DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of:

Duos Technologies Group, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Duos Technologies Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2024 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Equity Method Investment

As described in Footnote 1 “Equity Method Investments” and Footnote 9 “Equity Investment – Sawgrass APR Holdings LLC”, the Company entered into an Asset Management Agreement (“AMA”) with Sawgrass Buyer LLC (“Sawgrass”). Under the AMA, the Company will manage the deployment and operations of a fleet of mobile gas turbines and balance-of-plant inventory providing management, sales and operations functions. A substantial portion of the Company staff and management would oversee operations of Sawgrass. In connection with this agreement, the company received an initial cash payment and common units in Sawgrass.

We identified the accounting for the common units received in Sawgrass as a critical audit matter. The determination of whether to consolidate Sawgrass as a variable interest entity or use cost method or equity method for the investment and the valuation of the investment is complex and requires estimates which can be subjective. Further, the units are considered received as non-monetary consideration from a customer, which accounting is complex.

2295 NW Corporate Blvd., Suite 240 • Boca Raton, FL 33431

Phone: (561) 995-8270 • Toll Free: (866) CPA-8500 • Fax: (561) 995-1920

www.salbergco.com • info@salbergco.com

Member National Association of Certified Valuation Analysts • Registered with the PCAOB

Member CP**AConnect with Affiliated Offices Worldwide•Member Center for Public Company Audit Firms

The primary procedures we performed to address these critical audit matters included (a) Reviewed the AMA agreement. (b) Audited management’s analysis and conclusion as to whether Sawgrass should be consolidated as a variable interest entity or the value of the common units received should be accounted for under the equity method or cost method and compared such analysis to authoritative and interpretive guidance, (c) Gained an understanding of management’s process to value the investment, (d) Audited the Company’s fair value valuation of the investment including the propriety of the valuation method used, the reliability and relevancy of data used and the reasonableness of significant assumptions used in the estimate, (e) Recomputed the resulting fair value to test the accuracy of the valuation estimate, (f) Tested management’s conclusion that the non-monetary consideration received represents consideration from a customer to be accounted for under ASC 606 “Revenue from contracts with customers”, and (g) Compared the financial statement presentation to authoritative or interpretive literature. We agree with management’s conclusions.

Percentage of Completion Revenue Recognition & Related Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities

As described in footnote 1, “Revenue Recognition – Technology Systems” and footnote 11, “Revenues and Contract Accounting” to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recognizes revenue over time using a cost-based input methodology in which significant judgement is required to determine estimated costs to complete projects. These estimated costs are then used to determine the progress towards contract completion and the corresponding amount of revenue to recognize. In addition, contract assets on uncompleted contracts represent cumulative revenues in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts accounted for under the percentage of completion contract method. Contract liabilities on uncompleted contracts represent billings that exceed cumulative revenues recognized on uncompleted contracts accounted for under the percentage of completion contract method.

We identified this percentage of completion revenue recognition as a critical audit matter. Auditing management’s estimates and judgments regarding forecasts of total estimated costs to complete projects is especially challenging and complex.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included (a) evaluated the reasonableness of management’s cost estimates to complete projects by gaining an understanding of the management’s process to develop the estimates, comparing them to historical information, year-to-date current information, information available on projects subsequent to year end, and other supporting information, (b) performed ratio analysis and gross margin comparisons when applicable on a sample of technology systems revenues (c) agreed cost details to supporting documents, (d) traced cash receipts from customers to bank statements, (e) recomputed the revenue earned and recognized, and (f) recomputed the contract asset or liability. We agree with management’s conclusions.

• Analysis of Liquidity and Going Concern*

As summarized in Footnote 2 “Liquidity” to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a history of net losses and net cash used in operating activities and believes such conditions will continue for a period of time into the future. These are considered adverse conditions or events that lead management to consider whether there is substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time or whether such concerns are alleviated with management’s plans.

We identified the going concern risk analysis as a critical audit matter. Auditing management’s going concern analysis including their process to develop the analysis and the projections of future cash flows, operating trends, and assessments of internal and external matters that may affect the Company’s future operations and cash flows involved a high degree of subjectivity. Additionally, auditing management’s plans to address the going concern risk involved highly subjective auditor judgment.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included (a) assessed the reasonableness of management’s process for developing their assessment of whether a going concern risk exists, (b) assessed the reasonableness of assumptions management used in their future cash flow projections, consideration of positive and negative evidence impacting management’s forecasts, and consideration of the Company’s financing arrangements in place as of the report date, (c) developed our own independent calculation of expected source and use of funds and needs of the Company over the one year period from the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements, (d) tested management’s bank reconciliations and confirmed cash balances as of December 31, 2024 with the banks and inspected the bank balances after the January and February 2025 stock subscriptions (e) identified management’s plans for dealing with the adverse conditions and events discussed above and assessed the reasonableness of the assumptions of such plans, (f) assessed whether it is probable that management’s plans, when implemented, will mitigate the adverse effects of the conditions and events discussed above, (g) concluded whether substantial doubt exists as to whether the Company can continue as a going concern for a period of one year after the consolidated financial statements are issued and (h) considered the effect of such conclusion on the consolidated financial statement disclosures and our report of an independent registered public accounting firm. We agree with management’s conclusions

/s/ Salberg & Company, P.A.

SALBERG & COMPANY, P.A.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013

Boca Raton, Florida

March 31, 2025