Bright Mountain Media, Inc.

From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business, including but not limited to, disputes in the areas of contracts, data protection, content regulation, intellectual property, consumer protection, e-commerce, marketing, advertising, rights of publicity, health and safety, employment and labor, competition, and taxation. We record a liability when we believe that it is probable that we will incur a loss, and the amount of that loss can be reasonably estimated.

Ladenburg

On July 11, 2023, Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (“Ladenburg”) filed an action against the Company for breach of contract in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (the “District Court”), Case No. 9:23-cv-81019-AMC. Ladenburg alleges that it entered into an Investment Banking Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Company on September 1, 2020. According to Ladenburg, that Agreement provided that Ladenburg would be the exclusive investment advisor and banker for the Company. Ladenburg alleges that the Agreement entitles them to a fee for any financing transactions (debt financing or merger and acquisition transactions) that the Company engages in during the term of the contract. In April 2023, the Company informed Ladenburg of the impending acquisition of Big Village Insights, Inc. and Big Village Agency, LLC (together, the "Big Village Acquisition"). Ladenburg now seeks $1.5 million, plus interest, costs and attorneys’ fees and expenses as a result of that acquisition and debt financing, claiming that it is entitled to a fee. The Company disputes the allegations and disputes that Ladenburg is entitled to receive any fee since it did not perform any work pertaining to such acquisition. On November 27, 2024, the District Court entered a judgment in favor of Ladenburg and against the Company granting damages of $1.7 million to Ladenburg. On December 26, 2024, the Company filed a motion with the District Court requesting that the District Court reconsider its judgment. This motion was denied on January 30, 2025. Also on December 26, 2024, the Company and its subsidiaries entered into the Twenty-First Amendment to the Credit Agreement with Centre Lane Partners for the purpose of securing a bond to stay execution of the judgment. See Note 10, Centre Lane Senior Secured Credit Facility, to the consolidated financial statements. The Company obtained the bond and a stay of execution of the judgment was granted on February 3, 2025. On May 9, 2025, the Company appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Ladenburg filed a response on July 9, 2025, and the Company accrued an additional $242,000 to cover fees related to this matter. The Company replied to Ladenburg's response on August 29, 2025. On March 26, 2026, the Company and Ladenburg entered into a binding settlement agreement and mutual release. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the Company agreed to pay a total settlement amount of $950,000. The settlement amount is expected to be funded from the restricted cash collateral securing the appeal bond. Following payment of the settlement amount and satisfaction of related obligations, any remaining bond funds are expected to be returned to Centre Lane Partners. The Company recorded the effect of the settlement in its consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2026. The settlement resulted in a reduction of litigation-related accruals and the recognition of a net gain of approximately $1.1 million reflected within legal fees in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026.

Other Litigation

Other litigation is defined as smaller claims or litigation that are neither individually nor collectively material. It does not include lawsuits that relate to collections.

The Company is party to various other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business, separate from normal course accounts receivable collections matters. Due to the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of these other legal proceedings, the Company cannot predict the eventual outcome of these matters, and it is reasonably possible that some of them could be resolved unfavorably to the Company. As a result, it is possible that the Company’s results of operations or cash flows in a particular fiscal period could be materially affected by an unfavorable resolution of pending litigation or contingencies.