Worthington Steel, Inc.
For the period ended Nov 30, 2025. Filed Jan 8, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Nov 30, 2025 · Filed Jan 8, 2026
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Trends and Factors Impacting Our Performance
The steel processing industry is fragmented and highly competitive. Given the broad base of products and services offered, specific competitors vary based on the target industry, product type, service type, size of program and geography. Competition is primarily on the basis of price, product quality and the ability to meet delivery requirements. Our processed steel products are priced competitively, primarily based on market factors, including, among other things, market pricing, the cost and availability of raw materials, transportation and shipping costs, and overall economic conditions in the U.S. and abroad.
General Economic and Market Conditions
We sell our products and services to a diverse customer base and a broad range of end markets. The breakdown of net sales by end market for the periods presented is illustrated below:
| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 30, | November 30, | November 30, | November 30, | |
| 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |
| Automotive | 56% | 52% | 56% | 51% |
| Construction | 8% | 10% | 9% | 11% |
| Machinery & Equipment | 10% | 9% | 10% | 9% |
| Agriculture | 3% | 3% | 2% | 4% |
| Heavy Trucks | 4% | 4% | 4% | 4% |
| Other | 19% | 22% | 19% | 21% |
| Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
The automotive industry is one of the largest consumers of flat-rolled steel in North America, and thus the largest end market for us and our unconsolidated joint venture, Serviacero Worthington. North American vehicle production, including production at the Detroit Three Automakers, is a leading indicator of automotive demand. North American vehicle production was down 3% in the second quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2025, while the Detroit Three Automakers vehicle production was flat in the second quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2025.
Our remaining net sales are to other markets such as agricultural, appliance, construction, container, energy, heavy truck, HVAC, industrial electric motor, generator, and transformer. Given the many different products that make up our net sales and the wide variety of end markets we serve, it is very difficult to isolate the key market indicators that drive this portion of our business. However, we believe that the trend in U.S. gross domestic product growth (“U.S. GDP”) is a reasonable macroeconomic indicator for analyzing the demand of our end markets other than the automotive industry. The pullback in U.S. GDP reported earlier in calendar 2025, driven largely by a temporary surge in imports following the announced tariffs by the U.S. government, appears to have reversed. U.S. GDP growth moderated during the first quarter of fiscal 2026. As a result of the U.S. government shutdown in September and October 2025, key economic data including U.S. GDP was not released by the U.S. government agencies and bureaus for our second quarter of fiscal 2026. The absence of this data creates difficulty in analyzing demand in the other end markets. Following reasonable U.S. GDP growth in the first quarter of fiscal 2026, we have seen pockets of stability and strength in some of our end markets and subdued demand in others during the second quarter of fiscal 2026.
Total volume (tons) decreased 4% compared to the prior year quarter. Direct tons sold increased by 13%, of which the Sitem Group acquisition accounted for approximately 2% of the increase. Direct shipments to the overall automotive market and to the Detroit Three Automakers increased by 26% and 30%, respectively, in the second quarter of fiscal 2026 as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2025. Toll volumes decreased 24% in the second quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2025, primarily related to lower volumes out of WSCP due to the closure of the toll processing manufacturing facility in Cleveland, Ohio in May 2025, as well as softening demand from mill customers.
Detroit Three Automakers represented 36% and 32% of our consolidated net sales during the second quarter of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025, respectively. Similar to the past few quarters, we have won share in the automotive market. This reflects both share gains from new programs reaching expected volumes and a return to more normal production levels at one OEM customer that had curtailed production last year. Energy shipments were up over 50% in the second quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2025, largely driven by project-based solar programs. Agriculture volume was up 1% in the second quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2025, as grain bin strength offset weaker OEM equipment demand. These gains were partially offset by softness in construction and heavy truck, which were down 9% and 6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2025.
The following table summarizes the concentration percentage of consolidated net sales for the periods presented:
| Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 30, | November 30, | November 30, | November 30, | |
| (Percentage of Net Sales) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 |
| End Market – Automotive | 56% | 52% | 56% | 51% |
| Detroit Three Automakers | 36% | 32% | 35% | 32% |
| Largest Automotive Customers: | ||||
| Customer A | 15% | 11% | 14% | 12% |
| Customer B | 14% | 15% | 14% | 14% |
While our automotive business is largely driven by the production schedules of the Detroit Three Automakers, our customer base is much broader and includes other domestic automotive manufacturers and many of their suppliers.
U.S inflation rate data collection and releases were also impacted by the U.S. government shutdown. Inflation data was released in December 2025 for November 2025 after skipping data publication for October 2025. During the first and second quarters of fiscal 2026, U.S. inflation rates were stable relative to the peaks observed in recent years, but remain above the U.S. Federal Reserve targeted rate of 2%. The U.S. Federal Reserve lowered the benchmark interest rate twice during the second quarter of fiscal 2026 and once subsequent to the ending of the second quarter of fiscal 2026. The benchmark interest rate cuts were in response to increased labor market downside risks (such as higher unemployment and lower hiring momentum) and cooling growth, while inflation was expected to ease. As a result, borrowing costs have generally decreased, and we expect to continue to benefit from lower rates on our Credit Facility.
We use the following information to monitor our costs and demand in our major end markets:
| Three Months Ended · Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 30, · November 30, · November 30, · November 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 (1) | Change | 2025 | 2024 (1) | Change | |||||||
| U.S. GDP (% growth year-over-year)(2) | N/A | 3.1% | N/A | N/A | 3.1% | N/A | ||||||
| Hot-Rolled Steel ($ per ton)(3) | $825 | $690 | $135 | $841 | $690 | $151 | ||||||
| Detroit Three Auto Build (000's vehicles)(4) | 1,668 | 1,670 | (2) | 3,347 | 3,251 | 96 | ||||||
| No. America Auto Build (000's vehicles)(4) | 3,867 | 3,984 | (117) | 7,752 | 7,712 | 40 | ||||||
| Zinc ($ per pound)(5) | $1.37 | $1.36 | $0.01 | $1.31 | $1.31 | $ | - | |||||
| Natural Gas ($ per mcf)(6) | $3.57 | $2.62 | $0.95 | $3.43 | $2.50 | $0.93 | ||||||
| On-Highway Diesel Fuel Prices ($ per gallon)(7) | $3.71 | $3.56 | $0.15 | $3.71 | $3.64 | $0.07 | ||||||
(1)
Fiscal 2025 figures are based on revised actuals
(2)
Due to the U.S. government shutdown in 2025, certain economic data, including U.S. GDP, was not made available
(3)
CRU Hot-Rolled Coil (“HRC”) Index: period average
(4)
S&P Global
(5)
LME Zinc; period average
(6)
NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas; period average
(7)
Energy Information Administration; period average
Sales for most of our products are generally strongest in our fiscal fourth quarter when our facilities operate at seasonal peaks. Historically, sales have been weaker in our fiscal third quarter, primarily due to reduced seasonal activity in the building and construction industry, as well as customer plant shutdowns due to holidays, particularly in the automotive industry. We do not believe backlog is a significant indicator of our business.
Industry Developments
In 2025, the U.S. government continued to modify its tariff policy, including those related to imports of steel and aluminum among other items such as automobiles and automotive parts as well as universal tariffs. In June 2025, the U.S. government announced tariff increases to steel and aluminum from 25% to 50% under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. While exemptions for certain allied countries remain, many prior country-specific exemptions have expired or are undergoing renegotiation. Other governments, including the Chinese government, have responded with reciprocal tariffs on U.S. imports. Additional measures from the U.S. government as well as other foreign governments have occurred since that time, however, many of the measures on steel and aluminum have remained in place. The scope and duration of these tariffs continue to evolve, which creates sustained uncertainty in global trade policy. As a result, our customers’ supply chain decisions may abruptly shift, potentially impacting our financial performance. The potential for tariff changes in the future has caused some trepidation in markets even while having some time to adapt with the current tariffs imposed. Recent evidence suggests that imports of steel have decreased. While lower imports of steel may put upward pressure on prices of domestic steel and steel products, the ultimate impact tariffs will have on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows remains to be determined.
In July 2025, the U.S. government enacted the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) into law, which ushers in a broad set of changes to the U.S. law and regulatory environments. The ultimate impact the OBBBA will have on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows remains to be determined. However, we expect to realize cash tax savings in fiscal year 2026 due to the bonus depreciation and domestic research and development expense provisions. There is currently no expected material impact to tax expense.
Impact of Raw Material Prices
Our principal raw material is flat-rolled steel, including electrical steel, which we purchase in coils from primary steel producers. The steel industry has been cyclical, and at times availability and pricing can be volatile due to a number of factors beyond our control. This volatility can significantly affect our steel costs. In an environment of increasing prices for steel and other raw materials, competitive conditions may impact how much of the price increases we can pass on to our customers. To the extent we are able to pass future price increases in raw materials to our customers, this could positively affect our financial results leading to inventory holding gains. To the extent we are unable to pass future price increases in raw materials to our customers, our financial results could be adversely affected. Also, if steel prices decrease, in general, competitive conditions may impact how quickly we must reduce our prices to our customers, and we could be forced to use higher-priced raw materials already in our inventory to complete orders for which the selling prices have decreased, which results in inventory holding losses. Declining steel prices could also require us to write down the value of our inventories to reflect current market pricing. Industry consolidation in recent years has reduced the number of steel suppliers, and further consolidation could make it more difficult or costly to obtain alternate supply in the event of a disruption.
The market price of our products is closely correlated to the price of HRC, which is largely driven by the demand for steel and the cost of raw materials. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, steel prices continued their rise before falling slightly in the first quarter of fiscal 2026. Prices fell slightly from the first quarter of fiscal 2026 to the second quarter of fiscal 2026, while the average was higher than for the same period in the prior year. Direct spreads, up $6.5 million, were impacted by a $6.2 million favorable change from an estimated $13.4 million inventory holding loss in the prior year quarter to an estimated $7.2 million inventory holding loss in the second quarter of fiscal 2026. With the recent steel price movements, we expect inventory holding gains and losses will fall within a range of a pre-tax gain of $3.0 million to a pre-tax loss of $3.0 million loss in the third quarter of fiscal 2026.
To manage our exposure to market risk, we attempt to negotiate the best prices for commodities and to competitively price products and services to reflect fluctuations in market prices. Derivative financial instruments have been used to manage a portion of our exposure to fluctuations in the cost of our raw materials; steel is the most significant. These contracts covered periods commensurate with known or expected exposures throughout the periods presented. The derivative financial instruments were executed with highly rated financial institutions.
The following table presents the average quarterly market price per ton of HRC steel for the periods presented:
| Fiscal Year | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars per ton) (1) | 2026 | 2025 | 2024 |
| 1st Quarter | $857 | $690 | $879 |
| 2nd Quarter | $825 | $690 | $747 |
| 3rd Quarter | N/A | $702 | $1,030 |
| 4th Quarter | N/A | $933 | $809 |
| Annual Avg. | $841 | $754 | $866 |
(1)
CRU HRC Index: period average
No matter how efficient our operations are, which use steel as a raw material, they create some amount of scrap. The expected price of scrap compared to the price of the steel raw material is factored into pricing. Generally, as the price of steel increases, the price of scrap increases by a similar amount and vice versa. When increases in scrap prices do not keep pace with the increases in the price of the steel raw material, it can have a negative impact on our margins.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.