SSR MINING INC
For the period ended Mar 31, 2025. Filed May 6, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Mar 31, 2025 · Filed May 6, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 2. Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Çöpler, Türkiye
| Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Data | 2025 (1) | 2024 | Change (%) | ||||
| Gold produced (oz) | — | 21,827 | (100.0)% | ||||
| Gold sold (oz) | — | 23,960 | (100.0)% | ||||
| Average realized gold price ($/oz sold) | $— | $2,013 | (100.0)% | ||||
| Ore mined (kt) | — | 266 | (100.0)% | ||||
| Waste removed (kt) | — | 3,571 | (100.0)% | ||||
| Total material mined (kt) | — | 3,837 | (100.0)% | ||||
| Ore milled (kt) | — | 343 | (100.0)% | ||||
| Gold mill feed grade (g/t) | — | 2.39 | (100.0)% | ||||
| Gold recovery (%) | — | 78.9 | (100.0)% | ||||
| Ore stacked (kt) | — | 184 | (100.0)% | ||||
| Gold grade stacked (g/t) | — | 1.17 | (100.0)% | ||||
| Cost of sales (2) | $— | $24,423 | (100.0)% | ||||
| Cost of sales ($/oz gold sold) (2) | $ | N/A | $1,019 | —% | |||
| Cash costs ($/oz gold sold) (3) | $ | N/A | $1,020 | —% | |||
| AISC ($/oz gold sold) (3) | $ | N/A | $1,573 | —% | |||
(1)Operations at Çöpler were suspended on February 13, 2024 following the Çöpler Incident and have not restarted.
(3)The Company reports the non-GAAP financial measures of cash costs and AISC per ounce of gold sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at Çöpler. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for an explanation of these financial measures and a reconciliation to cost of sales, which is the comparable GAAP financial measure.
Operations remained suspended following the Çöpler Incident. Care and maintenance expense of $35.8 million was recorded which represents direct costs not associated with the environmental reclamation and remediation costs and depreciation.
Marigold, USA
| Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Data | 2025 | 2024 | Change (%) |
| Gold produced (oz) | 38,586 | 34,680 | 11.3% |
| Gold sold (oz) | 40,408 | 36,869 | 9.6% |
| Average realized gold price ($/oz sold) | $2,899 | $2,074 | 39.8% |
| Ore mined (kt) | 5,356 | 5,721 | (6.4)% |
| Waste removed (kt) | 20,455 | 20,587 | (0.6)% |
| Total material mined (kt) | 25,811 | 26,309 | (1.9)% |
| Ore stacked (kt) | 5,356 | 5,721 | (6.4)% |
| Gold grade stacked (g/t) | 0.33 | 0.13 | 153.8% |
| Cost of sales (1) | $58,726 | $49,071 | 19.7% |
| Cost of sales ($/oz gold sold) (1) | $1,453 | $1,331 | 9.2% |
| Cash costs ($/oz gold sold) (2) | $1,454 | $1,333 | 9.1% |
| AISC ($/oz gold sold) (2) | $1,765 | $1,430 | 23.4% |
(2)The Company reports the non-GAAP financial measures of cash costs and AISC per ounce of gold sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at Marigold. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for an explanation of these financial measures and a reconciliation to Cost of sales, which is the comparable GAAP financial measure.
Gold production increased 11.3% due to higher grade ore stacked. Revenue increased by $40.5 million, or 52.8%, of which $33.3 million was a result of higher average realized gold price and $7.2 million was the result of more gold ounces sold. Cost of sales increased by $9.7 million, or 19.7%, due to more gold ounces sold and higher mining costs as a result of increased higher royalty expense due to higher gold prices maintenance costs. Cost of sales per ounce of gold sold and cash costs per ounce of gold sold increased 9.2% and 9.1%, respectively, due to the higher mining costs discussed above, partially offset by more gold ounces sold. AISC per ounce of gold sold increased 23.4% as a result of higher cash costs and sustaining capital expenditures.
Cripple Creek & Victor, USA
| Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|---|---|
| Operating Data (1) | 2025 |
| Gold produced (oz) | 11,282 |
| Gold sold (oz) | 11,300 |
| Average realized gold price ($/oz sold) | $3,067 |
| Ore mined (kt) | 1,824 |
| Waste removed (kt) | 1,571 |
| Total material mined (kt) | 3,395 |
| Ore stacked (kt) | 1,859 |
| Gold grade stacked (g/t) | 0.36 |
| Cost of sales (2) | $17,966 |
| Cost of sales ($/oz gold sold) (2) | $1,590 |
| Cash costs ($/oz gold sold) (3) | $1,571 |
| AISC ($/oz gold sold) (3) | $1,774 |
(1)The operating data presented represents the period from February 28, 2025 to March 31, 2025, the period for which the Company was entitled to the economic benefits of CC&V following the acquisition.
(3)The Company reports the non-GAAP financial measures of cash costs and AISC per ounce of gold sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at CC&V. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for an explanation of these financial measures and a reconciliation to Cost of sales, which is the comparable GAAP financial measure.
Period Beginning February 28, 2025 to March 31, 2025
The Company acquired CC&V on February 28, 2025 and thus there were no historical results reported for the three months ended March 31, 2024. See Note 3 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details related to the CC&V acquisition.
Seabee, Canada
| Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Data | 2025 | 2024 | Change (%) |
| Gold produced (oz) | 26,001 | 23,773 | 9.4% |
| Gold sold (oz) | 26,000 | 28,450 | (8.6)% |
| Average realized gold price ($/oz sold) | $2,934 | $2,070 | 41.7% |
| Ore mined (kt) | 82 | 104 | (21.2)% |
| Ore milled (kt) | 90 | 115 | (21.7)% |
| Gold mill feed grade (g/t) | 9.00 | 6.51 | 38.2% |
| Gold recovery (%) | 97.3 | 96.4 | 0.9% |
| Cost of sales (1) | $23,130 | $24,433 | (5.3)% |
| Cost of sales ($/oz gold sold) (1) | $890 | $859 | 3.6% |
| Cash costs ($/oz gold sold) (2) | $890 | $859 | 3.6% |
| AISC ($/oz gold sold) (2) | $1,374 | $1,416 | (3.0)% |
(2)The Company reports the non-GAAP financial measures of cash costs and AISC per ounce of gold sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at Seabee. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for an explanation of these financial measures and a reconciliation to Cost of sales, which is the comparable GAAP financial measure.
Gold production increased 9.4% as a result of higher gold mill feed grade and gold recovery rates. Revenue increased by $17.2 million, or 29.0%, of which $22.5 million was a result of higher average realized gold price, partially offset by $5.3 million as a result of fewer gold ounces sold. In the first quarter of 2024, gold sold exceeded gold production due to the timing of sales of finished goods inventory. Cost of sales decreased by $1.3 million, or 5.3%, as a result of fewer gold ounces sold. Cost of sales per ounce of gold sold and cash costs per ounce of gold sold increased by 3.6% and 3.6%, respectively, due to higher milling costs. AISC per ounce of gold sold decreased 3.0% due to lower sustaining capital expenditures as a result of drills and bolters acquired in 2024.
Puna, Argentina
| Three Months Ended March 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Data | 2025 | 2024 | Change (%) |
| Silver produced ('000 oz) | 2,505 | 1,915 | 30.8% |
| Silver sold ('000 oz) | 2,374 | 1,659 | 43.1% |
| Lead produced ('000 lb) | 11,489 | 9,998 | 14.9% |
| Lead sold ('000 lb) | 12,053 | 8,666 | 39.1% |
| Zinc produced ('000 lb) | 758 | 1,217 | (37.7)% |
| Zinc sold ('000 lb) | 262 | 510 | (48.6)% |
| Gold equivalent sold (oz) (1) | 26,477 | 18,704 | 41.6% |
| Average realized silver price ($/oz) | $32.47 | $22.18 | 46.4% |
| Ore mined (kt) | 627 | 263 | 138.4% |
| Waste removed (kt) | 1,089 | 1,510 | (27.9)% |
| Total material mined (kt) | 1,716 | 1,773 | (3.2)% |
| Ore milled (kt) | 454 | 417 | 8.9% |
| Silver mill feed grade (g/t) | 177.79 | 148.51 | 19.7% |
| Lead mill feed grade (%) | 1.21 | 1.16 | 4.3% |
| Zinc mill feed grade (%) | 0.19 | 0.27 | (29.6)% |
| Silver recovery (%) | 96.6 | 96.2 | 0.4% |
| Lead recovery (%) | 94.5 | 93.9 | 0.6% |
| Zinc recovery (%) | 39.6 | 49.2 | (19.5)% |
| Cost of sales (2) | $36,819 | $27,974 | 31.6% |
| Cost of sales ($/oz silver sold) (2) | $15.51 | $16.87 | (8.1)% |
| Cost of sales ($/oz gold equivalent sold) (1, 2) | $1,391 | $1,496 | (7.0)% |
| Cash costs ($/oz silver sold) (3) | $10.97 | $12.29 | (10.7)% |
| Cash costs ($/oz gold equivalent sold) (1, 3) | $983 | $1,090 | (9.8)% |
| AISC ($/oz silver sold) (3) | $13.16 | $15.61 | (15.7)% |
| AISC ($/oz gold equivalent sold) (1, 3) | $1,180 | $1,385 | (14.8)% |
(1)Gold equivalent ounces are calculated multiplying the silver ounces by the ratio of the silver price to the gold price, using the average LBMA prices for the period. The Company does not include by-products in the gold equivalent ounce calculations.
(3)The Company reports the non-GAAP financial measures of cash costs and AISC per ounce of silver sold to manage and evaluate operating performance at Puna. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for an explanation of these financial measures and a reconciliation to Cost of sales, which is the comparable GAAP financial measure.
Silver production increased 30.8% due to higher silver mill feed grade and more ore tonnes milled. Revenue increased by $42.4 million, or 92.5%, of which $24.4 million was the result of higher average realized silver price and $19.1 million as a result of higher volume of silver and lead concentrate sold, partially offset by $0.8 million as a result of lower average realized lead price and $0.3 million decrease as a result of lower zinc concentrate sold. Cost of sales increased by $8.8 million, or 31.6%, as a result of higher ore tonnes mined and silver ounces sold. Cost of sales per ounce of silver sold and cash costs per ounce of silver sold decreased by 8.1% and 10.7%, respectively, due to fewer waste tonnes mined and higher silver grade. AISC per ounce of silver sold decreased 15.7% due to higher silver mill feed grade and lower sustaining capital expenditures.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.