Primis Financial Corp.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders, Board of Directors, and Audit Committee of Primis Financial Corp.

McLean, Virginia

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Primis Financial Corp. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 16, 2026 expressed an adverse opinion.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Goodwill Impairment Evaluation – Bank Reporting Unit

As described in Note 1 and Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or circumstances warrant for both reporting units, Primis Bank and Primis Mortgage. A step one quantitative assessment was performed as of September 30, 2025 to determine if the fair value of the reporting units were less than their carrying amount. To determine the fair value of the reporting units, the Company utilizes a combination of valuation approaches: the comparable transactions approach, the control premium approach, the public market peers control premium approach, and the discounted cash flow approach.

We identified the evaluation of the quantitative assessment of goodwill impairment as of September 30, 2025 of the Bank reporting unit as a critical audit matter because of the significant auditor judgment, audit effort and specialized skills required to audit management’s judgments and subjective assumptions used in determining the fair value estimate, including evaluating the reasonableness of management’s cash flow projections used in the discounted cash flow approach.

The primary audit procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans – Economic Variable Forecasts

As described in Note 1 and Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, for loans segmented into pools based upon similar characteristics and risk profiles, the expected credit loss is measured over the life of each loan utilizing a combination of inputs: (i) probability of default, (ii) probability of attrition, (iii) loss given default and (iv) exposure at default. The various pool-specific inputs may be adjusted for current macroeconomic assumptions. In determining forecasted expected losses, Moody’s economic variable forecasts are used and probability weights are applied to the related economic scenarios. A significant amount of judgment is required to assess the reasonableness of the selection of the economic scenarios and the probability weights applied.

We identified the assessment of the economic variable forecasts as a critical audit matter because of the significant auditor judgment, audit effort and specialized skills required to audit management’s judgments used in determining the economic variable forecasts. These economic variable forecasts contribute significantly to the determination of the allowance for credit losses and changes to these assumptions could have a material effect on the Company’s financial results.

The primary audit procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

/s/ Crowe LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2024.

Fort Lauderdale, Florida

March 16, 2026

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders, Board of Directors, and Audit Committee of Primis Financial Corp.

McLean, Virginia

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Primis Financial Corp.’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, because of the effects of the material weakness discussed in the following paragraph, the Company has not maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included inManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: lack of proper restrictions and review controls related to deposit account processing for the digital bank platform.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements") and our report dated March 16, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion. We considered the material weakness identified above in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures applied in our audit of the 2025 financial statements, and this report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting does not affect such report on the financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanyingManagement’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Crowe LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida

March 16, 2026

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders, Board of Directors, and Audit Committee

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited, before the effects of the retrospective adjustments to the segment reporting disclosures for the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (“ASU 2023-07”), discussed in Notes 1 and 18 to the consolidated financial statements, the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Primis Financial Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, before the effects of the retrospective adjustments to the Company’s segment reporting disclosures for the adoption of ASU 2023-07 discussed in Notes 1 and 18, the consolidated financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the results of the Company’s operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the retrospective adjustments to the Company’s segment reporting disclosures discussed in Notes 1 and 18, and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such retrospective adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by Crowe LLP.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts, and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Forvis Mazars, LLP

We served as the Company’s auditor from 2013 to 2024.

Tysons, Virginia

October 15, 2024

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS) AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025, 2024 AND 2023

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company

Primis Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: FRST) is the bank holding company for Primis Bank, a Virginia state-chartered bank, that commenced operations on April 14, 2005. Primis Bank provides a range of financial services to individuals and small and medium-sized businesses.

As of December 31, 2025, Primis Bank had 24 full-service branches in Virginia and Maryland and also provides services to customers through certain online and mobile applications. Headquartered in McLean, Virginia, the Company has an administrative office in Glen Allen, Virginia and an operations center in Atlee, Virginia. PMC, a residential mortgage lender headquartered in Wilmington, North Carolina, is a consolidated subsidiary of Primis Bank. PFH owns the rights to the Panacea Financial brand and its intellectual property and partners with the Bank to offer a suite of financial products and services for doctors, their practices, and ultimately the broader healthcare industry. PFH was deconsolidated from the Company on March 31, 2025, as further discussed below in “PFH Deconsolidation and Sale of Shares”. The operating results of PFH were included in the Company’s consolidated operating results through March 31, 2025.

The accounting policies and practices of Primis and its subsidiaries conform to GAAP and follow general practices within the banking industry. Material policies and practices are described in this footnote.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Primis and its subsidiaries, Primis Bank and PMC. The results of operations for PFH are included in the Company’s results of operations until its deconsolidation as of March 31, 2025, as further described below. Significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Primis consolidates subsidiaries in which it holds, directly or indirectly, more than 50 percent of the voting rights or where it exercises control. Entities where Primis holds 20 to 50 percent of the voting rights, or has the ability to exercise significant influence, or both, are accounted for under the equity method. Primis owns EVB Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”), which is an unconsolidated subsidiary and the junior subordinated debt owed to the Trust is reported as a liability of Primis.

We determine whether we have a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or a VIE under GAAP. Voting interest entities are entities in which the total equity investment at risk is sufficient to enable the entity to finance itself independently and provides the equity holders with the obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual returns and the right to make decisions about the entity’s activities. We consolidate voting interest entities in which we have all, or at least a majority of, the voting interest. As defined in GAAP, VIEs are entities that lack one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. A controlling financial interest in a VIE is present when an enterprise has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The enterprise with a controlling financial interest, known as the primary beneficiary, consolidates the VIE. The Company has investments in VIE’s for which we are not the primary beneficiary and, as such, are not included in our consolidated financial statements.

PFH Deconsolidation and Sale of Shares

On December 21, 2023, PFH completed a $25 million Series B financing round led by a global venture capital firm. As part of the financing round, Primis acquired approximately 19% of PFH’s common stock for an immaterial purchase price due to previous operating losses in the Bank’s Panacea Financial Division. The Company performed an analysis and determined that PFH was a VIE because it lacks one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. The Company’s analysis further determined that it had a controlling financial interest in PFH due to the substantial historical activities between PFH and the Bank’s Panacea Financial Division combined with the limited activities of PFH outside of its relationship with Primis. Further, there were employees of Primis that historically carried out substantially all of the activities of PFH. Accordingly, the Company determined it was the primary beneficiary of PFH and consolidated it as of December 31, 2023.

As of March 31, 2025, the three primary executives of PFH resigned from their positions as management-level employees of Primis’ Panacea Financial Division of the Bank. Additionally, Primis and PFH amended their partnership agreement as of March 31, 2025 to allow PFH more control over the type and amount of lending it can perform through the Bank. As a result of these changes in the relationship between the Company and PFH, a re-assessment of PFH under the VIE accounting guidance was performed. The Company determined that PFH continues to be a VIE because it lacks one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. However, as of March 31, 2025, the Company has determined, based on the relationship changes described above, that it was no longer the primary beneficiary of the VIE because it no longer has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance. Accordingly, the Company deconsolidated PFH as of March 31, 2025. The Company determined that as of December 31, 2025, no circumstances have changed that would result in a change to the Company’s prior conclusion.

Upon deconsolidation, the Company performed an analysis of itstwo million common share investment in PFH. The Company determined that based on a combination of its level of voting share ownership (19% of total outstanding voting shares), along with meaningful continued involvement in PFH’s lending and operating activities, the investment met the requirements to be accounted for in accordance with ASC 323, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures. As of the time of deconsolidation and initial application of ASC 323, the Company decided to elect the FVO allowed under ASC 323 and accounted for its investment in PFH common stock as of March 31, 2025 at fair value under ASC 825, Financial Instruments. The FVO is irrevocable and must be used in all future periods following election.

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recognized a gain from deconsolidation of PFH of $25 million, which is recorded in the income statement in “Gains on Panacea Financial Holdings investment” within noninterest income. The gain resulted from recognition, as of the deconsolidation date of March 31, 2025, of the Company’s retained interest in PFH common stock of $21 million, at fair value, and the deconsolidation as of the same date of noncontrolling interest in PFH of $10 million and PFH’s net assets of $6 million. The Company engages a third-party valuation specialist to perform a valuation of the Company’s PFH common shares as of each reporting period, including as of December 31, 2025. The valuation of PFH common stock includes an assessment of the value of PFH primarily using an income approach leveraging a discounted cash flow technique. Key inputs and assumptions in the valuation included projected financial growth of PFH driven by future loan growth assumptions, growth in new services offerings of PFH, and cost savings from fundings provided by customer growth.

Following deconsolidation, the Company continues to originate loans for PFH through its Panacea Division of the Bank, retaining some of the originated loans and selling the remaining. Any loans retained by the Company will be included within net loans in the balance sheet and will be included in the Company’s determination of future expected credit losses, which is the Company’s primary exposure to losses as a result of its continued involvement with PFH. For any originated loans that are intended to be sold, the Company will also include these on its balance sheet until the time of sale but through an agreement with PFH, any exposure to a decline in value prior to sale will be reimbursed to the Company by PFH. The Company will also continue, through the Division, to provide loan origination support to PFH and the servicing of loans retained by the Division.

Following deconsolidation, the Company determined that any transactions between the Company and PFH would be related party transactions under relevant accounting guidance. The primary transactions between the Company and PFH relate to quarterly payments between the parties driven by financial performance of loans originated through the Division of the Bank. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had a payable of $490 thousand included within other liabilities on the balance sheet related to this payment due to PFH. As of December 31, 2025, the Company did not hold any assets on its balance sheet related to PFH that could be used by PFH to settle their obligations. The Company does not have an obligation to provide any future monetary support to PFH. The maximum exposure to loss as of December 31, 2025 as a result of continued involvement with PFH is the common stock investment of $7 million and any potential credit losses on loans originated in the division of the Bank as discussed above.

On June 12, 2025, the Company signed a non-binding term sheet to sell a portion of its retained ownership in PFH common shares after the deconsolidation that generated proceeds to the Company of $22 million. Following the sale of these shares, the Company continued to hold approximately 467 thousand shares in PFH. As of December 31, 2025, the fair value of the Company’s PFH common stock is $7 million, as determined through the use of the valuation specialist and is recorded in the consolidated balance sheet. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recorded gains of

$8 million in the income statement in “Gains on Panacea Financial Holdings investment” within noninterest income related to the sale of PFH common shares and fair value adjustments on its remaining investment.

Disposition of the Life Premium Finance Division

On October 24, 2024, the Company entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with EverBank, N.A. (“EverBank”) for the sale of the Company’s Life Premium Finance division (“LPF”). EverBank acquired LPF from the Company, except for a subset of mostly fixed rate and rate-capped loans that were retained by the Bank. All of the LPF operations, including its employees, were assumed by EverBank following the close of the transaction, which took place in two parts. EverBank acquired approximately$370 million of loans from the division at a$6 million premium at the first close on October 31, 2024. Between the first and second closing on January 31, 2025, EverBank purchased loans generated by the division in ordinary course at par. The Bank provided interim servicing from the first closing until the transition of the business at the final closing when EverBank began servicing the purchased loans and serviced the Bank’s retained portfolio for the duration of the portfolio. From the first closing through December 31, 2024, the Bank sold approximately$400 million of loans and related accrued interest and recorded a pre-tax gain of$5 million, net of advisory and legal fees. As of December 31, 2024, the Bank had an additional$51 million of loans to be sold to EverBank which were recorded in loans held for sale at the lower of cost or market. The Bank subsequently sold approximately$64 million of additional loans at par to EverBank (inclusive of the loans in held for sale at year end) from January 1, 2025 through the second closing on January 31, 2025 at no additional gains.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to change in the near term include: the determination of the allowance for credit losses, the fair value of investment securities and its investment in PFH common stock, the credit impairment of investment securities, the mortgage banking derivatives, interest rate swap derivatives, Consumer Program derivatives, the valuation of goodwill, and deferred tax assets. Management monitors and continually reassess these at each reporting period.

Investment Securities

Securities Available-for-Sale and Held-to Maturity

Debt securities that Primis has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost.

Securities classified as available-for-sale are those debt securities that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, liquidity needs or other similar factors. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses net of deferred taxes, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Gains or losses arising from sale, call, or maturity of the securities are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into noninterest income in the consolidated income statement at the time of sale, call, or maturity. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company restructured its investment portfolio resulting in the sale of $144 million in book value and realization of $15 million in losses previously recorded as part of other comprehensive income (loss). The realized loss on the sale from restructure of the portfolio is recorded in noninterest income during the year ended December 31, 2025, in “Loss on sales of investment securities”.

Premiums and discounts are generally amortized using the interest method with a constant effective yield without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage-backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. Premiums on callable securities are amortized to their earliest call date. Gains and losses on the sale of investment securities are recorded on the settlement date and are determined using the specific identification method.

Primis purchases amortizing investment securities. The actual principal reduction on these assets varies from the expected contractual principal reduction due to principal prepayments resulting from the borrowers’ election to refinance the underlying mortgage based on market and other conditions. The purchased premiums and discounts associated with these assets are amortized or accreted to interest income over the estimated life of the related assets. The estimated life is calculated by projecting future prepayments and the resulting principal cash flows until maturity. Prepayment rate projections utilize actual prepayment speed experience and available market information on like-kind instruments. The prepayment rates form the basis for income recognition of premiums and discounts on the related assets. Changes in prepayment estimates may cause the earnings recognized on these assets to vary over the term that the assets are held, creating volatility in the net interest margin. Prepayment rate assumptions are monitored and updated monthly to reflect actual activity and the most recent market projections.

Non-marketable Equity Securities

Primis has various investments that are considered to be non-marketable equity securities that do not have a readily determinable fair value. Equity securities with no recurring market value data available are reviewed periodically and any observable market value change is adjusted through net income. Primis evaluates these non-marketable equity securities for impairment and recoverability of the recorded investment by considering positive and negative evidence, including the profitability and asset quality, dividend payment history and recent redemption experience. Impairment is assessed at each reporting period and if identified, is recognized in noninterest income.

Other non-marketable investments include stock acquired for regulatory purposes. The Bank is a member of the FHLB system and members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts. The Bank is also required to own FRB stock with a par value equal to 6% of capital. FHLB and FRB stock is carried at cost and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of the par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.

Loans Held for Sale

The PMC loans held for sale are originated and held until sold to permanent investors. The Company has elected to carry these loans at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the fair value option under FASB ASC 825,Financial Instruments. The fair value is determined by utilizing quoted prices from dealers in such loans. Gains and losses on loan sales are recorded in mortgage banking income and direct loan origination costs are included in noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Other loans that the Company has the intent to sell at the balance sheet date have been recorded in loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market. LPF loans as of December 31, 2024 that were originated with the intent to sell to EverBank, as previously discussed, are recorded in held for sale at their par value of $50.7 million, which is the price EverBank paid to purchase the loans in 2025. The Company also made the decision as of December 31, 2024 to sell a majority of its Consumer Program loans, although a buyer had not yet been identified. These loans were transferred to held for sale as of December 31, 2024 and were marked-to-market based on third party bid prices received in its initial marketing efforts for the portfolio. The total transferred to held for sale was $113.2 million which was net of the mark on the portfolio of $20.0 million which was taken in accordance with bank regulatory and U.S. GAAP guidance as a charge to the allowance for credit losses, resulting in the same amount recorded in the provision for credit losses in the consolidated income statement for the year ended December 31, 2024. During 2025, the Company decided it would retain to maturity the Consumer Program Loans it had recorded in held for sale as of December 31, 2024, and transferred the loans back to held for investment at their current book value at the time, which included the previous mark taken at the time of transfer to held for sale.

Loans

Primis provides commercial and consumer loans to customers. Primis also purchases mortgage loans from mortgage loans originators, including PMC. A substantial portion of the loan portfolio is represented by loans secured by real estate throughout its market area. The ability of Primis’ debtors to honor their contracts is in varying degrees dependent upon the real estate market conditions and general economic conditions in their debtor’s market area.

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, including purchased premiums and discounts and any deferred loan fees or costs. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest method without anticipating prepayments.

Commercial real estate loans consist of borrowings secured by owner occupied and non-owner occupied commercial real estate. Repayment of these loans is dependent upon rental income or the subsequent sale of the property for loans secured by non-owner occupied commercial real estate and by cash flows from business operations for owner occupied commercial real estate. Loans for which the source of repayment is rental income are primarily impacted by local economic conditions which dictate occupancy rates and the amount of rent charged. Commercial real estate loans that are dependent on cash flows from operations can also be adversely affected by current market conditions for their product or service.

Construction and land development loans primarily consist of borrowings to purchase and develop raw land into residential and non-residential properties. Construction loans are extended to individuals as well as corporations for the construction of an individual or multiple properties and are secured by raw land and the subsequent improvements. Repayment of the loans to real estate developers is dependent upon the sale or lease of properties to third parties in a timely fashion upon completion. Should there be delays in construction or a downturn in the market for those properties, there may be significant erosion in value which may be absorbed by Primis.

Commercial loans consist of borrowings for commercial purposes to individuals, corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, and other business enterprises. Commercial loans are generally secured by business assets such as equipment, accounts receivable, inventory, or any other asset excluding real estate and generally made to finance capital expenditures or operations. Primis’ risk exposure is related to deterioration in the value of collateral securing the loan should foreclosure become necessary. Generally, business assets used or produced in operations do not maintain their value upon foreclosure which may require Primis to write-down the value significantly to sell. Commercial loans also include Life Premium Finance loans. These loans are utilized to pay the annual premiums due on the whole or universal life policy. The Life Premium Finance loans are fully secured by the cash value of the policy and personal liquid assets of the borrower or guarantor.

Residential real estate loans consist of loans to individuals for the purchase of primary residences with repayment primarily through wage or other income sources of the individual borrower. Primis’ loss exposure to these loans is dependent on local market conditions for residential properties as loan amounts are determined, in part, by the fair value of the property at origination.

Other consumer loans are comprised of loans to individuals both unsecured and secured and home equity loans secured by real estate (closed and open-end), with repayment dependent on individual wages and other income. Other consumer loans also include Life Premium Finance loans and Panacea Financial consumer loans comprising of student loan refinancing and PRN loans. PRN loans may be utilized by graduating doctors to fund costs as they move into their chosen professions. The risk of loss on consumer loans is elevated as the collateral securing these loans, if any, may rapidly depreciate in value or may be worthless and/or difficult to locate if repossession is necessary. Losses in this portfolio are generally relatively low, however, due to the small individual loan size and the balance outstanding as a percentage of Primis’ entire portfolio. Also included in other consumer loans are the Consumer Program loans as more fully described below in the Third Party Originated and Serviced Consumer Loan Portfolio section of this footnote.

The accrual of interest on all loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the credit is well secured and in process of collection. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal and interest is considered doubtful.

All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Most of Primis’ business activity is with customers located within Virginia and Maryland with some consumer loans’ customer base on a national platform. Therefore, our exposure to credit risk is significantly affected by changes in the economy in those areas. We are not dependent on any single customer or group of customers whose insolvency would have a material adverse effect on operations.

Allowance for Credit Losses

Allowance For Credit Losses - Held-to-Maturity Securities

The allowance for credit losses on held-to-maturity securities is a contra-asset valuation account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326 that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of held-to-maturity securities to present management's best estimate of the net amount expected to be collected. Held-to-maturity securities are charged-off against the allowance when deemed uncollectible by management. Adjustments to the allowance are reported in our income statement as a component of credit loss expense. Management measures expected credit losses on held-to-maturity securities on a collective basis by major security type with each type sharing similar risk characteristics and considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Management has made the accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest receivable on held-to-maturity securities from the estimate of credit losses due to the inclusion in its nonaccrual policy. Further information regarding our policies and methodology used to estimate the allowance for credit losses on held-to-maturity securities is presented in Note 2 – Investment Securities.

Allowance For Credit Losses - Available-for-Sale Securities

For available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position, we first assess whether (i) we intend to sell or (ii) it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either case is affirmative, any previously recognized allowances are charged-off and the security's amortized cost is written down to fair value through income. If neither case is affirmative, the security is evaluated to determine whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, management considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency and any adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income. Adjustments to the allowance are reported in our income statement as a component of credit loss expense. Management has made the accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest receivable on available-for-sale securities from the estimate of credit losses due to the inclusion in its nonaccrual policy. Available-for-sale securities are charged-off against the allowance or, in the absence of any allowance, written down through income when deemed uncollectible by management or when either of the aforementioned criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met.

Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans

The accounting policy related to the allowance for credit losses is considered a critical policy given the level of estimation, judgment, and uncertainty in the levels of the allowance required to account for the expected losses in the loan portfolio and the material effect such estimation, judgment, and uncertainty can have on the consolidated financial results.

The allowance for credit losses on loans is a contra-asset valuation account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326, which is deducted from the amortized cost basis of loans to present management's best estimate of the net amount expected to be collected. Loans are charged-off against the allowance when deemed uncollectible by management. Expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off. Adjustments to the allowance are reported in our income statement as a component of credit loss expense. Management has made the accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest receivable on loans from the estimate of credit losses due to the inclusion in its nonaccrual policy. Further information regarding our policies and methodology used to estimate the allowance for credit losses on loans is presented in Note 3 – Loans and Allowance For Credit Losses.

Allowance For Credit Losses - Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures

The allowance for credit losses on off-balance-sheet credit exposures is a liability account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326, representing expected credit losses over the contractual period for which we are exposed to credit risk resulting from a contractual obligation to extend credit. No allowance is recognized if we have the unconditional right to cancel the obligation. The allowance is reported as a component of other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Adjustments to the allowance are reported in our income statement as a component of other expenses. Further information regarding our policies and methodology used to estimate the allowance for credit losses on off-balance-sheet credit exposures is presented in Note 15 – Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk.

Third-Party Originated and Serviced Consumer Loan Portfolio

In the second half of 2021, the Company partnered with a TPOS to originate and service unsecured consumer loans through their proprietary point-of-sale technology (the “Consumer Program”). Loan options under the Consumer Program include traditional fully-amortizing loans and promotional loans with no interest, or “same-as-cash”, features if the loan is fully repaid in the promotional window. The loans are originated at par in the Bank’s name and have a term of 5 to 12 years with a much shorter effective life due to amortization and pay downs.

The Consumer Program is governed by multiple interrelated agreements including the loan agreement between the Bank and the customer and agreements with the TPOS. The structure of the Consumer Program is intended to generate loans that yields a targeted return to the Bank on a portfolio basis while also providing limited credit enhancement from the TPOS. Key characteristics of the combined arrangement include:

Agreements with multiple counterparties, such as the customer and TPOS, are generally required to be accounted for separately in accordance with U.S. GAAP relevant to each unit of account even if the agreements are highly interrelated. As a result, the Company accounts for the Consumer Program under multiple units of account as follows:

discounted for the time value of money with the discount amortized over the remaining life of the loan.

The Company had $90 million and $152 million of amortized cost balance of loans outstanding in the Consumer Program as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, or 3% and 5%, respectively of our total gross loan portfolio as of each date. As of December 31, 2024, $113 million was included in loans held for sale at lower of cost or market, and $39 million in the consumer loans category in loans held for investment. Loans in the Consumer Program are included within the Consumer Loan category disclosures in Note 3 - Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses. As of December 31, 2025,3% of the loans, or $3 million, were in a promotional period, with 80% of these promotional loan periods ending through the second quarter of 2026.

In the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company made the decision to cease originating new loans under the Consumer Program effective January 31, 2025 and moved a large portion of the portfolio, with an amortized cost of $133 million, to loans held for sale and marked them to the lower of cost or fair market value. The adjustment to fair market value resulted in additional provision expense and charge-offs of $20 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. The remaining portion of the portfolio of approximately $39 million remained classified as held for investment as of December 31, 2024. During the first quarter of 2025 the Company made the decision to retain until their maturity or payoff the loans previously transferred to held for sale. The loans were transferred back to held for investment at their then current amortized cost basis at the time of transfer, which included the previous fair market value adjustment as required by applicable accounting guidance.

Transfers of Financial Assets

The Company follows the guidance in ASC 860,Transfers and Servicing, when accounting for loan participations and other partial loan sales. Transfers of an entire financial asset (i.e. loan sales), a group of entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset (i.e. loan participations sold) are accounted for as sales when control over the assets have been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. Participations or other partial loan sales that do not meet the definition of a participating interest would remain on the balance sheet and the proceeds are recorded as a secured borrowing. Secured borrowings are initially recorded at fair value which corresponds to the proceeds received for the transfer of the assets, and any failed sale discount is amortized into income over the life of the related asset.

The Company retains servicing rights on the loans sold and records a servicing asset for each of the sold loans at the time of sale if certain criteria is met. Subsequent to the date of transfer, the Company can elect to measure servicing assets under the amortization method. Under the amortization method, servicing assets are amortized in proportion to, and over

the period of, estimated net servicing income. The amortization of servicing assets is analyzed each reporting period and is adjusted to reflect changes in prepayment speeds, as well as other factors. Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based on the fair value of those assets. Impairment is determined by assessing the servicing assets based on groupings of predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate and loan type. If, by servicing asset grouping, the carrying amount of the servicing assets exceeds fair value, a valuation allowance is established through a charge to earnings. The valuation allowance is adjusted as the fair value changes. The Company recorded an immaterial amount of impairment of its servicing assets during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. Servicing assets are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company also retains servicing rights on loans transferred under secured borrowings, but in accordance with GAAP does not record a servicing asset.

The principal balance of loans transferred during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 that qualified as sales was $61 million and $392 million, respectively, while the principal balance transferred that was accounted for as secured borrowings was $0 million and $1 million, respectively. The Company recorded $0 million and $100 thousand of servicing assets during the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, in connection with the transfer of loans that qualified as sales. See Note 10 – Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other Borrowings – for additional information on transfers accounted for as secured borrowings.

Bank Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Buildings and related components are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives of 30 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the terms of the related leases including lease renewals only when the Company is reasonably assured of the aggregate term of the lease. Furniture, fixtures, equipment and software are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years.

Assets Held for Sale

The Company classifies its assets as held for sale in accordance with FASB ASC 360,Property, Plant, and Equipment. When assets are identified as held for sale, the Company discontinues depreciating (amortizing) the assets and estimates the fair value, net of selling costs, of such assets. Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of the net carrying amount of the assets or the estimated net fair value. If the estimated net fair value of the assets held for sale is less than the net carrying amount of the assets, an impairment charge is recorded in the income statement.

The Company assesses the net fair value of assets held for sale each reporting period the assets remain classified as held for sale. Subsequent changes, if any, in the net fair value of the assets held for sale that require an adjustment to the carrying amount are recorded in the income statement, unless the adjustment causes the carrying amount of the assets to exceed the net carrying amount upon initial classification as held for sale.

If circumstances arise that the Company previously considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell assets previously classified as held for sale, they are reclassified to another classification. Assets that are reclassified are measured at the lower of (a) their carrying amount before they were classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the assets remained in their previous classification, or (b) their fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.

Operating Leases

The Company leases certain properties and equipment under operating leases. The Company recognizes a liability to make lease payments, the operating lease liability, and an asset representing the right to use the underlying asset during the lease term, the right-of-use asset. In recognizing lease right-of-use assets and related lease liabilities, the Company accounts for lease and non-lease components (such as taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance costs) separately as such amounts are generally readily determinable under the lease contracts. The operating lease liability is measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at inception. The right-of-use asset is measured at the amount of the operating lease liability adjusted for the remaining balance of any

lease incentives received, any cumulative prepaid or accrued rent if the lease payments are uneven throughout the lease term, any unamortized initial direct costs, and any impairment of the right-of-use-asset. Lease expense consists of a single lease cost calculated so that the remaining cost of the lease is allocated over the remaining lease term on a straight-line basis, variable lease payments not included in the operating lease liability, and any impairment of the right-of-use asset. Lease renewal options are generally not included in the calculation of the operating lease liabilities, unless they are not reasonably certain to be exercised. The Company does not recognize short-term leases on the balance sheets.

In December 2025 the Company entered into an Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Property (the “Sale Agreement”) with entities affiliated with MountainSeed Real Estate Services, LLC and Fortress Investment Group (“Buyer”). The Sale Agreement provided for the sale to the Buyer of 18 properties owned and operated as retail banking branches of the Bank (the “Properties”) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $58 million. Concurrent with the closing, Seller and FNLR Mud LLC (“Lessor”) entered into a master lease agreement (the “Lease Agreement”) for the Properties under which the Bank, as tenant, will lease each of the Properties from Lessor. The initial lease term shall be 20 years, which may be extended, at the Bank’s option, for an additional 20 year term. The Lease Agreement shall constitute a triple net lease under which the Bank as tenant shall be responsible for base rent for each of the Properties, which during the initial term shall be, in the aggregate, $5 million per annum (“Base Rent”) plus additional operational charges. Base Rent shall increase by 2% per annum for each year during the initial term and any renewal term. The transaction was accounted for as a sale-leaseback under applicable accounting guidance and the Company recorded a gain of $51 million within noninterest income in its consolidated income statement during the year ended December 31, 2025. The Company also recorded new right of use assets of $57 million and lease liabilities of $51 million in its consolidated balance sheet in December 2025 associated with the sale-leaseback transaction.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The Company follows ASC 350,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which prescribes the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to initial recognition. Goodwill resulting from business combinations is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or circumstances warrant. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on our consolidated balance sheets.

The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment analysis on September 30 th of each year with the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below the operating segment level, which is referred to as a component. The Company’s reporting units for goodwill are itstwo primary operating segments, Primis Bank and PMC. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired. The Company completed the annual goodwill impairment testing for itstwo reporting units as of September 30, 2025 and concluded that the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of their carrying amounts and no impairment charge was required. The Company performed a qualitative assessment to identify any triggering events as of December 31, 2025 and determined there were not any triggering events that would indicate that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of either reporting unit was less than its carrying value.

To determine the fair value of the Bank and PMC reporting units, the Company utilizes a combination of three or four valuation approaches: the comparable transactions approach, the control premium approach, the public market peers control premium approach, and the discounted cash flow approach. The comparable transactions approach is based on pricing ratios recently paid in the sale or merger of comparable banking franchises; the control premium approach is based on the Company’s trading price, adjusted for holding company assets and an industry based control premium; the public market peers control premium approach is based on market pricing ratios of public banking companies adjusted for an industry based control premium; and the discounted cash flow approach considers the earnings and cash flows that a hypothetical acquirer could realize in an acquisition of the reporting unit. Assumptions that are used as part of these calculations include: the selection of comparable publicly-traded companies and selection of market comparable acquisition transactions. In addition, other assumptions include a discount rate, economic conditions that impact the

assumptions related to interest and growth rates, the control premium associated with the reporting unit, and a relative weight given to the valuations derived by the valuation methods.

Other intangible assets consist of core deposit intangible assets arising from whole-bank and branch acquisitions and other intangibles from the PMC acquisition and are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from 6 to 15 years.

Stock-Based Compensation

Compensation cost is recognized for stock options issued to employees, based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes option-pricing model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options. Compensation cost for grants of restricted shares is accounted for based on the closing price of Primis’ common stock on the date the restricted shares are awarded. Compensation cost for stock options and restricted shares is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Compensation cost for restricted stock unit awards that contain performance conditions is measured based on the grant date fair value of the units, adjusted for the Company’s best estimate of the outcome of vesting conditions at the end of the performance period.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance

Primis has purchased, and acquired through acquisitions, life insurance policies on certain former and current key executives. Bank-owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.

Cloud Computing Arrangement Assets

Primis engaged third-parties to define, design, and develop a new cloud-based banking core for the Company. The multiple phases of the cloud computing arrangement assets are assessed and reviewed as the software is placed into production. Total costs paid is capitalized upon initial launch and production rollout. Amortization is based on the estimated life of the core infrastructure as it relates to obsolescence, technology, competition, and the nature of changes in software. Operating costs such as monthly licensing, usage, and storage are expensed as incurred in data processing expense in our income statements. As of both December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had gross cloud computing arrangement assets of $15 million and accumulated amortization of $10 million and $7 million, respectively.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Premises and equipment, cloud computing arrangement assets, right of use assets, and other long-term assets (other than goodwill and intangibles) are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are recorded at fair value.

Derivative Instruments

Derivatives are financial instruments that meet the criteria in ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging, to be recognized as either freestanding or embedded derivatives. The Company’s derivatives are recognized as either assets or liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded through noninterest income inthe Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Primis does not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Consumer Program Derivative

The Bank has an agreement with a third-party to originate and service consumer loans that are included in the Bank’s loan portfolio. The third-party provides a target return to the Company on the portfolio of loans and all interest received from borrowers above the target return is paid to the third-party as a performance fee. The third-party also provides

reimbursement for lost interest when the borrower’s note has a promotional feature that waives accrued interest if the loan is paid in full before the promotional period ends and credit support to the Company in periods when the target return on the portfolio is not achieved. This agreement to pay the third-party performance fees and to receive reimbursement of waived interest and certain credit support meets the definition of a derivative financial instrument. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recorded an asset of immaterial valueand$5 million, respectively, in its Consolidated Balance Sheets in the line “Consumer Program derivative asset”. See Note 4 - Derivatives, for additional information about the derivative and the assumptions used to determine its value.

Mortgage Banking Derivatives and Financial Instruments

Mortgage loan commitments known as IRLCs that relate to the origination of a mortgage that will be held for sale upon funding are considered derivative instruments under the derivatives accounting guidance in ASC 815*,* Derivatives and Hedging. Loan commitments that are classified as derivatives are recognized at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in other assets and other liabilities with changes in their fair values recorded in mortgage banking income in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

TBA is a contract to buy or sell mortgage-backed securities on a specific date while the underlying mortgages are not announced until just prior to settlement. These TBA trades provide an economic hedge against the effect of changes in interest rates resulting from interest rate lock commitments. TBAs are accounted for under the derivatives accounting guidance in ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedgingwhen either of the following conditions exist: (i) when settlement of the TBA trade is not expected to occur at the next regular settlement date (which is typically the next month) or (ii) a mechanism exists to settle the contract on a net basis. As a result, these instruments are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets as other assets and other liabilities with changes in their fair values recorded in mortgage banking income in the income statements. The fair value of the TBA trades is based on the gain or loss that would occur if the Company were to pair-off the trade at the measurement date.

Forward loan sale commitments are commitments to sell individual mortgage loans using both best efforts and mandatory delivery at a fixed price to an investor at a future date. Forward loan sale commitments that are mandatory delivery are accounted for as derivatives and carried at fair value, determined as the amount that would be necessary to settle the derivative financial instrument at the balance sheet date. Forward loan sale commitments that are best efforts are not derivatives but can be and have been accounted for at fair value, determined in a similar manner to those that are mandatory delivery. Forward loan sale commitments are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as other assets and other liabilities with changes in their fair values recorded in mortgage banking income in the income statements.

As of December 31, 2025, the Company recorded an assetof$2 million and liability of$1 million in its Consolidated Balance Sheets in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, related to IRLCs, TBAs, andforward loan sale commitments (“mortgage banking derivatives”). As of December 31, 2024, the Company recorded an asset of$1 million andno liability in its Consolidated Balance Sheets in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, related to IRLCs, TBAs, and mortgage banking derivatives. See Note 4 - Derivatives for further discussion and assumptions used to value the derivatives.

Interest Rate Swaps

The Company is subject to interest rate risk exposure in the normal course of business through its core lending operations. Primarily to help mitigate interest rate risk associated with its loan portfolio, the Company entered into interest rate swaps in May and August 2024 with a large U.S. financial institution as the counterparty. Interest rate swaps are contractual agreements whereby one party pays a floating interest rate on a notional principal amount and receives a fixed-rate payment on the same notional principal, or vice versa, for a fixed period of time. Interest rate swaps change in value with movements in benchmark interest rates, such as Prime or the SOFR. Interest rate swaps subject the Company to market risk associated with changes in interest rates, changes in interest rate volatility, as well as the credit risk that the counterparty will fail to perform. The Company’s interest rate swaps are pay-fixed and receive-floating whereby the Company receives a variable rate of interest based on SOFR.

The Company’s interest rate swaps meet the definition of derivative instruments under ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging, and are accounted for both initially and subsequently at their fair value. The Company assessed the derivative instruments at inception and determined they met the requirements under ASC 815 to be accounted for as fair value hedges. Fair value hedge relationships mitigate exposure to the change in fair value of the hedged risk in an asset, liability or firm commitment. The Company’s interest rate swaps are fair value hedges that are accounted for using the portfolio layer method, which allows the Company to hedge the interest rate risk of prepayable loans by designating as the hedged item a stated amount of two separate and distinct closed portfolios of consumer and commercial loans that are expected to be outstanding for the designated hedge periods. Under the fair value hedging model, gains or losses attributable to the change in fair value of the derivative instruments, as well as the gains and losses attributable to the change in fair value of the hedged items, are recognized in interest income in the same income statement line item with the hedged item in the period in which the change in fair value occurs. The corresponding adjustment to the hedged asset or liability are included in the basis of the hedged items, while the corresponding change in the fair value of the derivative instruments are recorded as an adjustment to other assets or other liabilities, as applicable. The Company presents interest rate swaps on the balance sheets on a net basis when a right of offset exists, based on transactions with a single counterparty and any cash collateral paid to and/or received from that counterparty are subject to legally enforceable master netting arrangements. As of December 31, 2025, the gross amounts of interest rate swap derivative assets and liabilities were $100 thousand and $300 thousand, respectively, and are recorded net in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2024, the gross amounts of interest rate swap derivative assets andliabilities were $1 million and $300 thousand, respectively, and are recorded net in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

The following table represents the carrying value of the portfolio layer method hedged assets and the cumulative fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying value of the hedged assets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024:

One of the Company’s interest rate swaps matured in 2025 and the remaining two interest rate swaps mature in May and August of 2026. Additional information on derivative instruments can be found in Note 5 – Fair Value.

Retirement Plans

Employee 401(k) plan expense is the amount of matching contributions from the Company. Primis matches 100% of the first 3% of the employee contribution, and 50% of the next 3% (maximum of 4.5% match). Supplemental retirement plan expense incurred by the Company is accrued based on a future obligation to provide benefits to retired executives over a certain number of years after their service to the Company concludes.

Loss Contingencies

Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there are such matters that will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Dividend Restriction

Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the Bank to Primis or by Primis to shareholders.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs expensed during the year ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 were $2 million in each year.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. We haveno unrecognized tax benefits and do not anticipate any increase in unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months. Should the accrual of any interest or penalties relative to unrecognized tax benefits be necessary, it is our policy to record such accruals in our income tax accounts; no such accruals exist as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.

Restrictions on Cash

No regulatory reserve or clearing requirements with the FRB were needed as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.

Cash and cash equivalents

Primis defines cash and cash equivalents as cash due from financial institutions, interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold in other financial institutions with maturities less than 90 days.

Earnings Per Share

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to Primis’ common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to net income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by Primis relate solely to outstanding stock options, restricted stock awards, and restricted stock units and are determined using the treasury stock method. Performance awards cannot be dilutive until the Company’s best estimate of the outcome of vesting conditions become probable. Note 16 – Earnings per Share, provides additional information related to our EPS calculation.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available-for-sale which are also recognized as a separate component of equity.

Off-Balance Sheet Credit Related Financial Instruments

In the ordinary course of business, Primis has entered into commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay.

Fair Value Measurements

In general, fair values of financial instruments are based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon observable market-based parameters. Valuation assumptions may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These assumptions may reflect assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation assumptions are applied consistently over time.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09,Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. This ASU requires annual disclosure of certain information relating to the rate reconciliation, income taxes paid by jurisdiction, income (or loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense (or benefit) disaggregated between domestic and foreign, and income tax expense (or benefit) from continuing operations disaggregated by federal, state, and foreign. The ASU also eliminates certain requirements relating to unrecognized tax benefits and certain deferred tax disclosure relating to subsidiaries and corporate joint ventures. The Company adopted the ASU prospectively and applied the enhanced disclosures to the current year disclosures, as required by the ASU, in this year’s financial statements. See Note 12 - Income Taxes, for additional information.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03,Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40). This ASU requires more disclosures about specific types of expenses included in the expense captions presented on the face of the income statement as well as disclosures about selling expenses but does not change the requirements for the presentation of expenses on the face of the income statement. In January 2025, FASB issued an update ASU 2025-01,Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), clarifying the effective date. The amendments in this standard will be effective for the Company’s annual disclosures beginning for the year ended December 31, 2027, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2028, and is required to be applied prospectively, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-03*, Business Combinations (Topic 805) and Consolidation (Topic 810) – Determining the Accounting Acquirer in the Acquisition of a Variable Interest Entity*. This ASU modifies the Topic 805 framework for identifying the accounting acquirer in certain business combinations when the legal acquiree is a VIE. Existing guidance states the primary beneficiary is the accounting acquirer of a VIE in a business combination even if Topic 805’s general factors used to identify the accounting acquirer (which apply to other business combinations) suggest that the transaction would otherwise be a reverse acquisition. This ASU modifies existing guidance by limiting situations in which entities must identify the primary beneficiary as the accounting acquirer in certain business combinations and requiring entities to consider the general factors in Topic 805 when a business combination involving a VIE is primarily affected through exchanging equity interests. The ASU is to be applied prospectively to annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 for all entities, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06,Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) – Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-use Software. This ASU is intended to modernize old internal-use software guidance that is twenty years old to adapt to the agile (i.e., iterative and flexible) basis predominantly used to develop software today. The key changes to the guidance include (i) eliminating accounting consideration of software project development stages, (ii) enhancing the guidance around the ‘probable-to-complete’ threshold, (iii) modifying the website development costs guidance by eliminating Subtopic 350-50 and relocating any remaining relevant guidance into Subtopic 350-40, and (iv) providing new examples to illustrate the applications of the updated guidance. The ASU allows entities to adopt the guidance either (1) retrospectively, (2) prospectively to software costs incurred after the adoption date (i.e. on existing, in-process software projects or new projects) or (3) on a modified prospective basis. The ASU is effective for the Company starting in annual and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-07,Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Derivatives Scope Refinements and Scope Clarification for Share-Based Noncash Consideration from a Customer in a Revenue Contract. This ASU expands the population of contracts that are excluded from the scope of derivative accounting. It also clarifies that the revenue guidance in ASC 606 initially applies to share-based noncash consideration received from a customer for the transfer of goods or services. The ASU adds a scope exception from derivative accounting for nonexchange traded contracts with underlyings based on operations or activities specific to one of the parties to the contract. The ASU also clarifies that the revenue guidance in ASC 606 applies initially to share-based noncash consideration (e.g., shares, share options or other equity instruments) received from a customer for

the transfer of goods or services. The guidance in other ASCs, including derivatives (ASC 815) and equity securities (ASC 321), is not applied unless and until the entity’s right to receive or retain the share-based noncash consideration is unconditional under ASC 606. The ASU allows entities to adopt the guidance either prospectively or on a modified retrospective basis. The ASU is effective for the Company starting in annual and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2026, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potent impact of adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-08,*Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) – Purchased Loans.*This ASU expands the use of the gross-up method to certain acquired loans beyond those that are purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The gross-up method records an allowance for credit losses at the acquisition date with an offsetting entry to the asset’s amortized cost basis. The ASU applies the gross-up method to acquired non- PCD assets that are ‘purchased seasoned loans’ and provides criteria for determining whether acquired loans qualify as purchased seasoned loans; for purchased seasoned loans, eliminates the Day 1-credit loss expense and reduces interest income recognized in subsequent periods; keeps the guidance for PCD assets unchanged; and results in narrow subsequent measurement differences between purchased seasoned loans and PCD assets. The amendments in ASU 2025-08 are effective for the Company for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and can be adopted prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company cannot predict the impact of applying this ASU on its consolidated financial statements when adopted in the future because it is dependent on future amounts of assets acquired that are within its scope at acquisition.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11,*Interim reporting (Topic 270) – Narrow-Scope Improvements.*This ASU primarily amends FASB ASC 270,Interim Reporting, clarifying the applicability of the interim reporting guidance, the types of interim reporting, and the form and content of interim financial statements. The amendments in ASU 2025-11 are effective for the Company for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. This ASU can be applied prospectively or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the potent impact of adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

2. INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair value of AFS investment securities and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows ($ in thousands):

The amortized cost, gross unrecognized gains and losses, allowance for credit losses and fair value of investment securities HTM were as follows ($ in thousands):

During 2025, 2024 and 2023, AFS securities of $92 million, $43 million and $15 million, respectively, were purchased. No HTM investment securities were purchased in 2025, 2024 and 2023.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company restructured its investment portfolio resulting in the sale of $144 million in book value of investment securities and realization of $15 million in losses that are recorded in noninterest income in the consolidated income statement. No investment securities were sold during 2024 or 2023.

The amortized cost and fair value of AFS and HTM investment securities as of December 31, 2025, by contractual maturity, are as follows ($ in thousands). Investment securities not due at a single maturity date are shown separately.

Investment securities with a carrying amount of approximately $26 million and $141 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, certain other deposits, a line of credit for advances from the FHLB of Atlanta and repurchase agreements.

Management measures expected credit losses on HTM securities on a collective basis by major security type with each type sharing similar risk characteristics and considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Regarding U.S. Treasury and residential mortgage-backed securities issued by the U.S. government, or agencies thereof, it is expected that the securities will not be settled at prices less than the amortized cost basis of the securities as such securities are backed by the full faith and credit of and/or guaranteed by the U.S. government. Accordingly, no allowance for credit losses has been recorded for these securities. Regarding securities issued by states and political subdivisions and other HTM securities, management considers (i) issuer bond ratings, (ii) historical loss rates for given bond ratings, (iii) whether issuers continue to make timely principal and interest payments under the contractual terms of the securities and (iv) internal forecasts. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Primis did not have a material allowance for credit losses on HTM securities.

As of December 31, 2025, there were 40 investment securities AFS that were in an unrealized loss position. The unrealized losses related to investment securities AFS relate to changes in interest rates relative to when the investment securities were purchased, and do not indicate credit-related impairment. Primis performs quantitative analysis and if needed, a qualitative analysis in this determination. As a result of the Company’s analysis, none of the securities were deemed to require an allowance for credit loss. Primis has the ability and intent to retain these securities for a period of time sufficient to recover all unrealized losses.

The following tables present information regarding investment securities AFS and HTM in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 by duration of time in a loss position ($ in thousands):

3. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

The following table summarizes the composition of our loan portfolio as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):

Loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or market

As of December 31, 2024, $113 million of Consumer Program loans and $51 million of life premium finance loans were included in loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or market, based on the Company’s decision to sell the loans. The life premium finance loans were sold during the year ended December 31, 2025. At March 31, 2025, the Company determined it would no longer sell the Consumer Program loans and has the intent and ability to hold these loans for the foreseeable future as it intends to run off the portfolio and therefore transferred the loans back to the consumer loans category within loans held for investment at their amortized cost of $102 million as of that date.

Consumer Program Loans

The Company has $90 million and $152 million of amortized cost balance of loans outstanding in the Consumer Program as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, or 3% and 5%, respectively, of our total gross loan portfolio as of each date. Loans in the Consumer Program are included within the consumer loans category disclosures in this footnote as of December 31, 2025. As of December 31, 2024, $113 million is included in loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or market, and $39 million in the consumer loans category in loans held for investment. As of December 31, 2025,3% of the loans were in a promotional period requiring no payment of interest, with 80% of these promotional loan periods ending through the second quarter of 2026.

Accrued Interest Receivable

Accrued interest receivable on loans totaled $18 million and $17 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans

Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payment obligations as they become due, as well as when required by regulatory provisions. In determining whether or not a borrower may be unable to meet payment obligations for each class of loans, we consider the borrower’s debt service capacity through the analysis of current financial information, if available, and/or current information with regards to our collateral position. Regulatory provisions typically require the placement of a loan on nonaccrual status if (i) principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection or (ii) full payment of principal and interest is not expected. Loans may be placed on nonaccrual status regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent that cash payments are received in excess of principal due. A loan may be returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future principal and interest amounts contractually due are reasonably assured, which is typically evidenced by a sustained period (at least six months) of repayment performance by the borrower.

The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of loans held for investment as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):

The amortized cost, by class, of loans and leases on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, were as follows ($ in thousands):

There were $2 million of PPP loans greater than 90 days past due and still accruing as of both December 31, 2025 and 2024.

The following table presents nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2025 by class and year of origination ($ in thousands):

Interest received on nonaccrual loans was $500 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2025 and immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Modifications Provided to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty

The Bank determines that a borrower may be experiencing financial difficulty if the borrower is currently delinquent on any of its debt, or if the Bank is concerned that the borrower may not be able to perform in accordance with the current terms of the loan agreement in the foreseeable future. Many aspects of the borrower’s financial situation are assessed when determining whether they are experiencing financial difficulty, particularly for commercial borrowers due to the complex nature of the loan structure, business/industry risk and borrower/guarantor structures. Concessions may include the reduction of an interest rate at a rate lower than current market rates for a new loan with similar risk, extension of the maturity date, reduction of accrued interest, or principal forgiveness. When evaluating whether a concession has been granted, the Bank also considers whether the borrower has provided additional collateral or guarantors and whether such additions adequately compensate the Bank for the restructured terms, or if the revised terms are consistent with those currently being offered to new loan customers.

The assessments of whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty at the time a concession has been granted is inherently subjective in nature, and management’s judgment is required when determining whether the concession results in a modification that is accounted for as a new loan or a continuation of the existing loan under GAAP.

Although each occurrence is unique to the borrower and is evaluated separately, for all portfolio segments, loans modified as a result of borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are typically modified through reductions in interest rates, reductions in payments, changing the payment terms from principal and interest to interest only, and/or extensions in term maturity.

The allowance for credit losses incorporates an estimate of lifetime expected credit losses and is recorded on each asset upon asset origination or acquisition. The starting point for the estimate of the allowance for credit losses is historical loss information, which includes losses from modifications of receivables to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. Because the effect of most modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty is already included in the allowance for credit losses because of the measurement methodologies used to estimate the allowance, a change to the allowance for credit losses is generally not recorded upon modification. Occasionally, the Company modifies certain loans by providing principal forgiveness. When principal forgiveness is provided, the amortized cost basis of the loan is written

off against the allowance. The amount of the principal forgiveness is deemed to be uncollectible; therefore, that portion of the loan is written off, resulting in a reduction of the amortized cost basis and a corresponding adjustment to the allowance for credit losses.

If it is determined that a modified loan (or portion of a loan) has subsequently been deemed uncollectible, the loan (or a portion of the loan) is written off. At that time, the amortized cost basis of the loan is reduced by the uncollectible amount and the allowance for credit losses is adjusted by the same amount.

The following table provides a summary of the amortized cost basis of loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty during the year ended December 31, 2025 and the related percentage of the class of the loan portfolio period-end balance by the type of modification as of December 31, 2025, excluding Consumer Program loans ($ in thousands):

The following table depicts the performance of loans as of December 31, 2025, at amortized cost, that have been modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty in the last 12 months ($ in thousands):* *

Consumer Program Modifications

The Company began offering modifications to Consumer Program borrowers beginning on January 1, 2025, in an attempt to enhance collections of delinquent loans and mitigate charge-offs. The primary type of modifications were principal forgiveness of portions of outstanding principal owed and a combination of term modifications to extend maturity dates and interest rate reductions (primarily on promotional loans).

The following table provides a summary of the loan modifications to Consumer Program borrowers experiencing financial difficulty during the year ended December 31, 2025, by the type of modification ($ in thousands):

The following table provides a status as of December 31, 2025, of the amortized cost of Consumer Program loans modified since January 1, 2025 by the type of modification ($ in thousands):

Credit Quality Indicators

Through its system of internal controls, Primis evaluates and segments loan portfolio credit quality using regulatory definitions for Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful. Special Mention loans are considered “criticized”, while loans classified as Substandard or Doubtful are considered “classified”.

Special Mention loans are loans that have a potential weakness that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position.

Substandard loans may be inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful loans have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as Substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, based on currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable or improbable. Primis hadone loan classified as Doubtful as of December 31, 2025 andnone as of December 31, 2024.

In monitoring credit quality trends in the context of assessing the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses on loans, we monitor portfolio credit quality by the weighted-average risk grade of each class of loan.

The following table presents weighted-average risk grades for all loans, by class and year of origination/renewal as of December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):