OFG BANCORP

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

OFG Bancorp:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of OFG Bancorp, and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 25, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Allowance for Credit Losses related to loans collectively evaluated for impairment

As discussed in Notes 1 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s allowance for credit losses (ACL) for loans was $202 million as of December 31, 2025, which includes loans evaluated on a collective basis when they share similar risk characteristics (the December 31, 2025 collective ACL). The Company uses a discounted cash flow (DCF) method to measure credit losses on most of the Non-Purchased Credit Deteriorated (Non- PCD) portfolios and undiscounted cash flow (UDCF) method for Purchased Credit Deteriorated (PCD) portfolios. The Company estimated the collective ACL using probability of default (PD), loss given default (LGD), and exposure at default (EAD). The PD and LGD incorporate consideration of economic forecast scenarios and macroeconomic assumptions based on relevant information about historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the loan balances. After the reasonable and supportable forecast period, the Company reverts on a straight-line basis to the historical information for the remainder of the contractual term adjusted for prepayments. The Company estimates the EAD using prepayment models which projects prepayments over the life of the loans. Qualitative adjustments are made to the collective ACL to consider factors for asset-specific risk characteristics to the extent they do not exist in the historical information that has not been accounted for and are expected to impact the amount of future losses.

We identified the assessment of the December 31, 2025, collective ACL as a critical audit matter. A high degree of audit effort, including specialized skills and knowledge, and subjective and complex auditor judgment was involved in the assessment due to significant measurement uncertainty. Specifically, the assessment of the collective ACL methodology encompassed the evaluation of the methods and models used to estimate the PD, LGD, EAD, and their significant assumptions, including the selection of macroeconomic forecast scenarios and the weighting of the scenarios, the reasonable and supportable forecast periods. The assessment also included an evaluation of the conceptual soundness and performance of the PD, LGD, and EAD. In addition, auditor judgment was required to evaluate the sufficiency of audit evidence obtained.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the Company’s measurement of the December 31, 2025, collective ACL estimates, including controls over the:

•development of the December 31, 2025, the collective ACL methodology, including of the DCF and UDCF methods

•continued use and appropriateness of PD, LGD, and EAD models

•performance monitoring of the PD, LGD, and EAD models

•identification and determination of the significant assumptions used in the PD, LGD, and EAD models

•analysis of the December 31, 2025, collective ACL results, trends, and ratios.

We evaluated the Company’s process to develop the December 31, 2025, collective ACL estimates by testing the selection of the method, certain sources of relevant data, assumptions that the Company used, and considered the relevance and reliability of such data and assumptions. We also evaluated the reasonable and supportable forecast periods by comparing it to specific portfolio risk characteristics and trends. In addition, we involved credit risk professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

•evaluating the December 31, 2025, collective ACL methodology of the Company for compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

•evaluating judgments made by the Company relative to the assessment and performance testing of the PD, LGD, and EAD models by comparing them to relevant Company-specific metrics and trends and the applicable industry and regulatory practices

•assessing the conceptual soundness and performance testing of the PD, LGD, and EAD models by inspecting the model documentation to determine whether the models are suitable for their intended use

•evaluating the selection of macroeconomic forecast scenarios and weighting of the scenarios by comparing it to the Company’s business environment and relevant industry practices

We also assessed the sufficiency of the audit evidence obtained related to the December 31, 2025, collective ACL estimates by evaluating the:

•cumulative result of the audit procedures

•qualitative aspects of the Company’s accounting practices

•potential bias in the accounting estimates.

/s/KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2005.

San Juan, Puerto Rico

February 25, 2026

Stamp No. DLLP21-403 of the Puerto Rico

Society of Certified Public Accountants

was affixed to the records copy of this report.