HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC
For the period ended Sep 30, 2024. Filed Oct 24, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Sep 30, 2024 · Filed Oct 24, 2024
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Enterprise Risk Management
|
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
|---|
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
The Company’s Board of Directors has ultimate responsibility for risk oversight, as described more fully in our Proxy Statement, while management is tasked with the day-to-day management of the Company’s risks.
The Company manages and monitors risk through risk policies, controls and limits. At the senior management level, an Enterprise Risk and Capital Committee (“ERCC”) oversees the risk profile and risk management practices of the Company.
The Company's enterprise risk management ("ERM") function supports the ERCC and functional committees, and is tasked with, among other things:
risk identification and assessment;
the development of risk appetites, tolerances, and limits;
risk monitoring; and
internal and external risk reporting.
The Company categorizes its main risks as insurance risk, operational risk and financial risk. Insurance risk and financial risk are described in more detail below. Operational risk, including cybersecurity, and specific risk tolerances for natural catastrophes, terrorism and pandemic risk are described in the ERM section of the MD&A in The Hartford’s 2023 Form 10-K Annual Report.
|INSURANCE RISK
Insurance risk is the risk of losses of both a catastrophic and non-catastrophic nature on the P&C and Group Benefits products the Company has sold. Catastrophe insurance risk is the exposure arising from both natural catastrophes (e.g., weather, earthquakes, wildfires, pandemics) and man-made catastrophes (e.g., terrorism, cyber-attacks) that create a concentration or aggregation of loss across the Company's insurance or asset portfolios.
Sources of Insurance Risk Non-catastrophe insurance risks exist within each of the Company's segments except Hartford Funds and include:
Property- Risk of loss to personal or commercial property from automobile related accidents, weather, explosions, smoke, shaking, fire, theft, vandalism, inadequate installation, faulty equipment, collisions and falling objects, and/or machinery mechanical breakdown resulting in physical damage, losses from PV&T and other covered perils.
Liability- Risk of loss from automobile related accidents, uninsured and underinsured drivers, lawsuits from accidents, defective products, breach of warranty, negligent acts by professional practitioners, environmental claims, latent exposures, fraud, coercion, forgery, failure to fulfill obligations per contract surety, liability from errors and omissions, losses from CPRI coverages, losses from
derivative lawsuits, and other securities actions and covered perils.
Mortality- Risk of loss from unexpected trends in insured deaths impacting timing of payouts from group life insurance, personal or commercial automobile related accidents, and death of employees or executives during the course of employment, while on disability, or while collecting workers compensation benefits.
Morbidity- Risk of loss to an insured from illness incurred during the course of employment or illness from other covered perils.
Disability- Risk of loss incurred from personal or commercial automobile related losses, accidents arising outside of the workplace, injuries or accidents incurred during the course of employment, or from equipment, with each loss resulting in short-term or long-term disability payments.
Longevity- Risk of loss from increased life expectancy trends among policyholders receiving long-term benefit payments.
Cyber Insurance- Risk of loss to property, breach of data and business interruption from various types of cyber-attacks.
Catastrophe risk primarily arises in the property, automobile, workers' compensation, casualty, group life, and group disability lines of business but could also arise from other coverages such as losses under PV&T and CPRI policies. Not all insurance losses arising from catastrophe risk are categorized as catastrophe losses within the segment operating results. For example, losses arising from the COVID-19 pandemic were not categorized as catastrophe losses within either the P&C or Group Benefits segments as the pandemic was not identified as a catastrophe event by the Property Claim Service in the U.S. See the term Current Accident Year Catastrophe Ratio within the Key Performance Measures section of MD&A for an explanation of how the Company defines catastrophe losses in its financial reporting.
Impact Non-catastrophe insurance risk can arise from unexpected loss experience, underpriced business and/or underestimation of loss reserves and can have significant effects on the Company’s earnings. Catastrophe insurance risk can arise from various unpredictable events and can have significant effects on the Company's earnings and may result in losses that could constrain its liquidity.
Management The Company's policies and procedures for managing these risks include disciplined underwriting protocols, exposure controls, sophisticated risk-based pricing, risk modeling, risk transfer, and capital management strategies. The Company has established underwriting guidelines for both individual risks, including individual policy limits, and risks in the aggregate, including aggregate exposure limits by geographic zone and peril. The Company uses both internal and third-party models to estimate the potential loss resulting from various catastrophe events and the potential financial impact those events would have on the Company's financial position and results of operations across its businesses.
|
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
|---|
The Hartford closely monitors scientific literature on climate change to help identify climate change risks impacting our business. We use data from the scientific community and other outside experts including partnerships with third-party catastrophe modeling firms to inform our risk management activities and stay abreast of potential implications of climate-related impacts that we incorporate into our risk assessment. We regularly study these climate change implications and incorporate these risks into our catastrophe risk assessment and management strategy through product pricing, underwriting and management of aggregate risk to manage implications of severe weather and climate change in our insurance portfolio.
In addition, certain insurance products offered by The Hartford provide coverage for losses incurred due to cyber events and the Company has assessed and modeled how those products would respond to different events in order to manage its aggregate exposure to losses incurred under the insurance policies we sell. The Company models numerous deterministic scenarios including losses caused by malware, data breach, distributed denial of service attacks, intrusions of cloud environments and attacks of power grids.
Among specific risk tolerances set by the Company, risk limits are set for natural catastrophes, terrorism risk and pandemic risk.
Reinsurance as a Risk Management Strategy
The Company uses reinsurance to transfer certain risks to reinsurance companies based on specific geographic or risk concentrations. A variety of traditional reinsurance products are used as part of the Company's risk management strategy, including excess of loss occurrence-based products that reinsure property and workers' compensation exposures, and individual risk (including facultative reinsurance) or quota share arrangements that reinsure losses from specific classes or lines of business. The Company has no significant finite risk contracts in place and the statutory surplus benefit from all such prior year contracts is immaterial. The Hartford also participates in governmentally administered reinsurance facilities such as the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund (“FHCF”), the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (“TRIPRA") and other reinsurance programs relating to particular risks or specific lines of business.
Reinsurance for Catastrophes- The Company utilizes various reinsurance programs to mitigate catastrophe losses including excess of loss occurrence-based treaties covering property and workers’ compensation, a catastrophe bond, an aggregate property catastrophe treaty, and individual risk agreements (including facultative reinsurance) that reinsure losses from specific classes or lines of business. The occurrence property catastrophe treaty and workers’ compensation catastrophe treaties beginning with the January 1, 2021 renewal do not cover pandemic losses, as most industry reinsurance programs exclude communicable disease. The Company has reinsurance in place to cover individual group life losses in excess of $1 per person.
|
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
|---|
Primary Catastrophe Treaty Reinsurance Coverages as of September 30, 2024 [1]
| Portion of losses reinsured | Portion of losses retained by The Hartford | |
|---|---|---|
| Per Occurrence Property Catastrophe Treaty from 1/1/2024 to 12/31/2024 [1] [2] | ||
| Losses of $0 to $200 | None | 100% retained |
| Losses of $200 to $350 for earthquakes and named hurricanes and tropical storms [3] | None | 100% retained |
| Losses of $200 to $350 from one event other than earthquakes and named hurricanes and tropical storms [3] | 40% of $150 in excess of $200 | 60% co-participation |
| Losses of $350 to $500 from one event (all perils) | 75% of $150 in excess of $350 | 25% co-participation |
| Losses of $500 to $1.2 billion from one event [4] (all perils) | 90% of $700 in excess of $500 | 10% co-participation |
| Per Occurrence Property Catastrophe Bond from 1/1/2024 to 12/31/2026 [5] | ||
| Losses of $1.1 billion to $1.4 billion for tropical cyclone and earthquake events [6] | 66.67% of $300 in excess of $1.1 billion | 33.33% of $300 in excess of $1.1 billion |
| Aggregate Property Catastrophe Treaty for 1/1/2024 to 12/31/2024 [7] | ||
| $0 to $750 of aggregate losses | None | 100% Retained |
| $750 to $950 of aggregate losses | 100% | None |
| Losses of $0 to $100 from one event | None | 100% Retained |
| Losses of $100 to $450 from one event [8] | 80% of $350 in excess of $100 | 20% co-participation |
[1]These agreements do not cover the assumed reinsurance business which purchases its own retrocessional coverage.
[2]In addition to the Per Occurrence Property Catastrophe Treaty, for Florida homeowners wind events, The Hartford has purchased the mandatory FHCF reinsurance for the annual period starting June 1, 2024. Retention and coverage varies by writing company. For the 2024 - 2025 period, the writing company with the largest coverage under FHCF is Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, with coverage of $35 in per event losses in excess of a $19 retention (estimates are based on best available information at this time and are periodically updated as information is made available by Florida).
[3]Named hurricanes and tropical storms are defined as any storm or storm system declared to be a hurricane or tropical storm by the US National Hurricane Center, US Weather Prediction Center, or their successor organizations (being divisions of the US National Weather Service).
[4]Portions of this layer of coverage extend beyond a traditional one year term.
[5]For further information on the Company's catastrophe bond, see MD&A - Enterprise Risk Management, Insurance Risk included in the Company's 2023 Form 10-K Annual report.
[6]Tropical cyclones are defined as a storm or storm system that has been declared by National Weather Service or any division or agency thereof (including the National Hurricane Center or the Weather Prediction Center) or any of their successors to be a hurricane, tropical storm, or tropical depression.
[7]The aggregate treaty is not limited to a single event; rather, it is designed to provide reinsurance protection for the aggregate of all catastrophe events (up to $350 per event), either designated by the Property Claim Services office of Verisk or, for international business, net losses arising from two or more risks involved in the same loss occurrence totaling at least $500 thousand. All catastrophe losses, except assumed reinsurance business losses, apply toward satisfying the $750 attachment point under the aggregate treaty.
[8]In addition to the limits shown, the workers' compensation reinsurance includes a non-catastrophe, industrial accident layer, providing coverage for 80% of $25 in per event losses in excess of a $25 retention.
In addition to the property catastrophe reinsurance coverage described in the above table, the Company has other reinsurance agreements that cover property catastrophe losses, some of which provide for reinstatement of limits in the event of a loss with reinstatement provisions varying depending on the layer of coverage. The Per Occurrence Property Catastrophe Treaty, and Workers' Compensation Catastrophe Treaty include a provision to reinstate one limit in the event that a catastrophe loss exhausts limits on one or more layers under the treaties.
Reinsurance for Terrorism- For the risk of terrorism, private sector catastrophe reinsurance capacity is generally limited and largely unavailable for terrorism losses caused by nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological attacks. As such, the Company's principal reinsurance protection against large-scale terrorist attacks is the coverage currently provided through TRIPRA to the end of 2027.
TRIPRA provides a backstop for insurance-related losses resulting from any “act of terrorism”, which is certified by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General, for losses that exceed a threshold of industry losses of $200. Under the
program, in any one calendar year, the federal government will pay a percentage of losses incurred from a certified act of terrorism after an insurer's losses exceed 20% of the Company's eligible direct commercial earned premiums of the prior calendar year up to a combined annual aggregate limit for the federal government and all insurers of $100 billion. The percentage of losses paid by the federal government is 80%. The Company's estimated deductible under the program is $2.0 billion for 2024. If an act of terrorism or acts of terrorism result in covered losses exceeding the $100 billion annual industry aggregate limit, Congress would be responsible for determining how additional losses in excess of $100 billion will be paid.
Reinsurance for A&E and Navigators Group Reserve Development - The Company has two adverse development covers ("ADC") reinsurance agreements in place, both of which are accounted for as retroactive reinsurance. One agreement covers substantially all A&E reserve development for 2016 and prior accident years (the “A&E ADC”) up to an aggregate limit of $1.5 billion and the other covered substantially all reserve development of Navigators Insurance Company and certain of its affiliates for 2018 and prior accident years (the “Navigators ADC”) up to an aggregate limit of $300, for which the Company
|
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
|---|
had previously ceded the available limit. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had paid claims related to the Navigators ADC in excess of the $1.816 billion acquisition date reserves plus the $100 retention. During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company collected recoveries from NICO and as a result amortized $87 of the $209 deferred gain within benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the deferred gain on the Navigators ADC was $122 and $209, respectively, and is included in other liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
For more information on the A&E ADC and the Navigators ADC, see Note 1 - Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies and Note 11 - Reserve for Unpaid Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in The Hartford's 2023 Form 10-K Annual Report.
|FINANCIAL RISK
Financial risks include direct and indirect risks to the Company's financial objectives from events that impact financial market conditions and the value of financial assets. Some events may cause correlated movement in multiple risk factors. The primary sources of financial risks are the Company's invested assets.
Consistent with its risk appetite, the Company establishes financial risk limits to control potential loss on a U.S. GAAP, statutory, and economic basis. Exposures are actively monitored and managed, with risks mitigated where appropriate. The Company uses various risk management strategies, including limiting aggregation of risk, portfolio re-balancing and hedging with over-the-counter ("OTC") and exchange-traded derivatives with counterparties meeting the appropriate regulatory and due diligence requirements. Derivatives may be used to achieve the following Company-approved objectives: (1) hedging risk arising from interest rate, equity market, commodity market, credit spread and issuer default, price or currency exchange rate risk or volatility; (2) managing liquidity; (3) controlling transaction costs; and (4) engaging in income generation covered call transactions and synthetic replication transactions. Derivative activities are monitored and evaluated by the Company’s compliance and risk management teams and reviewed by senior management. The Company identifies different categories of financial risk, including liquidity, credit, interest rate, equity, and foreign currency exchange.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk to current or prospective earnings or capital arising from the Company's inability or perceived inability to meet its contractual funding obligations as they come due.
Sources of Liquidity Risk Sources of liquidity risk include funding risk, company-specific liquidity risk and market liquidity risk resulting from differences in the amount and timing of sources and uses of cash as well as company-specific and general market conditions. Stressed market conditions may impact the ability to sell assets or otherwise transact business and may result in a significant loss in value of the investment portfolio.
Impact Inadequate capital resources and liquidity could negatively affect the Company’s overall financial strength and its ability to generate cash flows from its businesses, borrow funds at competitive rates, and raise new capital to meet operating and growth needs.
Management The Company has defined ongoing monitoring and reporting requirements to assess liquidity across the enterprise under both current and stressed market conditions. The Company measures and manages liquidity risk exposures and funding needs within prescribed limits across legal entities, taking into account legal, regulatory and operational limitations to the transferability of liquid assets among legal entities. The Company also monitors internal and external conditions, and identifies material risk changes and emerging risks that may impact operating cash flows or liquid assets. The liquidity requirements of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. ("HFSG Holding Company") have been and will continue to be met by the HFSG Holding Company's fixed maturities, short-term investments and cash, and dividends from its subsidiaries, principally from its insurance operations, as well as the issuance of common stock, debt or other capital securities and borrowings from its credit facilities, as needed. The Company maintains multiple sources of contingent liquidity including a revolving credit facility, an intercompany liquidity agreement that allows for short-term advances of funds among the HFSG Holding Company and certain affiliates, and access to collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston ("FHLBB") for certain affiliates. The Company's CFO has primary responsibility for liquidity risk.
Credit Risk and Counterparty Risk
Credit risk is the risk to earnings or capital due to uncertainty of an obligor’s or counterparty’s ability or willingness to meet its obligations in accordance with contractually agreed upon terms. Credit risk is comprised of three major factors: the risk of change in credit quality, or credit migration risk; the risk of default; and the risk of a change in value due to changes in credit spreads.
Sources of Credit Risk The majority of the Company’s credit risk is concentrated in its investment holdings and use of derivatives, but it is also present in the Company’s ceded reinsurance activities and various insurance products.
Impact A decline in creditworthiness is typically reflected as an increase in an investment’s credit spread and an associated decline in the investment's fair value, potentially resulting in recording an ACL and an increased probability of a realized loss upon sale. In certain instances, counterparties may default on their obligations and the Company may realize a loss on default. Premiums receivable, including premiums for retrospectively rated plans, reinsurance recoverable and deductible losses recoverable are also subject to credit risk based on the counterparty’s inability to pay.
Management The objective of the Company’s enterprise credit risk management strategy is to identify, quantify and manage credit risk in aggregate and to limit potential losses in accordance with the Company's credit risk management policy. The Company manages its credit risk by managing aggregations of risk, holding a diversified mix of issuers and counterparties across its investment, reinsurance and insurance
|
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
|---|
portfolios and limiting exposure to any specific reinsurer or counterparty. Potential credit losses can be mitigated through diversification (e.g., geographic regions, asset types, industry sectors), hedging and the use of collateral to reduce net credit exposure.
The Company manages credit risk through the use of various surveillance, analyses and governance processes. The investment and reinsurance areas have formal policies and procedures for counterparty approvals and authorizations, which establish criteria defining minimum levels of creditworthiness and financial stability for eligible counterparties. Potential investments are subject to underwriting reviews and management approval. Mitigation strategies vary across the three sources of credit risk, but may include:
Investing in a portfolio of high-quality and diverse securities;
Selling investments subject to heightened credit risk;
Hedging through use of credit default swaps;
Clearing derivative transactions through central clearing houses that require daily variation margin;
Entering into derivative and reinsurance contracts only with strong creditworthy institutions;
Requiring collateral; and
Non-renewing policies/contracts or reinsurance treaties.
The Company has developed credit exposure thresholds which are based upon counterparty ratings. Aggregate counterparty credit quality and exposure are monitored on a daily basis utilizing an enterprise-wide credit exposure information system that contains data on issuers, ratings, exposures, and credit limits. Exposures are tracked on a current and potential basis and aggregated by ultimate parent of the counterparty across investments, reinsurance receivables, insurance products with credit risk, and derivatives.
As of September 30, 2024, the Company had no investment exposure to any credit concentration risk of a single issuer or counterparty greater than 10% of the Company’s stockholders' equity, other than the U.S. government and certain U.S. government agencies. For further discussion of concentration of credit risk in the investment portfolio, see the Concentration of Credit Risk section in Note 5 - Investments of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Credit Risk of Derivatives
The Company uses various derivative counterparties in executing its derivative transactions. The use of counterparties creates credit risk that the counterparty may not perform in accordance with the terms of the derivative transaction.
Downgrades to the credit ratings of the Company’s insurance operating companies may have adverse implications for its use of derivatives. In some cases, downgrades may give derivative counterparties for OTC derivatives and clearing brokers for OTC-cleared derivatives the right to cancel and settle outstanding derivative trades or require additional collateral to be posted. In addition, downgrades may result in counterparties and clearing brokers becoming unwilling to engage in or clear additional derivatives or may require additional collateralization before entering into any new trades.
The Company also has derivative counterparty exposure policies which limit the Company’s exposure to credit risk. Credit exposures are generally quantified based on the prior business day’s net fair value, including income accruals, of all derivative positions transacted with a single counterparty for each separate legal entity. The notional amount of derivative contracts represents the basis upon which pay or receive amounts are calculated and are not necessarily reflective of credit risk. The Company enters into collateral arrangements in connection with its derivatives positions and collateral is pledged to or held by, or on behalf of, the Company to the extent the exposure is greater than zero, subject to minimum transfer thresholds, if applicable. In accordance with industry standards and the contractual requirements, collateral is typically settled on the same business day. For further discussion, see the Derivative Commitments section of Note 14 - Commitments and Contingencies of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Use of Credit Derivatives
The Company may also use credit default swaps to manage credit exposure or to assume credit risk to enhance yield.
Credit Risk Reduced Through Credit Derivatives
The Company uses credit derivatives to purchase credit protection with respect to a single entity or referenced index. The Company purchases credit protection through credit default swaps to economically hedge and manage credit risk of certain fixed maturity investments across multiple sectors of the investment portfolio.
Credit Risk Assumed Through Credit Derivatives
The Company may also enter into credit default swaps that assume credit risk as part of replication transactions. Replication transactions are used as an economical means to synthetically replicate the characteristics and performance of assets that are permissible investments under the Company’s investment policies. These swaps primarily reference investment grade single corporate issuers and indexes.
For further information on credit derivatives, see Note 6 - Derivatives of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Credit Risk of Business Operations
The Company is subject to credit risk related to the Company's Commercial Lines business that is written with large deductible policies or retrospectively-rated plans (referred to as "loss sensitive business"). The Company’s results of operations could be adversely affected if a significant portion of such contract holders failed to reimburse the Company for the deductible amount or the retrospectively rated policyholders failed to pay additional premiums owed. While the Company attempts to manage the risks discussed above through underwriting, credit analysis, collateral requirements, provision for bad debt, and other oversight mechanisms, the Company’s efforts may not be successful.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk of financial loss due to adverse changes in the value of assets and liabilities arising from movements in interest rates. Interest rate risk encompasses
|
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
|---|
exposures with respect to changes in the level of interest rates, the shape of the term structure of rates and the volatility of interest rates. Interest rate risk does not include exposure to changes in credit spreads.
Sources of Interest Rate Risk The Company has exposure to interest rate risk arising from investments in fixed maturities and commercial mortgage loans, issuances by the Company of debt securities, preferred stock and similar securities, discount rate assumptions associated with the Company’s claim reserves and pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, and assets that support the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit plans.
Impact Changes in interest rates from current levels can have both favorable and unfavorable effects for the Company.
Management The Company primarily manages its exposure to interest rate risk by constructing investment portfolios that seek to protect the Company from the economic impact associated with changes in interest rates by setting portfolio duration targets that are aligned with the duration of the liabilities that they support. The Company analyzes interest rate risk using various models including parametric models and cash flow simulation under various market scenarios of the liabilities and their supporting investment portfolios. Key metrics that the Company uses to quantify its exposure to interest rate risk inherent in its invested assets and the associated liabilities include duration, convexity and key rate duration.
The Company may also use interest rate swaps and, to a lesser extent, futures to mitigate interest rate risk associated with its investment portfolio or liabilities and to manage portfolio duration.
Equity Risk
Equity risk is the risk of financial loss due to changes in the value of global equities or equity indices.
Sources of Equity Risk The Company has exposure to equity risk from invested assets, assets that support the Company’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans, and fee income derived from Hartford Funds AUM.
Impact The investment portfolio is exposed to losses from market declines affecting equity securities and derivatives, which could negatively impact the Company's reported earnings. In addition, investments in limited partnerships and other alternative investments generally have a level of correlation to domestic equity market levels and can expose the Company to losses in earnings if valuations decline; however, earnings impacts are recognized on a lag as results from private equity investments and other funds are generally reported on a three-month delay. For assets supporting pension and other postretirement benefit plans, the Company may be required to make additional plan contributions if equity investments in the plan portfolios decline in value. Hartford Funds earnings are
also significantly influenced by the U.S. and other equity markets. Generally, declines in equity markets will reduce the value of average daily AUM and the amount of fee income generated from those assets. Increases in equity markets will generally have the inverse impact.
Management The Company uses various approaches in managing its equity exposure, including limits on the proportion of assets invested in equities, diversification of the equity portfolio, and, at times, hedging of changes in equity indices. For assets supporting pension and other postretirement benefit plans, the asset allocation mix is reviewed on a periodic basis. In order to minimize risk, the pension plans maintain a listing of permissible and prohibited investments and impose concentration limits and investment quality requirements on permissible investment options.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Foreign currency exchange risk is the risk of financial loss due to changes in the relative value between currencies.
Sources of Currency Risk The Company has foreign currency exchange risk in non-U.S. dollar denominated cash, fixed maturities, equities, and derivative instruments. In addition, the Company has non-U.S. subsidiaries, some with functional currencies other than U.S. dollar, and which transact business in multiple currencies resulting in assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
Impact Changes in relative values between currencies can create variability in cash flows and realized or unrealized gains and losses on changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities.
Management The Company manages its foreign currency exchange risk primarily through asset-liability matching and through the use of derivative instruments. However, legal entity capital is invested in local currencies in order to satisfy regulatory requirements and to support local insurance operations. The foreign currency exposure of non-U.S. dollar denominated investments will most commonly be reduced through the sale of the assets or through hedges using foreign currency swaps and forwards.
Investment Portfolio Risk
The following table presents the Company’s fixed maturities, AFS, by credit quality. The credit ratings referenced throughout this section are based on availability and are generally the midpoint of the available ratings among Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch. If no rating is available from a rating agency, then an internally developed rating is used. Accrued investment income related to fixed maturities is not included in the amortized cost or fair value of the fixed maturities. For further information refer to Note 5 - Investments of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
|---|
| Fixed Maturities, AFS by Credit Quality | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Percent of Total Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Percent of Total Fair Value | |
| United States Government/Government agencies | $5,064 | $4,815 | 11.2% | $5,174 | $4,776 | 12.0% |
| AAA | 7,225 | 7,127 | 16.7% | 7,277 | 7,055 | 17.7% |
| AA | 7,842 | 7,713 | 18.0% | 7,527 | 7,270 | 18.3% |
| A | 11,180 | 10,994 | 25.7% | 10,253 | 9,828 | 24.7% |
| BBB | 9,877 | 9,677 | 22.6% | 9,710 | 9,198 | 23.1% |
| BB & below | 2,476 | 2,467 | 5.8% | 1,785 | 1,691 | 4.2% |
| Total fixed maturities, AFS | $43,664 | $42,793 | 100.0% | $41,726 | $39,818 | 100.0% |
The fair value of fixed maturities, AFS increased as compared to December 31, 2023, primarily due to net additions of corporate bonds, high-quality RMBS and CLOs, partially offset by net reductions to U.S. treasuries, tax-exempt municipal bonds, and CMBS. The increase was also due to higher valuations as a result of lower interest rates and tighter credit spreads.
FVO securities are not included in the preceding table. For further discussion on FVO securities, see Note 4 - Fair Value Measurements of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
|---|
| Fixed Maturities, AFS by Type | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||
| Amortized Cost | ACL | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Percent of Total Fair Value | Amortized Cost | ACL | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Percent of Total Fair Value | |
| ABS | ||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | $2,307 | $— | $35 | $(6) | $2,336 | 5.5% | $2,414 | $— | $10 | $(18) | $2,406 | 6.0% |
| Other | 1,167 | — | 22 | (13) | 1,176 | 2.7% | 933 | — | 8 | (27) | 914 | 2.3% |
| CLOs | 3,553 | — | 10 | — | 3,563 | 8.3% | 3,104 | — | 3 | (17) | 3,090 | 7.8% |
| CMBS | ||||||||||||
| Agency [1] | 1,244 | (13) | 21 | (92) | 1,160 | 2.7% | 1,179 | (12) | 14 | (119) | 1,062 | 2.7% |
| Bonds | 1,715 | — | 2 | (122) | 1,595 | 3.7% | 2,150 | — | — | (219) | 1,931 | 4.8% |
| Interest only | 103 | — | 5 | (6) | 102 | 0.3% | 137 | — | 5 | (10) | 132 | 0.3% |
| Corporate | ||||||||||||
| Basic industry | 1,072 | — | 19 | (25) | 1,066 | 2.5% | 967 | — | 7 | (39) | 935 | 2.3% |
| Capital goods | 1,690 | — | 35 | (39) | 1,686 | 3.9% | 1,630 | — | 19 | (67) | 1,582 | 4.0% |
| Consumer cyclical | 1,616 | — | 38 | (42) | 1,612 | 3.8% | 1,331 | (4) | 20 | (55) | 1,292 | 3.2% |
| Consumer non-cyclical | 2,593 | — | 58 | (83) | 2,568 | 6.0% | 2,232 | — | 27 | (123) | 2,136 | 5.4% |
| Energy | 1,492 | — | 29 | (36) | 1,485 | 3.5% | 1,261 | — | 13 | (57) | 1,217 | 3.1% |
| Financial services | 5,880 | — | 79 | (170) | 5,789 | 13.5% | 5,434 | — | 30 | (283) | 5,181 | 13.0% |
| Tech./comm. | 2,753 | — | 69 | (114) | 2,708 | 6.3% | 2,470 | (2) | 47 | (143) | 2,372 | 6.0% |
| Transportation | 896 | — | 16 | (43) | 869 | 2.0% | 803 | — | 8 | (60) | 751 | 1.9% |
| Utilities | 2,488 | (3) | 50 | (114) | 2,421 | 5.7% | 2,155 | (3) | 25 | (148) | 2,029 | 5.1% |
| Other | 370 | — | 2 | (18) | 354 | 0.8% | 408 | — | 1 | (38) | 371 | 0.9% |
| Foreign govt./govt. agencies | 543 | — | 11 | (13) | 541 | 1.3% | 583 | — | 6 | (27) | 562 | 1.4% |
| Municipal bonds | ||||||||||||
| Taxable | 1,334 | — | 15 | (88) | 1,261 | 2.9% | 1,211 | — | 7 | (113) | 1,105 | 2.8% |
| Tax-exempt | 4,445 | — | 109 | (161) | 4,393 | 10.3% | 4,996 | — | 124 | (186) | 4,934 | 12.4% |
| RMBS | ||||||||||||
| Agency | 2,773 | — | 35 | (138) | 2,670 | 6.2% | 2,342 | — | 14 | (171) | 2,185 | 5.5% |
| Non-agency | 2,557 | — | 14 | (144) | 2,427 | 5.7% | 2,293 | — | 4 | (235) | 2,062 | 5.2% |
| Sub-prime | 26 | — | — | — | 26 | 0.1% | 40 | — | — | — | 40 | 0.1% |
| U.S. Treasuries | 1,047 | — | 20 | (82) | 985 | 2.3% | 1,653 | — | 26 | (150) | 1,529 | 3.8% |
| Total fixed maturities, AFS | $43,664 | $(16) | $694 | $(1,549) | $42,793 | 100.0% | $41,726 | $(21) | $418 | $(2,305) | $39,818 | 100.0% |
| FVO securities | $263 | $327 | ||||||||||
[1]Includes securities with pools of loans issued by the Small Business Administration which are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
The fair value of fixed maturities, AFS increased as compared to December 31, 2023, primarily due to net additions of corporate bonds, high-quality RMBS and CLOs, partially offset by net reductions to U.S. treasuries, tax-exempt municipal bonds, and CMBS. The increase was also due to higher valuations as a result of lower interest rates and tighter credit spreads.
Commercial & Residential Real Estate
The following tables present the Company’s exposure to CMBS and RMBS by credit quality included in the preceding Fixed Maturities, AFS by Type table.
|
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
|---|
| Exposure to CMBS & RMBS Bonds as of September 30, 2024 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAA | AA | A | BBB | BB and Below | Total | |||||||
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |
| CMBS | ||||||||||||
| Agency [1] | $15 | $15 | $1,229 | $1,145 | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $1,244 | $1,160 |
| Bonds | 612 | 586 | 448 | 416 | 295 | 266 | 153 | 135 | 207 | 192 | 1,715 | 1,595 |
| Interest Only | 57 | 56 | 39 | 39 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 103 | 102 |
| Total CMBS | 684 | 657 | 1,716 | 1,600 | 296 | 267 | 158 | 140 | 208 | 193 | 3,062 | 2,857 |
| RMBS | ||||||||||||
| Agency | — | — | 2,773 | 2,670 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,773 | 2,670 |
| Non-Agency | 1,593 | 1,514 | 675 | 640 | 204 | 194 | 74 | 70 | 11 | 9 | 2,557 | 2,427 |
| Sub-Prime | — | — | 8 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 26 | 26 |
| Total RMBS | 1,593 | 1,514 | 3,456 | 3,318 | 206 | 196 | 82 | 78 | 19 | 17 | 5,356 | 5,123 |
| Total CMBS & RMBS | $2,277 | $2,171 | $5,172 | $4,918 | $502 | $463 | $240 | $218 | $227 | $210 | $8,418 | $7,980 |
| Exposure to CMBS & RMBS Bonds as of December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAA | AA | A | BBB | BB and Below | Total | |||||||
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |
| CMBS | ||||||||||||
| Agency [1] | $20 | $19 | $1,159 | $1,043 | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— | $1,179 | $1,062 |
| Bonds | 852 | 795 | 545 | 485 | 371 | 317 | 147 | 119 | 235 | 215 | 2,150 | 1,931 |
| Interest Only | 76 | 72 | 54 | 53 | — | — | 7 | 7 | — | — | 137 | 132 |
| Total CMBS | 948 | 886 | 1,758 | 1,581 | 371 | 317 | 154 | 126 | 235 | 215 | 3,466 | 3,125 |
| RMBS | ||||||||||||
| Agency | — | — | 2,342 | 2,185 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,342 | 2,185 |
| Non-Agency | 1,263 | 1,144 | 526 | 477 | 300 | 260 | 189 | 169 | 15 | 12 | 2,293 | 2,062 |
| Sub-Prime | 1 | 1 | 12 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 40 | 40 |
| Total RMBS | 1,264 | 1,145 | 2,880 | 2,674 | 305 | 265 | 199 | 179 | 27 | 24 | 4,675 | 4,287 |
| Total CMBS & RMBS | $2,212 | $2,031 | $4,638 | $4,255 | $676 | $582 | $353 | $305 | $262 | $239 | $8,141 | $7,412 |
[1]Includes securities with pools of loans issued by the Small Business Administration which are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
The Company also has exposure to commercial mortgage loans. These loans are collateralized by real estate properties that are diversified both geographically throughout the United States and by property type. These commercial loans are originated by the Company as high quality whole loans, and the Company may sell participation interests in one or more loans to third parties. A loan participation interest represents a pro-rata share in interest and principal payments generated by the participated loan, and the relationship between the Company as loan originator, lead participant and servicer and the third party as a participant are governed by a participation agreement.
As of September 30, 2024, mortgage loans had an amortized cost of $6.5 billion and carrying value of $6.4 billion, with an ACL of $44. As of December 31, 2023, mortgage loans had an amortized cost of $6.1 billion and carrying value of $6.1 billion, with an ACL of $51. The release in the allowance reflects write-
offs, improved economic scenario forecasts and property specific reductions, partially offset by net additions of new loans.
The Company funded $462 of commercial mortgage loans, primarily industrial properties, with a weighted average loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio of 58% and a weighted average yield of 7.2% during the nine months ended September 30, 2024. The Company continues to originate commercial mortgage loans on institutional-quality properties with strong LTV ratios. There were no mortgage loans held for sale as of September 30, 2024, or December 31, 2023.
Municipal Bonds
The following table presents the Company's exposure to municipal bonds by type and weighted average credit quality included in the preceding Securities by Type table.
|
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
|---|
| Available For Sale Investments in Municipal Bonds | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Weighted Average Credit Quality | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Weighted Average Credit Quality | |
| General Obligation | $982 | $992 | AA | $807 | $814 | AA |
| Pre-refunded [1] | 85 | 87 | AA+ | 155 | 158 | AA+ |
| Revenue | ||||||
| Transportation | 1,147 | 1,123 | A+ | 1,325 | 1,298 | A+ |
| Health Care | 895 | 841 | A+ | 974 | 902 | A+ |
| Leasing [2] | 653 | 632 | AA | 761 | 732 | AA- |
| Education | 403 | 396 | AA | 527 | 520 | AA |
| Water & Sewer | 395 | 382 | AA | 362 | 347 | AA+ |
| Power | 302 | 300 | A+ | 275 | 271 | A |
| Sales Tax | 199 | 204 | AA | 231 | 237 | AA |
| Housing | 204 | 199 | AA | 179 | 172 | AA |
| Other | 514 | 498 | AA- | 611 | 588 | A+ |
| Total Revenue | 4,712 | 4,575 | AA- | 5,245 | 5,067 | AA- |
| Total Municipal | $5,779 | $5,654 | AA- | $6,207 | $6,039 | AA- |
[1]Pre-refunded bonds are bonds for which an irrevocable trust containing sufficient U.S. treasury, agency, or other securities has been established to fund the remaining payments of principal and interest.
[2]Leasing revenue bonds are generally the obligations of a financing authority established by the municipality that leases facilities back to a municipality. The notes are typically secured by lease payments made by the municipality that is leasing the facilities financed by the issue. Lease payments may be subject to annual appropriation by the municipality, or the municipality may be obligated to appropriate general tax revenues to make lease payments.
As of September 30, 2024, the largest issuer concentrations were the State of Illinois, the New York City Transitional Finance Authority, and CommonSpirit Health, which each comprised less than 3% of the municipal bond portfolio and were primarily comprised of general obligation and revenue bonds. As of December 31, 2023, the largest issuer concentrations were the New York City Transitional Finance Authority, the State of Illinois, and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which each comprised less than 3% of the municipal bond portfolio and were primarily comprised of general obligation and revenue bonds. In total, municipal bonds make up 10% of the fair value of the Company's investment portfolio.
Limited Partnerships and Other Alternative Investments
The following table presents the Company’s investments in limited partnerships and other alternative investments which include real estate joint ventures, real estate funds, private equity funds, other funds, and other alternative investments. Private equity funds primarily consist of investments in funds whose assets typically consist of a diversified pool of investments in small to mid-sized non-public businesses with high growth potential and strong owner sponsorship, as well as limited exposure to public markets.
Income or losses on investments in limited partnerships and other alternative investments are recognized on a lag as results from private equity investments and other funds are generally reported on a three-month delay.
| Limited Partnerships and Other Alternative Investments - Net Investment Income | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended September 30, · Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||
| Amount | Yield [1] | Amount | Yield [1] | Amount | Yield [1] | Amount | Yield [1] | |
| Real estate joint ventures and funds | $(13) | (2.5%) | $(12) | (2.5%) | $(79) | (5.3%) | $(39) | (2.8%) |
| Private equity funds | 29 | 6.1% | 55 | 12.8% | 71 | 5.1% | 115 | 9.5% |
| Other funds | 12 | 8.6% | 9 | 7.8% | 40 | 10.5% | 24 | 7.3% |
| Other alternative investments [2] | 9 | 6.6% | 20 | 15.9% | 37 | 9.7% | 30 | 8.3% |
| Total | $37 | 3.0% | $72 | 6.3% | $69 | 1.9% | $130 | 4.0% |
[1]Yields calculated using annualized net investment income divided by the monthly average invested assets.
[2]Consists of an insurer-owned life insurance policy which is primarily invested in private equity funds and fixed income.
|
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
|---|
| Investments in Limited Partnerships and Other Alternative Investments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||
| Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | |
| Real estate joint ventures and funds | $1,957 | 39.0% | $1,931 | 40.4% |
| Private equity funds | 1,943 | 38.7% | 1,838 | 38.4% |
| Other funds | 572 | 11.4% | 498 | 10.4% |
| Other alternative investments [1] | 547 | 10.9% | 518 | 10.8% |
| Total | $5,019 | 100.0% | $4,785 | 100.0% |
[1]Consists of an insurer-owned life insurance policy which is primarily invested in private equity funds and fixed income.
Fixed Maturities, AFS — Unrealized Loss Aging
The total gross unrealized losses were $1.5 billion as of September 30, 2024, and have decreased $0.8 billion from December 31, 2023, primarily due to lower interest rates and tighter credit spreads. As of September 30, 2024, $1.3 billion of the gross unrealized losses were associated with fixed maturities, AFS depressed less than 20% of amortized cost. The remaining $0.2 billion of gross unrealized losses were associated with fixed maturities, AFS depressed greater than 20%. The fixed maturities, AFS depressed more than 20% primarily related to corporate fixed maturities, municipal bonds, and U.S. treasuries, that are mainly depressed because current interest rates are higher and/or market spreads are wider than at the respective purchase dates.
As part of the Company’s ongoing investment monitoring process, the Company has reviewed its fixed maturities, AFS in an unrealized loss position and concluded that these fixed maturities are temporarily depressed and are expected to recover in value as the investments approach maturity or as market spreads tighten. For these fixed maturities in an unrealized loss position where an ACL has not been recorded, the Company’s best estimate of expected future cash flows are sufficient to recover the amortized cost basis of the investment. Furthermore, the Company neither has an intention to sell nor does it expect to be required to sell these investments. For further information regarding the Company’s ACL analysis, see the Credit Losses on Fixed Maturities, AFS and Intent-to-Sell Impairments section below.
| Unrealized Loss Aging for Fixed Maturities, AFS Securities | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||
| Consecutive Months | Items | Amortized Cost | ACL | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Items | Amortized Cost | ACL | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value |
| Three months or less | 123 | $1,214 | $— | $(4) | $1,210 | 51 | $440 | $— | $(4) | $436 |
| Greater than three to six months | 24 | 154 | — | (1) | 153 | 35 | 143 | — | (2) | 141 |
| Greater than six to nine months | 59 | 448 | — | (5) | 443 | 137 | 1,117 | — | (13) | 1,104 |
| Greater than nine to eleven months | 8 | 112 | — | (1) | 111 | 97 | 738 | — | (22) | 716 |
| Twelve months or more | 2,886 | 19,989 | (13) | (1,538) | 18,438 | 3,530 | 27,448 | (14) | (2,264) | 25,170 |
| Total | 3,100 | $21,917 | $(13) | $(1,549) | $20,355 | 3,850 | $29,886 | $(14) | $(2,305) | $27,567 |
| Unrealized Loss Aging for Fixed Maturities, AFS Continuously Depressed Over 20% | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||
| Consecutive Months | Items | Amortized Cost | ACL | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Items | Amortized Cost | ACL | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value |
| Three months or less | 4 | $15 | $— | $(3) | $12 | 14 | $56 | $(1) | $(13) | $42 |
| Greater than three to six months | 4 | 48 | (1) | (11) | 36 | 10 | 19 | (2) | (4) | 13 |
| Greater than six to nine months | 4 | 44 | — | (11) | 33 | 31 | 148 | — | (33) | 115 |
| Greater than nine to eleven months | — | — | — | — | — | 22 | 163 | — | (40) | 123 |
| Twelve months or more | 98 | 846 | (1) | (223) | 622 | 143 | 1,216 | — | (327) | 889 |
| Total | 110 | $953 | $(2) | $(248) | $703 | 220 | $1,602 | $(3) | $(417) | $1,182 |
|
| Table of Contents | Index to MD&A |
|---|
Credit Losses on Fixed Maturities, AFS and Intent-to-Sell Impairments
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company recorded net credit losses of $0 and $2, respectively. Net credit losses were primarily attributable to increases in the ACL of $1 on CMBS and $1 on a below investment grade corporate issuer. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, unrealized losses on securities with an ACL recognized in other comprehensive income ("OCI") were $0 and less than $1, respectively. For further information, refer to Note 5 - Investments of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
There were no intent-to-sell impairments.
The Company incorporates its best estimate of future performance using internal assumptions and judgments that are informed by economic and industry specific trends, as well as our expectations with respect to security specific developments.
Future intent-to-sell impairments or credit losses may develop as the result of changes in our intent to sell specific securities that are in an unrealized loss position or if modeling assumptions, such as macroeconomic factors or security specific developments, change unfavorably from our current modeling assumptions, resulting in lower cash flow expectations.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, the Company recorded net credit losses of $5 and $13, respectively. The net credit losses were primarily attributable to increases in the ACL of $5 and $11, respectively, related to three below investment grade corporate issuers. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, unrealized losses on securities with an ACL recognized in OCI were $0 and $4, respectively.
There were no intent-to-sell impairments.
ACL on Mortgage Loans
The Company reviews mortgage loans on a quarterly basis to estimate the ACL with changes in the ACL recorded in net realized gains and losses. Apart from an ACL recorded on individual mortgage loans where the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, the Company records an ACL on the pool of mortgage loans based on lifetime expected credit losses. For further information, refer to Note 5 - Investments of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
For the three months ended September 30, 2024, there were no credit loss adjustments on mortgage loans. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company recorded a credit loss reversal of $3 primarily attributable to improved economic scenario forecasts and property specific improvements, partially offset by net additions of new loans.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, the Company recorded an increase in the ACL on mortgage loans of $5 and $10, respectively. The increase in the allowance is primarily attributable to lower property valuations and overall weaker real estate fundamentals.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.