ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC.

Report of Independent Regist ered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, of comprehensive income, of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, including the related notes and schedule of valuation and qualifying accounts for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025 appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements"). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

As described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Paragon 28, Inc. (Paragon 28) from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2025. We have also excluded Paragon 28 from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Paragon 28 is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total net sales excluded from management’s assessment and our audit of internal control over financial reporting represent 1.1% and 2.4%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Tax Liabilities for Certain Unrecognized Tax Benefits

As described in Notes 2 and 16 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recorded tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits with a consolidated balance of $247.4 million as of December 31, 2025, of which a portion relates to certain unrecognized tax benefits. The calculation of the Company’s tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in numerous jurisdictions across the Company’s global operations. The Company’s income tax filings are regularly under audit in multiple federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions. Income tax audits may require an extended period of time to reach resolution and may result in significant income tax adjustments when interpretation of tax laws or allocation of company profits is disputed.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to tax liabilities for certain unrecognized tax benefits is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when determining the tax liabilities for certain unrecognized tax benefits and (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to management’s identification of new or changes in information impacting the measurement of the tax liabilities for certain unrecognized tax benefits.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the identification of new or changes in information impacting the measurement of the tax liabilities for certain unrecognized tax benefits. These procedures also included, among others (i) testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the calculation of the tax liabilities for certain unrecognized tax benefits by jurisdiction; (ii) testing the measurement of the tax liabilities for certain unrecognized tax benefits by recalculating these liabilities; (iii) assessing management’s identification of new or changes in information impacting the measurement of the tax liabilities for certain unrecognized tax benefits and evaluating the possible outcomes for these certain unrecognized tax benefits; and (iv) evaluating the status and results of income tax audits related to certain unrecognized tax benefits with the relevant tax authorities.

Acquisition of Paragon 28 – Valuation of a Certain Technology Intangible Asset

As described in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, on April 21, 2025, the Company completed the acquisition of Paragon 28 and the fair value of consideration transferred was $1,276.5 million. Of the assets acquired, $324.0 million relates to technology intangible assets that were recorded, of which a majority relates to a certain technology intangible asset. The fair value of acquired technology intangible assets was estimated by management using the multi-period excess earnings method. Management’s significant assumptions used in the valuation of technology intangible assets included revenue growth rates, obsolescence rate, gross margin, operating expenses, and contributory asset charge rate.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of a certain technology intangible asset acquired in the acquisition of Paragon 28 is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when developing the fair value estimate of a certain technology intangible asset acquired; (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to revenue growth rates, obsolescence rate, gross margin, operating expenses, and contributory asset charge rate; and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the acquisition accounting, including controls over management’s valuation of a certain technology intangible asset acquired. These procedures also included, among others (i) reading the merger agreement; (ii) testing management’s process for developing the fair value estimate of a certain technology intangible asset acquired; (iii) evaluating the appropriateness of the multi-period excess earnings method used by management; (iv) testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the multi-period excess earnings method; and (v) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management related to revenue growth rates, obsolescence rate, gross margin, operating expenses, and contributory asset charge rate. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to revenue growth rates, gross margin, and operating expenses involved considering (i) the current and past performance of the Paragon 28 business; (ii) the consistency with external market and industry data; and (iii) whether the assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating (i) the appropriateness of the multi-period excess earnings method and (ii) the reasonableness of the obsolescence rate and contributory asset charge rate assumptions.

Acquisition of Monogram Technologies Inc. – Valuation of a Certain Contingent Consideration Liability and the In-Process Research and Development Intangible Asset

As described in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, on October 7, 2025, the Company completed the acquisition of Monogram Technologies Inc. (Monogram) and the fair value of consideration transferred was $377.5 million, including contingent consideration. Management estimated the contingent consideration liability to be $211.3 million, of which $201.6 million was allocated to additional consideration to acquire Monogram if certain development, regulatory, and revenue milestones are achieved. A majority of the contingent consideration liability to acquire Monogram related to a certain contingent consideration liability. Of the assets acquired, $131.5 million relates to the in-process research and development (IPR&D) intangible asset that was recorded. The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability related to the revenue milestones was estimated by management using a Monte Carlo simulation method. The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability related to the development and regulatory milestones was calculated by management based on the probability of achieving the specified milestones and considered the time value of money. Management’s significant assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulation method included revenue growth rates and discount rate. The fair value of the IPR&D intangible asset was estimated by management using the multi-period excess earnings method. Management’s significant assumptions used in the valuation of the IPR&D intangible asset included revenue growth rates, obsolescence rate, discount rate, and contributory asset charge rate.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of a certain contingent consideration liability assumed and the IPR&D intangible asset acquired in the acquisition of Monogram is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when developing the fair value estimate of a certain contingent consideration liability assumed and the IPR&D intangible asset acquired; (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to revenue growth rates and discount rate for a certain contingent consideration liability and revenue growth rates, obsolescence rate, discount rate, and contributory asset charge rate for the IPR&D intangible asset; and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the acquisition accounting, including controls over management’s valuation of a certain contingent consideration liability assumed and the IPR&D intangible asset acquired. These procedures also included, among others (i) reading the merger agreement; (ii) testing management’s process for developing the fair value estimate of a certain contingent consideration liability assumed and the IPR&D intangible asset acquired; (iii) evaluating the appropriateness of the Monte Carlo simulation and multi-period excess earnings methods used by management; (iv) testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the Monte Carlo simulation and multi-period excess earnings methods; and (v) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management related to revenue growth rates and discount rate for a certain contingent consideration liability and revenue growth rates, obsolescence rate, discount rate, and contributory asset charge rate for the IPR&D intangible asset. Evaluating management’s assumption related to revenue growth rates involved considering (i) the current and past performance of the Monogram business; (ii) the consistency with external market and industry data; and (iii) whether the assumption was consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating (i) the appropriateness of the Monte Carlo simulation and multi-period excess earnings methods and (ii) the reasonableness of the discount rate assumption for a certain contingent consideration liability and the obsolescence rate, discount rate, and contributory asset charge rate assumptions for the IPR&D intangible asset.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 19, 2026

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2000.