carbon intensity, which we define as the quantity of greenhouse gas emissions associated with producing, distributing, and consuming a fuel, per unit of fuel energy (“CI”) and reduced lifecycle emissions (the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production, distribution, and consumption of a fuel) of our renewable gasoline as well as fuel, blending and engine testing to validate the specification and performance of our gasoline product. Our carbon intensity score is based on an analysis styled after the Department of Energy’s Greenhouse gases Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies (“GREET”) life cycle analysis. We believe our renewable gasoline, when paired with carbon capture and sequestration, exhibits a significant lifecycle carbon emissions reduction compared to traditional petroleum-based gasoline. As a result, we believe our gasoline produced from renewable feedstock, such as biomass, will qualify under the federal renewable fuel standard (“RFS”) program for the D3 renewable identification number (“RIN”), which could have significant value. Similarly, gasoline produced from our process may also qualify for various state carbon programs, including California’s low carbon fuel standard (“LCFS”). Unlike many other gas-to-liquids technologies, not only can our STG+® process produce renewable gasoline from syngas, but we expect it will be able to be applied at other production facilities to produce other end products including methanol. In addition to our initial focus on the production of renewable gasoline, we believe that there is opportunity to continue to develop additional process technology to produce middle distillates including lower-carbon diesel and aviation fuel. As with other government programs, the use requirements of the RFS program and other similar state-level programs are subject to change, which could materially harm our ability to operate profitably. As of December 31, 2023, the Company is still in the process of developing its first commercial production facility and has not derived revenue from its principal business activities. The Company is managed as an integrated business and consequently, there is only one reportable segment.

“Clean” or “lower-carbon” as used in relation to the Company’s products refers the lower CI, lower lifecycle emissions, and lower quantity of greenhouse gas emissions resulting directly from fuel combustion, relative to conventional gasoline derived from petroleum. “Renewable” as used in relation to the Company’s products refers to energy or fuel derived from biomass feedstock.

Our Growth Strategy

We intend to grow our business by leveraging our competitive advantages in the design and implementation of small-scale modular facilities that can be situated in proximity to renewable feedstock or natural gas sources. We believe we have a number of avenues to achieve our growth objectives:

Construction and Development of Commercial Production Facilities

A critical step in our success will be the successful construction and operation of the first commercial production facility using our STG+® technology. In April 2022, we commenced a pre-front-end engineering and design (“FEED”) study for our first commercial production facility in Maricopa, Arizona. While we have not abandoned a potential project in Maricopa, Arizona, we have refocused on projects that we believe have quicker paths to commercial operations. We believe our commercialization activities are being completed at a pace that can support first commercial production of renewable gasoline as early as 2026.

Concurrent with the Business Combination, Diamondback Energy, Inc (“Diamondback”) through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Cottonmouth Ventures LLC (“Cottonmouth Ventures”), made a $20 million equity investment in Verde and entered into an equity participation right agreement pursuant to which Verde must grant Cottonmouth Ventures the right to participate and jointly develop facilities in the Permian Basin utilizing Verde’s STG+® technology for the production of gasoline derived from economically disadvantaged natural gas feedstocks. Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas company headquartered in Midland, Texas, focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas. The production of gasoline from natural gas sourced from the Permian Basin is designed to allow Diamondback to mitigate the flaring of natural gas while also producing a high-margin product from natural gas streams that are subject to being price disadvantaged compared to other natural gas basins.

On February 6, 2024, Verde and Cottonmouth Ventures entered into a joint development agreement (“JDA”) for the proposed development, construction, and operation of a facility to produce commodity-grade gasoline using natural gas feedstock supplied from Diamondback’s operations in the Permian Basin. The JDA provides a pathway forward for the parties to reach final definitive documents and final investment decision (“FID”). The JDA frames the contracts contemplated to be entered into between the parties, including an operating agreement, ground lease agreement, construction agreement, license agreement and financing agreements as well as conditions precedent to close such as FID. We expect that the proposed facility, which is to be located in Martin County, Texas in the heart of the Permian Basin, could serve as a template for additional natural gas-to-gasoline projects throughout the Permian Basin and other pipeline-constrained basins in the U.S., as well as addressing flared or stranded natural gas opportunities internationally.

We plan to grow our business by building and operating a portfolio of commercial production facilities. Currently, we have three additional production facilities planned with additional potential production facility development opportunities in early-stage due diligence. We have identified opportunities to produce gasoline from natural gas in other pipeline-constrained production areas as well as opportunities to produce renewable gasoline from biomass in locations with access to suitable feedstock, carbon sequestration, and markets. We believe the number of identified and planned potential production facilities bode well for our potential growth.

On August 1, 2023, we announced a carbon dioxide management agreement (“CDMA”) with Carbon TerraVault JV HoldCo, LLC (“CTV JV”), a carbon management partnership focused on carbon capture and sequestration development formed between Carbon TerraVault, a subsidiary of California Resources Corporation (“CRC”), and Brookfield Renewable. Under the terms of the non-binding agreement, the Company would construct a new renewable gasoline production facility at CRC’s existing Net Zero Industrial Park in Kern County, California, to capture carbon dioxide and produce renewable gasoline from biomass and other agricultural waste feedstock to help support the further decarbonization of California’s economy and its transportation sector. It is anticipated that the project could produce up to 7 million gallons per year of renewable gasoline for use as transportation fuel. Project FID is targeted for mid-2025, with operations expected to begin in the second half of 2027.

Expansion of Commercial Operations and Customer Base

We believe there are growth opportunities utilizing our technology for the production of gasoline derived from existing locations with economically disadvantaged natural gas, flared natural gas and stranded natural gas feedstocks. We also plan to achieve growth through the expansion of our in-process projects as the facilities are expanded or otherwise begin to produce renewable gasoline. We also intend to license our technology in places where we do not anticipate deploying our own capital. Additionally, we intend to expand internationally to regions interested in our STG+® process, like the European Union and United Kingdom, and may enter relationships with other businesses to expand our operations and to create service networks to support our production and delivery of renewable gasoline.

Establishing and Maintaining Relationships with Key Strategic Partners

We have established, maintained and managed strategic relationships with certain key strategic partners, including Cottonmouth Ventures, CarbonTerraVault, California Resources Corporation, and InEnTec Inc., who have the resources to promote mutually beneficial business relationships and grow our business. To expand our business, we plan to continue to identify and evaluate development and partnership opportunities and other suitable and scalable business relationships.

Other Important Relationships

We are in the process of selecting the contractor for the FEED work for our Permian Basin project. The selected contractor is also expected to perform engineering, procurement, and construction (“EPC”) services once the project has achieved FID. The selected contractor will be an important strategic relationship for Verde to support the strategy of engineering a system once and building many with minimal changes.

Koch Modular Process Systems, LLC (“KMPS”) is an important EPC subcontractor and provides technical information to IHI and/or its subcontractors for FEED execution.

Developing and Advancing Technology

Just as we refocused the use and application of our STG+® technology from using natural gas as a feedstock to using renewable biomass and other feedstocks, our research and development (“R&D”) team is continuously researching and developing ways to improve our technology and meet our customers’ energy needs. Using our innovative technology platform and intellectual property portfolio, we are well-positioned to continue making technology advancements over time. Additionally, we intend to develop or acquire additional intellectual property, such as processes for lower-carbon diesel and aviation fuel, as well as other complementary technologies.

Formation, Business Combination and Related Transactions

On February 15, 2023 (the “Closing Date”), we consummated (“Closing”) the Business Combination pursuant to that certain business combination agreement, dated as of August 12, 2022 (“Business Combination Agreement”) by and among CENAQ Energy Corp. (“CENAQ”), a Delaware Corporation, Verde Clean Fuels OpCo, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of CENAQ (“OpCo”), Bluescape Clean Fuels Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Holdings”), Bluescape Clean Fuels Intermediate Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings (“Intermediate”), and CENAQ Sponsor LLC (“Sponsor”). Immediately upon the completion of the Business Combination, CENAQ was renamed Verde Clean Fuels, Inc.

Pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement: (i) CENAQ filed a fourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the “Fourth A&R Charter”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware reflecting the name change to “Verde Clean Fuels, Inc.” and increasing the number of authorized shares of Verde Clean Fuels’ capital stock, par value $0.0001 per share, to 376,000,000 shares, consisting of (A) 350,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Class A Common Stock”), (B) 25,000,000 shares of Class C common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Class C Common Stock” and, together with the Class A Common Stock, the “Common Stock”), and (C) 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share; (ii) (A) CENAQ contributed to OpCo (1) all of its assets (excluding its interests in OpCo and the aggregate amount of cash required to satisfy any exercise by CENAQ stockholders of their Redemption Rights (as defined below)) and (2) 22,500,000 newly issued shares of Class C Common Stock (such shares, the “Holdings Class C Shares”) and (B) in exchange therefor, OpCo issued to CENAQ a number of Class A common units of OpCo (the “Class A OpCo Units”) equal to the number of total shares of Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately after the consummation of the transactions (the “Transactions”) contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement (such transactions, the “SPAC Contribution”); and (iii) immediately following the SPAC Contribution, (A) Holdings contributed to OpCo 100% of the issued and outstanding limited liability company interests of Intermediate and (B) in exchange therefor, OpCo transferred to Holdings (1) 22,500,000 Class C common units of OpCo (the “Class C OpCo Units” and, together with the Class A OpCo Units, the “OpCo Units”) and (2) the Holdings Class C Shares. Additionally, the following transactions occurred in connection with the Business Combination:

●The issuance and sale of 3,200,000 shares of Class A Common Stock for a purchase price of $10.00 per share (Holdings purchased 800,000 of these shares of Class A Common Stock), for an aggregate purchase price of $32,000,000, in a private placement (“PIPE Financing”);
●An aggregate of $158.8 million was paid from the CENAQ trust account to holders of 15,403,880 shares of Class A Common Stock that exercised their redemption rights (“Redemption Rights”) and the balance of $19,031,516 of proceeds from CENAQ’s trust account related to non-redeeming holders of 1,846,120 shares of Class A Common Stock were released from trust and delivered to Verde Clean Fuels as part of the Business Combination;
●We repaid $3,750,000 of capital contributions made by Holdings and paid $10,043,793 of transaction expenses including deferred underwriting fees of $1,700,000;
●Holdings received earnout consideration (“Holdings earnout”) of 3,500,000 shares of Class C common stock and a corresponding number of Class C OpCo Units subject to vesting that will result in the issuance as follows: (i) one-half of the Holdings earnout shares will vest when the volume-weighted average share price (“VWAP”) of the Class A Common Stock is greater than or equal to $15.00 for any 20 trading days within any period of 30 consecutive trading days within five years of the Closing Date and (ii) the second half will vest when the VWAP of the Class A Common Stock is greater than or equal to $18.00 over the same measurement period (vesting will be deemed to occur in the event of a sale of Verde Clean Fuels at a price that is equal to or greater than the applicable triggering VWAP price);
●The Sponsor received earnout consideration (“Sponsor earnout”) of 3,234,375 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to forfeiture which will no longer be subject to forfeiture as follows: (i) one-half of the Sponsor earnout will no longer be subject to forfeiture if the VWAP of Class A Common Stock is greater than or equal to $15.00 for any 20 trading days within any period of 30 consecutive trading days within five years of the Closing Date and (ii) the second half will no longer be subject to forfeiture when the VWAP of the Class A Common Stock is greater than or equal to $18.00 over the same measurement period (forfeiture to be deemed of no further force and effect in the event of a sale of Verde Clean Fuels at a price that is equal to or greater than the applicable triggering VWAP price);
●The forfeiture by underwriters of 189,750 shares of Class A Common Stock; and
●The issuance of 253,125 and 825,000 shares of Class A Common Stock to the Sponsor and certain other investors in CENAQ’s initial public offering upon conversion of Class B common stock of CENAQ.

Total proceeds raised from the Business Combination were $37,329,178 consisting of $32,000,000 in PIPE Financing proceeds, $19,031,516 from the CENAQ trust, and $91,454 from the CENAQ operating account offset by $10,043,793 in transaction expenses which were recorded as a reduction to additional paid in capital, and offset by a $3,750,000 capital repayment to Holdings. As of the consummation of the Business Combination, there were (i) 31,858,620 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding, comprised of 9,358,620 shares of Class A Common Stock and 22,500,000 shares of Class C common stock and (ii) 2,475,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of 2,475,000 private placement warrants originally issued by CENAQ (“Private Placement Warrants”) and 12,937,479 shares of our Class A Common Stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of our 12,937,479 public warrants issued in the CENAQ initial public offering (“Public Warrants” and, together with the Private Placement Warrants, the “Warrants”). Each of the Warrants is currently exercisable to purchase one share of Class A Common Stock at $11.50 per share on or prior to February 15, 2028, except for 29,216 Public Warrants that were exercised for cash of $335,984 in connection with the issuance of 29,216 shares of Class A Common Stock during fiscal 2023.

Prior to the Business Combination, Verde Clean Fuels, previously CENAQ, was a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”) incorporated for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses.

Pursuant to ASC 805 – Business Combinations (“ASC 805”), the Business Combination was accounted for as a common control reverse recapitalization where Intermediate was deemed the accounting acquirer and Verde Clean Fuels was treated as the accounting acquiree, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Business Combination was not treated as a change in control of Intermediate. This determination reflects Holdings holding a majority of the voting power of Verde Clean Fuels, Intermediate’s pre-Business Combination operations being the majority post-Business Combination operations of Verde Clean Fuels, and Intermediate’s management team retaining similar roles at Verde Clean Fuels. Further, Holdings continues to have control of the Board of Directors through its majority voting rights. Under ASC 805, the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of Intermediate are recognized at their carrying amounts on the date of the Business Combination.

Following the completion of the Business Combination, the combined company is organized in an “Up-C” structure and the only direct assets of Verde Clean Fuels consists of equity interests in OpCo, whose only direct assets consists of equity interests in Intermediate. The up-C structure allows Holdings to retain its equity ownership through Opco, an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, in the form of Class C Opco Units, and provides potential future tax benefits for Verde Clean Fuels when the holders of Class C Opco Units ultimately exchange their Class C Opco Units and shares of the Company’s Class C Common Stock for shares of Class A Common Stock in Verde Clean Fuels. We are the sole managing member of Opco. As such, we consolidate Opco, and the unitholders that hold economic interests directly in Opco are presented as redeemable noncontrolling interests in our financial statements.

Holders of Class C Opco Units, other than Verde Clean Fuels, have the right (a “redemption right”), subject to certain limitations, to exchange all or a portion of its Class C Opco Units and a corresponding number of shares of Class C Common Stock for, at Opco’s election, (i) shares of Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like, or (ii) an equivalent amount of cash.

On the Closing Date, in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, Verde Clean Fuels entered into a tax receivable agreement (the “Tax Receivable Agreement”) with Holdings (together with its permitted transferees, the “TRA Holders,” and each a “TRA Holder”). Pursuant to the Tax Receivable Agreement, Verde Clean Fuels is required to pay each TRA Holder 85% of the amount of net cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income and franchise tax that Verde Clean Fuels actually realizes (computed using certain simplifying assumptions) or is deemed to realize in certain circumstances in periods after the Closing Date as a result of, as applicable to each such TRA Holder, (i) certain increases in tax basis that occur as a result of Verde Clean Fuels’ acquisition (or deemed acquisition for U.S. federal income tax purposes) of all or a portion of such TRA Holder’s Class C OpCo Units pursuant to the exercise of the OpCo exchange right, a mandatory exchange or the call right (collectively referred to as “Exchange Right, a Mandatory Exchange or the Call Right”) and (ii) imputed interest deemed to be paid by Verde Clean Fuels as a result of, and additional tax basis arising from, any payments Verde Clean Fuels makes under the Tax Receivable Agreement. Verde Clean Fuels will retain the benefit of the remaining 15% of these net cash savings. The Tax Receivable Agreement contains a payment cap of $50,000,000, which applies only to certain payments required to be made in connection with the occurrence of a change of control. The payment cap would not be reduced or offset by any amounts previously paid under the Tax Receivable Agreement or any amounts that are required to be paid (but have not yet been paid) for the year in which the change of control occurs or any prior years.

Our Facilities

We own a demonstration facility in Hillsborough, New Jersey and lease office space in Hillsborough, New Jersey and Houston, Texas.

Our Intellectual Property and Technology

As of December 31, 2023, Intermediate had been issued 28 patents globally, including 8 patents in the U.S., and had 3 pending patent applications globally. These patents, filed across 14 jurisdictions, including the U.S., protect key aspects of our technology, including the STG+® process, our proprietary method for converting syngas into gasoline. We believe our intellectual property rights are important assets for our success, providing a significant competitive advantage, and we aggressively protect these rights to maintain our competitive advantage in the market. Our U.S. patents expire on dates ranging from 2032 through 2039. We regularly review our development efforts to assess the existence and patentability of new technology and inventions, and we are prepared to file additional patent applications when we determine it would benefit our business to do so.

We own or have adequate rights to use the intellectual property associated with the STG+® technology. Approximately 17 patents or patent applications in our patent portfolio support and protect our ability to produce commodity-grade gasoline from syngas, 14 patents or patent applications relate to the specific fuel composition produced by our proprietary systems and certain claims of our patents relate potential future enhancements to our technology. We manage our patent portfolio to maximize the lifecycle of protecting our intellectual property and various components and aspects of our system are protected by patents that will expire at staggered times.

Market Opportunity

Demand for Renewable Gasoline and Lower-Carbon Natural Gas

Energy markets are undergoing dramatic changes as they shift from fossil fuels to carbon-reduced and carbon-free sources. A series of technological, economic, regulatory, social and investor pressures are leading the drive to decarbonize energy and sectors that are major energy consumers, such as transportation.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (the “EIA”) “2022 Annual Energy Outlook” and “U.S. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2020,” gasoline accounts for more than 20% of the U.S.’s energy-related carbon dioxide (“CO2”) emissions and overall, transportation represents approximately 37% of total U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions (or 1,903 million tons of CO2). Within the 37% of total U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions caused by the transportation sector, in 2019, gasoline accounted for approximately 56% of the total (or 1,086 million tons of CO2) and accounted for over twice the emissions of diesel (which produced approximately 468 million tons of CO2) and over four times the emissions of aviation fuel (which produced approximately 261 million tons of CO2). Uptake on competing emissions-reduction technologies, such as electric vehicles, is growing, but, according to BloombergNEF, is only expected to reach 24% of the projected 2035 total vehicle fleet in the U.S. As a result, the EIA predicts 2035 gasoline demand to be at 92-102% of 2022 levels. According to the EIA’s “2022 Annual Energy Outlook,” petroleum and natural gas are projected to remain as the most-consumed source of energy in the U.S. through 2050, and motor gasoline is projected to be the most commonly used transportation fuel despite electric vehicles gaining market share.

Production of renewable gasoline paired with carbon capture and sequestration results in a fuel that has a negative carbon intensity score, meaning that more carbon is sequestered in the production of a gallon of fuel than is emitted by the consumption of that same quantity of fuel.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, there are approximately 241 million tons per year of waste forest resources and 318 million tons per year of agricultural waste generated annually in the U.S. Using Verde’s STG+® process to produce gasoline from biomass, waste from forest and agricultural sources could produce over 25 billion gallons of gasoline per year. Achieving production of 25 billion gallons of renewable gasoline could meet approximately 19% of the EIA’s estimated 2022 gasoline demand of 132 billion gallons. Renewable gasoline can be utilized within the existing 268 million internal combustion engine (“ICE”) vehicles in the U.S. without vehicle modification. We believe that our renewable gasoline will be able to utilize essentially all of the existing fossil fuel gasoline distribution and retailing infrastructure, including existing gas stations, making our renewable gasoline a drop-in solution that does not require a change in consumer behavior.

Based on the Fuel Institute’s “Life Cycle Analysis Comparison, 2022,” a single conventional ICE vehicle is accountable for approximately 66 tons of CO2 over a 200,000-mile life, which includes 5 tons of CO2 generated from the manufacturing process, 12 tons of CO2 generated from the production and processing of the oil and gasoline fuel used in the vehicle and 48 tons of CO2 generated from vehicle emissions. We estimate that an ICE vehicle utilizing renewable gasoline produced using our STG+® process with carbon sequestration would be accountable for approximately negative 81 tons of CO2 over a 200,000-mile life, which includes five tons of CO2 generated from the manufacturing process, negative 134 tons of CO2 from the production of the renewable gasoline fuel used in the vehicle and 48 tons of CO2 generated from vehicle emissions. As a result, we estimate that an ICE vehicle running solely on renewable gasoline produced using our STG+® process with carbon sequestration would account for over 200% less CO2 emissions over its lifecycle than the same vehicle running on traditional hydrocarbon-based gasoline.

Competition

Our traditional competitors in the renewable fuel market include companies in the incumbent petroleum-based industry, as well as those in the emerging renewable fuels industry and others selling carbon credits as a commodity. Our direct competitors are limited. There are only two other companies of which we are aware that also have their own technology to convert syngas into renewable gasoline: ExxonMobil Corporation (“Exxon”) and Topsoe (“Topsoe”). Although Exxon’s chemistry process is similar to ours, Exxon has historically focused on larger scale projects and markets. Topsoe, although it also focuses on larger scale projects, only licenses its technology and processes to others and does not produce renewable liquid hydrocarbons. We expect other market participants to emerge as competitors in the future.

We believe our technology, scale, and development capabilities are the competitive strengths that differentiate us from our competition. Utilizing biomass through a gasifier to produce syngas, our proprietary STG+® process can efficiently and economically convert syngas to gasoline. We plan to design our facilities to use modular construction and to operate at a scale that makes the use of renewable feedstocks viable. We believe that when using biomass as a feedstock, our ability to design facilities on a smaller scale gives us a competitive advantage, because we are able to deploy equipment to the feedstock rather than being required to build a large central facility. Our analysis suggests that the economies of scale that may benefit a larger facility are lost with the increased logistics and materials handling costs that come with the larger supply radius required to feed a large-scale facility. Our process remains in a vapor phase throughout resulting in a lower piece-count and, therefore, lower capital cost. We expect that emerging technologies in the future may also present competition to us.

Research & Development

Primus invested over $110 million in developing and patenting its technology and conducted over 10,500 hours of testing at our Hillsborough, New Jersey demonstration facility. Since we acquired Primus’ assets, our team has invested approximately $5 million to design the chemical processes and systems required to produce an acceptable synthesis gas from renewable feedstocks, and Verde plans to invest approximately $3 million in 2024 to engage a new FEED study in support of our Permian Basin natural gas-to-gasoline facility, which is expected to take approximately eight months to complete. We expect that the facilities of the scope and scale that we anticipate designing could require an estimated $100 to $200 million of additional capital expenditures per facility and take 18 to 24 months to construct. Our R&D team is also in the early stage of developing additional process technology to produce middle distillates, including diesel and aviation fuel.

Raw Materials and Suppliers

We plan to use renewable feedstocks, such as biomass or natural gas, and other feedstocks to produce our renewable or lower-carbon gasoline. We plan on contracting with various suppliers for renewable feedstocks, and intend to work with other commercial waste companies, agricultural industry participants and landowners to source our renewable feedstocks and maintain an established supply of product inputs. Additionally, to lower feedstock costs and maximize the ease of access to sufficient feedstock volumes for commercial production, we intend to develop future commercial production facilities in locations near biomass, natural gas or other feedstock sources. We do not intend to be dependent on sole source or limited source suppliers for any of our raw materials or chemicals. Additionally, as we intend to rely on various suppliers for the catalysts we use in our STG+® process, we do not expect to be dependent on a sole source for our supply of catalysts.

Human Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2023, we had six full-time employees and engaged six consultants on a part-time basis. Our workforce is mostly concentrated in the Texas and New Jersey regions. We have a seasoned leadership team with over 100 years of cumulative experience in the renewables field or a functionally equivalent industry. Our management team places significant focus and attention on matters concerning our human capital assets, and is focused on supporting diversity, enhancing capability development and succession planning. Accordingly, we review as appropriate employee development and succession plans for each of our functions to identify and develop our pipeline of talent. To date, we have not experienced any work stoppages and consider our relationship with our employees to be in good standing.

Customers

With RBOB as our product, we are able to market to a broad range of potential counterparties including refiners and importers of gasoline, distributors, blenders, retailers and trading organizations, among others. We intend to enter into offtake agreements with creditworthy counterparties with terms that are acceptable to lenders and us as support for our project financing.

Renewable gasoline. We transitioned into the renewable energy industry after applying our STG+® technology to focus on renewable inputs, expanding our potential customer base beyond the natural gas sector and traditional gasoline consumers in this space. Our potential customers will generally include companies obligated to purchase physical volumes of renewable fuel under the RFS program, such as refiners, blenders, fuel distributors and retailers and marketers, as well as trading shops.

*Natural Gas.*We have a strategic partnership with Cottonmouth Ventures LLC, a subsidiary of Diamondback, to develop natural gas-to-gasoline facilities in the Permian Basin. We believe that these facilities will create a higher-value sales channel for natural gas producers by converting economically disadvantaged natural gas into high value gasoline. Verde believes that similar strategic partnerships can be formed in other natural gas constrained basins such as the Appalachian Basin, the Williston Basin, and the Uinta Basin. These opportunities are not limited to producing basins in the United States. The Company expects to find similar opportunities globally.

Carbon credits. Expanding the application of our STG+® technology will also expand how we can create revenue opportunities. We expect the value of our operations will include carbon credits derived from converting waste and other bio-feedstocks into a single, finished fuel, which can have value. For example, certain gasoline produced from renewable feedstock, such as cellulosic biomass, qualifies under the RFS for the D3 RIN (a carbon credit). Similarly, we expect that gasoline produced in this fashion will also qualify for various state carbon programs including California’s LCFS. We anticipate that we will produce 1.5 RINs per gallon of gasoline, which can be sold alongside each gallon of renewable gasoline as a separate commodity to customers who can sell the RINs later or solely into forward or futures markets.

However, as with other government programs, the use requirements of the RFS program and similar state-level programs are subject to change, which could materially harm our ability to operate profitably.

Regulatory Environment

Demand for renewable fuel has grown significantly over the past several years and is expected to continue to grow due in part to federal requirements for cellulosic biofuel volume obligations through programs such as the RFS, which was created under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (the “Energy Act”), which amended the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) and was expanded through the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (the “EISA”). The EISA requires the use of specific volumes of biofuel in the U.S. and is aimed at (i) increasing energy security by reducing U.S. dependence on foreign oil and establishing domestic green fuel related industries and (ii) improving the environment through the reduction of greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. Under the RFS program, transportation fuel sold in the U.S. must contain a certain minimum volume of renewable fuel. The EPA administers the RFS program with volume requirements for several categories of renewable fuels, which volume requirements are established through a notice-and-comment rulemaking process intended to occur at least 14 months prior to the year in which the volume will be required. On July 12, 2023 (as corrected on August 3, 2023), EPA issued its latest final rule that establishes the biofuel volume requirements for 2023 to 2025. Importantly, these most recent volume requirements include a steady growth of biofuels for 2023, 2024 and 2025. See “Business — Regulatory Mandates and Governmental Funding” for more information. However, as stated above, the RFS program is subject to change, including by modification or repeal by Congressional action or action by the EPA or the EPA administrator and EPA has, in some cases, failed to issue volume requirements sufficiently far in advance, which can contribute to uncertainty for producers of renewable fuels, like us. Similarly, state-level programs like California’s LCFS are also subject to change.

Social and Environmental Preferences and Investor Pressures

The effects of climate change, including extreme weather events and rising temperature and the increased health and socio-economic stability of at-risk populations, have increased public focus on reducing greenhouse gases and moving toward reduced carbon energy solutions. Because of this, we see environmentally conscious policies, initiatives and businesses growing in value and preference among certain stakeholders.

For example, certain segments of the investor community have enhanced their consideration of Environmental, social and corporate governance (“ESG”) factors during the investment process and/or shifted their portfolios away from carbon-intensive assets. In addition, a number of large integrated energy companies have set decarbonization strategies and diversified into different forms of carbon-free and carbon-reduced energy.

Governmental Regulations

Our future operations are subject to stringent and complex laws and regulations governing environmental protection and human health and safety. Compliance with such laws and regulations can be costly, and noncompliance can result in substantial penalties. Laws and regulations that may have an impact on our business include:

●The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (or “CERCLA”) and analogous state laws, impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or the legality of the original act, on certain classes of persons that contributed to the release of a hazardous substance into the environment. These persons include the owner and operator of the site where the release occurred, past owners and operators of the site, and companies that disposed of or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at the site. Responsible parties under CERCLA may be liable for the costs of cleaning up hazardous substances that have been released into the environment and for damages to natural resources. Additionally, it is not uncommon for third parties to assert claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances or other pollutants into the environment.
●The federal Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (or “RCRA”), is the principal federal statute governing the management of wastes, including the treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous wastes. RCRA imposes stringent operating requirements and liability for failure to meet such requirements, on a person who is either a generator or transporter of hazardous waste or an owner or operator of a hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility. We anticipate that many wastes generated by our manufacturing facility or process will be governed by RCRA.
●The federal Water Pollution Control Act (also referred to as the “Clean Water Act”) imposes restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into navigable waters. These controls have become more stringent over the years, and it is possible that additional restrictions may be imposed in the future. Permits must be obtained to discharge pollutants into state and federal waters. The Clean Water Act provides for civil, criminal and administrative penalties for discharges of oil and other pollutants and imposes liability on parties responsible for those discharges for the costs of cleaning up any environmental damage caused by the release and for natural resource damages resulting from the release. Comparable state statutes impose liability and authorize penalties in the case of an unauthorized discharge of petroleum or its derivatives or other pollutants into state waters.
●The CAA and associated state laws and regulations restrict the emission of air pollutants from many sources, including facilities involved in manufacturing biofuels. New facilities are generally required to obtain permits before operations can commence, and new or existing facilities may be required to incur certain capital expenditures to install air pollution control equipment in connection with obtaining and maintaining operating permits and approvals. Federal and state regulatory agencies can impose administrative, civil, and criminal penalties for non-compliance with permits or other requirements of the CAA and associated state laws and regulations.
●The federal Endangered Species Act, the federal Marine Mammal Protection Act and similar federal and state wildlife protection laws prohibit or restrict activities that could adversely impact protected plant and animal species or habitats. Construction of facilities could be prohibited or delayed in areas where such protected species or habitats may be located, or mitigation may be required to accommodate such activities. There is also increasing interest in nature-related matters beyond protected species, such as general biodiversity, which may similarly require us or our customers to incur costs or take other measures which may adversely impact our business or operations.
●The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IR Act”) provides for, among other things, a new clean hydrogen production tax credit, a new credit for sustainable aviation fuel, credits for the production and purchase of electric vehicles, expanding eligibility for and increasing the value of the carbon capture and sequestration credit, extending the biodiesel, renewable diesel and alternative fuels tax credit, funding biofuel refueling infrastructure and providing additional funding for working lands conservation programs for farmers. The IR Act could have many potential impacts on our business that we are continuing to evaluate, including new opportunities to access production tax credits, carbon sequestration credits, and other benefits, which could result in changes in the configuration of the plant, and could slightly delay commercial operation.

We may be required to obtain certain permits to construct and operate our facilities, including those related to air emissions, solid and hazardous waste management and water quality. These permits can be difficult and expensive to obtain and maintain. Our ability to obtain these permits could be impacted by opposition from various stakeholders. Once operational, our facilities will also need to maintain compliance with these permits.

In addition to compliance with environmental regulations, we expect that our future operations will be subject to federal RFS program regulations. The EPA administers the RFS program with volume requirements for several categories of renewable fuels, which volume requirements are established through a notice-and-comment rulemaking process intended to occur at least 14 months prior to the year in which the volume will be required. On July 12, 2023 (as corrected on August 3, 2023), EPA issued a final rule that establishes the biofuel volume requirements for 2023 to 2025. The EPA calculates a blending standard annually based on estimates of gasoline usage from the EIA. Different quotas and blending requirements are determined for cellulosic biofuels, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuels and total renewable fuel. RINs are used to ensure that the prescribed levels of blending are met. EPA’s RFS regulations establish rules for fuel supplied and administer the RIN system for compliance, trading credits and rules for waivers. We anticipate that our renewable gasoline and other future products will benefit from the RFS program. However, as stated above, the use requirements of the RFS program or state programs could change, which may impact our products and harm our ability to operate profitably. See “Business— Regulatory Mandates and Government Funding” for more information.

Climate Change, Regulatory Mandates and Government Funding

Climate change continues to attract considerable public and scientific attention. As a result, numerous proposals have been made and may continue to be made at the international, national, regional, and state levels of government to monitor and limit emissions of GHGs, with the reduction of greenhouse gases from the energy and transportation sectors being a key focus.

For example, continued increases in the federal requirement for cellulosic biofuel volume obligations position us to benefit as a producer of renewable gasoline from cellulosic feedstocks, which we expect will allow us to qualify for the RFS program.

The RFS program was created under the Energy Act, which amended the CAA. The EISA further amended the CAA by expanding the RFS program. The EPA implements the RFS program under the guidance of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Department of Energy.

The RFS program is a federal policy that requires a certain volume of renewable fuel to replace or reduce the quantity of petroleum-based transportation fuel, heating oil or aviation fuel. The four renewable fuel categories under the RFS are each assigned a “D-code” — a code that identifies the renewable fuel type — based on the feedstock used, fuel type produced, energy inputs and GHG reduction thresholds, among other requirements. The four categories of renewable fuel have the following assigned D-codes, as shown below. Lifecycle GHG reduction comparisons are based on a 2005 petroleum baseline as mandated by EISA. Biofuel facilities (domestic and foreign) that were producing fuel prior to enactment of EISA in 2007 are considered “grandfathered” under the statute, meaning these facilities are not required to meet the GHG reductions.

●Cellulosic biofuel, must be produced from cellulose, hemicellulose or lignin and must meet a 60% lifecycle GHG reduction, is assigned a D-code of 3 (cellulosic biofuel) or a D-code of 7 (cellulosic diesel);
●Biomass-based diesel, which must meet a 50% lifecycle GHG reduction, is assigned a D-code of 4;
●Advanced biofuel which can be produced from qualifying renewable biomass (except corn starch) and must meet a 50% GHG reduction, is assigned a D-code of 5; and
●Renewable fuel (non-advanced/conventional biofuel, like ethanol from corn starch) is assigned a D-code of 6 (grandfathered fuels are also assigned a D-code of 6) and must meet a 20% lifecycle GHG reduction threshold.

We believe our renewable gasoline will qualify under the cellulosic biofuel category, qualifying for the D3 RIN.

The 2007 enactment of EISA significantly increased the size of the program and included key changes, including:

●boosting the long-term goals to 36 billion gallons of renewable fuel;
●extending yearly volume requirements out to 2022 by statute and, after 2022, establishing a notice-and-comment rulemaking process by which EPA must determine the applicable volumes at least 14 months prior to the year in which the volume will be required (on July 12, 2023 (as corrected on August 3, 2023), EPA issued a final rule that establishes the biofuel volume requirements for 2023 to 2025);
●adding explicit definitions for renewable fuels to qualify (e.g., renewable biomass, GHG emissions) versus a 2005 petroleum baseline);
●creating grandfathering allowances for volumes from certain existing facilities; and
●including specific types of waiver authorities.

EPA has the authority to adjust cellulosic, advanced and total volumes set by Congress as part of the annual rule process.

The statute also contains a general waiver authority that allows the Administrator to waive the RFS volumes, in whole or in part, based on a determination that implementation of the program is causing severe economic or environmental harm, or based on inadequate domestic supply.

The EPA has approved fuel pathways under the RFS program under all four categories of renewable fuel. Advanced pathways already approved include ethanol made from sugarcane, jet fuel made from camelina, cellulosic ethanol made from corn stover, compressed natural gas from municipal wastewater treatment facility digesters and others. We believe our fuel will qualify for Pathway M.

Lifecycle GHG reduction comparisons are based on a 2005 petroleum baseline as mandated by EISA. Biofuel facilities (domestic and foreign) that were producing fuel prior to enactment of EISA in 2007 are “grandfathered” under the statute, meaning these facilities are not required to meet the GHG reductions.

The EPA continues to review and approve new pathways, including for fuels made with advanced technologies or with new feedstocks. Certain biofuels, such as our renewable gasoline, are similar enough to gasoline or diesel that they do not have to be blended, but can be simply “dropped in” to existing petroleum-based fuels. These drop-in biofuels directly replace petroleum-based fuels and hold particular promise for the future.

Obligated parties under the RFS program are refiners or importers of gasoline or diesel fuel (“Obligated Parties”). Compliance is achieved by blending renewable fuels into transportation fuel, or by obtaining credits, RINs, to meet an EPA-specified renewable volume obligation (“RVO”).

The EPA calculates and establishes RVOs every year through rulemaking, based on the CAA volume requirements and projections of gasoline and diesel production for the coming year. The standards are converted into a percentage and Obligated Parties must demonstrate compliance annually.

Obligated Parties use RINs to demonstrate compliance with the standard. These parties must obtain sufficient RINs for each category in order to demonstrate compliance with the annual standard. Some of the regulations regarding RINs include the following:

●RINs are generated when a producer makes a gallon of renewable fuel.
●At the end of the compliance year, Obligated Parties use RINs to demonstrate compliance.
●RINs can be traded between parties.
●Obligated Parties can buy gallons of renewable fuel with RINs attached. They can also buy RINs on the open market.
●Obligated Parties can carry over unused RINs between compliance years. They may carry a compliance deficit into the next year. This deficit must be made up the following year.

The RFS program’s four renewable fuel categories are “nested” within each other. This means the fuel with a higher GHG reduction threshold can be used to meet the standards for a lower GHG reduction threshold. For example, fuels or RINs for advanced biofuel (e.g., cellulosic, biodiesel or sugarcane ethanol) can be used to meet the total renewable fuel standards.

For cellulosic standards, an additional flexibility is provided by statute. Cellulosic waiver credits (“CWCs”) have historically been offered at a price determined by a formula in the Energy Act. Obligated Parties had the option of purchasing CWCs plus an advanced RIN in lieu of blending cellulosic biofuel or obtaining a cellulosic RIN. As a result, CWCs, in some cases, set a ceiling for cellulosic RIN prices. However, in the EPA’s July 12, 2023 rule (as corrected on August 3, 2023), EPA interpreted its authority in setting RIN volumes for 2023 through 2025 (which, for the first time were not set forth in statute) so as to preclude it from issuing CWCs in those years, absent a future waiver of EPA-established cellulosic standards.

In November 2021, the U.S. Infrastructure Investment and JOBS Act was signed into law that includes $65 billion in funding for power and grid investments. This includes investments in grid reliability and resiliency as well as clean energy technologies such as carbon capture, hydrogen and advanced nuclear, including small modular reactors. Additionally, in December 2021, President Biden signed an executive order mandating all electricity procured by the government be 100% carbon pollution-free by 2030, including at least 50% from around-the-clock dispatchable generation sources. The order also requires that federally owned buildings produce no net emissions by 2045 and that each federal agency achieve 100% zero-emission vehicle acquisitions by 2035.

At the international level, in February 2021, the Biden administration announced reentry of the U.S. into the Paris Agreement (an international agreement from the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris, France, which resulted in an agreement intended for countries to nationally determine their contributions and set GHG emission reduction goals along with a “nationally determined contribution” for U.S. GHG emissions that would achieve emissions reductions of at least 50% relative to 2005 levels by 2030. In addition, in 2021, President Biden publicly announced the Global Methane Pledge, a pact that aims to reduce global methane emissions at least 30% below 2020 levels by 2030, including “all feasible reductions” in the energy sector. Since its formal launch at the United Nations Climate Change Conference, over 150 countries have joined the pledge. At the 27th Conference of the Parties, President Biden announced the EPA’s supplemental proposed rule to reduce methane emissions from existing oil and gas sources and agreed, in conjunction with the European Union and a number of other partner countries, to develop standards for monitoring and reporting methane emissions to help create a market for low methane intensity natural gas. Subsequently, at the 28th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Dubai, member countries (including the United States) entered into an agreement that calls for actions toward achieving, at a global scale, a tripling of renewable energy capacity and doubling energy efficiency improvements by 2030. The goals of the agreement are, among other things, to accelerate efforts toward the phase-down of unabated coal power, phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, and take other measures that drive the transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems. Furthermore, many state and local leaders have intensified or stated their intent to intensify efforts to support international climate commitments and treaties, in addition to considering or enacting laws requiring the disclosure of climate-related information and developing programs that are aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions by means of cap and trade programs, carbon taxes or encouraging the use of renewable energy or alternative low-carbon fuels.

In addition, in March 2024, the SEC issued a rule regarding the enhancement and standardization of mandatory climate-related disclosures for investors. The rule mandates extensive disclosure of climate-related data, risks, and opportunities, including financial impacts, physical and transition risks, related governance and strategy, and, in some instances, Scopes 1 and 2 GHG emissions, for certain public companies.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 711 Louisiana St, Suite 2160, Houston, Texas 77002. Our website is located at www.verdecleanfuels.com.

We furnish or file with the SEC our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and our Current Reports on Form 8-K. We make these documents available free of charge at www.verdecleanfuels.com under the “Investors” tab as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed or furnished with the SEC. In addition, corporate governance information, including our corporate governance guidelines and code of ethics, is also available on our investor relations website under the heading “Governance Documents.” Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any of our other filings with the SEC. The SEC also maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy statements and other information about issuers, like us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is www.sec.gov.

Emerging Growth Company and Smaller Reporting Company Status

We qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). Section 107 of the JOBS Act permits an “emerging growth company” to take advantage of an extended transition time to comply with new or revised accounting standards as applicable to public companies. Thus, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have irrevocably opted out of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. As a result, our financial statements may not be comparable to other emerging growth companies that elect to take advantage of the extended transition period.

We will cease to be an “emerging growth company” upon the earliest to occur of: (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have more than $1.235 billion in annual revenue; (ii) the date we qualify as a large accelerated filer, with at least $700 million of equity securities held by non-affiliates; (iii) the date on which we have, in any three-year period, issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt securities; and (iv) December 31, 2026 (the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of CENAQ becoming a public company).

We are also a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the Exchange Act and may continue to be a smaller reporting company even after we are no longer an emerging growth company. We may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures and reporting requirements available to smaller reporting companies until the fiscal year following the determination that our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is $250 million or more measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter, or our annual revenues $100 million or more during the most recently completed fiscal year and our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is $700 million or more measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.