TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD

S-K

promulgated by the SEC requires disclosure of certain environmental matters when a governmental authority is a party to the proceedings and such proceedings involve potential monetary sanctions, unless the Company reasonably believes that the matter will result in no monetary sanctions, or in monetary sanctions, exclusive of interest and costs, of less than $300,000. The following matter is disclosed in accordance with that requirement. On July 8, 2021, the National Green Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi, issued an order against Teva’s subsidiary in India, Teva API India Private Limited, finding

non-compliance

with environmental laws and assessed a penalty of $1.4 million. The Company disputed certain of the findings and the amount of the penalty and filed an appeal before the Supreme Court of India. On August 5, 2021, the Supreme Court of India admitted the appeal for hearing and granted an interim unconditional stay on the National Green Tribunal’s order. The Company does not believe that the eventual outcome of such matter will have a material effect on its business.

Other Matters

On February 1, 2018, former shareholders of Ception Therapeutics, Inc., a company that was acquired by and merged into Cephalon in 2010, prior to Cephalon’s acquisition by Teva, filed breach of contract and other related claims against the Company, Teva USA and Cephalon in the Delaware Court of Chancery. Among other things, the plaintiffs alleged that Cephalon had breached the terms of the 2010 Ception-Cephalon merger agreement by failing to exercise commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize CINQAIR

®

(reslizumab) for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (“EE”). The plaintiffs claimed damages of at least $200 million, an amount they alleged was equivalent to the milestones payable to the former shareholders of Ception in the event Cephalon were to obtain regulatory approval for EE in the United States ($150 million) and Europe ($50 million). On December 28, 2018, following defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, the court granted the motion in part and dismissed all of plaintiffs’ claims, except for their claim against Cephalon for breach of contract. In November 2021, plaintiffs moved to amend their complaint to, among other things, reassert claims against the Company and Teva USA. However, on July 12, 2022, plaintiffs filed a new amended complaint that included claims against Teva USA but not the Company, in exchange for Teva USA’s agreement to guarantee any judgment entered against Cephalon in the litigation. A bench trial for this matter was held in September 2022 and on April 30, 2024, the court issued a memorandum opinion in favor of Cephalon and Teva USA, finding that they did not breach the merger agreement as plaintiffs had alleged. Plaintiffs have appealed that ruling to the Delaware Supreme Court, and the appeal remains pending.

Gain Contingencies

From time to time, Teva may directly or indirectly pursue claims against certain parties, including but not limited to patent infringement lawsuits against other pharmaceutical companies to protect its patent rights, as well as derivative actions brought on behalf of Teva. Teva recognizes gain contingencies from the defendants in such lawsuits when they are realized or when all related contingencies have been resolved. No gain has been recognized regarding the matters disclosed below, unless mentioned otherwise.

In October 2017, Teva filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging that Eli Lilly & Co.’s (“Lilly”) marketing and sale of its galcanezumab product for the treatment of migraine infringes nine Teva patents, including three method of treatment patents and six composition of matter patents. Lilly then submitted inter partes review (“IPR”) petitions to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”), challenging the validity of the nine Teva patents. The PTAB issued decisions upholding the three method of treatment patents but finding the six composition of matter patents invalid, which decisions were affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on August 16, 2021. A jury trial regarding the three method of treatment patents resulted in a verdict in Teva’s favor on November 9, 2022, in which the three method of treatment patents were determined to be valid and infringed by Lilly and Teva was awarded $176.5 million in damages. On September 26, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts issued a decision that reversed the jury’s verdict and damages award, finding Teva’s method of treatment patents to be invalid. Teva filed its opening appeal brief on February 2, 2024 and Lilly filed its responsive brief on April 19, 2024. Teva filed its responsive brief on May 29, 2024, and Lilly’s final brief was filed on July 19, 2024. No date has been set for the appeal hearing.

In March 2024, Teva filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging that Amarin Pharma, Inc., Amarin Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited, and Amarin Corporation plc (collectively “Amarin”) engaged in a decade-long scheme to lock up the supply of icosapent ethyl to prevent and delay generic competition to its branded Vascepa

®

drug product. Teva’s lawsuit coincides with four other lawsuits brought by generic drug manufacturers and purchasers of branded Vascepa

®

alleging the same or similar conduct by Amarin. Teva’s requested relief includes compensatory damages for lost sales and lost profits from generic icosapent ethyl drug sales that Teva could have made absent Amarin’s alleged interference. On May 24, 2024, Amarin filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, seeking to enforce the terms of an earlier Teva-Amarin agreement to settle patent litigation regarding Vascepa

®

, which Amarin asserts precludes Teva from filing the present antitrust action. Teva opposed this motion on June 7, 2024, and Amarin’s motion remains pending. As the lawsuit is still in its initial stages, it is not possible to predict its outcome and there is no guarantee that Teva will be granted its requested relief.

In June 2024, Teva filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. (“Corcept”), and Optime Care Inc. (“Optime”) have engaged in a multifaceted, years-long scheme to stifle generic competition to Corcept’s branded Korlym

®

(mifepristone) drug product, which is indicated to treat endogenous Cushing’s syndrome. Teva alleges that Corcept and Optime have suppressed competition by abusing the patent and judicial systems, entering a long-term, blanket exclusive-dealing agreement that has locked up a key pharmaceutical distribution channel, and making illicit payments to physicians as compensation for prescribing Korlym

®

. Teva’s requested relief includes compensatory damages for lost sales and lost profits from generic mifepristone drug sales that Teva could have made absent Corcept and Optime’s alleged interference, as well as injunctive relief to remove the unlawful barriers to generic competition created by Corcept and Optime. As the lawsuit is still in its initial stages, it is not possible to predict its outcome and there is no guarantee that Teva will be granted its requested relief.

Motions to approve derivative actions seeking monetary damages against certain past and present directors and officers have been filed in Israeli Courts alleging negligence and recklessness, as well as motions for document disclosure prior to initiating derivative actions. Motions were filed with respect to several U.S. and EU settlement agreements, opioids, allegations related to the DOJ’s complaint regarding the COPAXONE patient assistance program in the U.S., and with respect to the COPAXONE European Commission’s investigation. In May 2024, Teva settled the derivative action related to the opioids litigation, which is awaiting the approval before the Tel Aviv District Court.

NOTE 11 – Income taxes:

In the second quarter of 2024, Teva recognized a tax expense of $630 million, on a

pre-tax

loss of $246 million. In the second quarter of 2023, Teva recognized a tax benefit of $16 million, on a

pre-tax

loss of $923 million. Teva’s tax rate for the second quarter of 2024 was mainly affected by an agreement with the Israeli Tax Authorities (“ITA”) as discussed below, and impairments. Teva’s tax rate for the second quarter of 2023 was mainly affected by impairments, legal settlements, amortization, and interest expense disallowances. The

pre-tax

loss in the second quarter of 2023 was revised as discussed in note 1c.

In the first six months of 2024, Teva recognized a tax expense of $578 million, on a

pre-tax

loss of $713 million. In the first six months of 2023, Teva recognized a tax benefit of $35 million, on a

pre-tax

loss of $1,195 million. Teva’s tax rate for the first six months of 2024 was mainly affected by an agreement with the ITA, deferred tax benefits resulting from intellectual property related integration plans, impairments and interest expense disallowances. Teva’s tax rate for the first six months of 2023 was mainly affected by impairments, legal settlements, amortization, and interest expense disallowances. The

pre-tax

loss in the first six months of 2023 was revised as discussed in note 1c.

The statutory Israeli corporate tax rate is 23% in 2024. Teva’s tax rate differs from the Israeli statutory tax rate, mainly due to generation of profits in various jurisdictions in which tax rates are different than the Israeli tax rate, tax benefits in Israel and other countries, as well as infrequent or

non-recurring

items.

Teva filed a claim seeking the refund of withholding taxes paid to the Indian tax authorities in 2012. A trial for this case is currently ongoing. A final and binding decision against Teva in this case may lead to a charge of $126 million.

On June 23, 2024, Teva entered into an agreement with the ITA to settle certain litigation with respect to taxes payable for the Company’s taxable years 2008 through 2020 (the “Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company will pay a total amount of approximately

$750

million to the ITA spread over a

six-year

period beginning this year. The Company has the right to prepay, and amounts paid over time are subject to interest and increase for inflation. Such total amount

includes: (i) $495

million in corporate taxes with respect to the Company’s historical earnings that were previously considered by the Company to be exempt from taxes under the Encouragement for Capital Investment Law; and (ii) approximately

$250

million in corporate taxes, relating to additional disputed tax issues in the aforementioned taxable years. The Agreement resulted in an increase of $506 million in the Company’s total income taxes in the second quarter of 2024, as certain elements had been recognized in previous periods. Additionally, under the terms of the Agreement, it was further agreed that in the future event the Company pays dividends on, or repurchases, its equity interests, the Company will pay an additional

5%-7%

of the amount of such dividends or repurchases in corporate taxes, up to a maximum tax payment amount of approximately $500

million. Any amounts due under this provision of the Agreement will be recorded in the future as incurred.

Teva believes it has adequately provided for all of its uncertain tax positions, including items currently under dispute, however, adverse results could be material.

The OECD introduced Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (“BEPS”) Pillar Two rules that impose a global minimum tax rate of 15% for large multinational corporations. On December 12, 2022, the EU Council announced that EU member states had reached an agreement to implement the minimum taxation component of 15% of the OECD’s reform of international taxation. Other countries have also enacted or are expected to enact legislation to be effective as early as January 1, 2024, with general implementation of a global minimum tax by January 1, 2025. Teva has evaluated the potential impact on its 2024 consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and does not expect Pillar Two to have a material impact on its effective tax rate or consolidated financial statements in the foreseeable future.

NOTE 12 – Other assets impairments, restructuring and other items:

Impairments

Impairments of tangible assets for the three months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023 were $69 million and $11

million, respectively. The impairment for the three months ended June 30, 2024 was mainly related to the expected loss from reclassification of currency translation adjustments in connection with the classification of the business venture in Japan as held for sale. See note 2.

Impairments of tangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023 were $668 million and $21

million, respectively. The impairment for the six months ended June 30, 2024 was mainly related to the classification of the business venture in Japan as held for sale (see note 2). The impairments for the six months ended June 30, 2023 were mainly related to certain assets in the U.S. and Europe.

Teva may record additional impairments in the future, to the extent it changes its plans on any given asset and/or the assumptions underlying such plans, as a result of its ongoing network consolidation activities and its “Pivot to Growth Strategy”.

Contingent consideration

In the three months ended June 30, 2024, Teva recorded an expense of $192 million for contingent consideration, compared to an expense of $78

million in the three months ended June 30, 2023. The expenses in the three months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023 was mainly related to a change in the estimated future royalty payments to Allergan in connection with lenalidomide capsules (the generic version of Revlimid

®

) and a change in the estimated future royalty payments to Eagle in connection with expected future bendamustine sales. The expense in the three months ended June 30, 2023 was revised as discussed in note 1c.

In the six months ended June 30, 2024, Teva recorded an expense of $271 million for contingent consideration, compared to an expense of $113

million in the six months ended June 30, 2023. The expense in the first six months of 2024 and 2023 was mainly related to a change in the estimated future royalty payments to Allergan in connection with lenalidomide capsules (the generic version of Revlimid

®

) and a change in the estimated future royalty payments to Eagle in connection with expected future bendamustine sales. The expense in the first six months of 2023 was revised as discussed in note 1c.

Restructuring

In the three months ended June 30, 2024, Teva recorded $18 million of restructuring expenses, compared to $10 million in the three months ended June 30, 2023. Expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023 were primarily related to network consolidation activities.

In the six months ended June 30, 2024, Teva recorded $

million of restructuring expenses, compared to $

million in the six months ended June 30, 2023. The expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023 were primarily related to network consolidation activities.

The following tables provide the components of the Company’s restructuring costs:

The following table provides the components of and changes in the Company’s restructuring accruals:

NOTE 13 – Earnings (Loss) per share:

Basic earnings and loss per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to Teva’s ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, including fully vested restricted share units (“RSUs”) and performance share units (“PSUs”) during the period, net of treasury shares.

In computing diluted loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023, no account was taken of the potential dilution that could occur upon the exercise of options and

non-vested

RSUs and PSUs granted under employee stock compensation plans, and convertible senior debentures, since they had an anti-dilutive effect on loss per share.

The weighted average diluted shares outstanding used for the fully diluted share calculations for the three months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023 were 1,133 million

shares

and 1,120 million shares, respectively.

The weighted average diluted shares outstanding used for the fully diluted share calculations for the six months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023 were 1,128 million

shares

and 1,118 million shares, respectively.

Basic and diluted loss per share was $0.75 for the three months ended June 30, 2024, compared to basic and diluted loss per share of $0.78 for the three months ended June 30, 2023. Basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended June 30, 2023 was revised as discussed in note 1c.

Basic and diluted loss per share was $0.87 for the six months ended June 30, 2024, compared to basic and diluted loss per share of $0.98 for the six months ended June 30, 2023. Basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended June 30, 2023 was revised as discussed in note 1c.

NOTE 14 – Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):

The components of, and changes within, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Teva are presented in the table below:

NOTE 15 – Segments:

Teva operates its business and reports its financial results in three segments:

In addition to these three segments, Teva has other sources of revenues, primarily the sale of APIs to third parties, certain contract manufacturing services and an

out-licensing

platform offering a portfolio of products to other pharmaceutical companies through its affiliate Medis.

Teva’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), who is the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), reviews financial information prepared on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues and contributed profit by the three identified reportable segments, namely United States, Europe and International Markets, to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and assess their performance.

Segment profit is comprised of gross profit for the segment less R&D expenses, S&M expenses, G&A expenses and other income related to the segment. Segment profit does not include amortization and certain other items.

Teva manages its assets on a company basis, not by segments, as many of its assets are shared or commingled. Teva’s CODM does not regularly review asset information by reportable segment and, therefore, Teva does not report asset information by reportable segment.

Teva’s CEO may review its strategy and organizational structure from time to time. Based on such review, in May 2023 Teva launched its new Pivot to Growth strategy. Any additional changes in strategy may lead to a reevaluation of the Company’s segments and goodwill allocation to reporting units, as well as fair value attributable to its reporting units. See note 3 and note 6.

In conjunction with a recent shift in executive management responsibilities and in alignment with Teva’s Pivot to Growth strategy, Teva decided that Canada is no longer included as part of Teva’s North America segment as of January 1, 2024. From that date Canada is reported as part of the Company’s International Markets segment and Teva’s North America segment has been renamed the United States segment. Teva aligned its internal financial and segment reporting and its reporting units in accordance with this change effective January 1, 2024. Prior period amounts have been recast to conform to the reporting structure for the current year.

On January 31, 2024, Teva announced that it intends to divest its API business (including its R&D, manufacturing and commercial activities) through a sale, which divestment is expected to be completed in the first half of 2025. The intention to divest is in alignment with Teva’s Pivot to Growth strategy. However, there can be no assurance regarding the ultimate timing or structure of a potential divestiture or that a divestiture will be agreed or completed at all.

The following table presents a reconciliation of Teva’s segment profits to its consolidated operating income (loss) and to consolidated income (loss) before income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023:

b. Segment revenues by major products and activities:

The following tables present revenues by major products and activities for the three months ended June 30, 2024 and 2023:

NOTE 16 – Fair value measurement:

Financial items carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2024 and December 31,

are classified in the tables below in one of the three categories of fair value levels:

Teva determined the fair value of the liabilities for contingent consideration based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow analysis. This fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of contingent consideration is based on several factors, such as cash flows projected from the success of unapproved product candidates; probability of success of product candidates, including risks associated with uncertainty regarding achievement and payment of milestone events; time and resources required to complete the development and approval of product candidates; life of the potential commercialized products and associated risks with obtaining regulatory approvals in the United States and Europe, and the risk adjusted discount rate for fair value measurement. The discount rate applied ranged from

8.5

% to

%. The weighted average discount rate, calculated based on the relative fair value of Teva’s contingent consideration liabilities, was

8.8

%. Contingent consideration is evaluated quarterly, or more frequently, if circumstances dictate. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are recorded in the consolidated statements of income. Significant changes in unobservable inputs, mainly the probability of success and cash flows projected, could result in material changes to the contingent consideration liabilities. A change of the discount rate by

% would have not resulted in material changes to the contingent consideration liabilities.

The investment in convertible bond security is accounted for as available for sale with changes in fair value reflected in other comprehensive income. As of June 30, 2024, the conversion option had no value. See Alvotech transaction under note 2.

The following table summarizes the activity for the financial assets and liabilities where fair value measurements are estimated utilizing Level 3 inputs:

Financial instruments not measured at fair value

Financial instruments measured on a basis other than fair value m

ostly co

nsist of senior notes, sustainability-linked senior notes and convertible senior debentures (see note 7) and are presented in the table below in terms of fair value (level 1 inputs):