Interactive Strength, Inc.
For the period ended Jun 30, 2025. Filed Aug 14, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Jun 30, 2025 · Filed Aug 14, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows may be impacted by a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including those set forth in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the SEC, the occurrence of any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our actual results. Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company is supplementing the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K with the following risk factor.
Significant developments or changes in national laws or policies to protect or promote domestic interests and/or address foreign competition, including laws and policies in areas such as trade, manufacturing, government purchasing, healthcare, intellectual property, regulatory enforcement and investment/development, can adversely affect our business and financial statements. The U.S. has announced and/or implemented significant new tariffs on imports from a wide range of countries, which has prompted retaliatory tariffs by a number of countries and a cycle of retaliatory tariffs by both the U.S. and other countries. In early April 2025, actions were taken by the U.S. and certain other countries to delay the effective date of certain of these tariffs, but as of the date of this report a number of new tariffs remain in effect, including significant tariffs between the U.S. and China. Collectively, these tariffs increase the cost to us of finished goods we import, which can increase the cost to our customers of certain of our finished goods, which can adversely impact demand for our products and our competitive positioning; could adversely impact the availability to us of certain products in certain countries and disrupt our supply chains, with related impacts to our operations; and could exacerbate inflation, diminish investment and result in broader negative impacts, economic instability and capital markets dislocation that may adversely impact demand for our products. In addition, whenever we are unable to fully recover higher costs, or whenever there is a time delay between the increase in costs and our ability to recover these costs, our margins and profitability can decline. The U.S. may implement additional tariffs and other measures, further retaliatory tariffs and other retaliatory actions may follow and the risks and adverse effects noted above may increase. Please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further discussion of the impact of these tariffs. The full impact of these tariffs and other actions on the Company and on our business partners remains highly uncertain and subject to rapid change.
All of the risks identified in this risk factor can adversely affect our business and financial statements.
Investing in and holding FET tokens involves significant risks, many of which are inherent to cryptocurrency and decentralized AI technologies.
Investing in and holding FET tokens involves significant risks, many of which are inherent to cryptocurrency and decentralized AI technologies, including the following:
Extreme Volatility and Price Fluctuations: The price of FET tokens is highly volatile and has experienced significant fluctuations in the past. This volatility is influenced by factors such as overall cryptocurrency market trends, regulatory developments, technological advancements within the AI and blockchain sectors, and specific developments within the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance ecosystem. There is no assurance that the value of FET tokens will increase, and their value could decline significantly or become worthless.
Regulatory Uncertainty: The regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies and digital assets, including utility tokens like FET, is still evolving and varies significantly across jurisdictions. New regulations or governmental actions in the United States or other countries could adversely affect the legality, market price, or liquidity of FET tokens, potentially leading to a prohibition on their use or ownership.
Competition and Market Adoption: The decentralized AI and blockchain sectors are highly competitive. The success and value of FET tokens depend on the widespread adoption and utilization of the Fetch.ai platform and its AI agents. Competition from other projects or technologies could limit the growth and utility of the FET ecosystem.
Technology Risks and Security Vulnerabilities: The Fetch.ai platform relies on complex blockchain and AI technologies, which may contain undiscovered bugs, vulnerabilities, or errors. Exploits of such vulnerabilities could lead to loss of FET tokens, disruption of the network, or other adverse effects. The underlying smart contracts and blockchain infrastructure are also subject to security risks, including hacking, cyberattacks, and consensus attacks.
Limited Liquidity and Market Manipulation: While FET tokens are traded on various exchanges, there may be periods of limited liquidity, making it difficult to buy or sell large quantities without significantly impacting the price. Furthermore, the cryptocurrency market is susceptible to manipulation, including "pump and dump" schemes and other illicit activities, which could artificially inflate or deflate the price of FET tokens.
Dependence on Key Personnel and Community Support: The development and ongoing success of the Artificial Superintelligence Alliance ecosystem are heavily reliant on its core development team, community engagement, and strategic partnerships. The departure of key personnel or a decline in community support could negatively impact the project's progress and the value of FET tokens.
Loss of Private Keys and Custody Risks: The security of FET tokens depends on the owner's ability to securely manage their private keys. If private keys are lost, stolen, or compromised, the FET tokens associated with those keys may be irrevocably lost. Custody arrangements, while designed to be secure, are not without risk, and any failure in our custody provider's systems could result in a loss of our FET holdings.
Uncertainty of Future Development and Utility: While Fetch.ai has outlined various use cases for FET, the actualization and broad adoption of these functionalities are subject to numerous uncertainties, including technological hurdles, market acceptance, and the ability to attract developers and users to the ecosystem. If the envisioned utility does not materialize as expected, the value of FET tokens could suffer.
Our treasury strategy exposes us to various risks associated with the digital asset market.
Our treasury strategy exposes us to various risks associated with the digital asset market, including the following:
Digital Asset Market Risk: Our treasury strategy is highly exposed to the inherent volatility and speculative nature of the digital asset market. The value of FET tokens, and by extension, our treasury, can fluctuate wildly and rapidly due to various factors, including market sentiment, technological developments, regulatory changes, macroeconomic conditions, and unexpected events. We may incur significant losses if the market price of FET tokens declines, which could materially and adversely impact our financial condition and operating results.
Concentration Risk in FET: Our treasury strategy currently involves significant concentration in a single digital asset, FET. While we believe in the long-term potential of Fetch.ai, this concentration amplifies the impact of any adverse developments specific to the FET token or the Fetch.ai ecosystem. A decline in the perceived value, utility, or adoption of FET could have a disproportionately negative effect on our treasury.
Custody Risk: Although we utilize a reputable institutional custodian, BitGo, there is always a risk that our digital assets could be lost, stolen, or become inaccessible due to a security breach, operational failure, or other unforeseen events at the custodian. While insurance may provide some coverage, it may not cover all potential losses.
Regulatory Scrutiny and Future Restrictions: Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide are increasingly scrutinizing digital asset activities. Our treasury strategy could be adversely affected by new laws, regulations, or interpretations that restrict or prohibit the holding, trading, or use of digital assets, including FET. Such regulatory changes could render our holdings illiquid or subject to significant restrictions, potentially impairing our ability to realize value from our investment.
Accounting and Tax Complexity: The accounting treatment and tax implications of holding digital assets as treasury reserves are complex and subject to evolving guidance. Changes in accounting standards or tax laws could require us to revalue our digital asset holdings or incur significant tax liabilities, which could adversely affect our financial statements and profitability.
Reputational Risk: Negative public perception or unforeseen events related to the broader cryptocurrency industry or specific to Fetch.ai could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business and stock price.
Our issuance of convertible debt exposes us to various risks on dilution of our existing stockholders, downward pressure on stock price, impact on future financing and investor confidence.
Our issuance of convertible debt exposes us to various risks, including the following:
Dilution Risk to Existing Shareholders: Our issuance of convertible debt, which may be converted into shares of our common stock, poses a significant risk of dilution to our existing shareholders. Upon conversion, new shares will be issued, increasing the total number of outstanding shares and potentially decreasing the voting power of current shareholders. The extent of dilution will depend on the conversion price and the amount of debt converted.
Downward Pressure on Stock Price: The potential for future dilution from the conversion of debt can create downward pressure on our stock price. Investors may anticipate the increased supply of shares, leading to a negative impact on market valuation.
Impact on Future Financing: The existence of convertible debt on our balance sheet, and the potential for future dilution, may make it more difficult or expensive for us to raise additional capital through equity or debt offerings in the future. Potential investors may be wary of the existing conversion rights or the perceived debt burden.
Market Perception and Investor Confidence: The market's perception of our financial health and growth prospects can be influenced by our capital structure, including the amount and terms of our convertible debt. Negative perceptions could impact investor confidence and our stock valuation.
On January 23, 2025, we issued 112,334 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in the aggregate as a dividend on the shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
On January 23, 2025, we issued 496,246 shares of Series C Preferred Stock pursuant to a Loan Restoration Agreement and issued 126,515 shares of Series C Preferred Stock as a dividend on the shares of Series C Preferred Stock.
On January 28, 2025, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with an accredited investor, pursuant to which we agreed to issue to the investor for approximately $2.9 million, (a) a senior secured convertible note issued by the Company in the aggregate principal amount of $3.3 million, which is convertible into shares of Common Stock, (b) warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 67,427 shares of Common Stock, (c) Class A incremental warrants to purchase senior secured convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $13.0 million and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 269,710 shares of Common Stock and (d) Class B incremental warrants to purchase senior secured convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $20.0 million and warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 414,938 shares of Common Stock. On March 11, 2025, the investor exercised Class A Incremental Warrants to purchase the Class A Incremental Notes for an aggregate principal amount of $4.0 million and, as a result, was issued the Class A Incremental Common Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 82,988 shares of Common Stock (20,747 shares for each of the four (4) warrants). The exercise price of the Class A Incremental Common Warrants was $30.60 per share. The gross proceeds to the Company from the Warrant Exercise were approximately $3.6 million, before deducting legal fees and other estimated expenses.
On February 4, 2025, the Company issued five new secured promissory notes in exchange for existing promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $5.4 million.
On March 4, 2025, we issued 47,175 shares of common stock in exchange for the reduction of a principal amount of a note by $1.2 million.
On March 3, 2025, a holder of shares of Series A Preferred Stock converted 100,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock into 6,390 shares of Common Stock.
From February 14, 2025 to March 12, 2025, a holder of Series C Preferred Stock converted 2,801,250 shares of Series C Preferred Stock into 172,385 shares of Common Stock.
On March 31, 2025 we issued 1,188,571 shares of Series C Preferred Stock pursuant to a Loan Restoration Agreement.
From April 1, 2025 to April 24, 2025, a holder of Series C Preferred Stock converted 729,366 shares of Series C Preferred Stock into 44,884 shares of Common Stock.
On June 6, 2025, a holder of shares of Series B Preferred Stock converted 31,107 shares of Series B Preferred Stock into 2 shares of Common Stock.
From April 23, 2025 to June 25, 2025, we issued 568,874 shares of common stock in exchange for the reduction of a principal amount of a note by $3.8 million.
The offers, sales and issuances of the securities described above were deemed to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 promulgated under Regulation D promulgated thereunder as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. The recipients of securities in each of these transactions acquired the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends were affixed to the securities issued in these transactions. Each of the recipients of securities in these transactions was an accredited investor or institutional accredited investor within the meaning of Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act and had adequate access, through employment, business or other relationships, to information about the Registrant. No underwriter was involved in these transactions.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.