SMARTFINANCIAL INC.

Note 1. Presentation of Financial Information

Nature of Business:

SmartFinancial, Inc. (the “Company,” “SmartFinancial,” “we,” “our” or “us”) is a bank holding company whose principal activity is the ownership and management of its wholly owned subsidiary, SmartBank (the “Bank”). The Company provides a variety of financial services to individuals and corporate customers through its offices in East and Middle Tennessee, Alabama, Florida and Georgia. The Bank’s primary deposit products are noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand deposits, savings and money market deposits, and time deposits. Its primary lending products are commercial, residential, and consumer loans.

Basis of Presentation and Accounting Estimates:

The accounting and financial reporting policies of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and reporting guidelines of banking regulatory authorities and regulators. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements for the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary have not been audited. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

In management’s opinion, all accounting adjustments necessary to accurately reflect the financial position and results of operations on the accompanying financial statements have been made. These adjustments are normal and recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair and accurate presentation. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for credit losses, the valuation of foreclosed assets and deferred taxes, the fair value of financial instruments, goodwill, and the fair value of assets acquired, and liabilities assumed in acquisitions. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or any other interim periods. The following unaudited condensed financial statement notes have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Reclassifications:

Certain amounts, previously reported, have been reclassified to state all periods on a comparable basis and had no effect on shareholders’ equity or net income.

Recently modified accounting policies:

During the quarter ended March 31, 2026, the Company transitioned to a new allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) modeling platform used to estimate expected credit losses under the Current Expected Credit Losses model (“ASC 326”). The change resulted from management’s ongoing evaluation of the credit risk management framework and supporting technology and was intended to improve analytical and reporting capabilities and better align the process with the Company’s portfolio structure, available data, and internal control environment. As part of the implementation, management also refined certain segment-level ACL methodologies to better reflect portfolio-specific characteristics, relevant economic factors, and qualitative considerations, while maintaining the Company’s overall CECL framework, governance, and internal controls over the ACL estimation process. Management concluded that the transition did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2026.

Allowance for Credit Losses (“ACL”) – Loans and Leases:

ACL – Loans and Leases –The ACL reflects management’s estimate of expected losses that will result from the inability of our clients to make required loan and lease payments. Loans and leases deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the ACL, while recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are credited to the ACL. Management uses systematic methodologies to determine its ACL for loans and leases held for investment and certain off-balance-sheet exposures. The ACL is a valuation account that is subtracted from the amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loan and lease portfolio. Management considers the effects of past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts on the collectability of the loan and lease portfolio. The ACL recorded on the balance sheet reflects management’s best estimate of expected credit losses. The Company’s ACL is calculated using collectively assessed and individually assessed loans and leases. The ACL is measured on a collective pool basis when similar risk characteristics exist. Loans with similar risk characteristics are grouped into homogenous segments.

Prior to March 31, 2026, the Company segmented the loan and lease portfolio by call code and risk rating. The loan portfolio reserve estimate was calculated using a non-discounted cash flow method for probability of default and loss given default values. This method utilized the Company’s data along with peer data that was regressed against the national unemployment rate. For the contractual term that extended beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast period, the Company reverted to the long term mean of historical factors utilizing a straight-line approach. The Company used an eight-quarter forecast period and a four-quarter reversion period. The lease portfolio’s reserve estimate was based on the open pool methodology which is a simplified process of capturing losses by quarter over the life of a lease divided by the balance of all leases originated. Refer to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, for a detailed discussion regarding ACL methodology.

As of March 31, 2026, the Company began using a Discounted Cash Flow methodology, adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts, for its non-consumer loan segments. This method utilizes the Company’s data, along with peer data which is comprised of banks of similar size and geographical location, that were regressed against the Federal Open Market Committee Summary of Economic Projections for both the Growth Rate of Real Gross Domestic Product and the Civilian Unemployment Rate. The discounted cash flow models estimate the net present value and are compared to the amortized cost of the pool with the resulting difference between the net present value and amortized cost as the initial modeled quantitative expected credit losses estimate for such pools. The consumer non-real estate loan portfolio is reserved using the Remaining Life Methodology. Under the Remaining Life Methodology, expected credit losses are estimated over the contractual term of the loan, adjusted for expected prepayments, by applying a cumulative loss rate derived from historical loss experience over the average remaining life of the portfolio. Loss rates are calculated using a life-of-loan approach and are applied to the current outstanding balance to estimate lifetime expected losses as of the measurement date. The lease portfolio reserve estimate is based on the Static Pool Methodology. Under the Static Pool Methodology, expected credit losses are estimated using historical loss experience from pools of loans or leases originated during the same period and tracked over their contractual lives.

Management considers forward-looking information in estimating expected credit losses. For segments utilizing the Discounted Cash Flow methodology, the Company uses Federal Open Market Committee Summary of Economic Projections for both the Growth Rate of Real Gross Domestic Product and the Civilian Unemployment Rate as a regression tool to determine the best estimate of probability of default expectations. For the contractual term that extends beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast period, the Company reverts to the long term mean of historical factors using a straight-line approach. The Company uses a four-quarter forecast and a four-quarter reversion period.

Management considered the need to qualitatively adjust expected credit losses for information not already captured in the loss estimation. The Company considered the qualitative factors that were relevant as of the reporting date, which included, but were not limited to: independent loan review results, portfolio concentrations, lending strategies, quality of assets, regulatory review results, economic conditions and associate retention.

Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. The Company maintains a net book balance threshold of $500,000 for individually evaluated loans unless further analysis in the future suggests a change is needed to

this threshold based on the credit environment at that time. For collateral dependent financial assets where the Company has determined that foreclosure of the collateral is probable, or where the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the Company expects repayment of the financial asset to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral, the ACL is measured based on the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the amortized cost basis of the asset as of the measurement date. When repayment is expected to be from the operation of the collateral, expected credit losses are calculated as the amount by which the amortized cost basis of the financial asset exceeds the present value of expected cash flows from the operation of the collateral. When repayment is expected to be from the sale of the collateral, expected credit losses are calculated as the amount by which the amortized cost basis of the financial asset exceeds the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated cost to sell. The allowance for credit losses may be zero if the fair value of the collateral at the measurement date exceeds the amortized cost basis of the financial asset. If the loan is not collateral dependent, the measurement of loss is based on the difference between the expected and contractual future cash flows of the loan.

Management measures expected credit losses over the contractual term of a loan. When determining the contractual term, the Company considers expected prepayments but is precluded from considering expected extensions, renewals, or modifications, unless the Company reasonably expects it will execute a loan modification (“LM”) with a borrower. In the event of a reasonably expected LM, the Company factors the reasonably-expected LM into the current expected credit losses estimate.

Purchased credit-deteriorated, otherwise referred to herein as (“PCD”), assets are defined as acquired individual financial assets (or acquired groups of financial assets with similar risk characteristics) that, as of the date of acquisition, have experienced a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination, as determined by the Company’s assessment. The Company records acquired PCD loans by adding the expected credit losses (i.e. allowance for credit losses) to the purchase price of the financial assets rather than recording through the provision for credit losses in the income statement. The expected credit losses, as of the acquisition day, of a PCD loan is added to the allowance for credit losses. The non-credit discount or premium is the difference between the unpaid principal balance and the amortized cost basis as of the acquisition date. Subsequent to the acquisition date, the change in the ACL on PCD loans is recognized through the provision for credit losses. The non-credit discount or premium is accreted or amortized, respectively, into interest income over the remaining life of the PCD loan on a level-yield basis. In accordance with the transition requirements within the standard, the Company’s purchased credit-impaired loans (“PCI”) were treated as PCD loans.

The Company follows its nonaccrual policy by reversing contractual interest income in the income statement when the Company places a loan on nonaccrual status. Therefore, management excludes the accrued interest receivable balance from the amortized cost basis in measuring expected credit losses on the portfolio and does not record an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable. As of September 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, the accrued interest receivables for loans, which is recorded in other assets ,were $15.6 million and $15.5 million, respectively.

ACL – Off Balance Sheet Credit Exposures – The Company has a variety of assets that have a component that qualifies as an off-balance sheet exposure. These primarily include undrawn portions of revolving lines of credit and standby letters of credit. The expected losses associated with these exposures within the unfunded portion of the expected credit losses will be recorded as a liability on the balance sheet with an offsetting income statement expense. Management has determined that all the Company’s off-balance-sheet credit exposures, net of floorplan lines, are not unconditionally cancellable. As of September 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, the liability recorded for expected credit losses on unfunded commitments in Other Liabilities was $3.7 million and $3.6 million, respectively. The current adjustment to the ACL for unfunded commitments is recognized through the provision for credit losses in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements:

In December 2023, FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09,* “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures.”*ASU 2023-09 requires public business entities to disclose in their rate reconciliation table additional categories of information about federal, state and foreign income taxes and to provide more details about the reconciling

items in certain categories if items meet a quantitative threshold. ASU 2023-09 also requires all entities to disclose income taxes paid, net of refunds, disaggregated by federal, state, and foreign taxes for annual periods and to disaggregate the information by jurisdiction based on a quantitative threshold, among other things. The guidance became effective for us on January 1, 2025, and has been applied prospectively. ASU 2023-09 did nothave a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Recently Issued Not Yet Effective Accounting Pronouncements:

During interim periods, the Company follows the accounting policies set forth in its annual audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, as filed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC, except as described above. The following is a summary of recent authoritative pronouncements issued but not yet effective that could impact the accounting, reporting, and/or disclosure of financial information by the Company.

In November 2024, FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03,* “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses.”*ASU 2024-03 requires disaggregated disclosure of income statement expenses for public business entities. ASU 2024-03 requires new financial statement disclosures in tabular format, disaggregating information about prescribed categories underlying any relevant income statement expense caption. The prescribed categories include, among other things, employee compensation, depreciation, and intangible asset amortization. Additionally, entities must disclose the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, an entity’s definition of selling expenses. ASU 2024-03 is effective for us for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, though early adoption is permitted. The Company is assessing ASU 2024-03, and its adoption is not expected to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2025, FASB issued ASU No. 2025-08,“Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326). The amendments in this update expand the use of the gross-up approach to certain acquired loans beyond purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this update must be adopted prospectively to loans that are acquired on or after the initial application date. Management is evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In November 2025, FASB issued ASU No. 2025-09,“Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)” The amendments in this update are intended to more closely align hedge accounting with the economics of an entity’s risk management activities. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years, though early adoption is permitted. Management is evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In December 2025, FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11*“Interim Reporting (Topic 270)”*The amendments in this update clarify current interim disclosure requirements and provide a comprehensive list of required interim disclosures. The update also incorporates a disclosure principle that requires entities to disclose events that occur after the end of the last annual reporting period. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, including interim periods within those fiscal years, though early adoption is permitted. Management is evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In December 2025, FASB issued ASU No. 2025-12*“Codification Improvements*” ASU 2025-12 addresses suggestions received from stakeholders on the Accounting Standards Codification and to make other incremental improvements to U.S. GAAP. The update represents changes to the Codification that (1) clarify, (2) correct errors, or (3) make minor improvements. The amendments make the Codification easier to understand and apply. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In April 2026, FASB issued ASU No. 2026-01, Equity (Topic 505) –“Initial Measurement of Paid-in-Kind Dividends on Equity-Classified Preferred Stock” ASU 2026-01 introduces a single, standardized approach for the initial measurement of paid-in-kind (“PIK”) dividends on equity-classified preferred stock. This update addresses long-standing diversity in practice and improves comparability across entities. The new guidance mandates measurement based on the stated PIK dividend rate in the preferred stock agreement for in-scope arrangements. This approach aligns accounting with the underlying economics, reflects prevailing market practice, and enhances operability. Certain arrangements, including those involving fixed monetary amounts settled in variable shares, remain outside the scope. The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, though early adoption is permitted. Management is evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In May 2026, FASB issued ASU No. 2026-02*“Environmental Credits and Environmental Credit Obligations (Topic 818)”* ASU 2026-02 improves the financial accounting for and disclosure of activities related to environmental credits and environmental credit obligations. This update provides recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure requirements for all entities that generate, purchase, or receive environmental credits or have a regulatory compliance obligation that may be settled with environmental credits. This standard is effective for the Company for annual reporting periods (and interim periods within those annual periods) beginning after Dec. 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. Management is evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In September 2026, FASB issued ASU No. 2026-03*“Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Investment Companies with Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions*” ASU 2026-03 requires investment companies holding equity securities with contractual restrictions on their sale to consider the effect of the contractual sale restriction when measuring an equity security’s fair value. This standard is effective for the Company for annual reporting periods (and interim periods within those annual periods) beginning after Dec. 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. Management is evaluating the provisions of this ASU and does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Note 2. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive common share equivalents using the treasury stock method. Dilutive common share equivalents include common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and restricted stock. The effect from the stock options and restricted stock on incremental shares from the assumed conversions for net income per share-basic and net income per share-diluted are

presented below. There wereno antidilutive shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026, and 2025, respectively.

The following is a summary of the basic and diluted earnings per share computation*(dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)*:

Note 3. Securities

Available-for-sale securities (“AFS”), which include any security for which the Company has no immediate plan to sell, but which may be sold in the future, are carried at fair value. Realized gains and losses, based on specifically identified amortized cost of the individual security, are included in other income. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded, net of related income tax effects, in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Premiums and discounts are amortized and accreted, respectively, to interest income using the constant effective yield method over the estimated life of the security. Prepayments are anticipated for mortgage-backed and Small Business Administration (“SBA”) securities. Premiums on callable securities are amortized to their earliest call date.

Held-to-maturity securities (“HTM”), which include any security for which the Company has both the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity, are carried at historical cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Premiums and discounts are amortized and accreted, respectively, to interest income using the constant effective yield method over the security’s estimated life. Prepayments are anticipated for mortgage-backed and SBA securities. Premiums on callable securities are amortized to their earliest call date.

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of securities AFS and HTM are summarized as follows*(in thousands)*:

At September 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, securities with a carrying value totaling approximately $327.5 million and $315.1 million, respectively, were pledged to secure public funds and securities sold under repurchase agreements.

For the three months ended September 30, 2026, the Company recognizedno gross realized gains or losses on investment securities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2026, gross realized gains and losses were $62 thousand and $7 thousand, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, there were $210 thousand in gross realized gains and $3.9 million in gross realized losses related to the sale of investment securities.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at September 30, 2026, by contractual maturity for non-mortgage-backed securities are shown below*(in thousands)*. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

The following tables present the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities AFS and HTM have been in a continuous unrealized loss position*(in thousands)*:

For any securities classified as AFS that are in an unrealized loss position at the balance sheet date, the Company assesses whether it intends to sell the security, or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis which would require a write-down to fair value through net income. Because the Company currently does not intend to sell those AFS securities that have an unrealized loss at September 30, 2026, and it is not likely that they will be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company has determined that no write-down is necessary. In addition, the Company evaluates whether any portion of the decline in fair value of AFS securities is the result of credit deterioration, which would require the recognition of an allowance for credit losses. The unrealized losses associated with available-for-sale securities at September 30, 2026, are driven by changes in interest rates and are not due to the credit quality of the securities, and accordingly, no allowance for credit losses is considered necessary related to available-for-sale securities at September 30, 2026. Management evaluates the financial performance of the issuers on a quarterly basis to determine if it is probable that the issuers can make all contractual principal and interest payments.

The unrealized losses in the Company’s HTM portfolio were caused by changes in the interest rate environment. The Company has a zero-loss expectation for its U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) and mortgage-backed securities (GSEs), and accordingly, no allowance for credit losses is estimated for these securities. The HTM municipal securities are primarily general obligation bonds, which have a very low historical default rate due to issuers generally having unlimited taxing authority to service the debt. All debt securities in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2026, continue to perform as scheduled and we do not believe an allowance for credit losses is necessary.

The Company utilizes bond credit ratings assigned by third party ratings agencies to monitor the credit quality of debt securities held-to-maturity. At September 30, 2026, all rated debt securities classified as held-to-maturity were rated AA- or higher by at least one rating agency. Updated credit ratings are obtained as they become available from the ratings agencies.

Allowance for Credit Losses (“ACL”)

There wereno past due or nonaccrual AFS or HTM securities at September 30, 2026, or December 31, 2025. Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses and based on the analysis of the underlying risk characteristics of its AFS and HTM portfolios, including credit ratings and other qualitative factors, there wasno provision

for credit losses related to AFS or HTM securities recorded during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026, and 2025, respectively, because the ACL was deemed immaterial.

Other Investments:

Other investments primarily consist of restricted, non-marketable equity securities, including Federal Reserve Bank stock, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, and First National Bankers Bank stock. Because these securities have no readily determinable market value, they are carried at cost and evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of their par value. Other investments include an investment in a Community Development Fund, carried at fair value. The fund is an actively managed mutual fund that holds mainly, though not exclusively, mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities. It supports the Bank's community reinvestment goals. As of September 30, 2026, the Company determined that its other investment securities were not impaired.

The following is the amortized cost and carrying value of other investments*(in thousands)*:

Note 4. Loans and Leases and Allowance for Credit Losses

Portfolio Segmentation:

Major categories of loans and leases are summarized as follows*(in thousands)*:

The loan and lease portfolio is disaggregated into segments. There areseven loan and lease portfolio segments which include commercial real estate non-owner occupied, commercial real estate owner occupied, consumer real estate, construction and land development, commercial and industrial, leases, and consumer and other.

The following describe risk characteristics relevant to each of the portfolio segments:

Commercial Real Estate – Non-Owner Occupied: Commercial real estate loans for income-producing properties such as apartment buildings, office and industrial buildings, and retail shopping centers are repaid from rent income derived from the properties. Loans within this portfolio segment are particularly sensitive to the valuation of real estate.

Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occupied: Commercial real estate loans to operating businesses are long-term financing of land and buildings where the owner occupies the property. These loans are repaid by cash flow generated from the business operation.

Consumer Real Estate: Consumer real estate loans include real estate loans secured by first liens, second liens, or open end real estate loans, such as home equity lines. These are repaid by various means such as a borrower’s income, sale of the property, or rental income derived from the property. Loans within this portfolio segment are particularly sensitive to the valuation of real estate.

Construction and Land Development: Loans for real estate construction and development are repaid through cash flow related to the operations, sale or refinance of the underlying property. This portfolio segment includes extensions of credit to real estate developers or investors where repayment is dependent on the sale of the real estate or income generated from the real estate collateral. Loans within this portfolio segment are particularly sensitive to the valuation of real estate.

Commercial and Industrial: The commercial and industrial loan portfolio segment includes commercial and financial loans. These loans include those loans to commercial customers for use in normal business operations to finance working capital needs, equipment purchases, or expansion projects. Loans are repaid by business cash flows. Collection risk in this portfolio is driven by the creditworthiness of the underlying borrower, particularly cash flows from the customers’ business operations.

Leases: The lease portfolio segment includes leases to small and mid-size companies for equipment financing leases. These leases are secured by a secured interest in the equipment being leased.

Consumer and Other: The consumer loan portfolio segment includes direct consumer installment loans, overdrafts and other revolving credit loans, and educational loans. Loans in this portfolio are sensitive to unemployment and other key consumer economic measures.

The following tables detail the changes in the allowance for credit losses by loan and lease classification*(in thousands)*:

We maintain the allowance for credit losses at a level that we deem appropriate to adequately cover the expected credit losses in the loan and lease portfolio. Our provision for credit losses on loan and lease for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026, was $1.1 million and $6.1 million, respectively, and $351 thousand and $2.9 million, during the three

and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively. As of September 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, our allowance for credit losses was $45.6 million and $40.9 million, respectively, which we deemed to be adequate at each of the respective dates. Our allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans and leases was 0.94% at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.

A description of the general characteristics of the risk grades used by the Company is as follows:

Pass: Loans and leases in this risk category involve borrowers of acceptable-to-strong credit quality and risk who have the apparent ability to satisfy their loan and lease obligations. Loans and leases in this risk grade would possess sufficient mitigating factors, such as adequate collateral or strong guarantors possessing the capacity to repay the debt if required, for any weakness that may exist.

Watch: Loans and leases in this risk category involve borrowers that exhibit characteristics, or are operating under conditions that, if not successfully mitigated as planned, have a reasonable risk of resulting in a downgrade within the next six to twelve months. Loans and leases may remain in this risk category for six months and then are either upgraded or downgraded upon subsequent evaluation.

Special Mention: Loans and leases in this risk grade are the equivalent of the regulatory definition of “Other Assets Especially Mentioned” classification. Loans and leases in this category possess some credit deficiency or potential weakness, which requires a high level of management attention. Potential weaknesses include declining trends in operating earnings and cash flows and /or reliance on the secondary source of repayment. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in noticeable deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Company’s credit position.

Substandard: Loans and leases in this risk grade are inadequately protected by the borrower’s current financial condition and payment capability or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans and leases so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the orderly repayment of debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful: Loans and leases in this risk grade have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or orderly repayment in full, on the basis of current existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific factors that may work to the advantage and strengthening of the exposure, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined.

Uncollectible: Loans and leases in this risk grade are considered to be non-collectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This does not mean the loan or lease has absolutely no recovery value, but rather it is neither practical nor desirable to defer writing off the loan or lease, even though partial recovery may be obtained in the future. Charge-offs against the allowance for credit losses are taken in the period in which the loan or lease becomes uncollectible. Consequently, the Company typically does not maintain a recorded investment in loans or leases within this category.

The Company evaluates the loan risk grading system definitions and allowance for credit losses methodology on an ongoing basis.

The following tables outline the amount of each loan and lease classification and the amount categorized into each risk rating based on year of origination as of September 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025*(in thousands)*:

(1)Certain amounts, previously reported, have been reclassified to state all periods on a comparable basis.

(2) Leases are not formally risk rated and classified as “Pass”. Balances include$2.9 million of leases on nonaccrual as of December 31, 2025. Leases were formally risk rated beginning in the quarter-ended September 30, 2026.

Past Due Loans and Leases:

A loan or lease is considered past due if any required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were required to be made under the terms of the loan or lease agreement. Generally, management places a loan or lease on nonaccrual when there is a clear indicator that the borrower’s cash flow may not be sufficient to meet payments as they become due, which is generally when a loan or lease is 90 days past due.

The following tables present an aging analysis of our loan and lease portfolio*(in thousands)*:

The table below presents the amortized cost basis of loans on nonaccrual status and loans past due 90 or more days and still accruing interest at September 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025. Also presented is the balance of loans on nonaccrual status at September 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, for which there was no related allowance for credit losses recorded*(in thousands)*:

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent loans, which are individually evaluated to determine expected credit losses*(in thousands)*:

Loan Modifications to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty:

The table below shows the amortized cost of loans and leases made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty that were modified during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026, and 2025, respectively.(dollars in thousands):

The following table summarizes the financial impacts of loan modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026, and 2025, respectively.* (dollars in thousands)*: