ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP INC

Shareholders and Board of Directors

Encore Capital Group, Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Encore Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and our report dated February 26, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Estimate of Expected Future Recoveries on Purchased Credit Deteriorated Assets

As described in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s investment in receivable portfolios, net balance was approximately $3.8 billion at December 31, 2024 and the resulting changes in recoveries for the year ended December 31, 2024 was a decrease of $89.7 million. As more fully described in Notes 1 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, investment in receivable portfolios, net is comprised of purchased loans that have experienced significant deterioration of credit quality since origination. In accordance with the Company’s charge-off policy, each individual loan is deemed to be uncollectible. Receivable portfolio purchases are aggregated based on similar risk characteristics (“pool”), and a negative allowance is established based on expected future recoveries of the pool using a discounted cash flow approach. Subsequent changes (favorable and unfavorable) in expected future recoveries are recognized within changes in recoveries in the consolidated statements of income. The Company reviews each pool for current trends, actual versus expected performance, and expected timing of future recoveries (curve shape). The Company then re-forecasts the timing and amounts of expected future recoveries.

We identified management’s judgements and assumptions used in the determination of the estimate of expected future recoveries on purchased credit deteriorated assets as a critical audit matter. Estimated future recoveries are based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Auditing such judgments and assumptions required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased auditor effort, including the extent of specialized skills and knowledge needed.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

•Testing the design and operating effectiveness of controls over management’s assessment of the reasonableness of inputs to and outputs from the Company’s proprietary statistical and behavioral models used to forecast expected future recoveries, and performance monitoring of expected future recoveries, which included the observation of certain key governance meetings.

•Testing the collection data used by management to monitor each pool for current trends, actual versus expected performance, and the expected amount and timing of future recoveries (curve shape).

•Evaluating management’s process used to develop estimates of expected future recoveries and certain qualitative factors by: (i) testing source data; and (ii) evaluating the reasonableness of assumptions by comparing to historical results, including current and past period forecasts to actual performance, recent performance trends, and curve shape.

•Utilizing personnel with specialized skill and knowledge in financial modeling to assist in assessing the appropriateness of certain assumptions, methodology used and the validity of the methods used to produce the model output of the new forecasting model.

Goodwill Impairment Assessment

As described in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s goodwill balance was approximately $507.8 million at December 31, 2024, which was allocated between three reporting units, MCM, Cabot and LAAP.

Subsequent to the annual impairment assessment, the Company identified a triggering event during the fourth quarter of 2024, indicating the fair value of the goodwill at the Cabot reporting unit may be below its carrying value due to the significant reduction in the estimated future recoveries for the Company’s investment in receivable portfolios at Cabot. As a result, the Company performed a quantitative goodwill impairment assessment for both the MCM and Cabot reporting units as of December 31, 2024. This analysis utilized a combination of the income and the market approaches. The Company also evaluated the aggregate fair value of its reporting units to its aggregate market capitalization at the testing date. Management determined that the fair value of the Cabot reporting unit was less than its carrying value and recorded an impairment charge of $100.6 million.

We identified the December 31, 2024 goodwill impairment assessment of the MCM and Cabot reporting units as a critical audit matter because of the significant assumptions and judgments management made as part of the assessment to estimate the fair value of the reporting units. The income approach required significant management assumptions, such as certain assumptions used in the cash flow forecasts, the discount rate, and the terminal value. The market approach required significant management judgment in the selection of appropriate peer group companies and valuation multiples. Auditing such judgments and assumptions required a high degree of auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of auditor effort, including the extent of specialized skill and knowledge needed.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

•Evaluating management’s process for developing fair value estimates determined using the income and market approaches including testing the relevance and reliability of underlying data, and evaluating significant management assumptions to historical results and market participant data.

•Recalculating the impairment charge to the Cabot reporting unit based on the difference between the fair value and carrying value of the goodwill.

•Testing the reconciliation of the fair value of the Company’s reporting units to the indicated market capitalization of the Company, as a whole.

•Utilizing personnel with specialized skill and knowledge in valuation to assist in: (i) assessing the appropriateness of the fair value methodology; (ii) evaluating the reasonableness of certain assumptions used including the discount rate, selection of peer group companies, valuation multiples, and the terminal value; (iii) assessing the reasonableness of the discount rate by developing independent estimates and comparing estimates to those utilized by management; and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of the market capitalization reconciliation.

/s/ BDO USA, P.C.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2001.

February 26, 2025