Skip to main content

ACCO BRANDS Corp

For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 21, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2024 · Filed Feb 21, 2025

ACCO$5.35+1.5%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

ACCO Brands Corporation:

Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ACCO Brands Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of loss, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes and financial statement schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that

(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Write-down of certain finished goods inventory for obsolete and slow-moving items

As discussed in Notes 2 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the finished goods inventory balance as of December 31, 2024 was $231.2 million. The Company records inventory at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out) or net realizable value. The write-down of inventory for obsolete and slow-moving inventory items (OSMI) is recorded based on write-down percentages applied to certain finished goods inventory.

We identified the evaluation of the write-down of certain finished goods inventory for OSMI as a critical audit matter, due to the subjective auditor judgment involved in evaluating the Company’s estimate of the OSMI write-down, specifically for finished goods inventory. The key assumption used in determining the OSMI write-down was the write-down percentages applied to certain finished good inventory.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the Company’s evaluation of the OSMI finished goods inventory write-down process, including controls over the write-down percentages applied to certain finished good inventory. We obtained the OSMI finished goods inventory write-down assessment, and tested that the OSMI write-down was recorded based on the write-down percentages applied to certain finished good inventory. We compared current year write-offs and write-down percentages used to the prior year OSMI reserve and to historical write-down percentages used. We also analyzed a sample of inventory items to evaluate whether the appropriate write down percentage was applied based on the nature and condition of the item.

Impairment Assessment of Americas Reporting Unit Goodwill and Five Star Trade Name Intangible Asset

As discussed in Note 2 and Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the carrying value of the Company's goodwill and amortizable intangible assets as of December 31, 2024 was $446.4 million and $652.9 million, respectively. The Company performs a goodwill impairment assessment on an annual basis during the second quarter of each fiscal year and whenever circumstances or other events occur that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. During the second quarter of 2024, the Company identified a triggering events and performed a quantitative assessments as of May 31, 2024 and concluded that the goodwill specific to the Americas reporting unit and the Five Star trade name were impaired by $127.5 million and $37.7 million, respectively. As of June 1, 2024, the Company changed the Five Star indefinite-lived trade name to an amortizable intangible asset as it no longer met the indefinite-lived criteria.

We identified the evaluation of the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill for the Americas reporting unit and the Five Star trade name as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate certain assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of the Americas reporting unit and Five Star trade name, including forecasted revenues, market multiples, royalty rate, and the discount rates because they were based on determinations of future market and economic conditions. Changes to these assumptions could have had a significant effect on the Company’s assessment of the fair value of the Americas reporting unit and the Five Star trade name and the amount of impairment recorded. Additionally, involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge was required to assess the market multiples, royalty rate, and the discount rates and evaluate evidence obtained.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the Company’s goodwill and intangible asset impairment assessment process, including controls over the development of the assumptions described above. We evaluated the Company’s forecasted revenue for the Americas reporting unit, by comparing to the growth rates used in the Company’s prior quantitative impairment assessments, historical operating results, current year actual operating results, forecasted information in external industry reports, leadership communications, and external forecasted inflation rate data. We evaluated the Company's forecasted revenue for the Five Star trade name by comparing to historical growth rates, current year actual operating results, and forecasted growth rate data in external industry reports. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

evaluating the Company's market multiples by developing a range of market multiples based on external data for guideline public companies

assessing the royalty rate by comparing it to third party licensing agreements

evaluating the Company's discount rates by comparing the Company's inputs to the discount rates to publicly available data for comparable entities and assessing the resulting discount rates

testing the estimate of the Americas reporting unit fair value using the reporting unit's cash flow assumptions and discount rate, and comparing the result of the Company's fair value estimate

testing the estimate of the Five Star trade name fair value using the trade name's forecasted revenue assumptions, royalty rate, and discount rate, and comparing the result to the Company's fair value estimate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2009.

Chicago, Illinois

February 21, 2025

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.