METHODE ELECTRONICS INC
For the period ended May 3, 2025. Filed Jul 9, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Jul 9, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Methode Electronics, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Methode Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of May 3, 2025, and April 27, 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 3, 2025, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at May 3, 2025 and April 27, 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 3, 2025, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of May 3, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated July 9, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Goodwill Impairment Assessment of the Nordic Lights Reporting Unit
| Description of the Matter | At May 3, 2025, the Company’s Nordic Lights reporting unit had $46.4 million of goodwill, as disclosed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually or when impairment indicators are present. The Company determined the fair value of its Nordic Lights reporting unit exceeded the carrying value. Auditing management’s goodwill impairment assessment of the Nordic Lights reporting unit was complex and highly judgmental due to the estimation required in determining the fair value of the reporting unit. The more subjective assumptions used in the fair value estimate were projections of future revenue growth rates and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization margin and the discount rate, which are all affected by expectations about future market or economic conditions. |
|---|
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of relevant internal controls over the Company’s goodwill impairment assessment process for the Nordic Lights reporting unit, including controls over management’s review of the significant assumptions discussed above. We also tested management’s controls over the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the valuation.To test the estimated fair value of the Nordic Lights reporting unit, our audit procedures included, among others, assessing the methodology and testing the significant assumptions described above and the underlying data used by the Company in its analysis. For example, we compared significant assumptions to historical performance and other guideline companies within the same industry. We performed a sensitivity analysis of the more subjective assumptions when necessary to evaluate the change in the fair value of the reporting unit resulting from changes in the assumptions. We also assessed the historical accuracy of management’s forecasting process and involved our valuation specialists to evaluate the model, method, and certain significant assumptions, such as the discount rate. |
|---|
/s/Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1966.
Chicago, Illinois
July 9, 2025
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Methode Electronics, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Methode Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of May 3, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Methode Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 3, 2025, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of May 3, 2025 and April 27, 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 3, 2025, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) and our report dated July 9, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
July 9, 2025
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.