Skip to main content

SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORP

For the period ended Dec 31, 2023. Filed Feb 28, 2024.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2023 · Filed Feb 28, 2024

SBAC$191.43+0.6%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of SBA Communications Corporation

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SBA Communications Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders' deficit and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 28, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

‎

Accounting for Ground Leases
Description of the MatterAs more fully described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recognizes a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for its operating lease contracts, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments over the lease term. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had $2.2 billion of operating lease right-of-use assets, net, $271.8 million of current operating lease liabilities, and $1.9 billion of long-term lease liabilities. For the period ended December 31, 2023, the total operating lease right-of-use assets obtained for new operating lease liabilities were $55.3 million and adjustments associated with lease modifications and reassessments were a reduction of $86.7 million. The Company’s primary operating lease obligations are its long-term lease contracts for land that underlies its tower structures. The Company’s ground leases generally do not provide a readily determinable implicit discount rate. When the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable, the Company calculates the present value of the lease payments by estimating the Company’s incremental borrowing rate (“IBR”). The IBR is the rate of interest that the Company would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term in a similar economic environment. The IBR is computed on a lease-by-lease basis when the Company enters into a new lease, upon a lease modification, or upon a lease reassessment event. Auditing the Company’s accounting for ground leases was complex because of the significant uncertainty associated with inputs into the IBR. The process to estimate the Company’s IBR includes the use of subjective inputs, considers the public credit rating of the Company, observable debt yields of the Company and the related debt’s seniority, and adjustments for leases denominated in different currencies, to determine the IBR over the remaining lease term.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our AuditWe obtained an understanding, evaluated and tested the design and operating effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls related to determining the IBR used in accounting for ground leases. For example, we tested the Company’s controls over the review of the accounting policy, including the methodology and assumptions used to estimate the IBR. To test the Company’s accounting for ground leases, our audit procedures included, among others, evaluating the methodology used to calculate the IBR, and evaluating the assumptions and underlying data used by the Company to estimate the IBR. We involved our valuation specialists to assist in the evaluation of the methodologies and assumptions applied to estimate the IBR. We compared the Company’s credit rating used in the IBR estimate to independent third-party sources and compared the Company’s existing borrowing rate for collateralized assets to observable debt yields of the Company. We also evaluated the Company’s disclosures included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.

Boca Raton, Florida

February 28, 2024

‎

CONSOLIDATED

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.