UNITED NATURAL FOODS INC

NOTE 1—SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business

United Natural Foods, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “UNFI”, or “our”) is a leading distributor of natural, organic, specialty, produce and conventional grocery and non-food products, and provider of support services to retailers. The Company sells its products primarily throughout the United States and Canada.

Effective for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, the Company updated its segment reporting structure to align with how the business is now operated and managed, following the divisional realignment and organizational changes that began during the second quarter of fiscal 2025. Prior periods have been recast to conform to the Company’s new reportable segments, which are as follows:

•Natural, which primarily reflects the wholesale distribution of natural, organic and specialty grocery and non-food products and services and includes the Company’s portfolio of natural owned brands and natural and organic snack food manufacturing business;

•Conventional, which primarily reflects the wholesale distribution of conventional grocery and non-food products and services and includes the Company’s portfolio of conventional owned brands; and

•Retail, which reflects the Company’s grocery and liquor stores operating under the Cub® Foods and Shoppers® banners that sell products directly to consumers.

Refer to Note 16—Business Segments for additional information.

Cybersecurity Incident

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, the Company became aware of unauthorized activity on certain information technology systems. The Company promptly activated its incident response plan and implemented containment measures, including proactively taking certain systems offline (the “Cybersecurity Incident”).

During fiscal 2025, the Company recognized expenses related to the Cybersecurity Incident in Gross profit and Operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company maintains insurance coverage to limit its exposure to losses such as those related to the Cybersecurity Incident. The Company has submitted, and intends to continue to submit, claims to its insurers for reimbursement of some of the costs, expenses, and losses stemming from the Cybersecurity Incident and expects that the full claim and settlement process will extend throughout fiscal 2026. The timing of recognizing insurance recoveries will differ from the timing of recognizing the associated expenses.

Fiscal Year

The Company’s fiscal years end on the Saturday closest to July 31 and contain either 52 or 53 weeks. References to fiscal 2025, fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023, or 2025, 2024 and 2023, as presented in tabular disclosure, relate to the 52-week, 53-week and 52-week fiscal periods ended August 2, 2025, August 3, 2024 and July 29, 2023, respectively. Fiscal 2024 contained 53 weeks with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024 containing 14 weeks.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Within the Consolidated Financial Statements certain immaterial amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on reported net (loss) income, cash flows, or total assets and liabilities.

Our Net sales consist primarily of product sales of natural, organic, specialty, produce, and conventional grocery and non-food products, adjusted for customer volume discounts, vendor incentives when applicable, returns and allowances, and professional services revenue. Net sales also include amounts charged by the Company to customers for shipping and handling and fuel surcharges. Vendor incentives do not reduce sales in circumstances where the vendor tenders the incentive to the customer, when the incentive is not a direct reimbursement from a vendor, when the incentive is not influenced by or negotiated in conjunction with any other incentive arrangements and when the incentive is not subject to an agency relationship with the vendor, whether expressed or implied.

The Company recognizes revenue in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for goods or services when its performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control of those promised goods or services to its customers. Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606 defines a five-step process to recognize revenue that requires judgment and estimates, including identifying the contract with the customer, identifying the performance obligations in the contract, determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and recognizing revenue when or as the performance obligation is satisfied.

Revenues from wholesale product sales are recognized when control is transferred, which typically happens upon delivery, depending on the contract terms with the customer. Typically, shipping and customer receipt of wholesale products occur on the same business day. Discounts and allowances provided to customers are recognized as a reduction in Net sales as control of the products is transferred to customers. The Company recognizes freight revenue related to transportation of its products when control of the product is transferred, which is typically upon delivery.

Revenues from Retail product sales are recognized at the point of sale upon customer check-out. Advertising income earned from our franchisees that participate in our Retail advertising program is recognized as Net sales. The Company recognizes loyalty program expense in the form of fuel rewards as a reduction of Net sales.

Sales tax is excluded from Net sales. Limited rights of return exist with our customers due to the nature of the products we sell.

Refer to Note 3—Revenue Recognition for additional information regarding the Company’s revenue recognition policies.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales consist primarily of amounts paid to suppliers for product sold, plus transportation costs necessary to bring the product to, or move product between, the Company’s distribution centers and retail stores, partially offset by consideration received from suppliers in connection with the purchase, transportation or promotion of the suppliers’ products. Retail store advertising expenses are components of Cost of sales and are expensed as incurred.

The Company receives allowances and credits from vendors for buying activities, such as volume incentives, promotional allowances directed by the Company to customers, cash discounts and new product introductions (collectively referred to as “vendor funds”), which are typically based on contractual arrangements covering a period of one year or less. The Company recognizes vendor funds for merchandising activities as a reduction of Cost of sales when the related products are sold, unless it has been determined that a discrete identifiable benefit has been provided to the vendor, in which case the related amounts are recognized within Net sales. Vendor funds that have been earned as a result of completing the required performance under the terms of the underlying agreements but for which the product has not yet been sold are recognized as a reduction to the cost of inventory. When payments or rebates can be reasonably estimated and it is probable that the specified target will be met, the payment or rebate is accrued. However, when attaining the target is not probable, the payment or rebate is recognized only when and if the target is achieved. Any upfront payments received for multi-period contracts are generally deferred and amortized over the life of the contracts. The majority of the vendor funds contracts have terms of less than a year, with a small proportion of the contracts longer than one year.

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs

The Company includes shipping and handling fees billed to customers in Net sales. Shipping and handling costs associated with inbound freight are recorded in Cost of sales, whereas shipping and handling costs for receiving, selecting, quality assurance, and outbound transportation are recorded in Operating expenses. Outbound shipping and handling costs, including allocated employee benefit expenses that are recorded in Operating expenses, totaled $1,686 million, $1,674 million and $1,745 million for fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Operating expenses include distribution expenses of warehousing, delivery, purchasing, receiving, selecting, and outbound transportation expenses, and selling and administrative expenses. These expenses include salaries and wages, employee benefits, occupancy, insurance, depreciation and amortization expense and share-based compensation expense.

Restructuring, acquisition and integration related expenses reflect expenses resulting from restructuring activities, including severance costs, facility closure costs, contract exit-related costs, share-based compensation acceleration charges and acquisition and integration related expenses. Integration related expenses include certain professional consulting expenses and incremental expenses related to combining facilities required to optimize our distribution network as a result of acquisitions.

Loss on sale of assets and other asset charges primarily includes losses (gains) on sales of assets, losses on sales of financial assets, and asset impairments. In fiscal 2025, the Company recorded an impairment charge related to its Allentown, Pennsylvania distribution center. Refer to Note 5—Property and Equipment, Net and Note 11—Leases for additional information on this impairment charge. In fiscal 2024, the Company recorded impairment charges related to one of its corporate-owned office locations, certain leased and owned distribution centers and certain retail store locations. Refer to Note 5—Property and Equipment, Net for additional information on these impairment charges. In fiscal 2023, the Company recorded an impairment charge related to intangible assets associated with its Blue Marble Brands portfolio. Refer to Note 6—Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net for additional information on this impairment charge.

Interest expense, net includes primarily interest expense on long-term debt, net of capitalized interest, loss on debt extinguishment, interest expense on finance lease obligations, amortization of financing costs and discounts, and interest income.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The Company’s banking arrangements allow it to fund outstanding checks when presented to the financial institution for payment. The Company funds all intraday bank balance overdrafts during the same business day. Checks outstanding in excess of bank balances create book overdrafts, which are recorded in Accounts payable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reflected as an operating activity in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024, the Company had net book overdrafts of $267 million and $243 million, respectively.

Accounts Receivable, Net

Accounts receivable, net primarily consist of trade receivables from customers and net receivable balances from suppliers. In determining the adequacy of the allowances, management analyzes customer creditworthiness, aging of receivables, payment terms, the value of the collateral, customer financial statements, historical collection experience and other economic and industry factors. In instances where a reserve has been recorded for a particular customer, future sales to the customer are conducted using either cash-on-delivery terms, or the account is closely monitored so that as agreed upon payments are received and then orders are released; a failure to pay results in held or canceled orders.

Inventories, Net

Substantially all of the Company’s inventories consist of finished goods. To value discrete inventory items at lower of cost or net realizable value before application of any last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) reserve, the Company utilizes the weighted average cost method, perpetual cost method, the retail inventory method and the replacement cost method. Allowances for vendor funds and cash discounts received from suppliers are recorded as a reduction to Inventories, net and subsequently within Cost of sales upon the sale of the related products. Inventory quantities are evaluated throughout each fiscal year based on physical counts in the Company’s distribution centers and stores. Allowances for inventory shortages are recorded based on the results of these counts. During fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024, inventory quantities in certain LIFO layers were reduced. These reductions resulted in a liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs prevailing in prior years as compared with the cost of fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024 purchases, the effect of which decreased Cost of sales by approximately $28 million in fiscal 2025 and $15 million in fiscal 2024. As of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024, approximately $1.8 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively, of inventory was valued under the LIFO method, before the application of a LIFO reserve, and primarily included grocery, frozen food and general merchandise products, with the remaining inventory valued under the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method and primarily included meat, dairy and deli products. The LIFO reserve was $349 million and $351 million as of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024, respectively, which is recorded within Inventories, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Property and Equipment, Net and Amortizing Intangible Assets

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation expense is based on the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. Applicable interest charges incurred during the construction of new facilities are capitalized as one of the elements of cost and are amortized over the assets’ estimated useful lives if certain criteria are met. Refer to Note 5—Property and Equipment, Net for additional information.

The Company reviews long-lived assets, including amortizing intangible assets, for indicators of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Cash flows expected to be generated by the related assets are estimated over the assets’ useful lives based on updated projections. The Company groups long-lived assets with other assets at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets. If the evaluation indicates that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable, the potential impairment is measured based on a fair value discounted cash flow model or a market approach method. Refer to Note 5—Property and Equipment, Net and Note 6—Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net for additional information regarding the Company’s long-lived asset impairment reviews and other information.

Cloud Computing Arrangements

The Company enters into certain cloud-based software hosting arrangements for internal use that are accounted for as service contracts. The capitalized implementation costs associated with these cloud computing arrangements are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other long-term assets within the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the related cash flows are included within operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Once a cloud computing arrangement is ready for its intended use, the capitalized implementation costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related hosting agreement, including renewal periods that are reasonably certain to be exercised, and expensed in the same line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as the associated hosting fees. The net book value of these capitalized implementation costs was $52 million and $51 million as of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024, respectively. Amortization expense was $8 million, $4 million and $2 million for fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. A deferred tax asset is recognized if it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will be realized. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not expected to be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company records liabilities to address uncertain tax positions we have taken in previously filed tax returns or that we expect to take in a future tax return. The determination for required liabilities is based upon an analysis of each individual tax position, taking into consideration whether it is more likely than not that our tax position, based on technical merits, will be sustained upon examination. For those positions for which we conclude it is more likely than not it will be sustained, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. The difference between the amount recognized and the total tax position is recorded as a liability. The ultimate resolution of these tax positions may be greater or less than the liabilities recorded.

The Company allocates tax expense among specific financial statement components using a “with-or-without” approach. Under this approach, the Company first determines the total tax expense or benefit (current and deferred) for the period. The Company then calculates the tax effect of pretax income. The residual tax expense is allocated on a proportional basis to other financial statement components (i.e. other comprehensive income).

Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net

The Company accounts for acquired businesses using the purchase method of accounting, which requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at the acquisition date at their respective estimated fair values. Goodwill represents the excess acquisition cost over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination that generated the goodwill. Goodwill reporting units exist at one level below the operating segment level unless they are determined to be economically similar, and are evaluated for events or changes in circumstances indicating a goodwill reporting unit has changed. Relative fair value allocations are performed when components of an aggregated goodwill reporting unit become separate reporting units or move from one reporting unit to another.

Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter and more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that would indicate that the value of the reporting unit may be impaired. The Company performs qualitative assessments of Goodwill for impairment. If the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than the carrying value, or the Company bypasses the qualitative assessment, a quantitative assessment would be performed. When a quantitative assessment is required, the Company estimates the fair values of its reporting units by using the market approach, applying a multiple of earnings based on guidelines for publicly traded companies, and/or the income approach, discounting projected future cash flows based on management’s expectations of the current and future operating environment for each reporting unit. Refer to Note 6—Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net for additional information regarding the Company’s goodwill impairment reviews and other information.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets include the Tony’s Fine Foods tradename, and prior to July 23, 2023 included the Blue Marble Brands portfolio. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment at least annually as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter and more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that would indicate that the value of the asset may be impaired. When a quantitative assessment is required, the Company estimates the fair value for intangible assets utilizing the income approach, which discounts the projected future net cash flow using an appropriate discount rate that reflects the risks associated with such projected future cash flow. Refer to Note 6—Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net for additional information regarding the Company’s intangible assets impairment reviews and other information.

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the following years:

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis, and non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized on a non-recurring basis, are recognized or disclosed at fair value on at least an annual basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

•Level 1 Inputs—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

•Level 2 Inputs—Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable through correlation with market data. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and inputs to valuation models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment because the inputs used in the model, such as interest rates and volatility, can be corroborated by readily observable market data.

•Level 3 Inputs—One or more significant inputs that are unobservable and supported by little or no market activity, and that reflect the use of significant management judgment. Level 3 assets and liabilities include those whose fair value measurements are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar valuation techniques, and significant management judgment or estimation.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments including Cash and cash equivalents, Accounts receivable, Accounts payable and certain Accrued expenses and Other assets and liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation consists of time-based restricted stock units, performance-based restricted stock units and stock options. Share-based compensation expense is measured by the fair value of the award on the date of grant. The Company recognizes Share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the individual grants. Forfeitures are recognized as reductions to Share-based compensation when they occur. The grant date closing price per share of the Company’s stock is used to determine the fair value of restricted stock units. The Company classifies certain restricted stock unit awards that can or will be settled in cash as liability awards. The fair value of liability-classified awards is remeasured at the end of each reporting period and adjustments resulting from remeasurement are recognized in earnings over the requisite service period. The Company’s executive officers and members of senior management have been granted performance units which vest, when and if earned, in accordance with the terms of the related performance unit award agreements. The Company recognizes Share-based compensation expense based on the target number of shares of common stock and the Company’s stock price on the date of grant and subsequently adjusts expense based on actual and forecasted performance compared to planned targets. Share-based compensation expense is recognized within Operating expenses for ongoing employees and in certain instances is recorded within Restructuring, acquisition and integration related expenses when an employee is notified of termination and their awards become accelerated. Refer to Note 12—Share-Based Awards for additional information.

Benefit Plans

The Company recognizes the funded status of its Company-sponsored defined benefit plans in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and gains or losses and prior service costs or credits not yet recognized as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company measures its defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan obligations as of the nearest calendar month end. The Company records Net periodic benefit income or expense related to interest cost, expected return on plan assets and the amortization of actuarial gains and losses, excluding service costs, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations within Net periodic benefit income, excluding service cost. Service costs are recorded in Operating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company sponsors pension and other postretirement plans in various forms covering participants who meet eligibility requirements. The determination of the Company’s obligation and related income or expense for Company-sponsored pension and other postretirement benefits is dependent, in part, on management’s selection of certain actuarial assumptions in calculating these amounts. These assumptions include, among other things, the discount rate, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the rates of increase in healthcare costs. These assumptions are disclosed in Note 13—Benefit Plans. Actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods.

The Company contributes to various multiemployer pension plans under collective bargaining agreements, primarily defined benefit pension plans. Pension expense for these plans is recognized as contributions are funded. In addition, the Company provides postretirement health and welfare benefits for certain groups of union and non-union employees. See Note 13—Benefit Plans for additional information on participation in multiemployer plans.

(Loss) Earnings Per Share

Basic (loss) earnings per share is calculated by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted (loss) earnings per share is calculated by adding the dilutive potential common shares to the weighted average number of common shares that were outstanding during the period. For purposes of the diluted earnings per share calculation, outstanding stock options, restricted stock units and performance-based awards, if applicable, are considered common stock equivalents, using the treasury stock method.

Treasury Stock

The Company records the repurchase of shares of common stock at cost based on the settlement date of the transaction. These shares are classified as Treasury stock, which is a reduction to Stockholders’ equity. Treasury stock is included in authorized and issued shares but excluded from outstanding shares.

On September 21, 2022, our Board of Directors authorized a repurchase program for up to $200 million of the Company’s common stock over a term offour years (the “2022 Repurchase Program”). Under the 2022 Repurchase Program, the Company repurchased approximately 1.9 million shares of its common stock for a total cost of $62 million in fiscal 2023. The Company didnot repurchase any shares of its common stock in fiscal 2025 or 2024. As of August 2, 2025, the Company had $138 million remaining authorized under the 2022 Repurchase Program. Refer to Note 9—Long-Term Debt for information on the Company’s credit facilities’ limitations on its ability to repurchase shares of common stock above certain levels unless certain conditions and financial tests are met.

Comprehensive (Loss) Income

Comprehensive (loss) income is reported in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income. Comprehensive (loss) income includes all changes in Stockholders’ equity during the reporting period, other than those resulting from investments by and distributions to stockholders. The Company’s comprehensive (loss) income is calculated as Net (loss) income including noncontrolling interests, plus or minus adjustments for foreign currency translation related to the translation of UNFI Canada, Inc. (“UNFI Canada”) from the functional currency of Canadian dollars to U.S. dollar reporting currency, changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax, and changes in defined pension and other postretirement benefit plan obligations, net of tax, less comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests.

Accumulated other comprehensive loss represents the cumulative balance of Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, as of the end of the reporting period and relates to foreign currency translation adjustments, and unrealized gains or losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax and changes in defined pension and other postretirement benefit plan obligations, net of tax.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates, fuel costs, and with the operation of UNFI Canada, foreign currency exchange rates. All derivatives are recognized on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value based on quoted market prices or estimates, and are recorded in either current or noncurrent assets or liabilities based on their maturity. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded in comprehensive (loss) income or net earnings, based on whether the instrument is designated and effective as a hedge transaction and, if so, the type of hedge transaction. Gains or losses on derivative instruments are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss and are reclassified to earnings in the period the hedged item affects earnings. If the hedged relationship ceases to exist, any associated amounts reported in Accumulated other comprehensive loss are reclassified to earnings at that time. The Company measures effectiveness of its hedging relationships both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis.

Self-Insurance Liabilities

The Company is primarily self-insured for workers’ compensation, general and automobile liability insurance. It is the Company’s policy to record the self-insured portion of workers’ compensation, general and automobile liabilities based upon actuarial methods to estimate the future cost of claims and related expenses that have been reported but not settled, and that have been incurred but not yet reported, discounted at a risk-free interest rate. The present value of such claims was calculated using a discount rate of 3.8% and 4.8% as of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024, respectively.

Changes in the Company’s self-insurance liabilities consisted of the following:

The current portion of the self-insurance liability was $31 million and $33 million as of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024, respectively, and is included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The long-term portions were $69 million and $56 million as of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024, respectively, and are included in Other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The self-insurance liabilities as of the end of the fiscal year are net of discounts of $9 million and $12 million as of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024, respectively. Amounts due from insurance companies were $25 million and $33 million as of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024, respectively, and are recorded in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other long-term assets.

Leases

At the inception or modification of a contract, the Company determines whether a lease exists and classifies its leases as an operating or finance lease at commencement. Subsequent to commencement, lease classification is only reassessed upon a change to the expected lease term or contract modification. Finance and operating lease assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset as lessee for the lease term, and lease obligations represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. These assets and obligations are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments, net of incentives, over the lease term. Incremental borrowing rates are estimated based on the Company’s borrowing rate as of the lease commencement date to determine the present value of lease payments, when the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable. Incremental borrowing rates are determined by using the yield curve based on the Company’s credit rating adjusted for the Company’s specific debt profile and secured debt risk. The lease asset also reflects any prepaid rent, initial direct costs incurred and lease incentives received. The Company’s lease terms include optional extension periods when it is reasonably certain that those options will be exercised. Leases with an initial expected term of 12 months or less are not recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the related lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For certain classes of underlying assets, the Company has elected to not separate fixed lease components from the fixed nonlease components.

The Company recognizes contractual obligations and receipts on a gross basis, such that the related lease obligation to the landlord is presented separately from the sublease created by the lease assignment to the assignee. As a result, the Company continues to recognize on its Consolidated Balance Sheets the operating lease assets and liabilities, and finance lease assets and obligations, for assigned leases.

The Company records operating lease expense and income using the straight-line method within Operating expenses, and lease income on a straight-line method for leases with its customers within Net sales. Finance lease expense is recognized as amortization expense within Operating expenses, and interest expense within Interest expense, net. For operating leases with step rent provisions whereby the rental payments increase over the life of the lease, and for leases with rent-free periods, the Company recognizes expense and income on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term, based on the total minimum lease payments to be made or lease receipts expected to be received. The Company is generally obligated for property tax, insurance and maintenance expenses related to leased properties, which often represent variable lease expenses. For contractual obligations on properties where the Company remains the primary obligor upon assignment of the lease and does not obtain a release from landlords or retain the equity interests in the legal entities with the related rent contracts, the Company continues to recognize rent expense and rent income within Operating expenses.

Operating and finance lease assets are reviewed for impairment based on an ongoing review of circumstances that indicate the assets may no longer be recoverable, such as closures of retail stores, distribution centers and other properties that are no longer being utilized in current operations, and other factors. The Company calculates operating and finance lease impairments using a discount rate to calculate the present value of estimated subtenant rentals that could be reasonably obtained for the property. Lease impairment charges for properties no longer used in operations are recorded as a component of Loss on sale of assets and other asset charges in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The calculation of lease impairment charges requires significant judgments and estimates, including estimated subtenant rentals, discount rates and future cash flows based on the Company’s experience and knowledge of the market in which the property is located, previous efforts to dispose of similar assets and the assessment of existing market conditions. Impairments are recognized as a reduction of the carrying value of the right of use asset and finance lease assets. Refer to Note 11—Leases for additional information.

For transactions in which an owned property is sold and leased back from the buyer, the Company recognizes a sale, and lease accounting is applied if the Company has transferred control of the property to the buyer. For such transactions, the Company removes the transferred assets from the Consolidated Balance Sheets and a gain or loss on the sale is recognized for the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and the fair value of the transaction as of the transaction date. If control of the underlying asset is not transferred, the Company does not recognize an asset sale and recognizes a financing lease liability for consideration received.

NOTE 2—RECENTLY ADOPTED AND ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2022, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2022-03, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions. ASU 2022-03 clarifies that a contractual restriction on the sale of an equity security is not part of the unit of account of the equity security and, therefore, is not considered in measuring fair value. The amendments in this update also require additional disclosures for equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions. The Company adopted this standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. ASU 2023-07 requires disclosure of significant segment expenses that are regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) and included within each reported measure of segment profit or loss, an amount and description of its composition for other segment items to reconcile to segment profit or loss, and the title and position of the entity’s CODM. The amendments in this update also expand the interim segment disclosure requirements. The Company adopted this standard in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, which resulted in additional disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 16—Business Segments for additional information.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. ASU 2023-09 requires disclosure of specific categories in the rate reconciliation and additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. The amendments also require disclosure on an annual basis of income taxes paid disaggregated by federal, state and foreign taxes as well as the amount of income taxes paid by individual jurisdiction. In addition, the amendments require disclosures of disaggregated pretax income and income tax expense and remove the requirement to disclose certain items that are no longer considered cost beneficial or relevant. The Company is required to adopt the amendments in this update in fiscal 2026. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this update should be applied on a prospective basis but can also be applied retrospectively. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of the amendments in this update and evaluating their impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. ASU 2024-03 requires disclosure on an annual and interim basis, in the notes to the financial statements, of disaggregated information about specific categories underlying certain income statement expense line items. The Company is required to adopt the amendments in this update in fiscal 2028, and the interim disclosure requirements will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2029. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this update should be applied on a prospective basis but can also be applied retrospectively. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of the amendments in this update and evaluating their impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3—REVENUE RECOGNITION

Product sales

The Company enters into wholesale customer distribution agreements that provide terms and conditions of our order fulfillment. The Company’s distribution agreements often specify levels of required minimum purchases in order to earn certain rebates or incentives. Certain contracts include rebates and other forms of variable consideration, including consideration payable to the customer up-front, over time or at the end of a contract term. Many of the Company’s contracts with customers outline various other promises to be performed in conjunction with the sale of product. The Company determined that these promises provided are immaterial within the overall context of the respective contract, and as such has not allocated the transaction price to these obligations.

In transactions for goods or services where the Company engages third parties to participate in its order fulfillment process, it evaluates whether it is the principal or an agent in the transaction. The Company’s analysis considers whether it controls the goods or services before they are transferred to its customer, including an evaluation of whether the Company has the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all the remaining benefits from, the specified good or service before it is transferred to the customer. Agent transactions primarily reflect circumstances where the Company is not involved in order fulfillment or where it is involved in the order fulfillment but is not contractually obligated to purchase the related goods or services from vendors, and instead extends wholesale customers credit by paying vendor trade accounts payable and does not control products prior to their sale. Under ASC 606, if the Company determines that it is acting in an agent capacity, transactions are recorded on a net basis. If the Company determines that it is acting in a principal capacity, transactions are recorded on a gross basis.

The Company also evaluates vendor sales incentives to determine whether they reduce the transaction price with its customers. The Company’s analysis considers which party tenders the incentive, whether the incentive reflects a direct reimbursement from a vendor, whether the incentive is influenced by or negotiated in conjunction with any other incentive arrangements and whether the incentive is subject to an agency relationship with the vendor, whether expressed or implied. Typically, when vendor incentives are offered directly by vendors to the Company’s customers, require the achievement of vendor-specified requirements to be earned by customers, and are not negotiated by the Company or in conjunction with any other incentive agreement whereby the Company does not control the direction or earning of these incentives, then Net sales are not reduced as part of the Company’s determination of the transaction price. In circumstances where the vendors provide the Company consideration to promote the sale of their goods and the Company determines the specific performance requirements for its customers to earn these incentives, Net sales and Cost of sales are reduced for these customer incentives as part of the determination of the transaction price.

Certain customer agreements provide for the right to license one or more of the Company’s tradenames, such as FESTIVAL FOODS®, SENTRY®, COUNTY MARKET®, FOODLAND®, and SUPERVALU®. In addition, the Company enters into franchise agreements to separately charge its customers, who the Company also sells wholesale products to, for the right to use its CUB® tradename. The Company typically does not separately charge for the right to license its tradenames. The Company believes that these tradenames are capable of being distinct, but are not distinct within the context of the contracts with its customers. Accordingly, the Company does not separately recognize revenue related to tradenames utilized by its customers.

The Company enters into distribution agreements with manufacturers to provide wholesale supplies to the Defense Commissary Agency (“DeCA”) and other government agency locations. DeCA contracts with manufacturers to obtain grocery products for the commissary system. The Company contracts with manufacturers to distribute products to the commissaries after being authorized by the manufacturers to be a military distributor to DeCA. The Company must adhere to DeCA’s delivery system procedures governing matters such as product identification, ordering and processing, information exchange and resolution of discrepancies. DeCA identifies the manufacturer with which an order is to be placed, determines which distributor is contracted by the manufacturer for a particular commissary or exchange location, and then places a product order with that distributor that is covered under DeCA’s master contract with the applicable manufacturer. The Company supplies product from its existing inventory, delivers it to the DeCA designated location, and bills the manufacturer for the product price plus a drayage fee. The manufacturer then bills DeCA under the terms of its master contract. The Company has determined that it controls the goods before they are transferred to the customer, and as such it is the principal in the transaction. Revenue is recognized on a gross basis when control of the product passes to the DeCA designated location.

Customer incentives

The Company provides incentives to its wholesale customers in various forms established under the applicable agreement, including advances, payments over time that are earned by achieving specified purchasing thresholds, and upon the passage of time. The Company typically records customer advances within Other long-term assets and Prepaid expenses and other current assets and typically recognizes customer incentive payments that are based on expected purchases over the term of the agreement as a reduction to Net sales. To the extent that the transaction price for product sales includes variable consideration, such as certain of these customer incentives, the Company estimates the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price primarily by utilizing the expected value method. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the agreement will not occur. The Company believes that there will not be significant changes to its estimates of variable consideration, as the uncertainty will be resolved within a relatively short time and there is a significant amount of historical data that is used in the estimation of the amount of variable consideration to be received. Therefore, the Company has not constrained its estimates of variable consideration.

Customer incentive assets are reviewed for impairment when circumstances exist for which the Company no longer expects to recover the applicable customer incentives.

Professional services and equipment sales

Separate from the services provided in conjunction with the sale of products described above, many of the Company’s agreements with customers also include distinct professional services and other promises to customers, in addition to the sale of the product itself, such as retail store support, advertising, store layout and design services, merchandising support, couponing, eCommerce, network and data hosting solutions, training and certifications classes, and administrative back-office solutions. These professional services may contain a single performance obligation for each respective service, in which case such services revenues are recognized when delivered. Revenues from professional services are less than 1% of total Net sales.

Wholesale equipment sales are recorded as direct sales to customers when control is transferred, which is typically upon delivery, consistent with the recognition of product sales.

Disaggregation of Revenues

Effective for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, the Company updated its segment reporting structure to align with how the business is operated and managed, following the divisional realignment and organizational changes announced during the second quarter of fiscal 2025. The Company disaggregates revenue by business division based on product and service offerings, and determined that disaggregating revenue at the segment level achieves the disclosure objective to depict how the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. Refer to Note 16—Business Segments for Net sales by reportable segment.

Sales to one customer in the Natural segment, which includes customers under common control, accounted for approximately 25%,23% and 22% of the Company’s net sales for fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. There were no other customers that individually generated 10% or more of the Company’s net sales during those periods.

The Company serves customers in the United States and Canada, as well as customers located in other countries. However, all of the Company’s revenue is earned in the United States and Canada, and international distribution occurs through freight-forwarders. The Company does not have any performance obligations on international shipments subsequent to delivery to the domestic port.

Contract Balances

The Company typically does not incur costs that are required to be capitalized in connection with obtaining a contract with a customer. The Company typically does not have any performance obligations to deliver products under its contracts until its customers submit a purchase order, as it stands ready to deliver product upon receipt of a purchase order under contracts with its customers. These performance obligations are generally satisfied within a very short period of time. Therefore, the Company has utilized the practical expedient that provides an exemption from disclosure of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations if the performance obligation is part of a contract that has an original expected duration of one year or less. The Company does not typically receive pre-payments from its customers.

Customer payments are due when control of goods or services are transferred to the customer and are typically not conditional on anything other than payment terms, which typically are less than 30 days. Since no significant financing components exist between the period of time the Company transfers goods or services to the customer and when it receives payment for those goods or services, the Company generally does not adjust the transaction price to recognize a financing component. Customer incentives are not considered contract assets as they are not generated through the transfer of goods or services to the customers. No material contract asset or liability exists for any period reported within these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounts and Notes Receivable Balances

Accounts and notes receivable are as follows:

The allowance for uncollectible receivables, and estimated variable consideration allowed for as sales concessions consists of the following:

In fiscal 2023, the Company entered into an agreement to sell, on a revolving basis, certain customer accounts receivable to a third-party financial institution. After these sales, the Company does not retain any interest in the receivables. The Company’s continuing involvement in transferred receivables is limited to servicing the receivables. Accounts receivable that the Company is servicing on behalf of the financial institution, which would have otherwise been outstanding as of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024, was approximately $380 million and $322 million, respectively. As of the end of fiscal 2025, the agreement allows for the Company to sell up to a maximum amount of $500 million of accounts receivable. Net proceeds received are included within cash from operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in the period of sale. The loss on sale of receivables was $19 million and $21 million for fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024, respectively, and is recorded within Loss on sale of assets and other asset charges in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

NOTE 4—RESTRUCTURING, ACQUISITION AND INTEGRATION RELATED EXPENSES

Restructuring, acquisition and integration related expenses were as follows:

Contract Termination Charges and Costs

In fiscal 2025, the Company mutually agreed to terminate its supply agreement with a customer in the East region, pursuant to which the Company served as the customer’s primary grocery wholesaler in the Northeast. The supply agreement terminated on September 6, 2025, and the customer’s conventional products business in the Northeast transitioned to another wholesaler. In connection with this termination agreement, the Company incurred a $53 million charge for contract termination payments that was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025. The first installment payment of $18 million was paid in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 and $35 million remained outstanding as of August 2, 2025. Subsequent to the end of fiscal 2025, an additional $18 million was paid and remaining installments are expected to be paid over a transition period ending in the first quarter of fiscal 2026.

Restructuring and Integration Costs

Restructuring and integration costs for fiscal 2025 primarily relate to costs associated with certain employee severance and other employee separation costs and outsourcing certain corporate functions under restructuring initiatives. Restructuring and integration costs for fiscal 2024 and 2023 primarily relate to costs associated with certain employee severance and other employee separation costs.

Closed Property Charges and Costs

Closed property charges for fiscal 2025 and 2024 primarily relate to non-operating distribution centers as the Company optimizes its distribution center network, and non-operating retail stores.

The following table provides the activity of restructuring liabilities for fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024, which are included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and Accrued compensation and benefits in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:

NOTE 5—PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:

The Company capitalized $9 million, $11 million and $5 million of interest during fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment was $250 million, $247 million and $232 million for fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

In fiscal 2025, as a result of the expected loss in volume related to the termination of the Company’s supply agreement with a customer in the East region, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that it would discontinue operations at the Allentown, Pennsylvania distribution center. As a result, the Company conducted an impairment review and recorded a $24 million non-cash asset impairment charge during the third quarter of fiscal 2025, of which $11 million related to property and equipment. The fair value utilized in the Company’s impairment analysis was determined based on the income approach, and the impairment charge is recorded within Loss on sale of assets and other asset charges in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Refer to Note 11—Leases for additional information.

In fiscal 2024, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that it would dispose ofone of its corporate-owned office locations before the end of its previously estimated useful life. As a result, the Company conducted an impairment review and recorded a $21 million non-cash asset impairment charge in fiscal 2024. The fair value utilized in the Company’s impairment review was determined based on the market approach, and the impairment charge is recorded within Loss on sale of assets and other asset charges in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024, the Company sold certain long-lived assets related to this corporate-owned office location for an amount that approximated its net book value at the time of the sale.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024, the Company recorded a $15 million non-cash impairment charge related to the decision to close certain leased and owned distribution center locations. During the third quarter of fiscal 2024, the Company recorded a $7 million non-cash asset impairment charge related to the decision to close certain retail store locations. The impairment charges are recorded within Loss on sale of assets and other asset charges in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

There wereno property and equipment impairment charges recorded for fiscal 2023.

NOTE 6—GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

Resulting from a change in reportable segments as described in Note 16—Business Segments, the Company reassessed its goodwill reporting units. As a result, certain reporting units were combined. The Company now hasfour goodwill reporting units: Natural, Conventional and Retail, which are each separate operating and reportable segments; and Woodstock Farms, which does not meet the criteria of an operating segment and is reported within the Natural segment.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023 the Company performed its annual goodwill qualitative impairment review and determined that a quantitative impairment test was not required for any of its reporting units.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Changes

The Company’s Goodwill balance as of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024 was $19 million, net of accumulated goodwill impairment charges of $727 million, and was only attributable to the Natural reporting unit. There wereno goodwill impairment charges during fiscal 2025, 2024 or 2023. Changes in the carrying value of Goodwill for fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024 were due to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Identifiable intangible assets, net consisted of the following:

The Company performed annual qualitative reviews of its indefinite lived trademarks and tradenames in fiscal 2025 and 2024, which indicated a quantitative assessment was not required.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2023, the Company decided to rationalize certain of its brands within its Blue Marble Brands portfolio, resulting in an abandonment of certain brands and a shortened life of remaining brand-related intangible assets. These changes were part of an effort for the Company to focus on its core private brand offerings. As a result, the Company recorded a $25 million intangible asset impairment charge in fiscal 2023 and began amortizing the remaining intangible assets associated with its Blue Marble Brands portfolio. The fair values utilized in the Company’s quantitative assessment were determined using the income approach, discounting projected future net cash flows based on management’s expectations of the current and future operating environment for each brand. The impairment charge is recorded within Loss on sale of assets and other asset charges in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Amortization expense was $71 million, $72 million and $72 million for fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The estimated future amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter on amortizing intangible assets existing as of August 2, 2025 is as shown below:

NOTE 7—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The following tables provide the fair value hierarchy for financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis:

Interest Rate Swap Contracts

The fair values of interest rate swap contracts are measured using Level 2 inputs. The interest rate swap contracts are valued using an income approach interest rate swap valuation model incorporating observable market inputs including interest rates, Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) swap rates and credit default swap rates. Refer to Note 8—Derivatives for further information on interest rate swap contracts.

Fuel Supply Agreements and Derivatives

To reduce diesel fuel price risk, the Company has entered into derivative financial instruments and/or forward purchase commitments for a portion of our projected monthly diesel fuel requirements at fixed prices. The fair values of fuel derivative agreements are measured using Level 2 inputs.

Foreign Exchange Derivatives

To reduce foreign exchange risk, the Company has entered into derivative financial instruments for a portion of our projected monthly foreign currency requirements at fixed prices. The fair values of foreign exchange derivatives are measured using Level 2 inputs.

Fair Value Estimates

For certain of the Company’s financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, accrued vacation, compensation and benefits, and other current assets and liabilities the fair values approximate carrying amounts due to their short maturities. The fair value of notes receivable is estimated by using a discounted cash flow approach prior to consideration for uncollectible amounts and is calculated by applying a market rate for similar instruments using Level 3 inputs. The fair value of debt is estimated based on market quotes, where available, or market values for similar instruments, using Level 2 and 3 inputs. In the table below, the carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt is net of original issue discounts and debt issuance costs. Refer to Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies for additional information regarding the fair value hierarchy.

NOTE 8—DERIVATIVES

Management of Interest Rate Risk

The Company enters into interest rate swap contracts from time to time to mitigate its exposure to changes in market interest rates as part of its overall strategy to manage its debt portfolio to achieve an overall desired position of notional debt amounts subject to fixed and floating interest rates. Interest rate swap contracts are entered into for periods consistent with related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. The Company’s interest rate swap contracts are designated as cash flow hedges. Interest rate swap contracts are reflected at their fair values in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 7—Fair Value Measurements of Financial Instruments for further information on the fair value of interest rate swap contracts.

Details of active swap contracts as of August 2, 2025, which are all pay fixed and receive floating, are as follows:

The Company performs an initial quantitative assessment of hedge effectiveness using the “Hypothetical Derivative Method” in the period in which the hedging transaction is entered. Under this method, the Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in cash flows of the designated hedged transactions. In future reporting periods, the Company performs a qualitative analysis for quarterly prospective and retrospective assessments of hedge effectiveness. The Company also monitors the risk of counterparty default on an ongoing basis and noted that the counterparties are reputable financial institutions. The entire change in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in Other comprehensive income (loss) (outside of earnings) in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income and subsequently reclassified to earnings in Interest expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations when the hedged transactions affect earnings.

The location and amount of gains or losses recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for interest rate swap contracts for each of the periods, presented on a pre-tax basis, are as follows:

NOTE 9—LONG-TERM DEBT

The Company’s long-term debt consisted of the following:

(1) Face value before debt issuance costs of $4 million and $6 million, respectively and an original issue discount on debt of $7 million and $10 million, respectively.

(2) Face value before debt issuance costs of $5 million and $7 million, respectively.

(3) Face value before debt issuance costs of $4 million and $5 million, respectively.

Future maturities of long-term debt, excluding debt issuance costs and original issue and purchase accounting discounts on debt, and contractual interest payments based on the face value and applicable interest rate as of August 2, 2025, consist of the following (in millions):

Term Loan Facility

The term loan agreement dated as of October 22, 2018 (as amended, the “Term Loan Agreement”) provides for a $500 million senior secured first lien term loan (the “Term Loan Facility”), which is scheduled to mature on May 1, 2031, with a springing maturity of 91 days prior to the maturity of the Senior Notes (defined below), in the event that at least $100 million in principal amount outstanding of such Senior Notes remains outstanding on such date.

Under the Term Loan Agreement, the Company may, at its option, increase the amount of the Term Loan Facility or add one or more additional tranches of term loans or revolving credit commitments, without the consent of any lenders not participating in such additional borrowings, up to an aggregate amount of $546 million plus additional amounts based on satisfaction of certain leverage ratio tests, subject to certain customary conditions and applicable lenders committing to provide the additional funding. There can be no assurance that additional funding would be available.

The obligations under the Term Loan Facility are guaranteed by most of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Guarantors”), subject to customary exceptions and limitations. The Term Loan Facility is secured by (i) a first-priority lien on substantially all assets other than the ABL Assets (defined below) and (ii) a second-priority lien on substantially all of the ABL Assets, in each case, subject to customary exceptions and limitations, including an exception for owned real property (other than distribution centers) with net book values of less than or equal to $10 million. As of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024, there was $642 million and $686 million, respectively, of owned real property pledged as collateral that was included in Property and equipment, net and Prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company must prepay loans outstanding under the Term Loan Facility no later than 130 days after the fiscal year end in an aggregate principal amount equal to a specified percentage of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement), minus certain types of voluntary prepayments of indebtedness made during such fiscal year. Based on our Consolidated First Lien Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement) at the end of fiscal 2025, no such prepayment will be required under the Term Loan Facility in fiscal 2026.

As of August 2, 2025, the borrowings under the Term Loan Facility bear interest at rates that, at the Term Borrowers’ option, can be either: (i) a base rate plus a margin of 3.75% or (ii) a SOFR rate plus a margin of 4.75%, provided that the SOFR rate shall never be less than 0.0%.

On May 5, 2025, the Company made a voluntary prepayment of $100 million on the Term Loan Facility funded with incremental borrowings under the ABL Credit Facility. In connection with this prepayment, the Company incurred a loss on debt extinguishment of $4 million related to unamortized debt issuance costs, unamortized original issue discount and the required 1.00% prepayment premium, which was recorded within Interest expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025.

On May 30, 2025, the Company made a voluntary prepayment of $10 million and a mandatory prepayment of $1 million on the Term Loan Facility with proceeds from the sale of the Billings, Montana distribution center.

ABL Credit Facility

The revolving credit agreement dated as of June 3, 2022, (as amended, the “ABL Loan Agreement”) provides for a secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Credit Facility”) with an aggregate principal amount available of up to $2,730 million, including Revolver Loans (as defined in the ABL Loan Agreement) of up to $2,600 million and a First In, Last Out (“FILO”) tranche of incremental ABL loans of $130 million (the “ABL FILO Loan”). The ABL Credit Facility is scheduled to mature on June 3, 2027.

Under the ABL Loan Agreement, the aggregate amount of the ABL Credit Facility may be increased in an amount of up to $620 million without the consent of any lenders not participating in such increase, subject to certain customary conditions and applicable lenders committing to provide the increase in funding. There can be no assurance that additional funding would be available.

Revolver Loans and ABL FILO Loans under the ABL Credit Facility bear interest at rates that, at the Company’s option, can be either at a base rate or Term SOFR plus an applicable margin. The applicable margins and letter of credit fees under the ABL Credit Facility are variable and are dependent upon the prior fiscal quarter’s daily average Availability (as defined in the ABL Loan Agreement), and were as follows:

(1) The Company utilizes SOFR-based loans and UNFI Canada utilizes bankers’ acceptance rate-based loans.

The ABL Credit Facility is guaranteed by the Guarantors, subject to customary exceptions and limitations. The ABL Credit Facility is secured by (i) a first-priority lien on certain accounts receivable, inventory and certain other assets (collectively, the “ABL Assets”) and (ii) a second-priority lien on all other assets that do not constitute ABL Assets, in each case, subject to customary exceptions and limitations.

Availability under the ABL Credit Facility is subject to a borrowing base consisting of specified percentages of the value of eligible accounts receivable, credit card receivables, inventory, pharmacy receivables and pharmacy prescription files, after adjusting for customary reserves, but at no time shall exceed the aggregate commitments plus the outstanding ABL FILO Loans under the ABL Credit Facility (currently $2,730 million).

The assets included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets securing the outstanding obligations under the ABL Credit Facility on a first-priority basis were as follows:

As of August 2, 2025, the borrowing base was $2,636 million, reflecting the advance rates described above and $105 million of reserves, which is below the $2,730 million limit of availability. This resulted in total availability of $2,636 million for loans and letters of credit under the ABL Credit Facility. The Company’s unused credit under the ABL Credit Facility was as follows:

Senior Notes

On October 22, 2020, the Company issued $500 million of unsecured 6.750% senior notes due October 15, 2028 (the “Senior Notes”). The Senior Notes are guaranteed by each of the Company’s subsidiaries that are borrowers under or that guarantee the ABL Credit Facility or the Term Loan Facility (defined above).

Debt Covenants

Our debt agreements contain certain customary operational and informational covenants. These include, among other things, restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, create liens on assets, make loans or investments, or return capital to stockholders through share repurchases or paying dividends. If the Company fails to comply with any of these covenants, it may be in default under the applicable debt agreement, and all amounts due thereunder may become immediately due and payable.

The ABL Loan Agreement also subjects the Company to a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.0 to 1.0 calculated at the end of each of the Company’s fiscal quarters on a rolling four quarter basis, if the adjusted aggregate availability is ever less than the greater of (i) $220 million, or $210 million if no ABL FILO Loans are then outstanding at such time, and (ii)10% of the borrowing base. The Term Loan Agreement and Senior Notes do not include any financial maintenance covenants.

NOTE 10—COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME AND ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

Changes in Accumulated other comprehensive loss by component, net of tax, for fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023 are as follows:

Items reclassified out of Accumulated other comprehensive loss had the following impact on the Consolidated Statements of Operations:

(1)Reclassification of amounts included in net periodic benefit income include reclassification of prior service cost and reclassification of net actuarial gain loss as reflected in Note 13—Benefit Plans.

As of August 2, 2025, the Company expects to reclassify a de minimis amount related to unrealized derivative gains out of Accumulated other comprehensive loss and primarily into Interest expense, net during the following twelve-month period.

NOTE 11—LEASES

The Company leases certain of its distribution centers, retail stores, office facilities, transportation equipment and other operating equipment from third parties. Many of these leases include renewal options. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

Lease assets and liabilities, net, are as follows (in millions):

The Company’s lease cost under ASC 842 is as follows (in millions):

(1)Includes $32 million, $28 million and $27 million of lease expense in fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and $(26) million, $(28) million, and $(28) million of lease income in fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, that is recorded within Restructuring, acquisition and integration related expenses for assigned leases related to previously sold locations and surplus, non-operating properties for which the Company is restructuring its obligations.

As discussed in Note 5—Property and Equipment, Net, the Company recorded a $24 million non-cash asset impairment charge related to our Allentown, Pennsylvania distribution center during the third quarter of fiscal 2025, of which $13 million related to operating lease assets. The impairment charge is recorded within Loss on sale of assets and other asset charges in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During fiscal 2025, the Company entered into a lease agreement for a new distribution center in Sarasota, Florida. We recognized a $118 million right-of-use asset and operating lease liability for this distribution center in the Consolidated Balance Sheets upon its commencement in the first quarter of fiscal 2025.

During fiscal 2023, the Company entered into a lease agreement for a new distribution center in Manchester, Pennsylvania. We recognized a $205 million right-of-use asset and operating lease liability for this distribution center in the Consolidated Balance Sheets upon its commencement in the second quarter of fiscal 2024.

The Company leases certain property to third parties and receives lease and subtenant rental payments under operating leases, including assigned leases for which the Company has future minimum lease payment obligations. Future minimum lease payments (“Lease Liabilities”) include payments to be made by the Company or certain third parties in the case of assigned noncancellable operating leases and finance leases. Future minimum lease and subtenant rentals (“Lease Receipts”) include expected cash receipts from operating subleases, and in the case of assigned noncancellable leases receipts for stores sold to third parties, which they operate. As of August 2, 2025, these Lease Liabilities and Lease Receipts consisted of the following (in millions):

(1)There were no operating leases for which the extension options are reasonably certain of being exercised, nor were there any excluded legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced.

(2)There were no finance leases for which the extension options are reasonably certain of being exercised, nor were there any excluded legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced.

(3)Calculated using the interest rate for each lease.

The following tables provide other information required by ASC 842:

NOTE 12—SHARE-BASED AWARDS

As of August 2, 2025, the Company had restricted stock awards and performance share units outstanding under the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated from time to time (the “2020 Equity Incentive Plan”). The terms of each stock-based award will be determined by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee thereof. As of August 2, 2025, the Company had 2.6 million shares authorized and available for grant under the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

The following table presents information regarding share-based compensation expenses and the related tax impacts:

Vesting requirements for awards are generally at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee thereof. Time-based vesting awards for employees typically vest inthree equal installments. The Board of Directors has adopted a policy in connection with the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan that sets forth grant, vesting and settlement dates for equity awards, aone-year vesting period for awards issued to non-employee directors, and athree-year equal installment vesting period for designated employee restricted stock awards. Performance awards have athree-year cliff vest, subject to achievement of the performance objective. As of August 2, 2025, there was $82 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding share-based compensation arrangements (including restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units). This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.

Restricted Stock Awards

The fair value of restricted stock units and performance share units are determined based on the number of units granted and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock as of the grant date. Restricted stock units include liability-classified awards granted during fiscal 2025, that can or will be settled in cash. Liability-classified awards are remeasured at the end of each reporting period. The Company recorded total liabilities for cash-settled share-based compensation awards of $6 million as of August 2, 2025, of which the entire amount was classified as current. The Company had no liabilities for cash-settled share-based compensation awards as of August 3, 2024. No amounts were paid related to settlement for liability-classified awards in fiscal 2025, 2024 or 2023.

The following summary presents information regarding restricted stock units and performance share units:

Performance-Based Share Awards

During fiscal 2025, the Company granted 0.5 million equity-classified performance share units, included in the granted number in the above table, to its executives and other senior leaders (subject to the issuance of up to 0.5 million additional shares if the Company’s performance exceeds specified targeted levels) with a weighted average grant-date fair value of $28.22. These performance units are tied to 3-year cumulative fiscal 2025, 2026 and 2027 performance metrics, including adjusted earnings per share (“EPS”) and free cash flow. An insignificant amount of performance share units granted in fiscal 2025 were forfeited during fiscal 2025.

During fiscal 2024, the Company granted 0.8 million equity-classified performance share units, included in the granted number in the above table, to its executives and other senior leaders (subject to the issuance of up to 1.0 million additional shares if the Company’s performance exceeds specified targeted levels) with a weighted average grant-date fair value of $16.38. These performance units are tied to fiscal 2024, 2025 and 2026 performance metrics, including adjusted EPS growth and adjusted return on invested capital (“ROIC”). An insignificant amount of performance share units granted in fiscal 2024 were forfeited during fiscal 2025.

During fiscal 2023, the Company granted 0.4 million equity-classified performance share units, included in the granted number in the above table, to its executives and other senior leaders (subject to the issuance of up to 0.4 million additional shares if the Company’s performance exceeds specified targeted levels) with a weighted average grant-date fair value of $36.87. These performance units were tied to fiscal 2023, 2024 and 2025 performance metrics, including adjusted EPS growth and adjusted ROIC. An insignificant amount of performance share units granted in fiscal 2023 were forfeited during fiscal 2025.

Stock Options

The Company didnot grant options in fiscal 2025, 2024 or 2023. The following summary presents information regarding outstanding stock options as of August 2, 2025 and changes during the fiscal year then ended:

The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $0 million for each of the fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023 years.

NOTE 13—BENEFIT PLANS

The Company’s employees who participate are covered by various contributory and non-contributory pension, 401(k) plans, and other health and welfare benefits. The Company’s primary defined benefit pension plans are the SUPERVALU INC. Retirement Plan and certain supplemental executive retirement plans. All of these plans are closed to new participants. Service crediting in the SUPERVALU INC. Retirement Plan ended for all participants as of December 31, 2007, and pay increases were reflected in the amount of benefits accrued in this plan until December 31, 2012. Approximately 62% of the 10,768 union employees participate in multiemployer defined benefit pension plans under collective bargaining agreements. The remaining either participate in plans sponsored by the Company or are not currently eligible to participate in a retirement plan. In addition to sponsoring both defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans, the Company provides healthcare and life insurance benefits for eligible retired employees under postretirement benefit plans. The Company also provides certain health and welfare benefits, including short-term and long-term disability benefits, to inactive disabled employees prior to retirement. The terms of the postretirement benefit plans vary based on employment history, age and date of retirement. For many retirees, the Company provides a fixed dollar contribution and retirees pay contributions to fund the remaining cost.

Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

For the defined benefit pension plans, the accumulated benefit obligation is equal to the projected benefit obligation. The benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and funded status of our defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following:

The actuarial gain on projected pension benefit obligations in fiscal 2025 was primarily the result of a 28 basis point increase in the discount rate on the SUPERVALU INC. Retirement Plan. The actuarial gain on projected pension benefit obligations in fiscal 2024 was primarily the result of an 8 basis point increase in the discount rate on the SUPERVALU INC. Retirement Plan.

The funded status of our pension benefits contains plans with individually funded and underfunded statuses. Our other postretirement benefits consist of one plan as shown above. The following table provides the funded status of individual projected pension benefit plan obligations and the fair value of plan assets for these plans:

Net periodic benefit (income) cost and other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized consist of the following:

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024 consist of the following:

Benefit Plan Assumptions

Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit (income) cost consisted of the following:

(1) Expected return on plan assets is estimated by utilizing forward-looking, long-term return, risk and correlation assumptions developed and updated annually by the Company. These assumptions are weighted by the actual or target allocation to each underlying asset class represented in the pension plan master trust. The Company also assesses the expected long-term return on plan assets assumption by comparison to long-term historical performance on an asset class basis to ensure the assumption is reasonable. Long-term trends are also evaluated relative to market factors such as inflation, interest rates, and fiscal and monetary policies in order to assess the capital market assumptions.

The Company reviews and selects the discount rate to be used in connection with measuring its pension and other postretirement benefit obligations annually. In determining the discount rate, the Company uses the yield on corporate bonds (rated AA or better) that coincides with the cash flows of the plans’ estimated benefit payouts. The model uses a yield curve approach to discount each cash flow of the liability stream at an interest rate specifically applicable to the timing of each respective cash flow. The model totals the present values of all cash flows and calculates the equivalent weighted average discount rate by imputing the singular interest rate that equates the total present value with the stream of future cash flows. This resulting weighted average discount rate is then used in evaluating the final discount rate to be used.

For those retirees whose health plans provide for variable employer contributions, the assumed healthcare cost trend rate used in measuring the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation before age 65 was 8.30% as of August 2, 2025. The assumed healthcare cost trend rate for retirees before age 65 will decrease each year through fiscal 2035, until it reaches the ultimate trend rate of 4.50%. For those retirees whose health plans provide for variable employer contributions, the assumed healthcare cost trend rate used in measuring the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation after age 65 was 6.60% as of August 2, 2025.

Pension Plan Assets

Pension plan assets are held in a master trust and invested in separately managed accounts and commingled investment vehicles holding fixed income securities, domestic equity securities, private equity securities, international equity securities and real estate securities. The Company employs a liability hedging approach, targeting a level of risk commensurate with keeping pace with the long-term cost of funding plan liabilities. Risk is managed through diversification across asset classes, multiple investment manager portfolios and both general and portfolio-specific investment guidelines. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of the plan liabilities, plan funded status and the Company’s financial condition. This asset allocation policy mix is reviewed annually and actual versus target allocations are monitored regularly and rebalanced on an as-needed basis. Plan assets are invested using a combination of active and passive investment strategies. Passive, or “indexed” strategies, attempt to mimic rather than exceed the investment performance of a market benchmark. The plan’s active investment strategies employ multiple investment management firms. Managers within each asset class cover a range of investment styles and approaches and are combined in a way that controls for capitalization, and style biases (equities) and interest rate exposures (fixed income) versus benchmark indices. Monitoring activities to evaluate performance against targets and measure investment risk take place on an ongoing basis through annual liability measurements, periodic asset/liability studies and quarterly investment portfolio reviews.

The asset allocation targets and the actual allocation of pension plan assets are as follows:

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for investments measured at fair value:

Common stock- Valued at the closing price reported in the active market in which the individual securities are traded.

Common collective trusts- Investments in common/collective trust funds are stated at net asset value (“NAV”) as determined by the issuer of the common/collective trust funds and is based on the fair value of the underlying investments held by the fund less its liabilities. The majority of the common/collective trust funds have a readily determinable fair value and are classified as Level 2. Other investments in common/collective trust funds determine NAV on a less frequent basis and/or have redemption restrictions. For these investments, NAV is used as a practical expedient to estimate fair value.

Corporate bonds- Valued based on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings. When quoted prices are not available for identical or similar bonds, the fair value is based upon an industry valuation model, which maximizes observable inputs.

Government securities- Certain government securities are valued at the closing price reported in the active market in which the security is traded. Other government securities are valued based on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings.

Mortgage backed securities- Valued based on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings. When quoted prices are not available for identical or similar securities, the fair value is based upon an industry valuation model, which maximizes observable inputs.

Private equity and real estate partnerships- Valued based on NAV provided by the investment manager, updated for any subsequent partnership interests’ cash flows or expected changes in fair value. The NAV is used as a practical expedient to estimate fair value.

Other- Consists primarily of options, futures, and money market investments priced at $1 per unit.

The valuation methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement.

The fair value of assets held in the master trust for defined benefit pension plans as of August 2, 2025, by asset category, consisted of the following (in millions):

The fair value of assets held in the master trust for defined benefit pension plans as of August 3, 2024, by asset category, consisted of the following (in millions):

Contributions

No minimum pension contributions were required to be made under the SUPERVALU INC. Retirement Plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, (“ERISA”) in fiscal 2025. The Company expects to contribute approximately $1 million to its other defined benefit pension plans and $1 million to its postretirement benefit plans in fiscal 2026.

The Company funds its defined benefit pension plans based on the minimum contribution required under the Internal Revenue Code, ERISA, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 and other applicable laws, as determined by our external actuarial consultant, and additional contributions made at its discretion. The Company may accelerate contributions or undertake contributions in excess of the minimum requirements from time to time subject to the availability of cash in excess of operating and financing needs or other factors as may be applicable. The Company assesses the relative attractiveness of the use of cash considering such factors as expected return on assets, discount rates, cost of debt, reducing or eliminating required Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation variable rate premiums or the ability to achieve exemption from participant notices of underfunding.

Estimated Future Benefit Payments

The estimated future benefit payments to be made from our defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans, which reflect expected future service, are as follows (in millions):

Defined Contribution Plan

The Company sponsors a defined contribution and profit sharing plan pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employees may contribute a portion of their eligible compensation to the plan on a pre-tax or after-tax Roth basis. The Company matches a portion of certain employee contributions by contributing cash into the investment options selected by the employees. The total amount contributed by the Company to the plan is determined by plan provisions or at the Company’s discretion. Total employer contribution expenses for this plan were $31 million, $30 million and $30 million for fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Post-Employment Benefits

The Company recognizes an obligation for benefits provided to former or inactive employees. The Company is self-insured for certain disability plan programs, which comprise the primary benefits paid to inactive employees prior to retirement.

As of August 2, 2025 there was $3 million of Accrued compensation and benefits and $1 million of Other long-term liabilities recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of August 3, 2024 there was $3 million of Accrued compensation and benefits and $2 million of Other long-term liabilities.

Multiemployer Pension Plans

The Company contributes to various multiemployer pension plans under collective bargaining agreements, primarily defined benefit pension plans. These multiemployer plans generally provide retirement benefits to participants based on their service to contributing employers. The benefits are paid from assets held in trust for that purpose. Plan trustees are typically responsible for determining the level of benefits to be provided to participants as well as the investment of the assets and plan administration. Trustees are appointed in equal number by employers and the unions that are parties to the relevant collective bargaining agreements.

Expense is recognized in connection with these plans as contributions are funded, in accordance with GAAP. The risks of participating in these multiemployer plans are different from the risks associated with single-employer plans in the following respects:

•Assets contributed to the multiemployer plan by one employer are held in trust and may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers.

•If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers.

•If the Company chose to stop participating in some multiemployer plans, or to make market exits or closures or otherwise have participation in the plan drop below certain levels, it may be required to pay those plans an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.

The Company’s participation in these plans is outlined in the table below. The EIN-Pension Plan Number column provides the Employer Identification Number (“EIN”) and the three-digit plan number, if applicable. Unless otherwise noted, the most recent Pension Protection Act (“PPA”) zone status relates to the plans’ most recent fiscal year-end for which information is available. The zone status is based on information that we received from the plan or that the plan otherwise makes available and is annually certified by each plan’s actuary. Among other factors, deep red zone status or critical and declining plans are generally less than 65% funded and are projected to become insolvent within 15 to 20 years, red zone status plans are generally less than 65% funded and are considered in critical status, yellow zone status plans are less than 80% funded and are considered in endangered or seriously endangered status, and green zone plans are at least 80% funded. The FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented column indicates plans for which a funding improvement plan (“FIP”) or a rehabilitation plan (“RP”) is either pending or has been implemented by the trustees of each plan. The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA”) established the Special Financial Assistance (“SFA”) Program to permit financially troubled multiemployer plans to apply to receive a cash payment intended to keep plans solvent and able to pay benefits through 2051. As of August 2, 2025, two plans in which the Company participates have received SFA, and one other plan in which the Company participates received SFA subsequent to the end of fiscal 2025.

Certain plans have been aggregated in the All Other Multiemployer Pension Plans line in the following table, as the contributions to each of these plans are not individually material. The collective bargaining agreements specify the contribution rates per unit to these plans and do not specify a minimum dollar amount.

At the date the financial statements were issued, Form 5500 for these plans were generally not available for the plan years ending in 2024.

The following table contains information about the Company’s significant multiemployer plans from which the Company has not withdrawn (in millions):

(1) PPA surcharges are 5% or 10% of eligible contributions and may not apply to all collective bargaining agreements or total contributions to each plan.

(2) All Other Multiemployer Pension Plans includes 5 plans, none of which are individually significant when considering contributions to the plan, severity of the underfunded status or other factors.

The following table describes the expiration of the Company’s collective bargaining agreements associated with the significant multiemployer plans in which we participate:

(1) Company participating employees in the most significant collective bargaining agreement as a percent of all Company employees represented under the applicable collective bargaining agreements.

As of August 2, 2025, accrued multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities included in Other long-term liabilities and Accrued compensation and benefits were $61 million and $6 million, respectively, for 13 multiemployer plans. As of August 3, 2024 amounts included in Other long-term liabilities and Accrued compensation and benefits were $66 million and $6 million, respectively. Payments associated with these liabilities are required to be made over varying time periods, but principally over the next 20 years.

Multiemployer Benefit Plans Other than Pensions

The Company also makes contributions to multiemployer health and welfare plans in amounts set forth in the related collective bargaining agreements. These plans provide medical, dental, pharmacy, vision and other ancillary benefits to active employees and retirees as determined by the trustees of each plan. The vast majority of the Company’s contributions benefit active employees and as such, may not constitute contributions to a postretirement benefit plan. With respect to most multiemployer health and welfare plans to which the Company contributes, contribution amounts to postretirement benefit plans are not able to be separated from contribution amounts paid to benefit active employees.

The Company contributed $90 million, $88 million and $85 million in fiscal 2025, fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023, respectively, to multiemployer health and welfare plans. If healthcare provisions within these plans cannot be renegotiated in a manner that reduces the prospective healthcare cost as we intend, our Operating expenses could increase in the future.

Collective Bargaining Agreements

As of August 2, 2025, we had approximately 25,600 employees. Approximately 10,768 employees are covered by 57 collective bargaining agreements, including existing agreements under negotiation. During fiscal 2025,10 collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 3,385 employees were renegotiated, including 1 collective bargaining agreement that had expired in fiscal 2024 but was negotiated in fiscal 2025. Additionally,10 new collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 1,119 employees were negotiated. During fiscal 2026,12 collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 3,381 employees are scheduled to expire.

NOTE 14—INCOME TAXES

Income Tax Benefit

For fiscal 2025, (loss) income before income taxes consists of $(163) million from U.S. operations and $9 million from foreign operations. (Loss) income before income taxes for fiscal 2024 consists of $(145) million from U.S. operations and $8 million from foreign operations. (Loss) income before income taxes for fiscal 2023 consists of ($1) million from U.S. operations and $8 million from foreign operations.

The income tax benefit was allocated as follows:

Total federal, state and foreign income tax benefit consists of the following:

Total income tax benefit was different than the amounts computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes because of the following:

Uncertain Tax Positions

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

In addition, the Company hasno thing paid on deposit to any governmental agencies to cover the above liability. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. For fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, total accrued interest and penalties was $2 million, $2 million and $1 million, respectively.

The Company is currently under examination in several taxing jurisdictions and remains subject to examination until the statute of limitations expires for the respective taxing jurisdiction or an agreement is reached between the taxing jurisdiction and the Company. As of August 2, 2025, the Company is no longer subject to comprehensive federal income tax examinations for fiscal years before 2016 and in most states is no longer subject to state income tax examinations for fiscal years before 2016 for Supervalu and the Company. Due to the implementation of the CARES Act, net operating losses were carried back into fiscal years 2014 and 2015, which extends the federal statute of limitations on those years up to the amount of the carryback claim.

Based on the possibility of the closing of pending audits and appeals, or expiration of the statute of limitations, the Company anticipates that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by approximately $5 million during the next 12 months.

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the net deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024 are presented below:

Tax Credits and Valuation Allowances

At August 2, 2025, the Company had gross deferred tax assets of approximately $718 million. The Company regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability to evaluate whether it is more likely than not that they will be realized. In making this evaluation, the Company considers the statutory recovery periods for the assets, along with available sources of future taxable income, including reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, tax planning strategies, history of taxable income, and projections of future income. The Company gives more significance to objectively verifiable evidence, such as the existence of deferred tax liabilities that are forecast to generate taxable income within the relevant carryover periods, and a history of earnings. A valuation allowance is provided when the Company concludes, based on all available evidence, that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized during the applicable recovery period. The Company has reviewed these factors in evaluating the recoverability of its deferred tax assets. As of August 2, 2025, the Company anticipates sufficient future taxable income to realize all of its deferred tax assets within the applicable recovery periods with the exception of certain foreign tax credits, charitable contribution carryovers and state net operating losses. Accordingly, the Company has established valuation allowances against that portion of its charitable contribution carryovers, state net operating losses and foreign tax credits that, in the Company’s judgment, are not likely to be realized within the applicable recovery periods.

At August 2, 2025, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $0.2 million for federal income tax purposes that are subject to an annual limitation of approximately $0.1 million under Internal Revenue Code Section 382. These Section 382-limited carryforwards expire at various times through fiscal year 2027. As of August 2, 2025, the Company anticipates sufficient future taxable income over the periods in which the net operating losses can be utilized. The Company also has the availability of future reversals of taxable temporary differences that are expected to generate taxable income in the future. Therefore, the ultimate realization of net operating losses for federal purposes appears more likely than not at August 2, 2025 and correspondingly no valuation allowance has been established.

At August 2, 2025, the Company had gross disallowed charitable contribution carryforwards of approximately $76 million that are available for carryforward over five years. As of August 2, 2025, the Company anticipates sufficient future taxable income to utilize $37 million of these gross charitable contribution carryovers within the applicable five-year carryforward periods. The Company has established a valuation allowance against the gross $39 million of charitable contribution carryovers that, in the Company’s judgment, are not likely to be realized within the applicable recovery period.

The retained earnings of the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiary were subject to deemed U.S. repatriation and taxation during fiscal 2017 pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and existing foreign tax credits were utilized to offset the resulting liability. We have established a deferred tax asset for the remaining U.S. foreign tax credits of $1 million. Such credits are offset by a valuation allowance.

One Big Beautiful Bill Act

The One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”), was signed into law on July 4, 2025. ASC 740, “Income Taxes”, requires the effects of changes in tax laws to be recognized in the period in which the legislation is enacted. The OBBBA includes numerous provisions that affect corporate taxation, including the immediate expensing of domestic research and development costs and modifying the interest expense limitation. The Company has analyzed the impacts of the OBBBA and reflected them in the current period. The impact of these changes required the Company to re-evaluate its deferred taxes and subsequently record an increase in the valuation allowance of $7 million in the quarter related to future anticipated expirations of charitable carryovers. The provisions in the legislation are generally effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2026 and is ultimately expected to decrease its fiscal 2026 cash tax payments, due to the increase in the interest expense limitation to tax EBITDA and the current expensing of domestic research costs.

Effective Tax Rate

The Company’s effective tax rate was a benefit rate of 25.3% on pre-tax loss for fiscal 2025 as compared to benefit rate of 19.7% on pre-tax loss for fiscal 2024 and a benefit rate of 328.6% on pre-tax income for fiscal 2023. For fiscal 2023, the effective tax rate was impacted by solar credits, including the tax credit impact of a fiscal 2023 investment in an equity method partnership and solar credits associated with a solar array installation at the Company’s Howell Township, New Jersey facility. The effective tax rate was also impacted by the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits and excess tax deductions attributable to share-based compensation. The combined impact of these fiscal 2023 tax benefits exceeded pre-tax income, generating an overall tax benefit rate for fiscal 2023. For fiscal 2024, the effective tax rate was impacted by non-deductible share-based compensation and the establishment of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets with limited lives. For fiscal 2025, the effective tax rate was impacted by the establishment of valuation allowances against deferred tax assets with limited lives resulting from the OBBBA, partially offset by the tax credit impact of a fiscal 2025 investment in an equity method partnership.

NOTE 15—(LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following is a reconciliation of the basic and diluted number of shares used in computing (loss) earnings per share:

(1)(Loss) earnings per share amounts are calculated using actual unrounded figures.

NOTE 16—BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company regularly monitors for events or circumstances that would indicate a change in reportable segments. Effective for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, the Company restructured its internal financial reporting and management processes to align with its new product-centered divisional structure, which required the Company to reevaluate its operating segments. Based on the changes to the commercial wholesale organizational structure and how the Company’s CODM assesses performance and makes decisions about the allocation of resources to each operating segment, operations previously reported in Wholesale are now included in the Natural and Conventional segments, and certain operations previously reported in Other are now included in the Natural segment. The Company now hasthree reportable segments: Natural, Conventional and Retail. Prior periods have been recast to conform to the Company’s new reportable operating segments. Reportable segments are reviewed on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate a change in reportable segments has occurred.

The Natural reportable segment is engaged in the wholesale distribution of natural, organic and specialty grocery and non-food products and services and includes the Company’s portfolio of natural owned brands and natural and organic snack food manufacturing business. The Conventional reportable segment is engaged in the wholesale distribution of conventional grocery and non-food products and services and includes the Company’s portfolio of conventional owned brands. The Retail reportable segment derives revenues from the sale of groceries and other products at the Company’s grocery and liquor stores operating under the Cub® Foods and Shoppers® banners. Intersegment sales represent sales between the segments, which are eliminated in consolidation. Intersegment transactions are generally recorded at amounts that approximate market value.

The Company’s CODM is the Chief Executive Officer. The Company’s CODM uses segment Adjusted EBITDA as the measure of segment profitability to assess the performance and core business trends of each segment through regular review of financial information, and when making decisions about the allocation of resources to each segment. The Company’s CODM uses segment Adjusted EBITDA primarily as a part of the annual budget and forecasting process. Segment Adjusted EBITDA includes revenues and costs attributable to each of the respective business segments and certain allocated corporate expenses, based on the segment’s estimated consumption of corporately managed resources.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025, the Company updated allocation methodologies for its measure of segment Adjusted EBITDA to exclude a portion of centrally-managed corporate functions, which include, but are not limited to, corporate legal operations, investor relations, treasury, certain enterprise-wide information technology and other corporate operating expenses that are not integral to segment performance and are included in Corporate and Other. The prior period segment financial results have been recast to conform to the current allocation methodology. This change did not impact the Company’s previously reported consolidated results. Corporate and Other excludes items such as restructuring, acquisition and integration related expenses and share-based compensation. These items are excluded from the definition of Adjusted EBITDA and are added back to reconcile segment Adjusted EBITDA to (Loss) income before income taxes.

The Company does not report total assets by segment for internal or external reporting purposes as the Company’s CODM does not assess performance or allocate resources based on segment assets. Additionally, the Company does not record its revenues within its Natural nor Conventional reportable segments for financial reporting purposes by product group, and it is therefore impracticable for it to report them accordingly.

The following tables provide financial information for each reportable segment and Corporate and Other, along with a reconciliation to (Loss) income before income taxes:

(1)The significant expense categories and amounts align with the segment-level information that is regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker.

(2)Other segment items for each reportable segment include:

•Retail – other operating costs such as store compensation and occupancy costs, selling and administrative expenses as well as an adjustment for Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, which is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA

(1)Effective for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, the Company updated its segment reporting structure as described above. Prior periods have been recast to conform to the Company’s new reportable operating segments and current allocation methodology. There was no impact to the Company’s consolidated results.

(2)The significant expense categories and amounts align with the segment-level information that is regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker.

(3)Other segment items for each reportable segment include:

•Retail – other operating costs such as store compensation and occupancy costs, selling and administrative expenses as well as an adjustment for Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, which is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA

(1)Effective for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, the Company updated its segment reporting structure as described above. Prior periods have been recast to conform to the Company’s new reportable operating segments and current allocation methodology. There was no impact to the Company’s consolidated results.

(2)The significant expense categories and amounts align with the segment-level information that is regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker.

(3)Other segment items for each reportable segment include:

•Retail – other operating costs such as store compensation and occupancy costs, selling and administrative expenses as well as an adjustment for Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, which is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA

NOTE 17—COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Guarantees and Contingent Liabilities

The Company has outstanding guarantees related to certain lease obligations of various retailers as of August 2, 2025. These guarantees were generally made to support the business growth of wholesale customers. The guarantees are generally for the entire terms of the leases, with remaining terms that range from less thanone year toeleven years, with a weighted average remaining term of approximately five years. For each guarantee issued, if the wholesale customer or other third-party defaults on a payment, the Company would be required to make payments under its guarantee. Generally, the guarantees are secured by indemnification agreements or personal guarantees. The Company reviews performance risk related to its guarantee obligations based on internal measures of credit performance. As of August 2, 2025, the maximum amount of undiscounted payments the Company would be required to make in the event of default of all guarantees was $10 million ($9 million on a discounted basis). Based on the indemnification agreements, personal guarantees and results of the reviews of performance risk, as of August 2, 2025, the Company has recorded a de minimis total estimated loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company is a party to a variety of contractual agreements under which it may be obligated to indemnify the other party for certain matters in the ordinary course of business, which indemnities may be secured by operation of law or otherwise. These agreements primarily relate to the Company’s commercial contracts, service agreements, contracts entered into for the purchase and sale of stock or assets, operating leases and other real estate contracts, financial agreements, agreements to provide services to the Company and agreements to indemnify officers, directors and employees in the performance of their work. While the Company’s aggregate indemnification obligations could result in a material liability, the Company is not aware of any matters that are expected to result in a material liability. The Company has recorded the de minimis fair value of these guarantees and contingent obligations, when applicable, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Other Contractual Commitments

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into supply contracts to purchase products for resale and service contracts for fixed asset and information technology systems. These contracts typically include either volume commitments or fixed expiration dates, termination provisions and other standard contractual considerations. As of August 2, 2025, the Company had approximately $436 million of non-cancelable future purchase obligations, most of which will be paid and utilized in the ordinary course within one year.

Legal Proceedings

The Company is one of dozens of companies that have been named in various lawsuits alleging that drug manufacturers, retailers and distributors contributed to the national opioid epidemic. Currently, UNFI, primarily through its subsidiary, Advantage Logistics, is named in approximately 40 suits pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio where thousands of cases have been consolidated as Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”). In accordance with the Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 10, 2013, between New Albertson’s Inc. (“New Albertson’s”) and the Company (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), the Company believes that New Albertson’s has an obligation to defend and indemnify UNFI in a majority of the cases. New Albertson’s originally agreed to do so under a reservation of rights, however, New Albertson’s is disputing its obligation to do so. In one of the MDL cases, MDL No. 2804 filed by The Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation, all defendants were ordered to Answer the Complaint, which UNFI did on July 26, 2019. To date, no discovery has been conducted against UNFI in any of the actions. On October 7, 2022, the MDL Court issued an order directing the Company and numerous other non-litigating defendants to submit by November 1, 2022, a list of opioid cases where the Company is named and opioid dispensing and distribution data. The Company produced the data in compliance with the order. On March 8, 2023, the Company received a subpoena from the Consumer Protection Division of the Maryland Attorney General’s Office seeking records related to the distribution and dispensing of opioids. On May 19, 2023, the Company provided an initial production in response to the subpoena and is waiting for further direction from the Maryland Attorney General on additional documents requested. At an April 24, 2024 status conference, the MDL Court directed that the plaintiffs and non-litigating defendants, which includes the Company, determine whether the cases will be dismissed, litigated or mediated. On June 3, 2025, the Company began the process of mediation. The Company believes these claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend this matter.

On January 21, 2021, various health plans filed a complaint in Minnesota state court against the Company, Albertson’s Companies, LLC (“Albertson’s”) and Safeway, Inc. alleging the defendants committed fraud by improperly reporting inflated prices for prescription drugs for members of health plans. The Plaintiffs assertsix causes of action against the defendants: common law fraud, fraudulent nondisclosure, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, violation of the Minnesota Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act and violation of the Minnesota Prevention of Consumer Fraud Act. The plaintiffs allege that between 2006 and 2016, Supervalu overcharged the health plans by not providing the health plans, as part of usual and customary prices, the benefit of discounts given to customers purchasing prescription medication who requested that Supervalu match competitor prices. Plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of damages. Similar to the above case, for the majority of the relevant period Supervalu and Albertson’s operated as a combined company. In March 2013, Supervalu divested Albertson’s and pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, Albertson’s is responsible for any claims regarding its pharmacies. On February 19, 2021, Albertson’s and Safeway removed the case to Minnesota Federal District Court, and on March 22, 2021, plaintiffs filed a motion to remand to state court. On February 26, 2021, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. The hearing on the remand motion and motions to dismiss occurred on May 20, 2021. On September 21, 2021, the Federal District Court remanded the case to Minnesota state court and did not rule on the motion to dismiss, which was refiled in state court. On February 1, 2022, the state court denied the motion to dismiss. On November 27, 2023, the court held a scheduling conference and thereafter entered a scheduling order setting various discovery and expert deadlines. The trial date is set for May 18, 2026. The Company believes these claims are without merit and is vigorously defending this matter.

UNFI is currently subject to a qui tam action alleging violations of the False Claims Act (“FCA”). In United States ex rel. Schutte and Yarberry v. Supervalu, New Albertson’s, Inc., et al, which is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois, the relators allege that defendants overcharged government healthcare programs by not providing the government, as a part of usual and customary prices, the benefit of discounts given to customers purchasing prescription medication who requested that defendants match competitor prices. The complaint was originally filed under seal and amended on November 30, 2015. The government previously investigated the relators’ allegations and declined to intervene. Violations of the FCA are subject to treble damages and penalties of up to a specified dollar amount per false claim. The relators elected to pursue the case on their own and have alleged FCA damages against Supervalu and New Albertson’s in excess of $100 million, not including trebling and statutory penalties. For the majority of the relevant period Supervalu and New Albertson’s operated as a combined company. In March 2013, Supervalu divested New Albertson’s (and related assets) pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement. Based on the claims that are currently pending and the Stock Purchase Agreement, Supervalu’s share of a potential award (at the currently claimed value by the relators) would be approximately $24 million, not including trebling and statutory penalties. Both sides moved for summary judgment. On August 5, 2019, the Court granted one of the relators’ summary judgment motions finding that the defendants’ lower matched prices are the usual and customary prices and that Medicare Part D and Medicaid were entitled to those prices. On July 2, 2020, the Court granted the defendants’ summary judgment motion and denied the relators’ motion, dismissing the case. On July 9, 2020, the relators filed a notice of appeal with the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. On August 12, 2021, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the District Court’s decision granting summary judgment in defendants’ favor. On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court reversed and vacated the lower court’s judgment and remanded the case to the Seventh Circuit for further proceedings. On July 27, 2023, the Seventh Circuit vacated the summary judgment order and remanded the case to the District Court. On August 22, 2023, the District Court set the trial date for April 29, 2024. On October 11, 2023, each of the Company and the relators filed a motion for summary judgment. On February 16, 2024, the defendants filed a motion to reconsider the Court’s August 5, 2019 partial grant of summary judgment to the relators and to continue the trial date. On February 27, 2024, the Court granted the defendants’ motion for a trial date continuance and vacated the April 29, 2024 trial date. On April 26, 2024, the Court denied the defendants’ motion to reconsider the partial grant of summary judgment. On May 20, 2024, the District Court heard oral argument on the pending motions for summary judgment and on September 30, 2024, the Court denied both parties’ motions for summary judgment on scienter and granted relators’ motion for summary judgment on materiality. On March 4, 2025, after a three-week jury trial, the jury found in favor of the Company determining that the Company has no liability. On April 1, 2025, the relators filed a motion asking the Court to alter or amend the judgment to enter judgment for relators on penalties and a new trial on damages. The Company filed its response in opposition to the motion on April 29, 2025.

The Company, J. Alexander Miller Douglas, John Howard and Chris Testa are named in a putative securities class action that was originally filed on March 29, 2023. In Dan Sills, et al. v. United Natural Foods, Inc., et al., pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the plaintiffs allege that defendants violated federal securities laws by making materially false and/or misleading statements and failing to disclose material facts about UNFI’s business, operations and prospects. The defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on December 21, 2023, and on September 13, 2024, the court issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part the motion. On October 28, 2024, the Company answered the complaint denying the allegations. On March 7, 2025, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification and the Company filed its response on June 13, 2025. A mediation has been scheduled for November 17, 2025. The Company intends to vigorously defend this matter.

The Company is named in a putative class action lawsuit that was filed on November 3, 2024. The case is captioned NYSM Organics LLC v. United Natural Foods, Inc., and is pending in the Rhode Island Superior Court. In the Amended Complaint, which was filed on December 30, 2024, the plaintiff alleges that the Company took prompt-pay discounts improperly. The Amended Complaint asserts claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, and violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act. In an order dated June 5, 2025, the Court dismissed the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act claim. The Company filed its answer to the Amended Complaint on June 16, 2025.

From time to time, the Company receives notice of claims or potential claims or becomes involved in litigation, alternative dispute resolution, such as arbitration, or other legal and regulatory proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its business, including investigations and claims regarding employment law, including wage and hour (including class actions); pension plans; labor union disputes, including unfair labor practices, such as claims for back-pay in the context of labor contract negotiations and other matters; supplier, customer and service provider contract terms and claims, including matters related to supplier or customer insolvency or general inability to pay obligations as they become due; product liability claims, including those where the supplier may be insolvent and customers or consumers are seeking recovery against the Company; real estate and environmental matters, including claims in connection with its ownership and lease of a substantial amount of real property, both retail and warehouse properties; and antitrust. Additionally, costs could result from claims from customers or suppliers related to the Cybersecurity Incident. Other than as described above, there are no pending material legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or to which its property is subject.

Predicting the outcomes of claims and litigation and estimating related costs and exposures involves substantial uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes, costs and exposures to vary materially from current expectations. Management regularly monitors the Company’s exposure to the loss contingencies associated with these matters and may from time to time change its predictions with respect to outcomes and estimates with respect to related costs and exposures. Management has made provisions where it believes the loss contingency is probable and can be reasonably estimated. As of August 2, 2025, no material accrued obligations, individually or in the aggregate, have been recorded for these legal proceedings.

Although management believes it has made appropriate assessments of potential and contingent loss in each of these cases based on current facts and circumstances, and application of prevailing legal principles, there can be no assurance that material differences in actual outcomes from management’s current assessments, costs and exposures relative to current predictions and estimates, or material changes in such predictions or estimates will not occur. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.