Skip to main content

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.

For the period ended Jun 30, 2025. Filed Sep 29, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Sep 29, 2025

MKZR$0.93-3.1%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Shareholders and the Board of Directors

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mackenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (the Company), as of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes and financial statement schedule III -Real Estate Properties and Accumulated Depreciation (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, theconsolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2025 and 2024, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Purchase Price Allocation for an Acquisition

As described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company acquired a real estate property during the year ended June 30, 2025, which was accounted for as an asset acquisition. The Company records the acquisition-date fair values of all tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets, and assumed liabilities using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis) which utilize appropriate discount and/or capitalization rates and other available market information to allocate the purchase price at their relative fair values. Estimates of the fair values of the tangible assets, identifiable intangibles, and assumed liabilities require the Company to make significant assumptions to estimate market lease rates, carrying costs during lease-up periods, discount rates, capitalization rates, and market absorption periods.

We identified the fair value measurements used in the purchase price allocation of the Company’s real estate acquisition is a critical audit matter are as follows (i) the significant judgment by management to determine the fair value measurements of tangible assets (land and buildings), used in the purchase price allocation; (ii) significant auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in evaluating audit evidence related to the significant assumptions used in the fair value measurement; and (iii) use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing the procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.

Our audit procedures related to the purchase price allocation for an acquisition, included the following, among others:

•With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of critical significant fair value inputs used in the purchase price allocation related to an acquired real estate asset which were market lease rates, carrying costs during lease-up periods, capitalization rates, discount rates, and market absorption periods. The evaluation included comparison of Company assumptions to independently developed ranges using market data from industry transaction databases and published industry reports.
•Tested the mathematical accuracy of the valuation model and performed procedures over the completeness and accuracy of the data provided by management.

Impairment of Real Estate Asset

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate the carrying value of real estate may not be recoverable. If indicators of impairment emerge, the Company assesses whether the carrying value of the asset through its undiscounted future cash flows and eventual disposition, is recoverable. An impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the real estate assets is recorded. The Company utilized inputs from a recent third-party appraisal and potential new leases to estimate the fair value of the property to determine the impairment amount. For the year ended June 30, 2025, the Company recorded $9,500,167 of impairment related to a real estate assets.

The principal consideration in our determination that the impairment of real estate is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management to determine the fair value measurement of the real estate asset; (ii) significant auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in evaluating audit evidence related to the significant assumptions used in the fair value measurement of a real estate asset; and (iii) use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing the procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.

Our audit procedures related to the impairment of a real estate asset included the following, among others:

•With the assistance of valuation specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the valuation methodology and significant assumptions used in management’s valuation models such as future cash flows, associated with the underlying real property, generally over the relevant hold period, risk-adjusted discount rates, cap rates, and consideration of the market where the property is located. The evaluation included comparison of the Company’s assumptions to market data from industry transaction databases and published industry reports.
•Tested the mathematical accuracy of the valuation model and performed procedures over the completeness and accuracy of the data provided by management.

/s/Baker Tilly US, LLP

Campbell, California

September 29, 2025

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2012.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.