Skip to main content

CRAWFORD & CO

For the period ended Dec 31, 2023. Filed Mar 4, 2024.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2023 · Filed Mar 4, 2024

CRD-A$12.00+2.3%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Report of Independent Regist ered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Crawford & Company

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Crawford & Company (the Company) as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss), shareholders' investment and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated March 4, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Deferred Revenues for Lifetime Claim Handling
Description of the MatterAt December 31, 2023, the Company’s deferred revenues related to lifetime claim handling arrangements were $39,800,000. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, revenue for lifetime claim handling is recognized over time as the related services are provided and performance obligations are satisfied. Revenue is recognized based on historical claim closure rates and claim type based on time elapsed for these claims, utilizing a portfolio approach. When the Company receives consideration from a customer prior to transferring services to the customer under the terms of certain claims management agreements, it records deferred revenues, which represent a contract liability.Auditing the estimate of deferred revenues related to lifetime claim handling was challenging given the high volume of data to derive the estimate and complex calculations used in the model to determine the amount of revenues to be deferred.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit Description of the Matter How We Addressed the Matter in Our AuditWe obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s review of the recognition of lifetime claim handling revenues and related deferred revenues. For example, we tested controls over management’s review of the deferred revenue model and the completeness and accuracy of the data used in the deferred revenue calculation.To test the Company’s lifetime claim handling deferred revenues, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, testing the completeness and accuracy of the closure rates by claim type and other data used in the deferred revenue model, and recalculating the lifetime claim handling deferred revenue liability using management's model. Additionally, we evaluated the appropriateness of the model and consistency with the prior period. Valuation of Goodwill – edjuster Reporting UnitAs discussed in Notes 1 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually on a reporting unit basis, and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. When performing a quantitative goodwill test, the Company determines the fair values of its reporting units using the discounted cash flow method, a form of the income approach, and the guideline public company method, a form of the market approach. As of October 1, 2023, the Company performed a quantitative impairment test of the edjuster reporting unit goodwill of $9,125,000. Auditing management’s estimates of the Company's edjuster reporting unit fair value using the discounted cash flow method involved especially subjective judgments due to the significant estimation uncertainty in determining the fair value of the reporting unit. In particular, the fair value estimate was sensitive to significant assumptions such as forecasted revenues, EBITDA margins, and discount rates. These significant assumptions are forward-looking and could be affected by future industry, market, and economic conditions. We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls over review of the fair value of the reporting unit. This included testing controls over management’s review of the significant assumptions described above.To test the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies used to estimate fair value, testing the significant assumptions used to develop the fair value estimate, and testing the underlying data used by the Company in its analyses for completeness and accuracy. For example, we evaluated management’s forecasted revenues and EBITDA margins used in the fair value estimate by comparing those assumptions to historical results and current industry, market, and economic forecasts. We also involved our valuation specialists to evaluate the valuation methodologies and the discount rate. As part of this evaluation, we compared the discount rate to market data. In addition, we performed sensitivity analyses on the significant assumptions to evaluate the potential changes in the fair value of the reporting unit that would result from changes in the assumptions. In addition, we tested management’s reconciliation of the fair values of its reporting units to the market capitalization of the Company.

/s/Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.

Atlanta, Georgia

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.