QuantumScape Corp
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 26, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Feb 26, 2025
Contents
Item 1. Business
Overview
QuantumScape is a leader in developing next-generation solid-state lithium-metal battery technology for electric vehicles (“EVs”) and other applications. QuantumScape Battery Inc. was founded in 2010 with the mission to revolutionize energy storage to enable a sustainable future.
We are at the beginning of a forecasted once-in-a-century shift in automotive powertrains, from internal combustion engines (“ICE”) to clean EVs. After 30 years of gradual improvements in conventional lithium-ion batteries, the benefits of EVs have been demonstrated, principally in the premium passenger car market. However, there are fundamental limitations inhibiting widespread adoption of battery technology, and we believe the automotive market needs a step change in battery technology to make mass market EVs competitive with the fossil fuel alternative.
We have spent over a decade developing a proprietary solid-state battery technology to meet this challenge. QuantumScape’s solid-state lithium-metal battery technology is designed to offer greater energy density, faster charging, and enhanced safety when compared to today’s conventional lithium-ion batteries. We believe no other lithium-metal battery technology has demonstrated the capability of achieving automotive rates of power (power is the rate at which a battery can be charged and discharged) with acceptable battery cycle life at modest levels of pressure (approximately 3 to 4 atmospheres (“atm”)).
Since 2012, we have developed a strong partnership with Volkswagen Group of America Investments, LLC (“VGA”) and certain of its affiliates (together with VGA, “Volkswagen”). Volkswagen is one of the largest car companies in the world and intends to be a leader in EVs. Over the last ten years Volkswagen has invested approximately $380 million in us. Over the course of our relationship, Volkswagen has successfully tested multiple generations of certain of our single-layer and multilayer prototype cells at automotive rates of power. In July 2024, we entered into a Collaboration Agreement (the “PowerCo Collaboration Agreement”) with PowerCo SE (“PowerCo”) , a battery cell company wholly owned by Volkswagen, with the goal of industrializing the solid-state lithium-metal battery technology we intend to use in our first planned product—the QSE-5 (the “QSE-5 Technology”)—and concurrently entered into a Joint Venture Termination and Release Agreement (the “JV Termination Agreement”) and terminated the Joint Venture Agreement (as amended, the “JVA”) that VWGoA, VGA and QuantumScape originally executed in 2018.
While we signed an agreement with PowerCo with the goal of commercializing our battery technology, we intend to continue working closely with automotive Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) to make our solid-state battery cells widely available over time. In addition, we have signed customer sampling agreements with a number of OEMs, ranging from leading manufacturers by global revenue to premium performance and luxury carmakers, to collaborate with us in the testing and validating of our solid-state battery cells with the goal to include such cells into pre-production prototype vehicles and ultimately into serial production vehicles. We are currently focused on automotive EV applications, which have among the most stringent sets of requirements for batteries. However, we recognize that our solid-state battery technology has applicability in other large and growing markets, including stationary storage and consumer electronics, and intend to explore opportunities in those areas as appropriate.
We are focusing on a technology licensing business model. Nevertheless, we believe that our technology may be utilized under a variety of business models and presents opportunities with a variety of potential customers, such as automotive OEMs, end-users, and licensees, as applicable. In addition to the collaboration with PowerCo, which contemplates a licensing arrangement, we may operate solely-owned manufacturing facilities, license technology to other manufacturers, or enter into joint venture arrangements, among other approaches. We intend to continue to invest in research and development to improve battery cell performance, improve manufacturing processes, and reduce cost.
Industry Background
Shift to EVs
We believe that evolving consumer preferences coupled with relevant government incentives and regulations are driving a once-in-a-century shift to EVs.
Countries around the world are promoting EVs. The dependence on gasoline-powered “ICE” vehicles has heightened environmental concerns, created reliance among industrialized and developing nations on large oil imports, and exposed consumers to unstable fuel prices and health concerns related to heightened emissions. Many national and regional regulatory bodies have adopted legislation to incentivize or require a shift to lower-emission and zero-emission vehicles. For example, over a dozen countries including the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Sweden, Germany, France and Norway have announced intentions to either increase applicable environmental targets or outright ban the sale of new ICE vehicles in the next two decades. In 2023, the European Union approved a ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars beginning in 2035, other than ICE vehicles operating on carbon-neutral fuels.
Furthermore, consumers are increasingly considering EVs for a variety of reasons including better performance, growing EV charging infrastructure, significantly lighter environmental impact, and lower maintenance and operating costs. Automakers such as Tesla, Inc. have demonstrated that premium EVs can deliver a compelling alternative to fossil fuels. As EVs become more competitive and more affordable, we believe that they will continue to take market share from ICE vehicles. We believe that this shift will occur across vehicle types and market segments. However, the inherent limitations of lithium-ion battery technology continue to impede improvements in EV competitiveness on range and charging times compared with ICE vehicles.
Current Battery Technology Will Not Meet the Requirements for Broad Adoption of EVs
Despite the significant progress in the global shift to EVs, in the U.S. the market remains dominated by ICE vehicles. According to Bloomberg, approximately 17% of global car sales in 2023 were electric including plug-in hybrids. For EVs to be adopted globally at scale across market segments, batteries need to improve. In particular, we believe there are five key requirements to drive broad adoption of EVs:
Battery capacity (energy density). EVs need to be able to drive over 300 miles on a single charge to be competitive with ICE vehicles and achieve broad market adoption. The space required for conventional lithium-ion battery technology limits the range of many EVs. Higher energy density will enable automotive OEMs to increase battery pack energy without increasing the size and weight of the vehicle’s battery pack.
Fast charging capability. EV batteries need to be fast charging to replicate the speed and ease with which a gasoline car can be refueled. We believe this objective is achieved with the ability to charge from 10% to 80% capacity in approximately 15 minutes or less, faster than today’s conventional batteries can deliver without materially degrading battery cycle life.
Safety (nonflammable). EV batteries need to replace as many of the flammable components in the battery as possible with non-flammable equivalents to reduce the extent of damage caused by a fire. With current batteries, many failure conditions can result in fires, for example malfunctions that can result in short-circuits and battery damage from accidents.
Battery cycle life. Batteries need to be usable for the life of the vehicle, typically 12 years or 150,000 miles. If the battery fades prematurely, EVs will not be an economically practical alternative.
Cost. Mass market adoption of EVs requires a battery that is capable of high performance while remaining cost competitive.
Since these requirements have complex interlinkages, most manufacturers of conventional lithium-ion batteries used in today’s cars are forced to make trade-offs. For example, conventional batteries can be fast charged, but at the cost of adversely impacting their battery cycle life.
We believe that a battery technology that can meet these requirements will enable an EV solution that is much more broadly competitive with ICE vehicles. According to the Organisation Internationale des Constructeurs d’Automobiles, approximately 93 million vehicles were produced in 2023 across the auto industry, representing a significant untapped demand for a battery that meets these requirements.
Limitations of Conventional Lithium-ion Battery Technologies
The last significant development in battery technology was the commercialization of lithium-ion batteries in the early 1990s which created a new class of batteries with higher energy density. Lithium-ion batteries have enabled a new generation of mobile electronics, efficient renewable energy storage, and the start of the transition to electrified mobility.
Since the 1990s, conventional lithium-ion batteries have gradually improved in energy density. Most increases in energy density have come from improved cell design and incremental improvements in cathode and anode technology. However, there is no Moore’s law in batteries—it has taken conventional lithium-ion batteries at least 10 years to double in energy density and it has been approximately 30 years since the introduction of a major new high-energy chemistry. As the industry approaches the theoretical limit of achievable energy density for lithium-ion batteries, we believe a new architecture is required to deliver meaningful gains in energy density.
Batteries have a cathode (the positive electrode), an anode (the negative electrode), a separator that prevents contact between the anode and cathode, and an electrolyte that transports ions but not electrons. A conventional lithium-ion battery (as shown in the figure below) uses a liquid electrolyte, a polymer separator, and an anode made principally of carbon (graphite) or a carbon/silicon composite. Lithium ions move from the cathode to the anode when the battery is charged and vice versa during discharge.
Conventional Lithium-Ion Battery Architecture
In a fully discharged lithium-ion cell, the lithium in the cell resides in the cathode. When the cell is charged, lithium ions move from the cathode to the anode, where they diffuse into the carbon particles that make up the anode. In the fully charged state, the lithium ions sit in the anode. When the battery is discharged, these lithium ions are allowed to move back from the anode to the cathode, and in the process, energy can be extracted from the system.
One limit to the energy density of conventional lithium-ion batteries is imposed by the anode, which provides a host material made of carbon (graphite) and/or silicon to hold the lithium ions, preventing them from binding together into pure metallic lithium. Metallic lithium, when used with conventional liquid electrolytes and porous separators, can form growths of lithium known as dendrites, which can penetrate through the separator and short-circuit the cell.
While using a host material in the anode is an effective way to prevent dendrites, this host material adds volume and mass to the cell, adds cost to the battery, and limits the battery cycle life due to side reactions at the interface with the liquid electrolyte. The rate at which lithium diffuses through the anode also limits the maximum cell power.
The addition of silicon to a carbon anode provides a boost to energy density relative to a pure carbon anode. However, silicon is a host material that not only suffers from the limitations of carbon as discussed above, but also introduces cycle life challenges as a result of the repeated expansion and contraction of the silicon particles, since silicon undergoes significantly more expansion than carbon when hosting lithium ions. Furthermore, the voltage of the lithium-silicon reaction subtracts from the overall cell voltage, reducing cell energy.
Lithium-Metal Anode Required to Unlock Highest Energy Density
We believe that an anode-free lithium-metal cell is the most promising approach that can break out of the constraints inherent in conventional lithium-ion batteries and enable significant improvements in energy density.
Our battery cells have none of the host materials used in conventional anodes. Our cells are “anode-free” in that they are manufactured without anodes in a discharged state. When the cell is first charged, lithium moves out of the cathode, diffuses through our solid-state electrolyte-separator and plates in a thin metallic layer directly on the anode current collector, forming an anode. When the battery cell is discharged, the lithium diffuses back into the cathode. Eliminating the host material reduces the size and weight of the battery cell and eliminates the associated materials and manufacturing costs. This results in the highest theoretical gravimetric energy density for a lithium-based battery system if the system can be manufactured without excess lithium on the anode.
Lithium-metal anodes are generally compatible with conventional cathode materials, and lithium-metal batteries will derive some benefit from continued improvement in conventional cathode materials. Moreover, lithium-metal anodes may enable future generations of higher energy cathodes, such as the metal fluorides, that may not achieve significant energy density gains when used with lithium-ion anodes, as shown in the figure below.
Modeled Cell Specific Energy
Source : Andre et al, J Mater Chem A. (2015) 6709
Note: Modeled cell specific energy is based on traditional cell designs and architectures
Although the industry has understood for over 40 years the potential benefits of lithium-metal anodes, the industry has not been able to develop a separator that makes a lithium-metal anode practical for rechargeable applications.
Solid-State Electrolyte-Separator Required to Enable Lithium-Metal Anode
We believe that a lithium-metal battery requires that the porous separators used in conventional lithium-ion batteries be replaced with a solid-state electrolyte-separator capable of conducting lithium ions between the cathode and anode at rates comparable to conventional liquid electrolyte while also suppressing the formation of lithium dendrites, which are growths of lithium metal which can grow across the separator and short-circuit the cell. While various solid-state separators have been shown to operate at low power densities, such low power densities are not useful for most practical applications. To our best knowledge, we are the only company that has been able to demonstrate a solid-state separator for lithium-metal batteries capable of resisting dendrite formation at higher power densities such as those required for automotive applications, and fast charging, for at least 800 cycles at around 25 °C.
We believe that our ability to develop this proprietary solid-state electrolyte-separator will enable the shift from lithium-ion to lithium-metal batteries.
Our Technology
Our proprietary solid-state lithium-metal cell represents the next-generation of battery technology.
Eliminating the anode host material found in conventional lithium-ion cells increases the volumetric energy density. A pure lithium-metal anode also enables the theoretically highest gravimetric energy density for a lithium battery system, if the system can be manufactured without excess lithium on the anode.
Our cell design includes an inorganic solid ceramic film that has characteristics of both a separator and an electrolyte. This ceramic solid-state electrolyte-separator is our core technology breakthrough that enables reliable cycling of the lithium-metal anode battery. A working solid-state electrolyte-separator is needed to prevent the formation of dendrites that would normally grow through a traditional porous separator and short circuit the cell. An effective solid-state electrolyte-separator requires a solid material that has ionic conductivity in a range similar to liquid electrolytes, chemically stable next to lithium — one of the most reactive elements in the periodic table — and able to resist the formation of dendrites. Our team has worked over ten years to develop a composition that meets these requirements and to develop techniques necessary to manufacture the electrolyte-separator material at scale using a continuous process. We have a number of patents covering both the composition of this material and key steps of its manufacturing process. While current generations of our prototype battery cells contain our proprietary solid-state electrolyte-separator and an organic liquid cathode electrolyte (i.e. catholyte), solid catholyte materials are part of our ongoing research and development investigations.
Our Cells and Separator
Note: Cell dimensions: approximately 85mm x 66mm x 5mm
All references to our “separator,” “electrolyte-separator,” “solid-state separator,” “solid-state electrolyte-separator,” in this Report refer to our proprietary solid-state electrolyte-separator.
Our solid-state electrolyte-separator is a dense, entirely inorganic ceramic. As shown in the figure above, it is made into a film that is thinner than a human hair and then cut into pieces. Our separator is flexible because it has a low defect density and is thin. In contrast, typical household ceramics are less flexible and can break due to defects which can reduce structural integrity.
The basic building block of our designed battery package is the unit cell, consisting of a double-sided cathode with a solid-state electrolyte-separator on either side. We stack these unit cells together to form multilayer cells. We first demonstrate new functionality using these unit cells.
(1) For illustrative purposes only. Designs vary based on customer specifications.
In 2022, we shipped A0 prototype battery cells to multiple automotive OEMs for testing. In 2024, we began producing low volumes of our first B-sample cells, and we began shipping these cells for automotive customer testing. These are B-samples of our first product, QSE-5 a ~5 amp-hour cell with measured performance of over 800 Wh/L, and < 15 minute fast charge from 10% to 80% of capacity. However, our potential customers may require the development of cells with different capacity, layer count or dimensions.
As we move from prototypes to commercial products, we will need to continue improving the quality and consistency of materials and processes for higher volume manufacturing. We need more production capacity to make the large number of multilayer cells needed for testing and for process optimization, including yield improvement and reliability. We have been designing and procuring new automation and higher-volume pre-pilot equipment that we expect will increase both output and reliability.
Our cathodes use a combination of conventional cathode active materials such as nickel-manganese-cobalt (“NMC”) or a cobalt-free, nickel-free composition like lithium-iron-phosphate (“LFP”) with a catholyte made of an organic liquid. In the future, we may use other compositions of cathode active materials. Over the years, we have developed catholytes made of differing mixtures of organic liquid electrolyte to optimize performance across multiple metrics such as voltage, temperature, power, and safety, among others. We continue to test solid, gel and liquid catholytes from time to time in our cells. The solid catholyte is part of our ongoing research and development investigation into inorganic catholytes. Our separator platform is being designed to enable faster charge rates for thicker cathode electrodes, which, when combined with a lithium-metal anode, may further increase cell energy densities.
We have developed a new cell format that combines features of a conventional pouch cell and a prismatic cell to address the challenges of lithium-metal expansion. This cell architecture is designed to accommodate expansion as the cell charges and the anodes of each layer are plated with lithium metal, and conversely, the contraction as the cell discharges. Additionally, the format is designed to allow the cell to simultaneously dissipate excess heat during fast charging, function with or without externally applied pressure, enable high-volume manufacturing and pack integration, and offer good packaging efficiency to achieve our cell-level energy density targets.
We believe our battery technology may provide significant improvements in energy density compared to today’s conventional lithium-ion batteries, as shown in the figure below.
† QS projections and targets based on existing estimates and model assumptions Sources: Li-ion cell energy density from batemo.com database, charge times from ev-database.org and insideevs.com (for Rivian R1T)
Benefits of Our Technology
We believe our battery technology will enable significant benefits across battery capacity, charging rate, safety, and cycle life while minimizing cost. We believe these benefits will provide significant value to automotive OEMs by enabling greater customer adoption of their EVs. By solving key pain-points such as 15-minute fast charging from 10% to 80% of capacity, we believe our battery technology will enable the delivery of an EV experience that is significantly more competitive with fossil fuel vehicles than what today’s EVs can achieve with conventional lithium-ion batteries.
Our battery technology is intended to meet the five key requirements we believe will enable mass market adoption of EVs:
Energy density. Our battery design is intended to increase volumetric and gravimetric energy density by eliminating the carbon/silicon anode host material found in conventional lithium-ion cells. This increased energy density will enable EV manufacturers to increase range without increasing the size and weight of the battery pack, or to reduce the size and weight of the battery pack which will reduce the cost of the battery pack and other parts of the vehicle.
Fast charging capability. Our battery technology containing our solid-state separator material has been tested to demonstrate the ability to charge from 10% to 80% capacity in approximately 15 minutes or less, which is generally faster than today’s conventional batteries can deliver without materially degrading battery cycle life. In these conventional batteries, the limiting factor for charge rate is the rate of diffusion of lithium ions into the anode. If a conventional battery is charged at high rate, especially at high state-of-charge or low temperature, lithium can start plating on carbon particles of the anode rather than diffuse into the carbon particles. This causes a reaction between the plated lithium and liquid electrolyte which reduces cell capacity and increases the risk of dendrites that can short circuit the cell. With a lithium-metal anode, using our solid-state separator, we expect the lithium to be plated as fast as the cathode can deliver it. Nonetheless, repeated fast-charging of battery cells may result in cycle life degradation, as is the case in conventional lithium-ion batteries.
Enhanced safety. Our solid-state battery cell uses a ceramic separator which is not combustible and we believe is therefore safer than conventional polymer separators. This ceramic separator is also capable of withstanding temperatures considerably higher than those that would melt conventional polymer separators, providing an additional measure of safety. Although additional safety tests need to be performed as our materials and processes evolve, in 2023 we ran a suite of safety tests on a limited number of our A0 prototype cells, including nail penetration, overcharge, external short circuit, and thermal stability testing up to 300°C (higher than the 180°C melting point of lithium). The A0 prototype cells successfully passed these automotive safety tests according to the specification set by a leading OEM, with hazard levels of 3 or lower as defined by EUCAR and SAE J2464 standards. One noteworthy result from prototype cell testing was demonstrating thermal stability up to 300°C; for reference, we tested conventional high-energy lithium-ion cells, which burst into flames between 174°C and 185°C. In 2024, we again performed nail penetration, overcharge, external short circuit, and thermal stability testing up to 300°C and our B0 samples passed these tests with hazard levels of 3 or lower as defined by EUCAR and SAE J2464 standards. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we note that although the A0 and B0 prototype cells have passed these automotive safety tests performed in our laboratories, we have been able to test these cells to the point of failure under additional modified test conditions. Moreover, these safety test results for the A0 and B0 prototype cells are not necessarily representative of those of subsequent generations of our cells since safety is a function of a cell’s materials composition, which changes from one generation of cells to the another. We will continue safety testing under different conditions, including on aged cells. We also need to test a much larger sampling of cells to ensure statistical significance.
Battery cycle life. We are designing our technology to enable increased battery cycle life relative to conventional lithium-ion batteries. In a conventional cell, a reason that battery capacity fades over time is the gradual irreversible loss of lithium due to side reactions between the liquid electrolyte and the anode. By eliminating the anode host material, we expect to eliminate those anode side reactions to enable longer battery cycle life. Our top-performing A0 prototype cell in one prospective customer’s battery testing labs achieved over 1,000 full cycle equivalents with over 95% discharge energy retention, using customer-specified test conditions of C/3 charge and C/2 discharge with our standard temperature and pressure conditions, and 100% depth of discharge. This performance exceeds the cycle life and capacity retention in battery warranties for some of the best-selling EVs in the U.S. market today, which require that cells retain at least 70% of the rated capacity for 150,000 miles.
Cost. Our battery technology eliminates the anode host material and the associated manufacturing costs, providing a structural cost advantage compared to traditional lithium-ion batteries. When comparing manufacturing facilities of similar scale and upon achieving process maturity, we estimate that eliminating these costs has the potential to provide cost savings compared to the costs of building traditional lithium-ion batteries.
Our Competitive Strengths
Only lithium-metal battery technology showing capability to meet automotive requirements for power, cycle life, and temperature range to our knowledge. We have built and tested single-layer and multilayer solid-state cells and have demonstrated that our technology shows the capability to meet automotive requirements for power, cycle life, temperature range, and safety. Since 2018 Volkswagen has tested multiple generations of our prototype cells, including single-layer and multilayer prototype cells. In 2024, Volkswagen announced it had successfully tested our A0 prototype cells at automotive rates of power, noting that the A0 prototype cell was also able to meet the requirements for other test criteria such as fast charging capability, safety and self-discharge. While we signed an agreement with PowerCo with the goal of commercializing our battery technology, we intend to continue working closely with automotive OEMs to make our solid-state battery cells widely available over time. In addition, we have signed customer sampling agreements with a number of OEMs, ranging from leading manufacturers by global revenue to premium performance and luxury carmakers, to collaborate with us in the testing and validating of our solid-state battery cells with the goal to include such cells into pre-production prototype vehicles and ultimately into serial production vehicles.
Partnership with one of the world’s largest automotive OEMs. We are partnered with Volkswagen, one of the largest automakers in the world. Volkswagen has been a major investor since 2012 and has invested approximately $380 million in us. In addition, in July 2024, we entered into the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement, a battery cell company wholly owned by the Volkswagen Group, with the goal of industrializing the solid-state lithium-metal battery technology we intend to use in our first planned product—the QSE-5.
High barriers to entry and extensive patent and intellectual property portfolio. As of December 31, 2024, we owned, or licensed on an exclusive basis, approximately 350 U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications – including broad fundamental patents around our core technology. Our proprietary solid-state separator uses the only material we know of that can cycle lithium at automotive-level current densities and room temperature without forming dendrites. We have a range of patents, including patents that cover:
Material compositions, including the optimal compositions as well as wide-ranging coverage of a number of variations for the separator and other battery components;
Enabling battery technology and methods required to incorporate a separator into a battery;
Manufacturing technology, protecting the way to make the separator at scale without semiconductor-style vacuum production or batch processes used in traditional ceramics; and
Material dimensions, including our proprietary separator, covering any separator with commercially practical thicknesses for a solid-state battery.
Significant development focused on next-gen technology for automotive applications. We have spent over a decade developing our battery technology. Many of our technical team members have worked at large battery manufacturers and automotive OEMs. Through its experience, our team has significant technical know-how and is supported by extensive facilities and equipment, development infrastructure, and data analytics.
Designed for volume production. Our battery cells are designed to use earth-abundant materials and processes suitable for higher volume production. Our earlier-generation manufacturing process for our proprietary solid-state separator used equipment that was already available at scale in the battery or ceramics industries. We are developing subsequent, proprietary higher-volume separator manufacturing processes that seek to further reduce cost, increase throughput, and improve quality. While preparing for scale production, we have purchased or tested production-intent equipment from the world’s leading vendors. In particular, we expect to produce our proprietary solid-state separator using scalable continuous-flow heat treatment to process separator films more rapidly while applying less total heat energy per film. Although our separator material is proprietary, the inputs are readily available and can be sourced from multiple suppliers across different geographies.
Structural cost advantage leveraging industry cost trends. Aside from the solid-state separator, our battery is being designed to use many generally available materials and processes that are standard across today’s battery manufacturers. As a result, we expect to benefit from the projected industry-wide cost declines for these materials that result from process improvements and economies of scale. We believe that the manufacturing of our solid-state battery cells at scale provides us with a structural cost advantage because our battery cells are manufactured without an anode.
Our Growth Strategy
Continue to develop our commercial battery technology and manufacturing capabilities. We will continue developing our battery technology with the goal of enabling commercial production subsequent to the automotive qualification process, which generally involves several major delivery milestones of A, B and C samples. We have demonstrated capabilities of our solid-state separator and battery technology in single-layer and multilayer cell cycling data. In 2022, we shipped our first A0 prototype battery cells to multiple OEMs for testing. In 2024, we shipped B0 samples of our first commercial product, the QSE-5. As we move from prototypes to commercial products, we will need to continue improving the quality and consistency of materials and processes for higher volume manufacturing, including increased precision through automation and process control, quality of material inputs, and particle reduction across our process flow. We will continue to work to further develop and validate the volume manufacturing processes to enable higher volume manufacturing by us or our licensing partners and minimize manufacturing costs. We will continue to work on increasing the yield of our solid-state separator to reduce scrappage and to increase utilization of manufacturing equipment.
Expand relationships with other automotive OEMs. While we expect Volkswagen will be the first to commercialize vehicles using our battery technology, we are, and over the next few years intend to continue, working closely with other automotive OEMs to make our solid-state battery cells widely available over time. Subject to the terms of the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement, we are not prohibited from working in parallel with other automotive OEMs or other non-automotive companies to commercialize our technology. We have signed customer sampling agreements with a number of OEMs, ranging from leading manufacturers by global revenue to premium performance and luxury carmakers, to collaborate with us in the testing and validation of our solid-state battery cells with the goal to include such cells into pre-production prototype vehicles and ultimately into serial production vehicles.
Expand target markets. We are currently focused on automotive EV applications, which have the most stringent set of requirements for batteries. However, we recognize that our solid-state battery technology has applicability in other large and growing markets including stationary storage and consumer electronics such as smartphones and wearables. For example, we have signed agreements with companies to evaluate our batteries for inclusion in their stationary energy storage and consumer electronics applications.
Expand commercialization models. Our technology is being designed to enable a variety of business models. In addition to collaboration with PowerCo, which contemplates a licensing arrangement, we may operate solely-owned manufacturing facilities, license technology to other manufacturers, or enter into joint venture arrangements, among other approaches. We intend to continue to invest in research and development to improve battery cells performance, improve manufacturing process and reduce cost. Where appropriate, we may build and sell solid-state separators or cell layers rather than complete battery cells.
Manufacturing Process Development
We are building a battery development pilot line at our facilities in San Jose, California to provide a sufficient quantity of separators and cells for internal development, customer sampling, and higher volumes of QSE-5 cells. Our pilot line is intended to consist of a continuous flow, automated line with sufficient capacity and process maturity to engage in automotive qualification. Ultimately, our pilot line is intended to serve as the basis for continued manufacturing process development for the subsequent scale up of our manufacturing capabilities, including to support collaboration and future technology transfer activities as part of the collaboration and licensing arrangements with PowerCo as well as potential future commercial arrangements.
Our battery manufacturing process is being designed to be very similar to that of conventional lithium-ion battery manufacturing, with a few exceptions:
We use a proprietary separator material instead of the porous polyolefin separator used in lithium-ion cells.
We assemble our cell by stacking these separators together with cathodes and current collectors using proprietary joining methods.
Our architecture eliminates the need for anode manufacturing, reducing capital investment and lowering operating costs.
Our cell design allows us to shorten the weeks-long aging process required for conventional lithium-ion cells, thus decreasing manufacturing cycle time and reducing working capital needs.
Our architecture depends on our proprietary solid-state separator. Though our separator design is unique, our manufacturing process leverages established or similar high-volume production processes already deployed in other industries. We are developing subsequent, proprietary higher-volume separator manufacturing processes that seek to further reduce cost, increase throughput, and improve quality.
We plan to source many input materials from industry leading suppliers to the lithium-ion battery industry, and we already have strategic relationships in place with the industry’s leading vendors of cathode material, the most critical purchased input to our cell, along with leading vendors of other less critical inputs. Our solid-state separator is made from abundant materials produced at industrial scale in multiple geographies.
Relative to conventional lithium-ion cells, our technology eliminates the anode material cost (e.g., carbon/silicon host material, electrolyte in the anode) and reduces manufacturing costs (e.g., no anode related manufacturing costs, reduced formation costs). This enables savings in materials, capital equipment and manufacturing time, as illustrated in the graphic below.
Partnerships
Volkswagen Collaboration
QuantumScape has had a strong collaborative relationship with Volkswagen since 2012. Our collaboration initially focused on the testing and evaluation of our battery technology with Volkswagen engineers working closely with our engineering team on our technology development efforts and battery testing. Volkswagen has made several rounds of equity investments in QuantumScape, and senior executives of Volkswagen joined our board of directors (the “Board”). During the early part of this collaboration we worked closely with members of Volkswagen’s global research and development team and then with Volkswagen's Center of Excellence for Battery Cells, which was tasked with commercializing battery technologies within Volkswagen. Currently, Dr. Günther Mendl, Head of Battery Center of Excellence, Volkswagen AG, and Sebastian Schebera, Head of Strategic Partnerships, Volkswagen AG, are members of the Board.
PowerCo Collaboration and Joint Venture Termination
QSV Operations LLC (“QSV”) was incorporated as a limited liability company in 2018. VWGoA, VGA and QuantumScape executed the JVA, effective September 2018, with the goal of jointly establishing a manufacturing facility to produce the pilot line of the Company’s product through QSV. In connection with this agreement, the parties also entered into two operating agreements: (i) the Limited Liability Company Agreement of QSV to govern the respective rights and obligations as members of QSV and (ii) the Common IP License Agreement for the Company to license certain intellectual property pertaining to automotive battery cells as defined in the JVA to VWGoA, VGA and QSV.
On July 5, 2024, we entered into the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement with the goal of industrializing the solid-state lithium-metal battery technology we intend to use in our first planned product—the QSE-5 Technology. PowerCo was formed by Volkswagen in 2022 as a company intended to consolidate Volkswagen’s activities in the development and production of battery cells. In connection with the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement and subject to the completion of certain milestones, we and PowerCo intend to enter into a license agreement (the “PowerCo IP License Agreement”) under which we will grant PowerCo a non-exclusive, limited, royalty-bearing license to use the QSE-5 Technology for the purpose of manufacturing and selling batteries primarily for automotive applications, and PowerCo will pre-pay an initial royalty fee of $130 million, against which any future royalties due will be credited. The initial royalty is subject to a time-based diminishing clawback if the PowerCo IP License Agreement is terminated early by PowerCo under certain conditions. The PowerCo Collaboration Agreement supersedes the JVA, which was terminated concurrently. As compared to a joint venture arrangement of similar output volumes, we expect the licensing arrangement to result in less revenue, as well as lower costs and capital requirements.
Research and Development
We conduct research and development at our headquarters facility in San Jose, California. Research and development activities concentrate on making further improvements to our battery technology including subsequent generations of prototype samples incorporating advances in cell functionality, process and reliability, and on improving the maturity of our production processes and pilot line.
Our research and development currently includes programs for the following areas:
Continued improvement of the cathode. Our cathodes use a conventional cathode active material such as NMC mixed with a catholyte. We plan to benefit from industry cathode chemistry improvements and/or cost reduction, which in the future may include use of other cathode active materials, including cobalt-free compositions, including LFP, as well as cathode processing advances such as dry electrode processing. Over the years, we have developed catholytes made of differing mixtures of organic liquid electrolyte in an effort to optimize performance across multiple metrics such as voltage, temperature, power, and safety, among others. We have tested solid, gel and liquid catholytes in our cells. The solid catholyte is part of our ongoing research and development investigation into inorganic catholytes. Our solid-state cathode platform is being designed to enable high rates of charge and discharge for even thicker cathode electrodes, which, when combined with a lithium-metal anode, may further increase cell energy densities.
Continued improvement in quality, consistency and reliability. We are working to improve the quality and uniformity of our cells, including our separators, to further improve, among other things, the cycling behavior, power, operating conditions, and reliability of our cells. For some of our early-generation processes, we used methods of continuous processing found at scale in both the battery and ceramic industries and we are working on continuous improvement of these processes, including better quality, consistency, and higher throughput through automation and process control (including specification tightening and adding or improving inspection points along the manufacturing process flow), quality of material inputs, and particle reduction across our process. We are also developing subsequent methods not typically used in ceramics that offer significant potential cost savings. Regarding consistency, we believe tightening the variability of separator quality will result in better yield. We plan to implement process improvements and controls necessary to manufacture higher quality, more consistent materials; we believe these activities will ultimately lead to higher reliability.
Continued improvement in throughput. Increasing the volume of separator production results in the increased quantities required for prototypes and delivery of more test cells to prospective customers. We continue to invest and deploy resources to automate our manufacturing process, including purchasing larger-scale manufacturing equipment, that we expect will substantially improve our manufacturing processes and, as a result, increase throughput required for product qualification and to achieve the cost, performance and volume levels required for commercial shipments.
Cell design. We have demonstrated capabilities of our solid-state separator and battery technology in single-layer and multilayer solid-state cells in commercially relevant areas (ranging from approximately 60x75mm to 70x85mm). In order to advance the maturity of our prototype cells and produce commercially viable solid-state battery cells, we must produce battery cells that achieve target cell design and capacities set by our customers and we may have to vary cell layer count and dimensions; while we target our first commercial product, the QSE-5, to have approximately 5 amp-hours of capacity, the exact number of layers and dimensions will vary and depend upon customer specifications, cell design considerations, and other factors. We will need to overcome production challenges to produce sufficient volumes of our separators and prototype battery cells to complete development of our first commercial product and for customer evaluation and product qualification purposes, as well as subsequent cell designs that may require different capacity, layer counts and dimensions.
Intellectual Property
The success of our business and technology leadership is supported by our proprietary battery technology. We rely upon a combination of patents, trademarks and trade secrets in the United States and other jurisdictions, as well as license agreements and other contractual protections, to establish, maintain and enforce rights in our proprietary technologies. In addition, we seek to protect our intellectual property through nondisclosure and invention assignment agreements with our employees and consultants and through non-disclosure agreements with business partners and other third parties. We regularly file applications for patents and have a significant number of patents in the United States and other countries where we expect to do business. Our patent portfolio is deepest in the area of solid-state separators with additional areas of strength in anodes, next-generation cathode materials, and cell, module, and pack design specific to lithium-metal batteries. Our trade secrets primarily cover manufacturing methods.
As of December 31, 2024, we owned, or licensed on an exclusive basis, more than 160 issued U.S. patents and patent applications, and more than 190 granted foreign patents and patent applications. Patents issued to us start expiring in 2033.
Competition
The EV market, and the battery segment in particular, is rapidly evolving and highly competitive. With the introduction of new technologies and the potential entry of new competitors into the market, we expect competition to increase in the future, which could harm our business, results of operations, or financial condition.
Our prospective competitors include major manufacturers currently supplying the industry, automotive OEMs and potential new entrants to the industry. Major companies now supplying batteries for the EV industry include Panasonic Corporation, Samsung SDI, Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited, LG Energy Solutions, BYD Co. Limited, SK Innovation Co. Limited and E-One Moli Energy Corporation. They supply conventional lithium-ion batteries and in many cases are seeking to develop solid-state batteries, including potentially lithium-metal batteries. In addition, because of the importance of electrification, many automotive OEMs are researching and investing in solid-state battery efforts and, in some cases, in battery development and production. For example, Tesla, Inc. is building multiple battery gigafactories and potentially could supply batteries to other automotive OEMs, and Toyota Motors and a Japanese consortium have a multi-year initiative pursuing solid-state batteries. Additionally, in 2024, China announced the China All-Solid-State Battery Collaborative Innovation Platform, which brings together government, academia and industry to develop and manufacture solid-state batteries that can compete globally.
A number of development-stage companies such as SES, Solid Power, Factorial, ION, Sakuu, ONE, Enovix, and Sila Nanotechonologies are also seeking to improve conventional lithium-ion batteries or to develop new technologies for solid-state and/or lithium-metal batteries. Potential new entrants are seeking to develop new technologies for cathodes, anodes, electrolytes and additives. Some of these companies have established relationships with automotive OEMs and are in varying stages of development.
We believe our ability to compete successfully with lithium-ion battery manufacturers and with other companies seeking to develop solid-state batteries will depend on a number of factors including battery price, safety, energy density, charge rate and cycle life, and on non-technical factors such as brand, established customer relationships and financial and manufacturing resources.
Many of the incumbents have, and future entrants may have, greater resources than we have and may also be able to devote greater resources to the development of their current and future technologies. They may also have greater access to larger potential customer bases and have and may continue to establish cooperative or strategic relationships amongst themselves or with third parties (including automotive OEMs) that may further enhance their resources and offerings.
Government Regulation and Compliance
There are government regulations pertaining to battery safety, transportation of batteries, use of batteries in cars, factory safety, and disposal of hazardous materials. We will ultimately have to comply with these regulations to sell our batteries into the market. The license and commercialization of our battery technologies abroad is likely to be subject to more stringent export controls in the future.
Employees and Human Capital
We pride ourselves on the quality of our world-class team and seek to hire only employees dedicated to our strategic mission. Many of our employees have significant experience working with large battery manufacturers and automotive OEMs. As of December 31, 2024, we employed approximately 800 employees, based primarily in our headquarters in San Jose, California. Many of our employees in our research and development and related functions hold engineering and scientific degrees, including many from the world’s top universities. In order to align our work force with our operational focus, in January 2025 we had a reduction in force impacting approximately 7% of the Company’s full-time employees at the time.
To date, we have not experienced any work stoppages and we consider our relationship with our employees to be good. None of our employees are either represented by a labor union or are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.
People and Culture
We seek team members who want to help solve a significant problem that will positively impact the world. We value diversity and recognize the importance of fostering a positive, inclusive culture. We seek to promote fair and equitable hiring and promotion processes and year-over-year improvements in diverse representation. Some of our actions to achieve this included delivering management training for our senior leaders, implementing a job leveling framework to ensure candidates are assessed against a consistent set of criteria, and making certain that our commitment to equal hiring and promotion opportunities is substantiated with equal pay for equal work by conducting an annual internal pay equity analysis.
Attraction and Retention
We are committed to maintaining equitable compensation programs including equity participation. We offer market-competitive salaries and strong equity compensation aimed at attracting and retaining team members capable of making exceptional contributions to our success. Our full-time regular employees hold equity in our company and are generally eligible for the employee stock purchase plan. Our compensation decisions are guided by the external market, role criticality, and the contributions of each team member. Our job-leveling framework and associated pay ranges allow us to maintain pay equity while offering the attractive and effective compensation needed as we grow and compete for talent.
Health and Safety
The health and safety of our employees is mission critical. We emphasize a proactive safety culture and maintain a supportive organization and work culture that encourages personal health and work-life balance for our employees. Our Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) department leads the programs that address workplace health and safety concerns through engineering controls, policies, procedures, training, monitoring and audits, and reports directly to our board of directors on a quarterly basis on such matters.
Available Information
Our investor relations website is located at https://ir.quantumscape.com, our X account handle is @QuantumScapeCo, our investor relations X account handle is @QuantumScapeIR, our Chief Executive Officer’s LinkedIn account is located at www.linkedin.com/in/siva-sivaram-1394ab5b/, our Chief Technology Officer’s X account handle is @ironmantimholme, our Chief Marketing Officer’s X account handle is @HussainAsim, and our corporate LinkedIn account is located at www.linkedin.com/company/quantumscape. We use our investor relations website, aforementioned X accounts and LinkedIn account to post important information for investors, including news releases, analyst presentations, and supplemental financial information, and as a means of disclosing material non-public information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. Accordingly, investors should monitor our investor relations website, aforementioned X accounts, and LinkedIn account in addition to following press releases, filings with the SEC and public conference calls and webcasts. We also make freely available, on our investor relations website under “SEC Filings,” our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing or furnishing those reports to the SEC.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.