Skip to main content

RADIAN GROUP INC

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 20, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Feb 20, 2026

RDN$36.76+0.6%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Mortgage Insurance Portfolio Metrics

New Insurance Written

The following table provides selected information for the periods indicated related to our Mortgage Insurance NIW. For direct Single Premium Policies, NIW includes policies written on an individual basis (as each loan is originated) and on an aggregated basis (in which each individual loan in a group of loans is insured in a single transaction, typically after the loans have been originated).

NIW
Years Ended December 31,
($ in millions)202520242023
NIW$55,166$51,984$52,670
Primary risk written$14,495$13,186$13,533
Average coverage percentage26.3%25.4%25.7%
NIW by loan purpose
Purchases92.1%95.3%98.5%
Refinances7.9%4.7%1.5%
NIW by premium type
Direct Monthly and Other Recurring Premiums96.6%96.4%96.0%
Direct single premiums3.4%3.6%4.0%
NIW by FICO score (1)
>=74066.1%69.6%65.4%
680-73929.1%25.1%28.9%
620-6794.8%5.3%5.7%
<=6190.0%0.0%0.0%
NIW by LTV (1)
95.01% and above16.6%16.1%16.9%
90.01% to 95.00%44.2%38.0%39.4%
85.01% to 90.00%30.2%31.8%29.9%
85.00% and below9.0%14.1%13.8%

(1)

At origination.

Insurance and Risk in Force

Year of origination - IIF
($ in billions) · IIF as of:
By vintage · December 31, 2025 · December 31, 2024 · December 31, 2023
2025$52.318.5%$——%$——%
202442.715.1%49.317.9%——%
202338.313.6%45.316.5%50.618.7%
202247.116.7%54.219.7%60.522.4%
202143.315.3%53.519.4%65.724.3%
202027.19.6%34.112.4%45.116.7%
2009 - 201925.99.2%32.211.7%40.415.0%
2008 & Prior5.82.0%6.52.4%7.72.9%
Total$282.5100.0%$275.1100.0%$270.0100.0%

The primary driver of the future premiums that we expect to earn over time is our IIF, which increases as a result of our NIW and decreases as a result of policy cancellations and amortization.

Historically, there is a close correlation between interest rates and Persistency Rates. Higher interest rate environments generally decrease refinancings, which decrease the cancellation rate of our insurance and positively affect our Persistency Rates. As shown in the table below: (i) our 12-month Persistency Rate at December 31, 2025, was flat as compared to the same period in 2024 and (ii) our quarterly, annualized Persistency Rate decreased at December 31, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024. We believe the decrease in the quarterly, annualized Persistency Rate is primarily attributable to an increase in refinance activity in the fourth quarter of 2025, a result of the decline in interest rates in that quarter, as further described below.

Following three consecutive years of benchmark interest rate increases, the U.S. Federal Reserve initiated its first benchmark interest rate reductions in late 2024, followed by additional reductions occurring between September 2025 and December 2025. Typically, lower benchmark interest rates lead to a reduction in longer-term U.S. treasury rates and result in lower mortgage interest rates and a corresponding increase in mortgage refinance transactions. However, we do not expect these recent interest rate changes will have a significant impact on our Persistency Rate in the near term. As of December 31, 2025, approximately half of our IIF had a mortgage note interest rate of 5.5% or less, which remains below the current prevailing mortgage interest rates based on reported industry averages. If mortgage rates were to decrease further, however, refinance volumes could increase, similar to the effect observed in the fourth quarter of 2025, which could have a negative impact on our Persistency Rate and the size of our IIF portfolio. See “If the length of time that our mortgage insurance policies remain in force declines it could result in a decrease in our future revenues” under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” for more information.

The following table provides selected information as of and for the periods indicated related to Mortgage Insurance IIF and RIF. Throughout this report, unless otherwise noted, RIF is presented on a gross basis and includes the amount ceded under reinsurance. RIF and IIF for direct Single Premium Policies include policies written on an individual basis (as each loan is originated) and on an aggregated basis (in which each individual loan in a group of loans is insured in a single transaction, typically after the loans have been originated).

IIF and RIF
As of December 31,
($ in millions)202520242023
Primary IIF$282,519$275,126$269,979
Primary RIF$74,704$72,074$69,710
Average coverage percentage26.4%26.2%25.8%
Persistency Rate (12 months ended)83.6%83.6%84.0%
Persistency Rate (quarterly, annualized) (1)81.6%82.7%85.8%
Primary RIF by premium type
Direct Monthly and Other Recurring Premiums91.0%90.0%88.9%
Direct single premiums9.0%10.0%11.1%
Primary RIF by FICO score (2)
>=74060.7%60.1%58.5%
680-73932.4%32.6%33.9%
620-6796.7%7.0%7.3%
<=6190.2%0.3%0.3%
Primary RIF by LTV (2)
95.01% and above20.7%19.8%18.6%
90.01% to 95.00%48.6%47.9%48.2%
85.01% to 90.00%26.4%27.3%27.1%
85.00% and below4.3%5.0%6.1%

(1)

The Persistency Rate on a quarterly, annualized basis is calculated based on loan-level detail for the quarter ending as of the date shown. It may be impacted by seasonality or other factors, including the level of refinance activity during the applicable periods and may not be indicative of full-year trends.

(2)

At origination.

At December 31, 2025, 91% of our total Primary Mortgage RIF are Monthly and Other Recurring Premium Policies. Based on the current composition of our mortgage insurance portfolio, with Monthly Premium Policies comprising a much larger proportion of our total portfolio than Single Premium Policies, an increase in IIF generally has a corresponding positive impact on premiums earned, while a decrease in IIF generally has a corresponding negative impact on premiums earned. Reductions in IIF through cancellations of our insurance policies as a result of prepayments, as well as other insurance policy terminations such as Rescissions of coverage and claims paid, generally have a negative effect on premiums earned over time.

The following table provides our direct Primary Mortgage Insurance RIF by year of origination and selected information related to that risk as of the dates indicated.

Year of origination - RIF
December 31,
2025 · 2024
($ in millions)RIFNumber of DefaultsDelinquency RatePercentage of Reserve for LossesRIFNumber of DefaultsDelinquency RatePercentage of Reserve for Losses
2025$13,7574530.3%1.2%$———%—%
202410,8651,8261.5%7.3%12,5165850.4%1.7%
20239,9162,8532.4%13.9%11,6772,1171.6%9.4%
202212,4444,5033.0%24.6%14,1214,1812.5%23.2%
202112,0674,1892.7%18.6%14,4134,1242.2%19.9%
20207,4582,0441.8%7.4%9,3022,2151.6%8.9%
2009 - 20196,7345,9984.2%17.1%8,3957,0084.0%23.7%
2008 and prior1,4633,3647.9%9.9%1,6503,8258.1%13.2%
Total$74,70425,230100.0%$72,07424,055100.0%

Historical loan performance data indicates that credit scores and underwriting quality are key drivers of credit performance, and loan originations after 2008 have consisted primarily of high credit quality loans with significantly better credit performance than loans originated during 2008 and prior periods.

The following table illustrates the trends of our cumulative incurred loss ratios by year of origination and development year.

Cumulative incurred loss ratio by vintage (1)
VintageDec2016Dec2017Dec2018Dec2019Dec 2020 (2)Dec 2021 (2)Dec2022Dec2023Dec2024Dec2025
20162.9%5.0%4.8%4.7%9.7%8.0%3.7%2.7%2.1%1.9%
20174.7%5.1%6.1%14.3%11.9%5.1%3.7%2.9%2.5%
20183.0%6.4%22.8%19.0%7.2%4.9%3.9%3.5%
20192.8%35.6%23.5%6.8%4.6%3.5%3.1%
202025.6%14.9%6.0%3.8%3.1%2.7%
20217.9%10.9%9.1%8.0%7.3%
20229.4%15.2%17.0%17.6%
20237.1%12.6%14.6%
20246.9%11.2%
20255.6%

(1)

Represents inception-to-date losses incurred as a percentage of net premiums earned.

(2)

Losses incurred in 2020 and 2021 across all vintages were elevated due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Geographic Dispersion

The following table provides, as of the dates indicated, the percentage of our direct Primary Mortgage Insurance RIF and the associated percentage of our mortgage insurance reserve for losses (by location of property) for the top 10 states in the U.S. (as measured by our direct Primary Mortgage Insurance RIF as of December 31, 2025).

Top 10 U.S. states - RIF
December 31,
20252024
Top 10 StatesRIFReserve for LossesRIFReserve for Losses
Texas10.5%12.8%10.3%11.8%
California8.0%8.8%8.3%8.9%
Florida5.5%8.0%5.5%8.4%
Illinois5.0%5.8%5.1%5.8%
Virginia4.3%2.5%4.4%2.5%
Maryland3.9%4.2%3.9%3.4%
Colorado3.8%2.7%3.7%2.2%
Washington3.8%2.4%3.7%1.8%
Pennsylvania3.7%3.0%3.7%3.2%
New York3.6%6.3%3.9%7.1%
Total52.1%56.5%52.5%55.1%

The following table provides, as of the dates indicated, the percentage of our direct Primary Mortgage Insurance RIF and the associated percentage of our mortgage insurance reserve for losses (by location of property) for the top 10 Core Based Statistical Areas, referred to as “CBSAs,” in the U.S. (as measured by our direct Primary Mortgage Insurance RIF as of December 31, 2025).

Top 10 Core Based Statistical Areas - RIF
December 31,
20252024
Top 10 CBSAs (1)RIFReserve for LossesRIFReserve for Losses
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ4.6%7.6%5.0%8.9%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN4.5%5.2%4.7%5.5%
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV4.2%4.0%4.4%3.5%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX3.4%4.8%3.4%3.9%
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX3.0%4.1%3.0%4.3%
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD2.6%2.1%2.7%2.4%
Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO2.5%1.7%2.4%1.5%
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA2.2%1.3%2.2%1.0%
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI2.1%1.9%2.2%1.8%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA2.1%2.5%2.3%2.2%
Total31.2%35.2%32.3%35.0%

(1)

CBSAs are metropolitan areas and may include a portion of adjoining states as noted above.

Risk Distribution

We use third-party reinsurance in our Mortgage Insurance business as part of our risk distribution strategy, including to manage our capital position and risk profile.

The impact of these programs on our financial results will vary depending on the level of ceded RIF, as well as the levels of prepayments and incurred losses on the reinsured portfolios, among other factors. See “Key Factors Affecting Our

Results—Mortgage Insurance—Risk Distribution” and Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our reinsurance transactions.

The following table provides information about the amounts by which Radian Guaranty’s reinsurance programs reduced its Minimum Required Assets as of the dates indicated.

PMIERs benefit from risk distribution
December 31,
($ in thousands)202520242023
PMIERs impact - reduction in Minimum Required Assets
QSR Program$913,212$745,197$614,796
XOL Program
Traditional reinsurance agreements479,501160,742218,294
Mortgage insurance-linked notes program388,983558,939770,335
Total XOL Program868,484719,681988,629
Total PMIERs impact$1,781,696$1,464,878$1,603,425
Percentage of gross Minimum Required Assets31.8%27.4%30.6%

See “Results of Operations—Consolidated—Revenues—Net Premiums Earned” for information about the impact on premiums earned from each of Radian Guaranty’s reinsurance programs.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.