AES CORP

Overview

As of June 30, 2025, the Company had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $1.4 billion, of which $9 million was held at the Parent Company and qualified holding companies. The Company had restricted cash and debt service reserves of $851 million. The Company also had non-recourse and recourse aggregate principal amounts of debt outstanding of $23.9 billion and $5.8 billion, respectively. Of the $2.7 billion of our current non-recourse debt, $2.6 billion was presented as such because it is due in the next twelve months and $175 million relates to debt considered in default. AES Puerto Rico is in payment default. All other defaults are not payment defaults but are instead technical defaults triggered by failure to comply with covenants or other requirements contained in the non-recourse debt documents. See Note 8—Obligations in Item 1.—Financial Statementsof this Form 10-Q for additional detail. As of June 30, 2025, the Company also had $621 million outstanding related to supplier financing arrangements.

We expect current maturities of non-recourse debt, recourse debt, and amounts due under supplier financing arrangements to be repaid from net cash provided by operating activities of the subsidiary to which the liability relates, through opportunistic refinancing activity, or some combination thereof. We have $990 million in recourse debt which matures within the next twelve months, including $67 million in outstanding borrowings under the commercial paper program. Furthermore, we have $393 million due under supplier financing arrangements that have a guarantee, $216 million guaranteed by the Parent Company and $177 million guaranteed by subsidiaries. From time to time, we may elect to repurchase our outstanding debt through cash purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise when management believes that such securities are attractively priced. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, and other factors. The amounts involved in any such repurchases may be material.

We rely mainly on long-term debt obligations to fund our construction activities. We have, to the extent available at acceptable terms, utilized non-recourse debt to fund a significant portion of the capital expenditures and investments required to construct and acquire our electric power plants, distribution companies, and related assets. Our non-recourse financing is designed to limit cross-default risk to the Parent Company or other subsidiaries and affiliates. Our non-recourse long-term debt is a combination of fixed and variable interest rate instruments. Debt is typically denominated in the currency that matches the currency of the revenue expected to be generated from the benefiting project, thereby reducing currency risk. In certain cases, the currency is matched through the use of derivative instruments. The majority of our non-recourse debt is funded by international commercial banks, with debt capacity supplemented by multilaterals and local regional banks.

Given our long-term debt obligations, the Company is subject to interest rate risk on debt balances that accrue interest at variable rates. When possible, the Company will borrow funds at fixed interest rates or hedge its variable rate debt to fix its interest costs on such obligations. In addition, the Company has historically tried to maintain at least 70% of its consolidated long-term obligations at fixed interest rates, including fixing the interest rate through the use of interest rate swaps. These efforts apply to the notional amount of the swaps compared to the amount of related underlying debt. Additionally, commercial paper issuances are short-term in nature and subject the Parent Company to interest rate risk at the time of refinancing the paper. On a consolidated basis, of the Company’s $30 billion of total gross debt outstanding as of June 30, 2025, approximately $9.2 billion accrues interest at variable rates. The Company actively hedges its current and expected variable rate exposure through a combination of currently effective and forward starting interest rate swaps. As of June 30, 2025, the total maximum outstanding amount of hedges protecting the company against current and expected variable rate exposure was $9.4 billion. These hedges generally provide economic protection through the entire expected life of the projects, regardless of the type of debt issued to finance construction or refinance the projects in the future.

77 | The AES Corporation | June 30, 2025 Form 10-Q

In addition to utilizing non-recourse debt at a subsidiary level when available, the Parent Company provides a portion, or in certain instances all, of the remaining long-term financing or credit required to fund development, construction, or acquisition of a particular project. These investments have generally taken the form of equity investments or intercompany loans, which are subordinated to the project’s non-recourse loans. We generally obtain the funds for these investments from our cash flows from operations, proceeds from the sales of assets and/or the proceeds from our issuances of debt, common stock, and other securities. Similarly, in certain of our businesses, the Parent Company may provide financial guarantees or other credit support for the benefit of counterparties who have entered into contracts for the purchase or sale of electricity, equipment, or other services with our subsidiaries or lenders. In such circumstances, if a business defaults on its payment or supply obligation, the Parent Company will be responsible for the business’ obligations up to the amount provided for in the relevant guarantee or other credit support. As of June 30, 2025, the Parent Company had provided outstanding financial and performance-related guarantees or other credit support commitments to or for the benefit of our businesses, which were limited by the terms of the agreements, of approximately $4.7 billion in aggregate (excluding those collateralized by letters of credit and other obligations discussed below).

Some counterparties may be unwilling to accept our general unsecured commitments to provide credit support. Accordingly, with respect to both new and existing commitments, the Parent Company may be required to provide some other form of assurance, such as a letter of credit, to backstop or replace our credit support. The Parent Company may not be able to provide adequate assurances to such counterparties. To the extent we are required and able to provide letters of credit or other collateral to such counterparties, this will reduce the amount of credit available to us to meet our other liquidity needs. As of June 30, 2025, we had $310 million in letters of credit under bilateral agreements, $163 million in letters of credit outstanding provided under our unsecured credit facilities, and $48 million in letters of credit outstanding provided under our revolving credit facilities. These letters of credit operate to guarantee performance relating to certain project development and construction activities and business operations. During the quarter ended June 30, 2025, the Company paid letter of credit fees ranging from 1% to 3% per annum on the outstanding amounts.

Additionally, in connection with certain project financings, some of the Company's subsidiaries have expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments. These contingent contractual obligations are issued at the subsidiary level and are non-recourse to the Parent Company. As of June 30, 2025, the maximum undiscounted potential exposure to guarantees and letters of credit issued by our subsidiaries was $5.6 billion, including $1.9 billion of customary payment guarantees under EPC contracts and other agreements, $1.6 billion of letters of credit outstanding, $1.3 billion of surety bonds and other guarantees issued by insurance companies, and $816 million of tax equity financing related guarantees.

We expect to continue to seek, where possible, non-recourse debt financing in connection with the assets or businesses that we or our affiliates may develop, construct, or acquire. However, depending on local and global market conditions and the unique characteristics of individual businesses, non-recourse debt may not be available on economically attractive terms or at all. If we decide not to provide any additional funding or credit support to a subsidiary project that is under construction or has near-term debt payment obligations and that subsidiary is unable to obtain additional non-recourse debt, such subsidiary may become insolvent, and we may lose our investment in that subsidiary. Additionally, if any of our subsidiaries lose a significant customer, the subsidiary may need to withdraw from a project or restructure the non-recourse debt financing. If we or the subsidiary choose not to proceed with a project or are unable to successfully complete a restructuring of the non-recourse debt, we may lose our investment in that subsidiary.

Many of our subsidiaries depend on timely and continued access to capital markets to manage their liquidity needs. The inability to raise capital on favorable terms, to refinance existing indebtedness, or to fund operations and other commitments during times of political or economic uncertainty may have material adverse effects on the financial condition and results of operations of those subsidiaries. In addition, changes in the timing of tariff increases or delays in the regulatory determinations under the relevant concessions could affect the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses.

78 | The AES Corporation | June 30, 2025 Form 10-Q

Long-Term Receivables

As of June 30, 2025, the Company had approximately $110 million of gross accounts receivable classified as Other noncurrent assets. These noncurrent receivables mostly consist of accounts receivable in the U.S. and Chile that, pursuant to amended agreements or government resolutions, have collection periods that extend beyond June 30, 2026, or one year from the latest balance sheet date. Noncurrent receivables in the U.S. pertain primarily to the sale of the Redondo Beach land. Noncurrent receivables in Chile pertain primarily to payment deferrals granted to mining customers as part of our green blend agreements. See Note 5—Financing Receivables in Item 1.—Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further information.

As of June 30, 2025, the Company had a $905 million loan receivable related to the Mong Duong facility in Vietnam, which was constructed under a build, operate, and transfer contract. This loan receivable represents contract consideration related to the construction of the facility, which was substantially completed in 2015, and will be collected over the 25-year term of the plant’s PPA. Of the loan receivable balance, $105 million was classified in Other current assets and $800 million was classified in Loan receivableon the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 5—Financing Receivables and Note 14—Revenue in Item 1.—Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for further information.

Cash Sources and Uses

The primary sources of cash for the Company in the six months ended June 30, 2025 were debt financings, cash flows from operating activities, sales to noncontrolling interests, purchases under supplier financing arrangements, and issuance of preferred shares in subsidiaries. The primary uses of cash in the six months ended June 30, 2025 were repayments of debt, capital expenditures, and repayments of obligations under supplier financing arrangements.

The primary sources of cash for the Company in the six months ended June 30, 2024 were debt financings, purchases under supplier financing arrangements, and cash flows from operating activities. The primary uses of cash in the six months ended June 30, 2024 were capital expenditures, repayments of debt, and repayments of obligations under supplier financing arrangements.

A summary of cash-based activities is as follows (in millions):

(1)Includes interest capitalized on development and construction of $242 million and $327 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Of the total capitalized, $232 million and $293 million, respectively, are related to recourse and non-recourse debt interest payments. The remaining capitalized interest is primarily related to supplier financing arrangements. Interest capitalized during development and construction decreased primarily due to fewer projects in development at the Renewables SBU.

79 | The AES Corporation | June 30, 2025 Form 10-Q

Consolidated Cash Flows

The following table reflects the changes in operating, investing, and financing cash flows for the comparative six-month period (in millions):

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $842 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2024.

Operating Cash Flows

(1)The change in adjusted net income is defined as the variance innet income, net of the total adjustments to net incomeas shown on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 1.—Financial Statementsof this Form 10-Q.

(2)The change in working capital is defined as the variance in total changes in operating assets and liabilities as shown on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 1.—Financial Statementsof this Form 10-Q.

•Adjusted net income increased $109 million, primarily due to increased proceeds from the transfer of U.S. investment tax credits, and a decrease in cash paid for interest and income taxes, partially offset by lower margin at our Energy Infrastructure SBU.

•Change in working capital increased $733 million, primarily due to a decrease in accounts receivable due to the timing of collections and billings, a decrease in prepaid expense and other assets due to the timing of collection of tax credit transfer proceeds and proceeds from interest rate swap settlements, an increase in accounts payable due to the timing of payments, an increase in accrued interest due to higher debt balances and interest rates, and an impact from changes in income tax payable mainly due to lower taxable income in 2024 and timing of advanced tax payments in Colombia, as well as higher VAT at Maritza. These increases were partially offset by the prior year sale of financing receivables under the Warrior Run PPA termination agreement.

80 | The AES Corporation | June 30, 2025 Form 10-Q

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities decreased $1.3 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2024.

Investing Cash Flows

•Cash from short-term investing activities increased $86 million, primarily due to the sale of AES Brasil in October 2024 and the timing of deposits at AES Global Insurance.

•Purchase of emissions allowances increased $143 million primarily due to higher CO 2 purchases at Maritza.

•Capital expenditures decreased $1.2 billion, discussed further below.

Capital Expenditures

(1)Growth expenditures generally include expenditures related to development projects in construction, expenditures that increase capacity of a facility beyond the original design, and investments in general load growth or system modernization.

(2)Maintenance expenditures generally include expenditures that are necessary to maintain regular operations or net maximum capacity of a facility.

•Growth expenditures decreased $1.1 billion, primarily driven by a decrease in expenditures for U.S. renewables projects compared to the prior year.

•Maintenance expenditures decreased $131 million, primarily driven by a $56 million decrease at AES Indiana and Southland due to the timing of maintenance, and a $39 million decrease due to the sale of AES Brasil in October 2024.

81 | The AES Corporation | June 30, 2025 Form 10-Q

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities decreased $2.3 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2024.

Financing Cash Flows

See Notes 1—Financial Statement Presentation, 8—Obligations, and 12—Equityin Item 1.—Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for more information regarding significant transactions.

•The $1.6 billion impact from non-recourse revolvers is primarily due to $1.4 billion and $279 million of higher net repayments in the current year at the Renewables and Utilities SBUs, respectively; partially offset by $75 million of higher net repayments at the Infrastructure SBU in the prior year.

•The $924 million impact from recourse debt is primarily due to the issuance of $950 million subordinated notes at the Parent Company in the prior year, partially offset by the issuance of $800 million of senior notes and repayments of $774 million at the Parent Company in the current year.

•The $623 million impact from commercial paper and $50 million impact from the Parent Company revolver are due to higher net borrowings in the prior year.

•The $230 million impact from non-recourse debt transactions is primarily due to $1.3 billion of higher net borrowings at the Energy Infrastructure and Utilities SBUs in the prior year, which included $273 million related to the sale of future revenue at Warrior Run which was recorded as non-recourse debt; partially offset by $1.1 billion of higher net borrowings at the Renewables SBU in the current year.

•The $815 million impact from sales to noncontrolling interests is primarily due to $541 million from the sale of ownership interest in AES Ohio in the current year, a $233 million increase in proceeds at AES Clean Energy Development and AES Renewable Holdings from the sales of ownership in project companies to tax equity investors, and $150 million at AES Indiana from the sale of ownership in the Pike County BESS project to a tax equity investor in the current year; partially offset by $47 million related to the prior year sale of ownership interest in Hardy Hills to a tax equity investor, a $40 million decrease in sales under the Chile Renovables partnership with GIP, and $35 million related to the prior year sale of ownership interest in the Marahu project.

•The $452 million impact from issuance of preferred shares in subsidiaries is primarily due to the proceeds received from the issuance of preferred shares in AES Global Insurance.

Parent Company Liquidity

The following discussion is included as a useful measure of the liquidity available to The AES Corporation, or the Parent Company, given the non-recourse nature of most of our indebtedness. Parent Company Liquidity, as outlined below, is a non-GAAP measure and should not be construed as an alternative to Cash and cash equivalents, which is determined in accordance with GAAP. Parent Company Liquidity may differ from similarly titled measures used by other companies. The principal sources of liquidity at the Parent Company level are dividends and other distributions from our subsidiaries, including refinancing proceeds; proceeds from debt and equity financings at the Parent Company level, including availability under our revolving credit facilities and commercial paper program; and proceeds from asset sales. The Parent Company credit facilities and commercial paper program are generally used for short-term cash needs to bridge the timing of distributions from subsidiaries. Cash

82 | The AES Corporation | June 30, 2025 Form 10-Q

requirements at the Parent Company level are primarily to fund interest and principal repayments of debt, construction commitments, other equity commitments, acquisitions, taxes, Parent Company overhead and development costs, and dividends on common stock.

The Company defines Parent Company Liquidity as cash available to the Parent Company, including cash at qualified holding companies, plus available borrowings under our existing credit facilities and commercial paper program. The cash held at qualified holding companies represents cash sent to subsidiaries of the Company domiciled outside of the U.S. Such subsidiaries have no contractual restrictions on their ability to send cash to the Parent Company. Parent Company Liquidity is reconciled to its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, Cash and cash equivalents, at the periods indicated as follows (in millions):

The Parent Company paid dividends of $0.17595 per outstanding share to its common stockholders during the first and second quarters of 2025 for dividends declared in December 2024 and February 2025. While we intend to continue payment of dividends and believe we will have sufficient liquidity to do so, we can provide no assurance that we will continue to pay dividends, or if continued, the amount of such dividends.

Recourse Debt

Our total recourse debt was $5.8 billion and $5.7 billion as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. See Note 8—Obligations in Item 1.—Financial Statementsof this Form 10-Q and Note 12—Obligations in Item 8.—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of our 2024 Form 10-K for additional detail.

We believe that our sources of liquidity will be adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future. This belief is based on a number of material assumptions, including, without limitation, assumptions about our ability to access the capital markets, the operating and financial performance of our subsidiaries, currency exchange rates, power market pool prices, and the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends. In addition, our subsidiaries’ ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us (at the Parent Company level) is subject to certain limitations contained in loans, governmental provisions, and other agreements. We can provide no assurance that these sources will be available when needed or that the actual cash requirements will not be greater than anticipated. We have met our interim needs for shorter-term and working capital financing at the Parent Company level with our revolving credit facility and commercial paper program. See Item 1A.—Risk Factors—The AES Corporation’s ability to make payments on its outstanding indebtedness is dependent upon the receipt of funds from our subsidiaries of the Company’s 2024 Form 10-K for additional information.

Various debt instruments at the Parent Company level, including our revolving credit facilities and commercial paper program, contain certain restrictive covenants. The covenants provide for, among other items, limitations on other indebtedness, liens, investments and guarantees; limitations on dividends, stock repurchases and other equity transactions; restrictions and limitations on mergers and acquisitions, sales of assets, leases, transactions with affiliates and off-balance sheet and derivative arrangements; maintenance of certain financial ratios; and financial and other reporting requirements. As of June 30, 2025, we were in compliance with these covenants at the Parent Company level.

Non-Recourse Debt

While the lenders under our non-recourse debt financings generally do not have direct recourse to the Parent Company, defaults thereunder can still have important consequences for our results of operations and liquidity, including, without limitation:

•reducing our cash flows as the subsidiary will typically be prohibited from distributing cash to the Parent Company during the time period of any default;

•triggering our obligation to make payments under any financial guarantee, letter of credit, or other credit support we have provided to or on behalf of such subsidiary;

•causing us to record a loss in the event the lender forecloses on the assets; and

83 | The AES Corporation | June 30, 2025 Form 10-Q

•triggering defaults in our outstanding debt at the Parent Company.

For example, our revolving credit facilities and outstanding debt securities at the Parent Company include events of default for certain bankruptcy-related events involving material subsidiaries. In addition, our revolving credit agreement at the Parent Company includes events of default related to payment defaults and accelerations of outstanding debt of material subsidiaries.

Some of our subsidiaries are currently in default with respect to all or a portion of their outstanding indebtedness. The total non-recourse debt classified as current in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets amounts to $2.7 billion. The portion of current debt related to such defaults was $175 million at June 30, 2025, all of which was non-recourse debt related to three subsidiaries: AES Puerto Rico, AES Ilumina, and AES Jordan Solar. AES Puerto Rico is in payment default. All other defaults are not payment defaults, but are instead technical defaults triggered by failure to comply with other covenants or other conditions contained in the non-recourse debt documents. See Note 8—Obligations in Item 1.—Financial Statementsof this Form 10-Q for additional detail.

None of the subsidiaries that are currently in default are subsidiaries that met the applicable definition of materiality under the Parent Company’s debt agreements as of June 30, 2025, in order for such defaults to trigger an event of default or permit acceleration under the Parent Company’s indebtedness. However, as a result of additional dispositions of assets, other significant reductions in asset carrying values or other matters in the future that may impact our financial position and results of operations or the financial position of the individual subsidiary, it is possible that one or more of these subsidiaries could fall within the definition of a “material subsidiary” and thereby trigger an event of default and possible acceleration of the indebtedness under the Parent Company’s outstanding debt securities. A material subsidiary is defined in the Parent Company’s revolving credit agreement as any business that contributed 20% or more of the Parent Company’s total cash distributions from businesses for the four most recently ended fiscal quarters. As of June 30, 2025, none of the defaults listed above resulted in a cross-default under the recourse debt of the Parent Company. Furthermore, none of the non-recourse debt in default listed above is guaranteed by the Parent Company.