BAR HARBOR BANKSHARES

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The consolidated financial statements (unaudited) (the “financial statements”) of Bar Harbor Bankshares and its subsidiaries (the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” or similar terms) have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Company is a Maine financial institution holding company for the purposes of the laws of the State of Maine, and as such is subject to the jurisdiction of the Superintendent of the Maine Bureau of Financial Institutions. These financial statements include our accounts, the accounts of our wholly owned subsidiary Bar Harbor Bank & Trust (the “Bank”) and the Bank’s consolidated subsidiaries. The results of operations of companies or assets acquired are included only from the dates of acquisition. All material wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries are consolidated unless GAAP requires otherwise.

In addition, these interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, and accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared according to GAAP have been omitted.

The results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. The consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and note disclosures in the Form 10-K previously filed with the SEC. In management's opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement are reflected in the interim periods presented.

Reclassifications: Whenever necessary, amounts in the consolidated financial statements are reclassified to conform to current presentation. The reclassifications had no impact on net income, total shareholders’ equity or total assets and liabilities in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Segment Reporting: The Company’s reportable segment is determined by the Chief Executive Officer, who is designated as the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), based upon information provided about the Company’s products and services offered, primarily banking operations. Operations of the Company are solely within community banking industry and include traditional community banking services, including lending activities, acceptance of demand, savings and time deposits, business services, investment management, trust and third-party brokerage services. These products and services have similar distribution methods, types of customers and regulatory responsibilities. An operating segment is defined as a component of a business for which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker in deciding how to allocate resources and evaluate performance. Consolidated net income of the company is the primary performance metric utilized by the CODM. The CODM uses revenue streams to evaluate product pricing and significant expenses to assess performance and evaluate return on assets. The CODM uses consolidated net income to benchmark the Company against its competitors. The benchmarking analysis coupled with monitoring of budget to actual results are used in assessment performance and in establishing compensation. The majority of the Company’s revenue is from the business of banking. While the Company has assigned certain management responsibilities by business lines, the Company’s CODM monitors and evaluates financial performance on a Company-wide basis. Accordingly, segment information is not presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Therefore, the Company has determined that its business is conducted inone reportable segment and represents the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There were no recent accounting standards updates (“ASU”) issued that could have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2026.

**NOTE 2.**ACQUISITION

Guaranty Bancorp, Inc.

On July 31, 2025, the Company completed its acquisition of Guaranty Bancorp, Inc. (“Guaranty”), the holding company of Woodsville Guaranty Savings Bank (“Woodsville”). The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination under ASC Topic 805, and Guaranty’s results of operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date.

As of March 31, 2026, the acquisition accounting remains provisional primarily with respect to the valuation of loans, identifiable intangible assets, deposits, and certain assumed liabilities. The measurement period will not exceed one year from the acquisition date. No measurement-period adjustments were recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026.

Acquisition and integration related costs were expensed as incurred and totaled $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and $239 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2025, recorded in Acquisition, conversion and other expenses on the income statement.

The following provides the unaudited pro forma results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2025, as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2025. The pro forma results combine the historical results of Guaranty into our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, including the impact of certain acquisition accounting adjustments, which includes loan discount accretion, intangible assets amortization, and deposit premium amortization. The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been obtained had the acquisition actually occurred on January 1, 2025. No assumptions have been applied to the pro forma results of operations regarding possible revenue enhancements, provision for credit losses, expense efficiencies or asset dispositions. Recognized acquisition-related expenses and other adjustments related to the timing of expenses, are included in net income. For the three months ended March 31, 2025 total revenue would have been $45.5 million and net income would have been $3.6 million.

NOTE 3. SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE

The following is a summary of available-for-sale debt securities (“AFS”):

Included in mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are securities backed by residential and commercial loans.

Credit Quality Information

We monitor the credit quality of available-for-sale debt securities through credit ratings from various rating agencies and substantial price changes. In an effort to make informed decisions, we utilize credit ratings that express opinions about the credit quality of a security. Securities are triggered for further review in the quarter if the security has significant fluctuations in ratings, significant pricing changes, or drops below investment-grade. For securities without credit ratings, we utilize other financial information indicating the financial health of the underlying municipality, agency, or organization associated with the underlying security.

The Company hasone previously identified nonaccrual corporate bond with a carrying value of $1.3 million as of March 31, 2026 and $2.2 million as of December 31, 2025. During the period, due to continued credit deterioration the Company did an additional write-down of $896 thousand, which is included in the loss on available-for-sale debt securities in the consolidated statements of income.

The table below presents a rollforward by major security type for the quarters ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 of the allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities held at period end:

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale debt securities segregated by contractual maturity at March 31, 2026 are presented below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are shown in total, as their maturities are highly variable.

The proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of available-for-sale debt securities, gross realized gains and losses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 are as follows:

Accrued interest receivable on available-for-sale debt securities totaled $3.5 million at March 31, 2026 and $3.2 million at December 31, 2025, which is reported in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

The following tables summarize available-for-sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, aggregated by major security type and length of time in continuous unrealized loss position:

The following summarizes, by investment security type, the impact of performing securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2026:

Obligations of US Government-sponsored enterprises

6 out of the total 6 securities in our portfolio of AFS obligations of US Government-sponsored enterprises were in unrealized loss positions. Aggregate unrealized losses represented 2.24% of the amortized cost of securities in unrealized loss positions. The US Small Business Administration guarantees the contractual cash flows of all of our obligations of US Government-sponsored enterprises. The securities are investment grade rated and there were no material underlying credit downgrades during the quarter. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates, and not credit quality, and the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the securities are investment grade rated and there were no material underlying credit downgrades during the quarter. All securities are performing.

US Government-sponsored enterprises

398 out of the total 509 securities in our portfolio of AFS US Government-sponsored enterprises were in unrealized loss positions. Aggregate unrealized losses represented 12.35% of the amortized cost of securities in unrealized loss positions. The Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation guarantee the contractual cash flows of all of our US Government-sponsored enterprises. The securities are investment grade rated and there were no material underlying credit downgrades during the quarter. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates, and not credit quality, and the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the securities are investment grade rated and there were no material underlying credit downgrades during the quarter. All securities are performing.

US Government agency

136 out of the total 170 securities in our portfolio of AFS US Government agency securities were in unrealized loss positions. Aggregate unrealized losses represented 7.35% of the amortized cost of securities in unrealized loss positions. The Government National Mortgage Association guarantees the contractual cash flows of all of our US Government agency securities. The securities are investment grade rated and there were no material underlying credit downgrades during the quarter. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates, and not credit quality, and the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the securities are investment grade rated and there were no material underlying credit downgrades during the quarter. All securities are performing.

Private label

14 of the total 15 securities in our portfolio of AFS private label mortgage-backed securities were in unrealized loss positions. Aggregate unrealized losses represented 6.80% of the amortized cost of securities in unrealized loss positions. We expect to receive all of the future contractual cash flows related to the amortized cost on these securities. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates, and not credit quality, and the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the securities are investment grade rated and there were no material underlying credit downgrades during the quarter. All securities are performing.

Obligations of states and political subdivisions thereof

54 of the total 64 securities in our portfolio of AFS municipal bonds and obligations were in unrealized loss positions. Aggregate unrealized losses represented 15.59% of the amortized cost of securities in unrealized loss positions. We continually monitor the municipal bond sector of the market carefully and periodically evaluate the appropriate level of exposure to the market. At this time, we believe (i) the bonds in this portfolio carry minimal risk of default and (ii) we are appropriately compensated for the risk. There were no material underlying credit downgrades during the quarter. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates, and not credit quality, and the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the securities are investment grade rated and there were no material underlying credit downgrades during the quarter. All securities are performing.

Corporate bonds

20 out of the total 33 securities in our portfolio of AFS corporate bonds were in an unrealized loss position. The aggregate unrealized loss represents 4.07% of the amortized cost of bonds in unrealized loss positions. We review the financial strength of all of these bonds, and we have concluded that the amortized cost remains supported by the expected future cash flows of these securities. The most recent review includes all bond issuers and their current credit ratings, financial performance and capitalization. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates, and not credit quality, and the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the securities are investment grade rated and there were no material underlying credit downgrades during the quarter. All but the one corporate bond discussed above are performing.

We expect to recover the amortized cost basis on all securities in our AFS portfolio. Furthermore, we do not intend to sell nor do we anticipate that we will be required to sell any securities in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2026, prior to this recovery.

A summary of securities pledged as collateral for certain deposits and borrowing arrangements for the months ended March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 is as follows:

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

We evaluate risk characteristics of loans based on regulatory call report code with segmentation based on the underlying collateral for certain loan types. The following is a summary of total loans based on regulatory call report code segmentation for certain loan types:

Total unamortized net costs and premiums included in loan totals were as follows:

We exclude accrued interest receivable from the amortized cost basis of loans disclosed throughout this footnote. As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, accrued interest receivable for loans totaled $13.1 million and $11.5 million, respectively, and is included in the “other assets” line item on the consolidated balance sheets.

Characteristics of each loan portfolio segment, including acquired loans, are as follows:

Commercial construction- Loans in this segment primarily include raw land, land development and construction of commercial and multifamily residential properties. Collateral values are determined based upon appraisals and evaluations of the completed structure in accordance with established policy guidelines. Maximum loan-to-value ratios at origination are governed by established policy guidelines that are more restrictive than on stabilized commercial real estate transactions. Construction loans are primarily paid by the cash flow generated from the completed structure, such as operating leases, rents, or other operating cash flows from the borrower.

Commercial real estate owner occupied and non-owner occupied- Loans in these segments are primarily owner-occupied or income-producing properties. Loans to Real Estate Investment Trusts and unsecured loans to developers that closely correlate to the inherent risk in commercial real estate markets are also included. Commercial real estate loans are typically written with amortizing payment structures. Collateral values are determined based upon appraisals and evaluations in accordance with established policy guidelines. Maximum loan-to-value ratios at origination are governed by established policy and regulatory guidelines. Commercial real estate loans are primarily paid by the cash flow generated from the real property, such as operating leases, rents, or other operating cash flows from the borrower.

Municipal and other- Loans in this segment primarily include loans to various state and municipal government entities. Loans made to these borrowers may provide us with tax-exempt income. While governed and underwritten similar to commercial loans they do have unique requirements based on established polices. Almost all state and municipal loans are considered a general obligation of the issuing entity. Given the size of many municipal borrowers, borrowings are normally not rated by major rating agencies. Municipal loans are primarily repaid by taxes collected by the municipality.

Commercial and industrial loans- Loans consist of revolving and term loan obligations extended to business and corporate enterprises for the purpose of financing working capital and/or capital investment in this segment. Generally loans are secured by assets of the business such as accounts receivable, inventory, marketable securities, other liquid collateral, equipment and other business assets. Some loans in this category may be unsecured or guaranteed by government agencies such as the U.S. Small Business Administration. Loans are primarily paid by the operating cash flows of the borrower.

Residential real estate- All loans in this segment are collateralized by one-to-four family homes. Residential real estate loans held in the loan portfolio are made to borrowers who demonstrate the ability to make scheduled payments with full consideration to various underwriting factors. Borrower qualifications include favorable credit history combined with supportive income requirements and combined loan-to-value ratios within established policy guidelines. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels.

Home equity -All loans and lines of credit are made to qualified individuals and are secured by senior or junior mortgage liens on owner-occupied one- to four-family homes, condominiums, or vacation homes. The home equity loan has a fixed rate and is billed as equal payments comprised of principal and interest. The home equity line of credit has a variable rate and is billed as interest-only payments during the draw period. At the end of the draw period, the home equity line of credit is billed as a percentage of the principal balance plus all accrued interest. Borrower qualifications include favorable credit history combined with supportive income requirements and combined loan-to-value ratios within established policy guidelines. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels.

Consumer other- Loans in this segment include personal lines of credit and amortizing loans made to qualified individuals for various purposes such as auto loans, recreational equipment, overdraft protection or other consumer loans. Borrower qualifications include favorable credit history combined with supportive income and collateral requirements within established policy guidelines, as applicable. Consumer loans may be secured or unsecured. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels.

Allowance for Credit Losses

The Allowance for Credit Losses (“ACL”) is comprised of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded commitments which is accounted for as a separate liability in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. The level of the ACL represents management’s estimate of expected credit losses over the expected life of the loans at the consolidated balance sheet date.

The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of loans to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. Loans, or portions thereof, are charged off against the allowance when they are deemed uncollectible. Expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off. The allowance is comprised of reserves measured on a collective (pool) basis based on a lifetime loss-rate model when similar risk characteristics exist. Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis.

The estimate of expected credit losses on collectively evaluated loans is based on relevant information about current conditions, past events, and reasonable and supportable forward-looking forecasts regarding collectability of the reported amounts. Management employs a process and methodology to estimate the allowance for credit losses on collectively evaluated loans that evaluates both quantitative and qualitative components. The methodology for evaluating the quantitative component involves pooling loans into portfolio segments for loans that share similar risk characteristics.

For all loan segments measured on a collective basis, the Company utilizes a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) methodology to estimate credit losses over the expected life of the loan. The DCF methodology applies the probability of default (“PD”) and the loss given default (“LGD”) assumptions over the remaining contractual life of the loan which is adjusted for prepayment speeds, curtailment rate and time to recovery assumptions to estimate a reserve for each loan. For all loan segments, the quantitative loss rates are supplemented by qualitative factors reflecting management’s view of how losses may vary from those represented by quantitative loss rates. Qualitative factors are applied to each portfolio segment to reflect management’s estimate of expected changes in current conditions at the balance sheet date relative to historical performance.

The Company uses regression models to develop the PD and LGD assumptions, which are derived primarily from segment-specific selected peers. The loss rates are adjusted by an economic forecast over the reasonable and supportable forecast period after which time they revert back to the historical mean. Key economic indicators used in the model include unemployment rates, commercial real estate values, and housing prices. Management currently applies a two-quarter reasonable and supportable forecast period, followed by a six-quarter straight-line reversion to historical mean for each economic indicator. The combination of adjustments for credit expectations (PD and LGD) and timing expectations (prepayment, curtailment, and time to recovery) produces an expected cash flow stream at the instrument level. Specific instrument effective yields are calculated, net of the impacts of prepayment assumptions, and the instrument expected cash flows are then discounted at that effective yield to produce an instrument-level Net Present Value (“NPV”). An allowance is established for the difference between the instrument’s NPV and amortized cost basis. The allowance is also adjusted for current conditions through the use qualitative factors. The qualitative factors consider both relevant internal and external information in their application.

The activity in the ACL for the periods ended are as follows:

Unfunded Commitments

The ACL on unfunded commitments is recognized as a liability (other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets), with adjustments to the reserve recognized in other non-interest expense in the consolidated statements of income. Unfunded commitments to extend credit include unused portions of lines of credit and standby and commercial letters of credit. The process used to determine the allowance for these exposures is consistent with the process for determining the allowance for loans, as adjusted for estimated funding probabilities or loan equivalency factors. A charge (credit) to provision for credit losses on the consolidated statements of income is made to account for the change in the allowance on off-balance sheet exposures between reporting periods.

The activity in the ACL on unfunded commitments for the periods ended was as follows:

Loan Origination/Risk Management: We have certain lending policies and procedures in place designed to maximize loan income within an acceptable level of risk. Our Board of Directors reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis. A reporting system supplements the review process by providing management and the Board of Directors with frequent reports related to loan production, loan quality, and concentration of credit, loan delinquencies, non-performing loans and potential problem loans. We seek to diversify the loan portfolio as a means of managing risk associated with fluctuations in economic conditions.

Credit Quality Indicators: In monitoring the credit quality of the portfolio, management applies a credit quality indicator and uses an internal risk rating system to categorize commercial loans. These credit quality indicators range from one through nine, with a higher number correlating to increasing risk of loss. Consistent with regulatory guidelines, the Company provides for the classification of loans which are considered to be of lesser quality as special mention, substandard, doubtful, or loss (i.e. risk-rated 6, 7, 8 and 9, respectively). Residential, home equity and consumer loans are classified as performing or non-performing based on payment performance.

The following are the definitions of our credit quality indicators:

Pass: Loans we consider in the commercial portfolio segments that are not adversely rated, are contractually current as to principal and interest, and are otherwise in compliance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Management believes there is a low risk of loss related to these loans considered pass-rated.

Special Mention: Loans considered having some potential weaknesses, but are deemed to not carry levels of risk inherent in one of the subsequent categories, are designated as special mention. A special mention loan has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. This might include loans which may require a higher level of supervision or internal reporting because of: (i) declining industry trends; (ii) increasing reliance on secondary sources of repayment; (iii) the poor condition of or lack of control over collateral; or (iv) failure to obtain proper documentation or any other deviations from prudent lending practices. Economic or market conditions which may, in the future, affect the obligor may warrant special mention of the asset. Loans for which an adverse trend in the borrower's operations or an imbalanced position in the balance sheet which has not reached a point where the liquidation is jeopardized may be included in this classification. Special mention loans are not adversely classified and do not expose us to sufficient risks to warrant classification.

Substandard: Loans we consider as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard loans have a well-defined weakness that jeopardizes liquidation of the debt. Substandard loans include those loans where there is the distinct possibility of some loss of principal, if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful: Loans we consider as doubtful have all of the weaknesses inherent in those loans that are classified as substandard. These loans have the added characteristic of a well-defined weakness which is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any, and calls into question the collectability of the full balance of the loan. The possibility of loss is high but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors, which may work to the advantage and strengthening of the loan, its classification as loss is deferred until its more exact status is determined. Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition, or liquidation procedures, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral and refinancing plans. The entire amount of the loan might not be classified as doubtful when collection of a specific portion appears highly probable. Loans are generally not classified doubtful for an extended period of time (i.e., over a year).

Loss: Loans we consider as losses are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as an asset is not warranted and the uncollectible amounts are charged-off. This classification does not mean the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this worthless asset even though partial recovery may be effected in the future. Losses are taken in the period in which they are determined to be uncollectible.

The following table presents our loans by year of origination, loan segmentation andrisk indicator as of March 31, 2026:

The following table presents our loans by year of origination, loan segmentation and risk indicator as of December 31, 2025:

Past Dues

The following is a summary of past due loans for the periods ended:

Non-Accrual Loans

The following is a summary of non-accrual loans for the periods ended:

Our policy is to reverse previously recorded interest income when a loan is placed on non-accrual, as such, the Company did not record any interest income on its non-accrual loans for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.

Collateral Dependent Loans

Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. For loans that are individually evaluated and collateral dependent, financial loans where we have determined that foreclosure of the collateral is probable, or where the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and we expect repayment of the financial asset to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral, the ACL is measured based on the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the amortized cost basis of the asset as of the measurement date.

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent loans by loan portfolio segment for the periods ended:

Loan Modifications to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty

In January 2023, the Company adopted ASU 2022-02, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures” which eliminated the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancing and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. This guidance was applied on a prospective basis. Upon adoption of this guidance, we are no longer required to establish a specific reserve for modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. Instead, these modifications are included in their respective category and a historical loss rate is applied to the current loan balance to arrive at the quantitative baseline portion of the ACL.

These modifications typically result from loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions.

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of loans that were both experiencing financial difficulty and modified during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, by class and by type of modification.

The following table presents the financial effect of loan modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.

As of March 31, 2026 the Bank hadno loans that were modified during the current period that defaulted within 12 months of the modification date.

PCD Loans

PCD loans were recorded at their amortized cost, less an allowance for credit losses on the Acquisition Date. There isno provision for credit loss expense recognized on PCD loans because the initial allowance is established by grossing-up the amortized cost of the PCD loans. The remaining difference between the net amortized cost basis and the allowance for credit losses and the fair value allocated to the loans on the date of acquisition is recognized as a non-credit-related discount that will be accreted into interest income over the life of the loans.

The following tables presents the unpaid principal balance and carrying amount of PCD loans. The balances do not include an allowance for credit losses which was $749 thousand as of March 31, 2026 and $751 thousand as of December 31, 2025.

The following table presents a reconciliation of acquired Guaranty PCD loans between their purchase price and par value at the time of the acquisition:

Foreclosure

There were $121 thousand of residential mortgage loans collateralized by real estate that are in the process of foreclosure as of March 31, 2026. Residential mortgage loans collateralized by real estate that were in the process of foreclosure as of December 31, 2025 totaled $171 thousand.

Mortgage Banking

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale at March 31, 2026 had an unpaid principal balance of $11.4 million and $5.2 million as of December 31, 2025. The interest rate exposure on loans held for sale is mitigated through forward sale commitments with certain approved secondary market investors. Forward sale commitments had a notional amount of $6.4 million at March 31, 2026, and $5.2 million at December 31, 2025. Refer to Note 9 for further discussion of forward sale commitments.

Loans Sold

For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, we sold $16.2 million and $9.8 million, respectively, of residential mortgage loans on the secondary market, which resulted in a net gain on sale of loans (net of costs, including direct and indirect origination costs) of $260 thousand and $174 thousand, respectively.

We sell residential loans on the secondary market while primarily retaining the servicing of these loans. Servicing retained loans helps to maintain customer relationships and earn fees over the servicing period. Loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The risks inherent in servicing assets relate primarily to level of prepayments that result from shifts in interest rates. We obtain third-party valuations of our servicing assets portfolio quarterly, and the assumptions are reflected in Fair Value disclosures.

NOTE 5. BORROWED FUNDS

Borrowed funds at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 are summarized, as follows:

Short-term debt includes FHLB advances with a remaining maturity of less than one year. We also maintain a $1.0 million secured line of credit with the FHLB that bears a daily adjustable rate calculated by the FHLB. There wasno outstanding balance on the FHLB line of credit for the periods ended March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025. There areno variable rate short-term FHLB borrowings.

We have the capacity to borrow funds on a secured basis utilizing the Borrower in Custody program, and the Discount Window at the Reserve Bank. At March 31, 2026, our available secured line of credit at the Reserve Bank was $94.5 million versus $94.0 million at December 31, 2025. We have pledged certain loans and securities to the Reserve Bank to support this arrangement.

We maintain an unused unsecured federal funds line of credit with a correspondent bank that has an aggregate overnight borrowing capacity of $40.0 million as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025. There wasno outstanding balance on the line of credit as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

Long-term FHLB advances consist of advances with a remaining maturity of more than one year. The advances outstanding at March 31, 2026 include callable advances of $80.0 million, non-callable advances of $1.0 million and amortizing advances of $1.0 million. There were $80.0 million of callable advances outstanding, non-callable advances of $1.0 million and $1.0 million of amortizing advances at December 31, 2025. All FHLB borrowings, including the line of credit, are secured by a blanket security agreement on certain qualified collateral, principally residential first mortgage loans and certain securities. There areno variable rate long-term FHLB borrowings.

A summary of maturities of FHLB advances as of March 31, 2026 is, as follows:

Each advance is payable at its maturity date, with a prepayment penalty for fixed rate advances. The advances were collateralized by $867.7 million and $740.7 million of loans under a blanket lien arrangement as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. Based on this collateral and the Company’s holdings of FHLB stock, the Company is eligible to borrow up to a total of $451.5 million at March 31, 2026.

At months ended March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, subordinated borrowings was as follows:

We executed a Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement with an aggregate of $40.0 million of subordinated notes (the “2029 Notes”) to accredited investors on November 26, 2019. The 2029 Notes have a maturity date of December 1, 2029 and bear a fixed interest rate of 4.63% through December 1, 2024 payable semi-annually in arrears. From December 1, 2024 and thereafter the interest rate shall be reset quarterly to an interest rate per annum equal to the then current three-month Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus 3.27%. We have the option beginning with the interest payment date of December 1, 2024, and on any scheduled payment date thereafter, to redeem the 2029 Notes, in whole or in part upon prior approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”). During the fourth quarter of 2024 we paid down $20.0 million of the outstanding subordinated notes. As of March 31, 2026 we have an outstanding subordinated note balance of $20.0 million.

We also have $20.6 million in floating Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (“Debentures”) issued by NHTB Capital Trust II (“Trust II”) and NHTB Capital Trust III (“Trust III”), which are both Connecticut statutory trusts. The Debentures issued on March 30, 2004 carry a variable interest rate of three-month SOFR plus 2.79%, and mature in 2034. The Debentures are callable by the Company at the time when any interest payment is made. Trust II and Trust III are considered variable interest entities for which we are not the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, Trust II and Trust III are not consolidated into our financial statements.

In connection with the acquisition, the Company assumed $13.0 million in fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes, that had a fair value of $11.2 million (the “2031 Notes”) issued by Guaranty. The 2031 Notes were originally issued on March 23, 2021 with a maturity date of April 1, 2031. The 2031 Notes bear a fixed-to-floating interest rate of 4.875% through April 1, 2026, payable quarterly in arrears. Beginning April 1, 2026 and thereafter, the interest rate shall be reset quarterly to an interest rate per annum equal to the then current three-month SOFR plus 4.82%. We have the option beginning with the interest payment date of April 1, 2026, and on any scheduled payment date thereafter, to redeem the 2031 Notes, in whole or in part upon prior approval of the Federal Reserve.

Repurchase Agreements

We can raise additional liquidity by entering into repurchase agreements at our discretion. In a security repurchase agreement transaction, we will generally sell a security, agreeing to repurchase either the same or substantially identical security on a specified later date, at a greater price than the original sales price. The difference between the sale price and purchase price is the cost of the proceeds, which is recorded as interest expense on the consolidated statements of income. The securities underlying the agreements are delivered to counterparties as security for the repurchase obligations. Since the securities are treated as collateral and the agreement does not qualify for a full transfer of effective control, the transactions do not meet the criteria to be classified as sales, and are therefore considered secured borrowing transactions for accounting purposes. Payments on such borrowings are interest only until the scheduled repurchase date. In a repurchase agreement, we are subject to the risk that the purchaser may default at maturity and not return the securities underlying the agreements. In order to minimize this potential risk, we either deal with established firms when entering into these transactions or with customers whose agreements stipulate that the securities underlying the agreement are not delivered to the customer and instead are held in segregated safekeeping accounts by our safekeeping agents.

NOTE 6. DEPOSITS

A summary of time deposits is, as follows:

At March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the scheduled maturities by year for time deposits are, as follows:

Included in time deposits are brokered deposits of $169.6 million and $151.6 million at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. Also included in time deposits are reciprocal deposits of $80.6 million and $88.7 million at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.

NOTE 7. CAPITAL RATIOS AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Reserve and the FDIC. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can result in mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Under the capital rules, risk-based capital ratios are calculated by dividing Tier 1, common equity Tier 1, and total risk-based capital, respectively, by risk-weighted assets. Assets and off-balance sheet credit equivalents are assigned to one of several risk-weight categories, based primarily on relative risk. The rules require banks and bank holding companies to maintain a minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%, a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0% and a total capital ratio of 8.0%. In addition, a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0% is required. Additionally, the capital rules require a bank holding company to maintain a capital conservation buffer of common equity Tier 1 capital in an amount above the minimum risk-based capital requirements equal to 2.5% of total risk weighted assets, or face restrictions on the ability to pay dividends, pay discretionary bonuses, and to engage in share repurchases.

Under the FDIC’s prompt corrective action rules, an insured state nonmember bank is considered “well capitalized” if its capital ratios meet or exceed the ratios as set forth in the following table and is not subject to any written agreement, order, capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. The Bank must meet well capitalized requirements under prompt corrective action provisions. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.

A bank holding company is considered “well capitalized” if the bank holding company (i) has a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0%, (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.0%, and (iii) is not subject to any written agreement order, capital directive or prompt corrective action directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure.

At March 31, 2026, the capital levels of both the Company and the Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements, and their regulatory capital ratios were above the minimum levels required to be considered well capitalized for regulatory purposes. The actual and required capital ratios are, as follows:

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

Components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is, as follows:

The following table presents the components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:

The following table presents the changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax impacts, for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:

The following tables presents the amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:

NOTE 8. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table presents the calculation of earnings per share:

NOTE 9. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

We use derivative instruments to minimize fluctuations in earnings and cash flows caused by interest rate volatility. Our interest rate risk management strategy involves modifying the re-pricing characteristics of certain assets or liabilities so the changes in interest rates do not have a significant effect on net interest income. Thus, all of our derivative contracts are considered to be interest rate contracts.

We recognize our derivative instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. On the date the derivative instrument is entered into, we designate whether the derivative is part of a hedging relationship (i.e., cash flow or fair value hedge). We formally document relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk management objective and strategy for undertaking hedge transactions. We also assess, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting the changes in cash flows or fair values of hedged items. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments that are highly effective and qualify as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income or loss.

We offer derivative products in the form of interest rate swaps, to commercial loan customers to facilitate their risk management strategies. These instruments are executed through Master Netting Arrangements (“MNAs”) with financial institution counterparties or Risk Participation Agreements (“RPAs”) with commercial bank counterparties, for which we assume a pro rata share of the credit exposure associated with a borrower's performance related to the derivative contract with the counterparty.

Information about derivative assets and liabilities at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, follows: