Virginia National Bankshares Corp

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2025

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation: The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information. Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The statements should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Nature of Operations: The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, and its subsidiary Virginia National Bank, and for the first quarter of 2024 presentation, its former subsidiary Masonry Capital Management, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Effective April 1, 2024, the Company sold the membership interests in Masonry Capital to an officer of the Company. Subsequent to the date of sale, the Company will receive an annual revenue-share amount for a period ofsix years. The Bank offers a full range of banking and related financial services to meet the needs of individuals, businesses and charitable organizations, including the fiduciary services of VNB Trust and Estate Services. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Basis of Presentation: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and the reporting guidelines prescribed by regulatory authorities requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the ACL, goodwill and core deposit intangible assets and fair value measurements. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2025.

Reclassifications: If needed, certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. No such reclassifications were considered material.

Note 2. Recent Significant Accounting Pronouncements

Expense Disaggregation Disclosures - In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses.” ASU 2024-03 requires public companies to disclose, in the notes to the financial statements, specific information about certain costs and expenses at each interim and annual reporting period. This includes disclosing amounts related to employee compensation, depreciation, and intangible asset amortization. In addition, public companies will need to provide qualitative description of the amounts remaining in relevant expense captions that are not separately disaggregated quantitatively. The FASB subsequently issued ASU 2025-01, “Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Clarifying the Effective Date”, which amends the effective date of ASU 2024-03 to clarify that all public business entities are required to adopt the guidance in ASU 2024-03 in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption of ASU 2024-03 is permitted. Implementation of ASU 2024-03 may be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2024-03 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

SEC Related Disclosure Improvements -In October 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-06, “Disclosure Improvements: Codification Amendments in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative.” This ASU incorporates certain SEC disclosure requirements into the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments in the ASU are expected to clarify or improve disclosure and presentation requirements of a variety of Codification Topics, allow users to more easily compare entities subject to the SEC’s existing disclosures with those entities that were not previously subject to the requirements, and align the requirements in the Codification with the SEC’s regulations. For entities subject to the SEC’s existing disclosure requirements and for entities required to file or furnish financial statements with or to the SEC in preparation for the sale of or for purposes of issuing securities that are not subject to contractual restrictions on transfer, the effective date for each amendment will be the date on which the SEC removes that related disclosure from its rules. For all other entities, the amendments will be effective two years later. However, if by June 30, 2027, the SEC has not removed the related disclosure from its regulations, the amendments will be removed from the Codification and not become effective for any entity. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2023-06 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Refer to Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the Company's significant accounting policies. Other accounting standards that have been issued by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not currently expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 3. Securities

The amortized cost and fair values of securities available for sale as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

As of June 30, 2025, there were$250.8 million or 265 issues of individual securities, held in an unrealized loss position. These securities have an unrealized loss of$46.7 million and consist of 115 mortgage-backed/collateralized mortgage obligations,124 municipal bonds,19 agency bonds, and 7 corporate bonds.

Accrued interest receivable on AFS securities as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 amounted to $1.4 and $1.5 million, respectively.

The following tables summarize all securities with unrealized losses, segregated by length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position, for whichno allowance for credit losses was recorded, at June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands):

The Company’s securities portfolio is primarily made up of fixed rate instruments, the prices of which move inversely with interest rates. Any unrealized losses are considered by management to be driven by increases in market interest rates over the yields available at the time the underlying securities were purchased. The fair value is expected to recover as the instruments approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such investments decline. At the end of any accounting period, the portfolio may have both unrealized gains and losses.

Impairment of debt securities occurs when the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost. The Company has elected to exclude accrued interest receivable from the amortized cost basis. For debt securities AFS, impairment is recognized in its entirety in net income if either, (i) we intend to sell the security; or, (ii) it is more-likely-than-not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If, however, the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery, the Company evaluates unrealized losses to determine whether a decline in fair value below amortized cost basis is a result of a credit loss, which occurs when the amortized cost basis of the security exceeds the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the security, or other factors such as changes in market interest rates. If a credit loss exists, an ACL is recorded that reflects the amount of the impairment related to credit losses, limited by the amount by which the security’s amortized cost basis exceeds its fair value. Changes in the ACL are recorded in net income in the period of change and are included in the provision for credit losses. Changes in the fair value of debt securities AFS not resulting from credit losses are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The Company regularly reviews unrealized losses in its investments in securities and cash flows expected to be collected from impaired securities based on criteria including the extent to which market value is below amortized cost, the financial health of and specific prospects for the issuer, the Company’s intention with regard to holding the security to maturity and the likelihood that the Company would be required to sell the security before recovery.

Management does not believe any of the securities in an unrealized loss position are impaired due to credit quality. In addition, issuers have continued to make timely payments of principal and interest. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2025, management believes the impairments detailed in the table above are temporary, and no credit loss has been realized in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. Additionally, management has the ability to hold any security with an unrealized loss until maturity or until such time as the value of the security has recovered from its unrealized loss position.

Securities pledged as collateral to secure public deposits and to facilitate borrowing from the FRB had carrying values of $22.7 million and $21.9 million at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.

There wereno sales of AFS securities during thesix months ended June 30, 2025. During the six months ended June 30, 2024, the Company sold AFS securities with a total book value of $39.6 million, incurring a pre-tax loss of $4 thousand. These sales were executed as the result of a strategic decision to reinvest proceeds into higher yielding assets.

Restricted securities are securities with limited marketability and consist of stock in the FRB, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, CBB Financial Corporation (the holding company for Community Bankers' Bank) and an investment in an SBA loan fund. These restricted securities, totaling$8.1 million and$6.2 million as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, are carried at cost.

The amortized cost and fair value of AFS debt securities at June 30, 2025 are presented below based upon contractual maturities, by major investment categories (dollars in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations.

Note 4. Loans

The composition of the loan portfolio by major loan classifications at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, stated at their face amount, net of deferred fees and costs and discounts, including fair value marks, appears below (dollars in thousands). The Company has elected to exclude accrued interest receivable, totaling $4.8 million and $4.9 million as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, from the amortized cost basis of loans.

The balances in the table above include unamortized premiums and net deferred loan costs and fees. As of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, unamortized premiums from purchases of loans (excluding loans acquired during the Merger) were$10.8 million, and $10.3 million, respectively, due primarily to purchases of government-guaranteed loans. Net deferred loan costs and fees totaled$3.0 million as of June 30, 2025 and $3.1 million as of December 31, 2024, respectively.

Consumer loans include $60 thousand and $36 thousand of demand deposit overdrafts as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.

Loans acquired in business combinations are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value at the acquisition date under the acquisition method of accounting. The fair value mark as of the Effective Date was $23.1 million. The table above includes a remaining net fair value mark of$5.7 million as of June 30, 2025 on the Acquired Loans.

The following table shows the aging of the Company's loan portfolio, by class, at June 30, 2025 (dollars in thousands):

The following table shows the aging of the Company's loan portfolio, by class, at December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands):

The following table shows the Company's amortized cost basis of loans on nonaccrual status as of June 30, 2025 (dollars in thousands). All nonaccrual loans are evaluated for an ACL on an individual basis. As of June 30, 2025, onlyone nonaccrual loan required an ACL, in the amount of $4 thousand, due to collateral value shortfall, and as of December 31, 2024, onlyone nonaccrual loan required an ACL, in the amount of $28 thousand, also due to collateral value shortfall.

The following table shows the Company's amortized cost basis of loans on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands).

Troubled loan modifications

From time to time, the Company modifies loans to borrowers who are experiencing financial difficulties by providing term extensions, interest rate reductions or other-than-insignificant payment delays. As the effect of most modifications is already included in the ACL due to the measurement methodologies used in its estimate, the ACL is typically not adjusted upon modification. During the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 and the six months ended June 30, 2025, no loans were modified to borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulty. During the first quarter of 2024, one 1-4 family residential mortgage loan was modified for a borrower experiencing financial difficulties, in the amount of $703 thousand and representing 0.002% of this loan segment, by extending the interest-only term and maintaining the original interest rate.

The Company closely monitors the performance of all modified loans to understand the effectiveness of its modification efforts. Upon determination, if applicable, that all or a portion of a modified loan is uncollectible, that amount is charged against the ACL. One loan that has been modified by the Bank is in payment default as of June 30, 2025 as the loan is greater than 90 days past due.

Note 5. Allowance for Credit Losses

The ACL on the loan portfolio is a material estimate for the Company. The Company estimates is ACL on its loan portfolio on a quarterly basis. The Company utilizes two methodologies in its development of the ACL, discounted cash flow and remaining life.

•

Discounted Cash Flow

o

DCF models, being periodic in nature, allow for effective incorporation of a reasonable and supportable forecast in a directionally consistent and objective manner.

o

The analysis aligns well with other calculations/actions outside the ACL estimation, which will mitigate model risk in other areas and allow for symmetrical application. For example, fair value (exit price notion), profitability analysis, IRR calculations, ALM, stress testing, and other forms of cash flow analysis.

o

Peer data is available for certain inputs (Probability of Default, Loss Given Default) if first-party data is not available or meaningful. This is made possible by the periodic nature of the model.

o

The DCF methodology is utilized on the following pools: 1) Commercial & Industrial; 2) Construction; 3) Consumer; 4) CRE NonOwner Occupied; 5) CRE Owner Occupied; 6) HELOC & Junior Lien; 7) Residential 1st Lien; and 8) Multifamily.

•

Remaining Life

o

This methodology leverages a quarterly loss rate as well as future expectations of portfolio balances to calculate a reserve.

o

There are two main strengths of this methodology. First, it is fairly easy to execute and does not rely on large quantities of historical loan-level data. Second, it can satisfy the need to incorporate a reasonable and supportable forecast in a straightforward manner by either applying a forecast policy of “applicable history” or leveraging an actual econometric model for the analysis.

o

The remaining life methodology is utilized on the following pools: 1) Minute Lender; and 2) Student Loans.

Maximum Loss Rate - Management utilizes the same model to calculate maximum loss rates and expected loss rates for each segment. No additional models or methodologies were used to quantify the maximum loss rate, rather, a worst-case economic environment is utilized in the models. This process ensures symmetry between the maximum loss rate and the quantified loss rate. This process also leverages the well-documented regression models used in model development.

The process for deriving the maximum loss rate is outlined below:

•

The economic forecast reflects the worst economic environment observed for each economic factor. This is done by quantifying a rolling 1-year average for each economic factor. Then, the most pessimistic 1-year average observations are captured and utilized as economic forecast inputs within the application.

•

The economic forecast assumed is a ‘worst-case’ economic environment with inputs reflective of the great recession.

•

The economic forecast is used to quantify credit risk in the form of Loss Rate. The resulting periodic default and loss rates are applied to the prepayment adjusted amortization schedules for each segment.

•

The resulting ACL, which represents a lifetime reserve (symmetrical to the base model), is input into the qualitative framework’s maximum loss rate field. The difference between the expected model and the maximum model results are then allocated based on weight and risk assignment.

Qualitative Factors - ASC 326 requires an entity to adjust historical loss information to reflect the extent to which management expects reasonable and supportable forecasts to differ from the conditions that existed for the period over which historical information was evaluated. The adjustments for reasonable and supportable forecasts may be qualitative in nature and should reflect changes related to relevant data.

The Company utilizes a scorecard approach to assign qualitative factors. The scorecard approach is in alignment with the AICPA audit considerations for CECL which states:

These adjustments should be grounded in a methodology that is subject to appropriate governance, challenge, and periodic controlled reevaluation. Such methodology will generally require significant management judgment. The information used to support management’s adjustments may be publicly available information, information specifically developed for the entity via management’s specialist (internal or external), or other relevant and reliable information.

The purpose of the qualitative scorecard is to provide a qualitative estimate of the expected credit losses of the current loan portfolio in response to potential limitations of the quantitative model. It is used to aid in the assessment of the unquantifiable factors affecting expected credit losses in the loan portfolio. Benefits of the scorecard include directional consistency, objectivity, controls and quantification framework (auditable).

For each segment, the scorecard calculates the difference between the quantitative expected credit loss and the maximum loss rate. This difference represents all available qualitative adjustment that can be applied to that segment.

Individual Evaluation - In accordance with ASC 326, the Company will evaluate individual loans for expected credit losses when those loans do not share similar risk characteristics with loans evaluated using a collective (pooled) basis. Loans will not be included in both collective and individual analysis. Individual analysis will establish a specific reserve for each loan, using one of four methods: 1) Fair Value of Collateral Method (Collateral Relationship); 2) Cash Flow Method; 3) Advanced Cash Flow Method; or 4) Loan Pricing Method.

Management has elected to perform an individual evaluation on all loans in nonaccrual status. As of June 30, 2025, after reviewing each loan in nonaccrual status, a specific reserve of $4 thousand was established. As of December 31, 2024, a specific reserve of $28 thousand was established.

The primary driver in the change in reserves from December 31, 2024 to June 30, 2025 was the decline in the balances and the loss rates associated with student loans. The ACL associated with student loans declined from $650 thousand to $527 thousand period over period, due to declining balances within the portfolio and improvement in loss rate from 4.03% as of December 31, 2024 to 3.64% as of June 30, 2025.

The following table shows the ACL activity by loan portfolio for thesix months ended June 30, 2025 (dollars in thousands):

The following table shows the ACL activity by loan portfolio at December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands):

The following table presents a breakdown of the provision for (recovery of) credit losses for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

The following table presents the Company's amortized cost basis of collateral dependent loans, which are individually evaluated to determine expected credit losses, and the related ACL allocated to those loans as of the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company utilizes the following credit quality indicators:

Pass

Loans with the following risk ratings are pooled by class and considered together as “Pass”:

Excellent – minimal risk loans secured by cash or fully guaranteed by a U.S. government agency

Good – low risk loans secured by marketable collateral within margin

Satisfactory – modest risk loans where the borrower has strong and liquid financial statements and more than adequate cash flow

Average – average risk loans where the borrower has reasonable debt service capacity

Marginal – acceptable risk loans where the borrower has acceptable financial statements but is leveraged

Watch

These loans have an acceptable risk but require more attention than normal servicing.

Special Mention

These potential problem loans are currently protected but are potentially weak.

Substandard

These problem loans are inadequately protected by the sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower and/or the value of any collateral pledged. If such loans are not accruing interest, they would be evaluated on an individual basis.

Doubtful

Loans with this rating have significant deterioration in the sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower and/or the value of any collateral pledged, making collection or liquidation of the loan in full highly questionable. These loans would be considered impaired and evaluated on an individual basis.

The following table presents the Company's recorded investment in loans by credit quality indicators by year of origination as of June 30, 2025 (dollars in thousands). Current period gross write-off amounts represent write-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2025 (dollars in thousands):

The following table presents the Company's recorded investment in loans by credit quality indicators by year of origination as of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands). Current period gross write-off amounts represent write-offs for the year ended December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands):

Note 6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The carrying amount of goodwill was$7.8 million at June 30, 2025, December 31, 2024 and June 30, 2024, resulting from the Merger.

The Company had$3.2 million,$3.8 million and$4.4 million of other intangible assets as of June 30, 2025, December 31, 2024 and June 30, 2024, respectively. Other intangible assets were recognized in connection with the core deposits acquired from Fauquier in 2021. The following table summarizes the gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets (dollars in thousands):

Amortization expense was$284 thousand and$332 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and$579 thousand and $675 thousand for thesix months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Estimated future amortization expense as of June 30, 2025 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Note 7. Leases

Lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments and are presented at each reporting date as the net present value of the remaining contractual cash flows. Cash flows are discounted at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate in effect at the commencement date of the lease for a term similar to the length of the lease, including any probable renewal options available. Right-of-use assets represent the Company’s right to use the underlying asset for the lease term and are calculated as the sum of the lease liability and if applicable, prepaid rent, initial direct costs and any incentives received from the lessor.

Lease payments for short-term leases are recognized as lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Payments for leases with terms longer than twelve months are included in the determination of the lease liability.

Each of the Company’s long-term lease agreements is classified as an operating lease. Certain of these leases offer theoption to extend the lease term and the Company has included such extensions in its calculation of the lease liabilities to the extent the options are reasonably assured of being exercised. The lease agreements do not provide for residual value guarantees and have no restrictions or covenants that would impact dividends or require incurring additional financial obligations.

The following tables present information about the Company’s leases (dollars in thousands):

A maturity analysis of operating lease liabilities and reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to the total of operating lease liabilities is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Note 8. Net Income Per Share

The table below shows the weighted average number of shares used in computing net income per common share and the effect of the weighted average number of shares of potential dilutive common stock for thethree and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024. Diluted net income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock equivalents outstanding, to the extent dilutive. The Company’s common stock equivalents relate to outstanding common stock options. The recipients of unvested restricted shares have full voting and dividend rights, and as such, unvested restricted stock as of June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024 is included in the calculation of basic and diluted net income per share (dollars below reported in thousands except per share data).

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, there were 101,864 and 119,464 option shares, respectively, considered anti-dilutive and excluded from this calculation. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, there were 149,001 option shares considered anti-dilutive and excluded from this calculation.

Note 9. Stock Incentive Plans

At the Annual Shareholders Meeting on June 23, 2022, shareholders approved the Virginia National Bankshares Corporation 2022 Stock Incentive Plan. The 2022 Plan made available up to 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued to plan participants. The 2022 Plan provides for granting of both incentive and nonqualified stock options, as well as restricted stock, unrestricted stock and other stock based awards. No new grants can be issued under the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan or the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan as those plans have expired. At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on July 24, 2025, an amendment to the 2022 Plan to increase the shares available for issuance under the plan by 150,000 shares was approved.

For the 2022 Plan, the option price for any stock options cannot be less than the fair value of the Company’s stock on the grant date. In addition,95% of the common stock authorized for issuance must have a vesting or exercise schedule of at least one year. Forthe 2014 Plan and the 2005 Plan, the option price of incentive stock options cannot be less than the fair value of the stock at the time an option is granted and nonqualified stock options may be granted at prices established by the Board of Directors, including prices less than the fair value on the date of grant. Outstanding stock options generally expireten years from the grant date. Stock options generally vest by the fourth or fifth anniversary of the date of the grant.

A summary of the shares issued and available under each of the Plans is shown below as of June 30, 2025. Share data and exercise price range per share have been adjusted to reflect prior issued stock dividends. Although the 2014 Plan and the 2005 Plan have expired andno new grants will be issued under those plans, there were options issued before the plans expired that are still outstanding as shown below.

The Company accounts for all of its stock incentive plans under recognition and measurement accounting principles which require that the compensation cost relating to stock-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. Stock-based compensation arrangements include stock options and restricted stock. All stock-based payments to employees are required to be valued at a fair value on the date of grant and expensed based on that fair value over the applicable vesting period.

Stock Options

Changes in the stock options outstanding related to the Plans are summarized below (dollars in thousands except per share data):

For both the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company recognized $35 thousand in compensation expense for stock options. For thesix months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company recognized $69 thousand and $59 thousand, respectively, in compensation expense for stock options. As of June 30, 2025, there was $378 thousand in unre cognized compensation expense remaining to be recognized in future reporting periods through 2030. The fair value of any stock option grant is estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes pricing model. There were stock options grants of 2,600 issued during thethree months ended June 30, 2025, and 32,900 issued in the second quarter of 2024. During thesix months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, there were stock option grants of 8,200 shares and 41,300 shares granted, respectively.

Summary information pertaining to options outstanding at June 30, 2025 is shown below. Share and per share data have been adjusted to reflect the prior stock dividends issued.

Stock Grants

Restricted stock grants –21,068 restricted shares were granted to employees and non-employee directors, vesting over afour-year period, during thesix months ended June 30, 2025. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, $212 thousand and $426 thousand, respectively, were expensed as a result of restricted stock grants. As of June 30, 2025, there was $2.1 million in unrecognized compensation expense for all restricted stock grants remaining to be recognized in future reporting periods through 2029.

Changes in the restricted stock grants outstanding during thesix months ended June 30, 2025 are summarized below (dollars in thousands except per share data):

Note 10. Fair Value Measurements

Determination of Fair Value

The Company follows ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. This codification clarifies that the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

Fair Value Hierarchy

In accordance with this guidance, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value:

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated financial statements:

Securities available for sale

Securities AFS are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that consider observable market data (Level 2).

The following tables present the balances measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands):

Certain financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write downs of individual assets. The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the consolidated financial statements:

Collateral Dependent Loans with an ACL

In accordance with ASC 326, we may determine that an individual loan exhibits unique risk characteristics which differentiate it from other loans within our loan pools. In such cases, the loans are evaluated for expected credit losses on an individual basis and excluded from the collective evaluation. Specific allocations of the ACL are determined by analyzing the borrower's ability to repay amounts owed, collateral deficiencies, the relative risk grade of the loan and economic conditions affecting the borrower's industry, among other things. A loan is considered to be collateral dependent when, based upon management's assessment, the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral. In such cases, expected credit losses are based on the fair value of the collateral at the measurement date, adjusted for estimated selling costs if satisfaction of the loan depends on the sale of the collateral. We reevaluate the fair value of collateral supporting collateral dependent loans on a quarterly basis. The fair value of real estate collateral supporting collateral dependent loans is evaluated by appraisal services using a methodology that is consistent with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice.

The following table presents the Company's assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024:

ASC 825, “Financial Instruments,” requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim periods and excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.

The Company uses the exit price notion in calculating the fair values of financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of its normal operations. Consequently, the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments will fluctuate when interest rate levels change, and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Company. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to minimize interest rate risk; however, borrowers with fixed rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising rate environment and more likely to prepay in a falling rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Company’s overall interest rate risk.

Note 11. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024 (dollars in thousands).

Note 12. Segment Reporting

For the financial periods noted in this report, the Company hasthree reportable segments. Each reportable segment is a strategic business unit that offers different products and services. They are managed separately, because each segment appeals to different markets and, accordingly, require different technology and marketing strategies. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies provided earlier in this report.

Thethree reportable segments are:

•

Bank -The commercial banking segment involves making loans and generating deposits from individuals, businesses and charitable organizations. Loan fee income, service charges from deposit accounts, and other non-interest-related fees, such as fees for debit cards and ATM usage and fees for treasury management services, generate additional income for the Bank segment.

•

VNB Trust & Estate Services –VNB Trust & Estate Services offers corporate trustee services, trust and estate administration, IRA administration and custody services. Revenue for this segment is generated from administration, service and custody fees, as well as management fees that are derived from Assets Under Management. Investment management services currently are offered through in-house and third-party managers.

•

Masonry Capital -Masonry Capital offers investment management services for separately managed accounts and a private investment fund employing a value-based, catalyst-driven investment strategy. Revenue for this segment is generated from management fees that are derived from Assets Under Management and incentive income that is based on the investment returns generated on performance-based Assets Under Management. Effective April 1, 2024, the Company sold the membership interests in Masonry Capital Management, LLC to an officer of the Company. Subsequent to the date of sale, the Company will receive an annual revenue-share amount for a period ofsix years. No expenses will be incurred by the Company related to Masonry Capital subsequent to the effective date of sale.

Segment information for thethree and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 is shown in the following tables (dollars in thousands). Note that asset information is not reported below, as the assets of VNB Trust & Estate Services are reported at the Bank level; also, assets specifically allocated to the lines of business other than the Bank are insignificant and are no longer provided to the chief operating decision maker.

Note 13. Sale of Masonry Capital Management, LLC

Effective April 1, 2024, the Company sold the membership interests in Masonry Capital Management, LLC to an officer of the Company. Subsequent to the date of sale, the Company will receive an annual revenue-share amount for a period ofsix years. No expenses will be incurred by the Company related to Masonry Capital subsequent to the effective date of sale. The sale of this business line did not meet the requirements for classification of discontinued operations, as the sale did not represent a strategic shift in the Company's operations or plans and will not have a major effect on the Company's future operations or financial results.

Note 14. Share Repurchase Plan

During the second quarter of 2023, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase plan of up to 5% of outstanding common stock. Repurchases may be made through open market purchases or in privately negotiated transactions. The actual timing, number, and value of shares repurchased under the plan will be determined by a committee of the Board.

Since the approval of the plan, through June 30, 2025, a total of 20,350 shares have been repurchased at an average price of $27.42. No shares were repurchased during thethree and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024.