Skip to main content

HANMI FINANCIAL CORP

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 27, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Feb 27, 2026

HAFC$32.680.0%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Shareholders and the Board of Directors of

Los Angeles, California

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hanmi Financial Corporation (the "Company") as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans – Loss Rate Models and Reasonable and Supportable Forecasts

As described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 3 – Loans, the Company estimates expected credit losses for its financial assets carried at amortized cost utilizing the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) methodology. The allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) on loans held for investment on December 31, 2025, was $69.9 million. The provision for credit losses on loans held for investment for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $14.2 million.

The Company’s allowance for credit losses methodologies incorporate a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative, that management believes is appropriate at each reporting date. Quantitative factors within the loss rate models are driven by aggregated industry loss rate history and the weighting of various macroeconomic forecast models, which are made up of a number of specific economic factors including unemployment rates, gross domestic product growth rates, U.S. Treasury rates, BBB spreads, and Commercial Real Estate Price Index growth rates. The Company's loan portfolio characteristics are further incorporated as quantitative considerations, including risk ratings, collateral values, delinquencies, and non-performing loans. Qualitative factors are also utilized to adjust the allowance for credit losses calculation for risks not considered by the quantitative calculations. These qualitative factors include the Bank's historical loan loss trends, concentrations of credit, loan policy exception rate trends, changes in lending management and staff, quality of the loan review system, and changes in prepayment rates.

The audit procedures over the loss rate models and determination and testing of management’s selection of macroeconomic forecasts and associated weightings involved a high degree of auditor judgment and required significant audit effort, including the use of more experienced audit personnel and our valuation specialists due to its complexity. Therefore, we identified the auditing of the Company's loss rate models and the selection of forecasted macroeconomic scenarios and their weighting as a critical audit matter.

The primary audit procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

Tested the operating effectiveness of management’s internal controls specific to:

The performance of model validation, including tests of model data, conceptual soundness, outcome analysis, model governance, and model reperformance and replication

Determining the reasonableness of the forecasted macroeconomic scenarios and weightings used in the model

The Company’s allowance committee’s evaluation of the reasonable and supportable forecasts, adjustments, and overall assessment of the ACL

Substantively tested the Company's loss rate models and application of macroeconomic scenario selections, weightings, and related factors including:

Evaluated management’s judgments in the selection and application of the forecasted macroeconomic scenarios

Used the work of our specialists to evaluate the ACL model, including its conceptual design, third-party technical papers, and management’s applicability analysis, model validation, and internal back-testing, and to perform univariate directionality testing

Used the work of our specialists to assist in evaluating the relevance and reliability of data used by the Company’s third-party vendor to develop forecast scenarios

Performed historical trends analysis and substantive analytical procedures to evaluate the directional consistency of the ACL model with trends in observable macroeconomic indicators

/s/ Crowe LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2019.

Sacramento, California

February 27, 2026

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.