NORTHRIM BANCORP INC

1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements have not been audited, and they include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and the wholly owned subsidiaries of Northrim Bank (the “Bank”). Significant intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation. As of December 31, 2024, the Company hadone wholly-owned business trust subsidiary, Northrim Statutory Trust 2 (“Trust 2”), that was formed to issue trust preferred securities and related common securities of Trust 2. The Company has not consolidated the accounts of Trust 2 in its consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As a result, the junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to Trust 2 are reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as junior subordinated debentures.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The Company determined that it operates inthree primary operating segments: Community Banking, Home Mortgage Lending, and Specialty Finance. The Company has evaluated subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure. Operating results for the interim period ended March 31, 2026 are not necessarily indicative of the results anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2026. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. There have been no significant changes in our application of these accounting policies in 2026, except for the addition of the following item.

Subordinated Debt: The Company’s subordinated debt is recorded at its contractual principal amount net of unamortized debt issuance costs and original issue discounts or premiums, if any. The debt is subordinate in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company, as defined in the related indenture or credit agreement. Debt issuance costs incurred in connection with subordinated debt are deferred and presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt and are amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interest method. Interest expense related to subordinated debt includes cash interest and the amortization of debt issuance costs and is recognized in interest expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Common Stock Split

On September 18, 2025, the Company effected afour-for-one forward stock split of its common stock, a proportionate increase the number of authorized shares of the common stock from 10,000,000 to 40,000,000 and proportionate decrease in the par value of the common stock from $1.00 per share to $0.25 per share. All share, equity award and per share amounts presented throughout this Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the common stock split.

Reclassification of Prior Period Presentation

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations or total shareholders' equity.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting pronouncements to be implemented in future periods

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”). This updated mandates that public business entities provide detailed disclosures in the notes to the financial statements, breaking down specific expense categories such as purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, intangible asset amortization, and depreciation, depletion, and amortization recognized as part of oil- and gas-producing activities included in each relevant expense cation. The objective is to enhance transparency, enabling investors to gain a clearer understanding of the nature and impact of these expenses on the Company's financial performance. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and may be applied on a prospective or retrospective basis. The Company intends to adopt ASU 2024-03 prospectively and does not believe that the adoption will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025‑08, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans (“ASU 2025-08”). The amendments in ASU 2025‑08 are intended to simplify and improve the accounting for acquired loans under the Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) model by expanding the use of the “gross‑up” approach currently applied only to purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) assets. Under prior generally accepted accounting principles, entities were required to distinguish between PCD and non‑PCD acquired loans, resulting in differing Day 1 accounting and concerns about complexity, comparability, and perceived double‑counting of credit losses for non‑PCD loans. ASU 2025‑08 creates a new category of “purchased seasoned loans,” defined as acquired loans—in a business combination or acquired more than 90 days after origination—other than credit cards, that meet certain criteria. These loans must now be accounted for using the gross‑up approach. This method requires an entity to recognize an allowance for expected credit losses at the acquisition date with a corresponding increase to the loan’s amortized cost basis, eliminating Day 1 credit loss expense while reducing subsequent interest income. Existing guidance for PCD assets remains unchanged. ASU 2025‑08 is effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and must be applied prospectively to loans acquired after the adoption date. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025‑08 but does not expect the adoption to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2025, FASB issued ASU 2025‑09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements (“ASU 2025‑09”). The amendments in ASU 2025‑09 clarify and expand certain aspects of hedge accounting to better align financial reporting with the economics of an entity’s risk‑management activities. The ASU addresses stakeholder feedback following the implementation of prior hedge accounting guidance and issues arising from the global transition away from LIBOR. The amendments include targeted improvements across several areas of hedge accounting. Among the key changes, ASU 2025‑09 (i) expands the ability to aggregate forecasted transactions with similar risk exposures in cash flow hedges, (ii) introduces a model that facilitates hedge accounting for forecasted interest payments on “choose‑your‑rate” debt instruments, (iii) broadens hedge accounting for forecasted purchases and sales of nonfinancial assets, and (iv) updates guidance related to net written options used as hedging instruments. These improvements are intended to reduce complexity, increase consistency, and enhance the decision‑usefulness of hedge accounting outcomes. ASU 2025‑09 is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025‑09 and does not expect the adoption to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025‑11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow‑Scope Improvements (“ASU 2025‑11”). The amendments are intended to improve the clarity and navigability of interim reporting requirements within Topic 270 by clarifying when interim reporting guidance applies, enhancing the organization of required interim disclosures, and specifying the form and content of interim financial statements. The guidance responds to stakeholder feedback that existing interim reporting requirements were difficult to navigate because of the historical origins and accumulated amendments within Topic 270. ASU 2025‑11 adds a disclosure principle requiring entities to disclose events that occur after the end of the most recent annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. The amendments also introduce a comprehensive list of required interim disclosures drawn from various Codification topics and clarify the presentation requirements for interim financial statements, including condensed financial statements and accompanying footnotes. Importantly, the ASU does not change the fundamental nature of interim reporting nor expand or reduce existing disclosure requirements; rather, it improves clarity and consistency across entities that issue interim financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. ASU 2025‑11 is effective for the Company for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted, and the amendments may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025‑11 and does not expect the adoption to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025‑12, Codification Improvements (“ASU 2025‑12”). This Update is part of the FASB’s ongoing project to address stakeholder‑identified issues in the Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments consist of technical corrections, clarifications, and other incremental improvements intended to enhance the clarity, consistency, and usability of U.S. GAAP. These Codification improvements are not expected to significantly affect current accounting practices or impose substantial costs on most entities. The amendments span a wide range of Topics and include clarifications to diluted earnings‑per‑share calculations, updates to disclosure requirements for certain lease receivables, refinements to the calculation of reference amounts for beneficial interests, clarification of permissible methods for treasury stock retirements, and guidance regarding the transfer and measurement of receivables arising from contracts with customers. Although the updates are largely non‑substantive, certain clarifications may affect how entities apply existing guidance where the prior Codification language was ambiguous or inconsistent. ASU 2025‑12 is effective for the Company for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025‑12 and does not expect the adoption to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

2. Investment Securities

Marketable Equity Securities

The Company held marketable equity securities with fair values of $10.1 million at March 31, 2026 and $8.4 million at December 31, 2025, respectively. The realized and unrealized gains (losses) recognized on marketable equity securities in other operating income in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income were as follows:

Debt securities

Debt securities have been classified in the financial statements as available for sale or held to maturity. The following table summarizes the amortized cost, estimated fair value, and the Allowance for Credit Losses (“ACL”) of debt securities and the corresponding amounts of gross unrealized gains and losses of available-for-sale securities recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and gross unrecognized gains and losses of held to maturity securities at the periods indicated:

Gross unrealized losses on available for sale securities and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 were as follows:

Management evaluates available for sale debt securities and securities held to maturity in unrealized loss positions to determine whether the impairment is due to credit-related factors or noncredit-related factors. Consideration is given to the extent to which the fair value is less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

At March 31, 2026, the Company had 16 available for sale securities in an unrealized loss position without an ACL that have been in a loss position for less than twelve months. There were 22 available for sale securities without an ACL with unrealized losses at March 31, 2026 that have been in a loss position for more than twelve months. At March 31, 2026, the Company hadtwo held to maturity securities in an unrealized loss position without an ACL that have been in a loss position for more than twelve months. There wasone held to maturity security without an ACL with an unrealized loss at March 31, 2026 that had been in a loss position for less than twelve months. Management does not have the intent to sell any of these securities and believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell any such securities before a recovery of cost. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such investments decline. Accordingly, as of March 31, 2026, management believes that the unrealized losses detailed in the previous table are due to noncredit-related factors, primarily changes in interest rates and other market conditions, and therefore no losses have been recognized in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income.

At March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, carrying amounts of $214.9 million and $210.3 million in securities were pledged for deposits and borrowings, respectively.

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of available for sale and held to maturity debt securities at March 31, 2026, are distributed by contractual maturity as shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

There wereno proceeds from sales of investment securities for the three-month periods ending March 31, 2026 and 2025.

A summary of interest income for the three-month periods ending March 31, 2026 and 2025, on available for sale investment securities are as follows:

3. Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale are comprised entirely of 1-4 family residential mortgage loans as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025. The Company designates loans held for sale as either carried at fair value or the lower of cost or fair value at loan level at origination.

Loans Held for Investment

The following table presents amortized cost and unpaid principal balance of loans, categorized by the segments used in the Company's CECL methodology to assess credit risk, for the periods indicated:

The difference between the amortized cost and unpaid principal balance is net deferred origination fees totaling $9.6 million at March 31, 2026 and $10.2 million at December 31, 2025.

Accrued interest on loans, which is excluded from the amortized cost of loans held for investment, totaled $11.1 million and $9.6 million at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, and is included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Allowance for Credit Losses

The table below presents activity in the ACL related to loans held for investment for the periods indicated.

The following table shows gross charge-offs by year of loan origination for the periods indicated:

Credit Quality Information

As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management utilizes a loan risk grading system called the Asset Quality Rating (“AQR”) system to assign a risk classification to each of its loans. The risk classification is a dual rating system that contemplates both probability of default and risk of loss given default. Loans are graded on a scale of 1 to 10 and, loans graded 1 – 6 are considered “pass” grade loans. Loans graded 7 or higher are considered “criticized” loans. A description of the general characteristics of the AQR risk classifications are as follows:

Pass grade loans – 1 through 6: The borrower demonstrates sufficient cash flow to fund debt service, including acceptable profit margins, cash flows, liquidity and other balance sheet ratios. Historic and projected performance indicates that the borrower is able to meet obligations under most economic circumstances. The borrower has competent management with an acceptable track record. The category does not include loans with undue or unwarranted credit risks that constitute identifiable weaknesses.

Criticized loans:

Special Mention – 7: A “special mention” credit has weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset at some future date.

Substandard – 8: A “substandard” credit is inadequately protected by the current worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – 9: An asset classified “doubtful” has all the weaknesses inherent in one that is classified "substandard-8" with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently known facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The loan has substandard characteristics, and available information suggests that it is unlikely that the loan will be repaid in its entirety.

Loss – 10: An asset classified “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance on the books is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless asset, even though partial recovery may be affected in the future.

The following tables present the Company's portfolio of risk-rated loans by grade and by year of origination. Management considers the guidance in ASC 310-20 when determining whether a modification, extension, or renewal of loan constitutes a current period origination. Generally, current period renewals of credit are re-underwritten at the point of renewal and considered current period originations for purposes of the table below.

Past Due Loans: The following tables present an aging of contractually past due loans as of the periods presented:

Nonaccrual loans: Nonaccrual loans net of government guarantees totaled $14.2 million and $12.0 million at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. The following table presents loans on nonaccrual status and loans on nonaccrual status for the periods presented for which there was no related ACL. All loans with no ACL are individually evaluated for credit losses in the Company's CECL methodology.

There wasno interest on nonaccrual loans reversed through interest income during the three-month periods ending March 31, 2026 or March 31, 2025.

There was no interest earned on nonaccrual loans with a principal balance during thethree-month periods ending March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025. However, the Company recognized interest income of $68,000 and $42,000 in the three-month periods ending March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, related to interest collected on nonaccrual loans whose principal had been paid down to zero.

Loan Modifications: The Company modifies loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty as a normal part of our business. These modifications include providing term extensions/modifications, payment modifications, interest rate modifications, or, on rare occasions, principal forgiveness. When principal forgiveness is provided, the amount of forgiveness is charged-off against the ACL. The Company may provide multiple types of concessions on any one loan.

The following table shows the amortized cost basis of the loans that were both experiencing financial difficulty and modified during the periods indicated, by class and type of modification. The percentage of the amortized cost basis of loans that were modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty as compared to the amortized cost basis of each class of financing receivable is also presented below:

The Company hasno outstanding unfunded commitments to the borrowers included in the previous table.

The following table presents the financial effect of the loan modifications presented above to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty as of the dates indicated:

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty as of the dates indicated. These are loans that have been modified within twelve months of the dates indicated:

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of loans that had a payment default during the periods indicated and were modified in the twelve months before default to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty:

The Company monitors the performance of loans that are modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty to understand the effectiveness of its modification efforts. The following table presents the payment performance of loans that have been modified in the last twelve months as of the date indicated:

Upon the Company's determination that a modified loan (or a portion of a loan) has subsequently been deemed uncollectible, the loan (or a portion of the loan) is written off. Therefore, the amortized cost basis of the loan is reduced by the uncollectible amount and the ACL is adjusted by the same amount.

4. Purchased Receivables

Purchased receivables are carried at their principal amount outstanding, net of an ACL, and have a maturity of less thanone year. Income on purchased receivables is accrued and recognized on the principal amount outstanding using an effective interest method except when management believes doubt exists as to the collectability of the income or principal. There wereno nonperforming purchased receivables as of March 31, 2026 and there wasone nonperforming purchased receivable with a balance of $67,000 as of December 31, 2025 for which management was not accruing income.

The following table summarizes the components of net purchased receivables for the dates indicated:

The following table sets forth information regarding changes in the ACL on purchased receivables for the periods indicated:

5. Servicing Rights

Mortgage servicing rights

The following table details the activity in the Company's mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”) for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:

(1)Principally reflects changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, which are primarily affected by changes in interest rates.

(2)Represents changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows over time.

The following table details information related to our serviced mortgage loan portfolio as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025:

The Company recognized servicing fees of $1.6 million and $1.5 million during the three-month periods ending March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, which includes contractually specified servicing fees and ancillary fees as a component of other noninterest income in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table outlines the weighted average key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of MSRs and the sensitivity of the current fair value of MSRs to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions as of the dates indicated. See Note 9 for additional information on key assumptions for MSR fair value determinations.

1 Prepayment speeds are influenced by mortgage interest rates as well as our estimation of drivers of borrower behavior.

These sensitivities in the preceding table are hypothetical and caution should be exercised when relying on this data. Changes in value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in the value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the value of the MSR held is calculated independently without changing any other assumptions. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in others, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

Commercial servicing rights

The commercial servicing rights asset (“CSR”) has a carrying value of $2.4 million at March 31, 2026 and $2.3 million at December 31, 2025, respectively, and is included in other assets and carried at fair value on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Total commercial loans serviced for others were $298.4 million and $296.2 million at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the CSR as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 include a constant prepayment rate of 11.71% and a discount rate of 12.00%.

6. Leases

The Company's lease commitments consist primarily of agreements to lease land and office facilities that it occupies to operate several of its retail branch locations that are classified as operating leases and are recognized on the balance sheet as right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities. As of March 31, 2026, the Company has operating lease ROU assets of $11.7 million and operating lease liabilities of $11.9 million. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had operating lease ROU assets of $5.9 million and operating lease liabilities of $5.9 million. The Company did not have any agreements that are classified as finance leases as of March 31, 2026 or December 31, 2025.

The Company entered into a newseven year lease for the headquarters building for Residential Mortgage in the first quarter of 2026. Upon commencement, the operating lease ROU assets increased $6.3 million and the operating lease liabilities increased $6.4 million.

The following table presents additional information about the Company's operating leases for the periods indicated:

The table below reconciles the remaining undiscounted cash flows for the next five years for each twelve-month period presented (unless otherwise indicated) and the total of the subsequent remaining years to the operating lease liabilities recorded on the balance sheet:

7. Derivatives

Derivatives swaps related to community banking activities: Interest rate swaps

The Company enters into commercial loan interest rate swap agreements with commercial banking customers which are offset with a corresponding swap agreement with a third party financial institution (“counterparty”). The Company has agreements with its counterparties that contain provisions that provide that if the Company fails to maintain its status as a “well-capitalized” institution under applicable regulatory guidelines, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and the Company would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements. These agreements also require that the Company and the counterparty collateralize any fair value shortfalls that exceed $250,000 with eligible collateral, which includes cash and securities backed with the full faith and credit of the federal government. Similarly, the Company could be required to settle its obligations under the agreement if specific regulatory events occur, such as if the Company were issued a prompt corrective action directive or a cease and desist order, or if certain regulatory ratios fall below specified levels. The Company pledged $598,000 as of March 31, 2026 and $596,000 as of December 31, 2025, in available for sale securities to collateralize fair value shortfalls on interest rate swap agreements.

At March 31, 2026, the notional amount of interest rate swaps is made up of 27 variable to fixed rate swaps to commercial loan customers totaling $178.0 million with a fair value of negative $8.1 million and 27 fixed to variable rate swaps with a counterparty totaling $178.0 million with a fair value of $8.1 million. Changes in fair value from these 27 interest rate swaps offset each other in the three-month periods ending March 31, 2026. The Company recognized zero and $129,000 in fee income related to interest rate swaps in the three-month periods ending March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Interest rate swap income is recorded in other operating income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. None of these interest rate swaps are designated as hedging instruments.

The Company has an interest rate swap to hedge the variability in cash flows arising out of a portion of its junior subordinated debentures, which is floating rate debt, by swapping the cash flows with an interest rate swap which receives floating and pays fixed. The Company has designated this interest rate swap as a hedging instrument. The interest rate swap effectively fixes the Company's interest payments on the $10.0 million of junior subordinated debentures held under Northrim Statutory Trust 2 at 3.72% through its maturity date. The floating rate that the dealer pays is equal to the three month CMESOFR plus tenor spread adjustment 0.26% plus 1.37%, which reprices quarterly on the payment date. This rate was 5.31% as of March 31, 2026. The Company pledged $130,000 in cash to collateralize initial margin and fair value exposure of our counterparty on this interest rate swap as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025. The fair value of this interest rate swap was $1.4 million as of both March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, which is included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in the fair value of this interest rate swap are reported in other comprehensive income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The unrealized gain, net of tax on this interest rate swap was $1.0 million as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

Derivatives related to home mortgage banking activities: Interest rate lock commitments and retail interest rate contracts

The Company also uses derivatives to hedge the risk of changes in the fair values of interest rate lock commitments. The Company enters into commitments to originate residential mortgage loans at specific rates; the value of these commitments are detailed in the table below as “interest rate lock commitments”. The Company also hedges the interest rate risk associated with its residential mortgage loan commitments, which are referred to as “retail interest rate contracts” in the table below. Market risk with respect to commitments to originate loans arises from changes in the value of contractual positions due to changes in interest rates. Residential Mortgage, LLC (“RML”) had commitments to originate mortgage loans held for sale totaling $85.8 million and $45.7 million at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. The fair value of these interest rate lock commitments was $1.6 million and $923,000 at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. Changes in the value of RML's interest rate derivatives are recorded in mortgage banking income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. None of these derivatives are designated as hedging instruments.

The following table presents the fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025:

The following table presents the net gains (losses) of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments for periods indicated below:

Our derivative transactions with counterparties under International Swaps and Derivative Association master agreements include “right of set-off” provisions. “Right of set-off” provisions are legally enforceable rights to offset recognized amounts and there may be an intention to settle such amounts on a net basis. We do not offset such financial instruments for financial reporting purposes.

The following table summarizes the derivatives that have a right of offset as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025:

8 . Subordinated Debt

Junior Subordinated Debentures

In December of 2005, the Company formed a wholly-owned Connecticut statutory business trust subsidiary, Northrim Statutory Trust 2 (the “Trust 2”), which issued $10 million of guaranteed undivided beneficial interests in the Company’s Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (“Trust Preferred Securities 2”). These debentures qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. All of the common securities of Trust 2 are owned by the Company. The proceeds from the issuance of the common securities and the Trust Preferred Securities 2 were used by Trust 2 to purchase $10.3 million of junior subordinated debentures of the Company. Trust 2 is not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements in accordance with GAAP; therefore, the Company has recorded its investment in Trust 2 as an other asset and the subordinated debentures as a liability. The debentures, which represent the sole asset of Trust 2, accrue and pay distributions quarterly at a variable rate of 90-day CME SOFR plus tenor spread adjustment 0.26% plus 1.37% per annum, adjusted quarterly, of the stated liquidation value of $1,000 per capital security as of December 31, 2024. The interest rate on these debentures was 5.31% at March 31, 2026 compared to 5.35% at December 31, 2025. The interest cost to the Company on these debentures was $138,000 and $154,000 in the first quarters of 2026, and 2025, respectively. The Company has entered into contractual arrangements which, taken collectively, fully and unconditionally guarantee payment of: (i) accrued and unpaid distributions required to be paid on the Trust Preferred Securities 2; (ii) the redemption price with respect to any Trust Preferred Securities 2 called for redemption by Trust 2; and (iii) payments due upon a voluntary or involuntary dissolution, winding up or liquidation of Trust 2. The Trust Preferred Securities 2 are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of the debentures on March 15, 2036, or upon earlier redemption as provided in the indenture. The Company has the right to redeem the debentures purchased by Trust 2 in whole or in part, on or after March 15, 2011. As specified in the indenture, if the debentures are redeemed prior to maturity, the redemption price will be the principal amount and any accrued but unpaid interest.

Subordinated Debentures

In November of 2025, the Company issued and sold $60.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.875% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2035 (the “Subordinated Notes”). The Subordinated Notes were issued by the Company to the Purchasers at a price equal to 100% of their face amount. The Subordinated Notes mature on December 1, 2035 and bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.875% per year, from November 26, 2025 to, but excluding, December 1, 2030 or the date of earlier redemption, payable semi-annually in arrears. From and including December 1, 2030 to, but excluding, the maturity date or earlier redemption date, the interest rate will reset quarterly at a variable rate equal to the then current three-month SOFR, plus 3.48% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears. As provided in the Subordinated Notes, the interest rate on the Subordinated Notes during the applicable floating rate period may be determined based on a rate other than three-month term SOFR. The interest cost to the Company on these debentures was $1.0 million in the first quarter of 2026. The Company incurred debt issuance costs of $1.4 million which will amortize through December 1, 2035. The amortization expense amounted to $35,000 in the first quarter of 2026. Prior to December 1, 2030, the Company may redeem the Subordinated Notes, in whole but not in part, only under certain limited circumstances set forth in the indenture governing the Subordinated Notes. On or after December 1, 2030, the Company may redeem the Subordinated Notes, in whole or in part, at its option, on any interest payment date. Any redemption by the Company would be at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Subordinated Notes being redeemed, together with any accrued and unpaid interest on the Subordinated Notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the date of redemption. The Subordinated Notes are not subject to redemption at the option of the holder. Principal and interest on the Subordinated Notes are subject to acceleration only in limited circumstances in the case of certain bankruptcy and insolvency-related events with respect to the Company. The Subordinated Notes are unsecured, subordinated obligations of the Company, are not obligations of, and are not guaranteed by, any subsidiary of the Company, and rank junior in right of payment to the Company’s current and future senior indebtedness. The Subordinated Notes are intended to qualify as Tier 2 capital of the Company for regulatory capital purposes.

9. Fair Value Measurements

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Investment securities available for sale and marketable equity securities: Fair values are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

Servicing rights: MSR and CSR are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These assets are classified as Level 3 as quoted prices are not available. In order to determine the fair value of MSR and CSR, the present value of net expected future cash flows is estimated. Assumptions used include market discount rates,

Interest rate swaps: The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is determined using standard valuation models that calculate the present value of expected future cash flows. These valuation models incorporate observable market inputs, including contractual terms, interest rate yield curves, forward interest rates, and credit risk adjustments. The Company classifies its interest rate swaps within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Interest rate lock commitments: The fair value of the interest rate lock commitments are estimated using quoted or published market prices for similar instruments, adjusted for factors such as pull-through rate assumptions based on historical information, where appropriate. The pull-through rate assumptions are considered Level 3 valuation inputs and are significant to the interest rate lock commitment valuation; as such, the interest rate lock commitment derivatives are classified as Level 3.

Retail interest rate contracts: Retail interest rate contracts are valued in a model, which uses as its basis a discounted cash flow technique incorporating credit valuation adjustments to reflect nonperformance risk in the measurement of fair value. Although the Company has determined that the majority of inputs used to value its retail interest rate contracts fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of March 31, 2026, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of these adjustments on the overall valuation of its retail interest rate contracts and has determined that they are not significant to the overall valuation. As a result, the Company has classified its retail interest rate contract valuations in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit: The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligation with the counterparties at the reporting date.

Assets Subject to Nonrecurring Adjustment to Fair Value

The Company is also required to measure certain assets such as equity method investments, goodwill, intangible assets, impaired loans, and Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Any nonrecurring adjustments to fair value usually result from the write-down of individual assets.

The Company uses either in-house evaluations or external appraisals to estimate the fair value of OREO and impaired loans as of each reporting date. In-house appraisals are considered Level 3 inputs and external appraisals are considered Level 2 inputs. The Company’s determination of which method to use is based upon several factors. The Company takes into account compliance with legal and regulatory guidelines, the amount of the loan, the size of the assets, the location and type of property to be valued and how critical the timing of completion of the analysis is to the assessment of value. Those factors are balanced with the level of internal expertise, internal experience and market information available, versus external expertise available such as qualified appraisers, brokers, auctioneers and equipment specialists.

Limitations

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Estimated fair values as of the periods indicated, whether or not recognized or recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are as follows:

The following table sets forth the balances as of the periods indicated of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on a recurring basis during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:

There wereno changes in unrealized gains and losses for the three-month periods ending March 31, 2026 and 2025 included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements and there wereno transfers between levels during the three-month periods ending March 31, 2026 and 2025.

As of and for the periods ending March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, except for certain assets as shown in the following table, no impairment or valuation adjustment was recognized for assets recognized at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. For loans individually measured for credit losses, the Company classifies fair value measurements using observable inputs, such as external appraisals, as Level 2 valuations in the fair value hierarchy, and unobservable inputs, such as in-house evaluations, as Level 3 valuations in the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents the (gains) losses resulting from nonrecurring fair value adjustments for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

The following tables provide a description of the valuation technique, unobservable input, and qualitative information about the unobservable inputs for the Company’s assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 and measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025:

10. Segment Information

The Company's operations are managed along three operating segments: Community Banking, Home Mortgage Lending, and Specialty Finance. The Company reevaluated our reportable operating segments in the fourth quarter of 2024 concurrent with the acquisition of Sallyport Commercial Finance, LLC (“SCF”), which resulted in the addition of the Specialty Finance segment. The Community Banking segment's principal business focus is the offering of loan and deposit products to business and consumer customers in its primary market areas. As of March 31, 2026, the Community Banking segment operated 20 branches throughout Alaska. The Home Mortgage Lending segment's principal business focus is the origination and sale of mortgage loans for 1-4 family residential properties, mortgage loan servicing for a portion of mortgage loans sold, and investment in certain 1-4 family residential mortgage loans on our balance sheet. The Specialty Finance segment's principal business focus is factoring, asset based lending and alternative working capital solutions to small and medium sized enterprises, and includes SCF and Northrim Funding Services, which was previously reported in the Community Banking segment prior to the acquisition of SCF.

The Company's reportable segments are determined by our Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Executive Officer, whom collectively are the designated chief operating decision maker. The reportable segments are determined based on information provided about the Company's products and services offered. They are also distinguished by the level of information provided to the chief operating decision maker, who uses the information to review performance of various components of the business, which are then aggregated if operating performance, products and services, and customers are similar. The chief operating decision maker evaluates the financial performance of the Company's business components such as by evaluating revenue streams, significant expenses, and budget to actual results in assessing the performance of the Company's segments and in the determination of allocating resources. Segment pretax net income or loss is used to assess the performance of the community banking segment by monitoring the margin between interest income and interest expense and the efficiency ratio specific to the segment. Segment pretax net income or loss is used to assess the performance of the home mortgage lending segment by monitoring the premium received on loan sales, the margin between interest income and interest expense, and the profitability of home mortgage servicing activities. Segment pretax net income or loss is used to assess the performance of the specialty finance segment by monitoring pretax income and the yield of purchased receivable fees.

Accounting policies for segments are the same as those described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Interest expense is allocated to each segment based on average cash utilized to fund the operations of the segment and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the consolidated entity. Indirect salary expense for activities such as general management, accounting and finance, human resources, compliance, information technology, risk management, and internal audit are allocated based on the average percentage of employee time spent working in each specific segment.

Summarized financial information for the Company's reportable segments and the reconciliation to the consolidated financial results for the periods presented is shown in the following tables:

1 The significant expense categories and amounts align with the segment-level information that is regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker. All expenses are allocated to a segment.

2 Other segment items for each reportable segment include:

Community Banking: OREO (income) expense, net of rental income and gains on sale, director fees, operational charge offs net of recoveries, loan collection and collateral costs, and other miscellaneous operating costs related to community banking activities.

Home Mortgage Lending: OREO (income) expense, net of rental income and gains on sale related home mortgage loans, director fees related at RML, loan collection and collateral costs related to home mortgage loans, and other miscellaneous operating costs related to home mortgage lending activities.

Specialty Finance: miscellaneous operating costs related to specialty finance activities.

1 The significant expense categories and amounts align with the segment-level information that is regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker. All expenses are allocated to a segment.

2 Other segment items for each reportable segment include:

Community Banking: OREO (income) expense, net of rental income and gains on sale, director fees, operational charge offs net of recoveries, loan collection and collateral costs, and other miscellaneous operating costs related to community banking activities.

Home Mortgage Lending: OREO (income) expense, net of rental income and gains on sale related home mortgage loans, director fees related at RML, loan collection and collateral costs related to home mortgage loans, and other miscellaneous operating costs related to home mortgage lending activities.

Specialty Finance: miscellaneous operating costs related to specialty finance activities.