PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC

Non-performing assets were comprised of three non-performing single-family loans and one multi-family loan at September 30, 2026, compared to three non-performing single-family loans and one multi-family loan at June 30, 2026. These non-performing loans, net of the ACL, were secured by collateral located in California and totaled $504,000 at September 30, 2026, down slightly from $505,000 at June 30, 2026. Non-performing loans as a percentage of LHFI at September 30, 2026 was 0.04 percent, unchanged from June 30, 2026. No interest accruals were made for non-performing loans. There were no accruing loans 90 days or more past due, and no real estate owned at either September 30, 2026 or June 30, 2026. For further analysis on non-performing loans, see the tables below and Note 5 of the Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Corporation’s non-performing assets, net of ACL, at the dates indicated:

The following table summarizes classified assets, which is comprised of classified loans, net of ACL and real estate owned, if any, at the dates indicated:

A decline in real estate values subsequent to the time of origination of the Corporation’s real estate secured loans could result in higher loan delinquency levels, foreclosures, provision for credit losses and net charge-offs. Real estate values and real estate markets are beyond the Corporation’s control and are generally affected by changes in national, regional or

local economic conditions and other factors. These factors include fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of loans to potential purchasers, changes in tax laws and other governmental statutes, regulations and policies and acts of nature, such as earthquakes, fires and national disasters particular to California where substantially all of the Corporation’s real estate collateral is located. If real estate values decline, the value of the real estate collateral securing the Corporation’s loans as set forth in the table could be significantly overstated. The Corporation’s ability to recover on defaulted loans by foreclosing and selling the real estate collateral would then be diminished and it would be more likely to suffer losses on defaulted loans. The Corporation generally does not update the loan-to-value ratio on its loans held for investment by obtaining new appraisals or broker price opinions (nor does the Corporation intend to do so in the future as a result of the costs and inefficiencies associated with completing the task) unless a specific loan has demonstrated deterioration in which case individually evaluated allowances are established, if required.