LM FUNDING AMERICA, INC.
For the period ended Mar 31, 2026. Filed May 15, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Mar 31, 2026 · Filed May 15, 2026
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
LM Funding America, Inc. (“we”, “our”, “LMFA” or the “Company”) was formed as a Delaware corporation on April 20, 2015.
LMFA is the sole member of several entities including LM Funding, LLC, which was organized in January 2008; US Digital Mining and Hosting Co., LLC, which was formed on September 10, 2021 (“US Digital”); LMFA Financing LLC, formed on November 23, 2020; and LMFAO Sponsor LLC, which was formed on October 29, 2020 (LMFA is a majority member of LMFAO Sponsor LLC). US Digital has created various 100% owned subsidiaries to engage in business in various states in connection with its Bitcoin mining business.
The Company also from time to time organizes other subsidiaries to serve a specific purpose or hold a specific asset.
Business Operations
The Company currently maintains three distinct business operations: our Bitcoin treasury operations, Bitcoin mining business and our specialty finance business.
Our investment strategy with respect to our Bitcoin treasury operations involves retaining a majority of our currently held Bitcoin and acquiring new Bitcoin through our mining operations. We may sell or leverage our Bitcoin to support operational needs and strategic initiatives. Our Bitcoin mining operation deploys our computing power to mine Bitcoin on the Bitcoin network. We conduct this business through our wholly owned subsidiary, US Digital, a Florida limited liability company, which we formed in 2021 to develop and operate our Bitcoin mining business. With respect to our specialty finance business, the Company has historically engaged in the business of providing funding to nonprofit community associations primarily located in the state of Florida. We offer incorporated nonprofit community associations, which we refer to as “Associations,” a variety of financial products customized to each Association’s financial needs.
Bitcoin Treasury Operations and Strategy
Our Bitcoin treasury strategy for the next twelve months includes acquiring and holding Bitcoin, using cash flows from operations that exceed working capital requirements, and from time to time, subject to market conditions, issuing equity or debt securities or engaging in other capital raising transactions with the objective of using the proceeds to purchase Bitcoin. We have not set any specific target for the amount of Bitcoin we seek to hold, and we will continue to monitor market conditions in determining whether to engage in additional Bitcoin purchases. This overall strategy also contemplates that we may periodically sell Bitcoin for general corporate purposes or in connection with strategies that generate tax benefits in accordance with applicable law, enter into additional capital raising transactions, including those that could be collateralized by its Bitcoin holdings, and consider pursuing strategies to create income streams or otherwise generate funds using our Bitcoin holdings. As of March 31, 2026, we owned 164.2 Bitcoins. This does not include 174 Bitcoins classified as Digital assets receivable as of March 31, 2026.
We currently maintain a formal, documented strategy that governs circumstances under which we acquire or monetize our Bitcoin holdings. Decisions to purchase or sell Bitcoin are made on a case-by-case basis at management’s discretion, taking into account factors such as our liquidity, general market conditions, and anticipated cash requirements. As of March 31, 2026, Bitcoin represented 100% of our treasury holdings. We do have small holdings of Tether and USDC outside of our treasury holdings that value in the aggregate less than $10,000 and are used for purchases with merchants that accepts such crypto assets as payment. We do not currently engage in hedging activities. We have not implemented derivative transactions, futures, options, swaps, or other financial instruments to reduce our exposure to Bitcoin price volatility. Any future hedging activity, if undertaken, would be determined by management on a discretionary basis.
Bitcoin Mining Business
We obtain Bitcoin as a result of our mining operations, and we sell Bitcoin from time to time, to support our operations and strategic growth. We plan to convert our Bitcoin to U.S. dollars. We may engage in regular trading of Bitcoin or engage in hedging activities related to our holding of Bitcoin. However, our decisions to hold or sell Bitcoin at any given time may be impacted by the Bitcoin market, which has been historically characterized by significant volatility. Currently, we do not use a formula or specific methodology to determine whether or when we will sell Bitcoin that we hold, or the number of Bitcoins we will sell. Rather, decisions to hold or sell Bitcoins are currently determined by management by monitoring the market in real time.
As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company had approximately 7,500 and 7,200 machines respectively, which amounted to operating units capable of producing 851 petahash and 750 petahash, respectively, per second (“EH/s”) of computing power.
Specialty Finance Company
In our specialty finance business, we purchase an Association’s right to receive a portion of the Association’s collected proceeds from owners that are not paying their assessments. After taking assignment of an Association’s right to receive a portion of the Association’s proceeds from the collection of delinquent assessments, we engage law firms to perform collection work on a deferred billing basis wherein the law firms receive payment upon collection from the account debtors or a predetermined contracted amount if payment from account debtors is less than legal fees and costs owed. Under this business model, we typically fund an amount equal to or less than the statutory minimum an Association could recover on a delinquent account for each Account, which we refer to as the “Super Lien Amount”. Upon collection of an Account, the law firm working on the Account, on behalf of the Association, generally distributes to us the funded amount, interest, and administrative late fees, with the law firm retaining legal fees and costs collected, and the Association retaining the balance of the collection. In connection with this line of business, we have developed proprietary software for servicing Accounts, which we believe enables law firms to service Accounts efficiently and profitably. Our original product offering consists of providing funding to Associations by purchasing their rights under delinquent accounts that are selected by the Associations arising from unpaid Association assessments. Historically, we provided funding against such delinquent accounts, which we refer to as “Accounts,” in exchange for a portion of the proceeds collected by the Associations from the account debtors on the Accounts. In addition to our original product offering, we also purchase Accounts on varying terms tailored to suit each Association’s financial needs, including under our New Neighbor Guaranty™ program.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LMFA and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: LM Funding, LLC; REO Management Holdings, LLC (including all 100% owned subsidiary limited liability companies); LM Funding of Colorado, LLC; LM Funding of Washington, LLC; LM Funding of Illinois, LLC; US Digital (includes all 100% owned subsidiary limited liability companies) and various single purpose limited liability corporations owned by REO Management Holdings, LLC which own various properties. It also includes LMFA Sponsor LLC (a 69.5% owned subsidiary). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. The interim consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2026 and for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025, respectively, are unaudited. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to provide a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2025, is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
There were no new accounting pronouncements adopted during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 that were determined to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-04, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options: Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt Instruments(“ASU 2024-04”), which clarifies the requirements for determining whether certain settlements of convertible debt instruments should be accounted for as an induced conversion or extinguishments of convertible debt. ASU 2024-04 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2025, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. There was no impact of the standard on the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”), which requires public business entities to provide additional disclosures in the notes to financial statements, disaggregating specific expense categories within relevant income statement captions. The prescribed categories include purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, intangible asset amortization, and depreciation, depletion, and amortization related to oil-and-gas producing activities. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its financial statement disclosures.
Segment and Reporting Unit Information
Operating segments are defined as components of an entity for which discrete financial information is available that is regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing performance. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company comprise the CODM, as a group. The Company hastwo operating segments as of March 31, 2026, which we refer to as Specialty Finance and Mining & Treasury Operations. Our corporate oversight function and other components that may earn revenues that are only incidental to the activities of the Company are aggregated and included in the “All Other” category. Refer to Note 10 -Segment Information.
Reclassification
Certain prior period immaterial amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations.
Liquidity
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The going concern basis of presentation assumes that the Company will continue in operation one year after the date these financial statements are issued and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The evaluation of going concern under the accounting guidance requires significant judgment which involves the Company to consider that it has historically incurred losses in recent years as it has prepared to grow its business through expansion and acquisition opportunities. The Company must also consider its current liquidity as well as future market and economic conditions that may be deemed outside the control of the Company as it relates to obtaining financing and generating future profits. As of March 31, 2026, the Company had$801 thousand available cash on-hand and Bitcoin with a fair market value of $11.2 million (of which $7.7 million is pledged as collateral against outstanding borrowings and classified within“Digital assets - collateral” on theconsolidated balance sheets). In addition, the Company had Bitcoin with a fair market value of $11.9 million classified as Digital assets receivable which is pledged as collateral against $11 million of borrowings. Bitcoin classified as“Digital assets - long term” could be utilized for operational purposes if necessary. After considering its current liquidity and future market and economic conditions, the Company has concluded there is no substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates include the evaluation of probable losses on balances due from third parties, the realization of deferred tax assets, the evaluation of contingent losses related to litigation and reserves on notes receivables, estimates of the recoverability and useful lives of long-lived assets and stock-based compensation. Our estimates may change, however, as new events occur and additional information is obtained, and any such changes will be recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
Cash
The Company maintains cash balances at several financial institutions that are insured under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (“FDIC”) Transition Account Guarantee Program. Balances with the financial institutions may exceed federally insured limits. As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 we have $260 thousand and $0.4 million of cash in various institutions that exceed the FDIC or SIPC insurance coverage limit of $250,000.
Digital Assets
When applicable, Bitcoin held under our treasury strategy are included in long term assets in the consolidated balance sheets due to the Company’s intention to hold the Bitcoin for long term investment. Bitcoin expected to be used for general working capital purposes are included in current assets in the consolidated balance sheets due to the Company’s ability to sell Bitcoin in a highly liquid marketplace and such Bitcoin holdings are expected to be realized in cash or sold or consumed during the normal operating cycle of the Company. As a result of adopting ASC 350-60 on January 1, 2024, Bitcoin is measured at fair value as of each reporting period. The fair value of Bitcoin is measured using the period-end closing Bitcoin price from its principal market in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. Since Bitcoin is traded on a 24-hour period, the Company utilizes the price as of at fair value at 23:59:59 UTC time, which aligns with the Company's revenue recognition cut-off. The decrease (increase) in fair value from each reporting period is reflected on the consolidated statements of operations as “Loss (gain) on fair value of Bitcoin, net”. The Company sells Bitcoin and such gains and losses from such transactions are measured as the difference between the cash proceeds and the carrying basis of Bitcoin as determined on a First In-First Out basis and are recorded within “Loss (gain) on fair value of Bitcoin, net”.
Bitcoin, which is non-cash consideration earned by the Company through its mining activities, are included as a reconciling item as a cash outflow within operating activities on the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. The cash proceeds from the sales of Bitcoin are classified based on the holding period in which the Bitcoin are held. ASC 350-60 specifies that Bitcoin converted nearly immediately into cash would qualify as cash flows from operating activities and all other sales would qualify as investing activities. The Company evaluates its sales of Bitcoin and will record Bitcoin sold nearly immediately as operating cash flows and the remainder will be recorded as investing activities. During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, all proceeds from Bitcoin sales were classified as investing activities.
Digital Assets Receivable, net
The Company has pledged Bitcoin as collateral for a draw under its loan facility (the “Galaxy Loan Facility”) with Galaxy Digital LLC (“Galaxy”). While the loan is outstanding, Galaxy has the right and the ability to use the digital assets at its discretion, including the ability to sell or pledge the borrowed digital assets to third parties. Following the Company's full payment of the loan, Galaxy is obligated to return the same type and quantity of digital assets as those pledged by the Company.
The digital assets receivable are initially measured upon transfer at fair value and subsequently remeasured at fair value at each reporting period. The changes in fair value are recognized on the consolidated statements of operations, in accordance with ASC 350-60.
The digital assets receivable balance is evaluated for possible credit losses, in accordance with ASC 326 - Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. The allowance for credit losses on digital assets receivable under the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model is determined by utilizing the profitability of default (“PD”) loss given default (“LGD”) approach. In order to apply the PD LGD approach, management considers the remaining expected life of the loans and forecasts of future economic conditions. Allowance for credit losses are included within “Digital assets receivable, net” on the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 2.
Derivatives
The Company evaluates its financing and service arrangements to determine whether certain arrangements contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives requiring bifurcation in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Embedded derivatives that are required to be bifurcated from the host instrument or arrangement are accounted for and valued as separate financial instruments. As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 there was an embedded derivative recognized related to the Galaxy Loan Facility (refer to Note 6).
The Company does not elect to designate derivative instruments as hedges for accounting purposes. As such, our derivative instruments are recorded at fair value each reporting period as “Galaxy loan derivative asset” or “Galaxy loan derivative liability” on the consolidated balance sheets, with subsequent changes in fair value included in “Gain (loss) on Galaxy loan derivative” on the consolidated statements of operations. The Company classifies derivative assets or liabilities as current or non-current based on whether settlement of the instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Investment in Securities
Investment in securities includes investments in common stocks which are reported at fair value with changes in unrecognized gains or losses included in “Unrealized loss on marketable securities” within the consolidated statements of operations.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
FASB ASC 825-10, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet.
Fixed Assets
The Company capitalizes all acquisitions of fixed assets in excess of $500. Fixed assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. State and local use tax for equipment shipped from overseas is generally accrued on a quarterly basis at the time equipment is placed in service and is paid to the state in which the equipment is being utilized. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets and commences once the assets are ready for their intended use. Fixed assets are comprised of furniture, computer, office equipment, buildings and mining machines with assigned useful lives of 3 to 30 years.
The Company classifies mining machine deposit payments within “Deposits on mining equipment” in the consolidated balance sheets. As mining machines are received, the respective cost of the mining machines plus the related shipping and customs fees are reclassified from “Deposits on mining equipment” to “Fixed assets, net” in the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 4 - Deposits on Mining Equipment.
The Company operates in an emerging industry for which limited data is available to make estimates of the useful economic lives of mining machines. To the extent that any of the assumptions underlying management’s estimate of useful life of its mining machines are subject to revision in a future reporting period, either as a result of changes in circumstances or through the availability of greater quantitiesof data, then the estimated useful life could change and have a prospective impact on depreciation expense and the carrying amounts of these assets.
Right to Use Assets
The Company capitalizes all leased assets pursuant to ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liability, initially measured at present value of the lease payments, on its balance sheet for leases with terms longer than 12 months and classified as either financing or operating leases. As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, right to use assets, net of accumulated amortization, was $0.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Management reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment amount is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. There wasno impairment recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.
Revenue Recognition – Bitcoin Mining
Our accounting policy on revenue recognition for our Bitcoin mining segment is provided below.
Step 1: The Company enters into a contract with a Bitcoin mining pool operator (i.e., the customer) to provide hash calculations to the mining pools. The contract is terminable at any time by either party and thus the contract term is shorter than a 24-hour period and the contracts are continuously renewed. The Company provides pool and firmware services solely for Bitcoin mining and the fees charged by the customer during the three months ended March 31, 2026 were approximately 1.9% of the total daily Bitcoin mined.
Applying the criteria per ASC 606-10-25-1, the contract arises at the point that the Company provides hash calculations to the customer, which is considered at contract inception, because customer consumption is in tandem with daily earnings of delivery of the computing power.
Step 2: In order to identify the performance obligations in a contract with a customer, the Company must assess the promised goods or services in the contract and identify each promised good or service that is distinct. A performance obligation meets ASC 606’s definition of a “distinct” good or service (or bundle of goods or services) if both of the following criteria are met:
The customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer (i.e., the good or service is capable of being distinct); and
The entity’s promise to transfer the good or service to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract (i.e., the promise to transfer the good or service is distinct within the context of the contract).
Based on these criteria, the Company has a single performance obligation in providing hash calculations to the customer. The continuous renewal options do not represent material rights because they do not provide the customer with the right to purchase additional goods or services at a discount. Specifically, the contract is renewed at the same terms, conditions, and rate as the current contract which is consistent with market rates, and there are no upfront or incremental fees in the initial contract. The Company has full control of the mining equipment utilized in the mining pool and if the Company determines it will increase or decrease the processing power of its machines and/or fleet (i.e., for repairs or when power costs are excessive) the computing power provided to the customer will be reduced.
Step 3: The transaction consideration the Company earns is non-cash consideration in the form of Bitcoin, which the Company measures at fair value at 23:59:59 UTC on the date of contract inception using the Company's principal market for Bitcoin. Although the contract renews continuously throughout the day, and thus the value of the consideration should be assessed continuously throughout the day, the Company has concluded that using the 23:59:59 UTC Bitcoin price each day does not result in a materially different outcome. According to the Customer contract, daily settlements are made to the Company by the Customer based on the hash calculations provided over contract periods and the payout is made the following day. When participating in ratable share pools, in exchange for providing hash calculations the Company is entitled to a fractional share of the Bitcoin award the Customer receives for successfully adding a block to the blockchain, plus a fractional share of the transaction fees attached to that blockchain. The Company’s fractional share is based on the proportion of hash calculations the Company contributed to the Customer compared to the total hash calculations contributed by all mining pool participants in solving the current algorithm. When participating in a Full Pay Per Share (“FPPS”) mining pool, in exchange for providing hash calculations to the pool the Company is entitled to compensation, calculated on a daily basis, at an amount that approximates the total Bitcoin that could have been mined using the Company’s hash calculations, calculated on a look-back basis across previous blocks using the pool’s hash rate index. The transaction consideration the Company earns is variable since it is dependent on the daily computing power provided by the Company under the FPPS model and total Bitcoin earned by the Company under the ratable share model. There are no other forms of variable considerations, such as discounts, rebates, refunds, credits, price concessions, incentives, performance bonuses, penalties, or other similar items. The sum of the block reward and transaction fees earned by the Company is reduced by mining pool fees charged by the Customer for operating the mining pool based on a rate schedule per the mining pool contract. The mining pool fee is only incurred to the extent we perform hash calculations and generate revenue in accordance with the customer’s payout formula during the continuously renewed contract periods beginning midnight UTC and ending 23:59:59 UTC daily. This amount represents consideration paid to the customer and is thus reported as a reduction in revenue.
Step 4: The transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation upon verification for the provision of hash calculations to the customer, and total Bitcoin rewards earned by the pool, when applicable under a ratable share model. There is a single performance obligation (i.e., hashrate) for the contract; therefore, all consideration from the customer is allocated to this single performance obligation.
Step 5: The Company’s performance is complete in transferring the hash calculations over-time to the customer and the customer obtains control of the contributed hashrate. The performance obligation of hash calculations is fulfilled over time, as opposed to a point in time, because the Company provides the hash calculations throughout the contract period and the customer simultaneously obtains control of it and uses the asset to produce Bitcoin. There are no deferred revenues or other liability obligations recorded by the Company since there are no payments in advance of the performance. Bitcoin earned by the Company through its mining activities are included within operating activities on the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.
Cost of Revenues - Digital Assets
The Company includes energy costs and external co-location mining hosting fees in cost of revenues. Depreciation of mining machines is included within “Depreciation and amortization” in the consolidated statements of operations.
Curtailment and Energy Sales
For our Oklahoma mining site, the energy costs are incurred at market price with no power purchase agreements for a fixed future rate. The Company has a “Will Serve agreement” with the local energy company that provides credits based on amount of electricity provided and based on reducing power consumption upon peak demand times. The Company utilizes a third-party broker to facilitate its participation in demand response programs offered by the Southwest Power Pool (“SPP”), a regional transmission organization that manages the electric grid and wholesale power for the central United States. The broker analyzes the forecasted power consumption, market value of Bitcoin and day-ahead energy prices to determine whether estimated mining revenues will exceed the energy cost incurred by the Company to operate its mining equipment (“breakeven price”) for each hour of the following day. If the Company's estimated revenues are predicted to fall below the breakeven price, power will be curtailed, and we will receive compensation from the SPP in exchange for supplying power to the grid (“Energy Sales”). If estimated revenue is above the breakeven price, the Company receives compensation for pledging its estimated power usage as available for curtailment in the event SPP needs to adjust load for grid balancing (“Curtailment”). We rece ived $367 thousand and $150 thousand of compensation related to curtailment and energy sales during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, which is recorded as“Curtailment and energy sales” in the consolidated statements of operations.
Utility Deposit Bond
In lieu of maintaining a cash utility deposit with the energy provider for our Oklahoma mining site, we purchased a utility deposit bond which guarantees that the energy provider would receive payment from the third party surety up to an amount of $717 thousand in the event the Company defaults on utility charges. The Company pays an annual premium of approximately $14 thousand for the utility deposit bond and the cost of the bond is amortized ratably over thetwelve-month coverage period.
Revenue Recognition - Specialty Finance
FASB ASC 606 states an entity needs to conclude at the inception of the contract that collectability of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for the goods and services that will be transferred to the customer is probable. That is, in some circumstances, an entity may not need to assess its ability to collect all of the consideration in the contract. The Company provides funding to Associations by purchasing their rights under delinquent accounts from unpaid Association assessments due from property owners. Collections on the Accounts may vary greatly in both the timing and amount ultimately recovered compared with the total revenues earned on the Accounts because of a variety of economic and social factors affecting the real estate environment in general.
The Company’s contracts with its specialty finance customers have very specific performance obligations. The Company has determined that the known amount of cash to be realized or realizable on its revenue generating activities cannot be reasonably estimated and as such, classifies its finance receivables as nonaccrual and recognizes revenues in the accompanying statements of income on the cash basis or cost recovery method in accordance with ASC 310-10, Receivables. The Company’s operations also consist of rental revenue earned from tenants under leasing arrangements which provide for rent income. The leases have been accounted for as operating leases. For operating leases, revenue is recorded based on cash rental payments collected during the period. The Company analyzed its remaining revenue streams and concluded there were no changes in revenue recognition with the adoption of the new standard.
Under ASC 606, the Company applies the cash basis method to its original product and the cost recovery method to its special product as follows:
Finance Receivables—Original Product: Under the Company’s original product, delinquent assessments are funded only up to the Super Lien Amount as discussed above. Recoverability of funded amounts is generally assured because of the protection of the Super Lien Amount. As such, payments by unit owners on the Company’s original product are recorded to income when received in accordance with the provisions of the Florida Statutes (Section 718.116(3)) and the provisions of the purchase agreements entered into between the Company and Associations. Those provisions require that all payments be applied in the following order: first to interest, then to late fees, then to costs of collection, then to legal fees expended by the Company and then to assessments owed. In accordance with the cash basis method of recognizing revenue and the provisions of the statute, the Company records revenues for interest and late fees when cash is received. In the event the Company determines the ultimate collectability of amounts funded under its original product are in doubt, payments are applied to first reduce the funded or principal amount.
Finance Receivables—Special Product (New Neighbor Guaranty program): During 2012, the Company began offering Associations an alternative product under the New Neighbor Guaranty program whereby the Company will fund amounts in excess of the Super Lien Amount. Under this special product, the Company purchases substantially all of the delinquent assessments owed to the Association, in addition to all accrued interest and late fees, in exchange for payment by the Company of (i) a negotiated amount or (ii) on a going forward basis, all monthly assessments due for a period up to 48 months. Under these arrangements, the Company considers the collection of amounts funded is not assured and under the cost recovery method, cash collected is applied to first reduce the carrying value of the funded or principal amount with any remaining proceeds applied next to interest, late fees, legal fees, collection costs and any amounts due to the Association. Any excess proceeds still remaining are recognized as revenues. If the future proceeds collected are lower than the Company’s funded or principal amount, then a loss is recognized.
Net Commission Revenue: The Company acts as an agent in providing health travel insurance policies. As a result, the Company revenue is recorded at net. The Company has determined that the known amount of cash to be realized or realizable on its revenue generating activities can be reasonably estimated and as such, classifies its receivables as accrual and recognizes revenues in the accompanying statements of income on the accrual basis. If a policy is not effective as of the end of a period, then the associated revenue and underwriting costs are deferred until the effective date. The majority of the commission revenue is underwritten by two policy underwriters who pay the Company commissions.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company records all equity-based incentive grants to employees and non-employee members of the Company’s Board of Directors in operating expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations based on their fair values determined on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation expense, reduced for estimated forfeitures, is recognized over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting term of the outstanding equity awards. The expense attribution method is straight-line or accelerated graded-vesting depending on the nature of the award.
Income Taxes
The Company’s calculation of its tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in various taxing jurisdictions. The Company recognizes tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on management’s estimate of whether it is more likely than not that additional taxes will be required. The Company hadno uncertain tax positions as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025.
Deferred income taxes are recognized in the consolidated financial statements for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates. Temporary differences arise from net operating losses, differences in depreciation methods of archived images, and property and equipment, stock-based and other compensation, and other accrued expenses. A valuation allowance is established when it is determined that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The application of tax laws and regulations is subject to legal and factual interpretation, judgment and uncertainty. Tax laws and regulations themselves are subject to change as a result of changes in fiscal policy, changes in legislation, the evolution of regulations and court rulings. Therefore, the actual liability for U.S., or the various state jurisdictions, may be materially different from managements estimates, which could result in the need to record additional tax liabilities or potentially reverse previously recorded tax liabilities. Interest and penalties are included in tax expense.
Income tax expense/(benefit) from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 wasnil in each period, which resulted primarily from maintaining a full valuation allowance against the Company's deferred tax assets.
Loss Per Share
Basic loss per share is calculated as net loss to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The number of outstanding shares used for the EPS calculation includes outstanding penny warrants. Refer to Note 8 – Stockholder’s Equity.
Diluted income (loss) per share for the periods equal to basic income (loss) per share as the effect of any stock-based compensation awards and warrant repricing would be anti-dilutive.
The anti-dilutive stock-based compensation awards consisted of:
| · | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | March 31, 2026 | | December 31, 2025 |
| Stock Options | | 1,780,005 | | 1,780,198 |
| Stock Warrants | | 34,596,294 | | 36,630,689 |
Contingencies
The Company accrues for contingent obligations, including estimated legal costs, when the obligation is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. As facts concerning contingencies become known, the Company reassesses its position and makes appropriate adjustments to the consolidated financial statements. Estimates that are particularly sensitive to future changes include those related to tax, legal and other regulatory matters.
Related Party
ASC 850 -Related Party Disclosures requires disclosure of related party transactions and certain common control relationships. The Company discloses related party transactions and such transactions are approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. Refer to Note 9 – Related Party Transactions.
Risks and Uncertainties
Funding amounts are secured by a priority lien position provided under Florida law (see discussion above regarding Florida Statutes, Section 718.116). However, in the event the first mortgage holder takes title to the property, the amount payable by the mortgagee to satisfy the priority lien is capped under this same statute and would generally only be sufficient to reimburse the Company for funding amounts noted above for delinquent assessments. Amounts paid by the mortgagee would not generally reimburse the Company for interest, administrative late fees and collection costs. Even though the Company does not recognize these charges as revenues until collected, its business model and long-term viability is dependent on its ability to collect these charges. In the event a delinquent unit owner files for bankruptcy protection, the Company may at its option be reimbursed by the Association for the amounts funded (i.e., purchase price) and all collection rights are re-assigned to the Association.
Non-cash Activities
Digital assets transferred to digital assets receivable - The Company pledged 174 Bitcoin collateral and 145 Bitcoin related to the Galaxy Loan Facility as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, which was derecognized from the Company’s ending Bitcoin balance, and recorded in “Digital assets receivable, net” on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
Recognition of Galaxy loan derivative- The Company recognized a debt discount and corresponding derivative liability related to the Galaxy Loan Facility at inception and the loan renewal date.
Insurance financing -The Company purchased insurance policies during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 in the amount ofnil and $168 thousand, respectively, using a finance agreement.
Note 2. Digital Assets and Digital Assets Receivable, net
Digital assets consisted of the following:
| March 31, 2026 · December 31, 2025 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin | $ | 9,012,708 | 8,061,303 |
| Tether | 2,195 | 2,171 | |
| Digital assets - current | 9,014,903 | 8,063,474 | |
| Bitcoin - long-term | 2,200,000 | 10,433,035 | |
| Total digital assets | $ | 11,214,903 | 18,496,509 |
| Bitcoin | |||
| March 31, 2026 · December 31, 2025 | |||
| Number of Bitcoin held | 164.2 | 211.4 | |
| Carrying basis - per Bitcoin | $85,673 | $100,863 | |
| Fair value - per Bitcoin | $68,298 | $87,505 | |
| Carrying basis of Bitcoin | $14,067,465 | $21,322,419 | |
| Fair value of Bitcoin | $11,212,708 | $18,494,338 | |
The carrying basis represents the valuation of Bitcoin at the time the Company earns the Bitcoin through mining activities or the cost paid for purchased Bitcoin. Fair value of Bitcoin was determined using Level 1 inputs. As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 approximately 112.7 Bitcoin and 88 Bitcoin, respectively, (with an approximate fair value of $7.7 million) were held in a custody account as collateral for the Company’s loans with SE & AJ Liebel Limited Partnership. Accordingly, the Company is restricted in its ability to use the Bitcoin separately held as collateral in the operation of its business. The Company regularly moves the collateral Bitcoin out of the collateral account when the fair value of such Bitcoin increases and deposits additional Bitcoin into the collateral account when the fair value of such Bitcoin decreases.
The following table presents a roll-forward of Bitcoin for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:
| March 31, 2026 · March 31, 2025 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin beginning of period | $ | 18,494,338 | $14,019,205 |
| Addition of Bitcoin from mining activities | 1,978,180 | 2,273,940 | |
| Bitcoin transferred as collateral for Galaxy loan | (2,375,176) | - | |
| Disposition of Bitcoin from sales | (3,100,216) | (1,204,680) | |
| Loss on fair value of purchased Bitcoin, net | - | (52,704) | |
| Loss on fair value of Bitcoin, net | (3,784,418) | (1,809,976) | |
| End of period | $ | 11,212,708 | 13,225,785 |
The Company recognized cumulative realized loss from dispositions of Bitcoin of $0.8 million and $0.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Digital Assets Receivable, net
In connection with the Galaxy Loan Facility entered into on October 29, 2025, the Company has pledged 174 and 145 Bitcoin, respectively, as collateral as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 . While the loan is outstanding, Galaxy has the right and the ability to use the digital assets at its discretion, including the ability to sell or pledge the borrowed digital assets to third parties. At the conclusion of the loan, Galaxy is obligated to return the same type and quantity of digital assets as those pledged by the Company. As the collateral pledged related to the Galaxy Loan Facility can be rehypothecated, the Bitcoin is derecognized from the Company’s ending Bitcoin balance, and recorded in “Digital assets receivable, net” on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
The digital assets receivable are initially measured upon transfer at fair value and subsequently remeasured at fair value as of the balance sheet date. A decrease in fair value of $3.2 million andnil was recognized within “Loss on fair value of digital assets receivable” on the consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
The digital assets receivable balance was evaluated for possible credit losses, in accordance with ASC 326 - Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. An allowance for credit losses of $3 thousand and $9 thousand are recorded in “Digital assets receivable, net” on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.
A summary of digital assets receivable, net is as follows:
| March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
| Digital assets receivable | $11,883,937 | $12,687,201 |
| Credit loss reserve on digital assets receivable | (3,393) | (9,187) |
| End of period | $11,880,544 | $12,678,014 |
| Beginning of year | $12,678,014 | |
| Transfer of Bitcoin to receivable | 2,375,176 | |
| Change in credit loss reserve on digital assets receivable | 5,794 | |
| Loss on fair value of digital assets receivable | (3,178,440) | |
| End of period | $11,880,544 |
Note 3. Fixed Assets and Intangible Assets, net
The components of fixed assets as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 are as follows:
| Useful Life · March 31, 2026 · December 31, 2025 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mining machines | 9 months - 4 years | $ | 22,518,772 | $ | 22,388,471 |
| Mining site equipment | 6-10 years | 4,984,547 | 4,827,888 | ||
| Building | 30 years | 467,707 | 569,480 | ||
| Real estate assets owned | 30 years | 80,056 | 80,056 | ||
| Furniture, computer and office equipment | 3-5 years | 463,048 | 440,313 | ||
| Land | 525,000 | 525,000 | |||
| Gross fixed assets | 29,039,130 | 28,831,208 | |||
| Less: accumulated depreciation | (19,676,353) | (18,913,858) | |||
| Fixed assets, net | $ | 9,362,777 | $ | 9,917,350 | |
As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, there were approximately 7,500 and 7,200 miners, respectively, located at various hosting sites. The Company’s depreciation expense recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was $0.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively.
There wasnil and $187 thousand loss on disposal of fixed assets during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Intangible assets as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 consist of the following:
| Useful Life (Years) · March 31, 2026 · December 31, 2025 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power and interconnection rights | 25 | $ | 6,578,600 | $ | 6,578,600 |
| Gross intangible assets | 6,578,600 | 6,578,600 | |||
| Less: accumulated amortization | (316,620) | (250,831) | |||
| Total intangible assets, net | $ | 6,261,980 | $ | 6,327,769 | |
The Company expects to record amortization expense of intangible assets over the next 5 years and thereafter as follows:
| Fiscal year ended December 31, · Estimated Amortization Expense | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (9 months remaining) | $ | 197,355 |
| 2027 | 263,144 | |
| 2028 | 263,144 | |
| 2029 | 263,144 | |
| 2030 | 263,144 | |
| Thereafter | 5,012,049 | |
| Total | $ | 6,261,980 |
During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 the Company recognized $66 thousand and $55 thousand amortization expense, respectively.
Note 4. Deposits on Mining Equipment and Hosting Services
From time to time, the Company enters into mining machine and equipment purchase agreements in connection with our Bitcoin mining operations which require deposits to be paid in advance of the respective asset or service being received.
As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company had a total of nil and $2 thousand, respectively, classified as“Deposits on mining equipment”.
Note 5. Investments
Marketable Securities
Our marketable equity securities are publicly traded stocks measured at fair value using quoted prices for identical assets in active markets and classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. Marketable equity securities as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, and activity for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and year ended December 31, 2025, are as follows:
| Cost · Cost of Shares Sold · Gross Unrealized Gain (Loss) · Fair Value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketable equity securities, March 31, 2026 | $37,380 | $ | - | $(2,380) | $35,000 |
| Marketable equity securities, December 31, 2025 | $27,050 | $ | - | $10,330 | $37,380 |
No marketable securities were sold during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.
Note 6. Debt and Other Financing Arrangements
Galaxy Loan Facility
On October 29, 2025, the Company entered into a Master Digital Currency Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Galaxy. On October 30, 2025, the Company made a draw under the Galaxy Loan Facility and borrowed a principal sum of $11 million (the “October 2025 Loan”). In connection with the October 2025 Loan, the Company granted to Galaxy a security interest in 145 Bitcoin owned by the Company as collateral. This security interest was subsequently increased to 174 Bitcoin in the three months ended March 31, 2026.
The settlement amount of the loans borrowed under the Loan Agreement are adjusted based on the Bitcoin price relative to a contractual floor and ceiling market price of Bitcoin (“Collar Feature”), and is cash settled.
On January 28, 2026, the Company extended the Loan Agreement and modified the contractual floor and ceiling market prices of the Collar Feature. The realized loss on the settlement of the derivative liability related to the modification of the Collar Feature was $48 thousand and was recorded within “Gain on Galaxy loan derivative” on the consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026.
On February 27, 2026, the Company extended the Loan Agreement and modified the contractual floor and ceiling market prices of the Collar Feature. The realized gain on the settlement of the derivative liability related to the modification of the Collar Feature was $67 thousand.
On April 6, 2026, the Company extended the Galaxy Loan Facility from April 24, 2026 through June 26, 2026.
The Collar Feature is an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation under ASC 815-15. The fair value of the Collar Feature is calculated using a Black Scholes calculation using Level 3 inputs. Significant inputs for the fair value of the Collar Feature for the January and February modifications include the volatility of Bitcoin observed for a similar term as the remaining term of the loan of 32.4%-55.4% and short term treasury interest rates of 3.5%. The derivatives are classified as a debt discount and amortized over the life of the contract.
The derivative liability of $214 thousand and derivative asset of $48 thousand was classified as “Galaxy loan derivative” on the consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.
Debt of the Company consisted of the following as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025:
| March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
| Financing agreement with Imperial PFS that is unsecured. Down payment of $9,218 was required upfront. Eleven installment payments of $16,743 are to be made over the loan term. The note matures on June 1, 2026. Annualized interest is 9.45%. | 50,230 | 100,461 |
| Financing agreement with Imperial PFS that is unsecured. Down payment of $6,900 was required upfront. Six installment payments of $12,604 are to be made over the loan term. The note matures on June 1, 2026. Annualized interest is 9.45%. | 37,813 | 75,627 |
| Financing agreement with Imperial PFS that is unsecured. Down payment of $50,635 was required upfront. Ten installment payments of $47,553 are to be made over the loan term. The note matures on August 1, 2026. Annualized interest is 8.6%. | 237,765 | 380,423 |
| Secured loan with Brown Family Enterprises LLC. The note matures on June 30, 2026. Interest is 11% per annum. | 1,500,000 | 1,500,000 |
| Loan with SE & AJ Liebel Limited Partnership. $2.2 million of Bitcoin has been pledged as collateral. The note matures on September 15, 2027. Interest is 12% per annum. | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 |
| Loan with SE & AJ Liebel Limited Partnership. $5.5 million of Bitcoin has been pledged as collateral. The note matures on August 6, 2026. Interest is 12% per annum. | 5,000,000 | 5,000,000 |
| Loan with Galaxy Digital LLC. $11.9 million and $12.7 million worth of Bitcoin have been pledged as collateral as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. The note matures on June 26, 2026. Interest is 0% per annum. | 11,000,000 | 11,000,000 |
| Debt discount | (194,051) | (196,259) |
| $19,631,757 | $19,860,252 |
Minimum required principal payments on the Company's debt as of March 31, 2026 are as follows:
| Maturity | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2026 | 17,825,808 |
| 2027 | 2,000,000 |
| $19,825,808 |
Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
The Company leases office space and office equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Leases with an initial term of one year or less are not recorded on the balance sheet, and the Company generally recognizes lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. As of March 31, 2026, the Company’s long term operating leases have remaining lease terms of between 2-28 months and include options to renew the leases. The exercise of lease renewal options is generally at the Company’s sole discretion. The Company’s leases do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. As of March 31, 2026, the Company's long term financing land lease has a remaining lease term of 39 months and includes a purchase option.
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term using either the implicit rate in the lease, if known, or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate for the specific lease as of the lease commencement date. The ROU assets are also adjusted for any prepayments made or incentives received. The lease terms include options to extend or terminate the lease only to the extent it is reasonably certain any of those options will be exercised. Lease expense for operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For finance leases, amortization expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the lease term and interest expense related to the lease is recognized using the interest method. The Company accounts for lease components (e.g., fixed payments) separate from the non-lease components (e.g., common-area maintenance costs).
The Company’s office lease is through July 31, 2028. Subsequent renewal options were not considered probable of being exercised as of March 31, 2026. This office space is in a building owned by a board member. The Company shares this space and the related costs associated with this operating lease with a related party (Refer to Note 9) that also performs legal services associated with the collection of delinquent assessments. The related party has a sub-lease for approximately $2.5 thousandper month plus operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.
Lease expense recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was$67 thousand and $71 thousand, respectively. Sublease income recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was approximately $7 thousand and $7 thousand, respectively.
The following table presents supplemental balance sheet information related to leases as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025:
| Balance Sheet Line Item | March 31, 2026 | December 31, 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | |||
| ROU assets - operating lease | Right of use asset, net | $243,586 | $268,236 |
| ROU assets - finance lease | Right of use asset, net | 427,848 | 460,759 |
| Total lease assets | $671,434 | $728,995 | |
| Liabilities | |||
| Current lease liabilities - operating lease | Current portion of lease liability | $99,294 | $97,852 |
| Current lease liabilities - finance lease | Current portion of lease liability | 99,230 | 96,766 |
| Long-term lease liabilities - operating lease | Lease liability - net of current portion | 152,531 | 178,269 |
| Long-term lease liabilities - finance lease | Lease liability - net of current portion | 422,592 | 412,099 |
| Total lease liabilities | $773,647 | $784,986 | |
| Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years) - operating lease | 2.3 | 2.6 | |
| Weighted-average discount rate - operating lease | 10.09% | 10.07% | |
| Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years) - finance lease | 3.3 | 3.5 | |
The following table presents supplemental cash flow information and non-cash activity related to leases for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:
| Lease Supplemental Cash Flow Table | March 31, | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2025 | |
| Operating cash flow information | ||
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities | $(24,296) | $(25,395) |
| Non-cashflow information | ||
| Accrued interest expense on finance lease | $12,957 | $14,710 |
The following table presents maturities of lease liabilities on an undiscounted basis as of March 31, 2026:
| Lease Maturity Table | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Leases · Finance Leases · Total Leases | |||
| 2026 | 90,172 | 143,222 | 233,394 |
| 2027 | 121,598 | 147,518 | 269,116 |
| 2028 | 72,158 | 151,944 | 224,102 |
| 2029 | - | 181,502 | 181,502 |
| 2030 and thereafter | - | - | - |
| (less: imputed interest) | (32,103) | (102,364) | (134,467) |
| $251,825 | $521,822 | $773,647 | |
Legal Proceedings
Except as described below, we are not currently a party to material pending or known threatened litigation proceedings. However, we frequently become party to litigation in the ordinary course of business, including either the prosecution or defense of claims arising from contracts by and between us and client Associations. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of prosecution, defense, and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.
The Company accrues for contingent obligations, including estimated legal costs, when the obligation is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. As facts concerning contingencies become known, the Company reassesses its position and makes appropriate adjustments to the consolidated financial statements. Estimates that are particularly sensitive to future changes include those related to tax, legal, and other regulatory matters.
Uptime Purchase Agreement Matter
In October 2021, we entered into a sale and purchase agreement (the “Uptime Purchase Agreement”) with Uptime Armory LLC (“Uptime”) to purchase 18 modified 40-foot cargo containers (“POD5ive containers”) for $3.15 million, of which we paid $2.4 million (75%) in 2021 as a non-refundable down payment and the remaining 25% in 2022 upon Uptime’s notice of completion; however, no containers have been delivered as of March 31, 2026. In November 2022, we filed suit in Florida circuit court against Uptime and Bit5ive, LLC (“Bit5ive”) alleging breach of contract and violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. The court stayed the action and ordered the parties to confidential arbitration governed by the American Arbitration Association. We recorded an impairment charge of $3.15 million on our mining machine deposit in the fourth quarter of 2022. The arbitrator ruled in favor of US Digital’s dispositive motions against Uptime and Bit5ive, and we have filed a Proof of Claim in the amount of the arbitrator’s award of $3.2 million (owed joint and several with Bit5ive) following the Defendants’ filing for Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors. The likelihood and amount of recovery of the Company’s outstanding claims cannot be estimated at this time.
Uptime Hosting Agreement Matter
In October 2021, US Digital also entered into a hosting agreement with Uptime Hosting LLC (the “Hosting Agreement”) to host the Company’s 18 POD5ive containers for 6 cents per kilowatt with a one-year term, under which we paid a refundable deposit of $0.8 million. On June 29, 2022, the Hosting Agreement was terminated pursuant to a Release and Termination Agreement in which Uptime Hosting LLC agreed to repay the $0.8 million deposit. We recorded an impairment charge of $0.8 million on our prepaid hosting deposit in the fourth quarter of 2022. In September 2022, we filed suit in Florida circuit court against Uptime Hosting LLC for return of the deposit and other damages, alleging breach of contract and violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. We have since amended the complaint to add claims against additional defendants, including breach of contract, violations of Florida’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act and Florida Fraudulent Asset Conversion, violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, and claims for equitable liens.
CFTC enforcement action
On September 30, 2024, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) filed an enforcement action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, styled Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Traders Domain FX LTD d/b/a The
Traders Domain, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-23745-RKA (the “CFTC Action”). Among the named defendants were Algo Capital LLC (“Algo Capital”) and certain insiders and affiliates of Algo Capital previously involved in state court Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors (“ABC”) proceedings. The Company’s claims against Robert D Collazo, Uptime, Uptime Hosting LLC, Bit5ive, Block Consulting Services, LLC, 6301 Southwest Ranches LLC were under the jurisdiction of the ABC proceedings therefore such claims are now a part of the CFTC Action.
On October 3, 2024, the District Court entered an order granting the CFTC’s motion for the appointment of a receiver (the “Receivership Order”). All assets that are collected from the individuals and entities named in the CFTC action will be remitted to the Receiver for administration and potential distribution under the supervision of the federal court. The receiver is currently in the process of identifying and recovering assets. The likelihood and amount of recovery of the Company's outstanding claims against Uptime, Uptime Hosting LLC and Bit5ive cannot be estimated at this time.
Note 8. Stockholders’ Equity
At the Market Program
On March 27, 2026, the Company entered into an at the market offering agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Maxim Group LLC (the “Agent”), pursuant to which the Company may, from time to time, at the Company’s discretion, offer and sell shares of the Company’s common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $75,000,000 (the “Shares”), through the Agent, acting as sales agent. The Shares to be sold under the Sales agreement, if any, will be issued and sold pursuant to the Company’s shelf registration statement which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 13, 2024 (the “Registration Statement”) and was declared effective on November 21, 2024. A prospectus supplement related to the Company’s at the market offering (“ATM”) program with the Agent under the Sales Agreement was filed with the SEC on March 27, 2026. The ATM program will remain in effect until the Sales Agreement is terminated by either the Company or Agent, with the Company having the right to terminate the agreement at any time upon 10 days’ notice and the Agent having the right to terminate at any time. As of March 31, 2026, an aggregate gross sales limit of $75,000,000 remains available for issuance under the ATM program. Approximately $120 thousand of legal and professional fees incurred related to the establishment of the ATM program as of March 31, 2026 were deferred and recorded within“Prepaid expenses and other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and will be amortized ratably as stock is issued under the program.
Stock Options
The following is a summary of the stock option plan activity during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:
| 2026 | 2025 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of | Weighted Average | Number of | Weighted Average | |
| Options | Exercise Price | Options | Exercise Price | |
| Options outstanding at beginning of the year | 1,780,198 | $3.83 | 593,378 | $9.06 |
| Granted | - | - | - | - |
| Expired | (193) | (3,265.54) | - | - |
| Exercised | - | - | - | - |
| Options outstanding at end of the period | 1,780,005 | $3.48 | 593,378 | $9.06 |
| Options exercisable at end of the period | 959,844 | $5.43 | 386,169 | $11.51 |
Stock compensation expense recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 related to stock options was approximately $331 thousand and $111 thousand, respectively. As of March 31, 2026 there was$0.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost associated with unvested stock options remaining.
The aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding common stock options as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 wasnil. The remaining weighted average life of the options as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 was approximately 8.56 years and 8.83 years, respectively.
Warrants
The following is a summary of the warrant activity during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:
| 2026 | 2025 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Warrants | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Number of Warrants | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
| Warrants outstanding at beginning of the year | 36,630,689 | $0.48 | 4,747,547 | $2.93 |
| Issued | - | - | - | - |
| Exercised | (2,034,395) | (0.001) | - | - |
| Expired | - | - | - | - |
| Warrants outstanding and exercisable at end of the year | 34,596,294 | $0.48 | 4,747,547 | $2.93 |
During January and February 2026,2,034,395 pre-funded warrants were exercised for $0.001 per share.
The aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding common stock warrants as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 was $1.3 million and $3.2 million. The remaining weighted average life of the warrants as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 was 3.44 years and 3.75 years, respectively.
As of March 31, 2026, there wereno warrants that were unvested. All outstanding warrants contain provisions allowing a cashless exercise at their respective exercise prices.
Note 9. Related Party Transactions
Legal services for the Company associated with the collection of delinquent assessments from property owners was performed by a law firm (“Business Law Group”, or “BLG”) which was owned solely by Bruce M. Rodgers, the chairman and CEO of the Company, until and through the date of its initial public offering in 2015. Following the initial public offering, Mr. Rodgers transferred his interest in BLG to other attorneys at the firm through a redemption of his interest in the firm. The law firm has historically performed collection work primarily on a deferred billing basis wherein the law firm receives payment for services rendered upon collection from the property owners or at amounts ultimately subject to negotiations with the Company.
On February 1, 2022, the Company consented to the assignment by BLG to the law firm BLG Association Law, PLLC (“BLGAL”) of the Services Agreement, dated April 15, 2015, previously entered into by the Company and BLG (the “Services Agreement”). The Services Agreement had set forth the terms under which BLG would act as the primary law firm used by the Company and its association clients for the servicing and collection of association accounts. Bruce M. Rodgers is a 50% owner of BLGAL.
Under the agreement, the Company paid BLG a fixed monthly fee of $43 thousand per month for services rendered during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The Company pays BLG a minimum per unit fee of $700 in any case where there is a collection event and BLG received no payment from the property owner, including any unit where the Company has taken title to the unit or where the Association has terminated its contract with either BLG or the Company.
The Company had originally engaged BLG on behalf of many of its Association clients to service and collect the Accounts and to distribute the proceeds as required by Florida law and the provisions of the purchase agreements between the Company and the Associations. This engagement was subsequently assigned to BLGAL as described above. Ms. Gould, who is a Director of the Company, worked as the General Manager of BLG and works as the General Manager of BLGAL.
Amounts paid to BLGAL for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 were $129 thousand and $129 thousand, respectively.
Pursuant to the Services Agreement, as amended, in effect during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company paid all costs (lien filing fees, process and serve costs) incurred in connection with the collection of amounts due from property owners. Any recovery of these collection costs is accounted for as a reduction in expense incurred. The Company incurred expenses related to collection costs for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 in the amounts of $19 thousand and $22 thousand, respectively. Recoveries during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 were $7 thousand and $5 thousand, respectively.
The Company also shares office space, personnel and related common expenses with BLGAL. All shared expenses, including rent, are charged to BLGAL based on an estimate of actual usage. Any expenses of BLGAL paid by the Company that have not been reimbursed or settled against other amounts are reflected as due from related parties in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. BLGAL was charged for office sub-lease for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 for a total of $7 thousand and $7 thousand, respectively.
Amounts payable to BLGAL as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 were$65 thousandand $48 thousand, respectively.
Note 10. Segment Information
The Company applies ASC 280 Segment Reporting in determining its reportable segments. The Company hastwo reportable segments: Specialty Finance and Mining and Treasury Operations. The guidance requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the CODM to decide how to allocate resources and for purposes of assessing such segments’ performance. The Company’s CODM uses revenue, income from operations and income before taxes of our reporting segments to assess the performance of the business of our reportable operating segments. Segment asset information is not disclosed as such information is not regularly reviewed by the CODM. The CODM regularly reviews total assets as reported on the consolidated balance sheet. Performance results are monitored, reviewed, and measured monthly and quarterly to assess returns on investment, compensation decisions and changing strategies, if required.
No operating segments have been aggregated to form the reportable segments. The corporate oversight function, and other components that may earn revenues that are only incidental to the activities of the Company are aggregated and included in the “All Other” category.
The Specialty Finance segment generates revenue from providing funding to nonprofit community associations. The Mining and Treasury Operations segment generates revenue from the Bitcoin the Company earns through its mining activities.
| Specialty Finance · Mining and Treasury Operations · All Other · Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue, net | $130,787 | $1,978,180 | $ | - | $2,108,967 |
| Digital mining cost of revenue | - | 1,868,344 | - | 1,868,344 | |
| Curtailment and energy sales | - | (367,595) | - | (367,595) | |
| Staff costs and payroll | 39,640 | 310,644 | 966,991 | 1,317,275 | |
| Loss on fair value of mined bitcoin, net | - | 3,784,418 | - | 3,784,418 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 208 | 640,336 | 189,284 | 829,828 | |
| Other segment expenses (1) | 176,557 | 516,239 | 416,176 | 1,108,972 | |
| Operating loss | (85,618) | (4,774,206) | (1,572,451) | (6,432,275) | |
| Unrealized gain on investment and equity securities | - | - | 14,024 | 14,024 | |
| Unrealized loss on marketable securities | - | - | (2,380) | (2,380) | |
| Gain on Galaxy loan derivative | - | 22,374 | - | 22,374 | |
| Loss on fair value of digital assets receivable | - | (3,178,440) | - | (3,178,440) | |
| Change in credit loss reserve on digital assets receivable | - | 5,794 | - | 5,794 | |
| Interest income | - | - | 532 | 532 | |
| Interest expense | - | (504,484) | (40,687) | (545,171) | |
| Loss before income taxes | (85,618) | (8,428,962) | (1,600,962) | (10,115,542) | |
| Fixed asset additions | - | 203,344 | 4,578 | 207,922 | |
| Specialty Finance · Mining and Treasury Operations · All Other · Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue, net | $97,397 | $2,273,940 | $ | - | $2,371,337 | ||
| Digital mining cost of revenue | - | 1,548,295 | - | 1,548,295 | |||
| Staff costs and payroll | 130,621 | 228,973 | 690,883 | 1,050,477 | |||
| Loss on fair value of Bitcoin, net | - | 1,809,976 | - | 1,809,976 | |||
| Depreciation and amortization | 477 | 1,980,092 | 57,009 | 2,037,578 | |||
| Other segment expenses (1) | 214,883 | 322,061 | 487,908 | 1,024,852 | |||
| Operating loss | (248,584) | (3,615,456) | (1,235,800) | (5,099,840) | |||
| Loss on fair value of purchased Bitcoin, net | (52,704) | - | (52,704) | ||||
| Unrealized loss on investment and equity securities | - | - | (25,984) | (25,984) | |||
| Unrealized loss on marketable securities | - | - | (8,710) | (8,710) | |||
| Interest income | - | - | 1,145 | 1,145 | |||
| Interest expense | - | (183,919) | (36,987) | (220,906) | |||
| Loss before income taxes | (248,584) | (3,852,079) | (1,306,336) | (5,406,999) | |||
| Fixed asset additions | 1,170 | 166,896 | 2,007 | 170,073 | |||
- Other segment items for each reportable segment include rent, collection costs, office and general business expenses, travel and insurance costs.
Note 11. Subsequent Events
ATM Program
The Company sold approximately 74,389 shares under the ATM program between April 14, 2026 and April 22, 2026 at a price range between $0.29 per share to $0.303 per share for a total of approximately $21,500 in net sales proceeds. Certain outstanding and exercisable warrants include price protection provisions requiring a reduction in the instrument’s exercise price in the event that the Company subsequently issues shares at a purchase price, or warrants at an exercise price, lower than the instrument’s original exercise price. As a result of the ATM program sales, this provision was triggered and the exercise price for 16,670,624 warrants was reduced from $0.48 to $0.29.
December RDO Pre-funded Warrants
During May 2026,1,120,000 pre-funded warrants were exercised for $0.001 per share.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.