Senseonics Holdings, Inc.

From time to time, we are subject to litigation and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently believe that the final outcome of these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business. Legal proceedings, including litigation, government investigations and enforcement actions could result in material costs, occupy significant management resources and entail civil and criminal penalties.

In May 2024, the Company received notice and accepted service of a civil complaint that had been filed in the Eastern District of Texas and styled Cellspin Soft, Inc. vs. Senseonics Holdings, Inc., and Ascensia Diabetes Care Holdings AG Case No. 2:24-cv 263. The case was filed by a non-practicing entity alleging patent infringement of three patents. The validity of all three of these patents currently is being challenged inInter Partes Review proceedings at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”) by another party, TikTok Inc., (the TikTok IPR”) and on September 30, 2024, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board instituted a review with respect to each of the asserted claims in these three patents. Together with LifeScan, Inc. and Ascensia, on October 30, 2024, we filed a joint motion to join the TikTok IPR as well as our own independent, similarInter Partes Review challenges to these patents. On February 5, 2025, the court issued an order staying the proceedings in the Eastern District of Texas pending resolution of theInter Partes Reviews. On June 5, 2025, prior to the imminent TikTok IPR final hearings, the Acting Director of the USPTO ordered asua spontereview by the Acting Director of whether the TikTok IPR could proceed based on certain novel issues relating to TikTok’s Chinese ownership status. TheInter Partes Review proceedings are all stayed pending the outcome of thesua sponte Director’s review. The timing of this review is uncertain. Were the TikTok IPR terminated, it is our belief that our independentInter Partes Review should continue because the issues raised in the challenge to the TikTok IPR are not relevant to our filings. Should any asserted claim in the three patents survive the invalidity challenge in theInter Partes Review proceedings, the Company intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

Except as described above, we are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings, and we are not aware of any pending or threatened legal proceeding against us that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition.