MGIC INVESTMENT CORP
For the period ended Dec 31, 2023. Filed Feb 21, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2023 · Filed Feb 21, 2024
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following section of the MD&A provides a comparative discussion of our Consolidated Results of Operations for the two-year period ended December 31, 2023. For a discussion of the Critical Accounting Estimates used by us that affect the Consolidated Results of Operations, see"Critical Accounting Estimates" below.
REVENUES
| Revenues | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
| (In millions) · 2023 · 2022 · % Change | ||||||
| Net premiums written | $915.0 | $960.7 | (5) | |||
| Net premiums earned | $952.6 | $1,007.1 | (5) | |||
| Investment income, net of expenses | 214.7 | 167.5 | 28 | |||
| Net gains (losses) on investments and other financial instruments | (14.1) | (7.5) | 88 | |||
| Other revenue | 2.0 | 5.6 | (64) | |||
| Total revenues (1) | $1,155.1 | $1,172.8 | (2) | |||
| (1) May not foot due to rounding | ||||||
NET PREMIUMS WRITTEN AND EARNED
Net premiums written and earned decreased 5% in 2023 compared with the prior year. The decrease in premiums written and earned in 2023 compared to the prior year is primarily dueto an increase in ceded premiums that was the result of a decrease in the profit commission earned on our QSR Transactions.
Premium yields
Premium yield is net premiums earned divided by average IIF during the year and is influenced by a number of key drivers, which have a varying impact from period to period. The following table provides information related to our premium yield for 2023, and 2022.
| Premium Yield | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
| (in basis points) · 2023 · 2022 | |||||
| In force portfolio yield | (1) | 38.5 | 39.4 | ||
| Premium refunds | (0.1) | 0.1 | |||
| Accelerated earnings on single premium policies | 0.4 | 1.0 | |||
| Total direct premium yield | 38.8 | 40.5 | |||
| Ceded premiums earned, net of profit commission and assumed premiums | (2) | (6.5) | (5.2) | ||
| Net premium yield | 32.3 | 35.3 | |||
(1) Total direct premiums earned, excluding premium refunds and accelerated premiums from single premium policy cancellations divided by average primary insurance in force.
(2) Ceded premiums for reinsurance cancellation activities decreased the premium yield by 0.5 bps in 2023 and 0.1 bps in 2022. Assumed premiums include those from our participation in GSE CRT programs, of which the impact on the net premium yield was 0.4 bps in 2023 and 0.3 bps in 2022.
Changes in the net premium yields when compared to the respective prior year periods reflect the following:
| In force Portfolio Yield | |
|---|---|
| è | A larger percentage of our IIF from book years with lower premium rates due to a decline in premium rates in recent years resulting from pricing competition, an in force book with lower risk characteristics, lower required capital, the availability of reinsurance, and certain policies undergoing premium rate resets on their ten-year anniversaries. |
| Premium Refunds | |
|---|---|
| è | Premium refunds are primarily driven by claim activity and our estimate of refundable premiums on our delinquency inventory. The low level of claims received have resulted in a lower level of premium refunds. Our estimate of refundable premium on our delinquency inventory fluctuates with changes in our delinquency inventory and our estimate of the number of loans in our delinquency inventory that will result in a claim. |
| Accelerated earnings on single premium policies | |
|---|---|
| è | The lower level of refinance transactions have reduced the benefit from accelerated earned premium from cancellation of single premium policies prior to their estimated policy life. |
| Ceded premiums earned, net of profit commission and assumed premiums | |
|---|---|
| è | Ceded premiums earned, net of profit commission adversely impact our net premium yield. Ceded premiums earned, net of profit commission, are associated with the QSR Transactions and the XOL Transactions. Assumed premiums consists primarily of premiums from GSE CRT programs. See “Reinsurance Transactions“ below for further discussion on our reinsurance transactions. |
As discussed in our Risk Factor titled "Competition or changes in our relationships with our customers could reduce our revenues, reduce our premium yields and/or increase our losses," the private mortgage insurance industry is highly competitive and premium rates have declined over the past several years. With the smaller origination market, higher persistency rate, and continued high credit quality for NIW expected in 2024, we expect our in force portfolio premium yield to remain relatively flat during 2024.
See "Overview – Factors Affecting Our Results" above for additional factors that also influence the amount of net premiums written and earned in a year.
REINSURANCE TRANSACTIONS
Quota Share Reinsurance
Our quota share reinsurance affects various lines of our statements of operations and therefore we believe it should be analyzed by reviewing its total effect on our pre-tax income, as described below.
| è | We cede a fixed percentage of premiums earned and received on insurance covered by the transactions. |
|---|---|
| è | We receive the benefit of a profit commission through a reduction in the premiums we cede. The profit commission varies inversely with the level of losses incurred on a "dollar for dollar" basis and can be eliminated at loss levels higher than what we have experienced. As a result, lower levels of ceded losses incurred result in less benefit from ceded losses incurred, and a higher profit commission; higher levels of ceded losses incurred result in more benefit from ceded losses incurred and a lower profit commission (or for certain levels of accident year loss ratios, its elimination). |
| è | We receive the benefit of a ceding commission through a reduction in underwriting expenses equal to 20% of premiums ceded (before the effect of the profit commission). |
| è | We cede a fixed percentage of losses incurred on insurance covered by the transactions. |
The following table provides information related to our QSR Transactions for 2023 and 2022.
| Quota share reinsurance | ||
|---|---|---|
| As of and For the Years Ended December 31, | ||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 |
| Statements of operations: | ||
| Ceded premiums written and earned, net of profit commission | $123,955 | $86,435 |
| % of direct premiums written | 11% | 8% |
| % of direct premiums earned | 11% | 7% |
| Profit commission | 133,145 | 176,084 |
| Ceding commissions | 50,397 | 52,071 |
| Ceded losses incurred | 15,623 | (19,837) |
| Mortgage insurance portfolio: | ||
| Ceded RIF (in millions) | ||
| 2020 QSR | — | 3,902 |
| 2021 QSR | 6,060 | 6,809 |
| 2022 QSR | 4,693 | 5,027 |
| 2023 QSR | 2,391 | — |
| Credit Union QSR | 2,608 | 2,261 |
| Total ceded RIF | $15,752 | $17,999 |
Ceded premiums written, and earned net of profit commission increased in 2023 when compared with the prior year primarily due to a decrease in the profit commission, which increases ceded premiums written and earned. The decrease in profit commission was driven by the increase in losses incurred. Ceded losses incurred are impacted by the delinquencies covered by our QSR Transactions, our estimates of payments that will be ultimately made on those delinquencies, and claim payments covered by our QSR Transactions.
We terminated our 2020 QSR Transactions effective December 31, 2023 and incurred an early termination fee of $5 million. We terminated our 2015 and 2019 QSR Transactions effective December 31, 2022 and incurred an early termination fee of $2 million on our 2019 QSR Transaction.
Covered Risk
The percentages of our NIW, new risk written, IIF, and RIF subject to our QSR Transactions as shown in the following table will vary from period to period in part due to the mix of our risk written during the period and the number of active QSR Transactions.
| Quota share reinsurance | ||
|---|---|---|
| As of and For the Years Ended December 31, | ||
| 2023 | 2022 | |
| NIW subject to QSR Transactions | 86.8% | 87.4% |
| New Risk Written subject to QSR Transactions | 92.8% | 93.0% |
| IIF subject to QSR Transactions | 60.4% | 67.9% |
| RIF subject to QSR Transactions | 64.2% | 73.0% |
The decrease in IIF and RIF subject to QSR Transactions was primarily due to the termination of our 2020 QSR Transaction at December 31, 2023.
2024 QSR Transaction
We executed a 30% QSR Transaction with a group of unaffiliated reinsurers covering most of our new insurance written in 2024.
Excess of Loss Reinsurance
We have excess of loss reinsurance (“XOL Transactions”) with panels of unaffiliated reinsurers executed through the traditional reinsurance market (“Traditional XOL Transaction”) and with unaffiliated special purpose insurers (“Home Re Transactions”).
For policies covered by our Traditional XOL Transactions, we retain the first layer of the aggregate losses paid, and the reinsurers will then provide second layer coverage up to the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount. We retain losses paid in excess of the outstanding reinsurance coverage amount. The reinsurance coverage is subject to adjustment based on the risk characteristics of the covered loans until the initial excess of loss reinsurance coverage layer has been finalized. The 2022 Traditional XOL Transaction provides $142.6 million of reinsurance coverage on eligible NIW in 2022. The 2023 Traditional XOL Transaction provides $96.9 million of reinsurance coverage on eligible NIW in 2023.
The Home Re Transactions are executed through the issuance of insurance linked notes (“ILNs”). At December 31, 2023 our Home Re Transactions provided $1.2 billion of loss coverage on a portfolio of policies having an in force date from July 1, 2016 through March 31, 2019, from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021,and from June 1, 2022 through August 31, 2023; all dates inclusive. For this reinsurance coverage, we retain the first layer of the respective aggregate losses paid, and a Home Re Entity will then provide second layer coverage up to the outstanding reinsurance amount.
The current attachment, current detachment, and PMIERs required asset credit for each of our XOL Transactions as of December 31, 2023, are as follows:
| ($ In thousands) | Initial Attachment % (1) | Initial Detachment % (2) | Current Attachment % (1) | Current Detachment % (2) | PMIERs Required Asset Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home Re 2018-1 | 2.25% | 6.50% | 15.18% | 21.62% | $— |
| Home Re 2019-1 | 2.50% | 6.75% | 17.82% | 38.12% | — |
| Home Re 2020-1 | 3.00% | 7.50% | 7.71% | 8.75% | — |
| Home Re 2021-1 | 2.25% | 6.50% | 4.08% | 7.58% | 91,947 |
| Home Re 2021-2 | 2.10% | 6.50% | 3.12% | 7.30% | 157,706 |
| Home Re 2022-1 | 2.75% | 6.75% | 3.29% | 7.55% | 340,870 |
| Home Re 2023-1 | 3.00% | 6.75% | 3.08% | 6.92% | 330,277 |
| 2022 Traditional XOL | 2.60% | 7.10% | 2.79% | 7.61% | 137,507 |
| 2023 Traditional XOL | 2.91% | 6.91% | 2.91% | 6.91% | 93,278 |
(1) The percentage represents the cumulative losses as a percentage of adjusted risk in force that MGIC retains prior to the XOL taking losses.
(2) The percentage represents the cumulative losses as a percentage of adjusted risk in force that must be reached before MGIC begins absorbing losses after the XOL layer
In October, 2023 Home Re 2019-1 Ltd., Home Re 2021-1 Ltd., and Home Re 2021-2 Ltd completed tender offers for certain tranches of the mortgage insurance-linked notes that supported the reinsurance agreements with MGIC. The tender offer resulted in the reduction in the insurance-linked notes of $187.1 million for the Home Re 2019-1 Ltd, $91.1 million for the Home Re 2021-1 Ltd., and $106.7 million for the Home Re 2021-2 Ltd. The reinsurance coverage corresponding to the tendered notes was terminated. MGIC incurred approximately $8.0 million of additional ceded premium in the fourth quarter associated with the tender premiums and associated expenses.
We ceded premiums on our XOL Transactions of $78.9 million and $69.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
See Note 9 - "Reinsurance," to our consolidated financial statements for additional discussion of our XOL Transactions.
INVESTMENT INCOME, NET
Net investment income increased 28% to $214.7 million in 2023 compared to $167.5 million in 2022. The increase in net investment income was primarily due to an increase of approximately 80 basis points in average investment yields.
See"Balance Sheet Review" in this MD&A for further discussion regarding our investment portfolio.
LOSSES AND EXPENSES
| Year Ended December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (In millions) | 2023 | 2022 | % Change |
| Losses incurred, net | $(20.9) | $(254.6) | (92) |
| Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs | 10.8 | 12.4 | (13) |
| Other underwriting and operating expenses, net | 226.0 | 236.7 | (5) |
| Loss on debt extinguishment | — | 40.2 | (100) |
| Interest expense | 36.9 | 48.1 | (23) |
| Total losses and expenses (1) | $252.9 | $82.8 | 206 |
| (1) May not foot due to rounding | |||
LOSSES INCURRED, NET
As discussed in “Critical Accounting Estimates” below and consistent with industry practices, we establish case loss reserves for future claims on delinquent loans that were reported to us as two payments past due and have not become current or resulted in a claim payment. Such loans are referred to as being in our delinquency inventory. Case loss reserves are established based on estimating the number of loans in our delinquency inventory that will result in a claim payment, which is referred to as the claim rate, and further estimating the amount of the claim payment, which is referred to as claim severity.
IBNR reserves are established for estimated losses from delinquencies we estimate have occurred prior to the close of an accounting period, but have not yet been reported to us. IBNR reserves are also established using estimated claim rates and claim severities.
Estimation of losses is inherently judgmental. Even in a stable environment, changes to our estimates could result in a material impact to our consolidated results of operations and financial position. The conditions that affect the claim rate and claim severity include the current and future state of the domestic economy, including unemployment, and the current and future strength of local housing markets; exposure on insured loans; the amount of time between delinquency and claim filing (all else being equal, the longer the period between delinquency and claim filing, the greater the severity); and curtailments and rescissions. The actual amount of the claim payments may be substantially different than our loss reserve estimates. Our estimates could be adversely affected by several factors, including a deterioration of regional or national economic conditions, including unemployment, leading to a reduction in borrowers’ income and thus their ability to make mortgage payments, the impact of past and future government initiatives and actions taken by the GSEs (including mortgage forbearance programs and foreclosure moratoriums), and a drop in housing values which may affect borrower willingness to continue to make mortgage payments when the value of the home is below the mortgage balance. Loss reserves in future periods will also be dependent on the number of loans reported to us as delinquent.
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, losses followed a seasonal trend in which the second half of the year has weaker credit performance than the first half, with higher new notice activity and a lower cure rate. The state of the economy, local housing markets and various other factors, may result in delinquencies not following the typical pattern.
For information on how pandemics and other disasters could affect losses incurred, net see our Risk Factors titled “Pandemics, hurricanes and other disasters may impact our incurred losses, the amount and timing of paid claims, our inventory of notices of default and our Minimum Required Assets under PMIERs". As discussed in our Risk Factor titled “Because we establish loss reserves only upon a loan delinquency rather than based on estimates of our ultimate losses on risk in force, losses may have a disproportionate adverse effect on our earnings in certain periods” if we have not received a notice of delinquency with respect to a loan and if we have not estimated the loan to be delinquent as of December 31, 2023, through our IBNR reserve, then we have not yet recorded an incurred loss with respect to that loan.
Losses incurred, net increased to $(20.9) million compared to $(254.6) million in 2022. While new delinquency notices added $187.7 million to losses incurred in 2023, our re-estimation of loss reserves on previously received delinquency notices resulted in favorable development of approximately $208.5 million. In 2022, new delinquency notices added $149.6 million to losses incurred, offset by our re-estimation of loss reserves on previously received delinquency notices resulted in $404.1 million of favorable loss development. The favorable development for both periods primarily resulted from a decrease in the expected claim rate on previously received delinquencies. Home price appreciation experienced in recent years has allowed some borrowers to cure their delinquencies through the sale of their property.
See "New notice claim rate" and "Claims severity" below for additional factors and trends that impact these loss reserve assumptions.
| Composition of losses incurred | ||
|---|---|---|
| Year Ended December 31, | ||
| (In millions) | 2023 | 2022 |
| Current year / New notices | $187.7 | $149.6 |
| Prior year reserve development | (208.5) | (404.1) |
| Losses incurred, net (1) | $(20.9) | $(254.6) |
| (1) May not foot due to rounding | ||
Loss ratio
The loss ratio is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the sum of losses incurred, net to net premiums earned. The increase in the loss ratio in 2023 when compared to 2022 was primarily due to a increase in losses incurred as discussed above.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |
| Loss ratio | (2.2)% | (25.3)% |
New notice claim rate
The table below presents our new delinquency notices received, delinquency inventory, and the average number of missed payments for the loans in our delinquency inventory by policy year:
| New notices and delinquency inventory during the period | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy Year · New Delinquency Notices Received in the Year Ended · Delinquency Inventory · Avg. Number of Missed Payments of Delinquency Inventory | ||||
| 2004 and prior | 3,392 | 2,072 | 18 | |
| 2005-2008 | 10,807 | 7,008 | 17 | |
| 2009-2015 | 2,607 | 1,414 | 11 | |
| 2016 | 1,824 | 954 | 9 | |
| 2017 | 2,518 | 1,365 | 9 | |
| 2018 | 3,118 | 1,750 | 8 | |
| 2019 | 3,080 | 1,550 | 7 | |
| 2020 | 5,028 | 2,383 | 6 | |
| 2021 | 8,754 | 4,237 | 5 | |
| 2022 | 5,150 | 2,605 | 5 | |
| 2023 | 547 | 312 | 3 | |
| Total | 46,825 | 25,650 | 11 | |
| Claim rate on new notices (1) | 7.5% | |||
| Policy Year | New Delinquency Notices Received in the Year Ended | Delinquency Inventory | Avg. Number of Missed Payments of Delinquency Inventory | |
| 2004 and prior | 3,695 | 2,471 | 18 | |
| 2005-2008 | 11,702 | 8,317 | 19 | |
| 2009-2015 | 3,115 | 2,017 | 12 | |
| 2016 | 2,090 | 1,249 | 10 | |
| 2017 | 2,797 | 1,719 | 10 | |
| 2018 | 3,289 | 2,060 | 9 | |
| 2019 | 3,199 | 1,823 | 9 | |
| 2020 | 5,067 | 2,558 | 7 | |
| 2021 | 6,656 | 3,307 | 5 | |
| 2022 | 1,378 | 866 | 3 | |
| Total | 42,988 | 26,387 | 12 | |
| Claim rate on new notices (1) | 7.5% | |||
| (1) Claim rate is the respective full year weighted average rate. | ||||
Claims severity
Factors that impact claim severity include:
| è | economic conditions at that time, including home prices compared to home prices at the time of placement of coverage |
|---|---|
| è | exposure on the loan, which is the unpaid principal balance of the loan times our insurance coverage percentage, |
| è | length of time between delinquency and claim filing (which impacts the amount of interest and expenses, with a longer period between default and claim filing generally increasing severity), and |
| è | curtailments. |
As discussed in Note 8 - "Loss Reserves," our loss reserves estimates take into consideration trends over time, because the development of the delinquencies may vary from period to period without establishing a meaningful trend. An increase in third party property sales, prior to claim settlement has resulted in a decrease in the average claim paid and the average claim paid as a percentage of exposure in recent years. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the level of claims received decreased. Claim activity and the average claims paid as a percentage of exposure has not yet returned to pre-COVID-19 levels. The magnitude and timing of the increases are uncertain.
The majority of loans insured prior to 2014 (which represent 37% of the loans in the delinquency inventory) are covered by master policy terms that, except under certain circumstances, do not limit the number of years that an insured can include interest when filing a claim.
Under our current master policy terms, an insured can include accumulated interest when filing a claim only for the first three years the loan is delinquent. In each case, the insured must comply with its obligations under the terms of the applicable master policy.
| Claims severity trend | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period | Average exposure on claim paid | Average claim paid | % Paid to exposure | Average number of missed payments at claim received date |
| Q4 2023 | $49,720 | $31,141 | 62.6% | 40 |
| Q3 2023 | 43,271 | 28,538 | 66.0% | 41 |
| Q2 2023 | 40,013 | 29,803 | 74.5% | 43 |
| Q1 2023 | 37,412 | 28,227 | 75.4% | 42 |
| Q4 2022 | 38,903 | 28,492 | 73.2% | 41 |
| Q3 2022 | 37,625 | 23,461 | 62.4% | 46 |
| Q2 2022 | 44,106 | 27,374 | 62.1% | 41 |
| Q1 2022 | 38,009 | 27,662 | 72.8% | 45 |
| Note: Table excludes material settlements. Settlements include amounts paid in settlement of disputes for claims paying practices and/or commutations of policies. | ||||
See Note 8 – “Loss Reserves” to our consolidated financial statements and “Critical Accounting Estimates” below for a discussion of our losses incurred and claims paying practices (including curtailments).
The length of time a loan is in the delinquency inventory can differ from the number of payments that the borrower has not made or is considered delinquent. These differences typically result from a borrower making monthly payments that do not result in the loan becoming fully current. Generally, a defaulted loan with more missed payments is more likely to result in a claim. The number of payments that a borrower is delinquent is shown in the following table.
| Primary delinquent inventory - number of payments delinquent | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |
| 3 payments or less | 12,665 | 11,484 |
| 4 - 11 payments | 8,064 | 8,026 |
| 12 payments or more (1) | 4,921 | 6,877 |
| Total | 25,650 | 26,387 |
| 3 payments or less | 50% | 44% |
| 4 - 11 payments | 31% | 30% |
| 12 payments or more | 19% | 26% |
| Total | 100% | 100% |
(1)Approximately 34% and 28% of the loans in the primary delinquency inventory with 12 payments or more delinquent have at least 36 payments delinquent as of December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
NET LOSSES AND LAE PAID
Net losses and LAE paid in 2023 were consistent with 2022. Our claims paid activity slowed at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic primarily due to forbearance and foreclosure moratoriums put in place, and it has not yet appreciably increased from those suppressed levels. Home price appreciation experienced in recent years has allowed some borrowers to cure their delinquencies through the sale of their property. In addition, an increase in third party property sales prior to claim settlement has resulted in a decrease in the average claim paid on the claims we do receive. We expect net losses and LAE paid to increase, however, the magnitude and timing of the increases are uncertain.
The table below presents our net losses and LAE paid for 2023 and 2022.
| Net losses and LAE paid | ||
|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2023 | 2022 |
| Total primary (excluding settlements) | $39 | $35 |
| NPL settlements | 1 | 8 |
| Pool | — | — |
| Direct losses paid | 40 | 43 |
| Reinsurance | (1) | (1) |
| Net losses paid | 39 | 42 |
| LAE | 7 | 8 |
| Net losses and LAE paid before terminations | 46 | 50 |
| Reinsurance terminations (1) | (9) | (18) |
| Net losses and LAE paid | $37 | $32 |
| Average claim paid (2) | $29,405 | $26,715 |
(1)See Note 9 - "Reinsurance" for additional information on our reinsurance terminations
(2)Excludes amounts paid in NPL settlements
The primary average claim paid can vary materially from period to period based upon a variety of factors, including the local market conditions, average loan amount, average coverage percentage, the amount of time between delinquency and claim filing, and our loss mitigation efforts on loans for which claims are paid.
The primary average RIF on delinquent loans as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 and for the top 5 jurisdictions (based on December 31, 2023 delinquency inventory) appears in the following table.
| Primary average RIF - delinquent loans | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |
| Florida | $63,885 | $59,903 |
| Texas | 59,841 | 53,743 |
| Illinois | 44,562 | 42,431 |
| Pennsylvania | 44,263 | 42,178 |
| California | 102,145 | 95,153 |
| All other jurisdictions | 54,723 | 51,375 |
| Total all jurisdictions | $57,143 | $53,458 |
The primary average RIF on all loans was $67,705 and $64,784 at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. The increase is primarily due to an increase in loans from recent years which generally have larger loan balances.
The gross reserves as of December 31, 2023, and 2022 appear in the table below.
| Gross loss reserves | ||
|---|---|---|
| December 31, | ||
| 2023 | 2022 | |
| Primary: | ||
| Case reserves (In millions) | $448 | $498 |
| IBNR and LAE | 54 | 56 |
| Total primary direct loss reserves | 502 | 554 |
| Ending delinquency inventory | 25,650 | 26,387 |
| Percentage of loans delinquent (default rate) | 2.25% | 2.22% |
| Average direct reserve per default | $19,562 | $20,994 |
| Primary claims received inventory included in ending delinquency inventory | 302 | 267 |
| Other gross loss reserves (1) (In millions) | 3 | 4 |
(1)Other gross loss reserves includes direct and assumed reserves that are not included within our primary loss reserves.
The primary delinquency inventory for the top 15 jurisdictions (based on December 31, 2023 delinquency inventory) at December 31, 2023, and 2022 appears in table the below.
| Primary delinquency inventory by jurisdiction | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |
| Florida * | 2,100 | 2,414 |
| Texas | 2,094 | 1,935 |
| Illinois * | 1,684 | 1,640 |
| Pennsylvania * | 1,433 | 1,525 |
| California | 1,354 | 1,336 |
| New York * | 1,342 | 1,399 |
| Ohio * | 1,246 | 1,322 |
| Michigan | 1,115 | 965 |
| Georgia | 955 | 954 |
| New Jersey * | 774 | 841 |
| North Carolina | 705 | 753 |
| Maryland | 680 | 719 |
| Indiana * | 645 | 622 |
| Minnesota | 566 | 573 |
| Virginia | 538 | 582 |
| All other jurisdictions | 8,419 | 8,807 |
| Total | 25,650 | 26,387 |
| Note: Asterisk denotes jurisdictions in the table above that predominately use a judicial foreclosure process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed. | ||
The primary delinquency inventory by policy year at December 31, 2023 and 2022 appears in the following table.
| Primary delinquency inventory by policy year | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 · 2022 | ||
| 2004 and prior | 2,072 | 2,471 |
| 2004 and prior %: | 8% | 9% |
| 2005 | 1,289 | 1,438 |
| 2006 | 2,015 | 2,388 |
| 2007 | 3,029 | 3,680 |
| 2008 | 675 | 811 |
| 2005 - 2008 % | 27% | 32% |
| 2009 | 37 | 51 |
| 2010 | 25 | 31 |
| 2011 | 25 | 43 |
| 2012 | 43 | 72 |
| 2013 | 158 | 243 |
| 2014 | 434 | 633 |
| 2015 | 692 | 944 |
| 2009 - 2015 % | 6% | 8% |
| 2016 | 954 | 1,249 |
| 2017 | 1,365 | 1,719 |
| 2018 | 1,750 | 2,060 |
| 2019 | 1,550 | 1,823 |
| 2020 | 2,383 | 2,558 |
| 2021 | 4,237 | 3,307 |
| 2022 | 2,605 | 866 |
| 2023 | 312 | — |
| 2016 and later %: | 59% | 51% |
| Total | 25,650 | 26,387 |
On our primary business, the highest claim frequency years have typically been the third and fourth year after loan origination. However, the pattern of claim frequency can be affected by many factors, including persistency and deteriorating economic conditions. Deteriorating economic conditions can result in increasing claims following a period of declining claims. As of December 31, 2023, 67% of our primary RIF was written subsequent to December 31, 2020, 84% of our primary RIF was written subsequent to December 31, 2019, and 89% of our primary RIF was written subsequent to December 31, 2018.
UNDERWRITING AND OTHER EXPENSES, NET
Underwriting and other expenses includes items such as employee compensation costs, fees for professional and consulting services, depreciation and maintenance expense, and premium taxes, and are reported net of ceding commissions.
Underwriting and other expenses, net for 2023 decreased to $226.0 million from $236.7 million in 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in expenses related to professional and consulting services and a decrease in expenses related to settlement accounting charges.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |
| Underwriting expense ratio | 25.5% | 25.2% |
The underwriting expense ratio is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of the underwriting and operating expenses, net and amortization of DAC of our combined insurance operations (which excludes underwriting and operating expenses of our non-insurance subsidiaries) to net premiums written. The underwriting expense ratio increased in 2023 compared with 2022 due to a decrease in net premiums written, partially offset by a decrease in underwriting and operating expenses, net.
LOSS ON DEBT EXTINGUISHMENT
In 2023, we did not record a loss on debt extinguishment. In 2022, we recorded a loss on debt extinguishment of $40.2 million, related to the repurchases of a portion our 9% Debentures, the redemption of our 5.75% Senior Notes, and the repayment of the outstanding principal balance of the FHLB Advance.
See Note 7 - "Debt" to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the 9% Debenture conversion in 2023.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense for 2023 was $36.9 million compared to $48.1 million for 2022. The decrease is due to the debt transactions discussed above.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE AND EFFECTIVE TAX RATE
| Income tax provision and effective tax rate | ||
|---|---|---|
| (In thousands, except rate) | 2023 | 2022 |
| Income before tax | $902,229 | $1,090,034 |
| Provision for income taxes | $189,280 | $224,685 |
| Effective tax rate | 21.0% | 20.6% |
The decrease in our provision for income taxes for 2023 compared to 2022 was primarily due to a decrease in income before tax. Our effective tax rate for 2023 and 2022 approximated the federal statutory income tax rate of 21%.
See Note 12 – “Income Taxes” to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our tax position.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.