Nano Dimension Ltd.

Note 10 – Equity

Share capital activity was as follows (in thousands of shares of NIS 5 par value per share):

Rights Plan

In January 2024, the Company entered into a rights agreement, or the Original Rights Plan. The Original Rights Plan was designed to reduce the likelihood that any entity, person or group would gain control of, or significant influence over the Company. The Original Rights Plan expired on January 25, 2025.

In February 2026, the Company entered into a rights agreement, or the Rights Plan. The Rights Plan was designed to reduce the likelihood that any entity, person or group would gain control of, or significant influence over the Company. The Rights Plan will expire on February 1, 2027.

Stock Options, RSUs and Warrants

The Company has in effect the Employee Stock Option Plan (2015) (the “2015 Plan”).

The 2015 Plan was adopted by Company’s board of directors in February 2015, and expired in February 2026. On December 4, 2025, the shareholders of the Company approved a resolution to extend the 2015 Plan by an additional one-year period ending in February 2027. The Company’s employees, directors, officers, consultants, advisors, and suppliers are eligible to participate in this plan.

On March 13, 2019, the Company’s board of directors adopted an appendix to the 2015 Plan for U.S. residents. Under this appendix, the 2015 Plan provides for the granting of options to U.S. residents in compliance with the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Of these outstanding awards, as of June 30, 2026,290,834 options to purchase ordinary shares were vested and exercisable.

Stock options

The share options vest over a period of four years. The share options will be exercisable, in consideration of an exercise price, until the earlier of (a) the anniversary of the vesting date of such options, or (b) 90 days from the end of employment date.

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information is as follows:

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were none and $0.3 million million, respectively.

The weighted average remaining contractual life of the outstanding options is 2.1 years as of June 30, 2026.

Restricted stock units (“RSU”)

A summary of the Company’s RSU activity is as follows:

The weighted average fair values at grant date of RSUs granted for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were $1.57 and $1.65 per share, respectively.

The total fair value of shares vested during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 was $4.5 million and $4.4 million, respectively.

As of June 30, 2026, the Company had approximately $4.8 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options and non-vested RSUs, expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.

Warrants

A summary of the Company’s warrants activity and related information is as follows:

As of June 30, 2026, the outstanding warrants include 27,742,103 Series B warrants issued to Stern YOI Ltd. Partnership in August 2020 to purchase Ordinary Shares at an exercise price of $6.16 per ADS and expiring in August 2027. Stern YOI Ltd. Partnership is a Nevada limited partnership. Mr. Yoav Stern, former Chief Executive Officer of Nano Dimension Ltd., is a managing member of Stern YOI Ltd. Partnership. In September 2020, the Company issued 1,500,000 warrants to purchase 1,500,000 ADSs to the Company’s former director, Mr. Yaron Eitan, in consideration of $150,000. The warrants have an exercise price of $2.25 per ADS and will expire in September 2027.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and RSUs is included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss as follows:

Note 11 – Revenue

The Company has one operating and reportable segment, which generates revenue via industrial manufacturing solutions of multi-disciplinary technology - combining hardware, software, and materials science.

Revenue per geographical location is as follows:

The following table disaggregates the Company's revenue by the timing of transfer of products or services:

Contract balances

Timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of invoicing to customers. The Company has a right to bill when products are shipped, which is often the point in time revenue is recognized. As a result, the Company will have accounts receivable for billings and also deferred revenue for the portion of billings in advance of service in its hardware maintenance agreements.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recognized $2.4 million and $6.1 million from the deferred revenue account balance as of December 31, 2025, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company recognized $0.6 million and $1.6 million from the deferred revenue account balance as of December 31, 2024, respectively. During the second quarter of 2026, $1.2 million of deferred revenue was written off related to the AME asset sale.

Deferred revenue is expected to be recognized when the Company provides hardware maintenance services or contractual performance obligations for which the customer has already provided payment with $8.3 million expected to be recognized in the remainder of 2026, $3.2 million expected to be recognized in 2027, $1.3 million expected to be recognized in 2028, and $0.5 million thereafter.

Note 12 – Commitments and contingencies

From time to time, the Company may become a party to various litigation matters incidental to the conduct of its business. Except as disclosed below, the Company is not presently party to any legal proceedings the resolution of which the Company believes would have a material adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition, liquidity, results of operation, cash flows or capital levels.

On September 20, 2024, Markforged entered into a settlement agreement with Continuous Composites Inc. (“Continuous Composites”) related to previous litigation (the “Settlement Agreement”) to resolve all claims and counterclaims. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Markforged made an initial upfront payment of $18 million to Continuous Composites on October 10, 2024, and a payment of $1 million in December 2025. Markforged is required to make two additional installment payments thereafter of $2 million and $4 million in the fourth quarters of fiscal years 2026 and 2027, respectively. In consideration of such payments, the Settlement Agreement provided for the dismissal of all claims with prejudice, cross-licenses of the parties’ respective patent portfolios, a mutual release of claims for liabilities arising prior to the effective date of the Settlement Agreement and mutual covenants not to sue. The incremental amount due under the Settlement Agreement compared to the original verdict is determined to be representative of the amount attributable to the licensing of the patent rights contemplated under the Settlement Agreement and was recognized as an intangible asset of $5.5 million, after discount using a rate of 12%. The intangible asset will be amortized to cost of revenue over the 23 year life of the patents. Total amortization expense of $0.1 million was recognized from during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, and included in cost of revenue. The remaining future payments of $6.0 million under the Settlement Agreement as of June 30, 2026 are secured by a Security Agreement by and between Markforged and Continuous Composites (the “Security Agreement”). The Company has recorded a settlement payable on the condensed consolidated balance sheet of approximately $5.0 million, of which $2.0 million is a current liability. The settlement payable will accrete $1.0 million over the remaining payment term recognized as interest expense. Interest expense related to settlement payable was $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, and $0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025.

On July 8, 2025, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP (“Quinn”) filed a lawsuit against Nano Dimension Ltd. and Ofir Baharav (“Defendants”). Quinn alleges that Defendants tortiously interfered with Quinn’s contract with Desktop Metal, and prevented Desktop Metal from paying Quinn approximately $30.0 million. Quinn also asserts that Defendants are liable pursuant to an alleged attorney’s lien and engaged in unfair and deceptive practices, in violation of Massachusetts law. The case is pending in the Business Litigation Session of the Suffolk Superior Court in Massachusetts. Defendants moved to dismiss. That motion was fully briefed in February 2026, argued on March 16, 2026, and remains pending.

During the third quarter of 2025, certain former employees or vendors of the Company or its subsidiaries filed lawsuits alleging that the Company is in breach of certain agreements and are entitled to certain compensation and other benefits. These matters settled during the second quarter of 2026 with payment of $2.3 million that was previously accrued.

During the fourth quarter of 2025, Markforged processed a $1.4 million payment to an account believed to be controlled by one of our vendors, however it was subsequently discovered that this account was not owned by the vendor. The Company suspects that a threat actor gained access to a valid email account of the vendor and used this account to fraudulently change payment instructions. The Company has notified its insurance carrier and engaged breach counsel as well as a forensics partner to help with the investigation. Pending conclusion of the investigation, approximately $1.3 million is accrued at June 30, 2026 as the estimated amount of probable loss which is included as part of general and administrative operating expenses.

During the second quarter of June 2026, plaintiff Stephen Sorensen, the trustee for the Desktop Liquidation Trust, which is an entity created as part of Desktop’s liquidation to file lawsuits and marshal assets for distribution to Desktop’s creditors (the “Trustee”) filed an adversary proceeding in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, against the Company, Markforged, and Desktop Metal’s former leadership (the “Director Defendants”), alleging that (a) the Director Defendants breached fiduciary duties owed to Desktop by failing to include a provision in the Desktop Merger Agreement requiring Nano to repurchase more than $115.0 million of Desktop’s notes (the “Notes”) that came due as a result of the Merger, (b) in the alternative, the Merger Agreement included an unwritten implied promise by Nano to repurchase the Notes for $115.0 million plus interest, and (c) that Markforged misappropriated certain trade secrets concerning 3D printing titanium from Desktop at Nano’s direction after Nano acquired both entities in April 2025. The Company and Markforged intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit.

Note 13 – Income Tax

The Company’s effective tax rate was 2.25% and 0.67% for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 0.20% and 0.27% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The reconciliation between the Israel statutory federal income tax rate of 23% and the effective tax rate primarily reflects pre-tax losses incurred in domestic and foreign jurisdictions for which no tax benefit was recognized due to a valuation allowance recorded against the majority of deferred tax assets. The Company maintained a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets as of both June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

Note 14 – Segments

Operating segments are defined as components of an entity for which separate financial information is available and regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s CODM is its Chief Executive Officer.

The CODM evaluates the Company’s financial information and resources and assesses the performance of these resources on a consolidated basis using adjusted EBITDA.

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure defined as earnings before interest income and expense, income tax (benefit) expense, depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation expense, exchange rate differences, finance expenses (income) for revaluation of assets and liabilities, Desktop Metal litigation related expenses, Desktop Metal and Markforged transaction related expenses, restructuring costs, impact of deconsolidation, impairment losses, litigation settlements and contingencies and step-up amortization from purchase accounting. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA and operating expenses, as described above, should also be useful in evaluating the performance of our business. Like EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to period and company to company by backing out potential differences caused by variations in capital structures (affecting other financial expenses (income), net), and the age and depreciation charges and amortization of fixed and intangible assets, respectively (affecting relative depreciation and amortization expense, respectively), as well as from share-based payments, restructuring costs, impairment losses, and step-up amortization from purchase accounting. Adjusted EBITDA and operating expenses are useful to an investor in evaluating our operating performance because it is widely used by investors, securities analysts and other interested parties to measure a company’s operating performance without regard to non-cash items, such as expenses related to share-based payments.

There is not any revenue, expense, or asset information, that is supplemental to those disclosed in these condensed consolidated financial statements or below, that are regularly provided to the CODM for evaluation of thesingle operating segment. The adjusted EBITDA reconciliations for thethree and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 are as follows:

(1) Net loss from continuing operations in corporate adjustments relate to those costs incurred at the parent company level, such as financing gains and losses, gains and losses on marketable securities, and corporate overhead costs inclusive of public company costs, legal, corporate headcount, and real estate related costs.

Note 15 – Net Loss Per Share

The Company computes basic net loss per share using net loss attributable to the Company’s common shareholders and the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share include shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and stock-based awards where the conversion of such instruments would be dilutive. The Company does this through the treasury stock method. The calculations presented below represent the basic and diluted net loss per share for all classes of securities.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, the Company was in a net loss position, thus the effect of potentially dilutive securities was excluded from the denominator for the calculation of diluted net loss per share because the inclusion of such securities would be antidilutive. The following dilutive securities are excluded from the denominator:

Note 16 – Subsequent Events

Lease Amendment

On July 15, 2026, the Company entered into an agreement to terminate the lease for its current corporate headquarters, effective December 31, 2026, in exchange for a one-time payment of $13.0 million paid when entering in to the agreement.

Departure of Directors and Officers; Election of Directors

On July 17, 2026, Nano Dimension Ltd. (the “Company”) entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and among the Company, members of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), and Murchinson Ltd. and its affiliated entities and persons (collectively, “Murchinson”).

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, (i) each of Robert Pons, David Stehlin, Dr. Joshua Rosensweig, and Andrew Sriubas (the “Departing Directors”) resigned from the Board and all positions with the Company and its subsidiaries, effective immediately following execution of the Agreement, (ii) the Company appointed each of Pinchos (Paul) Fruchthandler, Moshe Rozenbaum and Eliezer Eli Tarlow (the “New Directors”) to serve as a member of the Board as a Class I, Class II and Class III director, respectively, with an initial term expiring at the Company’s 2026 annual general meeting of shareholders to fill the vacancies resulting from the resignations of the Departing Directors, and (iii) Murchinson irrevocably withdrew its demand, dated May 21, 2026, that the Company call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders (the “EGM”) to vote on various proposals submitted by Murchinson, enabling the Company to cancel the EGM previously scheduled to be held on July 31, 2026, which has been cancelled. In addition, parties to the Agreement also agreed to certain litigation-related provisions, including a mutual release of certain claims and a covenant not to initiate or pursue certain legal proceedings, as well as certain non-disparagement provisions.

Appointment of Interim Chief Executive Officer

On July 21, 2026, Mr. Rozenbaum was appointed as the Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company.