ReWalk Robotics Ltd

Except as set forth below, and as disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2024 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2024, there have been no material changes to our risk factors from those disclosed in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our 2023 Form 10-K:

Our business could be negatively affected as a result of actions of activist shareholders, which could be disruptive and costly and may impact the trading value of our securities.

We value constructive input from investors and regularly engage in dialogue with our shareholders regarding strategy and performance. While our Board of Directors and management team welcome their views and opinions with the goal of enhancing value for all shareholders, we may be subject to actions or proposals from activist shareholders that may not align with our business strategies or the best interests of all of our shareholders.

For example, in connection with our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 4, 2024 (the “Annual Meeting”), we received an email from counsel to Creative Value Capital Limited Partnership, which claims to be a beneficial shareholder of our company (the “Shareholder”), demanding that we add to the agenda of the Annual Meeting the election of two candidates proposed by the Shareholder for our Board of Directors (the “Purported Agenda Supplement Notice”). We determined that the Purported Agenda Supplement Notice was invalid, as the Shareholder failed to demonstrate that it owns at least 5% of our outstanding voting power, as required by the applicable regulations in order to nominate a candidate for director and accordingly, we rejected such Purported Agenda Supplement Notice on those grounds as well as others. As a result, the Shareholder filed a legal action in the Nazareth District Court (the “Court”) seeking a judgment ordering us to add to the agenda of the Annual Meeting a proposal relating to the election of the Shareholder’s two candidates for our Board of Directors. The case remains pending, and the Court has scheduled a hearing for this matter on August 26, 2024.

Responding to these types of actions by activist shareholders is costly and time-consuming, and may disrupt our operations and divert the attention of management and our employees. Such activities could interfere with our ability to execute our strategic plan. In addition, a proxy contest for the election of directors at our annual meeting would require us to incur significant legal fees and proxy solicitation expenses and require significant time and attention by management and our Board of Directors. The perceived uncertainties as to our future direction also could affect the market price and volatility of our securities.