Skip to main content

ODYSSEY MARINE EXPLORATION INC

For the period ended Dec 31, 2023. Filed May 17, 2024.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2023 · Filed May 17, 2024

OMEX$10.31-4.1%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

The following documents are filed as part of this Comprehensive Form 10-K:

1.Consolidated Financial Statements See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” on page 40.
All other schedules have been omitted because the required information is not significant or is included in the financial statements or notes thereto, or is not applicable.
2.Exhibits
The Exhibits listed in the Exhibits Index, which appears immediately following the signature page and is incorporated herein by reference, are filed as part of this Comprehensive Form 10-K.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ODYSSEY MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.

PAGE
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID: 248)38
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets42
Consolidated Statements of Operations43
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity/(Deficit)44
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows45
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements48

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc.

Opinion on the financial statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. (a Nevada corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company incurred net operating losses during the year ended 2023, and as of December 31, 2023, the Company’s current liabilities exceeded its current assets by $26.6 million, and its total liabilities exceeded its total assets by $85.9 million. These conditions, along with other matters as set forth in Note 1, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Restatement of previously issued financial statements

As discussed in Note 2, the 2022 consolidated financial statements have been restated to correct a misstatement.

Basis for opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical audit matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Accounting and Valuation of Litigation Financing

As described further in note 12 to the financial statements, the Company entered into an agreement with a Funder to provide financial assistance in the Company’s claim against the United Mexican States under Chapter Eleven of the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”) for violations of the Claimholder’s rights under NAFTA. The Company determined that the financing arrangement was a derivative and measured at fair value each reporting period. The fair value of this derivative instrument at December 31, 2023 is $52.1 million and is recorded in “Litigation financing and other” on the consolidated balance sheet. The determination of fair value of the litigation financing derivative liability involved a probability weighted present value of potential outcomes, which is determined by management estimates and assumptions. We identified the accounting and valuation of litigation financing as a critical audit matter.

The principal consideration for our determination that the accounting and valuation of litigation financing is a critical audit matter is that the interpretation and application of the relevant accounting literature required significant auditor judgment, and the assumptions used in determining the valuation, specifically the discount rate and probabilities of outcomes involved a high degree of subjectivity.

Our audit procedures related to the accounting and valuation of litigation financing included the following, among others.

•We evaluated the Company’s accounting memoranda and other documentation, including application of the relevant accounting guidance.
•We compared the underlying terms of the International Claims Enforcement Agreement to management’s accounting memoranda and independently interpreted and applied the accounting literature to the transaction.
•We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s assessment of probabilities of outcomes by reviewing publicly available information, discussions with management and legal counsel regarding the status of the case and comparing the model to the legal terms of the agreement. We inspected minutes of the meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of the Board of Directors to search for any contradictory evidence which may indicate that the probabilities used by management might not be appropriate.
•With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we evaluated the appropriateness of the model used in determining the fair value of litigation financing derivative liability. We also performed an independent valuation of the discount rate from external market data and compared it to the discount rate management used in the model.

Accounting for Equity Method Investment in Ocean Minerals, LLC

As described further in note 7 to the financial statements, the Company closed on a unit purchase agreement in July 2023 to acquire a minority share interest in Ocean Minerals, LLC (“OML Purchase Agreement”). The Company currently holds approximately 6% interest at December 31, 2023. The investment is a variable interest entity (“VIE”), of which the Company is not the primary beneficiary, and therefore not consolidated, but is accounted for as an equity method investment included in “Investment in unconsolidated entities” on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2023 as the Company determined it had significant influence over the investee. The OML Purchase Agreement also included other features, including an equity exchange agreement, forward purchase contracts and optional units, which are included in “Put option liability”, “Forward contract liability” and “Option to purchase equity securities in related parties”, respectively on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2023. We identified accounting for the OML Purchase Agreement as a critical audit matter.

The principal considerations for our determination that the accounting for the OML Purchase Agreement is a critical audit matter is the complexity of the agreement and interpretation and application of the relevant accounting literature required subjective auditor judgment given the multiple features. Auditing management’s application of the appropriate guidance required challenging and significant auditor judgment, including the need to involve an internal subject matter expert. There was also significant judgment by management when determining whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

Our audit procedures related to the accounting for the OML Purchase Agreement included the following, among others.

•We evaluated the Company’s accounting memoranda and other documentation, including application of the relevant accounting guidance.
•We compared the underlying terms of the OML Purchase Agreement to the Company’s accounting memoranda and with the assistance of our internal subject matter expert, independently interpreted the application of the accounting literature to the transaction.
•We evaluated management’s analysis of significant activities of the VIE and which variable interest holder has the power to direct such activities. In our evaluation, we considered the purpose and design of the entity, the composition of the board of directors and other legal rights of the parties, including the significance of the decision making rights of each party in assessing which party has the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the performance of the VIE, as well as the substance of the arrangements.

Investment in unconsolidated entity – CIC Limited

As described further in note 7 to the financial statements, the Company has approximately 15% interest in CIC, Limited. The investment is a variable interest entity, of which the Company is not the primary beneficiary and is accounted for as a cost method investment, included in “Investment in unconsolidated entities” on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2023. We identified the determination of the primary beneficiary of the CIC Limited investment as a critical audit matter.

The principal considerations for our determination of the primary beneficiary of the CIC Limited investment as a critical audit matter due to the complexity of the accounting principles related to the determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE and the significant judgment required by management in evaluating the agreement and structure of the CIC Limited investment in determining the primary beneficiary.

Our audit procedures related to the determination of the primary beneficiary of the CIC Limited investment included the following, among others.

•We evaluated management’s analysis of significant activities of the VIE and which variable interest holder has the power to direct such activities. In our evaluation, we considered the purpose and design of the entity, the composition of the board of directors and other legal rights of the parties, including the significance of the decision making rights of each party in assessing which party has the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the performance of the VIE, as well as the substance of the arrangements.
•We compared the rights of each party to underlying executed legal documents and discussed with management the purpose and design of the VIE.
•We evaluated the Company’s accounting memoranda and other documentation, including application of the relevant accounting guidance.

/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2023.

Tampa, Florida

May 17, 2024

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.