SHORE BANCSHARES INC

Shore Bancshares, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 –Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Shore Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to in these Notes as the “Company”), with all significant intercompany transactions eliminated. The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). For purposes of comparability, certain reclassifications have been made to amounts previously reported to conform with the current period presentation. Reclassifications had no effect on prior year net income or stockholders’ equity.

These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, and related notes thereto, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 (the “2025 Annual Report”).

Nature of Operations

The Company engages in the banking business through Shore United Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”), a national banking association with locations in Maryland, Delaware and Virginia. The Company’s primary source of revenue is derived from interest earned on commercial, residential mortgage and other loans, and fees charged in connection with lending and other banking services. The Company engages in financial service offerings through Wye Financial Partners, a division of the Bank, and offers corporate trustee services through Wye Trust, a division of the Bank.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and in the related disclosures. These estimates are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. While management makes its best judgments, actual amounts or results could differ from these estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2026, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2025‑08, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans, which expanded the use of the gross‑up method beyond purchased credit‑deteriorated (“PCD”) assets to include purchased seasoned loans (“PSLs”). Under the amended guidance, a non‑PCD loan (excluding credit cards) is considered seasoned if it is acquired in a business combination, or if it is purchased at least 90 days after origination and the acquirer was not involved in the origination of the loan. Qualifying PSLs are recorded at acquisition at their purchase price plus an allowance for expected credit losses, with no corresponding provision for credit losses recognized at acquisition, thereby eliminating the Day 1 provision for credit losses previously required for non‑PCD acquired loans. The early adoption of this guidance did not result in a material impact on the Company’s (consolidated) financial statements at the time of adoption; however, it is expected to reduce income statement volatility in future periods by eliminating Day 1 provisions for credit losses on qualifying acquired loans and improving comparability in acquisition accounting.

Note 2 –Investment Securities

The following tables provide information on the amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

(1)No available for sale (“AFS”) securities were sold during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.

(2)Other debt securities includes corporate and municipal bond obligations of state and political entities.

(1)Other debt securities includes corporate and municipal bond obligations of state and political entities.

Equity securities with aggregate fair values of $6.2 million as of both June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 are presented separately on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value adjustments recorded through earnings totaled a loss of $26 thousand and a gain of $19 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The fair value adjustments recorded through earnings totaled loss of $65 thousand and a gain of $106 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) on held to maturity (“HTM”) securities for the periods presented.

A reversal of the provision for credit losses of $5 thousand and an additional allowance of $21 thousand was recorded on HTM corporate and municipal bonds for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. A reversal of the provision for credit losses of $23 thousand and $4 thousand was recorded on HTM corporate and municipal bonds for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

The following tables provide information about gross unrealized losses and fair value by length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

There were 143 AFS debt securities with a fair value below the amortized cost basis, with unrealized losses totaling $9.1 million as of June 30, 2026. The Company concluded that a credit loss did not exist in its AFS securities portfolio as of June 30, 2026, andno impairment loss has been recognized based on the fact that (1) changes in fair value were primarily caused by fluctuations in interest rates, (2) securities with unrealized losses had generally high credit quality, (3) the Company intends to hold these investments in debt securities to maturity and it is more likely than not the Company will not be required to sell these investments before a recovery of its investment, and (4) issuers have continued to make timely payments of principal and interest. Additionally, the Company’s mortgage-backed securities are issued by either U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises. Collectively, these entities provide a guarantee, which is either explicitly or implicitly supported by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, that investors in such mortgage-backed securities will receive timely principal and interest payments.

All AFS and HTM securities were current withno securities past due or on nonaccrual as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

There were 143 AFS and 164 HTM securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2026. Because the Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be at maturity for debt securities, the Company considers the unrealized losses to be temporary. There were 122 AFS and 169 HTM securities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2025. Net unrealized losses with respect to the AFS securities totaled $8.4 million and $6.3 million as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.

The following table provides information on the amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities by contractual maturity date at June 30, 2026.

The maturity dates for debt securities are determined using contractual maturity dates. Actual maturities may differ from amounts presented because certain issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations without prepayment penalties.

The Company has securities that have been pledged as collateral for obligations to federal, state and local government agencies, and other purposes as required or permitted by law, or sold under agreements to repurchase. At June 30, 2026, the aggregate carrying value of AFS and HTM pledged securities was $87.7 million and $215.4 million, respectively. The comparable amounts for December 31, 2025 were $69.4 million and $218.6 million, respectively.

The following table sets forth the amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities that have been pledged as collateral for obligations to federal, state and local government agencies, and other purposes as required or permitted by law, or sold under agreements to repurchase at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

There were no obligations of any issuer exceeding 10% of stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2026 or December 31, 2025.

Note 3 –Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses

The measurement of expected credit losses under the current expected credit loss methodology promulgated by ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, is applicable to financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loan receivables. For further discussion on the most significant accounting policies that the Company follows, see Note 1 – “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8 of the 2025 Annual Report.

The following table provides information about the principal classes of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

Loans are stated at their principal amount outstanding, net of any purchase premiums or discounts, deferred fees, and costs. Included in loans were deferred costs, net of fees, of $3.1 million at both June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. At June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, loans included $1.34 billion and $1.49 billion, respectively, of aggregate loans that were acquired as part of the acquisitions of Severn Bancorp, Inc. (“Severn”) and The Community Financial Corporation (“TCFC”). These balances are presented net of the related aggregate discounts, which totaled $70.0 million and $78.2 million at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.

The following tables provide information on the amortized cost basis of nonaccrual loans by loan class as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

The overall quality of the Company’s loan portfolio is primarily assessed using the Company’s risk-grading scale. This review process is assisted by frequent internal reporting of loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and nonperforming and potential problem loans. Credit quality indicators are adjusted based on management’s judgment during the quarterly review process.

Consumer credit cards are monitored based on a borrower’s payment history. Credit card loans are classified as performing and are typically charged-off no later than 180 days or when, in the opinion of management, the collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. As of June 30, 2026, there weretwo credit cards that were evaluated based on economic conditions specific to the loans or borrowers, and were downgraded to substandard and nonperforming.

Loans subject to risk rating are graded on a scale of 1 to 10.

Ratings 1 through 6 – Pass – Ratings 1 through 6 have asset risks ranging from excellent-low to adequate. The specific rating assigned considers customer history of earnings, cash flows, liquidity, leverage, capitalization, consistency of debt service coverage, the nature and extent of customer relationship and other relevant specific business factors such as the stability of the industry or market area, changes to management, litigation or unexpected events that could have an impact on risks.

Rating 7 – Special Mention – These credits have potential weaknesses due to economic conditions, less than adequate earnings performance or other factors which require the lending officer to direct more than normal attention to the credit. Financing alternatives may be limited and/or command higher risk interest rates. Special mention loan relationships are reviewed at least quarterly.

Rating 8 – Substandard – Substandard assets are assets that are inadequately protected by the sound worth or paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged. Substandard loans are the first adversely classified loans on the Bank’s watchlist. These assets have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of substandard assets, does not have to exist in individual assets classified substandard. The loans may have a delinquent history or combination of weak collateral, weak guarantor or operating losses. When a loan is assigned to this category, the Company may estimate a specific reserve in the credit loss allowance analysis and/or place the loan on nonaccrual. These assets listed may include assets with histories of repossessions or some that are nonperforming bankruptcies. Substandard loan relationships are reviewed at least quarterly.

Rating 9 – Doubtful – Doubtful assets have many of the same characteristics of substandard assets, with the exception that the Company has determined that loss is not only possible but is probable. The amount of loss is not discernible due to factors such as merger, acquisition, or liquidation; a capital injection; a pledge of additional collateral; the sale of assets; or alternative refinancing plans. Credits receiving a doubtful classification are required to be on nonaccrual. Doubtful loan relationships are reviewed at least quarterly.

Rating 10 – Loss – Loss assets are uncollectible or of little value.

The following table provides information on loan risk ratings as of June 30, 2026 and gross charge-offs during the six months ended June 30, 2026.

The following table presents the amortized cost of credit card loans based on performing status and gross charge-offs during the six months ended June 30, 2026. Nonperforming loans consisted of nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing.

The following table provides information on loan risk ratings as of December 31, 2025 and gross charge-offs during the year ended December 31, 2025.

The following table presents the amortized cost of credit card loans based on performing status and gross charge-offs during the year ended December 31, 2025. Nonperforming loans consisted of nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing.

The following tables provide information on the aging of the Company’s loan portfolio as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

The following tables provide a summary of the activity in the ACL allocated by loan class for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one loan class does not preclude its availability to absorb losses from other loan classes.

(1)Excludes amounts pertaining to unfunded commitments.

The following tables present the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent loans by loan portfolio segment as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

(1)Commercial loans are primarily secured by underlying business assets of the borrower.

(2)Consumer loans are primarily secured by automobiles and boats of the borrower.

Loan Modifications to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty

Loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty may include interest rate reductions, principal or interest forgiveness, forbearance, term extensions and other combinations of actions intended to minimize economic loss and avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, no loan modifications were made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.

The following table presents details of portfolio loans that were modified during the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, by loan category.

As of June 30, 2026, of the loans with borrowers experiencing financial difficulty that were modified during the preceding 12 months, $140 thousand andzero were classified as current accrual and current nonaccrual, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, of the loans with borrowers experiencing financial difficulty that were modified during the preceding 12 months, $5.3 million and $170 thousand were classified as current accrual and current nonaccrual, respectively.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, there wereno defaults on loan modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty in the preceding 12 months.

Foreclosure Proceedings

The Company had $64 thousand and $124 thousand of consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that were in the process of foreclosure as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. The Company had $151 thousand and $95 thousand of commercial real estate loans collateralized by commercial real estate that were in the process of foreclosure as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.

Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) and Repossessed Assets

OREO and repossessed assets are adjusted for fair value upon transfer from loans to foreclosed assets, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. The Company had OREO and repossessed asset balances ofzero and $2.4 million as of June 30, 2026, respectively, and $113 thousand and $2.9 million as of December 31, 2025, respectively.

Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”)

Mortgage loans are sold with servicing retained and the MSRs are initially recorded at fair value with the income statement effect recorded in mortgage banking revenue in the consolidated statements of income. Subsequently, the MSRs are amortized to the income statement in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying loans. Servicing rights are evaluated for impairment based upon fair value of the rights as compared to carrying amount. No impairments of MSRs were recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The Company recognized net servicing income of $122 thousand and $168 thousand during the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and net servicing income of $261 thousand and $103 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. At June 30, 2026, the Company was servicing $324.2 million in loans for the Federal National Mortgage Association and $98.7 million in loans for Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.

The following table presents activity in MSRs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.

The fair value of MSRs was determined using discount rates ranging from 9.0% to 9.0% at June 30, 2026 and 9.0% to 10.0% at December 31, 2025. The valuation on MSRs was not material at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

Depending on the stratification of the specific mortgage servicing right, prepayment speeds ranged from 5.72% to 8.00% and 5.84% to 8.48% for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 5.72% to 8.60% and 5.69% to 8.22% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

The associated weighted-average default rates were 0.21% and 0.14% for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 0.21% and 0.14% for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

Note 4 –Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following tables provide information on the significant components of goodwill and other acquired intangible assets as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

The aggregate amortization expense for the core deposit intangible was $2.0 million and $2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and was $4.0 million and $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

As of June 30, 2026, the estimated future remaining amortization for core deposit intangibles within the years ending December 31 is as follows:

Note 5 –Leases

Right-of-use assets represent the Company’s right to use the underlying asset for the lease term and are calculated as the sum of the lease liability and if applicable, prepaid rent, initial direct costs and any incentives received from the lessor. Lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments and are presented at each reporting date as the net present value of the remaining contractual cash flows. Cash flows are discounted at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate in effect at the commencement date of the lease.

The Company’s long-term lease agreements for branches and offices are classified as operating leases. Certain of these leases offer the option to extend the lease term and the Company has included such extensions in its calculation of the lease liabilities to the extent the options are reasonably certain of being exercised. The lease agreements do not provide for residual value guarantees and have no restrictions or covenants that would impact dividends or require incurring additional financial obligations.

The following tables present information about the Company’s leases as of and for the periods presented.

The following table presents a maturity analysis of operating lease liabilities and a reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to total operating lease liabilities at June 30, 2026.

Total gross rental income was $275 thousand and $280 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $581 thousand and $615 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

Note 6– Deposits

Deposits consist of the following categories as of the dates indicated:

The following table provides information on the approximate maturities of total time deposits at June 30, 2026.

The approximate amount of certificates of deposit that exceeded the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000 or more was $398.4 million and $403.5 million at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.

Note 7– Borrowings

The following table summarizes certain information of the Company’s long-term debt as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

At June 30, 2026, subordinated debentures consisted of $60.0 million of long-term debt issued by the Company in November 2025. As of June 30, 2026, the recorded balance of subordinated debt issued by the Company, net of unamortized issuance costs, was $58.8 million. The Company has the option to redeem the subordinated notes in part or whole as of November 15, 2030. As of June 30, 2026,100%of the subordinated debt was considered Tier 2 capital under current regulatory guidelines.

The Company assumed trust preferred securities in the aggregate of $33.0 million as a result of the merger with TCFC in 2023 and the acquisition of Severn in 2021. Trust preferred securities consisted of $20.6 million issued by Severn Capital Trust I, $7.2 million issued by Tri-County Capital Trust I and $5.2 million issued by Tri-County Capital Trust II. The recorded balance of the junior subordinated debt securities of Severn Capital Trust I at June 30, 2026 was $19.1 million, net of the unamortized fair value adjustment of $1.6 million. At June 30, 2026, the junior subordinated debt securities of Tri-County Capital Trust I and Tri-County Capital Trust II had a recorded balance of $6.7 million and $4.5 million, respectively, which are presented net of the unamortized fair value adjustments of $474 thousand and $626 thousand, respectively. As of June 30, 2026, the entire amount of trust preferred securities debt is considered Tier 2 capital under current regulatory guidelines.

The Company may periodically borrow from a correspondent federal funds line of credit arrangement, under a secured reverse repurchase agreement, or from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) to meet short-term liquidity needs. The Company hadno outstanding borrowings from the FHLB at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. The Company didnot have any borrowings against correspondent federal fund lines at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. Further information on these obligations is provided in the Company’s 2025 Annual Report.

Note 8 –Derivatives

The Company maintains and accounts for derivatives, in the form of interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”) and mandatory forward contracts, in accordance with the FASB guidance on accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. The Company recognizes gains and losses through mortgage banking revenue in the consolidated statements of income.

IRLCs on mortgage loans that the Company intends to sell in the secondary market are considered derivatives. The Company is exposed to price risk from the time a mortgage loan is locked in until the time the loan is sold. The period of time between issuance of a loan commitment, closing and sale of the loan generally ranges from 14 days to 120 days, however, this period may be longer for construction to permanent loans that are originated with the intent of selling in the secondary market upon permanent financing. For these IRLCs and closed inventory in loans held for sale, the Company attempts to protect itself from changes in interest rates through the use of to be announced (“TBA”) securities, which are forward contracts, as well as, to a significantly lesser degree, loan level commitments in the form of best efforts and mandatory forward contracts. These assets and liabilities are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other assets and accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively.

The following table provides information pertaining to the carrying amounts of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

With respect to interest rate products, the Company recognized gains of $373 thousand and $654 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and gains of $135 thousand and $938 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

Note 9 –Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The Company records unrealized holding gains (losses), net of tax, on AFS securities as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The following table provides information on the changes in the component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.

Note 10 –Regulatory Capital Requirements

Banks and bank holding companies are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory– and possibly additional discretionary– actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action (“PCA”), the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and Bank to maintain amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”), Tier 1 and total capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (leverage ratio). As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, management believes that the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.

As of June 30, 2026, the most recent notification from the Bank’s primary regulator categorized the Bank, as “well-capitalized” under the regulatory framework for PCA. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes would change the Bank’s classification. To be categorized as “well-capitalized,” the Bank must maintain minimum CET1, Tier 1 risk-based and total risk-based capital ratios, and Tier 1 leverage ratios, which are outlined in the table below.

The following tables present the capital amounts and ratios for the Company and the Bank as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

(1)Applies to the Bank only.

(2)Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets (Leverage) has no capital conservation buffer defined. The PCA well-capitalized threshold is defined as 5.00%.

(1)Applies to the Bank only.

(2)Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets (Leverage) has no capital conservation buffer defined. The PCA well-capitalized threshold is defined as 5.00%.

As of June 30, 2026, both the Company and the Bank satisfied the capital conservation buffer requirements applicable to them. The lowest capital buffer ratio at the Company was the Tier 1 Capital to RWA, which was 5.71% above the minimum capital ratio requirement, and the lowest capital buffer ratio at the Bank was the Total Capital to RWA, which was 5.56% above the minimum capital ratio requirement.

The Company is a separate legal entity from the Bank and must provide for its own liquidity. In addition to its operating expenses, the Company is responsible for paying any dividends declared to its common stockholders and interest and principal on outstanding debt. The Company’s primary source of income is dividends received from the Bank. The amount of dividends that the Bank may declare and pay to the Company in any calendar year, without the receipt of prior approval from the OCC, cannot exceed net income for that year to date plus retained net income (as defined) for the preceding two calendar years. As of June 30, 2026, the Bank could pay dividends to the Company to the extent of its current period earnings plus the earnings of the preceding two years, so long as it maintained required capital ratios.

Note 11 –Fair Value Measurements

Accounting guidance under GAAP defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This accounting guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities on a recurring basis and to determine fair value disclosures. Available for sale securities and equity securities with readily determinable fair values are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, along with other mortgage-related items identified in the recurring fair value table below. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as collateral-dependent loans, repossessed assets and OREO (foreclosed assets). These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Under fair value accounting guidance, assets and liabilities are grouped at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine their fair values. These hierarchy levels are:

•Level 1 inputs – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

•Level 2 inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

•Level 3 inputs – Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Available for Sale Securities

Fair value measurement of AFS securities is based on quoted prices from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include present value of future cash flows, prepayment assumptions, credit loss assumptions and other factors. The Company classifies its investments in U.S. Treasury securities, if any, as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy, and it classifies its investments in U.S. government agency securities and mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities as Level 2.

Equity Securities

Fair value measurement for equity securities is based on quoted market prices retrieved by the Company via online resources. Although these securities have readily available fair market values, the Company determined that they should be classified as Level 2 investments in the fair value hierarchy due to not being considered traded in a highly active market.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale are carried at fair value, which is determined based on mark to trade for allocated/committed loans or mark to market analysis for unallocated/uncommitted loans based on third-party pricing models (Level 2).

IRLCs

The Company utilizes a third-party specialist model to estimate the fair value of IRLCs, which are valued based upon mortgage securities (TBA) prices less estimated costs to process and settle the loan. Fair value is adjusted for the estimated probability of the loan closing with the borrower (Level 3).

The following table presents activity in the IRLCs – net asset for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.

Forward Contracts

To manage interest rate risk, the Company hedges the open locked/closed position with TBA forward trades. On a regular basis, the Company allocates disbursed loans to mandatory commitments with government-sponsored enterprises and private investors delivering the loans within 120 days of origination to maximize interest earnings. For a small percentage of businesses, the Company enters into best efforts forward sales commitments with investors at the time it makes an IRLC to a borrower. Once a loan has been closed and funded, the best efforts commitments convert to mandatory forward sales commitments. The mandatory commitments are derivatives, and the Company measures and reports them at fair value. Fair value is based on the gain or loss that would occur if the Company were to pair-off the transaction with the investor at the measurement date. This is a Level 2 input. The Company has elected to measure and report best efforts commitments at fair value using a valuation methodology similar to that used for mandatory commitments.

Market assumptions utilized in the fair value measurement of the reporting entity’s residential mortgage derivatives, inclusive of IRLCs, closed loan inventory, TBA derivative trades, and mandatory forward contracts may be subject to investor overlays that may result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. Generally such overlays are announced with advanced notice in order to include the risk adjuster, however there are times when announcements are mandated resulting in a lower fair value measurement. Additionally market assumptions such as spec pool payups may result in a significantly higher fair value measurement at time of loan allocation to specific trades.

The following tables present the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. No assets or liabilities were transferred from one hierarchy level to another during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Individually Evaluated Collateral-Dependent Loans

Loans for which repayment is substantially expected to be provided through the operation or sale of collateral are considered collateral dependent and are valued based on the estimated fair value of the collateral, less estimated costs to sell at the reporting date, where applicable. Management utilizes various methods to estimate fair value of the collateral including appraisals, discounted cashflow and automated valuation methods. Accordingly, collateral-dependent loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

OREO (Foreclosed Assets)

Foreclosed assets are adjusted for fair value upon transfer of loans to foreclosed assets establishing a new cost basis. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. The estimated fair value for foreclosed assets included in Level 3 is determined by independent market-based appraisals and other available market information, less costs to sell, that may be reduced further based on market expectations or an executed sales agreement. If the fair value of the collateral deteriorates subsequent to the initial recognition, the Company records the foreclosed asset as a nonrecurring Level 3 adjustment. Valuation techniques are consistent with those techniques applied in prior periods.

Repossessed Assets

All repossessed assets are recorded at the lower of the estimated fair value of the assets, less expected selling costs, or the carrying amount of the defaulted loans. From time to time, nonrecurring fair value adjustments are recorded to reflect partial write-downs based on the current appraised value of an asset. The Company considers any valuation inputs related to repossessed assets to be Level 3 inputs. Fair value adjustments for these assets are recorded in other noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Other Assets Held for Sale

Other assets held for sale are carried at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value. The fair value is determined based on the appraisal value, listing price of the property or collateral provided by independent appraisers, and is adjusted for the estimated costs to sell. Due to the use of significant unobservable inputs, these assets are classified as Level 3 under the fair value hierarchy. Fair value adjustments for these assets are recorded in other noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of income.

The following tables set forth the Company’s assets subject to fair value adjustments (impairment) on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 that are valued at the lower of cost or market. The Company had no other assets subject to Level 3 fair value measurements as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. Assets are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

(1)Unobservable inputs were weighted by the relative fair value of the instruments. No range is presented only when one instrument was available.

(2)Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percent of the appraisal.

Note 12 –Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial instruments require disclosure of fair value information, whether or not recognized in the consolidated balance sheets, when it is practical to estimate the fair value. A financial instrument is defined as cash, evidence of an ownership interest in an entity or a contractual obligation which requires the exchange of cash. Certain items are specifically excluded from the financial instrument fair value disclosure requirements, including the Company’s common stock, OREO, repossessed assets, premises and equipment and other assets and liabilities.

The following tables present the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. Fair values for June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 were estimated using an exit price notion.

Note 13 –Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of business, to meet the financial needs of its customers, the Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Letters of credit and other commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Because many of the letters of credit and commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Commitments to make loans are generally made for a period of 90 days or less.

The following table provides information on commitments outstanding as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

The Company had a reserve for off-balance sheet credit exposures of $2.2 million and $2.0 million as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. The reserve was estimated based on current expected credit losses to be experienced by the Company. Losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the required funding of these exposures is uncollectible. While this evaluation is completed on a regular basis, it is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

In the normal course of business, the Company may become involved in litigation arising from banking, financial and other activities. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the future liability, if any, arising out of current proceedings will have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, operating results or liquidity.

Note 14 –Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents (stock-based awards). The following table provides information relating to the calculation of earnings per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.

There were zero and 3,323 anti-dilutive unvested restricted stock and performance stock unit awards excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. There were 1,098 and 3,363 anti-dilutive unvested restricted stock and performance stock unit awards excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

Share Repurchase Program

In May 2026, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $30 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock over the next 12 months (the “Repurchase Program”). Under the Repurchase Program, the shares may be repurchased from time to time through a combination of open market transactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, through block trades and pursuant to any trading plan that may be adopted in accordance with Rules 10b5-1 and/or 10b-18 of the Exchange Act. The actual timing, number and value of shares repurchased under the Repurchase Program will be determined by management at its discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including the market price of the Company’s stock, general market and economic conditions, applicable legal requirements, and other factors. The Repurchase Program may be modified, amended or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time.

The following table presents information regarding the Company’s Repurchase Program for each of the periods presented.

All share repurchases were made in open market transactions. As of June 30, 2026, the Company was authorized to repurchase a remaining $29.1 million of outstanding shares of common stock under the Repurchase Program.

Note 15 –Revenue Recognition

Topic 606 is applicable to noninterest revenue streams such as trust and asset management income, deposit related fees, interchange fees and merchant income. Noninterest revenue streams in-scope of Topic 606 are discussed below. Topic 606 does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including revenue from loans and securities.

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts

Service charges on deposit accounts consist of account analysis fees (i.e., net fees earned on analyzed business and public checking accounts), monthly service fees, check orders, and other deposit account related fees. The Company’s performance obligation for account analysis fees and monthly service fees is generally satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, over the period in which the service is provided.

Check orders and other deposit account-related fees are largely transactional based, and therefore, the Company’s performance obligation is satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a point in time. Payment for service charges on deposit accounts is primarily received immediately or at the end of the month through a direct charge to customers’ accounts.

Trust and Investment Fee Income

Trust and investment fee income is primarily comprised of fees earned from the management and administration of trusts and other customer assets. The Company’s performance obligation is generally satisfied over time, and the resulting fees are recognized monthly, based upon the month-end market value of the assets under management and the applicable fee rate. Payment is generally received a few days after month end through a direct charge to customers’ accounts. The Company does not earn performance-based incentives.

Optional services such as real estate sales and tax return preparation services are also available to existing trust and asset management customers. The Company’s performance obligation for these transactional-based services is generally satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a point in time (i.e., as incurred). Payment is received shortly after services are rendered.

Interchange Income

Interchange fees are primarily fees earned on payment card transactions processed through card networks such as Visa, Mastercard, and other debit and credit card networks. These fees are generally calculated as a percentage of the transaction value, plus a fixed fee per transaction, and are primarily paid by acquiring banks to issuing banks. Merchant services income mainly represents fees charged to merchants to process their debit and credit card transactions, in addition to account management fees.

Other Noninterest Income

Other noninterest income consists of fees, other service charges, safety deposit box rental fees, and other miscellaneous revenue streams. Fees and other service charges are primarily comprised of debit income, automated teller machine (“ATM”) fees, merchant services income, and other service charges. ATM fees are primarily generated when a Company cardholder uses a third-party ATM or a non-Company cardholder uses a Company ATM. Other service charges include revenue from processing wire transfers, bill pay service, cashier’s checks, and other services.

The Company’s performance obligation for fees, exchange, and other service charges are largely satisfied, and related revenue recognized, when the services are rendered or upon completion. Payment is typically received immediately or in the following month. Safe deposit box rental fees are charged to the customer on an annual basis and recognized upon receipt of payment.

The following presents noninterest income, segregated by revenue streams in-scope and out-of-scope of Topic 606, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.