EXELIXIS INC

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Overview

Exelixis, Inc. (Exelixis, we, our or us) is an oncology company innovating next-generation medicines and combination regimens at the forefront of cancer care. Through the commitment of our drug discovery, development and commercialization resources, we have produced four marketed pharmaceutical products, two of which are formulations of our flagship molecule, cabozantinib. We continue to evolve our product portfolio, leveraging our investments, expertise and strategic partnerships to target an expanding range of tumor types and indications with our clinically differentiated pipeline of small molecules and biotherapeutics, including antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).

Sales related to cabozantinib account for the majority of our revenues. Cabozantinib is an inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases, including MET, AXL, VEGF receptors and RET and has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and in 69 other countries: as CABOMETYX® (cabozantinib) tablets for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (both alone and in combination with Bristol-Myers Squibb Company’s (BMS) nivolumab (OPDIVO®)), for previously treated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and for previously treated, radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC); and as COMETRIQ® (cabozantinib) capsules for progressive, metastatic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). For physicians treating these types of cancer, cabozantinib has become or is becoming an important medicine in their selection of effective therapies.

The other two products resulting from our discovery efforts are: COTELLIC® (cobimetinib), an inhibitor of MEK approved as part of multiple combination regimens to treat specific forms of advanced melanoma and marketed under a collaboration with Genentech, Inc. (a member of the Roche Group) (Genentech); and MINNEBRO® (esaxerenone), an oral, non-steroidal, selective blocker of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), approved for the treatment of hypertension in Japan and licensed to Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited (Daiichi Sankyo). See “—Collaborations and Business Development Activities—Other Collaborations.”

The year 2023 was our seventh year of annual profitability; it featured growth in net product revenues of approximately 16% year-over-year as a result of increased sales of our cabozantinib products in the U.S., supplemented by an approximately 22% year-over-year increase in royalties earned pursuant to collaboration agreements with our ex-U.S. partners. We plan to continue leveraging our operating cash flows to advance a broad array of diverse biotherapeutics and small molecule programs for the treatment of cancer, as well as to support ongoing company-sponsored and externally sponsored trials evaluating cabozantinib. The product candidates furthest along in our pipeline are: zanzalintinib, a novel, potent, next-generation oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets VEGF receptors, MET and the TAM kinases (TYRO3, AXL and MER); and XB002, a next-generation tissue factor (TF)-targeting ADC, administered via intravenous infusion and composed of a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) against TF that is conjugated to an auristatin-based microtubulin inhibitor (MTI) payload. Our internal drug discovery efforts are supplemented through in-licensing investigational oncology assets or obtaining options to acquire other investigational oncology assets from third parties if they demonstrate evidence of clinical success. Examples are: XL309, a clinical-stage and potentially best-in-class small molecule inhibitor of USP1, which has emerged as a synthetic lethal target in the context of BRCA-mutated tumors; and ADU-1805, a clinical-stage and potentially best-in-class mAb that targets SIRPα.

Exelixis Marketed Products: CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ

As detailed below, CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ have been approved to treat patients with various forms of cancer by the FDA for the U.S. market, the European Commission (EC) for the European Union (EU) markets and the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) for the Japanese market, as well as by comparable regulatory authorities across other markets worldwide.

In 2023, 2022 and 2021, we generated $1,628.9 million, $1,401.2 million and $1,077.3 million, respectively, in net product revenues from sales of CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ. Outside the U.S., we rely on collaboration partners for the commercialization of our cabozantinib products; Ipsen Pharma SAS (Ipsen) is responsible for all territories outside of the U.S. and Japan, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (Takeda) is responsible for the Japanese market. In 2023, 2022 and 2021, we earned $148.5 million, $121.4 million and $105.1 million, respectively, of royalties on net sales of cabozantinib products outside of the U.S. For additional information on the terms of our collaboration agreements with Ipsen and Takeda, see “—Collaborations and Business Development Activities—Cabozantinib Commercial Collaborations.”

Renal Cell Carcinoma - CABOMETYX is a Leading TKI Treatment Option for Patients with Advanced RCC

CABOMETYX has become a standard of care for the treatment of patients suffering from advanced RCC, and a growing number of these patients have been or will be treated with CABOMETYX. In 2023, approximately 32,700 patients with advanced kidney cancer required systemic therapy in the U.S., with over 21,000 patients receiving first-line treatment.

Since CABOMETYX was first approved, we have deployed our Medical Affairs and Commercial teams to educate physicians about CABOMETYX. We believe that the commercial success of CABOMETYX is attributable to the strength of the clinical data reflected in its FDA-approved labeling for advanced RCC. The indications for the treatment of RCC in the CABOMETYX label are based on the results of the METEOR, CABOSUN and CheckMate -9ER clinical trials. In July 2015, we announced positive results of METEOR, a phase 3 pivotal trial comparing CABOMETYX to everolimus in patients with advanced RCC who have experienced disease progression following treatment with at least one prior VEGF receptor inhibitor. These results formed the basis for the FDA’s approval in April 2016, following which CABOMETYX became the first single-agent therapy approved in the U.S. for previously treated advanced RCC to demonstrate statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in three key efficacy parameters in a global pivotal trial: overall survival (OS); progression-free survival (PFS); and objective response rate (ORR). To date, CABOMETYX remains the only single-agent therapy to have achieved these clinical results in previously treated advanced RCC. In October 2016, we announced positive results from CABOSUN, a randomized, open-label, active-controlled phase 2 trial conducted by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (the Alliance), comparing cabozantinib with sunitinib in patients with previously untreated advanced RCC with intermediate- or poor-risk disease. These results formed the basis for the FDA’s approval in December 2017 of CABOMETYX for previously untreated patients with advanced RCC, and for this patient population, CABOMETYX is the only approved single-agent therapy to demonstrate improved PFS compared with sunitinib, a first-generation TKI that was the previous standard of care.

CABOMETYX has also demonstrated positive clinical results in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), most notably in CheckMate -9ER, an open-label, randomized, multinational phase 3 pivotal trial evaluating CABOMETYX in combination with nivolumab versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced or metastatic RCC. Results from CheckMate -9ER demonstrated that the combination of CABOMETYX and nivolumab doubled PFS and ORR and reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 40% compared with sunitinib and formed the basis for the FDA’s approval of the combination in January 2021 as a first-line treatment of patients with advanced RCC. At four years of follow-up, the CheckMate -9ER results continued to show superior PFS and ORR in patients treated with CABOMETYX in combination with nivolumab over sunitinib, regardless of risk classification (as determined by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium scores). Superior OS was also observed in patients treated with the combination. These updated results, including data showing health-related quality-of-life benefits of the combination compared with sunitinib, were featured in an oral presentation at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2024 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium in January 2024. In addition, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the nation’s foremost non-profit alliance of leading cancer centers, has included the combination of CABOMETYX with nivolumab in its Clinical Practice Guidelines for Kidney Cancer as a Category 1 preferred option for the first-line treatment of patients with clear cell RCC across all risk groups, and as a Category 2A other recommended option for first-line non-clear cell RCC. The NCCN also lists single-agent CABOMETYX as a recommended regimen for patients with previously treated advanced clear cell RCC, supporting CABOMETYX’s position in the RCC treatment landscape across lines of therapy.

In 2023, in markets outside the U.S., we continued to work closely with our collaboration partner Ipsen in support of its regulatory strategy and commercialization efforts for CABOMETYX, both as a single agent and in combination with nivolumab, as well as in preparation for submission of applications for potential additional approvals of CABOMETYX, and similarly with our collaboration partner Takeda with respect to the Japanese market. As a result of the approvals of CABOMETYX and/or the combination of CABOMETYX with nivolumab for RCC indications in 69 countries outside of the U.S., including the Member States of the EU, Japan, the U.K., Canada, Brazil, Taiwan, South Korea, Australia and Hong Kong, CABOMETYX has continued to grow markedly outside the U.S. both in sales revenue and the number of RCC patients benefiting from its clinical effect.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma - CABOMETYX Offers an Important Alternative for Patients with Previously Treated HCC

Liver cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide, accounting for more than 900,000 new cases and 800,000 deaths each year. In the U.S., the incidence of liver cancer has tripled over the past four decades. Although HCC is the most common form of liver cancer, making up about three-fourths of the more than 41,600 cases of liver cancer estimated to be diagnosed in the U.S. during 2024, this patient population has long been underserved. Prior to 2017, there was only one approved systemic therapy for the treatment of HCC. Since that time, multiple new therapies were approved in the U.S. for HCC, both for previously untreated patients and for patients previously treated with sorafenib. However, during recent years, biopharmaceutical companies have developed new and demonstrably more effective therapies for previously untreated patients, including ICI combination therapies. These new treatment options have improved longer-term outcomes for HCC patients, thereby resulting in a greater number of them receiving multiple lines of therapy. Thus, the second- and later-line market for HCC therapies appears to have grown and become increasingly competitive, and we believe this trend may continue over the coming years, with monotherapy CABOMETYX maintaining an important place in the HCC treatment landscape.

The FDA’s approval of the HCC indication for CABOMETYX in January 2019 was based on our phase 3 pivotal study, CELESTIAL. The CELESTIAL study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating that cabozantinib significantly improved OS compared to placebo. The NCCN has included CABOMETYX in its Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma as a Category 1 option for the treatment of patients with HCC (Child-Pugh Class A only) as a subsequent-line systemic therapy if disease progression occurs, providing further support for CABOMETYX as an important treatment option for eligible HCC patients.

Outside the U.S., the EC’s approval of CABOMETYX provided physicians in the EU with a second approved therapy for the second-line treatment of this aggressive and difficult-to-treat cancer, and approvals from Health Canada and the Japanese MHLW brought a much-needed therapy to HCC patients in those countries. In addition to the Member States of the EU, Japan, the U.K. and Canada, CABOMETYX is also approved for previously treated HCC indications in Brazil, Taiwan, South Korea, Australia and Hong Kong, among other countries.

Differentiated Thyroid Cancer - An Opportunity for CABOMETYX to Help an Underserved Patient Population

Approximately 44,000 new cases of thyroid cancer will be diagnosed in the U.S. in 2024. Differentiated thyroid tumors, which make up about 90% of all thyroid cancers, are typically treated with surgery followed by ablation of the remaining thyroid with RAI. Approximately 5% to 15% of differentiated thyroid tumors are resistant to RAI treatment. With limited treatment options, these patients have a life expectancy of only three to six years from the time metastatic lesions are detected. In December 2020, we announced that COSMIC-311, our phase 3 pivotal trial evaluating cabozantinib in patients with RAI-refractory DTC who have progressed after receiving up to two prior VEGF receptor-targeted therapies, met one of its two primary endpoints, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in PFS compared with placebo. These results formed the basis for the FDA’s approval in September 2021 of CABOMETYX for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age and older with locally advanced or metastatic DTC that has progressed following prior VEGF receptor-targeted therapy and who are RAI-refractory or ineligible. Since our commercial launch of CABOMETYX in this patient group upon the FDA’s approval, we have established a strong market position for CABOMETYX amongst these previously treated DTC patients.

Outside the U.S., our collaboration partner Ipsen received approval from the EC in May 2022 for CABOMETYX as a monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic DTC, refractory or not eligible to RAI who have progressed during or after prior systemic therapy, which followed an approval from Health Canada in April 2022 to market CABOMETYX for a similar DTC indication.

Medullary Thyroid Cancer - COMETRIQ, the First Commercial Approval of Cabozantinib

Estimates suggest that there will be approximately 960 MTC cases diagnosed in the U.S. in 2024, and COMETRIQ has served as an important treatment option for these patients since January 2013. The FDA’s approval of COMETRIQ for progressive, metastatic MTC was based on our phase 3 trial, EXAM. The EXAM trial met its primary endpoint, demonstrating a statistically significant and clinically meaningful prolongation in PFS for cabozantinib compared with placebo. We are continuing to market COMETRIQ capsules for MTC patients at the labeled dose of 140 mg.

Exelixis Development Programs

Cabozantinib Development Program

Cabozantinib inhibits the activity of tyrosine kinases, including MET, AXL, VEGF receptors and RET. These receptor tyrosine kinases are involved in both normal cellular function and in pathologic processes such as oncogenesis, metastasis, tumor angiogenesis, drug resistance and maintenance of the tumor microenvironment. Beyond the established clinical benefits of cabozantinib in its approved indications, objective responses have been observed in patients treated with cabozantinib in additional individual tumor types investigated in early- and late-stage clinical trials, reflecting the medicine’s broad clinical potential. We are continuing to evaluate cabozantinib in combination with ICIs in late-stage clinical trials that we sponsor, along with our collaboration partners, across RCC and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Independent investigators also conduct trials evaluating cabozantinib through our Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with the National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (NCI-CTEP) or our investigator sponsored trial (IST) program. In addition to facilitating label expansion for the cabozantinib franchise, including potential regulatory submissions for cabozantinib to treat neuroendocrine tumors (NET) based on the positive results from the phase 3 CABINET study, data sets from these externally sponsored clinical trials may also prove valuable by informing our development plans for zanzalintinib. Moreover, our collaboration partners Ipsen and Takeda have conducted trials in their respective territories through independently-sponsored programs, as well as co-funding select cabozantinib trials with us.

Combination Studies with BMS

In February 2017, we entered into a clinical collaboration agreement with BMS for the purpose of conducting clinical studies combining cabozantinib with BMS’ PD-1 ICI, nivolumab, both with or without BMS’ CTLA-4 ICI, ipilimumab. Based on the data from CheckMate -9ER, the first clinical trial conducted under this collaboration, the FDA approved CABOMETYX in combination with nivolumab on January 22, 2021 as a first-line treatment of patients with advanced RCC. We continue to evaluate the triplet combination of cabozantinib with nivolumab and ipilimumab in COSMIC-313, a phase 3 pivotal trial in previously untreated advanced RCC. Pursuant to our agreements with BMS, each party is responsible for supplying finished drug product for the applicable clinical trial, and responsibility for the payment of costs for each trial is determined on a trial-by-trial basis. For additional information on the terms of the BMS clinical trial collaboration agreement, see “—Collaborations and Business Development Activities—Cabozantinib Development Collaborations—BMS Collaboration.”

COSMIC-313 - RCC. In May 2019, we initiated COSMIC-313, a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, controlled phase 3 pivotal trial evaluating the triplet combination of cabozantinib, nivolumab and ipilimumab versus the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced intermediate- or poor-risk RCC. Patients were randomized 1:1 to the experimental arm of the triplet combination of cabozantinib, nivolumab and ipilimumab or to the control arm of nivolumab and ipilimumab in combination with matched placebo. We announced top-line results from COSMIC-313 in July 2022, and in September 2022 we presented the data at the Presidential Symposium III at the 2022 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress. The trial met its primary endpoint, demonstrating significant improvement in blinded independent radiology committee (BIRC)-assessed PFS at the primary analysis for the triplet combination, reducing the risk of disease progression or death compared with the doublet combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.94; P=0.01). Median PFS for the triplet combination was not reached (95% CI: 14.0-not estimable) versus 11.3 months for the doublet combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab (95% CI: 7.7-18.2). At two prespecified interim analyses for the secondary endpoint of OS, conducted most recently during the third quarter of 2023, the data did not meet the threshold for statistical significance; therefore, the trial continues to the next planned OS analysis, anticipated in 2024. The safety profile observed in the trial was reflective of the known safety profiles for each single agent, as well as the combination regimens used in this study. We plan to discuss a potential regulatory submission with the FDA when the results of the next OS analysis are available, provided such results are supportive. We are sponsoring COSMIC-313, and BMS is providing nivolumab and ipilimumab for the study free of charge.

Combination Studies with Roche

We have also entered into collaborations with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (Roche) for the purpose of evaluating the combination of cabozantinib and Roche’s anti-PD-L1 ICI, atezolizumab, diversifying our exploration of cabozantinib combinations with ICIs.

COSMIC-021 - Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors. In February 2017, we entered into a master clinical supply agreement with Roche. As part of the clinical supply agreement, in June 2017, we initiated COSMIC-021, a large phase 1b study evaluating the safety and tolerability of cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab in patients with a wide variety of locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. We are the trial sponsor of COSMIC-021, and Roche is providing atezolizumab free of charge. The study is divided into two parts: a dose-escalation phase, which was completed in 2018; and an expansion cohort phase, which completed enrollment in January 2022. Enrollment in the expansion phase of this study included 20 combination therapy tumor expansion cohorts in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mCRPC, RCC and various other tumor types.

CONTACT trials. The encouraging efficacy and safety data that emerged from COSMIC-021 have been instrumental in guiding our clinical development strategy for cabozantinib in combination with ICIs. Informed by these data, we entered into a joint clinical research agreement with Roche in December 2019, pursuant to which the parties co-funded and undertook three pivotal phase 3 studies evaluating the combination of cabozantinib and atezolizumab. Two of these trials (each sponsored by Roche) did not meet their respective primary endpoints: CONTACT-01, which evaluated the combination versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic NSCLC previously treated with an ICI and platinum-containing chemotherapy; and CONTACT-03, which evaluated the combination versus monotherapy cabozantinib in patients with inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic RCC who previously received an ICI as their immediate preceding therapy. Detailed findings from CONTACT-01 and CONTACT-03 were presented at the European Lung Cancer Congress in March 2023 and the ASCO Annual Meeting in June 2023, respectively. The third trial, CONTACT-02, is sponsored by us and continues to evaluate the combination in patients with mCRPC as described below. For additional information on the terms of the Roche joint clinical research agreement, see “–Collaborations and Business Development Activities–Cabozantinib Development Collaborations–Roche Collaboration.”

CONTACT-02 - mCRPC. In June 2020, we and Roche initiated CONTACT-02, a global, multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 pivotal trial evaluating cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab versus a second novel hormonal therapy (NHT) (either abiraterone and prednisone or enzalutamide) in patients with mCRPC and measurable extra-pelvic soft-tissue disease who have progressed after treatment with one prior NHT. CONTACT-02 is Informed by positive early-stage results from an mCRPC cohort of COSMIC-021, as well as by COMET-1, our earlier phase 3 trial that evaluated monotherapy cabozantinib in mCRPC. The CONTACT-02 trial enrolled 575 patients at 275 sites globally, and enrollment was completed in the second half of 2023. Patients were randomized 1:1 to the experimental arm of cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab or to the control arm of a second NHT. The two primary efficacy endpoints for CONTACT-02 are BIRC-assessed PFS per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v. 1.1 and OS; key secondary and other efficacy endpoints include ORR, prostate-specific antigen response rate and duration of response (DOR). Both Ipsen and Takeda have opted into and are co-funding the trial, and each will have access to the results to support potential future regulatory submissions in their respective territories outside of the U.S. In August 2023, we announced positive top-line results from CONTACT-02, and detailed findings were presented at the ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium in January 2024. At the primary PFS analysis, conducted in the first 400 randomized patients in the intent-to-treat population and per protocol, the trial met one of two primary endpoints, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in PFS for the combination regimen, reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 35% (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50-0.84; p=0.0007). At a median follow-up of 14.3 months, median PFS was 6.3 months for cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab versus 4.2 months for the control arm. A statistically significant improvement in BIRC-assessed PFS was also observed both in the intent-to-treat population (n=507) and according to the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 evaluation criteria (PCWG3). At a prespecified interim analysis for the primary endpoint of OS, a trend toward improvement of OS was observed; however, the data were immature and did not meet the threshold for statistical significance. Therefore, the trial continues to the next planned OS analysis, anticipated in 2024. The safety profile observed in the trial was reflective of the known safety profiles for each single agent, as well as the combination regimen used in this study. We are discussing a potential regulatory submission with the FDA.

According to the American Cancer Society, in 2024, approximately 299,000 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed in the U.S., and 35,000 people will die from the disease in 2024. Prostate cancer that has spread beyond the prostate and does not respond to androgen-suppression therapies—a common treatment for prostate cancer—is known as mCRPC. Men diagnosed with mCRPC often have a poor prognosis, which has an estimated survival of less than one to two years. We believe that cabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab, if ultimately approved by the FDA for an mCRPC indication, may be a compelling chemotherapy-free treatment option to respond to this significant unmet need.

Trials Conducted through our CRADA with NCI-CTEP and our IST Program

Clinical trials conducted with support from external partners have enabled further expansion of the cabozantinib development program with less burden on our internal development resources. In October 2011, we entered into a CRADA with NCI-CTEP for the clinical development of cabozantinib and have extended its term through October 2026. The CRADA reflects a commitment by NCI-CTEP to provide funding for the broad exploration of cabozantinib’s potential in a wide variety of cancers, each representing a substantial unmet medical need. Investigational New Drug (IND) applications for trials under the CRADA are held by NCI-CTEP. NCI-CTEP also retains rights to any inventions made in whole or in part by NCI-CTEP investigators. However, for inventions that claim the use and/or the composition of cabozantinib, we have an automatic option to elect a worldwide, non-exclusive license to cabozantinib inventions for commercial purposes, with the right to sublicense to affiliates or collaborators working on our behalf, as well as an additional, separate option to negotiate an exclusive license to cabozantinib inventions. Further, before any trial proposed under the CRADA may commence, the protocol is subject to our review and approval. As reflected by the results from completed trials and ongoing clinical trials, we believe our CRADA with NCI-CTEP has facilitated and may continue to facilitate the expansion of the cabozantinib franchise in a cost-efficient manner.

CABINET - NET. The Alliance led the CABINET phase 3 pivotal study under the CRADA that evaluated cabozantinib versus placebo in patients who experienced progression after prior systemic therapy in two independently powered cohorts: one for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) that enrolled 93 patients; and another for extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (epNET, historically referred to as carcinoid tumors) that enrolled 193 patients. Patients in both studies were randomized 2:1 to either the experimental arm of 60 mg cabozantinib daily or placebo, respectively. The primary endpoint for both studies was PFS per RECIST v. 1.1. In August 2023, enrollment into the study was stopped, patients were unblinded and those on placebo were offered treatment with cabozantinib due to dramatic improvements in PFS observed at interim analyses and based upon local investigator assessment. The data from CABINET demonstrated that cabozantinib substantially prolonged the time to disease progression or death in both pNET (HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.14-0.49; P<0.0001) and epNET (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.30-0.66; P<0.0001) cohorts, and that the safety profile of cabozantinib observed in the trial was consistent with its known safety profile. The median PFS for patients who received cabozantinib was 11.4 months for pNET and 8.3 months for epNET versus 3.0 months and 3.2 months, respectively, for patients who received placebo. In addition, the BIRC assessment also determined that cabozantinib substantially prolonged the time to disease progression or death in both pNET (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12-0.54; P<0.0001) and epNET (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.32-0.79; P<0.0001) cohorts. Detailed findings from CABINET were presented during a Proffered Paper Session at the ESMO Congress in October 2023. We are discussing these results with the FDA to support a potential regulatory submission in 2024.

In the U.S., more than 12,000 people are diagnosed with NET each year, and approximately 171,000 people are living with the disease. The number of people diagnosed with NET each year has been increasing. Most NET take years to develop and grow slowly, but some grow quickly. NET can develop in any part of the body as epNET, but most commonly start in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or in the lungs. The five-year survival rates for advanced GI-NET and lung epNET are 68% and 55%, respectively. NET can also start in the pancreas as pNET. While less common, pNET can be more aggressive and the five-year survival rate for advanced pNET is only 23%.

Pipeline Development Programs - Advancing Exelixis’ Future Cancer Therapy Candidates

To continue growing our pipeline, we are investing heavily in the identification, exploration and advancement of new molecules that are clinically differentiated with the potential to improve the standard of care for cancer patients. Several product candidates have progressed into clinical trials, including both small molecules and biotherapeutics that we have discovered or in-licensed and believe have the potential to treat a variety of cancers. Below are summaries of our current and planned clinical development activities outside of the cabozantinib franchise.

Zanzalintinib Development Program

Zanzalintinib is a novel, potent, next-generation oral TKI that targets VEGF receptors, MET and the TAM kinases (TYRO3, AXL and MER) implicated in cancer’s growth and spread, and is our first in-house compound to enter the clinic following our re-initiation of drug discovery activities in 2017. Zanzalintinib has a pharmacokinetic half-life of approximately one day, supporting once-daily dosing, which could translate into a favorable safety profile compared with other VEGF-receptor TKIs. Taken together with the promising anti-tumor activity, we believe zanzalintinib is positioned to be a best-in-class VEGF-receptor TKI in a wide range of solid tumors when used as a monotherapy, as well as in combination regimens. Accordingly, we are evaluating zanzalintinib in a growing development program that builds on our prior experience with cabozantinib, which we believe reduces program risk. We have also established collaborations and will continue to explore additional opportunities for novel combinations with zanzalintinib with the goal of improving standards of care.

STELLAR-001 - Advanced Solid Tumors. STELLAR-001 is a multicenter phase 1b/2 clinical trial evaluating the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability and preliminary anti-tumor activity of zanzalintinib. STELLAR-001 was initiated in 2019 and is divided into dose-escalation and expansion phases designed to evaluate zanzalintinib both as a monotherapy and in combination with atezolizumab in a variety of solid tumors. We previously presented data from STELLAR-001 during poster sessions at the 2022 ESMO Congress, which demonstrated preliminary clinical activity, similar to that observed with cabozantinib, across a range of solid tumors and dose levels, with a manageable safety profile. The phase 2 recommended dose for both monotherapy zanzalintinib and zanzalintinib in combination with atezolizumab was determined to be 100 mg once daily. Enrollment into the STELLAR-001 expansion cohorts for clear cell RCC, non-clear cell RCC, hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, mCRPC and colorectal cancer (CRC) is complete, and we recently presented initial results evaluating monotherapy zanzalintinib in patients with previously treated clear cell RCC during the Oral Abstracts session at the International Kidney Cancer Symposium (IKCS) in November 2023. At a median follow-up time of 8.3 months, the findings demonstrated an ORR of 38% per RECIST v. 1.1 for the entire non-clear cell RCC cohort of 32 patients, including an ORR of 57% among the 14 patients who were not previously treated with cabozantinib; the disease control rate was 88%. The ORR for the 26 patients who had received prior VEGF receptor-TKIs was 35%, including responses in four of the 17 patients (24%) who had received prior cabozantinib. Follow-up continues in this cohort as well as the other completed cohorts, and we continue to be encouraged by zanzalintinib’s emerging safety and efficacy profile, both as a monotherapy and in combination with ICIs.

STELLAR-002 - Advanced Solid Tumors. In December 2021, we initiated STELLAR-002, a multicenter phase 1b/2 clinical trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of zanzalintinib in combination with either nivolumab, nivolumab and ipilimumab, or a fixed-dose combination of nivolumab and relatlimab, a lymphocyte activation gene-3-blocking (LAG-3) antibody developed by BMS. STELLAR-002 is divided into dose-escalation and expansion phases. We have established recommended doses of zanzalintinib for these combination regimens and are exploring them in a diverse array of solid tumor expansion cohorts, including clear cell RCC, non-clear cell RCC, HCC, mCRPC and CRC; patient enrollment into these expansion cohorts is ongoing. The primary efficacy endpoints for the expansion phase are investigator-assessed ORR per RECIST v. 1.1 and OS, and we are also evaluating additional outcomes relevant for particular tumor types in the study. Monotherapy zanzalintinib may also be evaluated to support regulatory requirements for dosing and contribution of components.

STELLAR-009 - Advanced Clear Cell RCC and Other Solid Tumors. In December 2023, we initiated STELLAR-009, an open-label phase 1b/2 trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of zanzalintinib in combination with AB521, an inhibitor of the transcription factor HIF-2⍺ developed by Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (Arcus), in patients with advanced solid tumors, including clear cell RCC. STELLAR-009 is divided into dose-escalation and expansion phases, and patient enrollment into dose-escalation cohorts is ongoing. Efficacy endpoints for the expansion phase will include investigator-assessed ORR, DOR and PFS per RECIST v. 1.1, as well as OS.

STELLAR-303 - CRC. In June 2022, we initiated STELLAR-303, a global, multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 pivotal trial evaluating zanzalintinib in combination with atezolizumab versus regorafenib in patients with metastatic non-microsatellite instability-high or non-mismatch repair-deficient CRC who have progressed after or are intolerant to the current standard of care. The trial aims to enroll approximately 874 patients at approximately 135 sites globally, regardless of RAS status, with approximately 350 of these patients showing no evidence of liver metastases. Patients are being randomized 1:1 to the experimental arm of zanzalintinib in combination with atezolizumab or to the control arm of regorafenib. Under the amended trial protocol, the primary efficacy endpoint for STELLAR-303 is OS in those patients without liver metastases, and the key secondary efficacy endpoint is OS in the full intent-to-treat population. Additional secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed PFS, ORR and DOR per RECIST v. 1.1 in each population.

CRC is the third most common cancer and the third-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the U.S. According to the American Cancer Society, approximately 153,000 new cases will be diagnosed in the U.S. and around 53,000 people will die from the disease in 2024. CRC is most frequently diagnosed among people aged 65-74 and is more common in men and those of African American descent. Nearly a quarter of CRC cases are diagnosed at the metastatic stage, at which point the five-year survival rate is just 15%. It has been estimated that approximately 40-52% of metastatic CRC cases exhibit a RAS mutation.

STELLAR-304 - Non-Clear Cell RCC. In December 2022, we initiated STELLAR-304, a global, multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 pivotal trial evaluating zanzalintinib in combination with nivolumab versus sunitinib in previously untreated patients with advanced non-clear cell RCC. The trial aims to enroll approximately 291 patients at approximately 173 sites globally. Patients are being randomized 2:1 to the experimental arm of zanzalintinib in combination with nivolumab or to the control arm of sunitinib, respectively. The primary efficacy endpoints for STELLAR-304 are BIRC-assessed PFS and ORR per RECIST v 1.1. The secondary efficacy endpoint is OS.

Non-clear cell RCC represents about 25% of RCC cases, with fewer treatment options available and poorer outcomes compared with clear cell RCC.

STELLAR-305 - Squamous Cell Cancers of the Head and Neck (SCCHN). In December 2023, we initiated STELLAR-305, a global, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded phase 2/3 pivotal trial evaluating zanzalintinib in combination with pembrolizumab, an ICI developed by Merck & Co., Inc. (Merck & Co.), versus monotherapy pembrolizumab in patients with previously untreated PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. The trial aims to enroll approximately 500 patients at approximately 215 sites globally. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive zanzalintinib in combination with pembrolizumab or placebo in combination with pembrolizumab. The primary efficacy endpoints for STELLAR-305 are BIRC-assessed PFS per RECIST v. 1.1 and OS. Secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed PFS per RECIST v. 1.1 and ORR and DOR per RECIST v. 1.1 as assessed by both BIRC and the investigator.

SCCHN comprises head and neck cancers that begin in the squamous cells that line the mucosal surfaces of the head and neck. Accounting for about 90% of all head and neck cancers, SCCHN is classified by its location: it can occur in the oral cavity, oropharynx, nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, nasopharynx, larynx or hypopharynx. Approximately 50,000 new cases of SCCHN are diagnosed in the U.S. every year, and SCCHN is more common among men and people over the age of 50. Depending on the site of the cancer and the level of metastases, the five-year survival rate for metastatic SCCHN ranges from 4-35%.

Beyond STELLAR-303, STELLAR-304 and STELLAR-305, we intend to initiate additional early-stage and pivotal trials evaluating zanzalintinib in novel combination regimens across a broad array of future potential indications.

XB002 Development Program

XB002 is our lead TF-targeting ADC program, in-licensed from Iconic Therapeutics, Inc. (Iconic), now a wholly owned subsidiary of Endpoint Health, Inc. XB002 is a next-generation ADC composed of a human mAb against TF that is conjugated to an MTI payload. TF is highly expressed on tumor cells and TF overexpression, while not oncogenic itself, facilitates angiogenesis, metastasis and other processes important to tumor development and progression. After binding to TF on tumor cells, XB002 is internalized, and the MTI payload is released, resulting in targeted tumor cell death. XB002 is a rationally designed next-generation ADC that leverages proprietary linker-payload technology. Based on promising preclinical data, we exercised our exclusive option to license XB002 in December 2020 and assumed responsibility for all subsequent clinical development of XB002. In December 2021, we amended our agreement with Iconic to acquire broad rights to use the anti-TF antibody used in XB002 for any application, including conjugated to other payloads, as well as rights within oncology to a number of other anti-TF antibodies developed by Iconic, including for use in ADCs and multispecific biotherapeutics. For additional information on our business development activities with Iconic, see “—Collaborations and Business Development Activities—Research Collaborations and In-licensing Arrangements—Iconic.”

JEWEL-101 - Advanced Solid Tumors. In June 2021, we initiated JEWEL-101, a multicenter phase 1, open-label clinical trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary anti-tumor activity of XB002 in patients with advanced solid tumors. The trial is divided into dose-escalation and cohort-expansion phases and is enrolling patients with advanced solid tumors, with the primary objective of determining the maximum tolerated dose for intravenous infusion as a single agent and in combination with nivolumab. JEWEL-001 had previously included additional dose-escalation cohorts evaluating the combination of XB002 and bevacizumab, a mAb developed by Roche, but those cohorts have since been discontinued. In October 2022, we announced promising initial dose-escalation results from JEWEL-101 during the Antibody-drug Conjugates Poster Session at the 34th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium (the 2022 ENA Symposium). The data demonstrated that XB002 was well-tolerated at multiple dose levels, and a pharmacokinetic analysis confirmed that XB002 was stable with low levels of free payload. We have initiated the cohort-expansion phase of JEWEL-101 for monotherapy XB002, which is designed to further explore two doses of XB002 in individual tumor cohorts, including NSCLC, SCCHN, cervical cancer and ovarian cancer. Additional cohorts being evaluated with monotherapy XB002 include endometrial cancer, pancreatic cancer, esophageal cancer, mCRPC, triple negative breast cancer and hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, as well as a TF-expressing tumor-agnostic cohort. The primary efficacy endpoint for the expansion phase is investigator-assessed ORR per RECIST v. 1.1. We are continuing to enroll patients in combination dose-escalation cohorts with nivolumab and will explore the combination potential with zanzalintinib. Additional expansion cohorts are planned for evaluating these various combinations as part of our goal to advance XB002 into full development. We intend to evaluate the potential of XB002 as monotherapy and in combination with other therapies across a wide range of tumor types, including indications other than those currently addressed by commercially available TF-targeting therapies.

XL309 Development Program

In September 2023, we entered into an exclusive global license agreement with Insilico Medicine US, Inc. and its affiliate, Insilico Medicine Hong Kong Limited, along with their parent company and certain other affiliated entities (individually and collectively referred to as Insilico). The agreement with Insilico grants us global rights to develop and commercialize XL309 (formerly ISM3091), a potentially best-in-class small molecule inhibitor of USP1, which has emerged as a synthetic lethal target in the context of BRCA-mutated tumors. The FDA cleared the initial IND for XL309 for the treatment of patients with solid tumors in April 2023. XL309 is currently being evaluated in a phase 1 clinical trial to explore its pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability and preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, and enrollment is ongoing. Our priorities for XL309 include accelerating its development as a potential therapy for tumors that have become refractory to PARP inhibitors (PARPi), including forms of ovarian, breast and prostate cancers, pursuing potential PARPi combination regimens, and potentially moving beyond the PARPi market into new patient populations. For more information on the Insilico license agreement, see “—Collaborations and Business Development Activities—Research Collaborations and In-licensing Arrangements—Insilico.”

ADU-1805 Development Program

In November 2022, we executed an exclusive option and license agreement and clinical development collaboration with Sairopa B.V. (Sairopa) providing us with the right to exclusively in-license ADU-1805, a clinical-stage and potentially best-in-class mAb developed by Sairopa that targets SIRPα. In February 2023, the FDA cleared the initial IND for ADU-1805 to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of ADU-1805 in adults with advanced solid tumors. ADU-1805 is currently being evaluated in a phase 1 clinical trial to explore its pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability and preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. The ADU-1805 study includes future plans to investigate the compound’s potential in combination with approved ICIs. For more information on the Sairopa option arrangement, see “—Collaborations and Business Development Activities—Research Collaborations and In-licensing Arrangements—Sairopa.”

XL102 Development Program and QUARTZ-101 (Advanced Solid Tumors)

XL102 (formerly AUR102) is a potent, selective, irreversible and orally bioavailable covalent inhibitor of CDK7 (an important regulator of the cellular transcriptional and cell cycle machinery) discovered by Aurigene Oncology, Ltd. (Aurigene). We exercised our exclusive option to license XL102 in December 2020 pursuant to our collaboration with Aurigene, assuming responsibility for all subsequent clinical development of XL102. In January 2021, we initiated QUARTZ-101, a multicenter phase 1, open-label clinical trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary anti-tumor activity of XL102, both as a single agent and in combination with other anti-cancer therapies, in patients with inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Based on initial findings from QUARTZ-101 and research into potential formulations of XL102, we have discontinued development of XL102 as of November 2023.

CBX-12 Development Program

In November 2022, we executed an exclusive collaboration agreement with Cybrexa Therapeutics, LLC (Cybrexa) providing us with the right to acquire CBX-12 (alphalexTM exatecan), a clinical-stage, first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes Cybrexa’s proprietary alphalex technology to enhance delivery of exatecan, a highly potent, second-generation topoisomerase I inhibitor, to tumor cells. CBX-12 is currently being evaluated in a phase 1 clinical trial to explore its pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability and preliminary anti-tumor activity at various doses and schedules in patients with advanced or metastatic refractory solid tumors. We elected to terminate our collaboration with Cybrexa in January 2024 and subsequently relinquished all rights with respect to CBX-12.

A complete listing of all ongoing trials can be found at www.ClinicalTrials.gov.

Expansion of the Exelixis Pipeline

Increasing the number of novel anti-cancer agents in our pipeline is essential to our overall strategy and business goals. We are working to expand our oncology product pipeline through drug discovery efforts, which encompass our diverse biotherapeutics and small molecule programs exploring multiple modalities and mechanisms of action. This approach provides a high degree of flexibility with respect to target selection and allows us to prioritize those targets that we believe have the greatest chance of yielding impactful therapeutics. As part of our strategy, our drug discovery activities have included and continue to include research collaborations, in-licensing arrangements and other strategic transactions that collectively incorporate a wide range of technology platforms and assets and increase our probability of success. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we expect to progress two new development candidates into preclinical development during 2024. We will continue to engage in pipeline expansion initiatives with the goal of acquiring and in-licensing promising investigational oncology assets and then further characterize and develop them utilizing our established preclinical and clinical development infrastructure.

Biotherapeutics Programs

We are advancing a variety of biotherapeutics that have the potential to become anti-cancer therapies, including bispecific antibodies and ADCs. ADCs in particular present a unique opportunity for new cancer treatments, given their capabilities to deliver anti-cancer drug payloads to targets with increased precision while minimizing impact on healthy tissues. This approach has been validated by multiple regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of ADCs in the past several years. To facilitate the growth of our various biotherapeutics programs, we have established multiple research collaborations and in-licensing arrangements and entered into other strategic transactions, aimed at conserving capital and managing risks, that provide us with access to antibodies, binders, payloads and conjugation technologies, which are the components employed to generate next-generation ADCs or multispecific antibodies. In addition to the option deal with Sairopa, some of our active research collaborations for biotherapeutics programs include collaborations with:

•Adagene Inc. (Adagene), which is focused on using Adagene’s SAFEbody TM technology to develop novel masked ADCs or other innovative biotherapeutics with potential for improved therapeutic index;

•Catalent, Inc.’s wholly owned subsidiaries Redwood Bioscience, Inc., R.P. Scherer Technologies, LLC and Catalent Pharma Solutions, Inc. (individually and collectively referred to as Catalent), which is focused on the discovery and development of multiple ADCs using Catalent’s proprietary SMARTag® site-specific bioconjugation technology; and

•Invenra, Inc. (Invenra), which is focused on the discovery and development of novel binders and multispecific antibodies for the treatment of cancer.

We have made significant progress under these and other research collaborations and in-licensing arrangements and believe we will continue to do so in 2024 and future years. For example, based on promising preclinical data for XB002, we exercised our exclusive option to license XB002 from Iconic in December 2020 and initiated the JEWEL-101 phase 1 clinical trial in June 2021. For additional information on JEWEL-101 and our development plans for XB002, see “—Exelixis Development Programs—Pipeline Development Programs - Advancing Exelixis’ Future Cancer Therapy Candidates—XB002 Development Program.” Also, as a direct result of these arrangements, we are advancing five biotherapeutics development candidates toward potential IND filings in 2024, 2025, and 2026: XB010, XB628, XB371, XB064, and XB033. XB010, our first ADC advanced internally, targets the tumor antigen 5T4 and incorporates an antibody sourced from Invenra and was constructed using Catalent’s SMARTag site-specific bioconjugation platform. XB628 is a bispecific antibody that targets PD-L1 and natural killer cell receptor group 2A (NKG2A), identified as key regulators of natural killer cell activity, and was discovered, in part, in collaboration with Invenra. XB371 is a next-generation TF-targeting ADC that is differentiated from XB002 by its topoisomerase inhibitor payload, and was discovered, in part, in collaboration with Catalent.

XB064 is a high-affinity mAb that targets immunoglobin-like transcript 2 (ILT2), which is associated with resistance to PD-1 pathway inhibitors, with potential to combine broadly with our internal pipeline and approved immunotherapy agents, and was discovered, in part, in collaboration with Invenra. XB033 is an ADC targeting the tumor antigen IL13Ra2, and was discovered, in part, in collaboration with Invenra and Catalent. In December 2023, we announced that we had discontinued our preclinical development program for XB014, a bispecific antibody combining a PD-L1 targeting arm with a CD47 targeting arm to block a macrophage checkpoint, and was discovered, in part, in collaboration with Invenra. For additional information on these specific research collaborations and in-licensing arrangements related to our biotherapeutics programs, see “—Collaborations and Business Development Activities—Research Collaborations and In-licensing Arrangements.”

Small Molecule Programs

Since its formation in 2000, our drug discovery group has advanced over 25 compounds to the IND-stage, either independently or with collaboration partners, and today we deploy our drug discovery expertise to advance small molecule programs toward and through preclinical development. These efforts are led by our experienced scientists, including some of the same scientists who led the efforts to discover cabozantinib, cobimetinib and esaxerenone, each of which are now commercially distributed drug products. The furthest along of our internally-discovered small molecule product candidates is zanzalintinib, which is now being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials. We are also advancing a small molecule development candidate, XL495, toward a potential IND filing in 2024. XL495 is an inhibitor of protein kinase membrane associated tyrosine/threonine 1 (PKMYT1) with best-in-class potential to treat solid tumors due to its improved selectivity and pharmacokinetics. In addition, we augment our small molecule discovery activities through research collaborations and in-licensing arrangements with other companies engaged in small molecule discovery. Most recently, in September 2023, we entered into an exclusive global license agreement with Insilico, granting us global rights to develop and commercialize XL309, a potentially best-in-class small molecule inhibitor of USP1, which has emerged as a synthetic lethal target in the context of BRCA-mutated tumors. In April 2023, the FDA cleared the initial IND for XL309 for the treatment of patients with solid tumors. For additional information on our development plans for XL309, see “Business—Exelixis Development Programs—Pipeline Development Programs – Advancing Exelixis’ Future Cancer Therapy Candidates—XL309 Development Program” in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and for additional information on our research collaborations and in-licensing arrangements related to our small molecule programs, see “—Collaborations and Business Development Activities—Research Collaborations and In-licensing Arrangements.” We also continue to make progress on multiple lead optimization programs for inhibitors of a variety of targets that we believe play significant roles in tumor growth, and we anticipate that some of these other programs could reach development candidate status in 2024 and beyond.

Collaborations and Business Development Activities

We have established multiple collaborations with leading biopharmaceutical companies for the commercialization and further development of the cabozantinib franchise. Additionally, we have made considerable progress under our existing research collaborations and in-licensing arrangements to further enhance our early-stage pipeline and expand our ability to discover, develop and commercialize novel therapies with the goal of providing new treatment options for cancer patients and their physicians. We expect to enter into additional, external collaborative relationships around assets and technologies that complement our drug discovery and clinical development efforts. Under our commercial collaborations, we are entitled to receive milestones and royalties or, in the case of cobimetinib, royalties from sales outside the U.S. and a share of profits (or losses) from commercialization in the U.S. Under our research collaborations and in-licensing arrangements, we are obligated to pay milestones and royalties to our various partners.

Cabozantinib Commercial Collaborations

Ipsen Collaboration

In February 2016, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Ipsen for the commercialization and further development of cabozantinib. Under the collaboration agreement, Ipsen received exclusive commercialization rights for current and potential future cabozantinib indications outside of the U.S., Canada and Japan. The collaboration agreement has been subsequently amended on multiple occasions, including in December 2016 to include commercialization rights in Canada. We have also agreed to collaborate with Ipsen on the development of cabozantinib for current and potential future indications. The parties’ efforts are governed through a joint steering committee and appropriate subcommittees established to guide and oversee the collaboration’s operation and strategic direction; provided, however, that we retain final decision-making authority with respect to cabozantinib’s ongoing development.

In consideration for the exclusive license and other rights contained in the collaboration agreement, including commercialization rights in Canada, Ipsen paid us aggregate upfront payments of $210.0 million in 2016. As of December 31, 2023, we achieved aggregate milestone payments of $489.5 million related to regulatory and commercial progress by Ipsen since the inception of the collaboration agreement.

We are also eligible to receive future development and regulatory milestone payments from Ipsen, totaling an aggregate of $19.5 million upon additional approvals of cabozantinib in future indications and/or jurisdictions, as well as contingent payments of up to $350.0 million and CAD$26.5 million associated with future sales milestones. We will further receive royalties on net sales of cabozantinib by Ipsen outside of the U.S. and Japan.

We are entitled to receive a tiered royalty of 22% to 26% on annual net sales, with separate tiers for Canada; these 22% to 26% royalty tiers reset each calendar year. As of December 31, 2023, we have earned royalties of $517.9 million on net sales of cabozantinib by Ipsen since the inception of the collaboration agreement.

We received notification that, effective January 1, 2021, Royalty Pharma plc (Royalty Pharma) acquired from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) all rights, title and interest in royalties on total net sales of any product containing cabozantinib for non-U.S. markets for the full term of the royalty and for the U.S. market through September 2026, after which time U.S. royalties will revert back to GSK. Accordingly, andconsistent with our historical agreement with GSK, we are required to pay a 3% royalty to Royalty Pharma on total net sales of any product containing cabozantinib, including net sales by Ipsen.

We are responsible for funding cabozantinib-related development costs for those trials in existence at the time we entered into the collaboration agreement with Ipsen; global development costs for additional trials are shared between the parties, with Ipsen reimbursing us for 35% of such costs, provided Ipsen chooses to opt into such trials. In accordance with the collaboration agreement, Ipsen has opted into and is co-funding certain clinical trials, including: CheckMate -9ER, COSMIC-021, COSMIC-311, COSMIC-312, CONTACT-01 and CONTACT-02.

We remain responsible for manufacturing and supply of cabozantinib for all development and commercialization activities under the collaboration agreement. Relatedly, we entered into a supply agreement with Ipsen to supply finished and labeled drug product for distribution in the territories outside of the U.S. and Japan for the term of the collaboration agreement as well as a quality agreement that provides respective quality responsibilities for the aforementioned supply. Furthermore, at the time we entered into the collaboration agreement, the parties also entered into a pharmacovigilance agreement, which defines each partner’s responsibilities for safety reporting. The pharmacovigilance agreement also requires us to maintain the global safety database for cabozantinib. To meet our obligations to regulatory authorities for the reporting of safety data from territories outside of the U.S. and Japan from sources other than our sponsored global clinical development trials, we rely on data collected and reported to us by Ipsen.

Unless earlier terminated, the collaboration agreement has a term that continues, on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis, until the latter of (1) the expiration of patent claims related to cabozantinib, (2) the expiration of regulatory exclusivity covering cabozantinib or (3) ten years after the first commercial sale of cabozantinib, other than COMETRIQ. The supply agreement will continue in effect until expiration or termination of the collaboration agreement. The collaboration agreement may be terminated for cause by either party based on uncured material breach of either the collaboration agreement or the supply agreement by the other party, bankruptcy of the other party or for safety reasons. We may terminate the collaboration agreement if Ipsen challenges or opposes any patent covered by the collaboration agreement. Ipsen may terminate the collaboration agreement if the FDA or European Medicines Agency (EMA) orders or requires substantially all cabozantinib clinical trials to be terminated. Ipsen also has the right to terminate the collaboration agreement on a region-by-region basis after the first commercial sale of cabozantinib in advanced RCC in the given region. Upon termination by either party, all licenses granted by us to Ipsen will automatically terminate, and, except in the event of a termination by Ipsen for our material breach, the licenses granted by Ipsen to us shall survive such termination and shall automatically become worldwide, or, if Ipsen were to terminate only for a particular region, then for the terminated region. Following termination by us for Ipsen’s material breach, or termination by Ipsen without cause or because we undergo a change of control by a party engaged in a competing program, Ipsen is prohibited from competing with us for a period of time.

Takeda Collaboration

In January 2017, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Takeda, as subsequently amended to, among other things, modify the amount of reimbursements we receive for costs associated with our required pharmacovigilance activities and milestones we are eligible to receive, as well as modify certain cost sharing obligations related to the Japan-specific development costs associated with CONTACT-01 and CONTACT-02. Under the collaboration agreement, Takeda has exclusive commercialization rights for current and potential future cabozantinib indications in Japan, and the parties have agreed to collaborate on the clinical development of cabozantinib in Japan. The operation and strategic direction of the parties’ collaboration is governed through a joint executive committee and appropriate subcommittees.

In consideration for the exclusive license and other rights contained in the collaboration agreement, we received an upfront payment of $50.0 million from Takeda in 2017. As of December 31, 2023, we have also achieved aggregate milestone payments of $138.0 million related to regulatory and commercial progress by Takeda since the inception of the collaboration agreement, including one commercial milestone payment during 2023 for $11.0 million upon Takeda’s achievement of $150.0 million of cumulative net sales of cabozantinib in Japan. We are eligible to receive additional regulatory and development milestone payments, without limit, for additional potential future indications.

We are further eligible to receive commercial milestones, including milestone payments earned for the first commercial sale of a product of $108.0 million. We also receive royalties on the net sales of cabozantinib in Japan. We are entitled to receive a tiered royalty of 15% to 24% on the initial $300.0 million of net sales, and following this initial $300.0 million of net sales, we are then entitled to receive a tiered royalty of 20% to 30% on annual net sales thereafter; these 20% to 30% royalty tiers reset each calendar year. As of December 31, 2023, we have earned royalties of $34.2 million on net sales of cabozantinib by Takeda since the inception of the collaboration agreement.

Consistent with our historical agreement with GSK, we are required to pay a 3% royalty to Royalty Pharma on total net sales of any product containing cabozantinib, including net sales by Takeda.

Except for CONTACT-01 and CONTACT-02, Takeda is responsible for 20% of the costs associated with the cabozantinib development plan’s current and future trials, provided Takeda opts into such trials, and 100% of costs associated with the cabozantinib development activities that are exclusively for the benefit of Japan. In accordance with the collaboration agreement, Takeda has opted into and is co-funding certain clinical trials, including: CheckMate -9ER; certain cohorts of COSMIC-021; CONTACT-01; and CONTACT-02.

Under the collaboration agreement, we are responsible for the manufacturing and supply of cabozantinib for all development and commercialization activities under the collaboration agreement. Relatedly, we entered into a clinical supply agreement covering the supply of cabozantinib to Takeda for the term of the collaboration agreement, as well as a quality agreement that provides respective quality responsibilities for the aforementioned supply. Furthermore, at the time we entered into the collaboration agreement, the parties also entered into a safety data exchange agreement, which defines each partner’s responsibility for safety reporting. This agreement also requires us to maintain the global safety database for cabozantinib. To meet our obligations to regulatory authorities for the reporting of safety data from Japan from sources other than our sponsored global clinical development trials, we rely on data collected and reported to us by Takeda.

Unless earlier terminated, the collaboration agreement has a term that continues, on a product-by-product basis, until the earlier of (1) two years after first generic entry with respect to such product in Japan or (2) the later of (A) the expiration of patent claims related to cabozantinib and (B) the expiration of regulatory exclusivity covering cabozantinib in Japan. The collaboration agreement may be terminated for cause by either party based on uncured material breach by the other party, bankruptcy of the other party or for safety reasons. We may terminate the agreement if Takeda challenges or opposes any patent covered by the collaboration agreement. After the commercial launch of cabozantinib in Japan, Takeda may terminate the collaboration agreement upon twelve months’ prior written notice following the third anniversary of the first commercial sale of cabozantinib in Japan. Upon termination by either party, all licenses granted by us to Takeda will automatically terminate, and the licenses granted by Takeda to us shall survive such termination and shall automatically become worldwide.

Cabozantinib Development Collaborations

BMS Collaboration

In February 2017, we entered into a clinical trial collaboration agreement with BMS for the purpose of exploring the therapeutic potential of cabozantinib in combination with BMS’s ICIs, nivolumab and/or ipilimumab, to treat a variety of types of cancer. As part of the collaboration, we are evaluating the triplet combination of cabozantinib, nivolumab and ipilimumab as a treatment option for RCC in the COSMIC-313 trial. For a description of the COSMIC-313 trial, see “—Exelixis Development Programs—Cabozantinib Development Program—Combination Studies with BMS.”

Under the collaboration agreement with BMS, each party granted to the other a non-exclusive, worldwide (within the collaboration territory as defined in the collaboration agreement and its supplemental agreements), non-transferable, royalty-free license to use the other party’s compounds in the conduct of each clinical trial. The parties’ efforts are governed through a joint development committee established to guide and oversee the collaboration’s operation. Each trial is conducted under a combination IND application, unless otherwise required by a regulatory authority. Each party is responsible for supplying finished drug product for the applicable clinical trial, and responsibility for the payment of costs for each such trial will be determined on a trial-by-trial basis. Following the FDA’s approval of CABOMETYX in combination with nivolumab as a first-line treatment of patients with advanced RCC, we and BMS commenced the commercial launch of the combination and have agreed to pursue commercialization and marketing efforts independently.

Roche Collaboration

In February 2017, we entered into a master clinical supply agreement with Roche for the purpose of evaluating cabozantinib and Roche’s ICI, atezolizumab, in locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Under this agreement with Roche, in June 2017, we initiated COSMIC-021 and in December 2018, we initiated COSMIC-312. We were the sponsor of both trials, and Roche provided atezolizumab free of charge. Building upon encouraging clinical activity observed in COSMIC-021, in December 2019 we entered into a joint clinical research agreement with Roche for the purpose of further evaluating the combination of cabozantinib with atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including in the CONTACT-01, CONTACT-02 and CONTACT-03 studies. If a party to the joint clinical research agreement proposes any additional combined therapy trials beyond any ongoing phase 3 pivotal trials, the joint clinical research agreement provides that such proposing party must notify the other party and that if agreed to, any such additional combined therapy trial will become part of the collaboration, or if not agreed to, the proposing party may conduct such additional combined therapy trial independently, subject to specified restrictions set forth in the joint clinical research agreement.

Under the joint clinical research agreement, each party granted to the other a non-exclusive, worldwide (excluding, in our case, territory already the subject of a license by us to Takeda), non-transferable, royalty-free license, with a right to sublicense (subject to limitations), to use the other party’s intellectual property and compounds solely as necessary for the party to perform its obligations under the joint clinical research agreement. The parties’ efforts are governed through a joint steering committee established to guide and oversee the collaboration and the conduct of the combined therapy trials. Each party is responsible for providing clinical supply for all combined therapy trials, and the cost of the supply will be borne by such party. The clinical trial expenses for each combined therapy trial agreed to be conducted jointly under the joint clinical research agreement are shared equally between the parties, and the clinical trial expenses for each additional combined therapy trial not agreed to be conducted jointly under the joint clinical research agreement are borne by the proposing party, except that the cost of clinical supply for all combined therapy trials are borne by the party that owns the applicable product.

Unless earlier terminated, the joint clinical research agreement provides that it will remain in effect until the completion of all combined therapy trials under the collaboration, the delivery of all related trial data to both parties, and the completion of any then agreed-upon additional analyses. The joint clinical research agreement may be terminated for cause by either party based on any uncured material breach by the other party, bankruptcy of the other party or for safety reasons. Upon termination by either party, the licenses granted to each party will terminate upon completion of any ongoing activities under the joint clinical research agreement.

Zanzalintinib Clinical Collaborations

To diversify our exploration of the therapeutic potential of zanzalintinib, we have also entered into multiple collaboration and supply agreements to evaluate zanzalintinib in various combination trials, including with Roche’s atezolizumab, BMS’ nivolumab, ipilimumab and relatlimab, and Arcus’ AB521. These agreements facilitate the efficient exploration of the safety and efficacy of zanzalintinib in combinations with a variety of established cancer therapies as we continue to build a broad development program for zanzalintinib. For descriptions of our ongoing clinical trials evaluating zanzalintinib in combination with other therapies, see “—Exelixis Development Programs—Pipeline Development Programs - Advancing Exelixis’ Future Cancer Therapy Candidates—Zanzalintinib Development Program.”

Research Collaborations and In-licensing Arrangements

As part of our pipeline expansion efforts, we have entered several research collaborations and in-licensing arrangements, as well other strategic transactions that collectively incorporate a wide range of technology platforms and assets and increase our probability of success. More recently, we have focused our business development activities on late preclinical and early-stage clinical assets that align with our oncology drug development, regulatory and commercial expertise, and that have immediate potential as product candidates to treat cancer patients, including the following:

•Sairopa. In November 2022, we entered into an exclusive option and license agreement and clinical development collaboration with Sairopa to develop ADU-1805. The collaboration is intended to expand our clinical pipeline to explore the applicability of ADU-1805 across multiple tumor types, as well as the potential to combine ADU-1805 with zanzalintinib and approved ICIs. Under the agreement, we made an upfront payment to Sairopa, including additional payments for near-term milestones, in exchange for an option to obtain an exclusive, worldwide license to develop and commercialize ADU-1805 and other anti-SIRPα antibodies, and for certain expenses to be incurred by Sairopa in conducting prespecified phase 1 clinical studies of ADU-1805 during the option period. Sairopa is eligible to receive additional development milestone payments during the option period. Following the completion of the prespecified clinical studies, we have the right to exercise our option upon payment of an option exercise fee. Upon option exercise, Sairopa will be eligible to receive additional development and commercial milestone payments, as well as royalties on potential sales.

•Insilico. In September 2023, we entered into an exclusive global license agreement with Insilico. Under the agreement, Insilico granted us global rights to develop and commercialize XL309, a clinical-stage and potentially best-in-class small molecule inhibitor of USP1, which has emerged as a synthetic lethal target in the context of BRCA-mutated tumors, and other USP1-targeting compounds, in exchange for an upfront payment to Insilico of $80 million. Insilico is also eligible to receive future development, commercial, and sales-based milestone payments, as well as tiered royalties on net sales. In the fourth quarter of 2023, we completed the transfer of stewardship of the ongoing phase 1 clinical trial evaluating XL309 from Insilico to us.

We continue to make progress on our various research collaborations and in-licensing arrangements focused on our early-stage pipeline with the goal of advancing new candidates toward the clinic, including the following:

•Catalent. In September 2020, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Catalent to develop multiple ADCs using Catalent’s proprietary SMARTag site-specific bioconjugation technology. Under the September 2020 agreement, we made an upfront payment in exchange for an exclusive option to license up to four targets using Catalent’s ADC platform over a three-year period. In addition, in August 2022 we exercised our right to extend the target selection term to five years and nominate up to two additional targets for an additional payment. For each option we decide to exercise, we will be required to pay an exercise fee, and we would then assume responsibility for all subsequent clinical development, manufacturing and commercialization for that program. Catalent would then become eligible for potential development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments, as well as royalties on potential sales. We have also committed to contribute research funding to Catalent for discovery and preclinical development work. In November 2022, we entered into a separate license agreement with Catalent for three target programs with lead antibody and/or ADC candidates. The ADC candidates were developed using Catalent’s SMARTag technology, and each of the licensed antibodies has potential for development as an ADC or other biologic therapy using a variety of technologies to which we have access through our partnership network. Under the November 2022 agreement, we made an upfront payment in exchange for rights to the three biotherapeutics programs. We will fund the development work conducted by Catalent until development candidate selection is complete, after which we will assume responsibility for all subsequent preclinical, clinical and commercial activities. Catalent will be eligible for potential development and commercial milestone payments, as well as royalties on potential sales.

•Adagene. In February 2021, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Adagene to utilize Adagene’s SAFEbody technology platform to generate masked versions of mAbs from our growing preclinical pipeline for the development of ADCs or other innovative biotherapeutics against Exelixis-nominated targets. Under the agreement, we made an upfront payment in exchange for an exclusive, worldwide license to develop and commercialize any potential ADC products generated by Adagene with respect to an initial target, as well as a second target we may nominate during the collaboration term. For each target that we nominate, we would then assume responsibility for all subsequent clinical development, manufacturing and commercialization for that program. Adagene is eligible for potential development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments, as well as royalties on potential sales.

•Iconic. In May 2019, we entered into an exclusive option and license agreement with Iconic to advance an innovative next-generation ADC program for cancer, leveraging Iconic’s expertise in targeting TF in solid tumors. Under the original May 2019 agreement, we gained an exclusive option to license XB002, Iconic’s lead TF-targeting ADC program, in exchange for an upfront payment to Iconic and a commitment for preclinical development funding. Based on encouraging preclinical data, we exercised our exclusive option to license XB002 in December 2020, resulting in our assuming responsibility for all subsequent clinical development, manufacturing and commercialization for XB002 and payment of an option exercise fee to Iconic. Following the FDA’s acceptance of our IND for XB002 in April 2021, we initiated a phase 1 clinical trial of XB002 in June 2021 designed to evaluate its pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy as a monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. For additional information on XB002, see “—Exelixis Development Programs—Pipeline Development Programs - Advancing Exelixis’ Future Cancer Therapy Candidates—XB002 Development Program.” In January 2022, we announced an amendment to our agreement with Iconic, which we entered into in December 2021, to acquire broad rights to use the anti-TF antibody used in XB002 for any application, including conjugated to other payloads, as well as rights within oncology to a number of other anti-TF antibodies developed by Iconic, including for use in ADCs and multispecific biotherapeutics. Under the amended agreement, we made a final payment to Iconic and will not owe Iconic any further payments, but we will continue to be responsible for milestone payments and royalties owed to other companies pursuant to prior agreements between Iconic and those companies.

•Invenra. In May 2018, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Invenra to discover and develop multispecific antibodies for the treatment of cancer. Invenra is responsible for antibody lead discovery and generation while we will lead IND-enabling studies, manufacturing, clinical development in single-agent and combination therapy regimens, and future regulatory and commercialization activities. The collaboration agreement provides that we will receive an exclusive, worldwide license to one preclinical, multispecific antibody asset, and that we will pursue multiple additional discovery projects across three different programs during the term of the collaboration. In October 2019, we expanded our collaboration to include the development of novel binders against six additional targets, which we can use to generate multispecific antibodies based on Invenra’s B-Body TM technology platform, or with other platforms and formats at our option. We amended the agreement again in March 2020 and January 2021 to enable the use of target binders in non-Invenra platform-based modalities, such as ADC platforms, and to enable the development of biparatopic antibodies, respectively. Then in August 2021, we further expanded our collaboration to include up to 20 additional targets for biotherapeutics discovery and development, for which we agreed to pay Invenra exclusivity payments and research program funding over a three-year period. Under the collaboration, Invenra is eligible for project initiation fees and potential development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments, as well as tiered royalties on net sales of any approved products. We also have the right to exercise options with respect to certain of Invenra’s other research programs in exchange for an option exercise payment, and Invenra is eligible for milestone payments and royalties for any products that arise from these optioned research programs.

In order to prioritize the advancement of our deep pipeline of clinical and near-clinical programs, we are rebalancing our investment priorities and research and development resources toward our product development activities. Accordingly, we elected to terminate certain of our research collaborations, in-licensing and other arrangements in January 2024:

•Aurigene, which was focused on the discovery and development of novel small molecules as therapies for cancer, and included our discontinued programs for XL102 and XL114;

•BioInvent International AB (BioInvent), which was intended to expand our portfolio of antibody-based therapies and utilizes BioInvent’s proprietary n-CoDeR® antibody library and patient-centric F.I.R.S.T™ screening platform, which together are designed to allow for parallel target and antibody discovery;

•Cybrexa, which was focused on the development of CBX-12 (including our right to acquire CBX-12);

•NBE-Therapeutics AG (NBE), which was focused on the discovery and development of multiple ADCs by leveraging NBE’s unique expertise and proprietary platforms in ADC discovery, including NBE’s SMAC-Technology™ (a site-specific conjugation technology) and novel payloads; and

•STORM Therapeutics LTD, which was focused on the discovery and development of inhibitors of novel RNA modifying enzymes, including ADAR1.

The terminations for these agreements will be effective in April 2024.

Other Collaborations

Prior to the commercialization of our first product, COMETRIQ, our primary business strategy was focused on the development and out-licensing of innovative drug candidate compounds to pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies under collaboration agreements that allowed us to retain economic participation in the asset and support additional development of our proprietary products. Our collaboration agreements with Genentech and Daiichi Sankyo are representative of this historical strategy. Under our collaboration agreement with Genentech we out-licensed the further development and commercialization of COTELLIC, and under our collaboration agreement with Daiichi Sankyo we granted Daiichi Sankyo an exclusive, worldwide license to certain intellectual property, including MINNEBRO. We have since evolved and are now a fully integrated biopharmaceutical company focused on driving the expansion and depth of our product offerings through the continued development of the cabozantinib franchise and drug discovery efforts. While these historical collaboration agreements have the potential to provide future revenue, and while we have received some collaboration revenues from these arrangements, we do not expect to receive significant revenues from these historical collaboration agreements.

Manufacturing and Product Supply

We do not operate our own current Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) manufacturing or distribution facilities for chemistry, manufacturing and control (CMC) development activities, preclinical, clinical or commercial production and distribution for our current products and new product candidates. Instead, we mostly rely on various third-party contract manufacturing organizations to conduct these operations on our behalf. As our operations continue to grow in these areas, we are expanding internal CMC development laboratories to augment our external network focusing on our product candidates. We expect this to enable us to maximize application of our internal expertise and scientific know-how and advance our product candidates more efficiently and with greater technical precision, speed, agility and quality, while working in close collaboration with our expanding external manufacturing and supply chain network. This external network consists of well-established and reputable global third-party GMP contract manufacturers for our CMC development and manufacturing that have good regulatory standing, suitable manufacturing capacities and capabilities. We anticipate that this network will meet our future commercial manufacturing and supply needs for our product candidates currently in development, should such programs advance to regulatory approval and subsequent commercialization. These third parties must comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, including the FDA’s current GMP, the EC’s Guidelines on Good Distribution Practice (GDP), as well as other stringent regulatory requirements enforced by the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies, as applicable, and are subject to routine inspections by such regulatory agencies. In addition, through our third-party contract manufacturers and data service providers, we continue to provide serialized commercial products as required to comply with the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) and its foreign equivalents where applicable.

Specifically with respect to CABOMETYX, we entered into agreements with secondary contract manufacturing organizations to produce additional commercial supplies of CABOMETYX tablets and cabozantinib drug substance, which bolsters our commercial supply chain and serves to mitigate the risk of supply chain interruptions or other failures.

We continually monitor and evaluate the performance of our third-party contract manufacturers on an ongoing basis for compliance with these requirements and to affirm their continuing capabilities to meet both our commercial and clinical needs. We also have contracted with a third-party logistics provider, with multiple distribution locations, to provide shipping and warehousing services for our commercial supply of both CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ in the U.S. We employ highly skilled personnel with both technical and manufacturing experience to diligently manage the activities at our third-party contract manufacturers and other supply chain partners, and our quality department audits them on a periodic basis.

We source raw materials that are used to manufacture our drug substance from multiple third-party suppliers in Asia, Europe and North America. Where appropriate, we stock sufficient quantities of these materials and provide them to our third-party drug substance contract manufacturers so they can manufacture adequate drug substance quantities per our requirements, for both clinical and commercial purposes. We then store drug substance at third-party facilities and provide appropriate amounts to our third-party drug product contract manufacturers, who then manufacture, package and label our specified quantities of finished goods for COMETRIQ and CABOMETYX, respectively. In addition, we rely on our third-party contract manufacturers to source materials such as excipients, components and reagents, which are required to manufacture our drug substance and finished drug product.

In addition to having expanded our commercial supply chain to include secondary contract manufacturing organizations, we have established and continue to maintain substantial safety stock inventories for our drug substance and drug products, and we store these quantities in multiple locations. The quantities that we store are based on our business needs and take into account forecasts of global market demand, production lead times, potential supply interruptions and shelf life for our drug substance and drug products. We have not experienced significant production delays or seen significant impairment to our supply chain as a result of the ongoing hostilities in Eastern Europe and the Middle East or other global events. We believe that our current manufacturing network has the appropriate capacity to produce sufficient commercial quantities of CABOMETYX to support the currently approved RCC, HCC and DTC indications, and also potential additional indications if trials evaluating CABOMETYX in those indications prove to be successful and gain regulatory approval in the future. Our manufacturing footprint also enables us to fulfill our supply obligations for our products and product candidates to our collaboration partners for global commercial and development purposes.

Marketing and Sales

We have a fully integrated commercial team consisting of sales, marketing, market access, and commercial operations functions. Our sales team promotes CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ in the U.S. We market our products in the U.S. and concentrate our efforts on oncologists, oncology nurses, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals. In addition to using customary in-person pharmaceutical company practices, we also utilize digital marketing technologies to expand our engagement opportunities with customers.

Our commercial products, CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ, are sold initially through wholesale distribution and specialty pharmacy channels and then, if applicable, resold to hospitals and other organizations that provide CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ to end-user patients. To facilitate our commercial activities in the U.S., we also employ various third parties, such as advertising agencies, market research firms and vendors providing other sales-support related services as needed, including digital marketing and other non-personal promotion. We believe that our commercial team and distribution practices are sufficient to facilitate our marketing efforts in reaching our target audience and our delivery of our products to patients in a timely and compliant fashion.

In addition, we rely on Ipsen and Takeda for ongoing and further commercialization and distribution of CABOMETYX in territories outside of the U.S., as well as for access and distribution activities for the approved products, including named patient use programs or similar programs, and we also rely on Ipsen for these same activities with respect to the commercialization and distribution of COMETRIQ outside of the U.S.

To help ensure that all eligible patients in the U.S. have appropriate access to CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ, we have established a comprehensive reimbursement and patient support program called Exelixis Access Services (EASE). Through EASE, we provide co-pay assistance to qualified, commercially insured patients to help minimize out-of-pocket costs and provide free drug to uninsured or underinsured patients who meet certain clinical and financial criteria. In addition, EASE provides comprehensive reimbursement support services, such as prior authorization assistance, benefits investigation and, if needed, appeals support. Beyond financial assistance, patients who participate in EASE also receive treatment coordination through a dedicated case manager, as well as clinical outreach and support from a network of oncology nurses or other healthcare professionals who help many of these patients better understand how to take their medication and mitigate side effects.

Environmental, Health and Safety

Our research and development processes involve the controlled use of certain hazardous materials and chemicals. In the U.S., at the federal, state and local levels, and in other foreign countries, we are subject to environmental, health and workplace safety laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous materials. While we have incurred, and will continue to incur, expenditures to maintain compliance with these laws and regulations, we do not expect the cost of complying with these laws and regulations to be material.

Due to the focus of our business in discovering and developing drug products, many of our employees work in our on-site laboratory facilities. All laboratory staff are trained on chemical hygiene, the use of personal protective equipment and other relevant laboratory safety topics, including working with blood-borne pathogens, and current staff are retrained regularly. We also extend these trainings to facilities staff and others who support our work in the labs. To maintain a safe environment for all staff, we have established a Lab Safety Committee to oversee the working conditions in our laboratory and office environments and conduct regular safety inspections, with reports provided to our Ethics Committee on a regular basis. We regularly perform thorough safety inspections of our laboratories, and continuously update our procedures based on the observations made during these inspections. Additionally, we conduct periodic industrial hygiene monitoring to ensure lab staff working with certain known hazardous chemicals do not exceed regulated exposure limits, regularly test and certify fume hoods, biosafety cabinets and other individual pieces of equipment on which employees rely to maintain a safe working environment. We also adhere to the standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Cal-OSHA and Bay Area Air Quality Management District, among other governing bodies, to ensure compliance with laws and regulations and help keep our employees safe.

Government Regulation

Clinical Development

The FDA and comparable regulatory agencies in state and local jurisdictions and in foreign countries impose substantial requirements upon the clinical development, manufacture and marketing of pharmaceutical products. These agencies and other federal, state and local entities regulate, among other things, research and development activities and the testing, marketing approval, manufacture, quality control, safety, effectiveness, labeling, storage, distribution, post-marketing safety reporting, export, import, record keeping, advertising and promotion of our products.

The process required by the FDA before product candidates may be marketed in the U.S. generally involves the following:

•nonclinical laboratory and animal tests, some of which must be conducted in accordance with Good Laboratory Practices (GLP);

•submission of an IND, which contains results of nonclinical studies (e.g., laboratory evaluations of the chemistry, formulation, stability and toxicity of the product candidate), together with manufacturing information, analytical data, any available clinical data or literature and a proposed clinical protocol, and must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;

•approval by an independent institutional review board or ethics committee at each clinical trial site before each trial may be initiated;

•adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials conducted in accordance with the protocol, IND and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) to establish the safety and efficacy of the product candidate for its proposed intended use;

•for drug products, submission of a New Drug Application (NDA) to the FDA for commercial marketing, or generally of a supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA), for approval of a new indication if the product is already approved for another indication;

•for biotherapeutic products, submission of a Biologics License Application (BLA) to the FDA for commercial marketing, or generally a supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) for approval of a new indication if the product is already approved for another indication;

•pre-approval inspection of manufacturing facilities and selected clinical investigators, clinical trial sites and/or Exelixis as the clinical trial sponsor for their compliance with GMP and GCP, respectively;

•payment of user fees for FDA review of an NDA or BLA unless a fee waiver applies;

•agreement with the FDA on the final labeling for the product and design and implementation of any required Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy;

•if the FDA convenes an advisory committee, satisfactory completion of the advisory committee review; and

•FDA approval of the NDA or sNDA, or BLA or sBLA.

For purposes of NDA approval, human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap or be combined:

•Phase 1 studies, which involve the initial introduction of a new drug product candidate into humans, are initially conducted in a limited number of subjects to test the product candidate for safety, tolerability, absorption, metabolism, distribution and excretion in healthy humans or patients. In rare cases, a Phase 1 study that is designed to assess effectiveness may serve as the basis for FDA marketing approval of a drug or for a label expansion. For instance, at FDA’s discretion, a product may receive approval based on a Phase 1b study if effectiveness results from the study are extremely compelling, approval of the drug would address a significant unmet patient need, and the drug is being approved through the accelerated approval pathway. As discussed below, Accelerated Approval generally requires at least one post-approval study to confirm clinical benefit.

•Phase 2 studies are conducted with groups of patients afflicted with a specified disease in order to provide enough data to evaluate the preliminary efficacy, optimal dosage, and common short-term side effect and risks associated with the drug. Multiple phase 2 clinical trials may be conducted by the sponsor to obtain information prior to beginning larger and more expensive phase 3 clinical trials. Phase 2 studies are typically well controlled, closely monitored, and conducted in a relatively small number of patients, usually involving no more than several hundred subjects.

•Phase 3 studies are conducted to gather the additional information about effectiveness and safety across a higher number of patients and evaluate the overall benefit-risk relationship of the product candidate following earlier phase evaluations, which will have provided preliminary evidence suggesting an effective dosage range and acceptable safety profile for the product candidate. Phase 3 trials are also intended to provide an adequate basis for physician labeling of the product if it is approved.

The FDA may require, or companies may pursue, additional clinical trials after a product is approved. These so-called post-marketing or “phase 4” studies may be deemed a condition to be satisfied after a drug receives approval. Failure to satisfy such post-marketing commitments can result in FDA enforcement action, up to and including withdrawal of NDA approval.

FDA Review and Approval

For approval of a new drug or changes to the labeling of an approved drug, including new indications, the results of product development, preclinical studies and clinical trials are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA, or as part of an sNDA. The submission of an NDA requires payment of a substantial user fee to the FDA. The FDA may convene an advisory committee to provide clinical insight on NDA review questions, although the FDA is not required to follow the recommendations of an advisory committee. The FDA may initially issue a Refuse to File letter for an incomplete NDA or sNDA, or it may deny approval of an NDA or sNDA by way of a Complete Response letter if the applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied, or alternatively require additional clinical and/or nonclinical data and/or an additional phase 3 pivotal clinical trial. Once issued, the FDA may withdraw product approval if ongoing regulatory standards are not met or if safety problems occur after the product reaches the market. Satisfaction of FDA development and approval requirements or similar requirements of state, local and foreign regulatory agencies typically takes several years, and the actual time required may vary substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product or disease. In particular, the FDA has developed and implemented, and continues to develop and implement, various guidance, programs and initiatives specific to oncology products that can affect product development and the data necessary for approval.

Any products manufactured or distributed by us pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including obtaining prior FDA approval of certain changes to the approved NDA, record-keeping requirements, and reporting of adverse experiences with, and interruptions in the manufacture of, the drug. Drug manufacturers and their subcontractors are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies. Thus, we and our third-party contract manufacturing organizations are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies for compliance with GMP, which impose certain manufacturing requirements (including procedural and documentation requirements) upon us and our third-party contract manufacturing organizations.

In the U.S., the Orphan Drug Act of 1983, as amended, provides incentives for the development of drugs and biotherapeutic products for rare diseases or conditions that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the U.S. (or for which there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making available the drug in the U.S. for such disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the drug in the U.S.). Certain of the incentives turn on the drug first being designated as an orphan drug. To be eligible for designation as an orphan drug (Orphan Drug Designation), the drug must have the potential to treat such rare disease or condition as described above. In addition, the FDA must not have previously approved a drug considered the “same drug,” as defined in the FDA’s orphan drug regulations, for the same orphan-designated indication or the sponsor of the subsequent drug must provide a plausible hypothesis of clinical superiority over the previously approved same drug. Upon receipt of Orphan Drug Designation, the sponsor is eligible for tax credits of up to 25% for qualified clinical trial expenses and waiver of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act application fee. In addition, upon marketing approval, an orphan-designated drug could be eligible for seven years of market exclusivity if no drug considered the same drug was previously approved for the same orphan condition (or if the subsequent drug is demonstrated to be clinically superior to any such previously approved same drug). Such orphan drug exclusivity, if awarded, would only block the approval of any drug considered the same drug for the same orphan indication. Moreover, a subsequent same drug could break an approved drug’s orphan exclusivity through a demonstration of clinical superiority over the previously approved drug.

Expedited FDA Approval Pathways

The FDA has various programs that are intended to expedite or simplify the process for developing and reviewing promising drugs, or to provide for the approval of a drug on the basis of a surrogate endpoint. Generally, drugs that are eligible for these programs are those for serious or life-threatening conditions, those with the potential to address unmet medical needs and those that offer meaningful benefits over existing treatments. Examples of such programs included Fast Track designation, breakthrough therapy designation, priority review and accelerated approval, and the eligibility criteria of and benefits for each program vary:

•Fast Track is a process designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of drugs intended to treat serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions that demonstrate the potential to fill unmet medical needs, by providing, among other things, eligibility for accelerated approval if relevant criteria are met, and rolling review, which allows submission of individually completed sections of an NDA or for FDA review before the entire submission is completed.

•Breakthrough therapy designation is a process designed to expedite the development and review of drugs that are intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints. Drugs designated as breakthrough therapies are also eligible for accelerated approval. The FDA will seek to ensure the sponsor of a breakthrough therapy product candidate receives intensive guidance on an efficient drug development program, intensive involvement of senior managers and experienced staff on a proactive, collaborative and cross-disciplinary review, and rolling review.

•Priority review is designed to shorten the review period for drugs that treat serious conditions and that, if approved, would offer significant advances in safety or effectiveness or would provide a treatment where no adequate therapy exists. Under priority review, the FDA aims to take action on the application within six months as compared to a standard review time of 10 months. Sponsors may also obtain a priority review voucher upon approval of an NDA for certain qualifying diseases and conditions that can be applied to a subsequent NDA submission.

•Accelerated approval provides for an earlier approval for a new drug that is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and that provides a meaningful advantage over available therapies and demonstrates an effect on a surrogate endpoint, or an intermediate clinical endpoint, which is considered reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. As a condition of approval, the FDA requires that a sponsor of a product candidate receiving accelerated approval perform post-marketing clinical trials or provide data on established clinical endpoints from the same trial to confirm the clinical benefit as predicted by the surrogate marker trial. The FDA may require such required post-marketing clinical trials to be underway prior to approval, or within a specific period thereafter, and will specify the conditions for such trials. Further, sponsors must provide reports on post-marketing trial progress no later than 180 days after approval and every 180 days thereafter until such trials are completed. The failure to conduct required post-marketing trials with due diligence and or to submit the required reports are prohibited acts, and these failures by sponsor in administering such trials, or the failure of such trials to confirm the clinically meaningful outcome, may result in withdrawal of the approval of the drug or the indication approved under accelerated approval. The FDA can also withdraw an accelerated approval on an expedited basis provided it follows certain procedures.

Specifically, with respect to oncology products, the FDA may review applications under the Real-Time Oncology Review (RTOR) program established by the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence. The RTOR program, which allows an applicant to pre-submit components of the application to allow the FDA to review clinical data before the complete filing is submitted, aims to explore a more efficient review process to ensure that safe and effective treatments are available to patients as early as possible, while maintaining and improving review quality. Drugs considered for review under the RTOR program must be likely to demonstrate substantial improvements over available therapy, which may include drugs previously granted breakthrough therapy designation for the same or other indications and must have straight-forward study designs and endpoints that can be easily interpreted.

Abbreviated FDA Approval Pathways and Generic Products

The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (The Hatch-Waxman Act) established two abbreviated approval pathways for drug products in which potential competitors may rely upon the FDA’s prior approval of the same or similar drug product.

•Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). An ANDA may be approved by the FDA if the applicant demonstrates that the proposed generic product is the same as the approved drug, which is referred to as the Reference Listed Drug (RLD). Generally, an ANDA must contain data and information showing that the proposed generic product and RLD (1) have the same active ingredient, in the same strength and dosage form, to be delivered via the same route of administration, (2) are intended for the same uses, and (3) are bioequivalent. This is instead of independently demonstrating the proposed product’s safety and effectiveness through clinical development. Conducting bioequivalence testing is generally less time consuming and costly than conducting a full set of clinical trials in humans. In this regard, the FDA has published draft guidance containing product-specific bioequivalence recommendations for drug products containing cabozantinib, the active pharmaceutical ingredient in CABOMETYX and COMETRIQ, as it does for many FDA-approved drug products.

•505(b)(2) NDAs. A 505(b)(2) NDA is an application for which one or more of the investigations relied upon by the applicant for approval were not conducted by or for the applicant and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference or use from the person by or for whom the investigations were conducted. Under Section 505(b)(2) NDA of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), an applicant may rely, in part, on the FDA’s previous approval of a similar product, or published literature, in support of its application. If the 505(b)(2) NDA applicant establishes that reliance on the FDA’s prior findings of safety and efficacy for an approved product is scientifically appropriate, it may eliminate the need to conduct certain preclinical or clinical studies. The FDA may require additional studies or measurements, including comparability studies.

Unlike a full NDA for which the sponsor has conducted or obtained a right of reference to all the data essential to approval, the filing of an ANDA or a 505(b)(2) NDA may be delayed due to patent or exclusivity protections covering an approved product. The Hatch-Waxman Act provides (a) up to five years of exclusivity for the first approval of a new chemical entity (NCE) exclusivity and (b) three years of exclusivity for approval of an NDA or sNDA for a product that is not an NCE but rather where the application contains new clinical studies conducted or sponsored by the sponsor and considered essential to the approval of the NDA or sNDA (three-year “changes” exclusivity). NCE exclusivity runs from the time of approval of the NDA and bars FDA from accepting for review of any ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA for a drug containing the same active moiety for five years (or for four years if the application contains a Paragraph IV certification that a reference product patent is invalid or not infringed by the ANDA/505(b)(2) NDA product). The three-year “changes” exclusivity generally bars the FDA from approving any ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA application that relies on the information supporting the approval of the drug or the change to the drug for which the information was submitted and the exclusivity granted.

Both Congress and the FDA are considering, and have enacted, various legislative and regulatory proposals focused on drug competition, including legislation focused on drug patenting and provision of drug to generic applicants for testing. For example, the Ensuring Innovation Act, enacted in April 2021, amended the FDA’s statutory authority for granting NCE exclusivity to reflect the agency’s existing regulations and longstanding interpretation that award NCE exclusivity based on a drug’s active moiety, as opposed to its active ingredient, which is intended to limit the applicability of NCE exclusivity, thereby potentially facilitating generic competition. In addition, the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, which incorporated the framework from the Creating and Restoring Equal Access To Equivalent Samples (CREATES) legislation, allows ANDA, 505(b)(2) NDA or biosimilar developers to obtain access to branded drug and biotherapeutic product samples. Further, Section 3222 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, enacted on December 29, 2022 (the 2023 Appropriations Act), requires the FDA to make therapeutic equivalence determinations for 505(b)(2) NDAs at the time of approval, or up to 180 days thereafter, if requested by the applicant.

Additionally, Section 3224 of the 2023 Appropriations Act allows the FDA to approve an ANDA even if there are differences between the generic drug’s proposed labeling and that of the listed drug due to the FDA approving a change to the listed drug’s label (excluding warnings) within 90 days of when the ANDA is otherwise eligible for approval, provided that the ANDA applicant agrees to submit revised labeling for the generic drug within 60 days of approval. Moreover, in September 2023, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a policy statement, supported by the FDA, warning brand pharmaceutical companies that they could face legal action under the FTC Act if they improperly list patents in the Orange Book, and in November 2023, the FTC subsequently initiated challenges against patents held by brand pharmaceutical companies and listed in the Orange Book under the FDA’s patent listing dispute process.

Orange Book Listing. An NDA sponsor must identify to the FDA patents that claim the drug substance or drug product or approved method of using the drug. When the drug is approved, those patents are among the information about the product that is listed in the FDA publication, Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, which is referred to as the Orange Book. Any applicant who files an ANDA or a 505(b)(2) NDA must certify, for each patent listed in the Orange Book for the RLD that (1) no patent information on the drug product that is the subject of the application has been submitted to the FDA, (2) such patent has expired, (3) the listed patent will expire on a particular date and approval is sought after patent expiration, or (4) such patent is invalid or will not be infringed upon by the manufacture, use or sale of the drug product for which the application is submitted. An ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA applicant may also submit a statement that it intends to carve-out from the labeling of its product an RLD’s use that is protected by exclusivity or a method of use patent. The fourth certification described above is known as a Paragraph IV certification. A notice of the Paragraph IV certification must be provided to each owner of the patent that is the subject of the certification and to the reference NDA holder. The reference NDA holder and patent owners may initiate a patent infringement lawsuit in response to the Paragraph IV notice. Filing such a lawsuit within 45 days of the receipt of the Paragraph IV certification notice prevents the FDA from approving the ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA until the earlier of 30 months, expiration of the patent, settlement of the lawsuit, or a decision in the infringement case that is favorable to the ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA applicant. The ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA also will not receive final approval until any applicable non-patent exclusivity listed in the Orange Book for the RLD has expired.

Regulatory Approval Outside of the United States

In addition to regulations in the U.S., we are subject to regulations of other countries governing clinical trials and the manufacturing, commercial sales and distribution of our products outside of the U.S. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain approval by the comparable regulatory authorities of countries outside of the U.S. before we can commence clinical trials in such countries and approval of the regulators of such countries or economic areas, such as the EU, before we may market products in those countries or areas. The approval process and requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary greatly from place to place, and the time may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval.

The way clinical trials are conducted in the EU has undergone a major change with the application of Regulation (EU) 536/2014, repealing the existing Directive 2001/20/EC. This new regulation harmonizes the assessment and supervision processes for clinical trials throughout the EU, via an EU portal and database, which the EMA will maintain in collaboration with the Member States and the EC. Following the EC’s confirmation of full functionality of the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) through an independent audit, which was published in the Official Journal of the European Union in August 2021, Regulation (EU) 536/2014 became applicable concurrent with the CTIS “go-live” date on January 31, 2022. While existing clinical trials could continue to be conducted under the rules of Directive 2001/20/EC until January 31, 2025, any clinical trial initiated on or after January 31, 2023 must comply with the rules of the new regulation.

Under EU regulatory systems, a company may submit a marketing authorization application (MAA) either under centralized or decentralized procedure. Under the centralized procedure, MAAs are submitted to the EMA for scientific review by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) so that an opinion is issued on product approvability. The opinion is considered by the EC which is responsible for granting the centralized marketing authorization in the form of a binding EC decision. If the application is approved, the EC grants a single marketing authorization that is valid for all EU Member States as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway, collectively the European Economic Area. The decentralized and mutual recognition procedures, as well as national authorization procedure are available for products for which the centralized procedure is not compulsory. The mutual recognition procedure provides for the EU Member States selected by the applicant to mutually recognize a national marketing authorization that has already been granted by the competent authority of another Member State, referred to as the Reference Member State (RMS). The decentralized procedure is used when the product in question has yet to be granted a marketing authorization in any Member State. Under this procedure the applicant can select the Member State that will act as the RMS. In both the mutual recognition and decentralized procedures, the RMS reviews the application and submits its assessment of the application to the Member States where marketing authorizations are being sought, referred to as Concerned Member States. Within 90 days of receiving the application and assessment report, each Concerned Member State must decide whether to recognize the RMS assessment or reject it based on potential serious risk to public health. If the disputed points cannot be resolved, the matter is eventually referred to the Coordination Group on Mutual Recognition and Decentralized Procedures in the first instance to reach an agreement and failing to reach such an agreement, a referral to the EMA and the CHMP for arbitration that will result in an opinion to form the basis of a decision to be issued by the EC binding on all Member States. If the application is successful during the decentralized or mutual recognition procedure, national marketing authorizations will be granted by the competent authorities in each of the Member States chosen by the applicant.

Conditional marketing authorizations may be granted in the centralized procedure for a limited number of medicinal products for human use referenced in EU law applicable to conditional marketing authorizations where the clinical dataset is not comprehensive, if (1) the risk-benefit balance of the product is positive, (2) it is likely that the applicant will be in a position to provide the required comprehensive clinical trial data, (3) unmet medical needs will be fulfilled and (4) the benefit to public health of the immediate availability on the market of the medicinal product outweighs the risk inherent in the fact that additional data are still required.

As in the U.S., we may apply for designation of a product as an orphan drug for the treatment of a specific indication in the EU before the application for marketing authorization is made. In the EU, orphan designation is available for products in development which are either: (a) intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting not more than 5 in 10,000 persons in the EU; or (b) intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition affecting a larger number of persons but when, without incentives, it is unlikely that sales of the drug in the EU would be sufficient to justify the necessary investment in developing the medicinal product. Additionally, the sponsor of an application for designation of a product as an orphan drug in the EU must establish that there exists no satisfactory authorized method of diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of the condition or even if such treatment exists, the product will be of significant benefit to those affected by that condition.

Orphan drugs in the EU enjoy economic and marketing benefits, including up to ten years of market exclusivity for the approved indication unless another applicant for a similar medicinal product can show that its product is safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior to the orphan-designated product. The period of market exclusivity may be reduced to six years if at the end of the fifth year it is established that the criteria for orphan designation are no longer met, including where it is shown that the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of market exclusivity.

Healthcare and Privacy Regulation

Federal and state healthcare laws, including fraud and abuse and health information privacy and security laws, also govern our business. If we fail to comply with those laws, we could face substantial penalties and our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could be adversely affected. The laws that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not limited to: the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), which prohibits, among other things, soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, to induce or reward for, the purchase or recommendation of an item or service reimbursable under a federal healthcare program, such as Medicare and Medicaid; the FDCA and its implementing regulations, which prohibit, among other things, the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of any drug that is adulterated or misbranded; and federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the civil False Claims Act, and civil monetary penalty laws, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other third-party payers that are false or fraudulent. Additionally, we are subject to state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, which may be broader in scope and apply regardless of whether the payer is a governmental healthcare program, and many of which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, further complicate compliance efforts.

Numerous federal and state laws, including state security breach notification laws, state health information privacy laws and federal and state consumer protection laws, govern the collection, use and disclosure of personal information. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended (CCPA), went into operation in January 2020 and broadly defines personal information, affords California residents expanded privacy rights and protections and provides for civil penalties for violations and a private right of action related to certain data security breaches. These protections were expanded by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), which became effective in most key respects in January 2023 and became enforceable in certain respects in July 2023, with the CPRA’s implementing regulations currently subject to a stay of enforcement until one year from their issuance. Privacy laws in other states may also impact our operations, including both comprehensive and sector specific legislation, and Congress is considering additional federal privacy legislation. In addition, most healthcare professionals and facilities who may prescribe our products and from whom we may obtain patient health information, are subject to privacy and security requirements under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology and Clinical Health Act (HIPAA). Although we are not considered to be a covered entity or business associate under HIPAA with respect to our clinical and commercial activities, we could be subject to penalties if we use or disclose individually identifiable health information in a manner not authorized or permitted by HIPAA. The legislative and regulatory landscape for privacy and data protection continues to evolve, and there has been an increasing amount of focus on privacy and data protection issues with the potential to affect our business, including laws in all 50 states requiring security breach notification in some circumstances. The CCPA, as amended by the CPRA, HIPAA and these other laws could create liability for us or increase our cost of doing business. International laws, such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR), could also apply to our operations. Failure to provide adequate privacy protections and maintain compliance with applicable privacy laws could jeopardize business transactions across borders and result in significant penalties.

In addition, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended (PPACA) created a federal requirement under the federal Open Payments program, that requires certain manufacturers to track and report to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) annually certain payments and other transfers of value provided to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), other healthcare professionals (such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners) and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership interests held by such physicians and their immediate family during the previous calendar year.

Because our products are covered in the U.S. by the Medicaid program, we have various obligations, including government price reporting and rebate requirements, which generally require us to pay substantial rebates or offer our drugs at substantial discounts to certain purchasers (including “covered entities” purchasing under the 340B Drug Pricing Program (the 340B Program)). CMS continues to issue guidance and rulemaking governing our participation in the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP), and we cannot predict how future guidance or rules would affect our profitability (including the potential for increases in our overall Medicaid rebate liability and the obligation to charge greatly reduced prices to covered entities). We are also required to discount our products to authorized users of the Federal Supply Schedule of the General Services Administration, under which additional laws and requirements apply. These programs require submission of pricing data and calculation of discounts and rebates pursuant to complex statutory formulas and regulatory guidance, as well as the entry into government procurement contracts governed by the Federal Acquisition Regulations, and the guidance governing such calculations is not always clear. Compliance with such requirements can require significant investment in personnel, systems and resources. Failure to properly calculate prices, or to offer required discounts or rebates could subject us to substantial penalties.

Coverage and Reimbursement

Sales of our approved products and any future products of ours will depend, in part, on the extent to which their costs will be covered by third-party payers, such as government health programs, commercial insurance and managed healthcare organizations. Each third-party payer may have its own policy regarding what products it will cover, the conditions under which it will cover such products, and how much it will pay for such products. Third-party payers may limit coverage to specific drug products on an approved list, also known as a formulary, which might not include all of the FDA-approved drugs for a particular indication. Moreover, a third-party payer’s decision to provide coverage for a drug product does not guarantee what reimbursement rate, if any, will be approved. Patients may be less likely to use our products if coverage is not provided and reimbursement may not cover a significant portion of the cost of our products.

In the U.S. and other potentially significant markets for our products, government authorities and third-party payers are increasingly attempting to limit or regulate the price of medical products and services, particularly for new and innovative products and therapies, which may result in lower average selling prices. In some cases, for example, third-party payers try to encourage the use of less expensive generic products through their prescription benefits coverage and reimbursement and co-pay policies. Further, the increased emphasis on managed healthcare in the U.S. and on country-specific and national pricing and reimbursement controls in the EU will put additional pressure on product pricing, reimbursement and usage, which may adversely affect our future product sales and results of operations. These pressures can arise from rules and practices of managed care groups, judicial decisions and governmental laws and regulations related to Medicare, Medicaid and healthcare reform, pharmaceutical reimbursement policies and pricing in general. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing coverage and/or reimbursement controls and measures, could have a material adverse impact on our net product revenues and results of operations.

Healthcare Reform

The U.S. and some foreign countries are considering proposals or have enacted legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare system that could affect our ability to sell our products profitably. Among policy makers and payers in the U.S. and elsewhere, there is significant interest in promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, improving quality and/or expanding access.

There has been increasing legislative and enforcement interest in the U.S. with respect to drug pricing practices. In particular, there have been several recent U.S. Congressional inquiries, hearings and proposed and enacted federal legislation and rules, as well as executive orders and sub-regulatory guidance that may impact pricing for pharmaceutical products. These initiatives include, among others:

•efforts to reevaluate, reduce or limit the prices patients pay for pharmaceutical products;

•implementation of additional data collection and transparency reporting regarding drug pricing, rebates, fees and other remuneration provided by drug manufacturers;

•revisions to rules associated with the calculation of average manufacturer price and best price under Medicaid;

•eliminate the AKS discount safe harbor protection for manufacturer rebate arrangements with Medicare Part D plan sponsors;

•changes to the MDRP, including through a recent CMS-proposed rulemaking for this program, that could significantly increase manufacturer rebate liability; and

•reevaluation of safe harbors under the AKS.

For instance, in August 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (Inflation Reduction Act), which among other things: allows CMS to establish the prices of certain single-source drugs and biotherapeutics reimbursed under Medicare Part B and Part D (the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program); subjects drug manufacturers to potential civil monetary penalties and a significant “excise tax” for offering a price that is not equal to or less than the government-imposed “maximum fair price” under the law; imposes additional rebates for certain Part B and Part D drugs where relevant pricing metrics associated with the products increase faster than inflation; and redesigns the funding and benefit structure of the Medicare Part D program, potentially increasing manufacturer liability while capping annual out-of-pocket drug expenses for Medicare beneficiaries. These provisions started taking effect incrementally beginning in 2022 and certain provisions currently are subject to various legal challenges. As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for example, CMS has begun to implement aspects of the Inflation Reduction Act and has released revised guidance addressing the Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D inflation rebate provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act. These provisions generally require manufacturers of Medicare Part B and Part D rebatable drugs to pay inflation rebates to the Medicare program if pricing metrics associated with their products increase faster than the rate of inflation. In addition, in June 2023, CMS released revised guidance setting forth the requirements and procedures for implementing the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program for the first round of drug pricing evaluations, which will occur in 2023 and 2024 and result in prices effective in 2026. In July and August 2023, CMS also issued draft guidance on the Medicare Prescription Payment Plan, under which Medicare Part D beneficiaries may opt to make their cost-sharing payments in capped monthly installments; CMS expects that this program will most likely benefit those beneficiaries with high cost-sharing early in their respective plan years. Over time, the Inflation Reduction Act could reduce the revenues we are able to collect from sales of our products or present challenges for payor negotiations and formulary access for our products, as well as increase our government discount and rebate liabilities; however, the degree of impact that the Inflation Reduction Act will ultimately have upon our business remains unclear.

At the state level, legislatures and regulatory agencies have increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biotherapeutic product pricing, including restrictions on pricing or reimbursement at the state government level, limitations on discounts to patients, advance notices of price increases, marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, policies to encourage importation from other countries (subject to federal approval) and bulk purchasing. These laws may affect our sales, marketing, and other promotional activities by imposing administrative and compliance burdens on us. In addition, given the lack of clarity with respect to these laws and their implementation, our reporting actions could be subject to the penalty provisions of the pertinent state and federal authorities.

The U.S. pharmaceutical industry has already been significantly impacted by major legislative initiatives and related political contests. For instance, efforts to repeal, substantially modify or invalidate some or all of the provisions of the PPACA, some of which have been successful, create considerable uncertainties for all businesses involved in healthcare, including our own. In addition, there have been, and may in the future be, initiatives at both the federal and state-level that could significantly modify the terms and scope of government-provided health insurance coverage, ranging from establishing a single-payer, national health insurance system to more limited “buy-in” options to existing public health insurance programs, each of which could have a significant impact on the healthcare industry. Although such attempts to reform the U.S. healthcare system have not significantly impacted our business to date, it is possible that additional legislative, executive and judicial activities in the future could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As a result of these developments and trends, third-party payers are increasingly attempting to contain healthcare costs by limiting coverage and the level of reimbursement of new drugs. These entities could refuse, limit or condition coverage for our products, such as by using tiered reimbursement or pressing for new forms of contracting, or alternatively for patients who rely on our co-pay assistance program, implement co-pay accumulators or maximizers that exempt such co-pay assistance from deductibles (or otherwise modify benefit designs in a manner that takes into account the availability of co-pay assistance), which has increased and could further increase the costs of our co-pay assistance program or cause patients to abandon CABOMETYX or COMETRIQ therapy due to higher out-of-pocket costs. Due to general uncertainty in the current regulatory and healthcare policy environment, and specifically regarding positions that the Biden Administration may take with respect to these issues, we are unable to predict the impact of any legislative, regulatory, third-party payer or policy actions, including potential cost containment and healthcare reform measures. In addition, it is also possible that CMS could issue new rulemaking or guidance that would affect the amount of rebates owed under the MDRP.

In addition, in some foreign countries, the proposed pricing for a drug must be approved before its cost may be funded within the respective national healthcare system. The requirements governing drug pricing vary widely from country to country. For example, EU Member States may restrict the range of medicinal products for which their national healthcare systems provide reimbursement and may control the prices of medicinal products for human use. A Member State may approve a specific price for the medicinal product or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profits the medicinal product generates for the company placing it on the market. Pricing and reimbursement negotiations with governmental authorities or payers in EU Member States can take six to 12 months or longer after the initial marketing authorization is granted for a product, or after the marketing authorization for a new indication is granted. To obtain reimbursement and/or pricing approval in some countries, drug manufacturers and collaboration partners may also be required to conduct a study or otherwise provide data that seeks to establish the cost effectiveness of a new drug compared with other available established therapies. Other cost-control initiatives are similarly focused on affordability and accessibility, such as the Regulation on Health Technology Assessment (HTA Regulation) adopted in December 2021 and entering into effect in January 2025, as well as other upcoming legislative and policy changes aimed at increasing cooperation between EU Member States, and once enacted these initiatives may further impact the price and reimbursement status of many medicinal products. There can be no assurance that any country that has price controls, reimbursement limitations or other requirements for pharmaceutical products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements for any of our products on cost-effectiveness grounds. Historically, products launched in EU Member States and other non-U.S. jurisdictions do not follow the price structures of the U.S., and they generally tend to be priced significantly lower.

Competition

There are many companies focused on the development of small molecules, antibodies and other treatments for cancer. Our competitors and potential competitors include major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as academic research institutions, clinical reference laboratories and government agencies that are pursuing research activities similar to ours. Many of the organizations competing with us have greater capital resources, larger research and development staff and facilities, deeper regulatory expertise and more extensive product manufacturing and commercial capabilities than we do, which may afford them a competitive advantage.

Competition for Cabozantinib

We believe that our ability to compete successfully with cabozantinib in the therapeutic markets where it is or may be approved will depend on, among other things:

•efficacy, safety and reliability of cabozantinib, both alone and in combination with other therapies;

•timing and scope of regulatory approval;

•the speed at which we develop cabozantinib for the treatment of additional tumor types beyond its approved indications;

•our ability to complete clinical development and obtain regulatory approvals for cabozantinib, both alone and in combination with other therapies;

•our ability to manufacture and sell commercial quantities of cabozantinib product to the market;

•our ability to successfully commercialize cabozantinib, both as a single agent and as part of any combination therapy regimen, and secure coverage and adequate reimbursement in approved indications;

•product acceptance by physicians and other health care providers;

•the level of our collaboration partners’ investments in the resources necessary to successfully commercialize cabozantinib, or any combination therapy regimen that includes cabozantinib, in territories where they are approved;

•skills of our employees and our ability to recruit and retain skilled employees;

•protection of our intellectual property, including our ability to enforce our intellectual property rights against potential generic competition; and

•the availability of substantial capital resources to fund development and commercialization activities.

We believe that the quality and breadth of activity observed with cabozantinib, the skill of our employees and our ability to recruit and retain skilled employees, our patent portfolio and our capabilities for research and drug development are competitive strengths. However, many large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have significantly larger intellectual property estates than we do, substantially more capital resources than we have, and greater capabilities and experience than we do in preclinical and clinical development, sales, marketing, manufacturing and regulatory affairs.

Furthermore, the specific indications for which CABOMETYX is currently or may be approved, based on the results from clinical trials currently evaluating cabozantinib, are highly competitive. Several novel therapies and combinations of therapies have been approved, are in advanced stages of clinical development or are under expedited regulatory review in these indications, and these other therapies are currently competing or are expected to compete with CABOMETYX. While we have had success in adapting our development strategy for the cabozantinib franchise to address the competitive landscape, including through evaluation of therapies that combine ICIs with other targeted agents, it is uncertain whether current and future clinical trials will lead to additional regulatory approvals, or whether physicians will prescribe regimens containing cabozantinib instead of competing product combinations in approved indications.

Below is a summary of the principal competition for cabozantinib in the indications for which it is approved or for which it has been or is currently being evaluated in potentially label-enabling trials, both as a single agent and in combination with other therapies. The information below does not include all competitor products, but rather those approved products that have or we believe may capture significant market share within their respective indications, or with respect to therapies still in development, those that are likely to overlap with patient populations that are or may be treated with cabozantinib or a combination therapy regimen that includes cabozantinib.

Competition in Approved Cabozantinib Indications

CABOMETYX - RCC: We believe the principal competition for CABOMETYX in advanced RCC includes: the combination of Merck & Co.’s pembrolizumab and Pfizer’s axitinib; the combination of BMS’s ipilimumab and nivolumab; the combination of Merck & Co.’s pembrolizumab and Eisai’s lenvatinib; and Novartis’ everolimus. Additionally, there are a variety of therapies being developed for advanced RCC, including: Merck & Co.’s belzutifan; the combination of Merck & Co.’s belzutifan and Eisai’s lenvatinib; the combination of Merck & Co.’s pembrolizumab and belzutifan and Eisai’s lenvatinib; the combination of Merck & Co.’s pembrolizumab and quavonlimab and Eisai’s lenvatinib; and BMS’ nivolumab (administered subcutaneously).

The competitive landscape for RCC is evolving rapidly, especially given the entrance and increased adoption of ICI and ICI-TKI combination therapies into the RCC treatment landscape, particularly in the first-line setting. This has led to changing trends in prescribing and sequencing of certain drugs and combinations across different lines of therapy. It is difficult to predict how these changes will affect sales of CABOMETYX during 2024 and going forward.

CABOMETYX - HCC: We believe the principal competition for CABOMETYX in previously treated HCC includes: Bayer’s regorafenib; and Eisai’s lenvatinib.

The competitive landscape for HCC has changed with the increased adoption of ICI combination therapies in the first-line setting. This has led to increased competition due to the increase in prescribing and sequencing of TKIs in subsequent lines of therapy as more patients overall receive multiple lines of therapy. It is difficult to predict how these changes will affect sales of CABOMETYX during 2024 and going forward.

CABOMETYX - DTC: We believe the principal competition for CABOMETYX in its previously treated DTC indication includes two treatments that are also approved for previously untreated DTC: Bayer’s sorafenib and generic versions of sorafenib; and Eisai’s lenvatinib. In addition, we believe there is also competition for CABOMETYX from mutation-targeted therapies approved or in development to treat patients with advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer who require systemic therapy and who are RAI-refractory (if RAI is appropriate), or patients with BRAF V600E mutations, including: Blueprint Medicine’s and Roche’s pralsetinib; Eli Lilly‘s selpercatinib; and the combination of Novartis’ dabrafenib and trametinib.

Other than the approvals of RET inhibitors to treat certain DTC patients, there has been little change in the competitive landscape for RAI-refractory DTC treatments during recent years.

COMETRIQ - MTC: We believe that the principal competing anti-cancer therapy to COMETRIQ in progressive, metastatic MTC is Genzyme’s vandetanib, which has been approved by the FDA and the EC for the treatment of symptomatic or progressive MTC in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic disease, as well as other therapies that have been recently approved to treat patients with advanced or metastatic RET-mutant MTC who require systemic therapy, including: Blueprint Medicines’ and Roche’s pralsetinib; and Eli Lilly’s selpercatinib.

Other than the recent approvals of RET inhibitors to treat certain MTC patients, there has been little change in the treatment landscape for progressive, metastatic MTC during recent years, and due to the limited number of ongoing late-stage clinical trials in this indication, we do not expect many additional competitors to emerge in 2024.

Competition in Potential Cabozantinib Indications

Cabozantinib in combination with ICI - mCRPC: CONTACT-02 is a phase 3 pivotal trial evaluating the combination of cabozantinib and atezolizumab in patients with mCRPC and measurable extra-pelvic soft-tissue disease who have progressed after treatment with one prior NHT. Should the combination of cabozantinib and atezolizumab be approved for the treatment of these mCRPC patients, we believe its principal competition may include the following approved therapies or therapies in late-stage development: Janssen Biotech’s (a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) abiraterone; Astellas Pharma’s and Pfizer’s enzalutamide; Sanofi’s docetaxel; Veru Pharma’s sabizabulin; the combination of Clovis Oncology’s rucaparib and Pfizer’s enzalutamide; the combination of Clovis Oncology’s rucaparib and BMS’s nivolumab; the combination of Janssen Biotech’s abiraterone and prednisone, with or without Eli Lily’s ademaciclib; and Hinova Pharmaceuticals’ HC-1119; and generic versions of abiraterone and docetaxel. In addition, we believe there may be competition for the combination of cabozantinib and atezolizumab in mCRPC from approved therapies or therapies in late-stage development focused on the subset of mCRPC patients who are prostate-specific membrane antigen positive, including: Novartis’ lutetium Lu177 vipivotide tetraxetan (formerly 177Lu-PSMA-617); POINT Biopharma’s (a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly) PNT2002 (formerly 177Lu-PNT2002); Telix International’s 177Lu-DOTA-rosopatamab; and Curium US LLC’s 177Lu-PSMA-I&T.

Cabozantinib - pNET/epNET: CABINET is a phase 3 pivotal trial, which evaluated cabozantinib versus placebo in patients who experienced progression after prior systemic therapy in two independently powered cohorts: pNET and epNET. Should cabozantinib be approved for treatment in patients with pNET and/or epNET, we believe its principal competition may include the following approved therapies or therapies in late-stage development: Novartis’ lutetium Lu177 dotatate; Novartis’s everolimus; Pfizer’s sunitinib; the combination of Roche’s capecitabine and Merck & Co.’s temozolomide; and RayzeBio’s Actinium-225 dotatate.

Competition for Zanzalintinib

While we have not yet submitted an NDA to the FDA for zanzalintinib, we believe that the factors that will impact our ability to compete in indications where zanzalintinib may be approved would be similar to those for the cabozantinib franchise, as described above. Below is a summary of the principal competition for zanzalintinib in the indications for which it is currently being evaluated in potentially label-enabling trials, both as a single agent and in combination with other therapies. The information below does not include all competitor products, but rather those approved products that have or we believe may capture significant market share within their respective indications, or with respect to therapies still in development, those that are likely to overlap with patient populations that are or may be treated with zanzalintinib or a combination therapy regimen that includes zanzalintinib.

Competition in Potential Zanzalintinib Indications

Zanzalintinib in combination with ICI - CRC: STELLAR-303 is a phase 3 pivotal trial evaluating the combination of zanzalintinib and atezolizumab in patients with metastatic non-microsatellite instability-high or non-mismatch repair-deficient CRC who have progressed after, or are intolerant to, the current standard of care. Should the combination of zanzalintinib and atezolizumab be approved for the treatment of these CRC patients, we believe its principal competition may include the following approved therapies or therapies in late-stage development: Bayer’s regorafenib; Taiho Oncoloy’s trifluridine/tipiracil; the combination of Taiho Oncoloy’s trifluridine/tipiracil and Roche’s bevacizumab; Hutchison MediPharma’s fruquintinib; and the combination of Agenus’ botensilimab and balstilimab.

Zanzalintinib in combination with ICI - RCC: STELLAR-304 is a phase 3 pivotal trial evaluating zanzalintinib in combination with nivolumab in previously untreated patients with advanced non-clear cell RCC. Should the combination of zanzalintinib and nivolumab be approved for the treatment of these RCC patients, we believe its principal competition may include similar approved therapies or therapies in late-stage development that compete with cabozantinib or combination regimens containing cabozantinib in various RCC indications.

Zanzalintinib in combination with ICI - SCCHN: STELLAR-305 is a phase 2/3 pivotal trial evaluating zanzalintinib in combination with Merck & Co.’s ICI, pembrolizumab, versus pembrolizumab alone in patients with previously untreated PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. Should the combination of zanzalintinib and pembrolizumab be approved for the treatment of these SCCHN patients, we believe its principal competition may include the following approved therapies or therapies in late-stage development: the combination of Eli Lily’s cetuximab, platinum chemotherapy and 5-fluoruracil; Merck & Co.’s pembrolizumab; and the combination of Merck & Co.’s pembrolizumab, platinum chemotherapy and 5-fluorouracil.

Competition for Cobimetinib and Esaxerenone

There is competition for both cobimetinib and esaxerenone in the specific indications and territories where they are approved, and there are regular new entrants and developments in all aspects of these markets. However, given the relatively lesser degree of adoption of these therapies within the broader markets in which they compete and their minimal contribution to our total revenues as out-licensed products, we do not believe changes in the competitive landscape in these indications will have a material impact on our business.

Patents and Proprietary Rights

We actively seek patent protection in the U.S., EU and selected other foreign jurisdictions to cover our product candidates and related technologies. Patents extend for varying periods according to the date of patent filing or grant and the legal term of patents in the various countries where patent protection is obtained. The actual protection afforded by a patent, which can vary from country to country, depends on the type of patent, the scope of its coverage and the availability of legal remedies in the country. We have numerous patents and pending patent applications that relate to methods of screening drug targets, compounds that modulate drug targets, as well as methods of making and using such compounds.

While many patent applications have been filed relating to the product candidates that we have developed, the majority of these are not yet issued or allowed. To our knowledge, we own all global patents necessary for the continued sale and development of cabozantinib and cobimetinib, and we either own or have in-licensed all global patents for our other product candidates, as further described below.

Cabozantinib

Cabozantinib is covered by more than 15 issued patents in the U.S., building from U.S. Patent No. 7,579,473, for the composition of matter of cabozantinib and pharmaceutical compositions thereof. This composition of matter patent would expire in September 2024, but we have been granted a patent term extension to extend the term to August 2026. The following table describes the U.S. patents that cover our marketed cabozantinib products, and which are listed in the Orange Book. Except as otherwise noted, the stated expiration dates include any patent term extensions already granted. In addition to the composition of matter patent referenced above, the table includes patents directed to, among other things, particular salts, polymorphs, formulations, or use of the compound in the treatment of specified diseases or conditions. We continue to pursue additional patents and patent term extensions in the U.S. and other territories covering various aspects of our cabozantinib products that may, if issued, extend exclusivity beyond the expiration of the patents listed in the table.

Given the importance of our intellectual property portfolio to our business operations, we vigorously enforce our rights and defend against challenges that have arisen or may arise with respect to patents and patent applications required for the commercialization of medicines containing cabozantinib. For example, in September 2019, we received a Paragraph IV notice letter regarding an ANDA submitted to the FDA by MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MSN), requesting approval to market a generic version of CABOMETYX tablets, which MSN then amended with additional Paragraph IV certifications in May 2020, January 2022 and June 2022. In response, we have filed a total of four patent infringement lawsuits against MSN in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (the Delaware District Court): the first two lawsuits filed in October 2019 and May 2020 were later consolidated into a single case (referred to as MSN I) and adjudicated at a bench trial in May 2022; and the third and fourth lawsuits filed in February 2022 and July 2022, respectively, were also consolidated into a single case (referred to as MSN II) and adjudicated at another bench trial in October 2023. In January 2023, the Delaware District Court issued a ruling in the MSN I case, rejecting MSN’s invalidity challenge to U.S. Patent No. 7,759,473, which expires in 2026, but also ruled that MSN’s proposed ANDA product does not infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,877,776, which expires in 2030. This ruling in MSN I does not impact the parties’ claims in the separate and ongoing MSN II lawsuit. In October 2023, a bench trial occurred for the MSN II case, and a judgment is expected during the first half of 2024.

In addition, in May 2021, we received Paragraph IV certification notice letters regarding an ANDA submitted to the FDA by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Teva Pharmaceuticals Development, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (individually and collectively referred to as Teva), requesting approval to market a generic version of CABOMETYX tablets, which Teva then amended with additional Paragraph IV certifications in July 2022. In response, we have filed two patent infringement lawsuits against Teva in the Delaware District Court in June 2021 and September 2022, which were consolidated into a single case, and all proceedings in our litigation against Teva were stayed pursuant to an order of the Delaware District Court in October 2022. On July 18, 2023, we entered into a settlement and license agreement (the Teva Settlement Agreement) with Teva to end these litigations. Pursuant to the terms of the Teva Settlement Agreement, we will grant Teva a license to market its generic version of CABOMETYX in the U.S. beginning on January 1, 2031, if approved by the FDA and subject to conditions and exceptions common to agreements of this type. In September 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal with the Delaware District Court, which the Delaware District Court granted and dismissed the case without prejudice.

And finally in February 2023, we received a Paragraph IV certification notice letter regarding an ANDA submitted to the FDA by Cipla, Ltd. and Cipla USA, Inc. (individually and collectively referred to as Cipla) requesting approval to market a generic version of CABOMETYX tablets. In response, we filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Cipla in the Delaware District Court in March 2023, and all proceedings in our litigation against Cipla were stayed pursuant to an order of the Delaware District Court in May 2023.

We cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these ANDA submissions and/or any related lawsuits or provide assurance that these lawsuits will prevent the introduction of a generic version of CABOMETYX for any particular length of time, or at all. For a more detailed discussion of these litigation matters, see “Legal Proceedings” in Part I, Item 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In the EU, cabozantinib is protected by issued patents covering the composition of matter and methods of use. The issued composition of matter patent would expire in September 2024, but we have applied for and either have obtained, or expect to obtain Supplementary Protection Certificates in the EU to extend the term to 2029. In addition to the composition of matter patent, the table below includes certain later-expiring patents directed to the commercial product, including, particular salts, polymorphs, formulations, or use of the compound in the treatment of specified diseases or conditions.

Similarly, in Japan, cabozantinib is protected by issued patents covering the composition of matter, and salts thereof, as well as pharmaceutical compositions and related methods of use, and Takeda has applied for patent term extension in Japan to extend the term to 2029. Foreign counterparts of the issued U.S. and European composition of matter patents have been issued in Australia and Canada and are anticipated to expire in 2024. We have other filed patent applications and issued patents in the U.S. and other selected countries covering certain synthetic methods, salts, polymorphs, formulations, prodrugs, metabolites and combinations of cabozantinib that, if issued, are anticipated to expire as late as 2037. Outside the U.S. and Japan, cabozantinib is licensed to Ipsen, and in Japan, cabozantinib is licensed to Takeda, each in accordance with the respective collaboration agreements. A discussion of risks and uncertainties that may affect our patent position and other proprietary rights is set forth in “Risk Factors,” contained in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Zanzalintinib and Other Product Candidates

We also have issued patents and pending patent applications, and will continue to file new patent applications, in the U.S., the EU and other selected countries covering our other product candidates in clinical and/or preclinical development, including zanzalintinib, XB002 and XL309. Zanzalintinib is covered by U.S. Patent No. 11,542,259, and we have pending patent applications in the U.S. and other selected countries covering the composition of matter, certain synthetic methods, salts, polymorphs, formulations and combinations of zanzalintinib that, if issued, are anticipated to expire between 2039 and 2044, excluding any potential patent term adjustments and/or extensions.

We have obtained licenses from various parties that give us rights to technologies that we deem to be necessary or desirable for our research and development. These licenses (both exclusive and non-exclusive) may require us to pay royalties as well as upfront and milestone payments.

We require our scientific personnel to maintain laboratory notebooks and other research records in accordance with our policies, which are designed to strengthen and support our intellectual property protection. In addition to our patented intellectual property, we also rely on trade secrets and other proprietary information, especially when we do not believe that patent protection is appropriate or can be obtained. We also require all of our employees and consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors who receive proprietary information from us to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships with us. These agreements provide that all proprietary information developed or made known to the individual during the individual’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances. Furthermore, our agreements with employees and, in most circumstances, our agreements with consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors expressly provide that all inventions, concepts, developments, copyrights, trademarks or other intellectual property developed by an employee during the employment period or developed by a service provider during the service period or utilizing our proprietary drugs or information, shall be our exclusive property. There can be no assurance, however, that these agreements will provide meaningful protection or adequate remedies for our trade secrets in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of such information.

Human Capital Management

Our Employees and Commitment to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

As of December 31, 2023, we had 1,310 employees, representing a 7.1% increase in our employee workforce as compared to December 31, 2022. Of these employees, 672 are members of our research and development teams and 638 are members of our commercial, general and administrative teams. Of these employees, 242 hold Ph.D. degrees, 31 hold M.D. (or foreign equivalent) degrees, 41 hold PharmD degrees and 119 hold other professional degrees such as a J.D. or M.B.A. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we consider our employee relations to be good.

During the past five years, our employee turnover has remained consistently below average for the U.S. life sciences industry generally. We continually assess employee turnover, recruitment initiatives, compensation and benefits programs, safety in performing critical laboratory work, diversity and other matters relevant to human capital management, and we review results with our Board of Directors on a periodic basis.

We are an equal opportunity employer and maintain policies that prohibit unlawful discrimination based on race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity/expression, national origin/ancestry, age, disability, marital and veteran status. We are proud to employ a diverse workforce that, as of December 31, 2023, was 59% non-white and 51% women. In addition, as of December 31, 2023, 53% of our positions that manage other employees directly were held by non-whites and 44% were held by women, and women made up 33% of our senior leadership team. We strive to build and nurture a culture where all employees feel empowered to be their authentic selves. We respect and appreciate each employee’s unique perspective and experiences, and value their contributions to our mission. It is important that we celebrate, encourage and support similarities and differences to drive innovation for the benefit of our patients, employees and community.

In January 2024, we announced and implemented a restructuring plan, including a reduction of our employee workforce by approximately 175 employees, or 13% of our total headcount.

Culture, Compensation and Benefits

At Exelixis, we value being exceptional in what we do and how we lead, excelling for patients by going the extra mile to care for them and exceeding together as a business and contributor to the scientific community. We strive to live these values every day across the company, integrating them into everything from our interview, hiring and onboarding processes, to our performance evaluation, rewards and promotion programs.

We provide generous compensation packages designed to attract and retain high-quality employees, and all of our employees are eligible for cash bonuses and grants of long-term incentive awards. We regularly evaluate our compensation programs with an independent compensation consultant and utilize industry benchmarking in an effort to ensure they are competitive with the biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies against which we compete for talent, as well as fair and equitable across our workforce with respect to gender, race and other personal characteristics. We utilize a third-party firm to conduct an annual pay equity analysis as part of our commitment to fair compensation for all employees; our most recent analysis demonstrated no gender or ethnicity-based disparities and a gender pay parity ratio of 1:1. In addition, we are proud to provide a variety of programs and services to help employees meet and balance their needs at work, at home and in life, including an attractive mix of healthcare, insurance and other benefit plans. We deliver a benefits program that is designed to keep our employees and their families mentally, physically and emotionally healthy, which includes not only medical, dental and vision benefits, but also a wellness subsidy program, virtual and onsite fitness classes, adoption assistance, mental health coverage, subsidized commuter benefits and other wellness benefits. Our inclusive benefits are also designed to support family life with options including, among others, generous parental leave policies, grandparent leave, adoption, surrogacy and fertility programs, new parent and nursing mother support programs, mental health services, childcare tuition subsidy and tutoring services, dependent care for children and adults, family care coordination, and pet insurance. For a discussion of workplace safety measures we have taken, see “—Environmental, Health and Safety.”

Beyond compensation and benefits, we also value career development for all employees, and we offer a tuition reimbursement program, as well as professional development courses ranging from technical training, competency-based workshops and leadership development programs facilitated by external partners who are experts in their respective fields. Managers also take an active role in identifying individualized development plans to assist their employees in realizing their full potential and creating opportunities for promotions and added responsibilities that enhance the engagement and retention of our workforce.

Corporate Information

We were incorporated in Delaware in November 1994 as Exelixis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and changed our name to Exelixis, Inc. in February 2000. Our principal executive offices are located at 1851 Harbor Bay Parkway, Alameda, California 94502. Our telephone number is (650) 837-7000. We maintain a site on the worldwide web at www.exelixis.com; however, information found on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.

We make available free of charge on or through our website our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The SEC maintains a site on the worldwide web that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding our filings at www.sec.gov.