authID Inc
For the period ended Dec 31, 2023. Filed Mar 20, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2023 · Filed Mar 20, 2024
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
authID Inc.
Denver, Colorado
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of authID Inc. (formerly known as Ipsidy Inc.) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Substantial Doubt about the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s evaluations of the events and conditions and management’s plans regarding those matters are described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter – Stock-based Compensation
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Description of Matter
As described further in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company issued various types of equity awards, including stock options. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded stock option related compensation expense of approximately $487,000. The Company estimated the fair value of stock options granted using either the Black-Scholes option pricing model or the Monte Carlo option pricing model, depending on vesting conditions. The option pricing models required the Company to make several assumptions. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company also accounted for the reversal of recorded reversals of previously recognized stock-based compensation due to forfeitures.
Auditing the Company’s accounting for stock options required auditor judgment due to the subjectivity of significant assumptions used in the option pricing models to estimate the fair value of stock options granted.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
Our principal audit procedures performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:
| ● | We assessed the accuracy and completeness of the awards during the year by reading the relevant Board of Directors minutes and grant documents. |
| ● | We evaluated the appropriateness of the valuation method used for the stock option grants and whether the method used for determining fair value was applied consistently with the valuation of similar grants in prior periods. |
| ● | We evaluated the work performed by management’s specialist in valuing market condition stock option using the Monte Carlo option pricing model. In addition, we used an auditor specialist to assess the reasonableness of management’s specialist’s pricing model and to perform an independent calculation. |
| ● | We evaluated the significant assumptions used by management to calculate the fair value of stock options granted. Such evaluation included independent calculation of the expected volatility based upon actual historical stock price movements over the period equal to the expected option term and assessing the reasonableness of the expected option term based on historical stock options exercised. |
| ● | We developed an independent estimate of the fair value for options granted during the year and compared our estimate of fair value used by management. |
/s/Cherry Bekaert LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.
Tampa, Florida
March 20, 2024
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.