Outset Medical Inc

Report of Independent Regist ered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

Outset Medical, Inc.:

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Outset Medical, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 28, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Sufficiency of audit evidence over Tablo console revenue and service agreement revenue

As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company derives revenue primarily from the sales of its products and services. Product revenue consists primarily of sales of Tablo consoles and related consumables, including Tablo cartridges and accessories. Service and other revenue consists primarily of revenue generated from service agreements and other revenue from shipping and handling charged to customers. The Company’s contracts with customers often include multiple performance obligations, such as products and services. The Company determines the amount and timing of revenue recorded for each performance obligation.

We identified the evaluation of the sufficiency of audit evidence over Tablo console revenue and service agreement revenue as a critical audit matter. During the year, two separate processes, including a manual process and a newly implemented automated process, were used in the recognition and recording of revenue. Challenging auditor judgment was required to evaluate the sufficiency of audit evidence due to the use of multiple processes throughout the year, as well as the nature of each process used in the Company’s determination of Tablo console revenue and service agreement revenue, including the timing of the revenue recognized.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We applied auditor judgment to determine the nature and extent of procedures to be performed over the Company’s determination of Tablo console revenue and service agreement revenue, including the timing of the revenue recognized. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain controls related to the Company’s process to determine Tablo console revenue and service agreement revenue. This included controls over the Company’s determination and timing of revenue recognized using the manual and automated processes. We also involved IT professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in testing certain IT application and general IT controls used in the Company’s determination of Tablo console revenue and service agreement revenue. For samples of Tablo console revenue transactions and service agreement revenue transactions recorded under both the Company’s manual and automated processes, we evaluated the amount and timing of revenue recognized by comparing it to the underlying contract, and/or other supporting documentation, and recalculating the Company’s determination of revenue recognized. In addition, we evaluated the overall sufficiency of audit evidence obtained over Tablo console revenue and service agreement revenue by assessing the results of procedures performed, including the appropriateness of the nature and extent of audit effort.

/s/KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2011.

San Francisco, California

February 28, 2025

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

Outset Medical, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Outset Medical, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements), and our report dated February 28, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California

February 28, 2025