MORGAN STANLEY

6. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Fair Values of Derivative Contracts

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements(Unaudited)

1. Amounts relate to master netting agreements and collateral agreements that have been determined by the Firm to be legally enforceable in the event of default but where certain other netting criteria are not met in accordance with applicable offsetting accounting guidance.

See Note 4 for information related to the unsettled fair value of futures contracts not designated as accounting hedges, which are excluded from the previous tables.

Notionals of Derivative Contracts

The notional amounts of derivative contracts generally overstate the Firm’s exposure. In most circumstances, notional amounts are used only as a reference point from

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements(Unaudited)

which to calculate amounts owed between the parties to the contract. Furthermore, notional amounts do not reflect the benefit of legally enforceable netting arrangements or risk mitigating transactions.

For a discussion of the Firm’s derivative instruments and hedging activities, see Note 6 to the financial statements in the 2025 Form 10-K.

Gains (Losses) on Accounting Hedges

1. During the nine months ended September 30, 2026, there were no forecasted transactions that failed to occur. The net gains (losses) associated with cash flow hedges expected to be reclassified from AOCI within 12 months as of September 30, 2026, is approximately $(233) million. The maximum length of time over which forecasted cash flows are hedged is 30 months.

Fair Value Hedges—Hedged Items

1. Carrying amount represents the amortized cost. As of September 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, the amortized cost of the portfolio layer method closed portfolios was $829 million and $589 million, respectively. The Firm designated $1,518 million and $703 million as hedged amounts as of September 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, respectively, representing the total notional value of all outstanding layers in each portfolio, including both spot-starting and forward-starting layers. The cumulative amount of basis adjustments was $(12) million as of September 30, 2026 and $2 million as of December 31, 2025. Refer to Note 2 to the financial statements in the 2025 Form 10-K and Note 7 herein for additional information.

Gains (Losses) on Economic Hedges of Loans and DCP

1. Amounts related to hedges of certain held-for-investment and held-for-sale loans.

Net Derivative Liabilities and Collateral Posted

The previous table presents the aggregate fair value of certain derivative contracts that contain credit risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position for which the Firm has posted collateral in the normal course of business.

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements(Unaudited)

Incremental Collateral and Termination Payments upon Potential Future Ratings Downgrade

1. Amount represents arrangements between the Firm and other parties where upon the downgrade of one party, the downgraded party must deliver collateral to the other party. These bilateral downgrade arrangements are used by the Firm to manage the risk of counterparty downgrades.

The additional collateral or termination payments that may be called in the event of a future credit rating downgrade vary by contract and can be based on ratings by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., S&P Global Ratings and/or other rating agencies. The previous table shows the future potential collateral amounts and termination payments that could be called or required by counterparties or exchange and clearing organizations in the event of one-notch or two-notch downgrade scenarios based on the relevant contractual downgrade triggers.

Maximum Potential Payout/Notional of Credit Protection Sold 1

Fair Value Asset (Liability) of Credit Protection Sold 1

1. Investment grade/non-investment grade determination is based on the internal credit rating of the reference obligation. Internal credit ratings serve as the CRM’s assessment of credit risk and the basis for a comprehensive credit limits framework used to control credit risk. The Firm uses quantitative models and judgment to estimate the various risk parameters related to each obligor.

Protection Purchased with CDS

The Firm enters into credit derivatives, principally CDS, under which it receives or provides protection against the risk of default on a set of debt obligations issued by a specified reference entity or entities. A majority of the Firm’s counterparties for these derivatives are banks, broker-dealers, and insurance and other financial institutions.

The fair value amounts as shown in the previous tables are prior to cash collateral or counterparty netting. For further information on credit derivatives and other credit contracts, see Note 6 to the financial statements in the 2025 Form 10-K.