MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 12, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Feb 12, 2026
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Production Costs
Our major costs of prod uction are fiber, labor, chemicals and energy.
Fiber
General
Fiber, comprised of wood chips and pulp logs, is our most significant operating expense for our pulp segment, representing about 55% of our pulp cash production costs in 2025. Further, fiber, in the form of sawlogs, represented about 75% of lumber cash production costs in 2025.
Given the significance of fiber to our total operating expenses and our limited ability to control its cost compared with our other operating costs, volatility in fiber costs can materially affect our margins and results of operations.
Our mills are situated in regions which generally provide a relatively stable supply of fiber. The fiber consumed by our pulp mills consists of wood chips produced by sawmills as a by-product of the sawmilling process and pulp logs. Wood chips are small pieces of wood used to make pulp and are either wood residuals from the sawmilling process or pulp logs chipped especially for this purpose. Pulp logs consist of lower quality logs not used in the production of lumber.
The Friesau mill and Torgau facility consume sawlogs and waste wood. The Spokane facility, Conway facility and Okanagan facility consume lumber. Sawlogs, waste wood and lumber are all cyclical in both price and supply.
Generally, the cost of wood chips, pulp logs and sawlogs is primarily affected by the supply and demand for lumber. Additionally, regional factors including harvesting levels, weather conditions, insect infestations and increased competition for fiber from biofuel producers can also have a material effect on the supply, demand and price for these raw materials.
While fiber costs and supply are subject to cyclical changes, we generally expect that we will be able to continue to obtain an adequate supply of fiber on reasonably satisfactory terms for our mills due to their locations and our long-term relationships with suppliers.
During the past few years, certain customers have endeavored to purchase products, including pulp, lumber, pallets and mass timber products, that are produced using fiber that meets certain recognized wood certification requirements from forest certification agencies like the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC), the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) and the Canadian Standards Association (CSA). If the fiber we purchase does not meet certain wood certifications required by customers, it may make it more difficult to, or prevent us from, selling our products to such customers. The chain of custody wood certification process is a voluntary process which allows a company to demonstrate that they use forest resources in accordance with strict principles and standards in the areas of sustainable forest management practices and environmental management. In an effort to procure wood only from sustainably managed sources, we employ an FSC Chain of Custody protocol and PEFC certification, which requires tracking of fiber origins and preparing risk-based assessments regarding the region and operator. In the areas where we operate, we are actively engaged in the further development of certification processes. However, there is competition among private certification systems along with efforts by supporters to further these systems by having customers of forest products require products to be certified to their preferred system. Such wood certification standards continue to evolve and are not consistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction or in how they are interpreted and applied. We currently do not expect certification requirements to have a material adverse impact on our fiber procurement and sales. However, if sufficient marketplace demand requires fiber to be sourced from standards that are inconsistent with those in our supply base, it could increase the operating costs for our products and/or reduce the available sources of fiber.
(15)
Germany
With approximately 3.7 billion m 3, Germany has the largest timber reserves in Europe. The principal species are spruce, pine, beech and oak. Many of the German forest areas have been certified according to PEFC or FSC standards.
We believe we are the largest consumer of wood chips and pulp logs in Germany and often provide the best long-term economic outlet for the sale of wood chips in Germany. We coordinate the wood procurement activities for our German mills to reduce overall personnel and administrative costs, provide greater purchasing power and coordinate buying and trading activities. This coordination and integration of fiber flows also allows us to optimize transportation costs, and the species and fiber mix for our mills. We are also party to joint wood purchasing arrangements with one of the largest wood consumers in Europe.
The core wood supply region for the Stendal mill includes most of Northeastern and Western Germany, primarily within an approximate 400 kilometer radius of the mill. We also purchase wood chips from Southwestern and Southern Germany as well as the Baltic Sea region. The fiber consumed by the Stendal mill consisted of approximately 49% spruce, 49% pine and 2% other species in 2025. The Stendal mill has sufficient chipping capacity to almost fully operate solely using pulp logs, if required. We source pulp logs from private and municipal forest owners and from state forest agencies. Our Stendal mill has historically also imported fiber from Poland and the Baltic Sea region.
Our Rosenthal mill sources wood chips from approximately 29 sawmills located primarily in the German states of Bavaria, Baden-Württemberg and Thuringia and primarily within a 300 kilometer radius of the Rosenthal mill. Within this radius, the Rosenthal mill is the largest consumer of wood chips. Given its location and size, the Rosenthal mill is often the best economic outlet for the sale of wood chips in the area. In 2025, approximately 89% of the fiber consumed by the Rosenthal mill was spruce and the remainder was pine. Wood chips for the Rosenthal mill are normally sourced from sawmills under one-year contracts with quarterly adjustments for market pricing. Substantially all of our chip supply is sourced from suppliers with which we have long-standing relationships. Pulp logs are sourced from the state forest agencies in Thuringia, Saxony and Bavaria and from private and municipal forest owners. In addition, the Rosenthal mill buys relevant volumes via imports from Czechia.
In 2025, our German pulp mills consumed an aggregate of approximately 5.1 million m 3 of fiber. Approximately 64% was in the form of pulp logs and approximately 36% was in the form of sawmill wood chips.
Our Friesau mill and Torgau facility are each dependent on the consistent supply of sawlog fiber. Our Friesau mill is located in an area where there is a significant amount of high-quality fiber within economic reach. The wood fiber requirements of the Friesau mill and Torgau facility are met primarily through open market purchases and contract purchases from state forestry agencies and private and municipal forest owners.
In Germany, over the last several years, the price and supply of wood chips has been affected from time to time by increasing demand from alternative or renewable energy producers and government initiatives for carbon neutral energy.
Additionally, for several years leading to the first half of 2023, there was a material increase in the availability of harvestable wood as a result of beetle infestation of German forests. Generally, beetle-infested wood is harvested more rapidly so as to be useable before deterioration makes the wood unsuitable for its intended purposes.
While such beetle-infested wood increased fiber supply and was available at lower prices in the short-term, such increased harvest levels present challenges in maintaining sustainability over the long-term and result in periods of reduced harvest levels.
In 2025, our per unit fiber costs in Germany increased across our pulp and solid wood segments compared to 2024, primarily due to constrained supply driven by reduced harvest levels caused by lower availability of beetle-infested wood.
(16)
North America
In 2025, our Celgar and Peace River mills consumed approximately 4.5 million m 3 of fiber. Approximately 71% of such fiber was in the form of sawmill wood chips and the remaining 29% came from pulp logs processed through their wood rooms or chipped by a third party. Our Canadian mills’ wood rooms are able to process about 44% of their fiber needs. The source of fiber at the mills is characterized by a mixture of species (aspen, spruce, douglas fir, hemlock, pine and cedar) and they source fiber from a number of Canadian and U.S. suppliers.
In British Columbia, a combination of high harvesting rates during a past beetle endemic, subsequent governmental initiatives to reduce harvest levels and weaker lumber prices in recent years resulted in lower sawlog availability and sawmill activity. This resulted in lower wood chip availability which increased fiber costs in British Columbia.
The availability of fiber for our mills is in large part influenced by the strength of the lumber market. Lumber markets are primarily driven by U.S. housing starts, home renovation activities and, to a lesser degree, demand from China.
In 2025, our Canadian mills had access to approximately 30 different chip suppliers, most of whom are in Canada and, in the case of the Celgar mill, are also in the United States. Chips are purchased in Canada and the United States in accordance with chip purchase agreements. Generally, pricing is reviewed and adjusted periodically to reflect market conditions. The contracts for the Celgar mill are generally for one-year terms with quarterly adjustments or on three-month terms. The chip contracts for the Peace River mill are generally for three- to five-year terms with monthly adjustments indexed to the average pulp price.
To secure the volume of pulp logs required by its wood room and field chippers, the Celgar mill has entered into pulp log supply agreements. Such agreements can range from one-month to one-year terms, with a number of different suppliers, many of whom are also contract chip suppliers for the mill. All of the pulp log agreements can be terminated by the Celgar mill upon seven days’ written notice. The Celgar mill also bids on British Columbia timber sales from time to time.
Peace River holds two 20-year renewable governmental forest management agreements and three deciduous timber allocations in Alberta with an aggregate allowable annual cut of approximately 2.9 million m 3 of hardwood, of which it currently harvests approximately 44%, and 375,000 m 3 of softwood, which it sells or trades to sawmills surrounding the Peace River mill in exchange for wood chips. The forest management agreements were last renewed for a 20-year term expiring in 2029. While our Peace River mill can satisfy all of its hardwood fiber requirements from its forest management agreements and timber allocations, in order to optimize its fiber flow, it satisfies a small portion of its needs from third-party owned timberlands. Softwood fiber supply is from residual sawmill chips from local surrounding sawmills.
In 2025, our Canadian pulp mills’ per unit fiber costs increased compared to 2024. This increase was primarily driven by reduced wood chip supply as weak lumber market conditions and incremental government duties and tariffs resulted in sawmill curtailments and permanent closures.
The Spokane facility, Conway facility and Okanagan facility primarily source lumber through open market purchases or short-term contracts with regional producers in the U.S. Pacific Northwest, Western Canada and the U.S. South.
Labor
Our labor costs have increased over time due to inflation in wages and health care costs.
Energy
Our energy is primarily generated from renewable carbon neutral sources, such as black liquor and wood waste. Our mills produce all of our electrical energy requirements and generate excess energy which we sell to third-party utilities and to regional electrical markets. We utilize fossil fuels, such as natural gas, primarily
(17)
in our lime kilns and we use a limited amount for start-up and shut-down operations. Additionally, from time to time, mill process disruptions occur and we consume small quantities of purchased electricity and fossil fuels to maintain operations. As a result, all of our mills are subject to fluctuations in the prices for electricity and fossil fuels. Our per unit energy costs decreased in 2025.
Chemicals
Our pulp mills use certain chemicals which are generally available from several suppliers and sourcing is primarily based upon pricing and location. Our per unit chemical costs were relatively steady in 2025.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.