NORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP

Consolidated Balance Sheets(unaudited)

‎

Consolidated Statements of Income(unaudited)

(dollars in thousan ds, except per share data)

‎

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

‎

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

‎

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

‎

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (continued)

(1)Includes impact of PB Bankshares acquisition on January 5, 2026. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

‎

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Basis of Presentation

The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Norwood Financial Corp (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Wayne Bank (the “Bank”), and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, WCB Realty Corp., Norwood Investment Corp., and WTRO Properties, Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements and with instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all normal, recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the Company. The operating results for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2026, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2026 or any other future interim period.

2. Revenue Recognition

Under ASC Topic 606, management determined that the primary sources of revenue emanating from interest and dividend income on loans and investments along with noninterest revenue resulting from investment security gains, loan servicing, gains on the sale of loans sold and earnings on bank-owned life insurance are not within the scope of this Topic.

The following presents noninterest income, segregated by revenue streams in-scope and out-of-scope of Topic 606, for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30:

3. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share represents income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options and restricted stock, and are determined using the treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the weighted average shares outstanding used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share.

For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2026, there were 76,350 stock options that were anti-dilutive and thereby excluded from the earnings per share calculations based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock of $32.15 per share as of June 30, 2026.

For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2025, there were 189,350 stock options that were anti-dilutive and thereby excluded from the earnings per share calculations based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock of $25.78 per share as of June 30, 2025.

4. Stock-Based Compensation

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2026, no stock options were granted. As of June 30, 2026, there was $147,420 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted in 2025 under the 2024 Equity Incentive Plan, which will be fully realized by December 31, 2026. Compensation costs related to stock options amounted to $148,000 and $124,000 during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

A summary ofthe Company’s stock option activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2026 is as follows:

Intrinsic value represents the amount by which the market price of the stock on the measurement date exceeded the exercise price of the option. The market price was $32.15 per share as of June 30, 2026 and $28.05 per share as of December 31, 2025.

A summary of the Company’s restricted stock activity for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 is as follows:

The expected future compensation expense relating to the 57,626 shares of non-vested restricted stock outstanding as of June 30, 2026 is $1,419,000. This cost will be recognized over the remaining vesting period of 4.50 years. Compensation costs related to restricted stock amounted to $271,000 and $233,000 during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

5. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss (in thousands) by component net of tax for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025:

(a)All amounts are net of tax. Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.

There wereno amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.

6. Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments and Guarantees

The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

A summary of the Bank’s financial instrument commitments is as follows:

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer and generally consists of real estate.

The Bank does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit. Standby letters of credit written are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Generally, all letters of credit, when issued, have expiration dates within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as those that are involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank, generally, holds collateral and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient to cover the potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding guarantees.

The allowance for credit loss on off-balance sheet commitments were $429,000 and $267,000, respectively, at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

7. Securities

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, and allowance for credit losses of securities available for sale were as follows:

The following tables summarize debt securities available for sale in a loss position for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded, aggregated by security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position (in thousands):

At June 30, 2026, the Company had 72 debt securities in an unrealized loss position in the less than twelve months category and 173 debt securities in the twelve months or more category. In Management’s opinion the unrealized losses reflect changes in interest rates subsequent to the acquisition of specific securities. The Company concluded that the decline in the value of these securities was not indicative of a credit loss. The Company didnot recognize any credit losses on these available for sale debt securities for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025. The Company does not have the intent to sell the securities, and it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the securities before recovery of its cost basis.

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities as of June 30, 2026 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

There wereno sales of securities available for sale for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.

Securities with a carrying value of $277,707,000 and $264,698,000 at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.

8. Loans Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses

Set forth below is selected data relating to the composition of the loan portfolio at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

Foreclosed assets acquired in settlement of loans are carried at fair value less estimated costs to sell and are included in foreclosed real estate owned on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, foreclosed real estate owned totaled $771,000 and $771,000, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, there were no additions to the foreclosed real estate category. As of June 30, 2026, the Company has initiated formal foreclosure proceedings onfour properties classified as consumer residential mortgages with an aggregate carrying value of $120,000.

Management uses an eight point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first four categories are considered not criticized, and are aggregated as “Pass” rated. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The Special Mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are potentially weak, resulting in an undue credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a Substandard classification. Loans in the Substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. All loans greater than 90 days past due are considered Substandard. Any portion of a loan that has been charged off is placed in the Loss category.

To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Bank has a structured loan rating process with several layers of internal and external oversight. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the Pass categories unless a specific action, such as nonperformance, repossession, or death occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event. The Company’s Loan Review Department is responsible for the timely and accurate risk rating of the loans on an ongoing basis. Every credit which must be approved by Loan Committee or the Board of Directors is assigned a risk rating at time of consideration. Loan Review, in conjunction with a third-party consultant, also annually reviews all criticized credits and relationships of $1,500,000 and over to re-affirm risk ratings.

Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the age of the portfolio as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing loans and nonaccrual loans as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 (in thousands):

Management reviews the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis using a defined, consistently applied process in order to make appropriate and timely adjustments to the allowance for credit losses. When information confirms all or part of specific loans to be uncollectible, these amounts are promptly charged off against the allowance.

The following table presents the allowance for credit losses by the classes of the loan portfolio:

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses related to loans totaling $3,356,000. The increase in provision was due primarily to an increase in the consumer portfolio provision of $1,174,000, an increase in the commercial real estate portfolio provision of $803,000, an increase in the residential real estate portfolio provision of $693,000, and an increase of $686,000 in all other portfolios, net. Factors impacting the provision include changes in the cumulative loss rates applied to the respective loan pools due to loss activity being added or subtracted with the passage of time, charge-offs and recoveries, and variances in Qualitative Factors and Economic Factors. In addition, the Company recorded a one-time adjustment of $4,263,000 as a result of the PB Bankshares acquisition.

The cumulative loss rate used as the basis for the estimate of credit losses is comprised of the Company’s historical loss experience. The Company chose to apply qualitative factors based on “quantitative metrics” which link the quantifiable metrics to historical changes in the qualitative factor categories. The Company also chose to apply economic projections to the model. A select group of economic indicators was utilized which was then correlated to the historical loss experience of the Company and its peers. Based on the correlation results, the economic adjustments are then weighted for relevancy and applied to the individual loan pools.

The following table presents the carrying value of loans on nonaccrual status and loans past due over 90 days still accruing interest (in thousands):

Based on the most recent analysis performed, the following table presents the recorded investment in non-homogenous pools by internal risk rating systems (in thousands):

‎

The Company monitors the credit risk profile by payment activity for residential and consumer loan classes. Loans past due over 90 days and loans on nonaccrual status are considered nonperforming. Nonperforming loans are reviewed monthly. The following table presents the carrying value of residential and consumer loans based on payment activity (in thousands):

Occasionally, the Bank modifies loans to borrowers in financial distress by providing principal forgiveness, term extension, and other-than-insignificant payment delay or interest rate reduction. When principal forgiveness is provided, the amount of forgiveness is charged-off against the allowance for credit losses.

In some cases, the Bank provides multiple types of concessions on one loan. Typically, one type of concession, such as a term extension, is granted initially. If the borrower continues to experience financial difficulty, another concession, such as principal forgiveness, may be granted. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, there were modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty consisting of 14 loan relationships. The following table presents modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty:

The following table provides the amortized cost basis of financing receivables that had a payment default during the period and were modified (in thousands):

The following table depicts the performance of loans that have been modified during the period for which a payment default has occurred (in thousands):

The Company’s primary business activity as of June 30, 2026 was with customers located in northeastern and southeastern Pennsylvania, and the New York counties of Delaware, Sullivan, Ontario, Otsego and Yates. Accordingly, the Company has extended credit primarily to commercial entities and individuals in this area whose ability to repay their loans is influenced by the region’s economy.

As of June 30, 2026, the Company considered its concentration of credit risk to be acceptable. The highest concentrations are in commercial rentals with $278.4 million of loans outstanding, or 12.3% of total loans outstanding, and hotels/motels with loans outstanding of $191.9 million, or 8.5% of loans outstanding. For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recognized charge offs of $10,000 on commercial rentals and $0 on hotels/motels. The following table presents additional details regarding the Company’s largest loan concentrations by industry as of June 30, 2026 (in thousands):

9. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. In accordance with fair value accounting guidance, the Company measures, records, and reports various types of assets and liabilities at fair value on either a recurring or non-recurring basis in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Those assets and liabilities are presented in the sections entitled “Assets and Liabilities Required to be Measured and Reported at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis” and “Assets and Liabilities Required to be Measured and Reported at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis”. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2 – Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The methods of determining the fair value of assets and liabilities presented in this note are consistent with our methodologies disclosed in Note 16 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.

Assets and Liabilities Required to be Measured and Reported at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 are as follows:

Securities:

The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) and held to maturity (carried at amortized cost) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices. For certain securities which are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence (Level 3). In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used. Management’s best estimate consists of both internal and external support on certain Level 3 investments. Internal cash flow models using a present value formula that includes assumptions market participants would use along with indicative exit pricing obtained from broker/dealers (where available) are used to support fair values of certain Level 3 investments, if applicable.

Interest Rate Swaps:

The fair value of interest rate swaps is based upon the present value of the expected future cash flows using the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) swap curve, the basis for the underlying interest rate. To price interest rate swaps, cash flows are first projected for each payment date using the fixed rate for the fixed side of the swap and the forward rates for the floating side of the swap. These swap cash flows are then discounted to time zero using SOFR zero-coupon interest rates. The sum of the present value of both legs is the fair market value of the interest rate swap. These valuations have been derived from our third party vendor’s proprietary models rather than actual market quotations. The proprietary models are based upon financial principles and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable.

Assets and Liabilities Required to be Measured and Reported at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 are as follows:

Individually analyzed loans held for investment:

The Company measures impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.

As of June 30, 2026, the fair value investment in individually analyzed loans totaled $29,175,000, which included 64 loan relationships with a carrying value of $26,592,000 that did not require a specific allowance for credit loss since either the estimated realizable value of the collateral or the discounted cash flows exceeded the recorded investment in the loan. As of June 30, 2026, the Company has recognized charge-offs against the allowance for credit losses on these individually analyzed loans in the amount of $40,000. As of June 30, 2026, the fair value investment in individually analyzed loans included 50 loan relationships with a carrying value of $3,259,000 that required a valuation allowance of $676,000 since the estimated realizable value of the collateral did not support the recorded investment in the loan. As of June 30, 2026, the Company has recognized charge-offs against the allowance for credit losses on these individually analyzed loans in the amount of $0 over the life of the loan.

As of December 31, 2025, the fair value investment in individually analyzed loans totaled $7,923,000, which included 51 loan relationships with a carrying value of $5,492,000 that did not require a specific allowance for credit loss since either the estimated realizable value of the collateral or the discounted cash flows exceeded the recorded investment in the loan. As of December 31, 2025, the Company has recognized charge-offs against the allowance for credit losses on these individually analyzed loans in the amount of $0 over the life of the loans. As of December 31, 2025, the fair value investment in individually analyzed loans included 40 loan relationships with a carrying value of $2,976,000 that required a valuation allowance of $293,000 since the estimated realizable value of the collateral did not support the recorded investment in the loan. As of December 31, 2025, the Company has recognized charge-offs against the allowance for credit losses on these individually analyzed loans in the amount of $0 over the life of the loan.

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:

(1)Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various Level 3 inputs which are not identifiable, less any associated allowance.

(2)Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted average of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percent of the appraisal.

Assets and Liabilities Not Required to be Measured or Reported at Fair Value

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

Loans receivable (carried at cost):

The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.

Mortgage servicing rights (carried at lower of cost or fair value)

The Company utilizes a third party provider to estimate the fair value of certain loan servicing rights. Fair value for the purpose of this measurement is defined as the amount at which the asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation.

Deposit liabilities (carried at cost):

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking, passbook savings and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Other borrowings (carried at cost):

Fair values of FHLB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new FHLB advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity. These prices obtained from this active market represent a fair value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.

The estimated fair values of the Bank’s financial instruments not required to be measured or reported at fair value were as follows at June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. ($ in thousands)

(1)This financial instrument is carried at cost, which approximates the fair value of the instrument.

10. Interest Rate Swaps

The Company enters into interest rate swaps that allow our commercial loan customers to effectively convert a variable-rate commercial loan agreement to a fixed-rate commercial loan agreement. Under these agreements, the Company enters into a variable-rate loan agreement with a customer in addition to an interest rate swap agreement, which serves to effectively swap the customer’s variable-rate into a fixed-rate. The Company then enters into a corresponding swap agreement with a third party in order to economically hedge itsexposure through the customer agreement. The interest rate swaps with both the customers and third parties are not designated as hedges under FASB ASC 815 and are not marked to market through earnings. As the interest rate swaps are structured to offset each other, changes to the underlying benchmark interest rates considered in the valuation of these instruments do not result in an impact to earnings; however, there may be fair value adjustments related to credit quality variations between counterparties, which may impact earnings as required by FASB ASC 820. There wasno effect on earnings in any periods presented. At June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, based upon the swap contract values, the Company pledged cash in the amount of $350,000 as collateral for its interest rate swaps with a third-party financial institution. The fair value of the swaps as of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 was $803,000 and $771,000, respectively.

Summary information regarding these derivatives is presented below

The following table presents the fair values of derivative instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

11. New and Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures. This ASU requires disclosure in the notes to financial statements of specified information about certain costs and expenses. Specific disclosures are required for (a) purchases of inventory, (b) employee compensation, (c) depreciation, (d) intangible asset amortization, and (e) depreciation, depletion, and amortization recognized as part of oil and gas producing activities. The amendments in this update do not change or remove current expense disclosure requirements. However, the amendments affect where this information appears in the notes to financial statements because entities are required to include certain current disclosures in the same tabular format disclosure as the other disaggregation requirements in the amendments. The amendments in ASU 2024-03 apply only to public business entities and are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its financial statements.

In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), which revises the effective date of ASU 2024-03 (on disclosures about disaggregation of income statement expenses) “to clarify that all public business entities are required to adopt the guidance in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027.” Entities within the ASU’s scope are permitted to early adopt the ASU. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its financial statements.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, which modernizes the accounting for internal-use software that is developed using an incremental and iterative method (e.g., agile method). The guidance removes all references to project stages in ASC 350-40 and clarifies the threshold entities apply to begin capitalizing costs. The guidance specifies that the property, plant, and equipment disclosure requirements under ASC 360-10 apply to capitalized software costs accounted for under ASC 350-40, regardless of how those costs are presented in the financial statements. The guidance, which applies to all entities, is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities may apply the guidance using a prospective, retrospective, or modified transition approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its financial statements.

In 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-07, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Derivatives Scope Refinements and Scope Clarification for Share-Based Noncash Consideration from a Customer in a Revenue Contract, which (1) refines the scope of the guidance on derivatives in ASC 815 (Issue 1) and (2) clarifies the guidance on share-based payments from a customer in ASC 606 (Issue 2). The ASU is intended to address concerns about the application of derivative accounting to contracts that have features based on the operations or activities of one of the parties to the contract and to reduce diversity in the accounting for share-based payments in revenue contracts. The ASU adds a new scope exception for certain contracts that are not traded on an exchange and have an underlying that is based on operations or activities specific to one of the parties to the contract. This ASU clarifies that when an entity has a right to receive a share-based payment from its customer in exchange for the transfer of goods or services, the share-based payment should be accounted for as noncash consideration within the scope of ASC 606. ASU 2025-07 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its financial statements.

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-08, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), which amends the guidance in Topic 326 to expand the population of acquired financial assets subject to the gross-up approach to include loans (excluding credit cards) that are acquired without credit deterioration and deemed “seasoned.” All non-purchased credit deteriorated loans (excluding credit cards) that are acquired in a business combination are deemed seasoned. Other non-purchased credit deteriorated loans (excluding credit cards) are considered to be seasoned if they were purchased at least 90 days after origination and the acquirer was not involved in the origination of the loans. ASU 2025-08 should be applied prospectively and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company early adopted ASU 2025-08.

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), which amends certain aspects of the hedge accounting guidance in ASC 815 to more closely align hedge accounting with the economics of an entity’s risk management activities. The amendments, among other things, provide more flexibility for cash flow hedges and hedging of raw materials and other nonfinancial assets, as well as simplify hedge accounting for flexible debt and foreign currency debt. ASU 2025-09 should be applied prospectively for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. For all other entities, the ASU is to be applied prospectively and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its financial statements.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements, to clarify interim disclosure requirements, the form and content of interim financial statements, and when ASC Topic 270 applies. The amendments in the ASU provide a list of specific interim disclosures that are required by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), which, together with the disclosure principle, represent the complete population of required disclosures in interim reporting periods. The intent of the disclosure principle is to help entities determine whether any disclosures not specified in Topic 270 should be provided in interim reporting periods. ASU 2025-11 may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements for public business entities for interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and all other entities in interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2028. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its financial statements.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-12, Codification Improvements, to address 33 issues that amend the Codification to (1) clarify, (2) correct errors, or (3) make minor improvements that affect a wide variety of Topics in the Codification and apply to all reporting entities within the scope of the affected accounting guidance. The amendments make the Codification easier to understand and apply. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after

December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its financial statements.

12. Segment Reporting

ASC Topic 280 – Segment Reporting identifies operating segments as components of an enterprise which are evaluated regularly by the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker, our Chief Executive Officer, in deciding how to develop strategy, allocate resources and assess performance.

The Company acts as an independent community financial services provider and offers traditional banking related financial services to individual, business and government customers. Through its Community Office and automated teller machine network, the Company offers a full array of commercial and retail financial services, including the taking of time, savings and demand deposits; the making of commercial, consumer and mortgage loans; and the providing of safe deposit services. The Company also performs personal, corporate, pension and fiduciary services through its Trust Department.

Operating segments are aggregated intoone segment, as operating results for all segments are similar. Accordingly, all the financial service operations are considered by management to be aggregated inone reportable operating segment, Community Banking.

The Chief Operating Decision Maker assesses performance and decides how to allocate resources based on net income that also is reported on the income statement as consolidated net income. Net income is used to monitor budget versus actual results.

The Chief Operating Decision Maker uses revenue streams and significant expenses to assess performance and evaluate return on assets and return on equity. The chief operating decision maker uses consolidated net income to benchmark the Company against its competitors. The benchmarking analysis and budget to actual results are used in assessing performance and in establishing compensation.

The accounting policies for the Community Banking segment are the same as those of our consolidated entity, which are described in Note 2 in the Annual Report filed on Form 10-K. Information utilized in the performance assessment by the Chief Operating Decision Maker is consistent with the level of aggregation disclosed in the Consolidated Statement of Income. The measure of segment assets is reported on the balance sheet as total consolidated assets.

13. Acquisition of PB Bankshares, Inc. and Presence Bank

On January 5, 2026, the Company and the Bank completed its previously announced acquisition of PB Bankshares, Inc. ("PB Bankshares") and its subsidiary bank, Presence Bank, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") dated as of July 7, 2025. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, PB Bankshares merged with and into the Company, with the Company as the surviving entity (“Merger”), and immediately following the Merger, Presence Bank merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank as the surviving bank.

Presence Bank conducted its business from offices and two loan production offices in Chester, Lancaster and Dauphin Counties, Pennsylvania. Presence Bank’s primary market area for deposits includes the communities in which it maintains banking offices, while its primary lending market area is broader and includes customers in Lebanon and Cumberland Counties in Pennsylvania.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement,80% of PB Bankshares’ common stock were converted into Company common stock while the remaining 20% were exchanged for cash. PB Bankshares’ stockholders had the option to elect to receive either 0.7850 shares of Company common stock or $19.75 in cash for each common share of PB Bankshares they own. The election was subject to proration to ensure that, in the aggregate,80% of the transaction consideration was paid in the form of Company common stock. In accordance with the Merger Agreement, the Presence Bank ESOP was terminated shortly after the closing date and of the transaction (the “ESOP Termination Date”) and the Company paid off the ESOP loan via the return of common stock issued and recorded as treasury shares.

In addition, per the Merger Agreement, each option to acquire shares of PB Common Stock that was outstanding and unexercised became vested and was converted into the right to receive from Norwood Financial a cash payment equal to the product of (i) the number of shares of PB Bankshares Common Stock subject to the PB Bankshares Stock Option, multiplied by (ii) the amount by which the Cash Consideration (the “Option Payment Amount”) exceeds the exercise price of such PB Bankshares Stock Option. To follow is a summary of the purchase price for the merger which totaled $60.0 million.

The following table summarizes the purchase of PB Bankshares, Inc. as of January 5, 2026:

Pursuant to accounting standards, the Company assigned a fair value to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of PB Bankshares. ASC 820 defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” The assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of PB Bankshares were recorded at their estimated fair values based on management’s best estimates using information available at the date of the acquisition and are subject to adjustment for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition. While the fair values are not expected to be materially different from the estimates, any material adjustments to the estimates will be reflected, retroactively, as of the date of the acquisition. The items most susceptible to adjustment are the fair value adjustments on loans, core deposit intangible and the deferred income tax assets resulting from the acquisition. The Company is continuing to finalize the fair values of all aspects of the acquisition.

Goodwill represents consideration transferred in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired. The goodwill resulting from the acquisition represents the value expected from the expansion of the Company's market and enhancement of operations and efficiencies. Goodwill acquired in the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.

The following tables provides a summary of the consideration transferred and the fair value of the assets acquired, and liabilities assumed as of the date of the Merger, and as a result of the Merger, the Corporation recorded goodwill totaling $7.1 million at January 5, 2026.

Investment securities available-for-sale

All acquired investments were classified as available for sale. The estimated fair value of available for sale securities we calculated using Level 2 inputs, The securities acquired are bought and sold in active markets.

Loans

The acquired loan portfolio was valued utilizing Level 3 inputs and included the use of a discounted cash flow methodology applied on a pooled basis for accruing loan and on individual basis for non-accruing loans and incorporated assumption that a market participant would employ. In the fair value process the Company developed assumptions as to credit risk, expected lifetime losses, qualitative credit factors, collateral values, discount rates, expected payments and expected prepayments.

Acquired loans are classified into two categories: Purchased Seasoned Loans (PSLs) and Purchased Credit Deteriorated loans (PCDs). PCD loans are defined as a loan or group of loans that have experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination, and the remaining loans were considered PSLs. Effective January 1, 2025, the Company early adopted ASU 2025-08 (Topic 326) on a prospective basis. In accordance with ASU 2025-08 an allowance for credit loss was determined using the same methodology as other loans held for investment and an initial allowance for credit losses for all acquired loans totaled $4.3 million. There wasno provision for credit losses expense recognized because the initial allowance is established by grossing-up the amortized cost of the acquired loans. The remaining difference between the net of the amortized cost basis and the allowance for credit losses and the fair value allocated to the loans on the date of acquisition is recognized as a non-credit-related discount that will be accreted into interest income of the life of the loans.

At the date of the Merger,91.4 % of the acquired loans from Presence Bank were PSL loans and 8.6% were PCD loans. The following table provides details related to the fair value of PCD loans.

Leased Facilities

The fair value adjustment for leased facilities contracts was based on a discounted cash flow methodology of the contract lease obligations versus observed comparable market rents and discounted based upon interest rates for similar term borrowings rates. The facilities fair value adjustment will be amortized into expense over the contractual life of the leased facility.

Premises

The fair value estimate is based upon appraised values. The owned facilities fair value adjustment will be amortized into expense over the estimated life of the owned facility.

Core Deposit Intangible

The fair value of the core deposit intangible was determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis using a discount rate commensurate with market participants. To calculate cash flows, deposit account servicing costs (net of deposit fee income) and interest expense on deposits were compared to the higher cost of alternative funding sources available through national brokered CD offering rates and FHLB advance rates. The projected cash flows were developed using expected deposit attrition. The core deposit intangible will be amortized overten years using the sum-of-years digits method.

Time Deposits

The fair value adjustment for time deposits was based on a discounted cash flow methodology of the contract rates and contractual repayments of fixed maturity deposits using prevailing market interest rates for similar-term time deposits. The time deposit fair value adjustment will be amortized into income on a level yield amortization method over the contractual life of the deposits.

Borrowings

The fair value adjustment for borrowings was based on a discounted cash flow methodology of the contract rates and contractual repayments of borrowings using prevailing market interest rates for similar-term borrowings. The borrowings fair value adjustment will be amortized into income on a level yield amortization method over the contractual life of the borrowings.