EQUUS TOTAL RETURN, INC.

** (1) Description of Business and Basis of Presentation**

**Description of Business—**Equus Total Return, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Equus” the “Company” and the “Fund”), a Delaware corporation, was formed by Equus Investments II, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on August 16, 1991. On July 1, 1992, the Partnership was reorganized and all of the assets and liabilities of the Partnership were transferred to the Fund in exchange for shares of common stock of the Fund. Our shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol ‘EQS’. On August 11, 2006, our shareholders approved the change of the Fund’s investment strategy to a total return investment objective. This strategy seeks to provide the highest total return, consisting of capital appreciation and current income. In connection with this strategic investment change, the shareholders also approved the change of name from Equus II Incorporated to Equus Total Return, Inc. As of September 30, 2025, we had 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized for issuance, of which 13,966,696 shares of common stock and no shares of preferred stock were outstanding.

We attempt to maximize the return to stockholders in the form of current investment income and long-term capital gains by investing in the debt and equity securities of companies with a total enterprise value between $5.0 million and $75.0 million, although we may engage in transactions with smaller or larger investee companies from time to time. We seek to invest primarily in companies pursuing growth either through acquisition or organically, leveraged buyouts, management buyouts and recapitalizations of existing businesses or special situations. Our income-producing investments consist principally of debt securities including subordinated debt, debt convertible into common or preferred stock, or debt combined with warrants and common and preferred stock. Debt and preferred equity financing may also be used to create long-term capital appreciation through the exercise and sale of warrants received in connection with the financing. We seek to achieve capital appreciation by making investments in equity and equity-oriented securities issued by privately-owned companies in transactions negotiated directly with such companies. Given market conditions over the past several years and the performance of our portfolio, our Management and Board of Directors believe it prudent to continue to review alternatives to refine and further clarify the current strategies.

We elected to be treated as a BDC under the Investment Company Act of 1940 Act (“1940 Act”), although our shareholders authorized us to withdraw this election in previous years (which authorization has since expired) and may do so again in the future. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2024, we qualified as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) for federal income tax purposes and, therefore, were not required to pay corporate income taxes on any income or gains that we would have distributed distribute to our stockholders. During the fourth quarter of 2024, we elected to not qualify as a RIC and, consequently, we will be subject to normal corporate rates of taxation of our income and gains and will not be permitted to deduct distributions paid to our stockholders.

From time to time, we may have certain wholly-owned taxable subsidiaries (“Taxable Subsidiaries”) each of which may hold one or more portfolio investments listed on our Schedules of Investments. Although we are no longer a RIC, the purpose of these Taxable Subsidiaries is to permit us to hold certain income-producing investments or portfolio companies organized as limited liability companies, or LLCs, (or other forms of pass-through entities) and still satisfy the RIC tax requirement that at least 90% of our gross revenue for income tax purposes must consist of investment income. Absent the Taxable Subsidiaries, a portion of the gross income of these income-producing investments or of any LLC (or other pass-through entity) portfolio investment, as the case may be, would flow through directly to us for the 90% test. To the extent that such income did not consist of investment income, it could jeopardize our ability to requalify as a RIC and, therefore, cause us to incur federal income taxes as described above. The income of the LLCs (or other pass-through entities) owned by Taxable Subsidiaries is taxed to the Taxable Subsidiaries and does not flow through to us, thereby helping us obtain (or preserve, as the case may be) RIC status and the resultant tax advantages. We do not consolidate the Taxable Subsidiaries for income tax purposes, with the exception of Texas Margin Tax, which is an entity level tax. The Taxable Subsidiaries may generate income tax expense because of the Taxable Subsidiaries’ ownership of the portfolio companies. We reflect any such income tax expense on our Statements of Operations.

**Impact of Economic and Geopolitical Events on the Oil and Gas Sector—**Beginning in the second quarter of 2022, crude prices began a steady decline following increases that were largely due to increased post-Covid demand and the buildup and subsequent invasion of Ukraine by Russian forces. Prices began a rise and fall in successive quarters between the third quarters of 2023 and the fourth quarter of 2024 before experiencing a slow and steady decline from the end of 2024 and throughout 2025, and stood at $63.17 as of September 30, 2025. Natural gas prices experienced high volatility in 2022 before collapsing in 2023 and then steadily increasing each quarter thereafter until the first quarter of 2025 before declining in the second and third quarters of 2025, finishing the quarter ended September 30, 2025 at $3.12 per MMBTU. Relative oil and gas price stability has been a significant factor in increased consolidation activity in the Williston Basin region in North Dakota where Morgan E&P, Inc. holds its development rights.

Basis of Presentation—In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), we do not consolidate portfolio company investments, including those in which we have a controlling interest. Our interim unaudited financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), for interim financial information and in accordance with the requirements of reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X, under the Exchange Act. Accordingly, they are unaudited and exclude some disclosures required for annual financial statements. We believe that we have made all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, necessary for the fair statement of these interim financial statements.

The results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2025 are not necessarily indicative of results that ultimately may be achieved for the remainder of the year. The interim unaudited financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Fund’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, as filed with the SEC.

(2) Liquidity and Financing Arrangements; Going Concern

Liquidity—There are several factors that may materially affect our liquidity during the reasonably foreseeable future. We are evaluating the impact of current market conditions on our portfolio company valuations and their ability to provide current income. We have followed valuation techniques in a consistent manner; however, we are cognizant of current market conditions that might affect future valuations of portfolio securities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—As of September 30, 2025, we had cash and cash equivalents of $0.3 million.

As of December 31, 2024, we had cash and cash equivalents of $0.3 million.

Dividends—So long as we remain a BDC, we will pay out net investment income and/or realized net capital gains, if any, on an annual basis as required under the 1940 Act.

Investment Commitments—Under certain circumstances, we may be called on to make follow-on investments in certain portfolio companies. If we do not have sufficient funds to make follow-on investments, the portfolio company in need of the investment may be negatively impacted. Also, our equity interest in the estimated fair value of the portfolio company could be reduced. We had no follow-on commitments as of September 30, 2025.

Asset Coverage Ratio—Under the 1940 Act, BDCs are required to have an asset coverage ratio of 200%, meaning that the maximum debt that may be incurred by a BDC is the BDC’s net asset value. Pursuant to amendments made to the 1940 Act in March 2018, BDCs may now, with stockholder or board of directors approval, reduce this ratio to 150%, meaning that the maximum debt that may be incurred by a BDC is two times the BDC’s net asset value. In November 2019, we obtained approval of our shareholders to reduce our asset coverage ratio to 150%. This authorization permits Equus to borrow up to twice the value of the Fund’s net assets. Other than the convertible note financing undertaken in February 2025 described underIssuance of Equus Securities in Note 5 below, we have not yet undertaken any other additional borrowings.

Certain Risks and Uncertainties and Going Concern—Market and economic volatility which has become endemic in the past few years, together with the economic dislocation caused by the onset of the coronavirus, has constrained the availability of debt financing for small and medium-sized companies such as Equus and its portfolio companies. Such debt financing generally has shorter maturities, higher interest rates and fees, and more restrictive terms than debt facilities available in the past. In addition, during these years and continuing into the third quarter of 2025, the price of our common stock remained well below our net asset value, thereby making it undesirable to issue additional shares of our common stock below net asset value.

Because of these challenges, our near-term strategies shifted from originating debt and equity investments to preserving liquidity necessary to meet our operational needs. Key initiatives that we have previously undertaken to provide necessary liquidity include monetizations, the suspension of dividends and the internalization of management. We are also evaluating potential opportunities that could enable us to effect a change to our business and become an operating company as described in Note 6 –Conversion to an Operating Company.

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of the Fund have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and other commitments in the normal course of business.

Our cash and cash equivalents totaled $0.3 million as of September 30, 2025. We do not currently have the necessary cash on hand and/or projected future cash flows to fund our operating activities. It is possible the Fund will require loans, capital investment from one or more sources, or will be required to dispose of certain of its portfolio investments, to cover a potential cash shortfall. The Fund does not presently have any existing commitments to fund any such shortfall, should it occur, and cannot guarantee that it will be able to execute on such plans in the future. Because we do not currently have committed financing to fund our operations for at least twelve months from the issuance of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern.

The unaudited condensed financial statements do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets and their carrying amount, or the amount and classification of liabilities that may result should the Fund be unable to continue as a going concern.

(3) Significant Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of our financial statements:

**Use of Estimates—**The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Although we believe the estimates and assumptions used in preparing these financial statements and related notes are reasonable in light of known facts and circumstances, actual results could differ from those estimates. We have identified valuation of investments and revenue recognition as our most critical accounting estimates.

**Consolidation—**In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933, we do not consolidate portfolio company investments. Under Accounting Standards Committee (“ASC”) 946, we are precluded from consolidating any entity other than another investment company, except that ASC 946 provides for the consolidation of a controlled operating company that provides substantially all of its services to the investment company or its consolidated subsidiaries.

Valuation of Investments—For most of our investments, market quotations are not available. With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available or when such market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, our Board has approved a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:

During the first twelve months after an investment is made, we rely on the original investment amount to determine the fair value unless significant developments have occurred during this twelve-month period which would indicate a material effect on the portfolio company (such as results of operations or changes in general market conditions).

Investments are valued utilizing various methodologies and approaches, including a yield analysis, enterprise value (“EV”) analysis, net asset value analysis, liquidation analysis, discounted cash flow analysis, or a combination of methods, as appropriate. The yield analysis uses loan spreads and other relevant information implied by market data involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. Under the EV analysis, the EV of a portfolio company is first determined and allocated over the portfolio company’s securities in order of their preference relative to one another (i.e., “waterfall” allocation). To determine the EV, we typically use a market multiples approach that considers relevant and applicable market trading data of guideline public companies, transaction metrics from precedent M&A transactions and/or a discounted cash flow analysis. The net asset value analysis is used to derive a value of an underlying investment (such as real estate property) by dividing a relevant earnings stream by an appropriate capitalization rate. For this purpose, we consider capitalization rates for similar properties as may be obtained from guideline public companies and/or relevant transactions. The liquidation analysis is intended to approximate the net recovery value of an investment based on, among other things, assumptions regarding liquidation proceeds based on a hypothetical liquidation of a portfolio company’s assets. The discounted cash flow analysis uses valuation techniques to convert future cash flows or earnings to a range of fair values from which a single estimate may be derived utilizing an appropriate discount rate. The measurement is based on the net present value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts.

In estimating the fair value of our equity interest in Morgan, we have given more emphasis to an income approach that examines expected cash flows from the development of leasehold interests held by Morgan. Our management received advice and assistance from a third-party valuation firm to support our determination of the fair value of this investment.

In applying these methodologies, additional factors that we consider in fair value pricing our investments may include, as we deem relevant: security covenants, call protection provisions, and information rights; the nature and realizable value of any collateral; the portfolio company’s ability to make payments; the principal markets in which the portfolio company does business; publicly available financial ratios of peer companies; the principal market; and enterprise values, among other factors. Also, any failure by a portfolio company to achieve its business plan or obtain and maintain its financing arrangements could result in increased volatility and result in a significant and rapid change in its value.

Our general intent is to hold our loans to maturity when appraising our privately held debt investments. As such, we believe that the fair value will not exceed the cost of the investment. However, in addition to the previously described analysis involving allocation of value to the debt instrument, we perform a yield analysis assuming a hypothetical current sale of the security to determine if a debt security has been impaired. The yield analysis considers changes in interest rates and changes in leverage levels of the portfolio company as compared to the market interest rates and leverage levels. Assuming the credit quality of the portfolio company remains stable, the Fund will use the value determined by the yield analysis as the fair value for that security if less than the cost of the investment.

We record unrealized depreciation on investments when we determine that the fair value of a security is less than its cost basis and will record unrealized appreciation when we determine that the fair value is greater than its cost basis.

Fair Value Measurement—Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and sets out a fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Inputs are broadly defined as assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies.

Level 3—Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. The inputs into the determination of fair value are based upon the best information under the circumstances and may require significant management judgment or estimation.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the investment.

Investments for which prices are not observable are generally private investments in the debt and equity securities of operating companies. A primary valuation method used to estimate the fair value of these Level 3 investments is the discounted cash flow method (although a liquidation analysis, option theoretical, or other methodology may be used when more appropriate). The discounted cash flow approach to determine fair value (or a range of fair values) involves applying an appropriate discount rate(s) to the estimated future cash flows using various relevant factors depending on investment type, including comparing the latest arm’s length or market transactions involving the subject security to the selected benchmark credit spread, assumed growth rate (in cash flows), and capitalization rates/multiples (for determining terminal values of underlying portfolio companies). The valuation based on the inputs determined to be the most reasonable and probable is used as the fair value of the investment. In the case of our investment in Morgan E&P, Inc. (“Morgan”), we also examine acreage values in comparable transactions and assess the impact upon the working interests held by Morgan. The determination of fair value using these methodologies may take into consideration a range of factors including, but not limited to, the price at which the investment was acquired, the nature of the investment, local market conditions, trading values on public exchanges for comparable securities, current and projected operating performance, financing transactions subsequent to the acquisition of the investment and anticipated financing transactions after the valuation date. In the case of our holding of shares and warrants in General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. (“GEVI”), we examined the trading price of the GEVI shares on the relevant measurement date and, in the case of the warrants, employed a Black-Scholes analysis with a 2-year stock variance to determine value.

To assess the reasonableness of the discounted cash flow approach, the fair value of equity securities, including warrants, in portfolio companies may also consider the market approach—that is, through analyzing and applying to the underlying portfolio companies, market valuation multiples of publicly-traded firms engaged in businesses similar to those of the portfolio companies. The market approach to determining the fair value of a portfolio company’s equity security (or securities) will typically involve: (1) applying to the portfolio company’s trailing twelve months (or current year projected) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”) a low to high range of enterprise value to EBITDA multiples that are derived from an analysis of publicly-traded comparable companies, in order to arrive at a range of enterprise values for the portfolio company; (2) subtracting from the range of calculated enterprise values the outstanding balances of any debt or equity securities that would be senior in right of payment to the equity securities we hold; and (3) multiplying the range of equity values derived therefrom by our ownership share of such equity tranche in order to arrive at a range of fair values for our equity security (or securities). Application of these valuation methodologies involves a significant degree of judgment by Management.

Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of Level 3 investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for such investments and may differ materially from the values that may ultimately be received or settled. Further, such investments are generally subject to legal and other restrictions or otherwise are less liquid than publicly traded instruments. If we were required to liquidate a portfolio investment in a forced or liquidation sale, we might realize significantly less than the value at which such investment had previously been recorded. With respect to Level 3 investments, where sufficient market quotations are not readily available or for which no or an insufficient number of indicative prices from pricing services or brokers or dealers have been received, we undertake, on a quarterly basis, our valuation process as described above.

We assess the levels of the investments at each measurement date, and transfers between levels are recognized on the subsequent measurement date closest in time to the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were no transfers to or from Level 3 for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and for the year ended December 31, 2024.

As of September 30, 2025, investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized in the tables below based on the lowest level of significant input to the valuations:

As of December 31, 2024, investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized in the tables below based on the lowest level of significant input to the valuations:

The following table provides a reconciliation of fair value changes during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 for all investments for which we determine fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors:

The following table provides a reconciliation of fair value changes during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 for all investments for which we determine fair value using unobservable (Level 3) factors:

Fair value measurements can be sensitive to changes in one or more of the valuation inputs. Changes in discount rates, EBITDA or EBITDA multiples (or revenue or revenue multiples), each in isolation, may change the fair value of certain of our investments. Generally, an increase/(decrease) in market yields, discount rates, or an increase/(decrease) in EBITDA or EBITDA multiples (or revenue or revenue multiples) may result in a corresponding increase/(decrease), respectively, in the fair value of certain of our investments. In the case of our holdings in Morgan, we also consider acreage value, proved reserve multiples, daily production multiples, and discount rates.

Finally, industry trends, market forecasts, and comparable transactions in sectors in which we hold a Level 3 investment are also taken into account when assessing the value of these investments.

The following table summarizes the significant non-observable inputs in the fair value measurements of our Level 3 investments by category of investment and valuation technique as of September 30, 2025 (fair value expressed in thousands; acreage range expressed in dollars and not rounded):

The following table summarizes the significant non-observable inputs in the fair value measurements of our Level 3 investments by category of investment and valuation technique as of December 31, 2024 (fair value expressed in thousands; acreage range expressed in dollars and not rounded):

The various weighted averages in the tables above were determined based on acreage, reserves, production and, in the case of discount rates, an arithmetic average of minimum and maximum rates. Because of the inherent uncertainty of the valuation of portfolio securities which do not have readily ascertainable market values, our fair value determinations may materially differ from the values that would have been used had a ready market existed for the securities.

We adjust our net asset value for the changes in the value of our publicly held securities, if applicable, and material changes in the value of private securities, generally determined on a quarterly basis or as announced in a press release, and report those amounts to Lipper Analytical Services, Inc. Our net asset value appears in various publications, includingBarron’s andThe Wall Street Journal.

Investment Transactions— Investment transactions are recorded at fair value on the trade date. Current-period changes in fair value of investments are reflected as a component of the net unrealized appreciation of portfolio securities on the Statements of Operations. The net change in unrealized appreciation primarily reflects the change in investment fair values as of the last business day of the reporting period, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized gains or losses for investments sold during the period. Realized gains or losses are recognized as the difference between the net proceeds received (excluding prepayment fees, if any) and the amortized cost basis of the investment using the specific identification method without regard to unrealized gains or losses previously recognized, and include investments written off during the period, net of recoveries. As of September 30, 2025, we have no assets going through foreclosure. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are computed on a specific identification basis.

We classify our investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. Under the 1940 Act, “Control Investments” are defined as investments in companies in which the Fund owns more than 25% of the voting securities or maintains greater than 50% of the board representation. Under the 1940 Act, “Affiliate Investments” are defined as those non-control investments in companies in which we own between 5% and 25% of the voting securities. Under the 1940 Act, “Non-affiliate Investments” are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.

Interest and Dividend Income Recognition—We record interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, on an accrual basis to the extent that we expect to collect such amounts. We accrete or amortize discounts and premiums on securities purchased over the life of the respective security using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion of discount and/or amortization of premium on debt securities. We stop accruing interest on investments when we determine that interest is no longer collectible. We may also impair the accrued interest when we determine that all or a portion of the current accrual is uncollectible. If we receive any cash after determining that interest is no longer collectible, we treat such cash as payment on the principal balance until the entire principal balance has been repaid, before we recognize any additional interest income. We will write off uncollectible interest upon the occurrence of a definitive event such as a sale, bankruptcy, or reorganization of the relevant portfolio interest. Dividend income is recorded as dividends are declared by the portfolio company or atthe point an obligation exists for the portfolio company to make adistribution.

Net Realized Gains or Losses and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation—Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the sale or redemption of an investment or a financial instrument and the cost basis of the investment or financial instrument, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments written-off during the period net of recoveries and realized gains or losses from in-kind redemptions. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation reflects the net change in the fair value of the portfolio company investments and financial instruments and the reclassification of any prior period unrealized appreciation or depreciation on exited investments and financial instruments to realized gains or losses.

**Payment in Kind Interest (PIK)—**From time to time, we have loans in our portfolio that may pay PIK interest. We add PIK interest, if any, computed at the contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, to the principal balance of the loan and recorded as interest income. If we regain our status as a RIC, we will be required to pay out to stockholders this non-cash source of income in the form of dividends even if we have not yet collected any cash in respect of such investments. To the extent we remain BDC and a RIC, we will continue to pay out net investment income and/or realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis as required under the 1940 Act.

Earnings Per Share—Basic and diluted per share calculations are computed utilizing the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share adjusts the basic EPS for the potential dilution that could occur if the Equus Note (1,333,333 shares) and Warrants (1,999,999 shares) were exercised or converted into common stock. The impact of the Equus Note and Warrants were anti-dilutive for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 due to the net loss for the periods.

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 respectively:

Distributable Earnings—The components that make up distributable earnings (accumulated undistributed deficit) on the Condensed Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 are as follows:

Taxes—Historically, the Company has filed an income tax return as a Regulated Investment Company. However, following the Company’s election not to qualify as a RIC in the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company is now classified as a C corporation for income tax purposes and is subject to guidance under ASC 740, accounting for income taxes.

The Company records income taxes for interim reporting periods based on an estimated annual effective tax rate. This estimated rate is reassessed each quarter and may fluctuate due to changes in forecasted annual operating income, adjustments to the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, and changes in actual or projected permanent book-to-tax differences. The Company’s effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was 0.0%, and accordingly, no income tax expense or benefit was recorded for the quarter.

The Company records deferred tax assets to the extent the Company believes these assets will more-likely-than-not be realized. In making such determinations, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company believes its deferred tax assets will more-likely-than-not be realized and has recorded a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets.

On July 4, 2025, Public Law No. 119-21, commonly referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “Act”), was enacted. Key provisions of the Act affecting the Company include: (i) a permanent reduction in the corporate tax rate, (ii) the permanent extension of 100% bonus depreciation for qualified property, and (iii) modifications to the calculation of the §163(j) business interest expense limitation.

In accordance with ASC 740, the Company recognized the effects of the new tax law in the period of enactment. The adoption of the Act did not result in any material impact to current or deferred income tax expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the Act on its financial statements and will update its estimates as additional guidance becomes available.

Texas margin tax applies to entities conducting business in Texas and is based on Texas-sourced taxable margin. Because the margin tax is calculated on a base that incorporates both revenue and expense elements, it is treated as an income tax under ASC 740. For the quarter ended September 30, 2025, no provision for margin tax expense has been recorded.

ASC Topic 740-10,*Income Taxes,*provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized in the financial statements when it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on technical merits. This guidance also addresses measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company has no material uncertain tax positions in its prior or current filings

Segments—Equus operates in a single segment with a principal investment objective to maximize total return from generating current income from debt investments and current income and capital appreciation from equity and equity-related investments. The Company’s Investment Committee and Chief Executive Officer collectively perform the function that allocates resources and assesses performance, and thus together, serve as the Company’s chief operating decision maker (the “CODM”). Among other metrics, the CODM uses net investment income as a primary GAAP profit or loss metric used in making operating decisions, which can be found on the Statement of Operations along with significant expenses. The measure of segment assets is reported on the Balance Sheets as total assets.

**Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash—**Cash includes unrestricted demand deposits at highly rated financial institutions and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The Company’s cash balances may exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insured limits from time to time. Although the Company bears risk to amounts in excess of those insured by the FDIC, it does not anticipate any losses as a result due to the financial position and creditworthiness of the depository institutions in which those deposits are held. We include our investing activities within cash flows from operations.

**Recent Accounting Standards—**We consider the applicability and impact of all accounting standard updates (“ASU”) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). ASUs not listed below were assessed and either determined to be not applicable or expected to have minimal impact on our financial statements.

Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted—In November 2024, FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses”. The amendments in this Update require disclosure, in the notes to financial statements, of specified information about certain costs and expenses. This update will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026. Early adoption is permitted. The Fund is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the financial statements.

In January 2025, FASB issued ASU 2025-01, “Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), Clarifying the Effective Date”. The amendment in this Update amends the effective date of Update 2024-03 to clarify that all public business entities are required to adopt the guidance in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026. Early adoption of Update 2024-03 is permitted. The Fund is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the financial statements.

In November 2024, FASB issued ASU 2024-04, “Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20), Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt Instruments”. The amendments in this Update clarify the requirements for determining whether certain settlements of convertible debt instruments should be accounted for as an induced conversion. Under the amendments, to account for a settlement of a convertible debt instrument as an induced conversion, an inducement offer is required to provide the debt holder with, at a minimum, the consideration (in form and amount) issuable under the conversion privileges provided in the terms of the instrument. An entity should assess whether this criterion is satisfied as of the date the inducement offer is accepted by the holder. If, when applying this criterion, the convertible debt instrument had been exchanged or modified (without being deemed substantially different) within the one-year period leading up to the offer acceptance date, an entity should compare the terms provided in the inducement offer with the terms that existed one year before the offer acceptance date. The amendments do not change the other criteria that are required to be satisfied to account for a settlement transaction as an induced conversion. The amendments in this Update also make additional clarifications to assist stakeholders in applying the guidance. Under the amendments, the incorporation, elimination, or modification of a VWAP formula does not automatically cause a settlement to be accounted for as an extinguishment; an entity should instead assess whether the form and amount of conversion consideration are preserved (that is, provided for in the inducement offer) using the fair value of an entity’s shares as of the offer acceptance date. The amendments in this Update also clarify that the induced conversion guidance applies to a convertible debt instrument that is not currently convertible as long as it had a substantive conversion feature as of both its issuance date and the date the inducement offer is accepted. This update will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025. Early adoption is permitted for all entities that have adopted the amendments in update 2020-06. The Fund is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the financial statements.

In September 2025, FASB issued ASU 2025-07, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”. The amendments in this Update address stakeholders’ concerns that the application of the definition of a derivative is too broad and should not apply to certain contracts. Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, establishes accounting requirements for contracts that meet the characteristics-based definition of a derivative and are not otherwise excluded from the Topic’s scope. Because of the broad application of the definition of a derivative, many types of contracts are being evaluated and potentially accounted for as derivatives. The amendments in this Update exclude from derivative accounting nonexchange-traded contracts with underlyings that are based on operations or activities specific to one of the parties to the contract. However, this scope exception does not apply to (1) variables based on a market rate, market price, or market index, (2) variables based on the price or performance of a financial asset or financial liability of one of the parties to the contract, (3) contracts (or features) involving the issuer’s own equity that are evaluated under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity, and (4) call options and put options on debt instruments. This update will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Fund is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the financial statements.

Accounting Standards Recently Adopted—On January 1, 2024, we adopted ASU 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures”. The amendments in this ASU require improved reportable segment information on an annual and interim basis, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. See Note 3 – Segments for the incremental disclosures.

On January 1, 2025, we adopted ASU 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures”. The amendments in this ASU require improved annual income tax disclosures surrounding rate reconciliation, income taxes paid, and other disclosures. This ASU effects financial statement disclosure only, which is not required until year end 2025, and as a result, does not effect our results of operations of financial condition.

Except as noted below, as compensation for services to the Fund, each Independent Director receives an annual fee of $40,000 paid quarterly in arrears, a fee of $2,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or committee thereof attended in person, a fee of $1,000 for participation in each telephonic meeting of the Board or committee thereof, and reimbursement of all out-of-pocket expenses relating to attendance at such meetings. The chair of each of our standing committees (audit, compensation, and nominating and governance) also receives an annual fee of $50,000, payable quarterly in arrears. We may also pay other one-time or recurring fees to members of our Board of Directors in special circumstances. None of our interested directors receive annual fees for their service on the Board of Directors.

In respect of services provided to the Fund by members of the Board not in connection with their roles and duties as directors, the Fund pays a rate of $300 per hour for such services.

Accounts payable to related parties were $1.0 million and $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Convertible Senior Note

On February 7, 2025, the Fund issued a one-year senior convertible promissory note bearing interest at the rate of 10.0% per annum in exchange for $2.0 million in cash (“Equus Note”). The Equus Note is convertible into shares of the Fund’s common stock at a conversion price of $1.50 per share. Pursuant to the terms of the Equus Note, the holder has the right, at its option, at any time to convert the Equus Note into a number of fully-paid and nonassessable shares of Equus common stock determined by dividing (i) the sum of the outstanding principal balance and accrued but unpaid interest of the Equus Note being converted by (ii) the conversion price.

The Fund has the right, at any time and from time to time, to prepay the Equus Note in whole or in part without premium or penalty. All interest payments may be made in cash and/or in shares of Equus common stock at the sole option of the Fund. All payments due under the Equus Note are senior to all other indebtedness of the Fund and its subsidiaries.

The Fund accounts for the Equus Note under ASC 470-20, “Debt—Debt with Conversion and other Options” (“ASC 470”). The Equus Note is assessed under ASC 815 for any conversion features which may require bifurcation.

The Fund is not required to account for the debt instrument at fair value, and did not elect to measure debt at fair value in accordance with ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging, and ASC 825,Financial Instruments.

We evaluated the conversion feature of the Equus Note offering for an embedded derivative in accordance with ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging, and the substantial premium model in accordance with ASC 470,Debt. Based on our assessment, separate accounting for the conversion feature of the Equus Note is not required.

The Fund has $1,932,000 and $0 in convertible notes payable as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.

The balances as of September 30, 2025 were as follows:

The net carrying amount of the liability and equity components of the Note was as follows:

Interest expense recognized related to the convertible note for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 was $131,000 and $0, respectively.

Stock Purchase Warrants

Contemporaneously with the issuance of the Equus Note, the Fund also issued two common stock purchase warrants (collectively, the “Warrants”) to acquire an aggregate of 1,999,999 shares of the Fund’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share of which 1,333,333 were issued to the holder of the Equus Note.

Initially, the Fund would account for warrants issued to purchase shares of its common stock as equity in accordance with FASB ASC 480,Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. However, during the quarter ended September 30, 2025 we concluded since the terms of the Warrants issued to the Equus Note holder may be modified by the holder thereof in the event of the subsequent issuance of Equus securities with terms deemed by such holders to be more favorable than the Warrants, we should account for the Warrants as a liability. Accordingly, we recorded an immaterial out-of-period adjustment to reclassify the initial value of the warrants of $437,500 from APIC to warrant liability and a write up to its absolute initial value of $560,000 and to record the subsequent change in fair value, which was unrealized appreciation of approximately $235,000 from inception to March 31, 2025 and unrealized depreciation of approximately $495,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. During the three months ended September 30, 2025 the warrants had an unrealized depreciation of approximately $898,000, for a cumulative year to date unrealized depreciation of $1,158,142 at September 30, 2025.

Subsequent to reclassification of the Warrants as described above, the Fund accounts for the Warrants as a liability under fair value Level 3 hierarchy, using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions used to measure the fair value as of September 30, 2025 under this model include the following:

The net carrying amount of the liability related to the Warrants was as follows:

(6) Portfolio Securities

In the first nine months of 2025, we completed the following investment transactions:

New Portfolio Investment. On February 10, 2025, we purchased from General Enterprise Ventures, Inc., a developer of fire suppression products (“GEVI”), a 1-year senior convertible promissory note bearing interest at the rate of 10% per annum, in exchange for $1.5 million in cash (“GEVI Note”). The GEVI Note is convertible into shares of GEVI’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.40 per share. Contemporaneously with the purchase of the GEVI Note, the Fund also received a common stock purchase warrant to acquire an aggregate of 1,875,000 shares of GEVI common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share (“GEVI Warrant”). On August 28, 2025, GEVI effected a 1-for-6 reverse split of its outstanding shares, which therefore increased the exercise price of the GEVI Warrant to $3.00 per share and reduced the number of shares subject to the GEVI Warrant to 312,500 shares. On September 22, 2025, we converted the GEVI Note, inclusive of $1.5 million in principal and $93,699 in interest, as accrued, into an aggregate of 664,041 post reverse-split shares of GEVI common stock. The shares of GEVI are publicly traded over the counter on the pink-sheets and, as of September 30, 2025, the closing trading price of GEVI shares was $5.89 per share ($0.98 on a pre-split basis) as compared to $11.70 per share ($1.95 on a pre-split basis) at June 30, 2025. Accordingly, during the three months ended September 30, 2025, we recorded a decrease of $3.4 million in the fair value of the GEVI Note and a $2.0 million decrease in the fair value of the GEVI Warrant.

Sale of Equus Energy. On March 3, 2025, we sold Equus Energy to North American Energy Opportunities Corp., a developer of upstream oil and gas assets (“NAEOC”). The consideration provided by NAEOC consisted of $1.25 million in cash and 27,500 shares of preferred stock, redeemable within 6 months of the date of issuance at $100.00 per share based upon fulfillment of certain conditions. The redemption conditions were not fulfilled by the 6-month deadline and, accordingly, at September 30, 2025, we valued the NAEOC preferred stock at $0 and realized a loss of $2.7 million.

(7) Conversion to an Operating Company

Authorization to Withdraw BDC Election—In previous years, holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock of the Fund approved our cessation as a BDC under the 1940 Act and authorized our Board to cause the Fund’s withdrawal of its election to be classified as a BDC, effective as of a date designated by the Board and our Chief Executive Officer. Although this authorization has since expired, we may receive a further authorization from our shareholders in the future as a consequence of our expressed intent to transform Equus into an operating company. Notwithstanding any such authorization to withdraw our BDC election, we will not submit any such withdrawal unless and until Equus has entered into a definitive agreement to effect a transformative transaction. Further, even if we are again authorized to withdraw our election as a BDC, we will require a subsequent affirmative vote from holders of a majority of our outstanding voting shares to enter into any such definitive agreement or change the nature of our business. While we are presently evaluating various opportunities that could enable us to accomplish this transformation, we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so within any particular time period or at all, and, although we expect that our shareholders will grant a further authorization, we do not expect to cause the Fund to withdraw its election to be classified as BDC prior to December 31, 2025. Moreover, we cannot assure you that the terms of any such transformative transaction would be acceptable to us.

**Increase in Authorized Shares—**On January 20, 2021, holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock of the Fund approved the restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of our authorized shares of common stock from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000, and the number of our authorized shares of preferred stock from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000. The increase is intended to help facilitate the transformation of Equus into an operating company and provide sufficient authorized shares to evaluate larger business concerns as possible acquisition or merger candidates.

(8) 2016 Equity Incentive Plan

**Share-Based Incentive Compensation—**On June 13, 2016, our shareholders approved the adoption of our 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (“Incentive Plan”). On January 10, 2017, the SEC issued an order approving the Incentive Plan and certain awards intended to be made thereunder. The Incentive Plan is intended to promote the interests of the Fund by encouraging officers, employees, and directors of the Fund and its affiliates to acquire or increase their equity interest in the Fund and to provide a means whereby they may develop a proprietary interest in the development and financial success of the Fund, to encourage them to remain with and devote their best efforts to the business of the Fund, thereby advancing the interests of the Fund and its stockholders. The Incentive Plan is also intended to enhance the ability of the Fund and its affiliates to attract and retain the services of individuals who are essential for the growth and profitability of the Fund. The Incentive Plan permits the award of restricted stock as well as common stock purchase options. The maximum number of shares of common stock that are subject to awards granted under the Incentive Plan is 2,434,728 shares. The term of the Incentive Plan will expire on June 13, 2026. On March 17, 2017, we granted awards of restricted stock under the Incentive Plan to certain of our directors and executive officers in the aggregate amount of 844,500 shares. These awards were each subject to a vesting requirement over a 3-year period unless the recipient thereof was terminated or removed from their position as a director or executive officer without “cause”, or as a result of constructive termination, as such terms are defined in the respective award agreements entered into by each of the recipients and the Fund. These were fully vested as of September 30, 2020. During the quarter ended September 30, 2025, we awarded an additional 380,523 shares of restricted stock under the Incentive Plan to officers of the Fund and to consultants of Morgan. These awards were fully vested at the grant date. We account for share-based compensation using the fair value method, as prescribed by ASC 718. Accordingly, for restricted stock awards, we measure the grant date fair value based upon the market price of our common stock on the date of the grant and amortize the fair value of the awards as share-based compensation expense over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting term. In the case of the most recent awards under the Incentive Plan which were fully-vested, we recognized share-based compensation expense on the date of grant, based on the number of restricted shares awarded and our closing trading price per share on such date.

(9) Morgan E&P, Inc.

Morgan E&P, Inc. (“Morgan”) was organized by the Fund on April 3, 2023 as a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Fund. On September 5, 2025, Morgan converted to a Delaware corporation. On May 22, 2023, Morgan completed the acquisition of 4,747.52 net acres, in the Bakken/Three Forks formation in the Williston Basin of North Dakota, and acquired approximately 1,100 additional acres on September 26, 2023. During the second quarter of 2024, Morgan acquired an additional 810 net acres proximate to its existing holdings. The acreage and associated mineral rights were acquired from Pro Energy I LLC (“Pro Energy”) who received a carried working interest of 20% in the acquired acreage.

Under the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement covering the initial acreage acquired by Morgan, Morgan is required to drill and complete a minimum of six wells within 18 months of receiving the first drilling permits. The average cost of drilling a new horizontal well is approximately $8.2 million. During the fourth quarter of 2023, Morgan sold certain of its wellbore interest in its initial 2 wells to a third party for $5.6 million in cash in exchange for a net revenue interest of approximately 27% in these wells.

During the fourth quarter of 2024, Morgan entered into an agreement to acquire the carried working interest held by Pro Energy in exchange for a payment of $2.4 million in cash.

During 2024, in addition to the increase in acreage noted above, Morgan also experienced an increase in proved reserves and probable reserves, largely due to the commencement of production of its initial two wells that were drilled and completed in the fourth quarter of 2023.

In May 2023, we entered into an agreement with Morgan to provide it up to $10.0 million in senior debt financing, subject to a schedule of disbursements and draws that we determine. In February 2024, we increased the total amount of the facility to $10.5 million. As of September 30, 2025, the facility had been fully-drawn.

Going-Concern—The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Morgan have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the near-term sale of quantities of oil and gas, realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and other commitments in the normal course of business. As such, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets and their carrying amount, or the amount and classification of liabilities that may result should Morgan be unable to continue as a going concern. As of September 30, 2025, Morgan does not have sufficient cash resources to fund its present operations. Morgan is presently seeking external financing to enable it to continue operations over the twelve months from the date of this quarterly report, but we cannot assure you that Morgan will be successful in doing so, or that such endeavors will generate sufficient liquidity to enable Morgan to continue operations over the next twelve months. These factors raise substantial doubt about Morgan’s ability to continue as a going concern.

We do not consolidate the financial results of Morgan with the financial results of the Fund and, accordingly, only the value of our investment in Morgan is included on our balance sheets. Our investment in Morgan is valued in accordance with our normal valuation procedures and is based in part on a reserve report prepared for Morgan by Cawley, Gillespie, & Associates, Inc., an independent petroleum engineering firm, the transactions and values of comparable companies in this sector, and the estimated value of leasehold mineral interests associated with the acreage held by Morgan. A valuation of Morgan was performed by a third-party valuation firm, who recommended a value range of Morgan consistent with the fair value determined by our Management (See Schedule of Investments).

Below is summarized unaudited condensed financial information for Morgan E&P, Inc. as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, (in thousands):

Unaudited Condensed Balance Sheet

Unaudited Condensed Statement of Operations

Unaudited Condensed Statement of Cash Flows** **

Critical Accounting Policies for Morgan

Acquisitions—Morgan evaluates each acquisition of oil and gas properties to determine whether each should be accounted for as an acquisition of assets or business in accordance with Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01: Business Combinations (Topic 805) Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”).

Asset acquisitions are recorded at the cost of acquiring the property. The results of operations of the oil and gas properties acquired in the Company’s acquisitions have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the closing dates of the respective acquisitions. A business combination may result in the recognition of a bargain purchase gain or goodwill based on the measurement of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired at the acquisition date as compared to the fair value of consideration transferred, adjusted for purchase price adjustments. The initial accounting for business combinations may not be complete and adjustments to provisional amounts, or recognition of additional assets acquired, or liabilities assumed, may occur as more detailed analyses are completed and additional information is obtained about the facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition dates.

Oil & Gas Properties—The method of accounting for oil and natural gas properties determines what costs are capitalized and how these costs are ultimately matched with revenue and expenses. Morgan uses the full cost method of accounting for oil and natural gas properties. Under the full cost method, all direct costs and certain indirect costs associated with the acquisition, exploration, and development of oil and natural gas properties are capitalized.

Oil and gas properties include costs that are excluded from costs being depleted or amortized. Oil and natural gas property costs excluded represent investments in unproved properties and include non-producing leasehold, geological and geophysical costs associated with leasehold or drilling interests and exploration costs. The Company excludes these costs until the project is evaluated and proved reserves are established or impairment is determined. Excluded costs are reviewed at least annually to determine if impairment has occurred. The amount of any evaluated or impaired oil and natural gas properties is transferred to capitalized costs being amortized. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company transferred $0.03 million and $1.5 million, respectively, to the full cost pool.

Oil and natural gas properties are depleted using the units-of-production method. The depletion expense is significantly affected by the unamortized historical and future development costs and the estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves. Estimation of proved oil and natural gas reserves relies on professional judgment and the use of factors that cannot be precisely determined. Holding all other factors constant, if proved oil and natural gas reserves were revised upward or downward, earnings would increase or decrease, respectively. Subsequent proved reserve estimates that are materially different from those reported would change the depletion expense recognized during the future reporting period. Proceeds from the sales or disposition of oil and natural gas of proved and unproved properties are accounted for as a reduction of capitalized costs with no gain or loss recognized, unless such reduction would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves, in which case the gain or loss is recognized in the statement of income. In general, a significant alteration occurs when the deferral of gains or losses will result in an amortization rate materially different from the amortization rate calculated upon recognition of gains or losses. Abandonments of properties are accounted for as adjustments of capitalized costs with no loss recognized.

Under the full cost accounting rules, total capitalized costs are limited to a ceiling equal to the present value of future net revenue, discounted at 10% per annum, plus the lower of cost or fair value of unevaluated properties less income tax effects (the “ceiling limitation”). Future net revenue used to calculate the ceiling do not include cash outflows associated with settling asset retirement obligations. Morgan performs an annual ceiling test to evaluate whether the net book value of the full cost pool exceeds the ceiling limitation. If capitalized costs (net of accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization) are greater than the discounted future net revenue or ceiling limitation, a write-down or impairment of the full cost pool is required. A write-down of the carrying value of the full cost pool is a non-cash charge that reduces earnings and impacts members’ equity in the period of occurrence and typically results in lower depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense in future periods. Once incurred, a write-down is not reversible at a later date. The risk that Morgan will be required to write-down the carrying value of oil and natural gas properties increases during a period when oil or gas prices are depressed. In addition, a write-down may occur if estimates of proved reserves are substantially reduced or estimates of future development costs increase significantly.

Income Taxes— Morgan was a single-member limited liability company that had elected to be taxed as a C Corporation under Subchapter C of the Internal Revenue Code from inception. Although Morgan later converted to a corporation, its federal tax treatment remained unchanged because of the original election. For state tax purposes, Morgan will file a combined Texas margin tax filing with its direct parent, Equus Total Return, Inc., and its related affiliates.

Morgan records income taxes for interim reporting periods based on an estimated annual effective tax rate. This estimated rate is reassessed each quarter and may fluctuate due to changes in forecasted annual operating income, adjustments to the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, and changes in actual or projected permanent book-to-tax differences. Morgan’s effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was 0.0%, and accordingly, no income tax expense or benefit was recorded for the quarter.

Morgan records deferred tax assets to the extent Morgan believes these assets will more-likely-than-not be realized. In making such determinations, Morgan considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In the event Morgan were to determine that it would be able to realize deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be made which would reduce the provision for income taxes. . For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company believes its deferred tax assets will more-likely-than-not be realized and has recorded a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets.

On July 4, 2025, Public Law No. 119-21, the Act was signed into law by the U.S. government. Key provisions of the Act effecting Morgan include: (i) the permanent reduction of the corporate tax rate, (ii) the permanent extension of 100% bonus depreciation for qualified property, and (iii) modifications to the calculation for excess business interest expense limitation under § 163(j) to adjusted taxable income calculation on the business interest expense limitation.

In accordance with ASC 740, Morgan has recognized the effects of the new tax law in the period of enactment. The adoption of the Act did not result in any material impact to current or deferred income tax expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. Morgan continues to evaluate the impact of the Act on its financial statements and will update its estimates as additional guidance becomes available.

ASC Topic 740-10,*Income Taxes,*provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized in the financial statements when it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on technical merits. This guidance also addresses measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods, disclosure and transition. Morgan has no material uncertain tax positions in its prior or current filings

Asset Retirement Obligations—The fair value of asset retirement obligations are recorded in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and the corresponding cost is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The fair value of the asset retirement obligation is measured using expected future cash outflows discounted at Morgan’s credit- adjusted risk-free interest rate. Fair value, to the extent possible, should include a market risk premium for unforeseeable circumstances. No market risk premium was included in Morgan’s asset retirement obligation fair value estimate since a reasonable estimate could not be made. The liability is accreted to its then present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depleted or amortized over the estimated recoverable reserves using the units-of-production method. If the obligation is settled for other than the carrying amount of the liability, the Company will record the difference to the full cost pool.

Environmental Matters

We do not believe the existence of current environmental laws or interpretations thereof will materially hinder or adversely affect Morgan’s business operations; however, there can be no assurances of future effects on Morgan of new laws or interpretations thereof.

Environmental Contingencies

Morgan’s activities are subject to local, state, and federal laws and regulations governing environmental quality and pollution control in the United States. The exploration, drilling and production from wells, natural gas facilities, including the operation and construction of pipelines, plants and other facilities for transporting, processing, treating, or storing natural gas and other products, are subject to stringent environmental regulation by state and federal authorities, including the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). Such regulation can increase the cost of planning, designing, installing, and operating such facilities.

Financing

On August 14, 2025, Morgan secured a $3 million loan facility, the proceeds of which were used to fund near-term drilling and work-over operations in the Bakken Shale formation of North Dakota’s Williston Basin on two existing but non-producing wells owned by Morgan.

Management performed an evaluation of the Fund’s activity through the date the financial statements were issued, noting no subsequent event.